🌀FINAL BALANCE🌀

[night tiger]

To know about this, I ask you to please read the notepad, thank you very much for your attention.

Balancing feature based on gauge and other aspects of Battlefield 1

Description of weapons from "World War 3"

Maps used as an example of "Battlebit"

"World War 3" conquest system

Mechanics of medics nearby and on the way to "Battlefield 1"

Wakistan with the marked part that grants a large "Battlebit" free zone

"World War 3" 3-shard life system

[lunar gulch]

You should try to use the Squad construction mechanic

You know, instead of giving birth your squad teammates, use the FOB system that squad uses

Some squads try to put this nearby the points

And the others try to capture objectives

Then all can respawn in a certain point

[night tiger]

Here I made the same notepad, but in a Word version for whoever likes it too

[night tiger]

In fact yes, but don't worry brother, let's go in parts

[fast stump]

i don't like caliber based damage and the other weapon balancing at all

how things currently are is fine

[night tiger]

Seeing how they have balanced things lately, it does cause some distrust, but if they do it well they would give different gameplay with each weapon of the same category, we have to have a little hope

[fast stump]

what is bad about the balancing?

[night tiger]

What's wrong with this brother?

[fast stump]

apart from obvious things such as attachments still being wonky and mags being 💀

[night tiger]

Well, it is a set of statistics that done poorly end up producing more "goals" or weapons that are better than others, the clear example of this would be the vector submachine gun, in its first months the game was released to Early Access, with a more sophisticated system. Normalized damage based on caliber would give good damage to each of the weapons (of course with certain exceptions explained of course in the post) without leaving any of them aside or less powerful than the previous one.

[fast stump]

vector was borked because of aimpunch and too good fall off...

and if damage was based of off caliber the vector would've been even more obnoxious with a 4sk

[night tiger]

And this is where the arcade formula comes to the rescue, since we are in an arcade environment you can easily balance the vector with more recoil and more dispersion at distance, making it the best submachine gun at close range.

With the arcade touch you have more possibilities of swinging weapons of course

[fast stump]

yeah nah fuck full arcade balancing

[night tiger]

Unlike the Insurgency Sandstorm vector 💀

[fast stump]

no thank you i don't need bf and coc balancing here

[night tiger]

haha okay brother

[dire kraken]

Go play battlefield clown

[night tiger]

Good arguments brother, they impressed me

[odd eagle]

BANZAI

[night tiger]

BANZAAAAAAI

[dire kraken]

As does your suggestion

[night tiger]

meh

[rain panther]

Weapon balance part is indeed interesting, but simply saying rework all weapons to have standard caliber based damage aint a simple task when you have so many weapons.

[quartz loom]

Rule 1: Be respectful, civil and welcoming.

We want our community to respect each other and avoid any form of discrimination, harassment or making the community uncomfortable.

Our full set of rules can be found in #rules

[night tiger]

Therefore, for my part, as long as they comply with that, taking their time to do it is no problem, but once done, it will simplify adding new weapons with their balance later on.

[urban thorn]

thread

[night tiger]

And why, brother, explain which points you thought were wrong and why?

[celest rapids]

Adding suppression to BattleBit is the day I stop playing, flinch mechanics are already bad enough.