marsh canyon
I think the objectives should be in alphabetical order. A should be adjacent to B, and B should be adjacent to C, etc.
I find it confusing when I'm at a given objective (A), and intuitively it would make sense to think that we should be going to the next site in the sequence (B), but that objective is furthest one from it.
This is an issue on multiple maps.
upper lagoon
or just remove the map mechanic
I'm guessing it's a feature that's intended for hardcore and will be removed for casual as there is no squad coordination.
marsh canyon
or just remove the map mechanic
This wouldn't resolve the issue because the objectives would still be named out of order even if the map were removed.
upper lagoon
Sorry.. I thought you were referring to the line Squad B C D E F G... Not the point names. I don't see how it affects anything in a positive or negative way
marsh canyon
That's ok, it's a little confusing.
While this really isn't a game breaking thing, it's very unintuitive. If I get a notice on my HUD that the enemy has taken B, and I'm at A, rather than just going to the next objective site in sequence, you either have to: check the map, or turn the opacity of the objective flags up, which can cause issues with visibility.
small mist
I would be more confused if they swapped them
red totem
This is really annoying because of OCD, but I don't think it matters way too much. It's just a weird thing you can get used to.
marsh canyon
Adding a few examples from battlefield 4. Note how each objective name is sequenced in order.
marsh canyon
Just one more example. This is the current layout.
