How do you use the "if statement"? Because in my model when using it the model is corrupted
#animations
molten shadow
fathom forge
You might have to use a ternary operator
molten shadow
and what is that
fathom forge
The basic syntax is condition ? true output : false output
molten shadow
The basic syntax is `condition ? true output : false output`
I'm using "body2.sx": "if(is_aggressive, 1, 0)"
fathom forge
Try this:
"body2.sx": "is_aggressive ? 1 : 0"
molten shadow
Try this:
`"body2.sx": "is_aggressive ? 1 : 0"`
It says that the "?" is invalid
molten shadow
Try this:
`"body2.sx": "is_aggressive ? 1 : 0"`
Doesnt works
it says that the animation is invalid
night flame
then your animation is invalid
molten shadow
then your animation is invalid
I'm using the animation from Ewan's tutorial
night flame
show
molten shadow
I'm using `"body2.sx": "if(is_aggressive, 1, 0)"`
is this one
night flame
where it said invalid? the green check mark is there
night flame
try copy this character below instead
?
anyyways, both ways of writing is valid
ok...i think the plugin doesn't like it being this way
molten shadow
so what can i do
night flame
use this, it's the same
molten shadow
I already did
And it looks bugged in minecraft
The "sx, sy" only work in a specific version?
night flame
always show what you think aren't right, so we can have a better understanding what's going on
there's difference between looks bugged and not work, one work but not quite as expected, while another entirely don't work
molten shadow
When I put the animation of "sx, sy" it looks like this
Brooo My internet sucks x2
jaunty idol
Try this:
`"body2.sx": "is_aggressive ? 1 : 0"`
my man trying to explain how to write CEM animations without having any idea how to write CEM animations 💀
fathom forge
That's why I stopped helping.
molten shadow
yes
night flame
@jaunty idol since you are here, can you remove that extra ,?
jaunty idol
done
night flame
my man trying to explain how to write CEM animations without having any idea how...
but aren't we used to be able to write it that way?
thx
jaunty idol
but aren't we used to be able to write it that way?
thats not a vallid animation format
molten shadow
But if I am literally copying the format that Ewan uses in his tutorial just changing the condition it looks like this in minecraft
night flame
how is your model suppose to look like when agressive?
molten shadow
how is your model suppose to look like when agressive?
Like that
night flame
and before/when not agressive, it will just like a normal enderman?
molten shadow
night flame
check settings see if you have optifine cem enable
if the not aggressive one aren't showing right, your setup are wrong to begin with
molten shadow
if the not aggressive one aren't showing right, your setup are wrong to begin wi...
But it looks bugged when i put the animation
night flame
instead of two {} try put all inside one instead?
[
{
"your part": "......",
"your part": "......",
"your part": "......"
}
]
or you messed up with the file between saves.
beside that, you might wanna check output log for errors/warnings, i aren't experience with optifine afterall.
molten shadow
Maybe it doesn't work because of the pivots?
molten shadow
instead of two `{}` try put all inside one instead?
```json
[
{
"your part...
and I tried it with only 2 "{}"
Already
Visible works in Minecraft 1.16.5?
night flame
no clue, i only play with cem once in 1.13
molten shadow
How many lines of animation can there be in a single {}
night flame
a whole lot if you check fresh animation's cem
molten shadow
a whole lot if you check fresh animation's cem
It still doesn't work
Isn't it because of the version?
I would look at how fresh animations works but it won't let me open it in bb
molten shadow
thats not a vallid animation format
In 1.16.5 can you animate models?
night flame
that aren't the right way to include another model
molten shadow
that aren't the right way to include another model
And how would it be correct?
night flame
since almost all your parts have different pivot than the original part, and you are in 1.16.5
the best way to have another cem on top of the original one should be dump every custom parts under the body folder
molten shadow
since almost all your parts have different pivot than the original part, and you...
But I did that too
Before
night flame
just saying that having each of your custom bones under the original bones is never a ideal way to do, especially when they don't share the same pivot/animation
molten shadow
But since there are 2 bodies, 2 heads, etc., it doesn't matter if I put a folder called body2 and another called body3?
night flame
your other parts will be rotate in relative to the original bones
this right arm for example, that red dot will be it's pivot
it's also not easy to be organize
molten shadow
since almost all your parts have different pivot than the original part, and you...
It's okay like that?
