#politics
1 messages · Page 11 of 1
you think thats their only income?
its incredibly easy to have a family member be a "consultant" for your campaign
and to justify spending campaign money for various other expenses
massachusetts
nevermind the fuckers get $600/mo for expenses also
I wouldnt be shocked at the kickbacks for retirement in these states
yeah, full retirement plan
sounds like we're forgetting who has all the cookies
?
while this isn't about immigration, the idea stays the same: https://i.redd.it/sb3t71kcik741.png
politics 101, if we cant see them, its not an issue, not until our security barrier is broken down
though that still opens up a whole other can of worms
some nice benefits being in some of the top politics and law positions of gov't
but they aren't multi-billionaires, either
clap you stupid bastards
yeah, one guy makes a product and gets rich off of it, while some guy has power to take your money
BUT
not all billionaries are liquid billionaires either
they dont have said amount of cash, its their net worth
that money is often in stuff like businesses
its not money if its not liquid...
yeah, I know, a lot of it does go to other businesses. Stocks, etc
which need money to ensure that they can keep throwing jobs out to people and do the R&D needed to release stuff to keep stuff going forward
you cant liquidate stocks without it crashing...
well, a few people can for a short amount of time
depending on how much they have
yeah, it's more complicated than "this person has a a ton of cash"
I dont know how much bezos has in stocks, but if he was forced by the government to sell them all off, it would crash amazon
and the stock market would go down
but I mean, if they didn't have money then they wouldn't be the richest people in the world
¯_(ツ)_/¯
the government would only see a fraction of what the stocks were originally worth
and not what they were worth
never said gov't should force anyone to sell anything
but it can be liquidated if needed
just saying that's a lot of money and power for one person
yeah, if the owner of those assets needs
"if needed" is basically saying that you agree with people being pushed to that
never said anything about any external parties forcing anyone to liquidate anything
"if needed" didn't imply that
the problem is how to tax the person, you cant really tax them on net worth, that would break their bank if its high enough
and their income is lower than what people expect
if the owner of those assets wants to, they can take everything that have. Would be stupid to do so on many levels, but the point was that it's a lot of money and power for a single person to have
there's issues with taxation in that if there's a system people will find a way to game it
yes
last I checked, the art market is still booming
There needs to be mechanisms to prevent people from using tax loopholes, I agree with that one
But, you have to be careful about taxing businesses to death
not necessarily taxing businesses, no
that could end poorly
to be fair, taxing individuals can also end poorly for the same reasons
there's many banks all over the world that store USD
¯_(ツ)_/¯
and that's just one loophole
of many
actually that's the biggest reason these loopholes still exist. Closing them just means businesses or individuals move money to another friendlier country, and then we get nothing
something is better than nothing, but it's all shit
or yeah, moving a business to another country as well
and passing along the cost to the consumer
though then you get into "free market" territory, but that's also usually squashed with the current monopolies
it's all shit
still dreaming for the day where we can get rid of currency
As for the ppl in here saying the public wants the president to it in a new Supreme Court judge now... https://apple.news/Ang7Pm_PtTJKAZogDsdRUkw
hey, a poll of americans before she died said that they were find with the current president picking one
idk what that says
Can you link that poll?
man, I love how the NYT's paywall is all over trumps tax records
also, how the fuck did the NYT collect such records?
because I doubt I can call the IRS and demand tax information on public figures myself
but again, I really wouldnt trust the documents unless the IRS backs it
but really, if these people were to want to show the world trump's tax records, they should have not put it behind a paywall
so yeah, if anyone wants to send me a link that isnt behind a paywall, Ill look at it
otherwise, what trump is saying is the only view for people who don't pay the nyt till someone dumps it
can sometimes view it in incognito
excited to watch what almost assuredly will be a very entertaining 90 mins tonight
yeah, this is going to be a shitshow
and biden wanted breaks
fuck that
he wont get breaks while being president unless he said fuck it, this is someone else's job
if he does get elected
if biden brings out the "make sure your record players are on" talk, itll be interesting. And if he does that, how is trump gonna respond? he gonna be like "Hey joe, should we reschedule this?" or is he gonna say something crazy like, "Hey Chris Wallace, why don't you ask biden if he is on drugs" 😆
I think trump is going to try a knockout blow to biden on the first
but he could pull a Castro and look like he is punching an old guy, so he can't go too far if something happens
but this is why itll be fun to watch
poor biden, having to try to make sense of wtf trump is talking about for 90 minutes straight
I just hope that all this crazy nonsense stops, but something tells me that when it comes to a republican victory, riots will break out everywhere, whereas democract victory will enact revenge for daring not to elect them in 2016
wdym revenge?
packing the courts? restricting 2nd amendment rights?
really disapointed theres gonna be 90 people in the audience
itd be better if there wasn't anyone to cheer when someone says a stupid zinger line
I want to see a debate where joe rogan handles the moderation
restricting 2nd amendment rights
how is more gun control revenge?
3 guys at the table, 4 hours
speaking of that, did you see that spotify employees are trying to get editorial control over his podcast?
fuck gun control
its needed tho, lol
tell that to the state I left
no other 1st world country has so many gun violence problems
police has guns, criminals have knifes, seems fair to me
police has guns, criminals have fully automated riffles? not so much
the problem I see is that many websites combine deaths from murders, mass shootings, and suicide
inflating the death rate
im trying to find a site that actually seperates all the data
that isnt wikipedia...
im trying to find a site that actually seperates all the data
as long as its combined for all countries its not an issue, is it?
for all countries?
I want raw data
not combined and ranked based on population
and stripped of anything really useful
hm
alabama is reported to have a high gun crime rate, but there is no constitutional carry
ah, no permit required
hm, I wish there were better stats
lot of crime in the city
yes
instead of trump saying "cause you'd be in jail" like he did to hillary, I'd love to see, "cause you should be in a home" tonight
😆 not good for the country, very good for entertainment
not good for the country
Then why would you want it? ._.
this reddit post is too good
Denmark: We can slash CO2 emissions by 70% and still afford a generous welfare state
America: We can slash welfare by 70% and still have a shitton of CO2 emissions
#PresidentialDebate #TrumpBidenDebate #Vote2020 #ABCNews
LIVE UPDATES: https://abcn.ws/3jeVv24
Schedule of events:
8pm ET Pre-debate coverage
9:00pm ET Presidential debate
10:30pm ET Post-debate coverage
SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://bit.ly/2vZb6yP
Watch More on http://abcn...
yeeee lets get it on
yep i am watching. going to try not to discuss till after and ive heard both sides.
already talking over each other
well did you think that wasn't gonna happen?
i see trumps point. i also see bidens.
yeah, the SCOTUS thing, I just think it boils down to whoever is in power. We have elections, if people don't like what the republicans do, they can vote them out.
oh christ this is ridiculous so far
I thought trump shut down that roe v wade bit well tho. We don't know what she thinks on that
and he got biden to agree there
yeah, lol
don't think thats smart
lol
I guess im debating you not him, but im not surprised
what is that?
both these guys are idiots holy shit
trump needs to stfu and the host needs to stop jamming preconceptions in his questions.
ok, its not just trump. it's both of them. they need to let the other person talk and think about their fucking responses.
christ
this is crazy
you the liar, no your the liar, no your the liar
ok, moderator needs to asert himself rn
moderator doesnt have the power to mute the mics
chris is losing control here
holy fuck man, they're just steamrolling each other
I keep forgetting what the original question was lmao
this topic was supposed to be the supreme court
wait did trump even answer the hosts question?
not really
no
I thought Wallace was going to be good. he is pretty fair during interviews with both sides
I honestly think trump is doing this to cause chaos and to spite biden
Is there a time limit in this debate?
the debate is 90 mins long
15 minute sections, 2 min initial response each side, rest free talk. 4 of these.
oh well that's shit
6 of those*
well this is going to be shit with these stupid time limits.
tbh even trump fans have had that thought
yeah
Trump is just going to talk over Biden and just shout "radical left"
This debate is already gone to shit.
i just called my mother, who is a trump supporter, and she is just as confused as i am right now
it took like 5 minutes for it to fall apart
But it is comforting to know Biden is speaking cogently.
until the moderator has actual power, this will remain the result
agreed.
Trumps goal might be to just make biden very mad
mics need to be muted.
i think you might be on to something.
I find it hard to believe that these guys have any goal in this debate other than just "winning" it.
and biden is falling for it
Xi is the president of China
oh right
but that might go over american's heads because lolmurica
Xi is pronounced she
ish
Trump just went back to claiming COVID-19 was caused by China
more like zhe
regardless, that's a very close approx pronunciation. not the point
yeah, the president is lying about COVID
of course he is.
Claiming that closing travel from and to China saved lifes? Unfortunately COVID already hitched a ride here.
yeah, that's gonna be a theme
you don't think restricting travel from China didn't reduce the spread of covid here Tux?
no lol
if there was more travel, it just wouldve been in more places
wasnt even a full restriction
there's evidence that COVID came here as early as December 2019
its not like there was a biocontainment restriction or something
any reduction in travel, even if its one person, statistically means there would be less chance of spread of the virus here right? what am I missing
the china restrictions are and have always been economical
I'm going to have to agree with machine maker
trump's trade war against china, not his poor handling of covid
fuck I know a guy who left, went and got tested there, then flew back
this debate r bad
@faint radish problem is statistical significance
this debate is horrible
if just one person was stopped due to travel restrictions, that's not statistically significant
uh oh
wtf is this
personal attacks again
more personal attacks
omg wff
do uh, the personal attacks appeal to anyone but the angriest, furthest right voter who is already voting for him anyway
though I did find that attack a little funny, I expect that line to be used
who is watching this who hasnt made up their mind anyways?
like I can't imagine a person who hasn't decided this (if they are voting in the first place)
"plastic pelosi" are you FUCKING KIDDING ME?
Biden: "we need to have a plan"
Trump: "Nancy Pelosi"
how rude can you be
Trump shut down the economy kek
debate summed up with the joe biden shaking his head dot gif
my mind right now is that both these guys are idiots
trump moving his hands back and forth dot mov
why is Trump claiming Biden wants to shut down the economy?
plays to his base
^
"states that shut down are not doing well" - hello Florida, COVID-19 hotspot with a Republican governor
oh no, is he going to say he was for masks the whole time or something now
the biggest mask hes ever seen, what does that even mean
like, what is that supposed to mean
lol
Trump is a cult leader
this moderator is not unbiased
A leader of a death cult
no problems at his rallies 👀
no problems at his rallies
like we would believe
Trump rallies: scant mask wearing, zero social distancing
"China plague"
Herman Cain died from COVID-19, which he probably contracted from a Trump rally in Tulsa in June.
is trump just focused on not losing his base
yes
or just incapable of not being... him
yes
he realizes he's not winning right
"Biden will destroy this country" - lol
yeah im almost a full six pack in
November 9th after the election, does Trump think Election Day is November 8th, 2016?
and we got 2 more of these debates...
vp debate
5 weeks 3 debates
Democrat states with a tight shutdown? Just look at California, it's a mess.
if biden wants to continue with this
no one cares about the vp debate
We're setting records in COVID-19 cases and deaths
some years the vp debate is actually more interesting
idk if thatll be the case this year though
SARAH PALIN
yeah, attack dogs
idk I dont remember the last vp debate being very interesting so who knows
everytime pence talks I basically fall asleep though
very monotone speaker
BUT WASN'T TIM KAINE SUPPOSED TO GET THE HISPANICS BEHIND HIM BECAUSE HE SPEAKS SPANISH?!?
I think I only watch the debates cause trump makes them more interesting to watch, regardless if you agree with him or not or not
I remember.
clearly must've been interesting, totally forgot the other vp candidate's name
I think anyone who can easily remember the losing canditates veep from 4 years ago probably pays too much attention 🙂
including myself
@brisk cradle I wouldnt be shocked if china is hiding its true numbers, because its got a really low death rate compared to population size
Well, also China has over a billion people 
can agree about small businesses being forced closed, mine almost died and we didn't qualify for sba loans. my parents had to pull out of their retirement funds. at this rate unless im able to help them a lot they will never retire
There's a lot of controversy over China's numbers on both sides
literally, due to covid and trump's response
but yeah
but they still support T dog
I do think China is probably hiding
they both kind of want to spin it to their own side
because I call it bullshit that total china cases is 80k
look at what he did, ignore this thing he also said
the tax returns thing is still really fucking hilarious
everyone else wouldve just given the fucking returns now
Trump's tax returns will remain a political meme into 2090
trump should be like, Ill release my returns, if biden takes a drug test
"OK"
But by then half of the US will be uninhabitable
Ive been playing a bit of fallout lately, I'm ready
that is probably one of trump's best arguments, he just frames it really poorly
that is true, biden did vote on tax policy for trump through his career
I took advantage of the tax code...
business man would take advantage of the loopholes and play the game
lol
biden wants to make it a moral argument
but at the same time, he was there
so if he could just frame that better
yeah, he made that clear in 2016, he said he tries to pay as little taxes as possible
like any businessman
yeah, hes not denying it
there you go, the GOP can say "BiDeN wIlL rAiSe TaXeS oN tHe MiDdLe ClAsS"
the gop always says the left will raise taxes
the fiscal republicans always disappear during a republican presidency though
lets see if the national debt gets mentioned even once
theyll be back if biden wins
chances are high, no
the national debt is an unlimited worthless number to 99% of the american public
Republicans support Modern Monetary Theory too, but only when it's politically convenient and suits their policy goal of tax cuts and obscene military spending
I think next time, whoever does the next debate is going to have mic cutoffs
nope
trump would never agree
the rules are all agreed to beforehand
there havent been mic cutoffs in decades
thats an important point. both parties have to agree to the setup
this isnt a recent change
yeah, pretty sure the last chairman of the joint chiefs said the national debt is the biggest national security threat to our country. It cant go up forever and if something cant go on forever, it must end.
Trump brags about 3% growth in one year and calls it a boom
if one doesnt, it doesnt happen
its just never been so fucking annoying
god, I was watching at 1.25x, now it dropped back to normal speed and they just sound slow
3% is considered strong for the US Tux
Cut military spending
listen here tux, education is the most important thing because our children
We can find the money for Medicare for All too
maybe not a boom, but its not insignificant
but we arent going to pay the teachers
we've got shit to blow up
"no you're a number 2"
jfc
i cant even comprehend the stupid back and forth insults right now, can we have some fucking substance please
"we brought back manufacturing" - sure, replacing the human labor in Chinese factories with automation in US factories
yep
BURISMA! Oh boy
if they bring up qanon I have bingo
he should. we need an adult in the room
Yea, both of them are trying to run off
you dont think hed get publicity for yelling at the canditates
especially if they are behaving like 6 year olds
not the kind he wants when he goes back to fox
Reminds me of our playgroundgovernment
he isn't a right winger, hes pretty liberal.
not that I expect any of these moderators to ever step up
he's not even remotely liberal
just cause he works at fox, doens't mean hes right wing
he's just not hard right gop
he's liberal in comparison
you underestimate how far right things have come
in europe even biden would be center right
Chris Wallace isn't very liberal, he's pretty liberal for Fox News, but put them up against MSNBC and he's hard-right.
well pretty sure that MSNBC is far left
MSNBC is so hilariously far left though
my god
yeah, took long enough
he probably wasnt planning on yelling, but I imagine itd be hard to stop yourself. you'd go crazy just listening to these guys
Im pretty sure everyone in here is
bidens laugh just...
im losing my mind, im 6 beers in and i have 6 more. might need all of em, we'll see
Charlottesville was on my bingo sheet.
https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1311120537440063488?s=20 this is probably accurate
Last night, my 6-year-old and my 4-year-old had a discussion. It was significantly more edifying and informative than this debate. Not close.
157
1454
simple i am already out
I dont know if that super predators quote is true, but that's where he needs to hit him
thats the right response
biden, you were there writing and voting for the very legislation that contributed
if he maintains one cohesive thought that might be a good come back
Ben Shapiro is pretty vapid intellectually so this adds nothing new
trump has been doing a good job about hitting buzzwords, which i guess is all he needs to do
ddg! define vapid
true
I dont think anyone is going to be swayed by this one
so yeah I guess trump is going to stroke his base and biden just needs to hold it together and not tell him what he thinks
Nobody is getting swayed by this one, I agree
agreed. people have made up their minds a while ago
Though Biden did a great political coup by staying almost silent over the summer and watching their polling lead go up
trump is either going to respond very well or very badly to this.
no neutral response, im predicting
"we're going to work this out" is a pretty weak answer
then again its a political debate, they're all weak answers
thats like the classic politician answer, "we're gonna study this"
I tend to get more right news thrown at me than left for what I'd potentially imagine is obvious reasons
But, I've never really seen bidens stance/plan on anything
biden's stance is basically obama 2.0 on everything
But now Biden must talk. I think Biden is up for it from the look of things.
I liked that answer from trump
But will that be enough? He can still snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
trump likes to him for being radical because it energizes his base, but I dont know any "radical" democrats who are happy with his plans
The Squad doesn’t like Biden very much. Their support of him boils down to “he’s not a incompetent fascist, only a semi-competent neoliberal”
The super predator lingo was around back then and associated with that crime bill, don't know if he was one of the people saying it or not
trump isnt a facist...
I mean, it seems like the major reason for the DNC for any canidate is "it's not trump"
violent crime numbers are all garbage
He said predators, looks like hillary used the "super predator" phrase
it's been trending downward for decades now across administrations, policies, etc
it's just a matter of picking your numbers, limiting them to which metrics, and framing them however you want
SInce we stopped using leaded petrol 😄
k, now biden is doing a bit of interrupting
I think a lot of people want to see a return to “normal”, which Biden would give you.
Biden has been doing a bit of interrupting the whole time
The Twitter news cycle is exhausting
im waiting for twitter to explode
moderator no power bad debate
oh good question here
tbh I would expect most normal people, not on the twitter politisphere, to basically take nothing from this
Most people already made up their mind, yes
We have less "undecideds" at this point than any time in recent history
ok, Biden is answering this very well.
he was clearly prepped on this question
wait, did biden say new york was red?
I'm not even sure if they have records of a time with less
yeah
the right is being very explicit in framing it as defund the police and anarchy
the best thing he can do is reframe it
is calling a "nine-one-one" call a "nine-eleven" call a common thing? here in Cali it's not but I've just never heard that wording
ive heard both, but nine - one - one is more common where i am
9-1-1 has been the most common everywhere Ive lived (in the US)
I’m just going to say it, this debate would have been worth it if it were Trump vs Sanders, so I can watch Trump dissolve under Bernie’s game
it would have.. rip
fan debate, trump v sanders
no points, just popcorn
tbh Im more interested in the memes of chris wallace trying to get them to stop talking over eachother
lmao
"if you wanna switch seats"
ye there were no problems when they sent in the feds 👀
Trump will probably use red baiting, bash him with his wife’s mismanagement of a Vermont college, but otherwise have no real response to Medicare for All other than “it’s communism”
white supremacy question is a great one
Neoliberalism breeds fascism and socialism though.
eeeesssh
you know, this debate is a pretty good metaphor for the state of the country though
good lord autocorrect
Np
there the Impeachment Hoax bingo spot
not going to do anything for him
people are pretty decided on that
you either do or you dont
I think I got a blackout already on my card 😛
still waiting on qanon
someone wanna delete that off topic gif message
ye he left them
smart to push judges. its one of the things conservatives were able to think and hold their noses and vote for trump the first time
he totally didnt have nominations sitting in the senate
I think that super predator phrase is something from Hillary Clinton, actually
turtle man strikes again
lol yeah... i dont think the senate confirmed any during their latter reign
they did not leave them, they where forced to leave them
hes quoting a bit from democrats
somebody have space force?
pelosi, clintons mainly
more hunter biden talk
It seems like everyone forgot about space force about two seconds after that was actually real
space force supposedly put a satellite in space the other day
(it was an airfroce sat)
hey, im glad its real. china and russia have equivalents
Space force is basically just the folks that run the GPS system
space force was originally part of the air force
space force seems more like a reorg than the new amazing thing they claimed it would be
trump can only attack biden's son. i just. god, if i was the one who lost my son and the opponent just attacked my son i would lose my mind.
They split all the satellite groups off the Air Force and Army
uh
I mean, I bet you $10 I could find some quotes from big orange
oh no
oh sorry, disregard, he's talking about hunter not beau
Trump's kids were a part of his campaign and administration
oh boy
when?
yeah, I don't think trump would talk bad about the son he lost
trumps kids are literally front and center in the campaign
Trump's kids were a part of his campaign and administration
Illegally too
are we talking about how great trump is and how he's gonna roll this election =
yes
two of them gave speeches to ABC and the other newscorps before this debate
i can join in
🙂
how are they not part of it
I was mistaken in thinking I could find a civilized discussion here...
Jared Kushner, the incompetent Shadow Prime Minister of the United States
oh boy back to this
and they arent allowed to do that?
well leaf just showed up, civilized just left
Well Biden involved himself as VP with his son's situation in Ukraine.
I think their children are involved on both sides due to the nepotism.
btw the stuff Trump is spewing came from a Senate report where the only sources are people the FBI and intelligence community warned Congress were Russian assets looking to sell someone disinformation...
if you are in politics, and you aren't finding a way to get your family more money because of it, you are missing out
not saying its right, but it sure is everywhere on both sides
the dodge there not to anger his base
"what do you believe about the SCIENCE of climate change"
trump: talks about beliefs.
trump is doing a great job of having the question said to him 3 times
I don't think Biden actually did anything in Ukraine to help his son, he was trying to get a prosecutor that would actually go after Burisma instead of one that accepted bribes
oh no is he going to talk about european forests again
But I think he shouldn't have been the person doing it considering his son
are we going to get another european country on the news to refute that, again
are there forests in europe
why doesnt he just say that
wtf
thats a perfectly valid answer
"I dont believe because it drives energy prices up"
I think I'm a couple minutes behind, dang it C-SPAN
plenty of americans would be thrilled with that answer, whether its "good" or not
well, climate change is mentioned in this round of debates is an improvement vs the 2016 ones
come on qanon, we've got what ten minutes left
rolls dice across the table
daddy needs a bingo
Chris Wallace is pretty fair tbh, so it's to be expected
Did he just "old man shakes fist at cloud" on ECUs in cars?
apparently
and apparently biden is gonna major infrastructure
which is never gonna happen
major infra isnt sexy
Sounds like FDR
wont get through congress
idk that "without the US, the paris accord is falling apart" is a fair statement
c-span is actually more up to front here, just switched over to it as it has better quality too than the rehost on trumps channel
I mean, economically spending lots on infrastructure right now would be good
I'm on the C-SPAN stream
I dont even disagree, I'd be all for major infra spending
watching on the fox stream, only 720p smh
I know the stream is behind my local cable
biden is doing some interrupting here
tbh I don't understand what infra they're proposing that wouldn't obviously fall under the responsibility of the states.
or maybe I just think it's a state issue in general
I agree, when I've visited it was kinda shocking tbh
most state projects are federally funded
so the feds are always there
but generally intrastate infra is the responsibility of the states yes
that fed money comes with terms though, and thats how they get them
Congrats.
not just nukes, nukes in hurricanes specifically
damn I shouldve got a different bingo card
fucking drop a nuke in a hurricane
If we're talking about hurricanes I want to see a mention of a sharpie
lol
The full quote is reportedly,
"I got it. I got it. Why don't we nuke them?" according to one source who was there. "They start forming off the coast of Africa, as they're moving across the Atlantic, we drop a bomb inside the eye of the hurricane and it disrupts it. Why can't we do that?"
That sharpie is an american hero, amaranth
That was something we actually did a study on back in the day
but its not as good as if he said it at the podium
trump didnt say it or said it to spot a leak in his administration
oh I totally forgot about the sharpie thing lol
Back when nuclear power and nuclear weapons were going to solve everything
wow, Biden said he doesn't support the green new deal
was that news?
wont matter cause far left is gonna vote for him anyways
idk, I hadn't heard him say that before
far left isnt thrilled with him, they just know trump is worse for what they want
Biden just did a gaff there
he did
i thought the fact that biden doesn't support "AOC's" green new deal was old news
he's had a few gaffs but nothing huge
far left knows that this doesnt matter. theyre all upset but they will vote for him cause its not trump
maybe I missed it simple, I just hadn't heard that before
I was worried when it started, he stumbled out of the gate on his opening statements
i mean specifically AOC's plan
trump did pretty much what anyone wouldve expected afaik
well I think the debate got better as time went on, but still , not great
wow, Biden said he doesn't support the green new deal
This isn't news, lol
we're just back to, I dont think there's much shifting of the electorate lol
https://iwillvote.com/ is run by the DNC, btw
big surprise
"green new deal" is specifically AOC's plan, however the wording he used there was bad. could probably hurt him very badly.
ew
re: voting i got my ballot today. i refuse to vote by mail, i'll be going in person.
yeah that gaff could've hurt him with moderaates
Supporting it would hurt him pretty badly too
but I think he recovered enough to clarify
But yea wording wasn't great
we'll see
Wording was just wrong, he said the wrong thing
oh no
why would you end with crooked hillary
does he know he's not running against hillary
but the emails...
He is trying to run the 2016 election again
buttery males
He has been
me @ this entire "debate"
this 90 mins did go by really quickly
it did
I mean, people associate politicians and their ideas mostly due to red or blue.
he's totally going to fight the results if he loses
what happened in NJ, i am curious
oh god he's ending on the efficacy of the ballot counting
Other than the one in the trash I think Trump is talking about ballot request forms?
of course.
more then one ballot does not mean that it going to be counted more the once
yeah... im really trying not to think about it Z
Most states aren't sending out ballots out of nowhere, they're sending ballot request forms
Probably the group of Trump ballots that were found on the side of the road?
hasnt the military been voting by mail for like... 80 years now
My county has always sent ballot request forms but most of the country you have to mail them to start with
they have yes Z
I think the bigger issue is sending ballots out to everyone instead of people having to request them
Who is doing that?
they're sending out request forms, not ballots themselves
The states that always do and California, who was going to be switching to that system anyway
That's via an absentee system I think. Where they specifically write in and request it.
that'd be no bueno
the military I think handles the mail till it reaches the US, and the military has a strong non partisanship thing going on
Yeah that's the issue Trump has with it MM.
California is sending ballots. I have my ballot right now in my drawer. I don't plan to use it. I'll be going in person.
I can send a picture as proof.
(If necessary)
Guess I missed out on New Jersey one
at least NJ is sending ballots out to everyone
It's recommended even if you mail it in that you vote in person anyway.
that is scary
To validate your vote.
sending out forms to request ballots to everyone is fine
California is in the process of moving to only mail in ballots
tbh though, if mailing everyone ballots did actually get more people to vote that is probably a net positive
Just like Washington, Oregon, Utah, and Colorado
more voting doesn't always mean a net positive
🙄
Uh
more informed voting is a net positive
i didnt request that.
who decides who's informed and who isnt
Yes, California is doing ballots
that's the fundamental problem with that argument
Because they're moving to only mail in ballots
I mean, as long as the vote gets counted, and they're informed yes.
plenty of uninformed people make decisions on thousands of things every day
you're surrounded by them
This election you can do both iirc but in the future it'll be mail only
you decide yourself if you are informed
im just providing my proof
and if you are, you request a ballot
and if you aren't or dont care, you dont request a ballot
4 other states already work like that
why doesnt that argument apply to just not sending it in?
if you can't take that small step to request a ballot, what does that say?
the IRS still hasnt processed my tax returns, I doubt mail in voting is going to happen well on scale
Must gatekeep, or the democrats win.
Australia requires everyone to vote
that is a horrible idea
I agree.
also, would violate first amendment here
But yeah, turnout pretty much only helps Democrats, that's why Republicans are the ones doing all the voter suppression 😛
poll watchers... man where does that sound familiar from
what is this about watching? why should people be allowed to "watch" how people vote?
are we overtime and just arguing now
I thought this was 90 mins yeah
honest question, please educate.
They didn't start on time
they shouldnt, its an intimidatation tactic
you do not get to watch individuals vote or who they vote for
its meant to scare people from voting
People who are trained as poll watchers and register to do so can go do it
But you can't just dump another Brooks Brothers riot on a polling place
over many years because politics
ok sure, you should be able to watch that ballots are not thrown away and are all submitted to the voting machine (which nobody in the precint has access to open)
i can agree to that specific point
Yeah, there are people doing that from both parties at a lot, I want to say most, polling places in a normal year
There are also independent groups that do it
"its been an interesting hour and a half"
uh huh
yeah, I need something next time. I was just sitting here on my computer
at least there was no zinger lines purely designed to get a crowd reaction. I was glad to see that go
the vp debate could be interesting if kamala goes full prosecutor mode
but that could also be seen as way too aggressive if she overdoes it
the scattered applause seems awkward
VP debate is always nothing but mud slinging
That would bite her in the ass
Trump kind of broke things by doing it all himself 😛
I would say it depends on the context
lol these guys in the crowd
but yes it could definitely blow right up
Normally the top of the ticket is above the fray and focus on explaining and defending their points
ABC says "both men lost"
I think she was a very poor pick for VP mostly due to current news and her history
The VP candidates mud wrestle
Yeah, basically
ye we were talking about that earlier amar
Not sure mother will be okay with that amaranth
If one of them could have maintained composure and just debated in their time they would easily have won.
It's ok, he won't be alone in the room with her
Biden tried, James, lol
Not super effectively, but at least he put some effort in.
and if you did just sit there and take it, in the right context, would that make you look weak?
Eh.. they both tried, but they both utterly failed.
or would it be seen as respectful and calculated
Biden couldn't just let Trump walk all over him, once he started Biden had to do it too
its very risky
That's actually the perfect time to not do it.
Clinton couldn't get away with it because when a woman does that everyone just calls her an emotional bitch but guys are allowed to be tough
At what point did Trump try maintaining composure? He couldn't even finish a complete thought in his time, and I don't think we had a single uninterrupted 2 minutes when Biden talked.
Clinton bounced between giving as good as she got and trying to be the better person and got attacked harshly for both
I look forward to the memes and twitterverse explosion
It shows a clear definitive distinction between them, then Biden can say something like "He has no respect for the process of things, he will just keep interrupting me no matter what you say". Then either he stops and looks weak, or he keeps going and looks wrong for doing so.
look at mbax already on the meme train
"level of exhaustion"
yeah this debate did nothing to help that on any side
who won the debate boys
they both pretty much lost
china
or russia, america's enemies won
I don't think anyone changed their mind due to the debates
Which movie was it, "Whoever wins, we lose" 😛
So it's a tie
Well, if that theory is right anyway
tbh it probably just confirmed for a lot of people that the debates were all gonna be a waste of time
Why are all these memes for ants?
Oh hey MSNBC finally updated their only live stream tech to not use Flash
Only like a year after Flash was completely killed and a couple years after browsers that aren't IE blocked using it
I was just picking through the youtube streams
dont need any random crappy custom web players
They're using the NBC tech finally
well it's been fun, let's all do it again. Next week on "wow look at this shit show"
stay safe peoples 🌮
fucking circus, which makes me wonder if it was a bigger play for trump
Why are "Proud Boys" trending on twitter again? 😦
they where mentioned in the debate
Trump definitely needed to do well in this debate
Not lose, not come out even, he needed to knock it out the park
He is so far behind if he keeps the status quo he is screwed
Well, the problem the left is having is again underestimating him, now they are treating him like a threat
but they think he is simple
but I honestly think its a show
What I saw was an attempt for trump to get under biden's skin
and it worked
to some degree
I guess I missed that proud boys bit in all the shouting over each other they were doing during that segment
pretty much moderator asked trump to condemn white supremacy
and he avoided it every way possible
And told the proud boys to stand by?
no but they took it as that
What does that even mean?
uhhh widespread right wing violence inbound
In tonight’s presidential debate the President said the “Portland Sheriff” supports him. As the Multnomah County Sheriff I have never supported Donald Trump and will never support him.
48156
107100
but I honestly think its a show
For his entire life, around people in public and in private?
I mean that county is a major portion of Portland but not all of it.
He likely means Washington County, but poor wording on his part.
"Proud Boys, stand back and stand by! But I'll tell you what...somebody's got to do something about Antifa and the left."
Yeah, I don't understand what he was trying to say there
The proud boys part?
Sure
Also Biden was the first one to say the name, seemed Trump was looking for a specific group to talk about
he was asking who they wanted him to say he condemned, which from what I can see, few of the things brought up in the example before that he has already done so
He has been very weak on any condemnation he does, he always does it as a part of some word salad, tries to do a both sides thing, or both
Those groups don't think he has really condemned them
I mean calling white supremacists evil and thugs seems pretty strong as far as condemnation.
I mean, it kinda woulda been nice for trump to utter the whole "Yes, I condem X, Y, Z", but, at the same point, that just woulda sounded like just regurgitation to make people happy; I think he gaffed with "stand by" and doesn't mean it in a "get ready for war" sense, but, god knows
He has done that quite a few times, so yeah that's probably partly why.
I think both of them got emotional which is probably another factor.
I think all I can really say is that November 4th, 2020 will be chaos
Never mind November 3rd
fully expecting to hear of violence at polls during voting
After telling the white supremacists to stand by, yeah they'll probably go a violent route on the 3rd.
It's going to be bad. I am 1000% sure there will be violence at the polls and voter supression like we've never seen. There will be more violence and smoke-closeted rooms after the election because we won't know who won since a lot of people will be voting by mail.
The election’s going to have problems, and each side is going to try to blame it on the other.
The worst-case scenario, of course, is a "red mirage" in which Trump will be leading on election night but as mail-in ballots are counted through November, states will tip towards Biden, and Trump will call it electoral fraud.
i hate to say it.. but i legit think that this will come down to what the military interprets as the results of the election
why?
lol no that isn't gonna happen
who will remove trump if he refuses to leave? the SS?
but i legit think that this will come down to what the military interprets as the results of the election
I don't think we're at the point where the military decides who gets to occupy the White House. If they did have that option, they would probably back a winner decided by the democratic process, such as it is.
if trump doesn't win. come jan 20 at noon, hes just a guy in the whitehouse trespassing
this whole "what if he doesn't leave" is stupid
What do you guys think of the idea of direct elections where each person has one vote and whoever gets more wins? It seems like the idea has been going around and it kind of makes sense.
makes total sense as long as its not FPTP
well it makes more sense than the current method still but, FPTP is bad
I think popular vote needs to be foremost. I don't like the idea of the electing those who then elect.
If Trump refuses to leave the White House and Biden wins (or let's say the election is not decided), then after January 20th at noon, he's a trespasser at the White House. If Biden wins, he's the lawfully-elected president, if the interregum passes without a resolution to the election, then Nancy Pelosi will become acting president if Democrats keep control of the House (which is likely).
yep good point tux. i kinda get ahead of myself sometimes so, sorry about that
But if votes aren’t counted for president then they aren’t counted for the house either. It’s on the same ballot.
The prospect of Acting President Nancy Pelosi should scare some Republicans.
I think popular vote needs to be foremost. I don't like the idea of the electing those who then elect.
Statistically it causes loss of precision in the name of personal idealism. Nobody, regardless of what they say, is perfectly unbiased.
We would have, if only for a short time, the first female president, a feat that was denied to Hillary Clinton.
Yeah. Horrible debate.
yeah, we had fun commentating on that one live
No substance.
Some
like 10 mins in, we were all like this is a shitshow
Not much
I summarized the debate to a conservative colleague like so:
This debate will not sway people towards any one candidate, if anything cynicism is the real winner.
Heh
So little substance that from an engineer viewpoint (
) there is essentially no substance.
It was just 3 old dudes yelling at each other for an hour and a half. I’m surprised none of them had a heart attack or passed out.
Still watching
The only hope Trump has is to (1) win a convincing legitimate victory or (2) engineer a "victory"
The window for (1) has already closed, so the GOP is doing (2)
Well those are always the only ways to win.
No, if he wins, it will be through (2)
i think u underestimate just how dumb the democrats are and have been
(1) is already precluded as a choice, given Biden's strong polling position, which the debate yesterday won't sway.
Actually, the data suggests people are overcorrecting from '16.
I mean, if I'm a Democrat, I would run as if we were 20 points behind my opponent in every state, and it'd hopefully be the same if I were a Republican.
yes
that was clintons failure in 2016
skipped the red states
or well
the middle of the country
But if you run aggressively everywhere then you spend all of your money, and money is everything.
Clinton's failure was not a lack of targetting red states, that would've been a waste of money.
She failed by overconfidently predicting that the Rust Belt would vote for her no matter what, and she ignored the very real warning signs that that was unlikely to happen.
But I will admit, stuff like pouring money into Utah based on shaky polls in a red state is 
yeah, the midwest was her bet to be in her favor
but again, those were hit hard in the last few decades
and arent the power houses that they used to be
Yes, Clinton won the popular vote. The problem is that she won those votes in reliably blue states like California and New York.
Popular vote is meaningless, farmer votes count more.
You listened to planet money as well, eh @restive seal ?
Which should be fixed but good luck getting states whose votes count for more to agree to it.
And no, egg. This info is everywhere :)
I dont agree on popular vote, its a horrible idea in the first place. Just because it sounds good doesnt mean it is
But the country is made up of people. Just because they’re grouped into states doesn’t mean the states always represent them.
The electoral college is far less fair
Which should be fixed
Republicans don't want to fix it as the Electoral College favors Republican votes over Democratic votes. Remember, 2 out of 2 Republican presidents this century won their first election in the Electoral College only.
Yep yep tux.
so poor peasants vs rich liberals?
I don't have a response to that which meets community standards. Have a good night y'all.
sounds like someone got owned
Popular vote still isn't "fair" because of the voting system we have, but the electoral college was designed from the beginning to not be fair- our founding fathers believed that the common person should not be able to vote
@dusky raft I invite you to read some socialist reading materials. The idea that the GOP is a savior of the working class is based on a fiction, and Democrats are little better with the establishment wing still clinging to 1990s neoliberalism with bits of social democracy thrown in to try and not repulse younger voters as much.
and socialism is the answer?
socialism is actually cancer
as we've previously discussed just how stupid stealing property is to redistribute it
reading an ideology to view things from that point of view doesnt mean you agree with every single tenant of it
lets be poor together then
its good practice to understand the world from all possible lenses, and even those you disagree with make valid points more often than not
In fact, a lot of right-wing agitators attack the Democratic Party using left-wing thought, although in a very disingenious way. (Dinesh D'Souza is pretty well known for doing this.)
taking property from one person to another is stealing
As they say in debate, those who shout the loudest and longest win
Howard Zinn is appealing on the right as much as it is appealing on the left.
This goes for today's debate and also "mbax getting owned"
Don't think anyone wins there
For me, I dont support an ideology that empowers the government to take what they want in the name of the greater good
And boy Biden sure does debate really well for someone who is supposed to be terrible at this
Methinks someone set the bar low
For me? I don't trust private business to do the morally right thing. I also have a deep distrust of the state.
Great for Biden
he honestly handled the debate better than i would have in his spot
I dont trust two things when it comes to private businesses:
- cuddle up in bed with government
- become too big, refer to ^ as to why
So yes, I'm not afraid to say I am a socialist. But I am more importantly a libertarian.
I trust business to do business things. If it's cheaper or better for them in some way, they'll do it. We fix that through restrictions and guidance
and doing socialism is ^ but making companies government owned
I am first a libertarian, then a socialist.
half the time im in this channel it's to shitpost
the other half it's to tell dumbass socialists that it's actually cancer
Capitalism is actually cancer 
crony capitalism
Private business handling government contracts is interesting, but it seems safe
