#politics
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
not disputing this lol
I read "warm-ongering" and I was so confused
A lot of cultures eat bats or other similar animals but only the chinese and south asian culture gets hate for it^^
and to be fair, eating a rabbit or a turkey or like a wild deer isn't that much better tbh? whats the difference, other than the animal and that western culture sees it as "normal"? That's equally disturbing for other cultures

I think my /s was lost
But it's there
Generalizing millions of people in a few stereotypes
This is how i stereotype fat american karens https://youtu.be/hxGEJqLEk2c
Miley Cyrus has sparked controversy for featuring plus-size model Angelina Duplisea in the music video for her single 'Mother's Daughter'. Critics have suggested that Angelina's appearance in the video is glorifying obesity. Angelina debates with Piers and former glamour model...
Lol
These fun
I love watching dumb people without proper reasons
I think they are ruining my image of a lot of shit tho
I don't think you should be making fun of people who are overweight but it shouldn't be something celebrated like Piers said
64.6 BMI holy shit.
That's... that's quite a lot.
I mean if it’s an actual disease causing it, ok.
If it’s because they are brainless karens who are afraid of not having their xxxxl mac meal for dinner then fuck off
Also stop making me watch videos that make me think "Piers Morgan isn't entirely wrong here"
xDå
I mean, if they want to be fat, good for them.
Don’t influence others trying to sell fat as good tho
Well, if we look from a health perspective, then neither side is good. Being overwight isn't good for your body, but being underweight isn't either. With that reasoning you shouldn't influence others into becoming overweight, but not the other way around either.
If you look from it with a culture perspective, then it's just other dumb norms people socially expect you to follow. Imo if you want to be overweight/underweight then you do you, just be aware of the potential health issues.
I feel like a lot of this channel is just discussing certain keywords that don't even matter
who really cares about these "karens"
the world has bigger issues to deal with lol
politics is half semantics
like why is there even a politics channel in here lol
so people can mute it
who really cares about these "karens"
Idk id say it’s an umbrella term describing a pretty damaging group in America
Can’t really say they don’t have an impact either
Cause karens is all i see from my secluded heaven here
Lol wtf
Also speaking of wtf, wtf is that meme(?) format
Looks like a biden campaign ad
Hot take, pointing a boom mic at asylum seekers in a boat in the middle of the sea makes you look like an utter fool
Sky News is following a fourth boat attempting to carry migrants across the English Channel into the UK this morning.
Read more on this story here: https://t.co/6JOWbLK4ZM https://t.co/YFh82ELYIl
323
830
Instead they should be pointing their mic at the politicians who cause this situation by blocking proper migration
I mean, covering news about asylum seekers isn't bad in itself, but that woman indeed acts like a complete idiot. Also ^
"In a dark season of pestilence, COVID has reduced to tatters the illusion of American exceptionalism. At the height of the crisis, with more than 2,000 dying each day, Americans found themselves members of a failed state, ruled by a dysfunctional and incompetent government largely responsible for death rates that added a tragic coda to America’s claim to supremacy in the world."
"For more than two centuries, reported the Irish Times, “the United States has stirred a very wide range of feelings in the rest of the world: love and hatred, fear and hope, envy and contempt, awe and anger. But there is one emotion that has never been directed towards the U.S. until now: pity.”"
Man, this article says exactly what I feal
seems kinda like they're just being sensational to get clicks
our covid19 response was less than ideal sure
the fact that you'd feel pity tho is eh
i mean personally mostly i'm just afraid for the US
it's one of the downfalls of a split power system that we have
hard for the federal government to override the state governments
and impossible to enforce policies that are for the greater good due to civil liberties
I life in a Federalism too
i mean it seems like a lot of what's happening in the US is due to soft pressure from the federal government
It's also an issue here, every state is doing whatever
But we have leadership to hold the states together and find common ground
they can't tell states what to do but they can withhold highway/education/etc funding
yeah the federal gov sending mixed signals is bad
trump wants the country to look like normal
so he pushes for schools to reopen
like a dumbass
i think he's pushing for lockdown again
but lord knows he already changed his mind
The more I read if that article the more I like it
Got a meeting now, gonna finish it later
"If and when the Chinese are ascendant, with their concentration camps for the Uighurs, the ruthless reach of their military, their 200 million surveillance cameras watching every move and gesture of their people, we will surely long for the best years of the American century. For the moment, we have only the kleptocracy of Donald Trump. Between praising the Chinese for their treatment of the Uighurs, describing their internment and torture as “exactly the right thing to do,” and his dispensing of medical advice concerning the therapeutic use of chemical disinfectants, Trump blithely remarked, “One day, it’s like a miracle, it will disappear.” He had in mind, of course, the coronavirus, but, as others have said, he might just as well have been referring to the American dream."
Nice finish
Def worth the read
You don't need to pity the U.S.
It's still a powerhouse of productivity, our main export
Our economy is still incredibly strong despite being crippled by covid
We have our issues
and then New York
But no need to pity the working class here
"People be dumb" is how I describe covid
And sometimes it do be like that
idk I'm still sad for all the people suffering
^
bashing the US is popular right now
articles get hits
well, i guess it's always popular
since 2016 
I mean, some of the bashing against the politics is not wrong, and not like the USA isn't doing the same always with china and the middle east
Oh, yeah, we have our problems
But we're about as politically well off as the U.K. right now
looks at UK parliament
But we're about as politically well off as the U.K. right now
that doesn't sound as good as you might hink it does xD
more well off
depends on who you pity
Speaking of first world problems, my caramel in my caramel macchiato from Starbucks this morning sank to the bottom and I didn't realize
I just drank straight caramel sauce
Oh god it's so sweet
I can't
the Sprite i got at McD was just bad tasting water yesterday, they forgot the sirup
Lol
RIP
Holy shit you guys are first world af
Isn't eating out expensive? Just make your coffe or tea at home it doesn't take too much time.
To be honest it's not since I got it for free :D but yeah
I usually make my own with my Nespresso machine in the morning but ran short on time
Mkay just boggles my mind when people do that on the regular. Only reason I would do it is to support a small bussiness.
Im too poor for that lmao
If you're college educated you probably have a good enough job to afford Starbucks when you're short on time
Thankfully a large portion of adults in the U.S. have at least an associate's
Not sure it it's a majority yet
thankfully all those degrees are worth something and they all have jobs
Mhm
Well I live in the NYC so everything is expensive
Isn't NYC ending anyways?
Lol
It'll just become new new york
people are really overstating the situation in NYC.
Depends on where you live, but people generalize
I've been in every part in new york but staten island
Instead of saying "parts of NY are on fire" they say "NY is on fire"
It's not as bad as people say it is and as far as I can remember there is always a part of new york city that's on fire.
It's the everburning flame
The city that never sleeps
But it sure takes a lotta weed naps
Too busy with the water buckets to sleep
well this is a /r/woooosh cuz I didn't get the reference.
Movie, half baked
Ah never watched it
Pineapple express is also fun
oh lol that was made before I was born lmao
You just can't beat the classics
I'll put it on my movie list that I'll watch with a few friends.
looks like the Bidens VP is Kamala Harris.
do progressives have an issue w/her? I thought there was something about her being a prosecutor of drug crimes that made her unappealing.
Kamala Harris is a dumbass and bs lawyer
Charming, JRoy.
she's made horrible decisions, withheld dna evidence as a DA, and has horrible constitutional opinions
Taken from JRE #1521 w/Josh Dubin and Jason Flom:
https://youtu.be/Trh7YWo2Bmo
Josh Dubin works with the innocence project
oh fun fact about the innocence project, one of the founders, barry scheck was part of OJ's dream team
(btw, that has nothing to do with the innocence project, its just an interesting factoid)
yeah, I pretty much think the pick is meaningless
unless, ya know, biden doesn't serve 4 years
he's only doing this because its a black women
which, lets be honest, is a real possibility
Is it just me or has there been some bad shit dug up about every single presidential candidate ever at least since I was a kid?
Honestly I just go with the person I have the fewest issues with
Yeah, fuck it, I don't expect perfect people anyway
Has Obama had some big scandal?
Also for the love of Christ don't let your vote get split. If you want to vote for a party and choose someone who is unlikely to win then you've just given the opposing party a free vote
Obama is no exception. He's had his fair share of stuff dug up during campaigns
It's always the same stuff. "They voted for abortions" or "they backed or were backed by big oil" and similar stuff
Sometimes it's more
But it's always meh
I remember some segment on Fox News about how he took a day off too spend a night with his wife.
They made it out to be some huge scandal
I was dying
yeah
I seriously cant recall one major scandal Obama was involved with
Im trying to remember
Well, there was benghazi, bengazi, bengahzi, benjamin ghazi, been gazin', benghazi, and benghazi. Oh and those times he wore a tan suit and asked for tastier mustard.
As for hiding evidence from the DA, show me a politician that hasn't done that and I'll show you a liar
We were a very stable country with Obama.
I'm not saying it's good, but not voting for someone based on that is BS
I mean what actually passed during Obama's admin is pretty mediocre/weak. He didn't deliver on getting out of Afghanistan/Iraq, the unconditional bailouts for financial institutions were a disgrace, he made 0 progress on climate change, the version of healthcare he passed was so watered down it barely helped put a dent in the problem.
Actually in some cases they might need to, such as in a matter of national security. Not saying that's what it was, but it's likely someone somewhere had to
Unrelated, but just saw this and although satire it's more relevant today than not https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84phU8of02U
The court ruled a white teen who stabbed a classmate to death will face the jury as a 300-pound black man. Onion News Network, Fridays at 10/9c on IFC.
He was a manager, not a reformer
I'm okay with not having reformers
We don't need reform
Well, we do, but not like this
I think that's a really difficult position to defend when you look at the state of the world, and the coming climate apocalypse.
In some areas we do
We have a reformer in office now
I'm burnt out on reformers for the time being
He couldnt make reform if he wanted. House and Congress were red during Obamas second term and they would not pass shit. He could have found and tried to distribute the cure for cancer but would have been shut down.
?role add @lethal rose Moderator
The government moves slow intentionally
He had the entire first term and squandered it.
?role all moderator
A lot of the reform we currently need is due to the currents administrations reaction to the nations issues.
Hehe
Sorry
Nothing
During gay right protests while we had Obama he stood and talked with the people holding these protests. Trump completely ignored BLM while sitting in the basement of the white house tweeting.
Dyno and other mod bots are configured properly here. Dyno isn't even here iirc
It's for IRC
wot
Well then it's configured properly. Stop trying to poke it
Smh
Adding everyone as a moderator is not how you pentest
Well
If you find a security issue your first course of action should not be "let everyone take control!"
At first i only tried to add myself
Then i decided to test the all command
It no work
Clearly
I got no mod 🙁
Go do productive things
I will
I just saw someone's replacement for "America"
AmeriKKKa.
Accurate.
Yes really
I don't think there's many current KKK members in the U.S.
It's not saying AmeriKKKa as in the KKK is leading the country. It's jabbing at the white nationalist agenda lol.
That's conflating the two
It's not that serious
It's kinda putting a whole lot of people into a tiny little box
Black Lives Matter
Indeed they do
It's kinda putting a whole lot of people into a tiny little box
Is there a problem with putting all the white nationalists into a box and then leaving that box on the side of the road?
Heh
The box ain't that tiny. Like I said, it's not KKK to say that the KKK is running the country. It's KKK 1) because it mimics the c that it replaces and 2) because the KKK is a white nationalist hate group. It's calling out the white nationalist agenda like I just said and you really cannot claim that Murica doesn't have that problem. Small box or not, the population should own it and then fix it so that it no longer has any sense of accuracy at all. Sorry it bothers you that people think of the USA like this, but people think of the USA like this.
Putting more than white nationalists in that box with "AmeriKKKa" though
We have our problems
Yeah, this is a term coming from other countries. Not internally. They called us that. We can't just be like "lol, but like u know. it's not everybody. dont call us that, aint accurate"
That's our image, sir
That's our legacy
It's a dramatic oversimplification for comedy value. Sure, fine, but that doesn't a valid point make
It's also not very funny, yeah
We also have police departments collaborating with literal Neo Nazis to beatand maim BLM protesters. It's not an exaggeration to say we have a white nationalist criminal justice system.
Once again: KKK in this context, not Ku Klux Klan but a symbol for White Nationalism.
AmeriKKKa.
Throw a good sterotypical American joke then fine. Not everything is a political agenda, AmeriKKKa is simply not funny.
Lol
"Uwu my feelings are hurt because the world sees America as a racist shithole"
Isn't even me saying that, though. I just copied it from some other guy.
Sorry y'all think it's so inaccurate tho.
It's not.
I'm not offended, but "AmeriKKKa" solves no problems, barely raises any awareness or issues, and isn't funny. It's just not good at anything
It's clever, I guess
That's about it
Wasn't the point of the sentence, he just changed "America" to "Amerikkka".
Here's his whole post for ya:
I can see it is parody of the unspoken reality in racist Amerikkka, whenever there is an incident involving black people mainstream culture always amplify the negativity to the extreme. Where it is a seriuos crime committed by rich white people it is always minimize if at all reported.
I thought it worked well.
Yeah, it's a clever punchline
It's getting very that way. With companies/universities implementing quotas.. soft bigotry of low expectations.
We also have police departments collaborating with literal Neo Nazis to beatand maim BLM protesters. It's not an exaggeration to say we have a white nationalist criminal justice system.
huh did I miss something?
yeah that's uh...pushing it
It’s really not, look into what’s happening in Portland
We dont have a white nationalist justice system
Thats literally insane
That kind of shit pisses me off
Cool 👍🏻
Labeling people who are not racist RACIST are not solving anything
Im 100% sure there are members of law enforcement who are racist/Prejudice/White nationalists
Does not make the Justice System or all a part of it a single one of those things
Wait did anyone read that document that was linked?
The one linked by josh?
If you haven't there is basically no information in the linked document
Well I'm going to assume it's credible for now. But all it outlines is concerns of possible white supremacist infiltration.
Right.
It’s the fbi who created it
And redacted most of it
This is the same as saying that the US goverment knew there where aliens because of the recent leaked report about UFOs. UFO != Aliens
There are white supremacists in Police departments 100%. THis does not make the whole system and/or the people under it a white supremacist.
Yeah I saw the redactions and most of the redactions don't look like they contain any relevant information to conclude that the whole justice system is run by white supremacists.
You would be delusional to say no one in the Police System has ever been a racist.
Just as delusional to say the whole system is and full of racists
Neither I nor anyone else in it said that. But not every member of an institution needs to be in Klan robes for them to be able to terrorize and kill minorities with impunity
If I where to compare the linked document it would be just the hypothesis part of an experiment.
Then show us one example of a whole entire police department in modern history being the last 4 years that "terrorize and kill minorities with impunity"
afaik I think last year the amount of unarmed black people killed was in the single digits or in the teens.
By police mind you.
Im all for BLM but the shit people come up with really dumbs down the cause
I'm for the cause not the BLM group.
I dont believe a single government branch is systematically racist. There are definitely people within these branches who are racist or/and prejudice
I'm for the cause not the BLM group.
@white wing See the problem with this is there is not one BLM group
If the people within the government branches are racist, and are allowed to set policy and determine enforcement that can lead to systemic racism
a group claimed.
Most of these groups that have claimed to lead the protests are pretty wild
the shit they come up with is insane
The BLM protesters are an enormous group compared to the original black lives matter organization
It doesn’t make sense to get fixated on that small group instead of the mass movement
BLM is not one group, well there is obviously a group called BLM but still. I support BLM but I do not support the agenda of a lot of these groups.
That’s reasonable
That's basically what I said then 😐
BLM is a Soclial Movement with multiple groups claiming its leading.
This does confuse many people
Considering how much ideological diversity there is within the movement it would be impossible to align with everyone
okay hold on what are these separate groups claiming to be the leaders of the BLM movement?
Do you actually know them or where you told about them in passing?
this causes problems because then people (majority conservative) see what some claim to be a part of the "BLM group" doing to local stores and they say BLM is a terrorist group whilst others (majority Liberal) see this as other people saying black lives dont matter :I
okay hold on what are these separate groups claiming to be the leaders of the BLM movement?
Do you actually know them or where you told about them in passing?
@white wing Not exactly leaders no.
Since BLM has died down some of these groups have started organizing these protests.
At the start it was people simply coming out to show support for black lives and reform to keep these innocent people from being killed so often.
It has progressively become more shit
I support the cause that "Black Lives Matter." vVery simple.
I dont support looting
It becoming more shit has a lot to do with cowboy idiot cops brutalizing people.
It still is people coming out and supporting black lives though. There are still peaceful protests.
Or some of these reforms which result in others having less rights
It becoming more shit has a lot to do with cowboy idiot cops brutalizing people.
@topaz gorge No.
yeah what?
Shooting state senators with rubber bullets, teargassing children, arresting journalists
It has become more shit because people think looting stores will change shit.
They also like free stuff.
The level of police brutality at these protests is insane
Not everything is a result of administrative corruption.
In almost all cases where police force was used it was because a protest became classified as a riot.
Retards started looting local stores.
People also get warned multiple times to move before force is used.
I also disagree with this
A protest being designated a riot is a subjective judgement call made by law enforcement
A majority of the police resistance was aimed twards peaceful protestors.
They were told to leave
It's not subjective though. You cause any property damage or start attacking people your protest will become a riot.
but were also exercising there rights peacefully
Yeah and most of those where proven false with more context.
And plenty of people were not given warning or a way out. Innocent people just walking by have been dragged into squad cars, beaten, maced etc
I sincerely doubt you have any idea what percentage were proven false, especially considering the complete lack of follow through and transparency
What I find ironic is how the National Guard and Whole Regions Police departments would line up to push back and dismiss peaceful protesting whilst local stores were protected by absolutely no one and were looted to shit.
i need to be president my pp is 0.1 inch
Heck I've even seen people record cops getting aggressive and claim police brutality even after people start throwing stuff at cops setting up a blockade.
i will make country better by giving away free popsicles
make me president
@white wing r u trump
Heck I've even seen people record cops getting aggressive and claim police brutality even after people start throwing stuff at cops setting up a blockade.
@white wing Im not denying this happens
What I find ironic is how the National Guard and Whole Regions Police departments would line up to push back and dismiss peaceful protesting whilst local stores were protected by absolutely no one and were looted to shit.
🙂
That’s the point though, just because someone throws something at you does not mean you can blow their eyeball apart with a rubber bullet
Which has happened multiple times already
NO ONE SHOULD BE THROWING ANYTHING
^
AND NO ONE SHOULD BE SHOOTING ANYTHING
Its from both sides.
Everyone is so one-sided these days
Look at it from both perspectives
can i be president pls
Police shouldn't be attacking peaceful protesters and protesters shouldn't be attacking police.
I’m not being one sided, but we should expect better behavior from cops than we do from random people in the street
But I'm not going to get angry at the police without proper context to the situation.
That is not nearly as wise and galaxy brained as you seem to think it is
Protesters who want to do so peacefully also should not hinder police from arresting violent ones.
If police become brutal after someone is attacking them then why shame the officer?
Surrounding them and protecting them, they become complicit in a criminal act.
Because it’s against the law to brutalize suspects. Let alone random people
oh yeah and james does put up a good point
This is the issue. Focus on the actual problem of police using unlawful force on innocent people.
There are a few videos of protesters protecting rioters.
This is also true
The answer to police brutality is more funding for training and appropriate equipment.
As well as reducing the power of all workers unions as a whole.
Lmao
thats the issue of the social ideology. Most people who stand for the cause could be and usually are peaceful but they justify rioting and looting in some way.
Anyways I rather not generalize and if I am going to get angry about something I'm not going to blame type of people for a event but the people who actually have something to do with the event.
There's no excuse for rioting and looting, and none for police brutality.
However if you don't adequately equip or train officers to handle situations that arise mistakes will happen.
Look if you riot and loot for a cause you're going to be diminishing your cause.
There are also always going to be those who just don't give a shit and will do what they want.
the whole "damaging property isn't violence" thing is really scary.
The reason why MLK death was so impactful was because he was peaceful.
Anyways I rather not generalize and if I am going to get angry about something I'm not going to blame type of people for a event but the people who actually have something to do with the event.
@white wing Exactly. This is how both issues should be dealt with. The racist, violent, and prejudice police are always focused on and this has had people claim the whole Policing system as racist. Some cunts during BLM protests have looted and rioted causing some to claim the whole movement of BLM is a terrorist act.
Well, current polling would suggest people are starting to feel that way lately Pencil.
As in, people as a whole in America.
I don't trust polling it's so unreliable
It started this year with fairly positive outlook from most American's, but that's changing fast.
Yeah I agree. That's why I said suggest.
saw this the other day https://news.gallup.com/poll/316571/black-americans-police-retain-local-presence.aspx 81% of black people want police to stay the same or increase their presence
I mean... that really should just end the whole defund the police thing right?
Yeah, I saw that too Machine.
Americas system is solid and is setup in such a way to be improved but we are just filled with such a Stupid and split population.
But yeah the whole group mentality has to stop. I mean someone earlier was trying to make my points moot by trying to label me as a trump supporter or something like that. Like what?
Well.. let me ask you this.. if you reduce funds to police where do they take the money away? It wont be guns, it might be tasers, bodycams, etc? Or maybe numbers?
That's only going to make the problem worse.
I think black business owners might want more police at this point.
If they have no option but to use lethal force in fear of their lives, they will more readily use it.
Well they also need more mandatory training.
But yeah the whole group mentality has to stop. I mean someone earlier was trying to make my points moot by trying to label me as a trump supporter or something like that. Like what?
@white wing Same brother. I have a opinion to a certain topic that labels me as a Trump supporter or a right wing conservative when this is not farther from the truth.
I agree 100%
The good cops are the one who take money out of their own pockets to do training on their own time.
Police who want more training have to fork out their own money in most instances to get it too.
Which is just stupid.
They should regularly be training.
Defunding is stupid
anyone see this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev373c7wSRg
subscribe! and - patreon.com/theboyscast
appreciate yall. I'm gonna put some cash into a big sketch in the next couple weeks. got lots cookin. share this with your friends. the youtube video. they do huge views everywhere but here so it would be greatly apprecited.
@faint radish yes totally
Just demilitarize
thought it was pretty hilarious
what does demilitarize mean though?
Yeah I think some of those military handouts are a bit stupid.
Well some police forces have purchased excess military equipment.
For a greatly reduced cost.
I think that should be looked at from an economics viewpoint.
Huh I mean in terms of equipment miltiary gear means nothing since a lot of the civilian stuff is more up to date and better.
They are given like tanks, surveillance drones, grenade launchers etc
The only thing the military has that's better is vehicles and full auto weapons.
If they're spending too much on these things that they don't probably need, and that money can go to more effective things, that has to change.
The point is they don’t need them at all. And if you give that stuff out it will be used
well you need the grenade launchers to launch smoke tubes.
1950s - 1960s A police reform came along that militarized the police and gave them hand outs of left over equipment/weapons from war.
They're not given, they have to pay for the equipment.
Not what I was taught
I am as well lol
You have a source?
I mean Im not calling you a lier id just like to be sure
No I don't, and if I Google it, it'll be tainted since it's what I'm looking for.
Let me see if I can figure out a decent search that isn't biased.
They were given the weapons and equipment through Defense Department program called 1033
The 1033 program that has given billions of dollars in extremely discounted military equipment started in the 1990s
But I agree that having this quantity of excess military equipment is another problem in if itself, our defense spending is ludicrous
oh if you really want to talk about police reform you guys should look into civil asset forfeiture, it really fucks up the incentives police have.
1960s gave them the ability to obtain this shit and the Defense Department program called 1033 started funding and giving this shit in 1990s
Civil asset forfeiture is totally fucked. Just like legalized piracy
Seki, that law is fundamentally fucked.
That's a really good article going on about it
They literally put the thing they seized on trial.
Yeah it fucks with all the insentives
And there’s no accountability. It’s ridiculous
And presumes guilty until proven innocent
Hey now, I like our defense spending. Just for very different and completely selfish reasons
Do you work for Northrop Grumman or something
lol our defense spending is nothing compared to our social spending
Well there is accountability, but not enough.
Pretty sure more money goes to defense
It's a lot of money
It’s 3.1 percent. But I don’t accept the premise that we shouldn’t spend way more on social programs
defense does get a lot of money but compare that to our social programs and there is a big gap
No we shouldn't spend more we should figure out why they're so damn high
hoqw tf is 17% going to medicare
Insurance company profiteering
You guys want my source?
Something something education
USAspending.gov is the new official source of accessible, searchable and reliable spending data for the U.S. Government.
fucking awesome site
those numbers I showed are from 2019
Because the regulations give insurance companies no incentive to compete.
I also think this is only on the federal level so states themselfs could be spending even more.
$570 Billion is still 10000x more then should be given to defense
it's not a billion
So much of defense spending is just grift
it's 1 trillion
We dont need 10 new warships every year when we already have 100 more then the country behind us
lol, gov should def not increase spending... in education for example, more money is spent per pupil in public schools than private schools, but private schools offer a better education...
A lot of it goes to cyber security, not traditional warfare
Private schools don’t have to teach the poor or disabled
The problem right now is that the US is the police of the world and no other NATO country want to spend more on military to help the US out.
I mean, military spending is a tough one. You're dealing with things on a global scale due to where America has positioned itself power-wise.
Trying to keep our power grid, etc out of the hands of Russia
China and Russia are real threats to freedom in my opinion.
That costs
Yeah basically add my point to james point
Our military budget is kinda crazy, but we're the country that deals with everyone else's shit on top of our own
so it makes sense
America needs it's allies to spend more on military so we can cut back on ours.
I sincerely doubt that us cyber security funding comes anywhere close to weapons systems
I can't really say I'm anywhere knowledgeable enough to even guess how much money the US military needs.
but it probably is a little inflated
cyber stuff IS a weapons system
We shouldnt deal with other peoples shit especially in the middle east lmao
The top air force in the world is the USAF the second best airforce in the world is the USNAVY.
Just to give perspective.
Anti-weapons systems and cyber security is where the work is right now
the US is pretty much forced into everyones foreign policy
JRoy I'd agree, I think a lot of money is wasted by the military
I find it funny that like 6 years ago, dems were ALL for getting out of the middle east, but when trump wants to leave, they are like, its a bad idea
the US is pretty much forced into everyones foreign policy
@pure jetty No.
The excess equipment is just a nice example.
We arent forced
The US is NATOs big pit bull.
we put ourselves in these situations
some yes
What dems are saying we shouldn’t get out of the Middle East?
but the US literally the super power for a reason
We should get out
I mean having a big military put the US in a very good position for making global policies.
We should not be in the Middle East at all
never should have
They dont want us there and most people dont want to be there
You know, that's interestingly one of the things a certain President was claiming they want.
we should have been but to a way smaller extent. Should have just been special forces that where sent out to get osama bin laden.
Make the other NATO countries pay their way for their own defence force.
I think that's what every president wanted tbh
NATO only exists so Europe does not get ass fucked by Russia. That was og goal.
I mean it just makes sense
If we weren’t there in the first place 9/11 would never have happened. Your thinking is predicated on a bad premise
Oh yeah you're right
History exists before 2000
I forgot about the stuff before 2001
The reason terrorists hate us so much is because we keep calling ourselves number 1
well that and we have freedom of thought
That's the reason everyone hates u
That's one possible explination
that's why Canada never gets a plane driven into it
Doesn't matter much why
nobody is going after number 2
Terrorist dont like us because we are shaming and killing them.
It absolutely matters why.
well that is what happens when you are number 1, everyone attacks the top
We also don't invest in a lot of money to improve the infrastructure in the countries that we invade. We just trash it instead.
arguing about the past doesn't solve problems and isn't useful discourse
And hating freedom is not a reason. It’s a reaction to specific bad choices we made.
I think when a country is as successful as USA there are going to be people who wish to tear that down.
I mean your not wrong but what's the point of saying that?
If someone doesn't like someone else calling themselves first in a sector enough to fly a plane into buildings and kill thousands then I don't see how that's the braggart's fault
not sarcastic btw actually curious and missing the point.
I actually think hating freedom is a very valid reason.
Seems like some personal issues
Tbh most situations we have been attacked has been by our own interference. Competition has been Arms and Economic race.
well that is what happens when you are number 1, everyone attacks the top
You can be number 1 and be like "hey I am at the top let me help y'all get on my level" or you could be like "suck it I'm number 1"
You mean me Seki?
Like, yeah, it's obviously not a great look, but you want to kill people over it?
It’s not personal issues. Like you can literally read the statements put out by bin laden about what the justification was
What's the point of mentioning that everyone want's to attack the #1 spot in this context?
Sounds a lot like personal issues, yes
bin laden is creditable /s
People want to attack who claim they are #1. If we shut up more we would be in better situations.
It’s mostly related to our support of Israeli occupation of Palestine, and US military occupation in Muslim countries
Oh and yeah Japan is a great example of the US helping foreign country that used to be it's enemy rise to the top.
My point was due to the success, the US economic system flourishing. That could be a motivation for people to try and tear the system down.
Clearly to some people it's worth killing over, but I fail to see how that's the U.S.'s fault there
We should stop flexing our warships and fix the Education System.
if only it was that easy
Yes, Bin Laden is a trustworthy fellow.

It is that easy
I can vouch for him.
So I should believe you? Because you had an idea and typed it?
I don't think money is a problem with our education system though.
You have zero evidence
Lets stop building 10 warships a year even tho we have 100 more then the nation behind us
That argument can easily be applied to you too Josh.
You know how much money a warship is? My school is falling aprt.
It goes nowhere fast.
Fixing education is not just throwing more money at it
Now helping an enemy and occupying territory I can actually understand
Why because I brought up the actual evidence? Instead of conjecture?
1/1000 of warship money would fix my school and actually put some toilet paper in our bathrooms
not really into decreasing military spending rn, not with China doing its thing...
has never been a time in history where the top power, and the rising power did not go to war...
Fixing education is not just throwing more money at it
@pure jetty Where I live it is.
People want to ignore the facts so they can inject ideology instead
large parts of education in the US isn't federated
Yes I know how much money a war ship is though I also went through the NYC education system which is trash but also gets a shit ton of funding.
^^
It's pretty rare that throwing money at a problem solves it. At least from the lower-levels
the problem isn't just money, it's what is being taught
Right in that situation its more reform then finding
People seem to forget this country is Very big and diverse
also self governed
I personally think it's the standardized tests.
At some point the money has to actually do something useful
large parts of education in the US isn't federated
Same in Germany, but it still works a lot better 🤷 that's definitely not the reason why it is so shitty
They werent that bad when I was in school but the new testing system that NYC is adopting makes no sense.
Standardized testing is shit.
It’s also that schools are expected to be frontline responses to everything that can go wrong with children. They are getting food, healthcare, social services etc all from schools
The biggest effective change they could make to schools, is outlaw the postcode bs.
federal gov has very little power over states
as it should be 💯
Let people pick what ever school they want.
Because we don’t invest in the infrastructure to provide that any other way
Same here when it comes to education jroy
lol yeah, school choice would be great
yeah split of power is good
School funding should be decoupled from property values
Then schools have to actually compete for students.
The states do everything
federal gov has very little power over states compared to Germany
@pure jetty When it comes to distributing state funds it does.
You mean federal funds
^
You guys remember when the white house was withholding Corona Virus relief money/act at the start of the pandemic.
I don't think it withheld any?
Man we could have used those ventilators 🙂
Now he's trying to give it. ORANGE! MAN! BAD!
@shut vine NEver
Once
Said
This
I'm just annoyed at the media. Not you.
Don’t you get why it’s most important to do a good job at the beginning of a pandemic?
Orange man a perfect indicator how good your school system is
Im not shaming the Orange Man. I am shaming his overall administration for the slow and shit reaction to the start of the pandemic.
Yeah I agree.
The media is not saying trump is bad for now giving funding. That’s just a made up thing you’ve decided to get mad about
according to usaspending.gov federal money towards education only really goes to specialized stuff.
yeah, lots of issues there. I do remember him banning travel from china in like feb right? and pelosi calling that racist tho...
I just dislike how now he wants to give it and it's a bad thing somehow.
it's not really up to feds for education money
Who is saying it’s a bad thing
BoE is state-level
What are you even talking about
I try to remove myself from news and politics so I'm a bit behind, but I don't remember the white house actually holding off on relief just because. There were delays in agreements, but that happens
Democrats
Name one?
fuck I missed a large portion of the convo because I was looking up stats
Like Twitter people or real people
They rejected it in the house/senate, so he used EO to get the funding out there.
It's politics, you missed little
Lets not start shitting and blaming shit on groups consisting of millions of people.
Please
Democrat vs Republican is stupid.
Mhm
I meant the party, not the individuals.
Crazy crackhead redneck republican living on my street corner had nothing to do with the pandemic killing us.
Turns out there's a bunch of people out there and they all have different opinions and don't all think exactly alike. Who knew?
I meant the party, not the individuals.
@shut vine Exactly what im saying.
They rejected bills for cutting unemployment benefits
Blame the individuals not the group they are a part of
Which is not the same thing as turning down federal money for covid 19 management
lmao trump himself is an idiot when it comes to COVID but he's not the one really handling the situation.
I mean I'm pretty sure the presidents job is just to delegate work out to other people.
Fuck knows what it actually means to be conservative or liberal anyway. It's just a bunch of name calling at this point.
I'm 50/50 on that Seki, to be honest, he's had a revolving door.
Also yeah stop with the tribal thought shit it's not very American at all.
He is a shit president.
Trump is supposed to give guidance
Like realistically he's picked the people who are advising him now.
^
Someone is going to need to clear cabinet later
what james said
That'll be a fun job
I don't think you can expect your president to be an expert on all matters, so gaffs are fine.
When the President does not know what he is doing you dont blame the peopel behind him first.
He’s the commander in Chief. He fucked up so badly at the beginning of this it’s a disgrace.
he's only president because obama roasted him
Reasonably though, no one has really had to deal with this situation in recent history.
The whole idea that the President gets to create the White House administration IS SO FUCKING STUPId
Gaffs are not fine if the gaff is saying that Coronavirus is not a threat. Or that it will be over by Easter
Trump is nothing new in terms of outrageous presidents
Also a lot of states have individual control over their states response to the situation.
well the countries that are more dictatory are dealing with it fine.
he's just everything in one
Also a lot of states have individual control over their states response to the situation.
this, but trump should give a clear message
They need federal cooperation to manage a disaster of this scale. Not to mention the fact that they are all going bankrupt because tax revenue is down so much
I agree JRoy.
I am critical of him, but also critical of those blaming all the problems in the world on him.
Either way none of the number that we have on COVID are very accurate.
Lmao imagine seeing what has happened and thinking the response is fine
One of the reason this is the worst presidency is because anything he does wrong is always defended and shit brought to the public is how he said the continent asia to who happened to be a asian reporter.
🙂
Main issue is that somehow science became political so now we have people deeply opposed to factual information simply because of their affiliation
No idea how that happened
But hey
I mean.. prior to the pandemic which some would argue are his fault.. he had the lowest unemployment rate of a president since what.. the 70s?
His administration took emergancy funds without congress/house approval to start construction on the wall but LOOK TRUMP SAID ASIA TO ASIAN REPORTER
Main issue is that somehow science became political so now we have people deeply opposed to factual information simply because of their affiliation
on both political parties too
Yeah
I fail to see how the markets doing well has any relevance to his response to corona
His administration took emergancy funds without congress/house approval
congress' fault for giving him this power
Doesn't matter who, just that it has
House of Cards predicted that exact thing
Markets are currently doing well in at least part because we expect them to
according to https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
The US has administered the 2 most amount of COVID tests the next two combined don't surpass the amount of tests the US has done.
On the other hand the US is not on the top in terms of deaths per million but on the top 10 and in terms of total cases per million the US is ranked 9.
Markets are expectation
The scariest possibility is the power the Bush administration gave to presidents to form ECG's.
If many expect the DOW to go down, it will
An ECG could be formed technically under the COVID19 pandemic.
Most people do not have investments in stock
Doesn't matter
And unemployment is way up
Basically there are a lot of variables to consider before you can make a good comparison of the US response to covid vs other countries. Plus you can't even rely on these number being accurate.
Mass panic affects all
according to https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
The US has administered the 2 most amount of COVID tests the next two combined don't surpass the amount of tests the US has done.
On the other hand the US is not on the top in terms of deaths per million but on the top 10 and in terms of total cases per million the US is ranked 9.
@white wing But like you said the most tested. Deaths per tested case aside main statistic we should look at is deaths.
And not even mass panic is required
Most people do not have investments in stock
proof?
@shy gulch I mentioned a lot of variables there not just msot tested.
People expected prices to keep falling, so they did. Economy took a tumble
these are all just made up numbers that we gamble on
What I said is actually not right, like 55% of people have some kind of investment, mostly through company retirement plans
Japan was quite fucking for some time. Took massive effort and some near bankruptcies to fix it
There is also the fact that there are reports of deaths being ruled SARS-CoV-2 related just based on them testing positive.
yes there is that too I think colorado included a new law fixing that and number droped a shit ton.
the problem for that too is that we don't know too much about it even now
There's an interesting episode on Planet Money about Japan's prices falling and what a dramatic rise or fall could mean for the U.S.
so we don't know the full effects of the virus
so we can't rule out any deaths
that being said
The problem right now is people making conclusions too quickly on information that might not even be credible.
The whole argument that a death is not a covid death if the person has a preexisting condition is stupid. Its not black and white. We do a shittt load of testing so we should not go off case numbers. Main statistic is deaths and we are leading in them.,
Well we know a lot more than we did previously. The death per infection rate is similar to a regular flu.
the stats are misused to clickbait things
Just that the rate of infection seems much higher.
@shy gulch if someone was in a car crash and died due to head trauma in the past if they also had COVID they would be labeled as COVID death.
There is speculation that's based on the number of asymptomatic carriers. Which is a plausible theory.
@shy gulch if someone was in a car crash and died due to head trauma in the past if they also had COVID they would be labeled as COVID death.
@white wing Link me to this incident or one like this?
we still don't know if the virus is harmless to asymptomatic people
It's happened, but those extreme cases are not common enough to make a large dent in the data
How many people have died while having something like severe head trauma and happened to have covid as well. Even if it was one person thats 1+ to the account of hundred of thousands
You’re saying we don’t know the incubation period which I think is also not right
we don't know if asymptomatic people are asymptomatic
asymptomatic can just refer to not showing symptoms.
and yeah that ^
the fuck you on about
we still know very little about this virus
"facts" about the virus are being rushed due to everyone being so invested in it
The incubation period has been shown to depend on unknown factors.
@shy gulch the reason why I say that is because colorado enacted a law that dropped COVID number by a large margin from what I heard. I could try and find a source.
So you are saying tons of people may have it, be being hurt by it and not know? How does that make sense? What is the silent ailment?
and we start to assume things that have little to no backing
Correct.
Just because we don’t know all the factors doesn’t mean we don’t know the incubation period
I live in Colorado, I don't remember that happening but I could be blind
So you are saying tons of people may have it, be being hurt by it and not know? How does that make sense? What is the silent ailment?
Yes
long term
Their may be outliers but we still have a range
there are some studies coming out about that
Ah here is an article that talks about it but I have yet to vet it.
linking it to blood types too
If it were dramatic enough I probably would have seen it
Could we agree that the criteria for a death to be ruled as a SARS-CoV-2 related death should be the same as an influenza related death?
Main goal should be suppressing the already rapid spread in to keep it from spreading to someone who is prone to death from such virus.
but if you get hit by a bus
Well not specifically the same, has to be related to the symptoms of course.
it shouldn't be a covid death
I don't know what the criteria is though.
There should reasonably be two to three categories. Caused by SARS-CoV-2, likely related, and possibly SARS-CoV-2 related.
What examples are their of people getting hit by buses and being ruled covid deaths? I get there’s some ambiguity when it comes to Co morbidity of other ailments. But that is a terrible example
there's some strange examples of what is considered a covid death
Anyways if I was a medical professional or someone in a government position of power. I would rather our estimates be larger than smaller, so people can act with more caution.
The funding for health department is so inadequate they can’t even do the data entry fast enough. Good luck establishing consistent national standards
Even if there are examples are there enough to actually affect the underlying issue.
who knows
But if you corrupt the data with a bad process.. you have tainted it completely.
i don't really care
As is always the case, the media tends to report the outliers because it makes better titles. Sure, we should fix them, but it's not going to affect the data much
lets just lower the god-damn spread, yo
For example one instance of ruling a death COVID related when the person planted their head into the road at 100mp/h is probably a sign you are not properly collecting data.
James the data was always corrupt, it was not consistently collected. It’s a hodgepodge of data sets from state and local agencies with wildly different standards and working conditions
I personally thing you won't be able to judge properly how any country dealt with this pandemic until everything is done and over.
yeah
years later
when people aren't invested in it
too much media clickbait shit rn
Yep.
As is always the case, the media tends to
And this, boys and girls, is what we call an oxymoron
We can easily agree on that one.
For example one instance of ruling a death COVID related when the person planted their head into the road at 100mp/h is probably a sign you are not properly collecting data.
@shut vine But how many cases of incidents like this have been reported that its making a difference to a number of 165k
Like even the most controlled data collection during this was the equivalent of war time reporting, so it’s a fantasy to think that it’s the insane examples that are the big issue
People saying that the US has been doing good or bad are not being genuine or are just ignorant.
^
That has to be a lot of people getting into severe accidents then unluckily getting covid
nobody knows
Instead of say, funding the CDC and state healthcare agencies better so they had the resources they needed from the beginning
people who say they know are lying!
We've been doing "eh" from my perspective, though my perspective is limited
Quibbling over the exact number is just a way of shifting responsibility. It’s just barely less relevant than trump calling it the China virus as if that helps any of us now
@shy gulch Colorado changed their policy regarding how they classified COVID deaths and their number dropped from over 1k to 870 ish.
Do you get the math of that doesn’t matter?
I liked one article talking about that not too long ago
The estimation is over 160,000
It literally doesn't matter, once you know that sort of thing gets through it erodes your trust in statistics. I've not read any specific thing related to the road accident situation, but if one of those incidents happened, there is something critically wrong in the reporting process at the hospital and probably the state that it happened in.
Yeah but again the number don't matter at the moment
if someone has a underlying immune issue and then dies from covid I 100% consider it a death
As I said before you guys talking bout the US or any countries response with the current information we have means nothing.
If someone has cancer and then they get covid and dies from covid effecting them I consider it a death
I'm not sure what arguing over what exactly entails a covid death gets us. It's an exercise in pedantics
Or let’s say if an entire nursing home gets covid, or choir group
I disagree. I only agree when the symptoms caused by SARS-CoV-2 could reasonably be concluded to be a contributing factor in the death.
Its not that difficult to come to the conclusion that covid sped up the process of someones cancer and sealed the deal of death.
If someone has brain cancer, dies with SARS-CoV-2, roughly around the time they were expected, and they died from internal bleeding, how is that a SARS-CoV-2 death?
And what if aliens abduct us and give us all cancer anyway?
The symptoms caused by covid could completely overlap with symptoms that were already present, say if someone had an autoimmune disease and tested positive for covid it’s impossible to differentiate what caused what
You can't just use a test kit.. oh they had SARS-CoV-2.. that's another one.
What's the point of this rabbit hole?
I just dont think the argument that the deaths are heavily exaggerated is solid.
It’s just a way for people to make excuses for our terrible response. If you just say the numbers are all wrong you can deny the scale of the problem
Look hospitals from what I heard hospitals have an incentive to label deaths as COVID deaths to get more federal funding. If this is true it's very possible the COVID deaths are overexaggerated. By how much we don't really know.
Covid treatment is actually extremely costly and unprofitable for hospitals
I worked at a hospital and my mom is a doctor at a cancer clinic in a hospital
There are no incentives to label a death as covid
Many nurses and doctors are having their hours and pay cut because they can’t make money from more profitable health care
And if there are it needs to have more attention brought to it because thats absolutely insane.
I mean, that's just as anecdotal as a single incident of the bus driver someone was talking about.
What is anecdotal
You are gonna tell me having a experience in a hospital is anecdotal but a bus drivers incident is not.
🤨
I'm saying both are anecdotal.
“Even with billions from Congress, hospitals set to lose over $1K per COVID-19 case”
You had a complaint about that anecdote.
Seriously we are going to extremes to defend your side of this debate
The bus driver thing was completely made up
wait I'm confused so hospitals getting more patients mean they go bankrupt?
Wait what?
It depends on the type of treatment
I'm guessing it may have something to do with elective surgeries?
I'm betting elective surgeries are a huge source of income for a hospital.
Health Insurances and hosiptal costs cant keep up
Hospitals here are heavily getting cuts due to the overall economy and covid
I think part of it may also be having to spread patients out more?
Though Pencil probably knows more.
Actually large insurance groups are making record profits
Yeah, people can't claim their benefits?
THe overall economy is shit and hospitals are not obtaining funds fast enough to keep up with patience
Or are unwilling to?
I mean in NYC there are still surgeries taking place even ones that aren't life threatening.
I know because my mom had one a few months ago to move a nerve.
Yes.
Covid is disproportionately affecting the elderly and poor, people who’s insurance is either nonexistent or covered by government programs. The reimbursement rates for hospitalization of these patients gives way less revenue to the hospital
Meanwhile people with insurance are putting off medical treatment because they don’t or are not allowed to come in
Interesting
It’s a feedback loop
Right.
Sounds reasonably true.
That’s why I think insurance companies are basically parasitic in nature
But that’s another topic really
Overall its difficult to keep up with everything during this time especially funding
Forcing employers to provide it to employees exasperates that issue.
Having 1000000 patience in a hospital is not the same as having 1000000 lined up to buy your famous bread at your bread store.
again making stern conclusions on an areas response to COVID right now is illogical.
Yeah, I agree with that.
You keep saying that but I still don’t see how that is obvious at all. There’s so much incompetence and denialism that has been plain and in the open from the beginning
I wish my country had have closed its borders a lot sooner.
I don’t care about our relative rankings, I just care that we should expect so much better
The reason why I say that is because information about COVID keeps on changing and will keep changing until we figure out a vaccine.
Even if 25k reported deaths are exaggerated that still leaves 140k -_-
I think generally having a rigid idea about what is and what isn't especially in something as complex as this probably isn't very wise.
This argument is so stupid
Even after, there are going to be experts who don't agree.
Yeah I’m trying to hear them out but I’m not getting the logic at all
yeah and what if instead of 140k deaths it's 165k deaths?
That 25k makes a difference.
Your example has been someone dying from brain trauma from a car crash whilst having covid but what are the chances of a incident even remotely related to this happening>
?
No it doesn’t. 140,000 is also unacceptable
Understanding why 140k happened is important in my opinion.
The point is that you haven’t shown any evidence for the problem of measuring deaths being at such a scale as to make the handling justified
Not the number itself.
Your example has been someone dying from brain trauma from a car crash whilst having covid but what are the chances of a incident even remotely related to this happening? @white wing Ive yet to see a response?
Understanding why matter which is why it’s completely valid to be critical of the innumerable unforced errors we all saw happen
Way after we should have known better
I did respond you you with the colorodo numbers.
If I get a single anecdote you're going to say that it's an anecdote.
Here's something I found Googling for it: https://www.inquirer.com/health/coronavirus/coronavirus-covid19-cause-death-certificate-pcom-20200401.html
I did respond you you with the colorodo numbers.
@white wing You did not respond to my next question of how is colorodo considering deaths. I consider having cancer or a underlying immune issue and then dying from covid a death.
It doesn't specifically highlight examples, just a failure in how they were ruling deaths covid related.
I'm unsure of the validity of head trauma being blamed on covid.
I don't have to if my argument is that there is new information about covid every day and daily and past number are not accurate.
Its easy to start a conspiracy that numbers are being heavily exaggerated but not that states are now narrowly considering covid deaths covid deaths to look better.
I listed colorado because it's a good example of number changing.
Colorados stance on the virus and its state government is SHIT
The number could be higher or lower we don't know. We also don't know if they are vastly large or lower.
There is new information about covid everyday is obvious and means nothing in this context. The question is how accurate is accurate enough
Colorado has been a big denier since the start
What are your thoughts on changing the CDC reporting mechanism to the one DHS has?
That doesn't change my argument that making decisive options about how any area handles COVID atm is not logical.
And you haven’t shown any real evidence for the scale of the problem being anywhere near high enough
Lets give the reporting number system to another shit Government sub branch
ah yes
The numbers are not being heavily exaggerated. Sure maybe 3 times someone died from a brain trauma while having covid so go ahead and subtract 3 from 165k 👍
Could that not be used to manipulate numbers? Or is that just a conspiracy theory too?
Downplaying the seriousness of the threat is bad policy. Full stop.
Seriously.
It’s not illogical to think that because it’s not perfectly clear the exact number of dead
I don't think anyone was actually advocating that either.
Americans are always trying to dumb shit down and make themselves look beter but simple fact is its bad.
Maybe I'm mistaken.
It's better to up-play the number but also making decisive opinions on how an area handled a situation at this time is dumb
He was saying that we can't draw any conclusion yet.
Unless he said something I missed maybe.
no that's all I've been trying to say
Could you please show your evidence of him saying that?
Dont change topics. We started with dont make conclusions yet and this led into a Exaggerated numbers debate.
I've actually repeated the statement a 3 times now but it's flew past peoples heads.
what?
That doesn't change my argument that making decisive options about how any area handles COVID atm is not logical.
Is the quote
Downplaying the seriousness of the threat is bad policy. Full stop.
@topaz gorge who claimed that it's not serious?
That's the topic we are on.
Plenty of local, state and federal authorities have downplayed the threat and continue to downplay the threat
Yeah I agree.
And have resisted taking the steps needed
Seki is saying I shouldn’t come to that conclusion
If the numbers are heavily exaggerated (which they arent) we should not be debating this until the issue is fixed. Same shit as retards saying mask requirements are against there right whilst the whole country is being affected.
This is what I was confused about. Makes sense now, I feel stupid.
Even though it’s as plain as day
No I didn't say that at all. If you're talking about policies sure make that conclusion if you're talking about numbers you're being illogical.
Wait till the pandemic is over before coming up with crazy conspiracies that DO come off ad downplaying the situations.
You assumed I implied something I didn't mean to imply.
You are being illogical if you think that the numbers are in enough doubt to put them into a range that is somehow different enough to matter
Maybe it was unintentional but saying we dont have as many deaths as the record sates, even saying it could be in the thousands of fake numbers, IS DOWNPLAYING
It's not through if that's what actually happened
It seemed more like him bringing up a concerning situation that seemed to have political motivations.
Well, I think it has political motivations, however that's just conjecture.
You want to go through rereading this long debate be my guest but im telling you what has been said.
huh?
