#politics
1 messages Β· Page 26 of 1

but regardless of outcome I'll continue to do what's required
ofc
worst-case scenario it's four more years of this
it'd be a long four years, but four years
im trying not to make that concession just yet
always gotta hope that whatever happens it'll be alright
and hope the right choice is made either way
on my way
can't?
logistics
but smol π¦
@RightWingWatch well sorry @Eminem for that. But that's the first instrumental track i thought about. https://t.co/5uce3N3GSP
1426
4098
So technically.. in a close election, if the incumbent president loses and his party has the most states, it's really important legally that the concession speech happens due to a flaw in the constitution.
Let's hope if he loses he doesn't exploit that.. :\
It's Day 35 of the US Election. Wisconsin is on its 13th recount. There's a different winner every time.
Nevada repeats its morning announcement. "Today we'll be done counting. This time for sure."
All contact with Pennsylvania was lost on Day 25. We don't talk about it.
907
6669
I think america is having the case of stupid.
I don't if they've called it yet but Perdue no longer has a majority in Georgia
Double runoff here we come
neither does trump. he's also now under the 50% mark which is big for biden
60k mail in ballots remain to be counted in georgia, well above the margin to give the race to biden
yeah Trump is only ahead by 19k, so if Biden gets a larger than majority portion of the 60k, he should theoretically win georgia
i think hed need like 2/3s to win.. but thats like plausible so
oh wow
never imagined that we might have a president actively trying to stop the electoral process
this is the world we live in
I don't care about the tweet
Am trying to understand the replies
Is somebody testing his botnet?
Some of the images are nsfw, some are just gore, then there are minecraft screenshots, all the same text
Like wtf
i dont usually either but wow
it's gotta be bots
it really does look like someone is just botnetting it or some shit
The accounts look legitimate, they have legitimate interactions
It's so weird
Wheres our twitter analysist?
@elder portal have you seen such strange spam comments by legitimate accounts before?
They all seem to come from brasil or smth
They seem to be chanting bloody mary and offering his flesh.
I can use google translate ^^
I know, but if someone else were looking and weren't as smart. Possibly any trump supporter in here, i just helped them out.
Apparently NC officials don't expect to get enough late absentee ballots back for there to be any chance to flip the President or Senate races
Oh hey Democrats flipped a House seat in NC so Republicans are only +6 now
To be fair I was expecting NC to go to Trump anyway. But it was close.
Thursday at noon EST
So... 45 minutes from now we will get some new results
Nevada is kinda sus
lol
yeah
vegas is blue
all of the cities are blue actually
the big ones at least
and biden is starting to catch up in pensylvania
100k votes almost exclusively for him in the last day
Iirc somebody said biden wins if he gets 40% of the remaining votes
That's still kinda close
Ppl say it was called too soon
some are worried about it because AZ already has a history of mail-in ballots so unlike a lot of places, mail-in ballots could also be from republican voters
So Reps are pro Corona?
lol
0_0
they just dont think it actually has any effect so they have superspreader event protests about lockdown
Nevada numbers starting to update finally, biden lead grows
Yeah, if trump wins all except GA
But pretty unlikely
Not sure that would happen....
It wouldn't
And no, the last thing this country needs right now is more chaos
Of course you'd be fine with more chaos, you clearly aren't affected by the consequences of this election which you've made abundantly clear
Iβm not looking for more chaos. Im looking to make sure the Ds donβt have pres, house, and senate all at once
Nah, senate will probably have to wait until January to find out
If the GA senate race leader gets below 50, itβll have to wait until a runoff in January
So itβs possible that both GA senate seats will have special elections in Jan.
And it still matters because in 2022 there will be a handful of R seats up for grabs.
They need to be positioned for that in the WH and House
Gets to 50* or below. All you need for a majority is 50% +1 vote.
50.00001% of the vote will have him win
is GA even possible to change? 98% reporting with 12k difference
yes there are still 50k votes to count and trump is only up by 14k
I love how in some states Republican voters are chanting "Stop the count!" and in others it's "Keep counting!"
Depending on who has the lead, of course lol
I mean, if you gonna start rigging the election, you gotta do it in all states that are battlegrounds ^^
Welp turns out Nevada is a shitshow
They accidentally sent almost 600 ballots to people who shouldn't be able to vote but they've already taken them out of the envelopes so they don't know which ones they are
F
And I thought the whole election was a shit show
Yeah, Trump campaign files a lawsuit saying deceased and people unable to vote voted in NV.
It's not enough to change the election but it sounds like it's going to put a freeze on things while they wait for the courts to settle things
lmao PA is gonna be done counting before NV
Canβt votes still come in in PA until like Nov 12?
yeah but itll be pretty obvious who won hopefully today
Allegheny county said they arenβt reporting any more results until tmrw. Thatβs Pittsburgh
perdue has fallen under 50%
PA at this point is looking likely that biden will win, the ratio has been consistently very strong towards him
Assuming that doesn't change, which it certainly could, he'll win pretty handily
I don't understand why this is a thing https://twitter.com/KellyO/status/1324372366974160897
Trump campaign manager says βDonald Trump is alive and well
602
4754
Maybe he meant to say his chances or his campaign are alive and well?
why what is a thing
lmao, trump just up and fucking dies as his campaign loses
i would honestly be speechless
I guess we are past the point where we still don't laugh at political opponents deaths
We still waiting on NV?
and the 4 other states
yeah i know its wrong but at a certain point i am sick of acting like this man deserves any modicum of respect
yeah gaps are closing in all the states at this point
not alaska... π
still only 56% vote in there, idek how they count votes in northern alaska
people don't really have addresses there even
Husky sleds
they get their local moose to take the ballot box to anchorage
the alaksa state police assigns a single trooper to cover hundreds of square miles with his plane...
its a different way of living for sure
@near glen you talking about the "make republicans cry" Twitter accounts that spam the same message over and over?
Oh hey vote counts are going up
the comments where filled with it
Georgia is like 12K wtf
the fact that it comes back that well-written makes me think it was translated to begin with
now its all the same image, before there were tons of tweets with the same message (or similar) but different pictures
like this https://i.imgur.com/6hQUUxb.png
but sometimes not even closely election related
I just happened to be looking at the comments right after it was posted
guessing it's all one person or small group using/abusing the Twitter API
seems those don't get much traction
The latest Tweets on Υ‘ΦΥ΅ΥΈΦΥΆΥΈΥΏ Υ΄Υ‘ΦΥ«. Read what people are saying and join the conversation.
that's pretty normal for any service opening themselves up for bots
That picture looks so real itβs scary
Prolly is.
dick size was looking legit for sure π
Baby carrot
ahhhh, all those photos are YT thumbnails
I recognized one as Charlie
holding his giant schlongs
funny youtuber
Bruh
what on earth did i open this too
it's a combination of YT thumbnails and some subreddits
so, some automatic scraping and some manually-added images
so maybe just a funny group of ppl
basically, yes
the best img I saw was a nice dick, that was literally one fire
you haven't seen Charlie and his 3-foot wieners?
no thanks
I wanna keep my recommendations clean
lmao
I have seen this guys face before
Trumpβs lead in Georgia shrank to 13,540 votes on Thursday afternoon. The secretary of state said that about 50,000 votes now remain uncounted
Going to be ridiculously close
Crazy
oop in the midst of this, ethiopia's going to war
NV is 12k
inb4 finishing within margin of 100 votes
Presidential: https://i.imgur.com/4MbMcVE.png
not presidential: https://i.imgur.com/8vgu4xK.png
I mean
this keeps happening
just stop the fraud it's not so hard smh .
lmao
I posted another pair last night
I'm just picking most recent stuff
if you look at tweets over the last two days there's instances of this all over
another lawsuit just got dissmissed, in georgia
Biden says things about unity and not hating eachother, Trump says something about hate
this is not hard to see
I hope this all turns out okay
i have never wanted something to turn out okay so bad
I'm gonna laugh really hard at y'all if you fuck this up. Like...
the president all-caps tweeting for an hour terrifies me
because the man all-capsing for the last hour has the nuclear launch codes
STOP COMPLAINING ITS JUST A BUTTON AWAY TO START SCREAMING SMH
I'm being yelled at by the man with the power to end me
He probably won't if he doesn't loose.
if I were sitting here all-capsing for an hour I'd be muted or banned
and told I need to step away from the keyboard
rightly so
because I would
LET'S TRY IT
so; clearly someone needs to step away for a while
Pls top yelling. It's hurting my feelings.
estimations have something to do with it
but who really knows how counting works
logistically, counting millions of ballots across various issues seems.. Difficult, to put it mildly
I can imagine there's some complications along the line
really, when was the last time you counted to 331 million? Several times?
I mean
there's thousands of people doing the counting
and machines are part of the process
which makes it all the more difficult, in some cases
I assume verifying the votes is what takes most of the time
multiple people counting to very large numbers
gotta communicate very well
basically I'm saying I can imagine there's a lot that goes in behind the scenes that makes counting all of these very difficult
F ur vote then
another trump lawsuit in michigan dismissed. only orally, will be dissmissed in writing tomorrow
yeah, it was a bit of a challenge trying to ensure my signature matched when I put it down in the DMV years ago
makes mail-ins very difficult
which is intentional
yeah california set themselves up to count very quickly and it paid off
not that they were a swing state, but yeah
basically they were able to do a lot of the admin of handling mail-in ballots before the election, so everything was ready to go and they were able to count millions of votes in just a few hours
the added pressure of deciding who wind for NV can't make things any easier
irrelevant, they show a model for how it can be done successfully in other states
imagine being asked to count millions of ballots as angry, armed Trump supporters wait outside and the world is waiting on you
I'd die
I would absolutely keel over
I feel so, so bad for those counters
they're going to need help after this election
someone set them up with free counseling for at least a few months
i dont think it will go red
AZ is almost certainly not going to flip red
but crazier things have happened
like losing the popular vote but winning the EC.. Five times.
yeah lol
kinda funny when you realize in the past 32 years republicans have only won the popular vote once
remember: the longer this goes on the bluer everything gets
large cities and mail-ins take more time
and are more likely to be democratic
your ideal scenario is Trump winning
my ideal is biden landslides this
a tie is even less likely
a tie would require nv and arizona dropping red, and biden taking georgia
I don't remember a tie ever happening in history, although it's talked about every election
all of which are unlikely
i think as proven by trump, executive has significantly more room to do shit than we used to see
that's not how any of that works
Lolol
Yeah it would DEFINITELY be Biden who would get us a in a war
It definitely isnβt the senate who declares war
one of the most moderate men to have ever run for president preaching peace in the country.. Definitely very likely to start a war
Thatβs not grammar homie thatβs not understanding the governmental system of our nation
- I'mma need proof of that claim
uhhhh oppress civilians
- Trump absolutely has started conflict
positive claim and all that
burden of proof applies
...can you name a single peace deal
I'm still looking for proof that every other president, except for Trump, has started a war or conflict
and yes trump has overseen many military operations as president
unless you count abandoning allies and leaving the nuclear deal in the middle east, i haven't exactly seen a lot of peace
Remember that you have to remain civil
no you see, I do pay actually pay attention to what's actually going on and I'm distinctly aware that trump has done a damn thing to promote peace
One thing i do not really see in correlation with Trump supporters is civility, recently i've seen them show up at poll stations with weapons and shouting contradictory statements.
βLaw and order presidentβ
I mean, i just recently read they did that.
that's been their thing
Jon Ralston, an expert in Nevada politics, has stated he does not see any path to victory for Trump in NV
I'm referencing the 2016 elections, in my claim
I'm waiting for proof that every other president started conflict or war, and Trump never did
not that Trump did peaceful things
that was your claim
so; proof, plox
none of those countries were at war with eachother lol
BUT, Proxi he did not make them start a war with each other and prevented future wars. Therefor gud president, let's forget about everything else.
Those deals actively attacks Palestine
so at the very least Trump is not the only president to not go to war
Gerald rudolph seems like a chill guy
Great peace you got there
PA secretary of state claims we could know results by the end of the day
Well they love Israel
because jesus, mainly
ah yeah religion, the most common cause of conflict it seems
https://girlsare.life/AV3iMyC.png demon's the uninformed voter btw
yeah, president is commander in chief
i just dont get why you think hed start one? like
Well, not for extended periods of time he canβt. Thatβs the ridiculous authorization for use of force in the Middle East both sides keep passing
@plush crypt I don't recall ever stating trump declared war
though that does refute your earlier claim that Biden can't start a war without a democratic congress @autumn lotus
The US has ever declared war like 4 or 5 times in history
but getting sidetracked
but they actively engage in armed conflict constantly
I mean he called you uninformed a second ago, Demon
oh, gotcha
And I'm faiiirly sure the Vietnam war wasn't actually a war with the US, just a proxy-war?
technicalities everywhere
yup, it was never a "war"
They weren't peace deals
yeah
even though it lasted like what 12 years?
no, not peace deals
they were talks that accomplished nothing and further added to the Israel-Palestine tension
that's what's being referenced
which is one of the hottest areas in the middle-east right now
The Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas reacted immediately with a riposte that it was the "slap of the century"
I mean
sounds peaceful
sounds like they definitely wanted those "peace deals"
Since this somehow has to be stated: I don't support the military operations Obama did either, and nor would I support military operations that Biden does as president
The claim that Trump has been some savior of peace though is absolutely absurd and unfounded
I wouldn't say I wouldn't ever support military action, but it would be unlikely
there's a time and place, and it's almost no time or place
"put down isis"
You know ISIS still exists right
he probably put isis down the same way he condemned white supremacists
Some isis leader was killed it seems
some brief history on them and Trump
If that was the attack on Iran that was a very, very bad move and was extremely highly likely to start another war, and may well lead to that still
I guess if you just believe Trump beat ISIS then it's all better
On 31 October, ISIL media announced Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi to be Baghdadi's successor.
they have a new leader
it's a form of governance
hard to kill those
When talking about terror orgs then are never 100% gone. ISIS doesnβt have any land holdings anymore. That was their main source of income.
Yeah, that was the main issue with the attack. It accomplishes little because they will just name a new leader
it was definitely a blow
it also wasn't entirely the US, and it definitely wasn't entirely Trump
Ok... they have no land right now... better that then having land now.
it's been going on since 2009
It wasn't even mostly the US
yeah
It was nearly entirely handled by the countries themeslves
Snopes says Obama/Trump did roughly half each of US portion of rolling back isis
I can believe that, yeah
the only thing the US has ever done for the middle east is sell weapons and destabilize
And Bush created it, sounds about right
operations were well underway when Trump took office
basically, Trump claims to have ended ISIS entirely
that's not the case at all
it's wrong on many levels
- He didn't do much
- The US didn't do a lot
- We didn't end anything
- They'll be back
it's reduced heavily, yay for that
that's what we've got
that's where we're at
Well it looks like he did half. It ended their main/only really, source of income
Theyβll be back
That doesnβt really matter? They donβt have land now. Is it better if they had land? No. Theyβll always be back, in another form, under a different name, thatβs how the Middle East works.
Which is why the US shouldnβt be there in the first place
perhaps he did half of the US portion, but still not a lot compared to what's already been going on
think about it like this:
You're making a sandwich. You bought the ingredients, you put everything in place, opened the containers, and started putting the sandwich together.
Some rando comes along and says, "here, let me help you with that!"
You say, "uhh.. Okay, I guess? Weirdo."
they put the two halves of the sandwich together, spill your ingredients on the floor, and then proclaim to everyone else around you that they made your sandwich for you
that's what the US did
they didn't even bother to put mayo or mustard on your sandwich. It's just dry π¦
you can't say it wasn't somewhat helpful, because it sort-of was, in a weird way, but that's not really what you wanted
plus now you've got a mess to clean and your "helper" just poofed
I donβt think thatβs accurate? Where you getting this info that the US didnβt play a large role in getting rid of isis?
ISIS is a form of government. It's been around since 1999
we didn't even start looking at it until 2009
and didn't start acting until years later
That in no way addresses my question
They didn't matter until we wrecked Iraq and then Syria
basically they've been fighting- and being fought- since their inception
we "helped", sort-of, kind-of
Did other people act before us? Who? When?
When did they become powerful enough for those other actors to care? I donβt now these things and google isnβt being helpful rn. I cant seem to find articles talking about who contributed to downfall of isis.
but we certainly didn't do a majority of anything
In November 2006, shortly after the group's rebranding as the "Islamic State of Iraq", it established the Al-Furqan Foundation for Media Production, which produces CDs, DVDs, posters, pamphlets, and web-related propaganda products and official statements.[259] It began to expand its media presence in 2013, with the formation of a second media wing, Al-I'tisam Media Foundation, in March[260][261] and the Ajnad Foundation for Media Production, established in January 2014, which specialises in acoustics production from a nasheed, quranic recitation.
so they really started getting attention around '06
I've seen it
Lol whoops
Meant to copy another link
The registrar in Clark County (Las Vegas) said the county would release the next batch of votes around noon ET on Friday. Remaining votes include mail and provisional ballots.
What the fuck are they doing, why is this taking them so long
it's taking longer this year due to an increase in voter count as well as abolishments of things like counting machines
This timeline makes it sound like ISIS was growing until this US-lead coalition started airstrikes in 2004
Right, cause as we know, the federal government is in charge of state voting.
the federal gov't elects those in charge of the USPS
who then order counting machines to be tossed
specifically talking about Trump hiring Lousi DeJoy
who then ordered those machines tossed
until he was told to stop by the other branches of the fed gov't
he cited making attempts to thin out the USPS and cut the fat, but he's also strongly republican and very strongly in favor of Trump
the man in charge of a largely democratic voting system
we knew this
Pretty sure those were sorting machines... USPS doesnβt have anything to do with counting.
sorting, my apologies
back to ISIS for a second, I was disputing the claim that Trump had claimed he single-handedly eradicated ISIS which was wrong on many levels
it's at least wrong in that he did it by himself
You said the βUSβ in place of trump several times then.
in some cases, yes, because I was lumping several presidents together
we also didn't do a lot as a nation, but really the whole thing falls apart at even the fact that it's been going on pre-Trump
I donβt think thatβs accurate? Where is that source that we didnβt do a lot as a nation? I canβt find that info.
for one, there were other countries involved
it depends on your definition of "a lot" and also what timeline you choose to use
we weren't the only airstrikes, for example
not by a long shot
fucking hell, I didn't know Candians were involved in this
TIL
man, you know you fucked up when you've pissed off the Canucks
Itβs not simple active military engagements. Who provided supplies to neighboring countries, who proved operational support, enforced no-fly zones, etc.
basically, if you're looking at 2014-present then yeah, the US did a fair amount. I'd argue still not close to all of it
but again, also depends on your definition of "a lot" - quantifying is hard
but ISIL/ISIS was founded in 1999
so it depends on the timeline, too
and started becoming active in '06*
The US didnβt do a lot -> the US did a fair amount
Are those equal?
really depends on the definition
What was happening before 2014 militarily?
I try to avoid using words that put me in a corner, like "everything", "nothing", or "100%"
I wish others did the same
In that wiki article, I canβt find mentions of military operations pre-2014
makes arguments harder to defend
because all you have to do is attack the amount, which is usually subjective
then it invalidates the entire argument, no matter how robust the rest is
Cause your sandwich analogy makes it sound like it was already going great in the fight against ISIS before the US got there, is that what you meant?
to be fair, I skipped over the fact that many other countries have been helping for a long time
in the analogy
I was focused on US vs ISIS
if you add every detail into an analogy it becomes tedious
and no longer analogous
Right, and I donβt see other countries fighting isis pre-2014 which is when US entered the fight
Iβm scrolling through all the interventions in that wiki page you linked
mhm, other superpowers started helping around 2014
So who was making the sandwich before the US came along?
the countries affected, and I thought a few others were helping
but maybe not
you can make your own damned sandwich π
apparently I'm wrong in that other countries have helped before the US
my argument still stands, though- Trump wasn't elected in 2014 either
this was all pre-Trump
though that particular point seems less valid
at least from my own initial research, knowing almost nothing about the conflict
experts on the subject would have a better understanding of who and how and when
I am no expert
I just know that Trump definitely cannot claim the entire victory for himself like he seems to have done, and which for some reason his supporters continue to parrot
(this originally started from BASKET parroting that same narrative)
they started their media campaign in '06, and their large reach started in '14
according to Wiki
they were founded in '99
the US took notice in '09 and military operations started in '14
with other countries following suit sometimes years later
just putting down some facts
they started really growing in '06, but they exploded around '14 apparently
yeah, took from '14 to now to get them down to a small size again
also they still have a leader
because again, for of government. Can't kill an idea
yep
very unlikely
I'm assuming that was a joke
I can't tell with you
also assuming that was a joke
because that's not exactly how any of that works
idk basket, your reasoning sound like we should just carpet nuke the middle east right? i mean whats the difference
any sentence starting with "why don't we just.. ?" - especially when dealing with military of politics, you need to be VERY weary of
because life isn't simple
also, assuming they're all in caves
you watch too many action movies
a few people lives in caves around the world
who'd thunkit
what I see is an explosive going off in an area with an unknown number of people around it, of unknown origin or sentiment
woo boy.
too much hollywood
I'm revoking your movie permit. You're only allowed to watch Clockwork Orange from now on
and The Godfather
because ISIS only lives in caves, and the only people living in caves are ISIS
I'm out
I tap out
MOAB isn't super efficient for caves, better for towns or cities
Yeah it will, but cave systems can be vast, think they have better options if I recall
MOAB is the largest non-nuclear bomb to date, they're very expensive
Aviation Thermobaric Bomb of Increased Power (ATBIP; Russian: ΠΠ²ΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΡΠΌΠ½Π°Ρ Π±ΠΎΠΌΠ±Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΠΠΠΠ), nicknamed "Father of All Bombs" (FOAB; Russian: "ΠΠ°ΠΏΠ° Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π±ΠΎΠΌΠ±", "ΠΠ²Π±"), is a Russian-designed, bomber-delivered thermobaric weapon.
The bomb is reportedly s...
Well sure, in Syria we were launching as many missiles and dropping as many bombs as Russian has in their whole arsenal on something like a weekly basis
Indicator MΠΠΠ[13] FΠΠΠ[14]
Mass: 10.3 tonnes 7.1 tonnes
TNT equivalent: 11 tons (22,000 lb) β44 tons (β88,000 lb)
So they're claiming 4 times the yield from less explosive mass.
Yeah but 50% of the people there won't all vote for the same person
And who cares how much or little land they take up anyway?
Also it looks like the constitution has a flaw that allows an incumbent president to maneuver things in a way that triggers the house to have to vote in the next president based on congressional delegation.
You'd need to find a map that shows the smallest map that gets you enough Democrats or enough Republicans to not care about the rest of the country
I bet it'd cover at least 1/3 of the country
Well I think there are multiple ways this can be done, but basically if two groups of electors show up for a state, and there is not a single candidate left after concession speeches, it almost immediately triggers the vote to be based on congressional district.
It would be probably the worst thing any president could do.
Which idea?
NPVIC
did you not even watch the video what
Yeah to be honest you guys should probably not be picking candidates based on how well they do in Iowa
(I'm in Iowa)
How do you feel about the EU? π
Think the EU is a hot mess, but good in theory.
The EU works about the US did before the Civil War but without a military (coming soon) so if our system is so great why do so many Americans look at the EU as a disaster?
16th?
I'm not an American FYI.
17th
I look specifically about the fine print of product regulations and can see what they were trying to do but see that it's very impractical.
That's an argument against what they're doing, I usually see people argue about the system itself
Usually by complaining it's not run by people the countries elected
Yeah I think the product regulations, specifically food industry ones, are destructive
I think this is just an argument Americans picked up via watching Brexit but yeah
Congress is the one that certifies the EC vote so they could still toss the extra set
I dislike the EC and the fact the EU means a large portion of the country isn't run by those elected.
Actually that would be unconstititional
Which is part of the flaw in the constitution
It's basically a constitutional coup waiting to happen, needs patching ASAP
Oh, I listened to this guys video let me show you
Visit http://TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.
If the 2020 US presidential election is close, the race could drag on in the courts and halls of Congress long after ballots are cast, says lawy...
States are basically allowed to decide how they want their EC delegation to vote
The EU doesnt work as well as many appear to see it. It was originally a trade bloc for Europe that evolved overtime into a federal like government. @foggy fern The problem with you comparing pre-civil war US to current EU doesnt make much sense, and both have very wildly different ways of managing "states". The EU also has a lot more cogs in its decision making process
nevermind the EU is parked within the wealthier nations
plus the EU's capital rotation is just insane...
says the people who cant make fly by states blue other than arizona
What? No, flyover country is the Midwest
But really, I dont think a popular vote is a great idea. Compared to other countries, at least we vote for the president, abeit not directly
that statement doesnt make sense
I think he's talking about parliamentary systems
why is the will of the people at a federal level electing the president who is in charge t a federal level not a good idea?
we use PV for other seats
the whole entire point of the EC has been destroyed, its now doing more harm than it was trying to fix
republicans want the EC because they know that they are outnumbered and its their only chance anymore
Might want to get your gun ready, would be time to stand up for Democracy and overthrow the coup government.
sadly the left is scared of guns, im a minority on the left π¦
It's a loophole in the constitution, not intended to be used in this way.
@small root under an election based on popular vote, swing states wouldnt be a thing anymore
cities can and will control everything under that system
The governor can already technically do that.
on cities being able to control the election: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3wLQz-LgrM
they would not
4 minutes, 42 seconds
it's an easy watch
its not about cities vs rural, its amount percent of the population who wants their views represented as a whole
why is majority rule acceptable for almost everything in voting except this?
votes are suppose to calculate ensuring the majority of the votees views are satisfied
yes, so take the vote ona national level, its exactly whats being a rgued for!
right now you have millions of voters whos vote doesnt matter.
I come at this from a slightly different angle. Realistically the presidential power mostly comes from Congress which is decided by PV already. I think some changes to the EC have to take place, but I doubt debating if we should abolish it is very useful, since it'll probably never happen.
Imagine if minecraft was updated based on popular opinion... We wouldn't have survival anymore because the few big servers would have voted out those aspects. The other 99.9% of us would be forced into what the few big one wanted. That's why the EC is a thing..
more presidential/unpresidential tweets, brought to you by the men themselves
Presidential: https://i.imgur.com/fIC4Qka.png
Unpresidential: https://i.imgur.com/DCM1OoT.png (RT'd by Trump)
thats a horrible and nonsensicle analogy billy
for one, survival is more popular anyways
@elder portal would a president not be against voter suppression if it was a thing?
Only one half of Congress is democratic. The other half is fundamentally designed to be undemocratic, with less populous states having equal voting power in the Senate as more populous ones.
Or if they believed it was happening?
I think that a fair chunk of people don't care about "presidential"-ness
thats a horrible and nonsensicle analogy billy
@weary obsidian it's an analogy meant to show a point :/
didnt show any point though
If can't make a point if it's wrong
@shut vine it's not a good look for the current president, at all
Ffs, I give up
this is not how you lose with grace
I mean, the differences in the levels of Congress makes a lot more sense than the executive.
he hasn't lost yet tho
You need checks and balances.
Single player and realms are more popular than whatever you guys are doing π
nevermind u rite
that analogy is more in line with "should a private company let the public vote on how they should run the company, vs lettting the company run it out of their own decisions using their expertise"
but he is behind, and his tweets are very upsetting
they are bad tweets
Lets assume for a second the popular vote elects an actually totalitarian party, those laws can be effectively blocked by either level of Congress.
not befitting of someone who should be a role model
that analogy is more in line with "should a private company let the public vote on how they should run the company, vs lettting the company run it out of their own decisions using their expertise"
@weary obsidian it was a simple concept, not my fault you want to tear it apart with semantics
Yeah, I think the executive branch does have way to much power bestowed to it, nevermind some unaccountable departments with in it outside of oversight
@shut vine it's not a good look for the current president, at all
@elder portal Well, I agree, if he is JUST doing it because he's losing, then it's ungraceful. However, let the courts decide, if he's right, then it's good that he's trying to stop injustice.
I believe he's just doing it because he's losing, but, I trust in the judiciary to handle it.
I trust the system enough to handle something like this, yeah
The concern shouldn't be around that process, but around the electoral delegation process at this point.
I don't trust that he's doing this in good faith
it's not befitting of a president or leader
but this is our leader
What is he doing? I haven't been paying attention (it's still too early to invest my cares)
currently
Yeah, I agree if my opinion of what is actually happening is correct.
He's encouraging people to report voter fruad if they see it last I saw
He's spreading doubt in the validity of the election.
I've been posting tweets by Trump and Biden for the last couple days, comparing tweets hours apart
Well, again, if stopping the count is what the law says
basically Trump is acting like a sore loser, a child
Then the count should stop, so, we trust in the judiciary.
But pretty sure it's not, and he's just spreading doubt.
this is not behavior befitting of a leader
do you want to name another president for me that did this imabasket?
fuck that excuse
do you want to name another president that did this?
fuck it to hell
cause i want to see another president that has acted this way
Butchering the terms like packing the court.
and I donna think it means what you think it means
no, packing means adding more seats
That was not packing in any capacity?
That's not packing.
I saw republicans cheating and adding fake Republican ballots to NC votes! Republicans cheated NC! /s
see? anyone can make a false statement without evidence
being kind, inclusive, or a good winner or loser has nothing to do with being "your average candidate"
you can be a good human being
STOP THE NC FRAUD !!!
The only thing that's crazy is that both parties will scream that it's not the time to do it in the last year when you're not on the seat
Correct, which is why we have to leave it all up to judiciary.
There probably isn't enough evidence even if foul play went on.
its pathetic to make baseless accusations without evidence
And there probably wasn't enough if there was any at all to change the election result.
Yeah I agree, also he looks desperate either way by the way he's doing it
were not going there
ad hominem attacks are ineffective when called out
Yeah, trump's tweets are dumb. We've all know this for years. Nothing new lmao
I actually agree, what they did to Kavanaugh was disgusting.
Well, it is a mess to begin off with, considering the lack of some standard set by the federal government. Nevermind with mail in ballots still arriving in some states, I just see this being pushed to the courts due to the length of time this is going to take
Yeah it's in the past, he's confirmed, time to move on.
if a person got their vote in by nov3rd, its not their fault for postal delays (now, sure they shouldnt of waited until last minute, I agree). the vote should be counted
Yeah, legislative and executive really should have sat down and decided on standards for this election considering the nature.
now I'll admit NC's deadline is a bit extreme
I agree, however I also agree we can't just wait forever for the votes to come in.
you dont if the race isnt close enough
If x voted by mail, and it hasn't arrived yet, that should not hold the election to ransom.
but if it is, those votes matter
Mail in ballots was a mistake, tbh. Let's be real. Everyone should have just gone to the booth like every year, then we most likely wouldn't be in this mess
What I am saying is that people should have mailed it in back in late sept/early october
no, mail i nballots isnt the issue, the mistake was allowing them to be post marked by nov 3rd
yes
they need to just set the deadline 7 days before
Well, I sort of agree with the idea that there was already a process established for this via absentee ballots.
stop allowing people to procastinate
they should have been postmarked a week before
Why did we invent a new process that does the same thing, effectively?
Of course it's going to get fucked up.
mailin IS absentee
provisional is the other type, which is "not sure if this is a valid vote"
We need to stop being lenient within our election deadlines
We need to stop being lazy and just show up to the booth
Did you get your ballot automatically or did you have to apply for it?
Im fine with applications being mass mailed
That's the process that is questionable to me.
Yeah, me too.
Yeah, which is why they should have applied en masse for their absentee ballots.
Also maybe if there was a national holiday so everyone can actually take the time to do it, that'd be great too. Otherwise not everyone is able to show up in person.
@upper steppe unnecessary exposure to others. were gonna see hell in 2 weeks I bet.
mail in works just the same as in person if people dont fucking procastinate
ballot harvesting should also be illegal, and USPS should provide a secured drop off
can be from early voting james
Yeah, as you get more cases the curve is going to sharpen. Also yea could be.
@upper steppe unnecessary exposure to others. were gonna see hell in 2 weeks I bet.
@weary obsidian eh, you say that, but when I went I didn't come into contact with anyone. They had strict regulations to keep everyone spaced out, etc. It was akin to standing in like be at the grocery store during this pandemic. We all do that already..
Though do they do voting early 2 weeks ahead?
I don't. I order my groceries.
Snowflake because I choose to keep myself and others safer?
The numbers from today are mostly going to be infections from nearly 2 weeks ago.
Yeah okay.
speaking of mail in ballots, I wonder if my tax return forms ever arrived at the IRS
snowflake for not wanting to get a relatively unstudied virus π€
that has indications of vascular damage π€
We haven't even touched the surface on the long-term implications of recovering from COVID lol
and increased risk of getting a stroke for a month after recovering π€
and what else?
brain fog?
Here we go. I opened my mouth. Let the lynching begin
yea, well when you diminish the virus' effects on people
dude you called him a snowflake for not wanting to get it
how is that NOT diminishing the virus?
@upper steppe standing in line for hours, not knowing if someone coughed at the booth before you, some locations prob had closed doors you had to touch doors, dunno how pens was handled but usually voting booths have the pens on a chain.
Hours?
its all out of the normal exposure points
I was there 2 minutes
yes not everyone had that experience
our waiting lines at some locations hit multiple hours
It's almost like you end up with a different experience when each county manages it separately.
Shocking, that.
All of those are equally anecdotal but okay
well the point of it is some people will be at an increased risk
while others wouldn't be
its still all exposure you get zero of by voting by mail. the only negative to voting by mail is fear of republicans
Deliberate congestion is a voter suppression tactic, let's not pretend we're ignorant to that fact.
worrying if they are gonna destroy your ballot
They even gave me a finger condom that I didn't know what was for at first. I looked at the lady that handed it to me and was like "that's too small"
I mean I agree, should have just kept the absentee process the same, people can apply for them
Instead of sending ballots to last known addresses, which at least in some instances have been completely wrong
i didn't have to wait when i voted either, but I did see pictures online of people standing in fairly long lines
well, didn't wake up to red hell so that's good at least
In some places they limit the number of polling places to deliberately make it harder for people to vote.
my area didnt auto send ballots, but a local org sent forms to request it and they delivered it to local elections office
In some places they limit the number of polling places to deliberately make it harder for people to vote.
@cosmic badge that's shitty :(
Some places just don't have the resources.
@upper steppe its your boys doing it
Here they turned every public school into a voting place. All the kids got to stay home that day to minimize exposure
specially texas
Yeah I like that process Aikar
And yes it's largely Republicans doing this in black counties.
hes not republican he said yesterday just to be clear
When people get ballots not meant for them, that makes me cringe
@upper steppe its your boys doing it
@weary obsidian right... Cause I'm a republican, hmm? I've told you countless times I'm not one.. lol
well i didnt see you say that, but fine "The people you voted for"
I set my Twitter dashboard to update every minute instead of every hour. Something I should have done earlier. Enjoy sentiment analysis and tweets as they come in, in real time
Pretty sure the people I voted for turned all the public schools into voting places instead of what byteflux said
Not sure what you're on about, aikar...
Nice, same here
But Southern states are particularly guilty of suppression by means of restricting polling places and times.
Republicans actually saw a surge in black support.
Looking at raw numbers or %?
Maybe has something to do with them actually being not black? "If you don't vote for me, you ain't black"
Probably because they see through bidens fake personality. Biden reminds me of the old guy at a high school party trying to fit in, but just can't lmao
I mean easy to say that because turnout was really good, but curious how much better it was relative to last election
Both % and raw numbers increased from previous from what the NY times said
I can see the 1994 crime bill controversy weakening Biden's black vote too
Tbh I see both parties as mostly the same, I think there's a growing minority in America seeing that. I think some thought Trump wasn't the same as previous politicians, but I don't know if that's true.
well hes not, hes far from previous
I have a feeling that was just his platform, and he exploited that weakness perfectly.
his thought and ideals are the same sure,but his metholodigies are not
I wonder if Trumpism will die or if it's just gonna get more divisive from here
If Biden wins, that is
well you can bet his ass isnt gonna stop tweeting
The election shows that, and shows which ever President gets in, will not have a clear mandate from the people.
I think the next few presidential terms are going to be hard for whatever president gets in.
Also I doubt a loss this year will stop him in 2024.
but you know, once hes not president, if he doesnt clean up his act twitter can just remove him then, and he can go to his peoples personal echo chamber
I think the smart play for the winner, is to try to mend the rift between the parties and the people.
But that's probably going to be a hard road.
republicans have their own twitter they can use
Banning him on Twitter will cause civil war unless he gives a really good concession speech
well bidens so fucking center, and hes declared he wants to try, he can do it
no basket ffs.
Lol, that's a very leftist position of you Basket.
you want to allow fake news lol
If Biden wins, that is
@cosmic badge personally, if Biden wins, oh well. we had a good run while it lasted. ^_^ we'll see what Biden can do with this mess that keeps getting handed down the presidential generations
I personally have no faith in biden actually mending the rift
i'm not sure anyone can mend the rift at this point
people dont! see: trump supporters
He's too much of a politician, that especially after somebody like trump, he just looks like a fraud
You basically want the government to intervene on a private platform and tell them what they can and cannot delete on their own platform, sounds like government overreach to me π I thought you shared Republican values?
Well, Harris has indicated she wants to sign EO's that violate the constitution with a "do it anyway" attitude. She's likely to take the seat of president if she's VP in the next 4 years.
the way he looks into the camera and does that typical hand gesture they all do in some choreographed song of "vote for us"
if the right wants to spew their conspiracies, they can go to parlor
Oh well, that's fine. Such a platform would never catch on in the mainstream any way, so whatever lol
twitter is not for that
repubs will, parlor lol
Sure, remove section 230 protections from them then
we dont want that james
I mean, I think part of the annoyance is the inconsistency
e.g. news post trumps tax returns illegally, that's fine
and prob discord
No, just for social media platforms that remove content that isn't illegal
potential evidence being found which ties into stuff already ongoing, that's wrong
ok, then lets just create disinformation campaigns and flood the platform with so much fake news
Specifically for ones that editorialize like twitter
Twitter broke that trust with NY post, they admitted to as much
twitter isnt modifying the content ,its not editoring
see this is why i hate politics, tbh. everyone picks a side and latches on for dear life like it matters. Left this, right that, red this, blue that. Every election I try to hold conversations with people, but I always get labeled on one side or the other because of this stupid system. I liked Bush junior and would have voted for him if I ws registered at the time. I then liked Obama and would have voted for him, too. Then I liked Ron Paul and got off my ass and registered to vote. Then Trump comes along and i liked him so voted for him (twice now). I think it's fair to say I dont have a side, and I think people should not latch themselves on to either side either.
its adding disclaimers
i'm not really on either side either
I think I've generally been pretty consistent with my views, not specifically to a specific side
I don't think someone who wasn't would suggest revolution against a coup Republican government.
Though not sure who Billy was talking to specifically
and outright banning people from twitter if they post a new article which they can't agree on why they're blacklisting
They even admitted that they where wrong to blacklist it
I can't see how people don't see what Twitter did as reprehensible on both sides, maybe because it benefits their side?
i didn't follow the story because it wouldn't have changed my vote lol
so i've not no opinion on it
Yeah that's fine
I don't expect anyone to have that opinion
There's no evidence that Twitter deliberately colluded with any party in particular in my opinion
i dunno the tweets ive seen disclaimered were misleading tweets that needed to inform the user they should not trust the contents of the tweet
I honestly don't care what kinds of opinions Twitter tries to shape. I don't recognize Twitter as a valid source of information either way.
It's just a bunch of people flinging shit at a wall.
The issue these days is "where do you get your info?"
They completely blocked a potentially damaging Tweet about Biden, they've admitted it was in error, additionally they banned a majority of people who retweeted it, they expected the user who posted it to delete the original tweet (and it's traction, likes whatever) to be able to post again AFTER they allegedly unblocked the link to the article. They claimed they allowed the specific article to be tweeted again under oath, however at the time the article was blocked from being posted.
Sorry had to edit that twice for clarification as some of it wasn't very clear
Really don't care about Twitter's incompetence (or potentially maliciously calculated actions), let the free market sort it out.
i thought america had protections against actions like that. lol, specifically so that people can say damaging things against people in power, without censorship or consequence
hmmmmm
Sure, then lift 230 protections
1st Amendment doesn't protect you from Twitter
Then the free market can decide
If you lose 230 Twitter deletes your account
Yeah, that's fine by me
(and everyone else not a celebrity signing a contract that they'll pay the legal fees)
They can then be sued for that
How could they be sued for not wanting to risk being sued?
I don't even have an account, tbh
me either lol
Because they're an American company without 230 protections π
i'm just now learning of this 230.. why would twitter not be protected by it?
Without 230 they'd either need to lose all moderation and curation or explicitly approve every post before it goes live
seems like it was made for companies like twitter
It was made for ISP's originally
It was, Trump and Republicans in Congress have been talking about getting rid of it
But Twitter editorializes content, marking the validity of it
It's designed to protect companies hosting others content on the basis that they can't realistically prevent such content being on their site, iirc
To be fair some Democrats have too but it's been a big thing for Republicans
So, you can't post some funky shit and twitters CEO goes to jail for your actions
They wouldn't go to jail, it'd be civil
It's meant for forums, comment sections, web hosts, etc
Allows platforms to have moderation without being responsible for anything they haven't moderated
Pretty much anywhere you can potentially upload illegal content.
The main premise is that if they want to moderate beyond what is reasonable, i.e. political ideas, specifically deciding if something is or is not factual, they shouldn't have 230 protections
Additionally it takes into consideration how integral to modern communication social platforms have become, for better or for worse
Twitter is a very strange place.
https://i.imgur.com/Zt4eHnR.png
https://i.imgur.com/ANPBPmR.png
https://i.imgur.com/CTkSDob.png
https://i.imgur.com/kjl2S7N.png
I have to assume bots
dont worry @elder portal they said the same thing last election (even celebrities jumped on that one lol)
it's the same situation, but reversed roles here:
https://i.imgur.com/kyEtpKQ.png
https://i.imgur.com/SFnvRoN.png
https://i.imgur.com/unV9f9M.png
I think these tweets are simply trying to be deliberately divisive
i dont think any of those celebrities that said they were moving to canada if trump won, actually moved to canada
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
people just get too upset and never learned how to handle loss
That's a shame
I'm not 100% sure these are real humans
I hope anyone who claims to want to move because a president lost, actually moves
which worries me
I don't think Trump can actually get a recount anywhere he wants
They probably are
I'm sure many would, until they realize Canada has some of the strictest immigration rules lol
They're probably all Putin
someone, or some group (s?) are trying to deliberately divide the nation
It has to be within the rules for the state or he has to sue
at least it seems a possibility
I don't mind where they move Byteflux, just somewhere without democracy
Ship them off to North Korea
(on both sides)
basically, the same sort of thing is happening for/against both sides, and it's trying to take a side you agree with and make you hate the other side
^ ding
Yeah exactly
for example, replying to/talking to the side you disagree with
It's what politicians and MSM wants
So.. my partners cousin, actually disowned his own family for voting for a particular side.
it does nothing for the people already supporting your cause, it just makes the other side hate you more
Just like wtf.
She thinks he's a fucking loon, like I do
I'm annoyed the Senate didn't flip. I want my next stimulus check dammit. π
one day, perhaps
Nah, I blame Republicans.
Here's a thought
Stop compromising on the bill
Stop holding it up, Senate Republicans
I personally think both need to stop that.
Great
The issue iirc is that the dem side of the bill basically wants to cover a bunch of other stuff in their bill which the repubs don't wanna support
Nah it's both the Republican's and Democrat's fault. They've BOTH compromised, just not to the level the other wants.
Politicians fault, holding the people at ransom politically
Fucking disgusting by both Democrats and Republicans
Also, can I note for the record, Pelosi doesn't live in her district
Yeah she's a particular peace of work
Imho, you should have to live in the district you represent
Why don't you live there?!
Too busy getting her covid-rule-free haircut.
I would've assumed a lot of congresspeople don't live in their district π
But yeah, seems sensible they should.
Yea, if they're representing them
I mean I'm fine with them having a DC home as well for when Congress meets, and realistically the taxpayer should foot some of that
To a reasonable level, not talking 100M mansions here
Pretty much, imho
I love the interview she did on the late late show where she showed off her $20k(I think) fridge and her freezer drawer full of ice cream
at the top of the first covid wave
Primary residence should be in their district though
I don't see the Republicans going +30 in the House this election
Americans are losing their jobs since the virus rocked the economy.
Nancy Pelosi blocks funding for people to keep getting paychecks.
But sheβs got a $24K fridge full of ice cream, so sheβs cool.
Greta channels her inner Trump https://twitter.com/gretathunberg/status/1324439705522524162?s=21
So ridiculous. Donald must work on his Anger Management problem, then go to a good old fashioned movie with a friend! Chill Donald, Chill! https://t.co/4RNVBqRYBA
90961
474801
Yes, Americans are doing it tough just like Nancy, and her Sub Zero appliances.
They're +6 right now and I can only spot a few places they might gain more
Pretty sure I saw 3 in CA, 1 in TX, 2 or 3 in NY
dont think anyone was expecting Rs to get the house. think media said house was staying D on election night itself
They flipped 8, Democrats flipped 2 in called races so far
10 is probably about right
Dems had a 35 seat lead, Republicans gaining 10 will leave them with a 15 seat lead