#Remove The Fast-Reload Glitch
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

listen carefully to you

abuse 😱
Wait? What! 
Shit I do this all the time... I had no idea what an abusive person I am
The only thing I abuse is my sanity
it's not my fault that you can't understand basic things
quick reload was originally created with a weapon magazine loss penalty, but it is not here, making normal weapon reloading completely useless
🗿 you can't understand a simple, stupid joke
you have a strange idea about the meaning of this word
I can tell sarcasm from a joke
sure
Well, what if I need ammo for the long trip? Always a good idea to pick the empty mag on the ground. You never know.
I'm not asking the developers to not be able to pick up ammo again. I ask that you can't do it at the same time, since it makes normal reloading meaningless, and quick reloading, which is supposed to have one advantage and one penalty in the end, has only an advantage. It's also more realistic.
Daily reminder to ban leaf-boys from suggestions/feedback as an absolute bare minimum.
Yeah because you totally don't have to be stationary instead. 
That's your drawback there. Stationary and eyes on the floor.
If you just did a tactical reload and keep running, you'd be faster overall.
Though, of course, also potentially more dead due to being defenseless.
Yes you clown
at least 1 normal argument. This is true, but they also do this in a safe zone, the fact is that the usual reload is simply not needed by the game at the moment. Name at least 1 moment where a classic reload would be needed. There is this moment, this is when you don't want to stop. For example, if you're running away from a firefight (I don't think that often happens), in all other cases you are unlikely to reload in full view of the enemy, because it is much faster and smarter to get a pistol. Based on this fact, we understand that we reload most often behind cover and a quick reload in this case gives us an advantage and does not issue a penalty. It also looks unrealistic.
"Name at least 1 moment where a classic reload would be needed". When you need to run and reload but you want to retain the mag to refill it later, which is common situation for me at least
I'd say it's the most common
it doesn't break the game, but it shouldn't have been, and treating it as a feature in a game aimed more at hardcore and realism (except graphics of course) is illogical
but you do understand that you did a quick recharge while picking up the magazine will be faster, that's the point
No it's not
Name at least 1 moment where a classic reload would be needed
When I just flanked and want to bail without losing my mag.
🗿
I don't necessarily want to risk losing that magazine.
But may want to reload as I run away...doing the reload.
You need to stop to do that, but you don't need to with standard reload so it's faster
The quick reload with the drop and pick up is done when I think I am out of sight and no one is coming for me.
do you do this often? and the point is the advantage of those who shoot under cover
But that's certainly not a safe zone.
I CQC a lot, so yes.
For campers, it's hardly a concern.
if we take it in general terms, then this is not a problem, because everyone will do this and because of this there will just be a slightly different balance in the game, where the attackers will be a little more at a disadvantage, but not critically, the problem is more in realism
What
So there's no problem at all.
Because this isn't a milsim.
If you wanna talk realism, start with taking an RPG to the head and bandaging you back up.
🗿
in fact, it's hard to call it a problem even for realism, just a minor flaw in my understanding, I created this topic not as an alarm, but just my feedback
I didn't know, in my native language it's a little easier to perceive %)
I'll help out and suggest the title of "Remove The Fast-Reload Glitch" instead.
"Glitch" is relatively neutral.
And I suppose it's fair to say that it's more of a glitch.
Remove The Fast-Reload Glitch
👌
thx
May at least result in less harsh responses.
But people will still disagree.
I mean, I still do.
it's ok, it's just my opinion, no one is obliged to agree with it
Naturally