add Madsen LMG

[split sinew]

A machine gun that, like the Browning M1919, has been in service for a long time, which is currently in service by the BOPE of Brazil (the special forces of the Brazilian police)

[weary moat]

https://discord.com/channels/303681520202285057/1170741264791130162

[split sinew]

And the Browning machine gun that the vehicles carry in Battlebit, what year do you think it is?

[weary moat]

those are part of the vehicle, not a seperate infantry thing
and it's used by the us (in game faction) instead of brazil (not in game faction)
also the thing's just outdated and doesn't fit bbr

[split sinew]

Following that logic, the FAL should also be removed then, since it is not used by either the US or Russia currently, in addition to the fact that it does not specify the rules that must belong to an already integrated faction of the game.

And whether it is in the vehicle or not, the Browning is still a machine gun with more than 100 years of service, bruh

or the F2000 which is not used equally by the US or Russia

Or also the L86A1 which is a British machine gun

And why talk about the Desert Eagle?

[worthy stream]

also mg3 being one of the leaked guns

[split sinew]

Exactly, a machine gun that is mainly based on the MG42 (in fact it is the modernized version of this)

[worthy stream]

madsen could be the first lmg that hits hard but has less firerate or something in those lines

[split sinew]

Exactly

I'm going to laugh if come up with any other bullshit argument for not adding the madsen XD

[weary moat]

all nato guns...

[summer holly]

oh so now its nato and not US or Russia?

[weary moat]

and a madsen "lmg" just doesn't fit at all

[summer holly]

and why not?

[weary moat]

also, potentially hard hitting lmgs have already been leaked

[split sinew]

But wasn't it because it wasn't from the US or Russia? Now it's because they are NATO weapons, right?

[summer holly]

doesn't matter.

[weary moat]

and guess what, new guns and especially belt fed lmgs will take a while

[summer holly]

what does that have to do with anything?

[weary moat]

not just that...

it's a low capacity "light mg" that isn't used by any of the for the game relevant factions and is also very old and weird

[summer holly]

so basically it fits into the LSW class

and is no less weird than a bullpup

[weary moat]

it's weirder lmao

[split sinew]

Exactly

[weary moat]

scar then too or what

[split sinew]

Well, it is a weapon that has been in service for years just like the Browning, don't expect a modern machine gun

[summer holly]

what does the scar have to do with anything?

LSW/LMG(both are actually the same thing, but eh)

[weary moat]

slow shooting, hard hitting, lower capacity...

[summer holly]

man nothing to do with the class, just you being an idiot, got it

LSW is an old name for a class of weapon that shared ammo with the riflemen.

thats it

that became the LMG in modern times

[weary moat]

i love insults as arguments

[summer holly]

not an argument, just a statement about your mental abilities.

[weary moat]

shows me that you don't have any arguments to bring up

[summer holly]

anyway, fits into the LSW class as we have it just fine

your only problem is "it looks weird" and "other guns do the same thin, maybe, in the future, possibly"

[split sinew]

And another discussion that is created by people who do not want new things for the game, it is better to leave the game as it is and it ends up dying, and on the tombstone we put "because of its community"

[weary moat]

nope, add things that fit

[summer holly]

alright lets remove all guns that are not 2010 on then

cause US and Russia don't use them

have to fit the theme right?

[weary moat]

strawman deez nuts

[summer holly]

your logic bud

either it fits US vs Russia

[split sinew]

Better yet, let's leave the weapons that only each class uses, like in Squad, better right?

[summer holly]

or it fits "modern"

which means in use post 1950.

[summer holly]

that must be what he is actually asking for

[weary moat]

this is just a dumb gun to add to bb
idk what to tell ya

keep on coping and seething but thankfully these are all just suggestions

[summer holly]

nah man, you're the one going around deciding if a gun "fits" even when it meets the devs criteria.

[split sinew]

Now you're going to tell Oki not to add this weapon because it's "rare" and if he does, you're going to say he's not listening to the community, right? hahaha

They want to revive the game but they don't accept changes, pathetic

[weary moat]

change =/= adding stupid shit

[weary moat]

1950s and onward
when was this "gun" (work of abstract art) made again?

[split sinew]

Or the best penis polisher in the world came to say what was stupid and not according to his criteria

[summer holly]

when was it used again?

[weary moat]

i can't even decipher what google translate tries to tell me there

[split sinew]

It's easy 🙂 come on I know you can, you don't have to go cry to Oki to make it easier to read this

[weary moat]

modern guns

[weary moat]

i legit don't know what you're trying to tell me

[summer holly]

when is it being used again?

[weary moat]

irrelevant.
is it modern?

[split sinew]

I give the example of the Browning again, so it must also be removed from the game

[weary moat]

no, it since it is an icon (the madsen is not)
and it has widespread usage (the madsen has not)
furthermore it's on vehicles (the madsen you suggest is not)

[split sinew]

"He's an icon" That's the most stupidly American thing I've ever heard, take it for yourself, average American.

So Battlebit's AK-74 is the communist icon?

[weary moat]

has the german role

[weary moat]

icon as in famous btw lol

[split sinew]

So only iconic weapons should be added to the game, right?

[weary moat]

not what i said...

[split sinew]

That's what you said, read your message carefully brother, then in that ideology we could put the Mosin Nagant for example

[weary moat]

you're so real rn brother i'm so sorry

[split sinew]

I only base myself on what you say brother, now if you write shit and you don't realize it, it's something else.

[weary moat]

brother i said something different to "only iconic guns should be in the game"
i defended the m2 being in the game because it is an icon (only one reason)

[split sinew]

and you gave like 3 different arguments why the madsen should not be there, first because it was not from any faction in the game, then because it was a weapon used by a country outside of NATO and now because it was not an iconic weapon Like Browning, stop humiliating yourself by giving increasingly stupid arguments, will you?

[weary moat]

nuh uh

you also skipped a few arguments

but hey, happens when you troll right?

anyways what are good reasons for this thing to be added

[split sinew]

Which ones did I skip?

[weary moat]

come on, you can do it, you learned how to read, brother

[split sinew]

I don't feel like reading shit, sorry 🙂

Which I will probably counter-argue anyway as I did with the rest of the argument you have given but oh well.

[weary moat]

"counter arguments" that don't counter anything
if you wanna proof that the madsen would be a good addition name me some good reasons

[split sinew]

@worthy stream He gave a good example, a weapon with a slow rate, but good damage, what else do you want apart from this?

[hazy dove]

Ngl madsen just looks silly af for a modern lmg

[split sinew]

I present to you the Maxim machine gun, a weapon that is more than 100 years old but is being used in the Ukrainian war.

And if we talk in a video game environment, I present to you the lever-action carbine from Battlefield 4 "Mare Leg"

[hazy dove]

I was just saying that the madsen looks silly af

[worthy stream]

considering the game we are talking about

a good argument against this would be ''it would take time modeling a new thought weapon when we have more than 10 to delivery already''

but outside of that there isnt that many reasons to not have it

[split sinew]

Exactly, for my part there is no problem, I wait

[worthy stream]

prob the only thing i can think of is that it is a 50 round lmg, correct me if im wrong

[split sinew]

It has 3 types of magazines, 25, 30 and 40 bullets, perhaps leaving the 30 and an extended 40 bullet.

[worthy stream]

and then kinda defeats some point of lmg, but bf1 exists with these types of lmgs and i think it can work or make it lsw idk

[worthy stream]

make it a drum and see what monstrosity the devs come up with

like

mg36 type of drum

[split sinew]

In Battlefield 1 it is a balanced machine gun, it works for short and medium ranges but it does not beat weapons that are really optimal combat at these distances such as submachine guns at close range or semi-automatic rifles at medium ranges, it has good hip and aiming precision, and if you want more You have the bipod, in short, it is a weapon that is useful if you see that the game is very volatile (they are constantly very defensive or offensive) or if you want to play as an infantry soldier, I will not comment much on the damage for Remember that BF1 just like BF3, and BF4 has damage based on caliber and other factors

[split sinew]

Better to leave it with the magazines it has hehe, maybe put a fictitious picatiny rail support for the grip and sights

In addition to the fact that nowadays we create picatinny mounts for any type of weapon.

[compact crown]

Ugly

[split sinew]

but functional

[hazy dove]

Still ugly af

[compact crown]

I don’t like ugly weapon

This game need mpx

[worthy stream]

mfs want to talk about what weapon is ugly or not when they want the most generic weapon

consume a drywall in this exact moment por favor

[split sinew]

The MPX is just an AR that fires pistol-type ammunition, bruh

[summer holly]

yeah its modern because its been modernized you idiot.

[split sinew]

I love how this entire discussion was formed just by adding 1 WEAPON

Not swinging, or anything like that, but for wanting to add 1 WEAPON

[summer holly]

his entire thing i still "it doesn't fit" despite it fitting in with the Devs own criteria.
He thinks it looks weird, but that doesn't matter as an argument anyway
he said it needed to be modern, then it had to US or Russian, then it had to be NATO, then it had to fit the theme
then if he made more arguments its just those but reworded.

[split sinew]

Welcome to the Battlebit feedback system where there is never anything new in the game because they make excuse after excuse

Just look at all the discussion they had to avoid saying "I don't like the gun"

In fact, now I understand better why Oki have to make a separate feedback group xd

[weary moat]

[summer holly]

at least you admit your shitty takes.

[split sinew]

what a waste of time

[weary moat]

exactly, trolling in shitty suggestions is always funny

[worthy stream]

ngl atleast bring an actual take instead of ''i dont like it''

[split sinew]

For you, any suggestion that is not yours is shit brother 💀

[split sinew]

lock brother this

@worthy stream which is the MPX and which is the Honey Badger

[weary moat]

hb

[weary moat]

mpx

[compact crown]

I don't like too late