#politics
1 messages · Page 19 of 1
The fundimental issue of politics imho is that you're not voting for the people, you're voting for yourself
if we don't win removal of the EC, at least it'll be better for the fight
Nor is there any real way for your average joe working 9-5 to really bring up the issues that concern him all too much
that's kinda the fundamental issue @autumn lotus
states vote for president
not people
¯_(ツ)_/¯
to each their own, I suppose
honestly, I just didn't expect the sentence "everyone, go vote!" to be so polarizing
political opinions startle me, sometimes
I have some pretty extreme views sometimes (abolishing the EC, changing the voting system, etc) but I like to think I'm not an idiot and want those at the cost of everything else
everyone's got different views on how things should be run, but I'd like to think that everyone wants what they think is best
and nothing comes from bigotry, malice, or hate
that's a pretty glass-half-empty view
I'm sorry for you
it's unfortunate that you hold that opinion, really
there's realism to thinking that some will serve their own agenda, but to attribute that to most makes that a very pessimistic viewpoint
woo boy, Trump's money issues are..
yeah..
no bueno.
that's like, the one thing people wanted him for originally
his "business sense", his money
I'm curious as to why you think Trump cares?
or what he cares about?
he definitely cares about his legacy- whether or not he leaves a permanent mark, good or bad
it's definitely not good so far
I'd argue that and say he gains recognition
he seems to always want more
everyone sort-of knew him before- at leats in a couple countries
now everyone knows him
and not usually in a good sense
I'm not convinced that he cares for much aside from leaving a legacy
which, if that's your only goal, leaving a legacy of pain and suffering works
usually, yeah
I don't see much good from anything, though
a half-built wall that's already falling apart, which was his entire campaign in 2016..
his "business sense" which has destroyed treaties and relationships we used to have
I'm not sure that's a good position to have
it seems that he's in the mindset of "if it's not helping us, it's fucking us" which isn't the case in a lot of situations
negotiations and treaties are far more nuanced than "give money, get reward"
yeah
great example of how he screwed us there
Two two biggest reasons I saw from trump was that he wasn't a politician, and there being a huge massive "fuck you" aspect
also that, yeah
In what way did trump jumping out of the climate accord cause harm?
They're following it it
It's just, they don't gotta really do shit for a long time
don''t forget he wants to pull out of the WHO for the same reason
We're seemingly on the hopes that in like 10 years or whatever, all their pollution will just disappear?
which is insane
The WHO knew about covid in like, November/December?
they also single-handedly entirely eradicated smallpox
and the WHO isn't a mouthpiece for China
yikes, alright, yeah, the propaganda pill is potent
Like, 40 years ago?
so, a little history on WHO
I mean, organisations change
If you wanna go on past merits, get rid of planned parenthood
The moment an organisation designed to protect X, starts hiding information from X, they no longer serve their purpose
anyway, history on WHO. It was created by the UN to try to respond to global health issues
this involved really every country
and still involves every country
And we're in the midst of our largest pandemic in god knows how long
the U.S. is the only country who can even back out of the WHO
also all of our donations to it are voluntary, only a small portion are required
And, they had the warning signs, which they squashed
same with China
there's a difference between keeping relations and pandering
something as nuanced as not pissing off entire nations seems to escape the president
wait, you think Brexit was a good thing?
The country is fucking moronic to actually go through with this especially after everything that's happened since
oh, thank fuck. lol
But, at the same point, where do you stop these orgs? If it was up to the EU, we'd all be in the eurozone
you HAVE to "keep relations" when you're an org that affects and goes into the entire world
We'd all be paying to save countries like greace which fucked themselves
the whole point of the WHO is that they're unthreatening
they're here to help
despite what you may think, you actually have to not be on people's shit list if you expect to be able to help them
that means building relations
and maintaining them
and walking a thin political line sometimes
they can't just agree with the U.S. on everything
they should be treated as such, yes
but politics is politics
and people will treat the WHO differently if they, for example, agree with China on something
because politics
I just pulled that analogy out of my ass
no idea where it could have come from
hindsight is 20/20, isn't it?
"now that I look back, yeah, they were completely wrong."
"damn them for not knowing everything at the exact time of impact!"
they were called out by some who did predict correctly
but at the time, it was all predictions
nobody knew anything
so someone saying it was X fault or Y happened had no idea of knowing until months later
some were correct, others were not
What is the point of throwing cash into an organisation designed to protect the world, if they're going o refuse to protect the world in the fear of upsetting some country?
nobody refused anything. They're a bit cash-strapped as-is and nobody knew anything at all at that time
they were doing the best with the information at hand, like all of us
they got it wrong, as did pretty much everybody
I remember reading that they saw the signs and how fast this can spread before hand
There was a lot of stuff going on on the basis of china and the who which fucked this up
and all of his experts
part of the massive issue is the % of asymptomatic cases
we move on and learn, we don't drop people at the first sign of trouble because we think we can do better
Like, we have uni dorms over here where huge swaths are infected
how TF are we going to do better than the WHO anyway?
do we think other countries are going to be super welcoming to the U.S. WHO?
The thing is that it's not just one incident
historically speaking, letting the U.S. in your country ends in sadness
so what's the solution, then?
we drop the WHO, they lose a ton of funding, and then what?
I honestly don't know
then why
But we need to figure out what happened
Because to my understanding, there was a fair chunk of supression in play
I just said earlier "I don't entirely know what'll happen if we remove the electoral college" and you challenged that on the basis that we should find out
and yet you want to go from the WHO? With no idea?
we should find out
but that we should pull out from it, right?
the U.S. is the largest donor to it, and they're already cash-strapped
they've worked miracles with what little they're given
I said why people tend to err towards giving cash towards an org with just yet another controvicy on its belt
we should, at the very least, find out what'll happen if we do
but I don't think we should, at all
and leaving Trump as president means we likely will
no bueno
I mean, I don't really see the alternative to trump
Basically, the only valid reason I really see for biden is the green new deal stuff, which is iffy, "HE'S NOT TRUMP"
enough damage has been done
Not to mention, it's sketchy as all fuck the way they're playing it
we need to focus on repairing what we've lost
Good news
If biden wins, they're gonna be reconcillation training being pushed for
Woooo
border walls and defunding the WHO are not the way to go
that leaves us vulnerable
also makes us look like damned cowards, afraid of our own neighbors
but not the neighbors to the north
can't have them dirty Mexicans in our country
You're conflating again.
that part's frustrating
what am I conflating?
I'm glossing over, but not conflating
I mean, you're acting like people who want a wall think that mexicans are dirty?
there's just so many problems from the Paris accord to the WHO to the border wall to "belief" in science..
it's hard to pick one
I mean, what benefits does the paris accord give?
also the fact that seats were specifically withheld from Democratic presidents until a Republican president could come by to elect them
"Obama saved me all these seats!"
no, he didn't, he was repeatedly blocked
ugh
so many problems
it's always been a problem
Trump just makes it sound like everything's falling in line for him when in reality it's all falling apart
he's very good at salesmanship
I used to be an excellent salesman, I see the techniques
You can’t argue that because the senate is not population representative
I also concede that Trump, so far, seems to have kept his word that his paychecks go to charities. I never looked at which charities, though
but hey, I'll take it
seems to be something good that he's done
thank fuck
I’m not sure I would trust anyone with the last name trump and charities
yeah
that bothers me, too
but I'm going to just assume it's all fine
because I need this
The issue is that the 4/2 arragement means that you can essentially have a "good" first half a term, and then be neutered to all shit
oh, plus the whole "reclaiming a term" thing
I mean, she was screaming about needing a pay rise
which "was just a joke, guys! Haha, right? Unless.. ?"
from heir like, 100+k job
huh?
I mean, last I heard, the entire nature of the collusion BS came from hillaries campaign directly?
that's cat
It is an issue
It basically means that you have 2 years where a president who's job is to take steps is unable to do anything
and the whole "Russians helped Trump" thing that was confirmed but never had anything done with it
plus impeachment..
the list goes on
there's just so much shit that piles up
did trump do it?
who cares if russians helped trump
uhhh what
did trump know what his party where doing?
so foreign political entities should be allowed to influence the election
illegal even in the constitution
See, that's where I'm conflicted
you love the constitution, you get to stick with it. No cherry-picking what you like out of it, here
mind you we are ignoring he fact that its documented that russian hackers have gained access to various voting systems in states
Other countries should not be interferring in others elections, outside of discussions, etc
But, really
"things people should know"
"right on election day"
I think it's toxic af that "No, the people voting for me don't deserve to know my stance on X", just goes to show how immoral and corrupt the system is
"before anyone has had the chance to figure out what and why"
"no need to think, just react"
"vote with your heart, not your head"
it doesnt matter
fuck russia for what they did
But, I've not really seen anything that proves that trump specifically colluded with russia?
basically my issue is with all of these things piling up on eachother. Any one thing would make a lot of people very angry at a single president. But all of these happening to the same president?
maybe, just maybe, we have a bad president
trump himself may not have.. but there have def been some suspicious moments between him and putin, along with various republicans
it's all way too much
if everything keeps falling down around you, maybe it's you that's the problem, not everyone else
but he does like his finger-pointing
and pretending everything's fine
if you haven't noticed, 2020 has been not fine
iunno if you caught those small details
hnng
and the solution is to throw anybody who agrees with trump in training camps a restition program?
probably not, but it might do some good lol
and so the alternative is that you vote for somebody who literally has MeToo moments on fucking film
ya
what's the alternative?
vote Trump again?
nope.
vote for a third-party? Yeah, lol, no
I'm not getting my vote split
blame the system for that one
as an American, your two real choices are Dem or Rep
You won't fix the system following the system
and I'm really not sure wtf the fix even is
yeah, that's why we're voting to oust the EC
But, I doubt biden is gonna fix shit
he can't do more damage
We're already slated for riots no matter who wins
that's all that matters right now
if he can fix shit, fantastic
but he won't do any more damage
Not to mention, it took them how fucking long to say that the violence on the streets from their side was not good?
and that's all we can hope for right now
I mean, if he starts pandering as all shit to the riots, yea, it can get worse, much easily
it's no use trying to say "they would have done this" because nobody knows
and it just leads to "mine is better than yours"
But, I doubt biden is gonna fix shit```
better than it getting worse under trump imo
you already have portland where you can't get the police to your house in a reasonable time if shit happens
It's gonna get worse
I don't want worse
No matter who you vote, it's gonna get worse
all we can do is vote for the person least likely to make things worse and hope
There is 0 investigation into anything these days
even if it's a matter of "how much worse" I'll take less worse
Well, I disagree that biden is gonna make it less worse
Trump will make it "more worse"
But will he make it more worse?
so Biden is the answer, here
for you
it can get worse than this
I hope for many people
everything
the country is more divisve than ever, for example
as evidenced by these conversations
some of it is natural
And what's the DNCs plan for the riots?
most of it is not
biden said he'd already accept the results of the election if he doesn't win
not a clue, I don't know what the future holds
during what, the first debate?
But, that's the thing
yeah, I believe him
One of the biggest issues right now next to corona
I also believe Trump when he says he won't take the results if he doesn't win
And we have no idea wtf or where tf he stands
which is terrifying
yes we do, he said he'd follow the science and listen to the CDC
I mean, you have shit like election boxes being set on fire
eh, said in hindsight, it's harder to take
only real diff I've heard from biden is a mask mandate
basically: I've seen Trump in action. I no longer want Trump in action. My only other viable alternative is Biden. I hope he does better.
I mean, from what I've seen, you're not voting for biden
that's my stance
You're voting for kamala
I'm aware
A person who literally fucked over, and laughed at, the people she's now campaigning to
Kamala is an interesting pick
Biden is very moderate (left-leaning, but very moderate still) and Kamala seems fairly proactive
it's actually a pretty good mix
nope
I mean, his running partner is somebody who literally called him for being a damned creep
he's got a good majority in the middle
honestly, if that did happen @mystic ermine I'm more impressed
if you're running for office, you've got dirt out in the public
I would doubt it
I don't see any evidence that would happen
I constantly fear aliens will come and abduct me, but the evidence says "no"
speculation is easy
refuting ideas based on fantasy is easy, really
I didn't actually see that. I should have
Am going to sleep now, please don't set your country on fire while am asleep
@near glen no promises
I wanna watch live 😂
You mean like the reports of biden sniffing peoples hair and groping them?
Not to mention, the literal videos of that happening
mm, pretty creepy
creepy if true, yeah
don't think that makes him worse than Trump though
I'd have to look, but I'll take your word that it's true
still not worse than Trump
if that's the worst thing Trump did to even women
Here's the thing that scares me
I'd be elated
It's all "this shit should get you kicked off the campaign", until its your party
"grab her by the pussy" will always be in my head
that's probably comparable to Biden
and that's not even the worst thing he's said about women
not even touching all the terrible things he's done as pres
even discounting all of that
there's still worse
it's ok, i'd vote for biden even if he shot someone on 5th avenue in new york
The issue with his statement is the level of it
Yea, there's shit guys say which like, we're guys
and I would say that then at the very least nullifies the creepy Biden thing
so, Biden's still better
But, his kinda went a "bit" too far
The issue is that pandering for "better" is hardly a solution
Biden should have neeeever been pushed for the pole
but again, trying to get "the best" leads to inaction
Republicans would have won 50 elections by the time Democrats found "the perfect candidate" that everyone loves
searching for better works
searching for the best leads you on a very long trip
and you may never come back
we don't need to do "the best thing" every single vote. We just need to do "the better thing" with every vote
We're not saying that you should run around and find the best
The thing is that you're pandering for morales, but as soon as there is a shot to power, those go out of the window
I'm actually not affiliated with either party- I go back and forth between voting for Democrat vs Republican
I try to pick the better candidate either way
remember his own presidental bid?
not sure
You know, the one he pulled out because he was caught plagourising time after time
huh
yea, because he's the clear person this time
he's got a ton of name recognition
gotta say, Trump hasn't really planarized much directly. He mostly just parrots Fox or his echo-chamber on Twitter
iunno if that counts as plagarism
he says enough in his own words that I don't think it counts
~part of me thinks that they knew their chances of winning was meh, so they just wanted to throw biden out to get him done with on the hopes that if he does win, they can replace him with somebody they actually want who voters threw out~
splitting votes hurts the party you're most closely affiliated with
Trump will have a fair few of his votes split to Kanye West
yay, voting systems!
this is why we need numbered selections
I mean, Republicans have been supplying democratic-like parties with tons of money for years. They finally get their comeuppance this election with Kanye
it goes both ways, though
lot of the techniques used on either side are double-edged swords
eventually the other party starts using the same tactics
if there is a system, people will find a way to game it
always
@autumn lotus redmapping
look at redmapping and tell me Republicans don't use political tactics. lol
both sides do
all the time
Republican party is not perfect
far from it
there's a few solutions to gerrymandering, but redmapping is completely different
we have gerrymandering-resistant voting systems
we just don't use them
bt also, redmapping is very different
that's how we got such a massively-disproportionate Republican leadership
through redmapping
I don't particularly care for one party or the other leading the entire country
and currently, Republicans lead the entire country
and have been for years
we need a swing before it all goes to hell
same with Democrats, if it ever happens that they lead the country we will need a Republican swing quickly
but currently the problem is we're way too far red
this kind of unrest has happened in the past as well, when one party or the other lead the country for a number of years
then a swing happened and all was fine for a while
it's not gerrymandering, no
gerrymandering is redrawing lines to ensure votes for party X outweigh votes for party Y in a single district
redmapping is what's been happening over the last decade, so recently: One large entity paid for sometimes hyper-local elections to ensure as many republicans in as many offices as possible all across the country
that, in turn, naturally effected other elections
that's why we have such a massive disproportionate Republican party controlling everything
which isn't good at all
neither party should be in full control of everything, else.. Well, 2020 happens.
here's a fun listen on redmapping from Planet Money a little while ago: https://www.npr.org/2020/09/23/916290633/redmap-update
2020 is more than COVID
and also not entirely China's fault
everyone fucked up
everyone
including our leadership
local or otherwise
there's plenty that could have ben done.
yeah, exactly that
masks as well
social distanceing..
none of that happened as quickly as it should have
China isn't entirely to blame
Many dozen countries which mandated mask wearing are on the cusp of wave 2
Not to mention, what do you do about the people who like, gotta feed their family?
right, and gathering a crowd of 30,000 people all without masks is a good thing
yep, definitely effective
So's having hundreds upon hundreds of people roaming around setting the place on fire...
Boris?
ya know, my memory is fuzzy
No, it was members of his party which he refused to condemn the actions of.
And trump is fine after covid
but, you know, trump gotta tell the white supremasist proud boys to stop showing up at stuff...
yeah, white supremasist, founded by a mixed race person
ur a point
welp, let's find out who wins in.. 2 months?
something like that
I'm still assuming we're all just trying to do what's best for the country
just different opinions on what "good" looks like
a lot of the racism and immigration stuff is driven by hate
and fuck "sides" at that point
I dont know whats worse, immigration reforms fueled by "hate" or exploitation by the ruling class for underpaid workers
glad we solved it
and there's not racist people anymore, especially people in power
definitely not
even if all of their followers are racist too
eh, all is a bit far
^
every law ever passed to limit voting has always disproportionately affected those groups of people
or apply for fafsa?
every single time in history
there's also the inability to vote after you've been in prison. Fun fact, many prison inmates are of color
unless we're all assuming people of color disproportionally commit crimes
which, uhh..
slightly racist.
it appears basket has abolished racism, sorry lads, go home
that also, you cant say they cant get ID's considering you need to get a license to drive...
any restrictions on voting are done so to prevent certain groups from voting. Historically, many of these were racist in origin
or really do anything
@autumn lotus you are talking out of your uninformed ass right now
ah, so they don't exist
preventing certain groups from voting is an absolutely invaluable tool in achieving power in a democracy. Make it easier for your supporters to vote and harder for your opponents to vote. If your opponents are mostly of color, you pass laws to try to prevent colored people from voting
also it has nothing to do with "certain things about a race" - it's everything to do with policies which disproportionately target and affect a particular race
usually these laws are harmless by themselves, but when combined become systemic racism
Which like, learn history, learn about red lining, jim crow, civil rights activism, etc etc, et-fucking-c
the perfect example is preventing people who have been in prison from voting for life. It kind-of makes sense on the surface, but if you look at prison populations they are heavily disproprotionally colored people
which makes it racist
systemic racism, actually
but they can't
in a lot of cases
that's intentional
voter ID is actually very similar
@elder portal so people cant drive? because that is a form of ID
individually, it sort-of makes sense, but when combined with existing laws it's systemically racist
also
voter fraud essentially does not exist
imma let my russian friends they are welcome to register to vote in the US
the risk/reward isn't worth it
wut?
so open up the system because it doesnt exist?
voter fraud is almost nonexistant
then what the fuck was 4 years of muh russia
not voter fraud?
and today with republicans stealing the ballot?
there is absolutely no valid data that says voter fraud is a serious issue, and a lot of data that says it is almost a non-issue
it's like climate change
sure, you can find a Brietbart article on it or something
but really, come on
If it does occur, it shouldnt be left to fester like a splinter
because it tells the people doing so they can continue doing it
voter fraud doesn't exist, I'm sorry
thats the electoral college
there's no data that supports that claim
You literally admitted that it existed
Your argument is that it's not enough of an issue to care
sigh it basically doesn't exist.
it's an issue because prominent people have made it an issue
And, there have been calls for protecting the system better, but the solutions generally upset a party or both
it's the same with voting machines, every goddamned four years we re-discover issues with voting machines
but it's not enough to matter
WE need to toss voting machines out the window
and we forget a month later
fuck electronic machines, they are nothing but a problem
voter fraud has always been a non-issue and there's no evidence to support it being a real problem
there's made-up evidence everywhere
or misconstrued evidence
but nothing concrete
sorry
it's a lie
er.. "alternative fact" - are we still using that?
is that still a thing?
or am I just behind?
ill wait till after today to see how everyones tunes change
Which I think is a security problem if it takes that long
let me blow your minds even more: recycling has also always been a lie. It's infeasible to recycle any plastic, and attempts to do so have been paid for by the plastics industry in order to calm the public down and get them to buy more plastic
you cannot recycle any plastics, ever
it's never been feasible
boom
mind blown
*oh no, that's a shocker, what a...Shit, I canny fake it, i forgot the word for like, so surprising I never coulda guessed
lol
What do you think about the threats of riots of trump wins?
I dont think ive ever been surprised by that, though putting bottles turned into pellets seems to be good for insulation
Over here in Norway, we're quite bothersome with the stuff you need to vote.
First off, you need valid ID. This means passport, (physical) driver's licence, debit card with photo & SSN, (as of this month) national ID card, etc.
Then you need the "ballot" the gov sends you. It says your municipality, county, time of residence, and more. This is just to confirm you're allowed to vote. Some stations (mostly police stations) allow you to verify fingerprint to circumvent this, but only 1 vote per person will be recorded nonetheless.
If you want to vote by mail, you need to register, then mail your vote ballot in an envelope, in a new envelope alongside copy of passport (ONLY passport) and your "I can vote ballot".
I don't see the huge issue with the whole ID stuff in the US. Just require it? It works great for the #1 country on the democracy index, so I don't see why it shouldn't work great for you.
from what Ive heard
Yeah
most european countries need voter ID to vote
if not all
basically the fear is that, when combined with existing laws, it can be systemically racist. It's something we need to look at very closely for fuckery before it's passed
How though? You don't even record which of your own citizens are alive, do you?
historically, most if not all laws restricting voting here in the states have been systemically racist
so we're understandably a little weary
it could be a good thing
buuuuut
they're still in effect
remember the whole "not being able to vote when out of prison" thing? Still exists.
The 82 in egg82 actually means he was born in year 82; he remembers all the laws :>
many do
Well, the US does record deaths
The issue afaik is heavily on how outdated the system is in some states
1928 years old :/
lol
Somebody was recently pulled up for registering dead people, for example
The issue is that small cases get overlooked as there is no real modernization
we have driver's licenses that sometimes double as IDs depending on your state
but not everyone has those
not every drives
well federal was meant to roll out REALID, which is just a stamp on your drivers license or state ID
most people from SF don't drive, for example
and every attempt at that basically goes out of the window, but, there are many dozen issues where, do you trust the people making the voting machines, etc
Over here in Norway, we allow (almost try to force, even) everyone who's a permanent resident and a resident of so so many years to vote. Doesn't matter if that residency is prison, doesn't matter how many sheets of paper printing your record takes, you're allowed to vote
Which I might add, works great!
the US is the only first-world country without a fed ID
it tends to complicate a lot of things
mm false
Which is why RealID is trying to become a thing
Norway also doesn't yet. We're rolling them out in a week or two
and I think thats a better system
First world doesn't include the US though :p
hehe
UK doesn't have federal ID either
iirc UK definitely has a feder ID
that's why we don't
don't yall have EU IDs until end of december though, cat?
because "fuck you English poshes"
if only we actually had real federal IDs right now
currently, I can think of one group requiring IDs would attempt to exclude: Democrats
most Democrats live in large cities, and the only form of ID you usually get is a driver's license, which costs money and time to take the test
and most of them don't bother getting one
thats their problem then
they don't need it. Uber exists, bikes, etc
States should fix that
but it could be an attempt to exclude them
also excluding the poor
it's something to consider before implementing it
your saying systemic racism is preventing them getting an ID, but your saying lack of time also
imho, ID should be government provided
MOST companies are fine with people taking a few hours out of their day to do things
But, EU IDs are literally not a thing I've ever heard of
and I do think depending on the state, some exceptions are to be granted
either way, that would definitely be something to consider before implementing mandatory state ID for voting. It could exclude certain groups.
Only real photo ID people have over here is their drivers license or a passport, of which I have neither because poor ass family
but yeah, ID's arent expensive, its $30 for an ID that expires in 5 years?
The government triiiied a scheme a few years ago which fell on its face as the cards where so easy to forge, that when they /finally/ fixed that, the system was cast so far into the shadows that nobody really cares about it
gotta look at which groups it would exclude and who it would benefit/detriment as well as who is promoting it and why
$30 is a week of food for some
even longer
That's part of the issue with fixing a cost of stuff and screaming that it's cheap
I dont know where the hell you live, but you got more issues being in a democrat run city than being in the countryside where its cheap
its expensive and lots of people complain about random bullshit like this
really awesome people
See, I'm conflicted, there are pros, but, being so cramped to people
laws that tend to protect you
The cost of living in those areas are also stupid
as someone who grew up on a farm, in a small town, and moved to the big city, I prefer the city
cost of living is dumb, but that's pretty much the only real downside
also traffic
but yeah, trade-offs are worth
I'd love like a "in the middle" aspect
Ofc, if you live in the middle of fuck anywhere, you're SOL for companies who have to pay fucking thousands to provide services even close to you to offer services
I'm not purely in the middle of nowhere, but this cabin's got fantastic internet/electric
and I dont deal with people
I'd love sorta like a "off the city, but, still within viable distance that ISPs would be stupid not to run services there"
interestingly enough, two things are true:
- Younger people tend to lean more democratic, older tend to lean more republican
- People in larger areas tend to be more democratic, and more rural republican
a few things lead from those two
I saw a fun thing
apparently gen Z was the first generation in fuck knows how long where the children had more conservative values than left
you're right, I mis-typed: older is more conservative, and younger more liberal
though, I find it odd with systemic racism is why the local population doesnt just vote out the people that havent fixed anything until now?
although they're close enough to the parties
The issue is party politics
"just vote out all the bad people"
thanks, good advice. Never thought of that.
how could I have been so blind?
Like, you're basically told that the democrats are the party for you and you'd have to be a moron to vote otherwise, essentially
or you pick your party
I mean cities vote in the same people/party every cycle and not much changes
and a lot of complaints of systemic racism are in the city
people might be told that. I like to think a lot of people think for themselves
I mean, part of the issue is you pick your party and it doesn't happen to line up, you can lose all your friends and be pushed as a shame to the community
there's been a lot of discussion on it from movements like walk away
problem with those kinds of movements is they tend to create echo chanbers
I wonder if dem cities are the ones which tend to shove for unions and other BS
also they're heavily used to try to get opposing parties to give up hope and not vote
I know repubs are generally more against unions last I recall
There was a record number of registered Democrats changing their registration to Republican this year allegedly
Yea, but does it not raise red flags when people start saying about how they where cast out of their communities because they had a difference of opinion?
I hate unions that act like businesses
maybe to a fault
Unions typically are more important in US because some basic protections other countries have they don't have
cough police union
Well, that's the point
im anti police union
I've heard some reports that unions are almost as cancerous as HOA's in some cases
it's good to have that power struggle, though. Without unions we'd still have child and slave labor.
but im anti any union, or their current implementation
at least child labor
slave labor might be gone
the point of government is to attempt to control business
I mean, you shouldn't need unions and it's a total ass shame that we do
that's the whole idea
But, there needs to be protections to ensure that unions can't turn into the police unions
no, the point of government is to make sure everyone is playing by the rules set and to govern a group of people
protect and serve
the purpose of a business is to gain more money. Everything else is secondary. If that's your only goal, running mines with slave labor is immensely profitable
Yeah unions are typically very HOA like, they have power / money hungry people running them usually.
that's when gov't steps in and says "no"
HOAs should be illegal
Well, it's why there needs to be a better labour market, so people aren't stuck working for people which do that shit
HOAs are interesting, because they're small-scale politics and business rolled into one
makes for a fun game
Easier said than done in some areas
I think they should make certain actions HOA's and Unions do illegal.
if I had an HOA, I would immediately try to find out how to lead it
power to the powerful, and all
I may be moving to an area with one
we shall see
I mean, it's catch22 with HOAs
Some areas can be good and have HOAs which actually are just there to look out for the community and support it
HOAs tend to control how your property looks and benefits
Some are just there to shit on people coz look at my power
where's that "rules for rulers" video? It's fantastic at explaining why corporations, politicians, and HOAs act the way they do
HOA's are good until they infringe on your personal freedoms
Adapted from 'The Dictator's Handbook': http://amzn.to/2fgBWps
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ig_qpNfXHIU
Grey discusses this video on Cortex: https://youtu.be/ILvD7zVN2jo
Che Greyvara T-Shirt: http://cgpgrey.com/chegrey
Special Thanks:
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita &...
it's a good watch
well worth it
But yeah, I just find it odd with people complaining about systemic racism and voting infringements happen to be in cities runned by the party that says the same thing
need some evidence for that claim
it would have been solved at the state level since elections are controlled by the state
To be honest, I believe in the idea that US politics is ruled by a one party system. The two parties are just an illusion to hide that party, which is the establishment.
I mean, I dont know what evidence I need to provide with super majority democratic state cali and democratic majority new york?
the positive claim requires the burden of proof, after all
There are a lot of areas where both parties literally vote the same way when they're in power.
I think that's a bit tinfoil-hat for me
if dems are the ones screaching about equality when it comes to voting and whatnot, you would expect this problem to be resolved in their local state?
The issue with many aspects is "we don't wanna see it"
homelessness is a good example of "we don't wanna see it"
but again, I'mma need that proof
People want more green power, but, they don't want see the wind farms
they do have the power to kick racists out of low level positions if they so want to
and homelessness is basically the #1 thing I was thinking of
e.g. that guy who made the tiny houses
Yea, it's not a solution for the issue
anyone can say anything. For example, Republicans are single-handedly ruining our country and it's entirely their fault.
Do I believe it? Nah. But hey, debate on that while I think of another positive claim.
Its a double standard I see with these people
But, you know, until the state who is throwing metric fucktons of money into the issue, it's like...
Oh, you're talking to me?
You have stuff like areas of these states which are basically impoverished, but, people can't really build anything there or add opertunities to the area because they'll throw all the existing people there out
But, what else do you do to boost theses areas up, without providing opertunities to help boost those areas?
ohai @brisk cradle
Like, I understand the concern that some aspects will bring people from all over in, and that's something that defo needs to be fixed
I'm 99% sure I've been the only non-Republican in this chat all day
@elder portal What I am saying, is that if systemic racism has been an issue for years, and democrats have been saying they are planning on solving racism at its core, wouldnt you think that the states they control fix those issues when obama was around?
Yeah, Tux, if you hadn't realized by now, Trump speaks off the cuff.
Or, well, there needs to be some form of way to try to encourage these companies to try to dip into local pools vs encouraging mass exodous
please do not tell me the bleeding obvious, thanks
I mean, am not really sure where I stand on parties
I'm drowning in arguments
Then again, I'm a brit, so, who am I to talk
one person cannot research everything all at once 😦
if ur so smart egg
I can just think of both speeches right now:
Fellow Americans, thank for for your yuge support of me. Together we'll make America a cruel place again.
And what if he loses?
It's all fake! Biden didn't win! There were 100,000 fake ballots cast in Pennsylvania!
He's not your typical politician who has all the non-answers prepared
Trump's already stated he won't take losing well
Biden's stated that he would
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Well he's insinuated it
an attempt was made
Lets face it
It remains to be seen
I mean, I believe Trump, unfortunately
If in some convoluted world, you ran for pres and lost to somebody like biden, I think I'd cast yourself to the shadows
If you think Biden will take losing well at this point you're probably not listening to the music in the room though
Hillary is still bitter about it to this day
hillary already pitched in and said biden shouldn't concede no matter what happens
Yeah, there are groups who don't want either of them in, and will riot regardless.
Correct.
Obama said similar I think
sure, but I'll say I believe Biden when he says he's not going to dispute a fair loss
fair
I'm not sure Obama said anything about rioting either
Fair is subjective, he's already said Trump is trying to rig it.
not really Obama's thing
I mean, of course Republicans are trying to rig it. So are Democrats. Everyone's been trying to rig it for centuries.
The problem is by saying fair is that Biden's campaign is prepared to look into everything to make sure no foul play was involved, which would just drag the elections through further
how are we this behind?
I think part of the issue is that trump refuses to speak politician
everyone's playing this game
i mean you could argue several things repubs have done have been attempts to rig it
sorry to break it to you, but the rules are broken
saying "the opponent is trying to rig it!" is part of the game
We're not in disillusion about this.
it happens every election, in both parties
gotta get past the shit that always happens first
why is this election unique?
a few reasons, I can think of
its not, i dont think bush should have wont 2000. im like 99% sure that is was stolen
It's not now, this election is the same as last election.
welp, that was 20 years ago. This is now.
Two bad picks.
I mean, it's different in many ways
voter turnout is massive
the internet age caught up with politics a bit
Yeah that was 20 years ago, the counties in Florida didn't comply with the election law of Florida.
the fundamental difference is, repubs accuse dems of rigging by allowing more people to vote, and dems accusing repubs of rigging by restricting who votes
lots of Google/Twitter/Fakebook/Apple saying "go vote!"
didn't really happen last year
er.. Last election
Florida General 2000 is very different to the current situation
maybe it's just me, but it seems more prominent. Google's always done its thing, but now all the other are too
only thing I've seen from them is, "go vote!"
basket why can russia influence the election but not big tech
also, that thing again. Was recent, though, so hey
Russia seems to be wanting to help Biden this year
russia is documented to have broken into voting systems
putting out PSAs on Trump
egg82, you know how there was the big investigation into Trump?
yep
preventing misinformation is different vs silencing voices
the campaign
That was entirely based off Russian disinformation.
no?
my opinion is nobody should be interfering with American elections
The source for the allegations in the Steele dossier were Russian assets.
so you are willing to give free education to all then? college too?
"yo guys we only have 20 cases a week with trump!!" isn't "for the voter to find out"...
how do you expect voters to figure it out if theyre not educated
FBI knew this, and blocked it, but then rogue agents sourced it via back channels.
lol, expecting the average person to try to figure things out themselves. It's a good sentiment, I'll give you that.
that only works if everyone is educated
@shut vine I'm aware, I've been following
I'm glad.
which is something repubs have been working against for decades
but yeah, seems Russia is looking to help Biden's campaign this year
objectively wrong information should in every sense of the word be marked as objectively wrong
censoring info needs to be fair game
Also be careful about Russia tbh, they're likely to "help" a candidate to make them look bad.
and tbqh, it's been kinda funny, as they've been making it more fair, and now the people who where screaming for this are screaming that AI does stuff like blocking them for spouting stuff
They're PROBABLY just trying to destabilize democracy, so wide net approach.
Soviet US of Russia
A quick search later and that twitter acc suspension was 100% fair game
anyway, it really all sounds like a lot of "as long as they're helping Trump I'm okay with it" rather than anything consistently logical
they violated twitter's TOS, so they got it suspended. nothing wrong with that whatsoever
who?
Who violated it?
trump's campaign acc
NYPOST was not publishing anything against their TOS.
which was false mind you
Neither was Kayleigh McEnany
where?
It hasn't really, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was false.
I've heard of it being disproven, but I've heard of a security researcher proving the contents of the email where legit
The FBI will not give accurate information on the status of that until probably tomorrow.
id like it if everyone was taught enough critical thinking skills that misinformation wasnt an issue
look slike FBI investigation, yes
but republicans have worked against eduacation for decades so that wont be happening
They learned their lesson from 2016 I think.
my lord, who can you trust?
nobody
Generally yea.
I don't know if anyone knows what the emails actually were but Russia was shopping around emails and documents they hacked from Burisma in 2019, never found a buyer afaik
do you hear yourselves?
hand-waving everything away with arguments that barely hold together
The news literally finds every little thing to hammer him on.
ever heard of occam's razor?
He keeps doing a bad job of it
because he literally wouldnt do it on stage?
I still think the burisma thing should be looked into, even if it turns out to be false
maybe, just fuckin' maybe, Trump isn't the victim in every. Single. Goddamned. Claim. Against him.
He doesn't just do it full stop, he always has to equivocate
No I don't think he is.
as I say, trumps issue is that he's not a politician there
he literally told them to stand by on stage at a presidential debate
President Donald Trump on Monday (August 5) called for urgent action to prevent gun violence and said all Americans must "condemn racism, bigotry and white supremacy" after mass shootings in Texas and Ohio killed 29 people and wounded dozens.
Trump, whose rhetoric has frequen...
there is SO MUCH handwaving that goes on around EVERY SINGLE ONE of Trump's stories with so much "believe me, this happened" when nothing happened, and eveyone just assumes everyone else is lieing
It would be easy to say "i disavvow white supremacy", the issue is that especially recently, everytime he's asked, he has to try to spin it to be I'm good, they're bad, and that's easy for the anybody to shove their way
fucking hell
is the entire world lying to you?
guys, come on
really
sigh
alright, I'm out
no more
I love you all to death, but lord have mercy
I mean, they're blatently saying that he refuses to disavow right wing militias
But, he has
I don't think he's always the victim, but there's a huge bias against him in the media.
Also the only public version of the emails supposedly from this laptop are some PDFs of printouts of them, no headers or anything
So how could anyone say if they're legit?
Yeah, the media wont accept he has, and continues to ask him to, he has buggered it up a time or two though
Unless something else has been released that I haven't seen
I'm personally in that middle area of it being sketchy as fuck on both sides
I agree
I honestly think hunter needs some explaining to do as to why he was in ukraine and china
Pictures can be faked with enough money
I think part of the thing is that "russian disinformation" is literally just a fallback shield these days more than somebody actually standing up to say anything substantial
Be skeptical, there is currently one independent witness, and Russia claiming the whole thing is false.
If I were putin, id be playing both sides, which makes me think IF russia is at play, they would do their best to fuck both sides over
In fact Russia has the same opinion mostly as the 50 ex-intelligence analysts/officials.
Not sure, he's not running for President though
it makes sense for one side to accuse the other while being played by the same third party
As far as the links to Joe we need to be wary, otherwise it's not a matter for the election
I think so too, but, I think reserving judgement is a good idea
I think an investigation similar to the Special Counsel investigation of 2017 should occur.
I mean, aside from being established as a lawyer and lobbyist
But he was almost certainly hired because of his last name so he could make them look more credible
Would you support a Special Counsel investigation Amaranth?
He doesn't even have to do anything, just being there makes them look better
I think it's already been investigated a couple times in the US and Ukraine, not sure if there is a point
Provided the "laptop" hasn't already been proven fake.
If the FBI thinks there is anything to the laptop they should look in to it
I think those investigations were made into as to why trump looked into it, not just because hunter was in ukraine
But from what I saw the smoking gun email from the laptop was a bad photoshop
It could very well be, just like the Obama/Biden administration were doing in 2016
Oh the impeachment itself was about Trump withholding congressionally appropriated funds to Ukraine, I misunderstood.
He wanted them to commit to announcing an investigation of biden
Those funds were the same funds (1 billion US) Biden threatened to withhold if Ukraine didn't fire the allegedly soft on corruption prosecutor who had an investigation into the company Hunter worked for.
Allegedly that investigation had been dormant for 6-12 months.
Yeah, Trump allegedly demanded they investigated Hunter in Ukraine.
An executive branch entity blocked funding to that cause as well.
Biden got the prosecutor fired because the US and EU were going to stop helping them if not due to them being corrupt and making no effort to clean up their act
Yeah, doesn't change how it looks though
iirc it was the EU leading the charge, Biden was just the messenger and the US was the primary funder so had the big stick
That's literally what I said in my breakdown of it
Well not literally, missed the part about other countries
It has been looked in to
The FBI has looked at it, Ukraine has looked at it a few different times as different government come in to power
Congress has looked at it
Just like the Trump allegations were looked into by the FBI and discredited prior to the special counsel investigation?
The special council investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election had nothing to do with the Steele dossier
Probably because they're the NYTimes and not a tabloid
And others can get their own off the record sources to confirm enough things
Well the laptop is not from an anonymous source is it?
The Steele dossier was discredited before that investigation was created but the FBI was still looking in to Russian interference and any possible connections with the Trump campaign, the special council just picked up their work (and most of the people working on it)
No one else has seen the laptop
A blind guy and Rudy Giuliani had it, I don't even think the NYPost had it
They just got some pictures and screenshots
I don't think Rudy has seen the actual laptop, just a copy of the data.
"Here are the files from the laptop, analyze and verify" would have gone a long way. Instead it's "Here's some PDFS of the laptop's files, without useful data to verify, trust me I'm America's Mayor"
The FBI has it, if my memory is accurate.
Did the FBI confirm that or just random computer guy claim it?
Which is probably why even at the NYPost none of the "reporters" wanted their name attached to the story so they put a random woman's name on it who had nothing to do with it
The FBI has operated by the standard rules set by the DOJ, they have no confirmed, denied, or made any formal statement about it
And no newspapers or networks wanted anything to do with it
It's an election year, and the information is related to a candidate, so if they are investigating it, I think it's good they're not talking about it.
So... facts don't matter to you, just feelings. Helpful.
Eh, they have a lot of stories like that they don't talk about because they're non-credible
The media doesn't need something so vague on Trump to go on about. He admits to enough things, openly does enough things. They don't need such a ridiculous hole-filled story from a guy known to our intelligence services to be a target of Russian disinfo
You only hear about them when they make a mention about them for some other reason
Or if someone posted it online they might cover the noise twitter is making about it and maybe vox would write a piece about it
Yeah, that's how it should be, they're not a newspaper.
We don't know what's going on is my point.
We didn't even get the headers for the emails
If there is an investigation we shouldn't find out about it until charges are laid.
Those would be trivial to provide and would at least prove it was actually an email that got sent by a real gmail account
Even then considering the possible subject in this case, maybe not even then.
wikileaks dumps had headers, didn't they?
Comey making a statement like he did back in 2015 was against DOJ regulations.
Wait, WikiLeaks had dumps of the Biden stuff? Or we talking about Clinton?
The media sat on the dossier for months and only started talking about it after one of them decided they liked money more than credibility
The evidence that the dossier was fake was not released for a long period.
They couldn't verify anything in it so didn't publish anything. Once one of them did now they could talk about the controversy
That came out as part of the Special Counsel investigation I think.
Comey's announcement noticeably changed the race
You could watch the movement in the polls before/after the announcement
Robert Mueller had to remove Lisa Page and Peter Strzok once that was discovered along side their personal emails.
Amaranth, which way do you feel the polls went?
I'm curious as to why he announced it.
What time does the election results start?
Expect the first results to roll in around 7PM EST
He thought Congress would leak details about it that make it look worse
They immediately tried to
Appears Democrats may be winning currently on early voting counts.
Within a day of the Comey letter, Google searches for “Clinton FBI” had increased 50-fold and searches for “Clinton email” almost tenfold.
Well you have to admit, that looked super suspicious.
Also the fact Obama had emails from her private server, and claimed he didn't know about it.
@shut vine Keep in mind that data is based on voter registration status. There may be registered Republicans who voted for Biden, likewise registered Democrats may have voted for Trump.