#Increase time till losing squad lead

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

naive pendant
#

I have just been "You have been removed from squad lead due to lack of orders" while I was actually giving orders.

Picture this: Zalfibay 64v64, 3 flags.

We had Flag B and C while I had an attack order on Alpha, a guy just spammed "request squad order" with the obvious intention of stealing squad lead from me.

I would have needed to constanly re-order to attack alpha only to keep my squad lead? This is stupid.

#

Increase time till losing squad lead

heady glen
#

Kick them from your squad and if they rejoin to do the same shit, report for griefing

#

but tbh being able to kick annoyances whilst actively playing should be a thing.

wooden cliff
#

It takes about 2mins for you to lose SQL

naive pendant
wooden cliff
#

And that gives you plenty of time to kick him

naive pendant
#

because i am constantly tracking who requests squad orders, yeah right

dusky kite
#

it's already a pain in the ass to "steal" someones sql position
and holy shit if i wasn't able to take sql i'd probably disconnect every 5mins because usually sql are as braindead as everyone else...

wooden cliff
#

I mean it pops up to your left
Hit enter while alive then kick them

wooden cliff
naive pendant
#

did i just not expain the situation well enough or is this really that hard to grasp?

#

the situation in which this guy requested squad orders did not change at all, why would i get kicked then, that is stupid

wooden cliff
#

More it’s a silly suggestion that doesn’t amount to much

naive pendant
#

enemy: C
us: A, B
5 minutes pass
enemy: C
us: A, B

I would have lost SL there if I did not reapply the already existing order, if you fail to realize that this is stupid by design I cant do much

wooden cliff
#

They can only request every 2 mins
You can only lose sql if you don’t order a command within those 2mins

Now if you were saying
Someone joins my squad then their friend joins their party to steal my SQL
Then that would be an issue

But overall this is basically crying over something that you can easily fix and do yourself

naive pendant
#

removing the squad order only to apply it to the same really flag is stupid, no argument can defeat this

wooden cliff
#

Then remark site
Or kick the dude spamming lol

naive pendant
#

again, this is not really a "solution" but a bandaid at best

wooden cliff
#

No solution needs to be made
It’s all on your end

naive pendant
#

you should not be removed from squad lead due to "lack of orders" when the battlefield does not change

wooden cliff
#

I mean hey same system as BF4’s
No one complained about their squad system yet you could spam it there

naive pendant
#

you obviously fail to realize that little design flaw in that system ¯_(ツ)_/¯

dusky kite
#

only thing i hear is "yap yap yap yap"
like a trout

naive pendant
#

if you chat please speak in a language i can understand

stone badge
#

a bad squad leader could just mark a point and then go AFK, and you're saying, as long as that point never changes hands, nobody should be allowed to take over the squad leader role?

dusky kite
#

like a trout that actively harms my experience trusting in the sql to actually do shit

naive pendant
#

if the flags do not change whatsoever, why would I even need to give new orders, the old orders would still be valid

naive pendant
#

if any of the points we had now go "contested", surely i could give new orders, but if everything stays the same

stone badge
naive pendant
#

oh,

#

well yes

#

basically

dusky kite
naive pendant
#

come on man

wooden cliff
#

Then kick the dude requesting

naive pendant
wooden cliff
#

I mean that doesn’t even compare with a fucking video game xD

#

Hit enter

#

Kick

#

Takes less than 5 seconds

naive pendant
#

its called an analogy, but ok

wooden cliff
#

Why should oki waste his time on something so small and minuscule that players can solve themselves in under 5 seconds

stone badge
#

The way I see it is this
A: Nothing has changed, request order!
B: I have evaluated the battlefield again and yes, my order remains the same *reissues order*

This is preferable to
A: Nothing has changed, request order!
B: *crickets*

So yes, just reissue the same order if you're still intent on that flag.
And then kick the user if they continue.

wooden cliff
#

I mean BF4 had a 40 second timer
BBR has a 2min timer
Which game REALLY needs an increased time

naive pendant
wooden cliff
#

And again BF4 you could spam it within those 40 seconds easily filling the board
BBR once until 2mins are up or you get SQL

naive pendant
#

he is against my suggestion and gives reason why he is against it

cerulean vigil
#

If someone is trying to steal SL from me when I'm actually giving orders I kick them, it's not that hard

wooden cliff
#

I mean it’s just a useless suggestion

naive pendant
#

thats not the point, but you seem to be missing them left and right, its okay

cerulean vigil
#

Your complain is stupid when the solution is pretty simple, it's okay

dusky kite
#

imagine trying to make it harder for people who try to stop griefing of the team HyperXD

naive pendant
dusky kite
#

they still fucked up our game tho

naive pendant
#

interesting definition of griefing then

wooden cliff
#

theyre playing the game
not griefing xD

cerulean mortar
#

Many squad leaders didn't use the mechanics of the leader, and many of them don't listen their teammates, it's valid if someone wanna take the leader if their actual leader doesn't do anything

#

Many times I tell, please put a respawn beacon, or please mark this objective they simply doesn't care

hardy veldt
#

It's a super specific issue that you can fix by taking 5 seconds out of 2 minutes to kick the guy