Server hitreg today was awful

[oak kettle]

I would say I've played for about 6 or so weekends and it's been good -> decent cause obviously 127 people. However today it was absolutely unbearable. (127vs127 official servers) Shots would not register, shots that would register would take a second or two to give me the hit marker. When I would shoot it felt like nothing was happening to the other player. This was confirmed with my squadmates in comms that they too were having issues.

[neat oxide]

i thought i was trippin, shit was terrible

[topaz carbon]

I wouldn't say TERRIBLE, but I did notice it was weird sometimes. Like getting killed behind a wall half a second later.

[solemn lagoon]

registration was fine but some people would get hit behind walls, seems like some kind of server lag

was only really noticeable when running into cover and dying to a delayed shot

[oak kettle]

That's not the issue if you actually read what I said. If registration was fine why would i bring it up? come on guy.

[oak kettle]

Right? I thought so too til my friends confirmed they had the same thing. The wall a second later thing usually happens in this game tho, granted since its 127 people it's not gonna be perfect, just today was awful

ALSO bandaging was an issue. It would stop bandaging as if we had let go but we never had. Had to pickup people like 2-3 times today

[mild night]

Have understanding for it. Servers, cost a lot of money and time. We have to sup the devs. If we want it better. But can understand your frustration.

And point

[vivid parrot]

Seems like the server provider today had some sort of issue with performance, reducing the tickrate.

[grim horizon]

Had a few people saying my server was good (I host a community server)

Played one match of official servers and it was ehh

[clever sky]

I had no issues whatsoever.

And I am usually the one who says the hitreg was crap.

At very least, 32vs32 was flawless on the server I tried.

To the point where I managed to top score with FAMAS and Groza.

[oak kettle]

Clarified that it was the 127vs127 servers.

[oak kettle]

Thanks for commenting! That explains it then. Thanks man

[clever sky]

I know. Just odd that it was THAT different.

I'd assume they run on the same servers still. But who knows.

[oak kettle]

Not really, it's handling almost double the amount of total people. That's alot for most servers

[clever sky]

Isn't it like 4 times the amount?

[oak kettle]

Ya

lol xD

[clever sky]

Just weird how 32vs32 felt this stable to me, when sometimes it...doesn't.

Whatever issue the server provider had, it should have affected 32vs32 as well then...or not. Oh well