#(Astro/Theoretical) Physics and Mathematics
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
I grew up with celcius and I still find it more intuitive than any other
Same
my parents only used celsius until I was like 12
Im used to 0C being freezing of water, under 10C its cold, 14C it gets better, 18C is nice, 21C OOOO, 25C max, 30C help
then into the negatives its also pretty cool how it directly relates to ice thickness
ew 21C is so warm
-1C = 1cm ice
its crazy
In India, 30C was normal lol
we are now seeing temps reach 45C where my parents live
our heat record is set at 40.7C
our cold record is like -20C or smth
this scale though wtf
agreed
so 9T(Celcius)/5 + 32 = F
Yes
thats one hella painful conversion
Between 0 and 100 f is comfort
aww
Gotta drive lol brb
"Several accounts of how he originally defined his scale exist, but the original paper suggests the lower defining point, 0 °F, was established as the freezing temperature of a solution of brine made from a mixture of water, ice, and ammonium chloride (a salt). The other limit established was his best estimate of the average human body temperature, originally set at 90 °F, then 96 °F (about 2.6 °F less than the modern value due to a later redefinition of the scale)."

I rather multiply by 1.602176565*10^-19 to get to J than use strange conversions to get like idk some american unit for energy
dude just made shit up and it became a scale
Like loaded shotguns per square inch or smth
This method sounds so... unscientific
You dont define a 0 point using a mixture 💀
F has such a bad definition of what it actually feels like
Kelvin and C were defiend using dH2O
idk even know what that is in C
let me calculate it
90-32 = 68
so 5*68/9
that is... 340/9
the gap between differences in temperature gets insane the further you go up
its 32.2C lol
yeah I was about to say approx 34C but 32.2C thats low
A scale done by guessing is so unscientific
yea I never read into how F was developed but damn its a complete arbitrary scale
Also did you know the size of a foot is not the same everywhere
so if you use the unit "foot" you need to first know which
feels like values when using °F are so funny
how is it going to be 90 with a feels like of 110 or more those are way different numbers
Its called ur heat budget
interesting, prob very rare to see someone outside murica/uk/canada/oz to use fahrenheit
Why is it difficult to find the big G?
Dark Matter and Dark Energy
Such a high entropy set-up, isn't it?
@amber nimbus how exactly is obliquity removed during the process of tidal locking
Some kinda dissipation when the object stretches in certain ways, right?
Think of it as a ball
An elastic one
What happens if you pull on it from one side
tidal locking is a state of equilibrium; an object w/ significant axial tilt relative to its orbital plane will be out of equilibrium
to make this easier to imagine, we can set up a thought experiment:
instead of a typical, almost-spherical satellite, imagine that satellite as an elongated object like a rod (some small moons are actually pretty elongated)
in a state of equilibrium, the length of this rod will point consistently towards the parent planet's center. introducing axial tilt means this will no longer be true, and therefore typical methods of dissipating energy will apply until equilibrium is achieved
Pi can be written as a fraction or as an equation
Learn More About Opera One: https://opr.as/Opera-browser-PBS-Space-Time
PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to: http://to.pbs.org/DonateSPACE
Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord!
https://www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime
A few weeks ago a large team of gravitational wave astronomer...
Big stuff this
π=π/1
Ayooooo
EUCLID
IS NUTS
Natural units are based
Why don't we say block 1 with mass M1 collides with block 2 with mass m2
real question is +,-,-,- or -,+,+,+
Nyehehehe
One of my favorites is log(i²)/i
But I prefer the sqrt sum method
@low shell lmfao
I hate these identities 😭
Actually nah
The 2nd one is based
I agree
First claimed successful replication of LK-99
Accomplished by a team at the Huazhong University of Science and Technology and posted 30 minutes ago.
Why this is evidence:
The LK-99 flake slightly levitates for both orientations of the magnetic field, meaning it is not simply a…
5823
1918
Oh wow it was replicated
Oh read the whole tweet lol
Actually, yes, but further tests on diamagnetism is still needed
But that gives it 60-70% that we have touched gold already
Scientists are now extra cautious on that discovery because of Diaz scandal
Either a Nobel prize is in order or this is going to be a really funny drama
But with that development, stars seem to lean to the former, and this discovery is not just a Nobel Prize qualifier, this would be a world-changer, by being a potential king-maker to technological innovations that could be as impactful as ChatGPT
lol this would be waaay more impactful than chat GPT
In in itself, no
I’m still skeptical for now but a lot of my doubts have been answered
But quantum computers and nuclear fusion they are
yes that’s my point
As we should
someone finding a possible theoretical basis is huge too
Yes, at least, we're getting a step away from a Diaz repeat
Should help with particle physics too probably
If this result is true this is a pretty good time to be an experimentalist
Or a theorist ig
Regardless, Physics is a drug intelligent humans can't quit, but at least, this provides real benefits to the world
Yeah good summary imo
Quantum computers already work and the European supercomputer is coupled to the big one in Paris, France. And Fusion well Helion is pretty close now with their new reactor taking shape and ITER ramping up. At least that is what I could get from reading the CERN courant
We are in a pretty big era for science rn
Second quantum revolution
Ffs bot
That's at CERN ^^
Physics is like sex. Except it's better
Then it's a best decision for a sexless man like me to pursue Physics
Lmao
Tbh if you do it right physics can get you girls

Chemistry and Physics both are great girls attractors I noticed ever since I started wearing my CERN shirt and hoodie lmao
Has the literal SMOP equation on it
Acting confident helps too
Actually girls come naturally if you know yourself yes
Actually I would like to be in between Quantum Information and Quantum Field Theory in my research, want to pursue my passion, but also want something to build a business with
Hopefully I'll find my ikigai there
I remember when a girl (a friend of my best friend) asked me what I planned to pursue. i said physics and meteorology
She started flirting so so hard
💀💀
Well we kinda had this chemistry going on all the time
Did you reply to her with an intention to be her boyfriend heehee
But would you accept her if she asked you to be her boyfriend
Perhaps
Id ask her for a dinner + movie date first
But yeah she is defo my type
Also I got three copies of this
I also follow CERN/ATLAS on insta
But yeah Quantum Field Theory is even more interesting, right now it's helping Quantum Information Science and after that, it might revolutionize HEP/Cosmology once again
It's exciting both in near-term and medium-term
What are the specifications of that telescope again?
Test images
Like what's the payload
Massive camera. Antimatter collector, antennas, instruments
Also has a biggg mirror
Proxy study of DM/DE yet again
The fact that we don't even properly know how to observe DM and DE because we don't know exactly who's them makes HEP more interesting
This is a proper one actually
Euclid is designed to directly map out the influences
Its a game changer
Well, influences
Of course
We dont know what its made of and we cant directly detect it
By studying practically the entire sky in great detail it should become clear
Esp with the muons and antimatter
Or there's even a theory that DE is just well, gravity
Hyperbolicization of spacetime by black hole's gravity to be precise
But again, like in KPOP, still a hypothesis
KPOP also has a lot of rumors but that;s not our topic
Cern is pretty sick
They are building the new 100km collider's tunnel already
Due in 2029
That theory and extraordinary claim was debunked rather fast
Didnt account for the total numbers and influence observed
Hopefully their detectors don’t have the same reconstruction issue that they currently have lol
Yep lol
I heard abt that yeah
I know that a child object’s gravitational dominance zone is not a sphere, but how is the “hill sphere” defined?
A hill sphere of a planet is where something less massive can orbit the planet, not too close where tidal forces rip the moon apart, and not too far where the sun’s gravity would play tug-of-war with the planet and the moon’s orbit is unstable
Basically the place where an orbiting object could have a stable orbit
I mean the official mathematical definition
I remember how universe sandbox legacy would show them
Not really Theoretical Physics since this is Neural Network but is honestly intriguing how to replicate such compactification at least as a dual of known compacifications in HEP
that is the maximum region of stability, not an object's hill sphere
a satellite can be within an object's hill sphere and still have an unstable orbit
Its physics so its fine here
And also you said "and Mathematics", NN is Math 🤓
Yeah correct
No need for nerd emoji it fits
The region of space around an object where a satellite could orbit indefinitely is called the Hill sphere, roughly defined as where the object's gravitational field is stronger than that exerted by another object outside the sphere.
Via Newscientist
The math gets fun to say the least
@unique dragon enjoy lmao
Wait I can torture @keen igloo with this
suffer
Non
oh
sorry there
so its anywhere where an object could orbit?
wait
Worked out some on the first integral
Wait this can be simplified again
Lmfao why am I making this so hard for myself sometimes
Its literally basics
Much better
And now my input prompt
$\displaystyle = -2\pi G\sigma mR² \qty[\int \frac{s(r²+s²-R²)}{2r²Rs³}ds]^{s_2}_{s_1}$
$\displaystyle = -2\pi G\sigma mR² \qty[\int \frac{r²+s²-R²}{2r²Rs²}ds]^{s_2}_{s_1}$
$\displaystyle \qty[\int \frac{r²+s²-R²}{2r²Rs²}ds]^{s_2}_{s_1} = \qty[\int \frac{r²}{2r²Rs²}+ \frac{s²}{2r²Rs²} - \frac{R²}{2r²Rs²}ds]^{s_2}_{s_1}$
=
$\qty[\int \frac{1}{2Rs²}+ \frac{1}{2r²R} - \frac{R}{2r²s²}ds]^{s_2}_{s_1}$
$\qty[\int \frac{r²+s²-R²}{2r²Rs²}ds]^{s_2}_{s_1} = \qty[\int \frac{r²}{2r²Rs²}+ \frac{s²}{2r²Rs²} - \frac{R²}{2r²Rs²}ds]^{s_2}_{s_1}$
=
$\frac{1}{2R} \int_{s_1}^{s_2} \frac{1}{s²} ds + \int_{s_1}^{s_2} \frac{1}{2r²R} ds - \frac{R}{2r²} \int_{s_1}^{s_2} \frac{1}{s²}ds$
=
$-\frac{1}{2(s_2 - s_1) R} + \frac{s_2 - s_1}{2r²R} + \frac{R}{(s_2 - s_1) r²}$
=
$-\frac{1}{2(\sum_{n=0}^{2}- \Delta R) R} + \frac{\sum_{n=0}^{2} - \Delta R}{2r²R} + \frac{R}{(\sum_{n=0}^{2} - \Delta R) r²}$
$\Rightarrow -\frac{1}{4R²} + \frac{1}{r²} \cdot\frac{2}{2} + \frac{1}{2r²}$
$\Rightarrow 2\pi G\sigma mR² \qty[\frac{3}{2r²} -\frac{1}{4R²} ]$
Where $s_1 = r-R \approx \Delta R$ and $s_2 = r+R \approx \sum_{n=0}^{2} r_n$ and $r_2 = R$```
I'm watching the livestream rn
「科科報報」特別馬拉松直播!室溫超導體復現實驗實況直播,我們現在來到台大凝態研究中心王立民教授的實驗室,與您分享室溫超導體的製備實驗過程。更多資料:https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008特別感謝:台大物理 王立民教授特別感謝:SMC台灣科技媒體中心https://smctw.tw/162...
Ah yes abt LK-99
In the 1930s, Oppenheimer was a theoretical physicist interested in neutrons which led him to be the first to mathematically predict the existence of black holes. So how did an expert in theory end up leading the experimental development of the atomic bomb during WWII?
Chadwick (1932; discovery of neutron report) - https://www.nature.com/ar...
Lmao text glitch
Oppenheimer went learning about if stuff 10,000,000,000x the power of nukes exist to making a nuke himself
(Not really himself)
He was a theoretical physicist specialised into qauntum mechaniscs. Specifically the Neutron
He theorised about what happens during supernovae and what happens to the core of the star after
He was the first to find Neutron Stars as a solution to the Einstein Field Equations
The atom bomb or thermonuclear bomb as it should be called came way later
It was not even in his interests field
In fact. The thermonuclear bomb frightened him
Apparently, it ended in a failure once again
kekw
But you know it's more interesting
CMTC is now projecting that there could be new model yet to be framed
The mode of levitaton is also not ferromagnetic
it's been expected that levitation was at least due to strong diamagnetism for a while
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLWb5QBVQMc
Great video ngl although I am defo a lot more into astrophys than this guy xD
Realizing that the GPA complaint sounds super insufferable, but it legit robbed me of 30 grand lmao.
Check out my other socials!
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/storytime_with_jeff/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/JeffStorytime
Discord: https://discord.gg/dKpj5qm
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/storytimewithjeff
The Homie Stemo's Spotify (he m...
About feedback and being tricked by their prof
a friend compiled a chart of all bodies known or highly suspected of hosting liquid water
all bodies are too scale and as much to true color as she could have em
venus technically has liquid water too if you count a pitifully small volume contained in high-altitude cloud droplets which are "only" 30% sulfuric acid
HCl (aq) still counts as having H2O(l)
HS (aq) counts too
as long as it is soluted in water
No Europa that is interesting
there is europa
the majority of venus's clouds are sulfuric acid
overwhelmingly
the full list of bodies are:
earth
mars
ceres
europa | ganymede | callisto
enceladus | dione | titan
miranda | ariel | titania | oberon
triton
pluto
Maybe we could mine those clouds for replete and cheap sources of sulfuric acid
sulfur on earth which can be used to produce sulfuric acid isn't terribly uncommon nor expensive
mining from space is expontentially more expensive than just from Earth
Most water soluable things here are easy to get
Esp HS-
And H2S too
Yeah, I understand that.
Kind of would be funny if there is some weird life on Venus that revolves around sulfuric acid
There is a big reason why earth as C-based life actually
C is the most stable and most functional element for life
Si is by far not as stable and sulfur-based defo not too
rings of chiron confirmed via occultation
unlike the rings of several other minor/dwarf planets, chiron's rings appear to be much broader
So ik that a planet’s gravitational dominance region is a teardrop shape area
CHEMESTRY IS BETTER
As a chem major student, chem is amazing but its just as good as physics
it is in-fact pracitcally physics
bio chem also requires physics
thermodynamics and pH and pOH are physics
Without them and you miss out some of the most important parts of biology and chemistry
and please keep talk here serious and on-topic to the chat.
How many small objects in the solar system have rings?
Haumea, Chiron, Chariklo
What else?
Oh look a fourth one
There seems to be some questions over that the ring is not within the roche limit of Quaoar
quaoar has two rings, actually; i am relatively confident that the outer ring is similar in dynamics to saturn's F ring where shepherd moons and collisions maintain a highly disturbed ring
spin-orbit resonances certainly help as well
And the LK99 train never ends, https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04353
The movie Oppenheimer gets the physics pretty much right
They do leave some pretty big gaps though that wouldve mattered a lot...
And not including the Castle Bravo test in the movie was just bullcrap tbh
When you got Richard Feynam, Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Hill, Albert Einstein, President Eisenhowever, and you proceed to not include the Castle Bravo test, come on man
And the fission and fusion things they never really explained it well
In the theater a lot of people were clueless and meanwhile me knew so much abt it that I started doing the math in my head
So we got U-235
Which has to be enriched
U-235 is known to be an isotope of Urane that can go supercritical
Especially when you isolate it
But what you need is high-quality enriched U-235 with exactly the right ratio of (Z/A)^2
If the U-235 isotope is ever so slightly too unstable, the power surge cuts and the fission reaction occurs in an uncontrolled manner and no bomb will detonate.
And theres a few inconsistencies theyve mentioned with QM
@unique dragon they did briefly talk about QFT and the discovery of molecules and their importance but never continued to use it as if it didnt matter for the movie when in actuality the understanding of the workings of molecules is what led physicists to study fission and fusion as much as they did.
They also mentioned D2O and D but never explained what it is and why its important either.
The thing about learning physics is that you become frustratingly pedantic while enjoying popular media, this is a known rule /j
Chadwick (1932; discovery of neutron report) - https://www.nature.com/articles/129312a0
Oppenheimer & Volkoff (1939; maximum mass of a neutron star) - https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/...
Oppenheimer & Snyder (1939; gravitational collapse beyond maximum limit) - https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/...
Tolman (1934; textbook) - https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?i...
Fermi et al. (1934; radioactivity from neutron bombardment) - https://www.jstor.org/stable/2935604?...
Hahn & Strassman (1939; chemistry of nuclear fission)
Meitner & Frisch (1939; physics of nuclear fission) - https://www.nature.com/articles/143239a0
Hawking (1974; black holes in GR) - https://link.springer.com/article/10....
Penrose (1964) - https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1...
Hawking (1971; gravitationally collared objects of low mass) - https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/p...
Rezzolla, Most & Weih (2018; revised TOV limit from LIGO) - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10...
Webster & Murdin (1972; first observational black hole candidate) - https://www.nature.com/articles/235037a0
Nature - A new form of penetrating radiation came to light in 1930, when Bothe and others bombarded beryllium with ?-particles. Although these emissions were attributed initially to an unusual form...
Nature - In the late 1930s, a series of experiments showed that bombarding uranium with neutrons produced several new radioactive elements, which were assumed to have atomic numbers near to that of...
guess the physics concept
Circumference of a Neutron Star 
wrong
Totally different maths for that
and way easier
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tXIoViA_0g
new upload
Go to https://brilliant.org/drbecky to get a 30-day free trial and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual subscription! Everything we know about the Universe suggests that supermassive black holes in the centres of galaxies should merge together, BUT the maths tells us that supermassive black holes will never merge together; instead ...
Geometric value of Sum
No
It is called Hill Sphere
Keep things serious. So not random GIFs.
The region of space around an object where a satellite could orbit indefinitely is called the Hill sphere, roughly defined as where the object's gravitational field is stronger than that exerted by another object outside the sphere.
So like Mars’s moon Phobos isn’t a hill sphere since it’s said to crash into it in like a million years
Or the moon is currently drifting away from us every few centimeters every year
Yes
Those are not in the Hill Sphere ever so slightly
Albeit the moon distancing itself is cosmologically so small that it can be approximated as within the Hill Sphere
they are in the hill sphere
the definition does not take into account tidal effects besides arguably the roche limit (can't have a moon inside a hill sphere if you have no moon) and instabilities exerted by the parent star
self-correction: external influences are not accounted for beyond strength of gravitational pull on a secondary object compared to the strength of the gravitational pull of the primary object
hence, a large region of the hill sphere exists where no stable orbits can be achieved
Ah that makes loads of sense
Ty
yea it's basically an approximation for partitioning regions of space based upon which body's gravitational pull dominates
Fifteen seconds before 5:30 a.m. on Monday, July 16, 1945, J. Robert Oppenhemier and his team of Manhattan Project scientists ushered in the nuclear age. And thankfully, after the Trinity test, the Earth was still there. This [HALF-LIFE HISTORY] is the true story of the day we almost set the world on fire.
00:00 Intro
01:35 "Terrible Possibilit...
@amber nimbus will like what I get to have fun with this fall lol
Oo
Time to make sure I get not an A in this class
Get an X
Hey Alex when you wake up usually?
Fun
why tf can plasma in stars be described as an ideal gas?????
Its an assumption that can be made yes
Yuck
so im gonna have to learn stuff as this for my coming year
curious how itll go ngl
gotta study hard ig
I would too
I’m sure the reconstruction of this mode was fun lol
But this is cool, promising result
Ooo
A few years ago we thought Antares will go before Betelgeuse, as shown in this video: https://youtu.be/uD4izuDMUQA?si=ZkADuDDiOPADGmGe
Support my work on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/melodysheep | Get the soundtrack: https://bit.ly/2HKl9fi | How's it all gonna end? This experience takes us on a journey to the end of time, trillions of years into the future, to discover what the fate of our planet and our universe may ultimately be.
We start in 2019 and travel expone...
such things are still very much theories for most part and a lot based on claims tbf
This video could actually give you a panic attack
Not kidding
This is one of the things @spark ravine
Not very hard
Without the limit its the Riemann Sum approximation of a graph
I'm going to be honest this looks too complex for me, it's probably easy to solve though
Its very easy
It basically means if I integrate 2x I get x² + C
The C term is that small deviation factor you can have as error margin
In physics its very good to know how big that C is
I'm still a bit lost tbh. Maths ain't my strong point
Looking at it deeper , it does seem easy to solve
Visuals and storyline, eh?
Tidal forces in and around the iss accelerates things in seemingly random directions
I never knew this channel was here lol
You learn analysis? That's great
Yeah already had two lectures
What is the link between paper rings and radiofrequency cavities?
In this CERN-Solvay Education video, we showcase a DIY activity which will help us understand the concept of resonance.
At CERN, we accelerate protons using strong electric fields, applied in accelerator components called radiofrequency cavities. But to make those fields even s...
Go to https://brilliant.org/drbecky to get a 30-day free trial and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual subscription! This summer, I published two research papers with my collaborators about the growth of supermassive black holes. One of those research papers was about what processes cause SMBHs to spin at their maximum rates, and ...
WOAH
PAPERS FROM BECKY
LES GO
got to see some telescopes at uni's observatory heehoo
thicc mfers
anyways uhhhh new paper to throw into the eternal bonfire that is the debate over the history of saturn's satellites and their evolution https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03861
Are Saturn's regular satellites young or old? And how old are Enceladus'
cratered plains? To answer these questions we computed model surface ages of
the most heavily cratered terrains on Saturn's regular icy satellites using new
high-resolution outer Solar System evolution simulations, and coupled with
improved estimates of the trans-Neptunian ...
Yo you wanna see some photos of the oldest academic observatory in the world?
I can go there next week if you want
Its part of my faculty
yeha shore
Some simple calc 2 for you @amber nimbus
That would seriously be considered Analysis 1 over here
swap that root for a fraction over a root with a minus sign and you got me "squared"
I mean it's still solvable regardless with some good old integration by parts
Ofc the best thing about integrals is adding basic +1 can destroy your sanity
@idle scroll you said you liked physics
what do you like abt it specifically
(I love it hence I chose the major, besides math)
Hard to say what exactly, Im generally pretty interested in physics. I had the advanced physics class or however you wanna call it in school for a reason. Just super interesting and fascinating stuff.
Learning how the world and the universe works
and also I like it because a lot of people hate physics bc its so complex
Wut
Hmm
in Analysis 2 we get multiple integrals and loop integrals and so
that is semester 2 this year
so in just over half a year
All of that would be basically Calculus 1 & 2 here
Calculus is what we do yes
but we call it by the mathematical name "Analysis"
as it is more or less pure math lectures than physics math
What book do you use
I only know PMA Rudin for analysis
An example of an analysis book chapter 1 (it's Korean though)
Ordered set & completeness there
Calculus: A complete Course. tenth edition
Oh I would consider it Calculus in that case. What aspects are different for Analysis classes from Calculus classes at your university?
University is the more right term as its not a school
Aight
school is something way different
we are doing complex numbers rn
working with z and w and Euler's Formula
and arguments and conjugates and complex conjugates
and Moivre's formula
and a lot more lol
including the proofs for e^ipi + 1 = 0
The thing is in Korean, the word 학교(school) is included in the word university (대학교)
yeah in Latin its very different
I can see that just an explanation why I said school lol
We dont have to learn the Latin but if we want we can
same for the Greek
its even recommended if you rlly wanna be an ideal student at physics
Same for us there's Latin, but I don't think we have greek tho
Yeah its pretty important for our history too 🥴
the language you are speaking rn has relations to Latin and Old Greek
I have learned them in high school. I think they would appear in basic math of physics or sth like that course for physics major in our uni
"Etymology. From both the Medieval Latin acadēmicus and the French académique, from Latin academia, from Ancient Greek ἀκαδημικός (akadēmikós), from Ἀκαδημία (Akadēmía) or Ἀκαδήμεια (Akadḗmeia), the name of the place where Plato taught; compare academy."
this is where our University is based upon. These principles
hence its mandatory to learn about the history lol
Good
Im in a 448 years old Uni lol
XD
oldest uni of my country and one of the oldest in the world
the US didnt even exist back then probably wasnt even discovered by Columbus
Zzzzzzzzzzzzz ^^^^^
That was meant as a laugh
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
Is basically what we do here
Same letter
Anyways why don't you search on the real analysis on the internet
It is sn interesting pure math
Real Analysis pls no
Dont want to proof why the math proof and definitions we use are true
i need to learn physic
I have seen a video on yt stating that the sun was once hotter and bluer lol
beginner astrophysics lol
i know astronomy kinda but no astrophys
Thats true but not rlly in actually blue
Its always been a blackbody radiator
even astrophysics itself is a pretty broad field
broad within certain borders
speaking as an astrophysics major student
,,, i am an astrophys student as well
oof lol, we learned it as in its still a very specific field within the certain borders
Which uni u going?
CU boulder
ah Boulder uni
it's an alright uni
Has a great experimental physics department
have heard many great stories abt it lol
(I do a double major)
Curious on tomorrow's astrophys lecture fr
But still I keep looking forward to the analysis lectures each time lmfao
something abt the math lectures rlly grabs my attention in a good way
so much so that I am considering to take extra math courses later on
lectures here are decently interesting, altho they capped my first term at 16 credits which sucks
oh I have to get 45EC/60EC this year to go to year 2
there's also like
a billion other furries
someone's been sticking stickers of their fursona on pretty much every smooth surface on campus
but i digress
my largest gripe is that it's very hard to accelerate oneself on the astrophys track so i kinda have to wait to complete two terms of a basic astronomy course before i can take more upper-division astrophys courses :/
oof
meanwhile here there are a lot of girls for such an exact science
rlly nearing the 60/40 mark rn with M/F total ratio
the M/F ratio in the group I always hang around with is like 1/3 tho
Im the only guy
🥴
my friend group is almost entirely more queer furries which isn't a surprise
it's really funny seeing someone who owns a fursuit also pursue undergrad research
not exactly commonplace, but there's no difference
like
isnt there that doctor with like 1991034832 tattoos
lol
thats not rlly how it works
Humans will be humans
yeah
people will be people. its that easy
what i mean
xD
ykw fuck it nvm
Also astronomy is more of the laws of the planetary orbits and stars moving and so
astrophysics is describing the universe with the tools of physics
cosmology is a part of that field
but anywho what are some resources to start learning astrophys like beginner beginner
hmmm
(im in ap physics 1 so i dont know a bunch of phys yet)
I recommend books a lot
thats a hard one as you rlly need to search
but "Black Holes and why everything you know about them is wrong" is a good start
great book written by Dr. Smethurst
very friendly for newbies
i mean, the foremost thing is to ensure you have a good basic physics foundation, so if you haven't taken any physics courses you should do so
ahem math is imo more important
ig i have some time
if you arent well-versed in math the physics will be hard
im only in calc AB
as physics is quite literally math
i mean maths and phys kinda go hand-in-hand
yeah
just not as abstract as the field of mathematica
ah, you're still in high school?
and also AB calc is a decent start
like here is an image of one of our lectures
this is at the very start
first 10 minutes
math everywhere you look
and loads of algebra
I dunno about murican math lol
damn
All I know is that I have to master integrals, derivatives, limits, continuity, singularities, polynomials, goniometry, trigonometry, roots, differential equations
AB calc covers most basic calc stuff. derivatives, integrals and the fundamentals of them; some forays into applications of derivatives and integrals, and uhh some more stuff but it's been like two years since i took it
Like its not an extreme amount as its rather basic
we didnt have to learn like the definitions and how to proof them with lemmas
Like this is a homework Q
every single part here needs math
honestly i want to do a double major as well with chem and something physics
chem and phys are a tougher combi than astrophys and phys
im doing phys + astrophys
ah
the real tough double is math + phys tho
like i only have a year and a half till college i need to decide something i needs to major in
wouldn't you be able to share classes between the majors
americans sometimes use college and university interchangably because uhh america
yeah
when we look at a lot of colleges from a perspective via my country we look at a lot of them like applied sciences
which we call colleges here
like harvard themselves calls themselves harvard college soetimes
and it does make sense with what is being taught generally
here when a higher ed is considered a college its usually a liberal arts college
But like I come from an extremely prestigious country with very prestigious unis so I might be a bit skewed in view
remember that like only 10% of people on average can make it to university
each year
of schoolgoers
so yeah its really no surprises that University here is a very very different concept
its the highest attainable degree of education there is
but in the end you're learning the same things
uhm actually I recently discovered we are learning a lot of stuff thats reserved for like way late for most degrees in the US
at the end of the day the physics remain the same
but the way its taught is different
def
also don't pressure yourself too hard over this; you'll have time to settle and change
i'm probably unique in that i already know almost precisely what i want to do
the pace is about a chapter each 2 lectures max here
damn how many chapters are there
meanwhile me who knew what he wanted to do but is now stuck in choices
a crap ton
we gotta take 3 years to be able to do only half of the book
problem is that i go to a super competitive school like everyone's aiming for ivies
and like everyone's decided on what they want to do
well uni is that + 10000x more
relaying from a friend i know who goes to yale: ivies are overrated
and btw yeah take your time
I wasnt top of the class in school yet here I am now like being top of the lab 🥴
thankfully i understood that last year
i'll be happy going to my state school (UC Davis or UCSD)
ivy schools certainly offer a very strong curriculum and plenty of research opportunities, yes, but most of them have horridly toxic academic environments
or if im lucky UCLA
here im in this pic
he is explaining a concept I didnt rlly understnad cuz symmetries
ig the prestige comes from connections but the difference that makes is kinda small compared to a state schoo
and trust me when i say that -- at least from my own experience -- roughly half of the people who enter uni first year will probably change majors and/or minors later on
in my culture its frowned upon to do so because its considered wasting money for some reaosn
50-60% here too
ive seen people already quit after 2 lectures
and today already even more people lost it
alex are u in class rn 💀
i mean yeah, but would you rather potentially risk a relatively small increase in tuition or jump in early into something you potentially hate
ignore the girl to my right btw
yeah
No I am not its fucking 23:47
oh ok
I do start again tmrw at 09:00 tho
and end at 17:00 officially
no wait
13:15 I think
short day
how many classes?
well kinda only got 1 lecture tmrw and 1 seminar
so I got plenty of time to work out my data sets for statistics
i start around 9 as well
cuz yeah lab work = plenty data
usually 3 classes per day between 9 and 15:00
3 god damn
american university generally permits a lot more free time
yeah again, they limited me to 16 credits this term
my hs has 8 classes (starts at 825 ends at 1600)
last year my school was from 730 to 1600 (zero period was the worst mistake of my life)
i also intentionally kinda crammed everything between 9 and 15 because i mentally die by evening
Lol
it looks like you are extracting the last remaining life force from your professor
reeeee
Also the evolutionary models don’t show the sun having average surface temp greater than 6000K in the past
Bluer just means more high energy than it used to be
Even 100K more is a lot
Also had a lecture abt tides and all today
I remember how Universe Sandbox Legacy would make newly converted stars’ temps 6751 or 6571 kelvins, maybe wunna those is the temp at which blackbody radiation appears most perfectly white to us
Wikipedia says that according to computer models, stars with masses of .14 solar masses will produce the hottest surface temps for a blue dwarfs, approx. 8600 K
Does the article use a lot of math?
if not then its not that reliable and often based on some claims
but if it is using a lot of math its very reliable and probably written by a professional
must checks wikipedia source\
lol
i mean there are scientists in this so…
from my understanding former red dwarf stars will have their record high-temp attempts botched by either low energy output or too much expansion, depending on mass and metallicity
source isnt the way to check
how its build up is
Build up?
Masses between 0.06 and 0.25 suns were simulated, it says
whats the article structure
cmon its not hard
Is it a very much mathematical and jargon article or is it general public
lecture moment
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_dwarf_(red-dwarf_stage)
general public maybe?
or maybe not depends on definition rly
A blue dwarf is a predicted class of star that develops from a red dwarf after it has exhausted much of its hydrogen fuel supply. Because red dwarfs fuse their hydrogen slowly and are fully convective (allowing their entire hydrogen supply to be fused, instead of merely that in the core), they are predicted to have lifespans of trillions of year...
this is a research proposal
not a full fledged article
just had to read through a few words and look at the structure and its clear to me its all abt a hypothesis
these references are very obvious
Uni casually teaching students how to do proper research lol
are predicted to increase their radiative rate by increasing their surface temperatures and becoming "bluer".
are **__predicted to __**increase their radiative rate by increasing their surface temperatures and becoming "bluer".
thats a hypothesis
They don’t exist, yep
Non-confirmed 🙂
are believed to eventually completely exhaust their store of hydrogen fuel
See what I am doing here?
marking what is important to understand the research prop
Ohh
it takes time to learn this though
Fluid sims, no more so far
Tidal evolution outwards has equilibrium eventually, with variable properties, scenarios, and outcomes
What about inwards?
as I said im getting lectures on it next week
okie dokie
urghhh trying to find examples of counterrotating circumstellar discs
if you mean via orbital decay, the equilibrium is the moon gets murdered violently ✨
phobos, triton, and a handful of other close-in giant planet moons are currently undergoing this process
phobos in particular is of interest, as consensus seems to be growing towards current phobos not being the "original" phobos -- i.e., phobos has been sheared into a ring and reaccreted in the past, perhaps multiple times
Which shortens faster, primary’s rotational period or the moon’s orbital period
uhh i'm pretty sure it's a decent "it depends"
With op mass primaries it’s hopeless for the orbiter, lessening op-ness increases hope
Yes very much so
so far as i can tell all moons currently undergoing orbital decay via tides are far from massive enough to save themselves
Yep
one could probably run some rough calculations to figure out the range of conditions where orbital decay would be able to halt by that process but i'd give a throwaway guess that such points would require either a small difference between the primary's initial rotational period and the secondary's initial orbital period and/or a mass ratio approaching that of binary planets or an extraordinarily large mass ratio
Hmm if they don’t rotate chaotically then asteroid moons, being already tidally locked (a stability in itself), would only migrate inwards by speeding up their planet, so there would be a mass that ensures quickest death I guess
uhhh i mean, there's also a point where an object becomes small to where its tidal effects upon the primary are minor, therefore also slowing its tidal deceleration
afaik the reason why phobos's orbital decay is so prominent is both due to phobos being quite close to mars, and the mass ratio between phobos and mars being quite a bit closer compared to that of small giant planet regular satellites and the parent giant planet
i'd tentatively throw out that phobos doesn't even need to generate its own tidal bulges, as the gargantuan mass of the tharsis plateau works as well
i'll have to check the last statement but i'm decently confident that tharsis is a major contributor to the tidal effects on phobos and deimos

On 14 September 2023, CERN Accelerator School celebrated 40 years of bringing together #accelerator communities and passing on the knowledge from distinguished authorities in their fields to future experts. Over the years, thousands of bright accelerator scientists and experts have been trained through the CERN Accelerator School (CAS).
Find o...
🥳
having spent some time working out relativity homework I can now confidently say I did indeed pick the right degree 🙂
like fr this shit is fun
Remarkable
Have you learned Hamiltonian & Lagrangian? (My spelling might be wrong) I was scared when I heard them when doing mechanics (and still think we should able to solve them without those too)
Not yet at uni
Getting that with classical mech in sem 2
Aight
The order y’all do ur stuff in is weird
Or mine is weird idk
My analysis class this semester isn’t using rudin as it’s more of an intro to analysis class, the more rigorous analysis class is a 4th year class
We get the math first and the introduction to the major concepts
In sem 2 we get physics for real
I mean we do the same but you have to wait 2 full years fsr
it’s kinda annoying ngl
Oof
Yeah the pace here is super high esp as Leiden wants to keep its top 80 position
Currently ranked #77 in the world with physics and astrophysics
My school is weird, like the top 10/20% of kids are cracked here
And then it’s just bums kinda
like every year we send mf’s to like MIT and schools that caliber
But it’s like 4/5 kids go to grad school per class
outta like 30/40 kids
I guess that’s the typical state school thing
Mars
-Phobos
Jupiter
-Metis
-Adrastea
Saturn
-moonlets
Uranus
-multiple moons
Neptune
-everything closer than Hippocamp
-Triton
I see. Which major are you taking?
I was referring to a 2nd year subject (which is a should-take-course), yeah. Real analysis is 4th year subject here, too.
NASA’s #ParkerSolarProbe has now become the first spacecraft ever to fly through a powerful solar explosion near the Sun. https://jhuapl.link/s5l
@NASASun @NASASolarSystem
BANG
YEAH BOI
ly2 parker 🥰
Physics/Math dual degree
In my 3rd year right now
Same thing or?
maths/phys dual majors respect 🫡
I am stat major and possibly Computer science or math double major
https://youtu.be/qrKtJ4DW2JA?si=DY86_3NiytUNoUtX
@amber nimbus
Astronomers have discovered something weird happening on Neptune. Nearly all the clouds that decorate its apparent blue atmosphere have disappeared, leaving the far-flung world almost devoid of clouds. Unlike the calm blue sky on Earth, Neptune's sky is constantly changing and full of action. It has some of the fastest winds in our solar system,...
Apparently Neptune's cloud cover is influenced by the Sun's Ultraviolet radiation
Because explained in the video,
If lower ultraviolet radiation- CH⁴ or Methane doesn't get triggered that much and hence cloud formation in Neptune is low or sometime cloud-free in the mid-level latitudes like in 2020, but during high Solar Turbulence or High Solar Activity Ultraviolet ray triggers Methane to cause cloud formation
UV + Methane = Cloud Formation w/ infrarease in brightness
Hm
Earth's is too lol
Its called radiative feedback
Just got 4 vectors. Gravitational waves and LIGO and stuff
this is kinda expected; UV is extremely important in atmospheric haze formation and upper atmospheric dynamics overall. higher UV insolation is one contributor to why uranus looks slightly lighter in color and is hazier overall compared to neptune
it also meaned that prior to oxygenation, earth probably resembled something akin to titan, its atmosphere smothered in dense organic haze
Are those Lorentz transformation explanations? I'd like to see if you have any notes on this, mostly out of pure, unadulterated intrest
I'd like some context
Thats Minkowksi space-time diagrams
Resulting from the Lorentz factor
Lecture analysis 1, polynomials
part of calculus
its something we gotta master
That looks a lot more complex than I expected for polynomials.
Presumably using reference frames
I am guessing Liouville's theorem is upcoming, and with that the proof of FTA
Intertial Frames yes
Nah thats like for much later
Ah
That’s dope, I’m taking a GR class next semester
neat
yeah I wanna take the math courses for it extra tbh
and Relativistic Electrodynamics I want to take as well
In most E/M classes they do that
,,, i am pleasantly surprised that i remember how to integrate by parts after a solid 3 months of never having to think aboutit
I havent like done it in a year+
Loop integrals is a different story
Same for double, triple and even quadruple integrals
Thats neat
i hate it just as much as i did before :)
Integrals are my favorite
Its the oldest uni observatory in the world in fact
These telescopes were used to track Apollo
ours is just holed up in a hill behind some trees and a small garden
it might be intentional to keep away trespassers or sumn
Eyes of TCs rotate like “rigid” objects from what I see in satellite footage
what do you mean exactly
the skies are clear as there is an anticyclone present over the top of the eye as that is what causes it to clear in the first place
Ignoring mini cyclones in the eye’s LLC, it spins like a solid disk in visible imagery
The anticyclone has slow moving sinking air
that is what you see in this V-shape in the sondes in the eye
that is why it looks like its not moving but the eyes do in-fact rotate pretty darn fast
How can you calculate it? Angular Velocity for a period of wrapping of two VHTs around the eyewall
that is also what keeps the eye stable
when you are under a ridge air does not seem to move either right?
It is because the air is pretty darn "compressed"
there is more air than elsewhere in the cyclone in the eye
That’s why as you travel inwards, winds slow relative to the moving center once you cross the ring of greatest wind (for perfect-eye storms)
read what I just said again
it all comes down to sinking air
rising air = turbulent flow
sinking air = laminar flow
the "rotation" of the eye is the same as that of the eyewall
each eye also has a small very small trochoidal wobble as it propagates
which is normal as it is a standing wave of sorts if you rlly look at it physically speaking
Bicycle wheel logic, I mean
But what if we were to ignore imperfections in the airflow?
That is what I just did
except turbulence is not an imperfection in the airflow
its a perfectly normal occurance and is even essential to even describing a fluid
a whirlpool is not laminar flow is it
TCs are literally like whirlpools in the atmosphere
Oof I didn’t know the terms turbulent and laminar
It's the reason that the exact form of a solution for a navier stokes equation, where it be solved, would earn the solver 1mil
And whirlpools have different gradients than orbital systems right
NS is a 3rd order PDE
no way in hell someone is ever gonna solve it
xD
We can only approximate it
Orbital systems have nothing to do with TCs
I mean the math
There is a reason why all weather models are using fluid mechanics ;-;
They'll probably prove something general about differential operators
Ah
the math for TCs is fluid mechanics
see this equation @honest crypt
this one was used to describe the turbulent heat fluxes in Hurricane Irma
the bold letters are vectors
with each 3 dimensional components
I could do the linear algebra but I dont wanna matrices today but I have to cuz study
I don’t know the math rip, but I can get concepts
What do all of the variables represent
you can see the difference in efficient used heat fluxes
Oh god here we go again
theyre parameters
not variables
parameters and vectors
some with scalars some without
hm let me grab my school research paper on it
oh fuck
this is gonna be a long time to explain
x_h is the horizontal coordinate vector
z is the vertical
basically just the x,y,,z components of a model
f is coriolis parameter
v is molecular viscosity
rho naught is reference density
instantentious horizontal winds are u_h and vertical with w
they originate from the reynolds average
and got a deviation of u', w'
P is the reynolds averaged pressure
and then the other is the average of the u and w compotents for the averaged vertical turbulent momentum flux
@vernal root
I can understand tcs as when water goes down a drain, massive rising of air causes angular momentum conservation logic
there
Ah
angular momentum means conservation of impuls means conservation of energy in a rotated frame
meaning all laws of physics should be preserved whenever you rotate your reference frame
so if momentum p = constant
but angular momentum should be a function of angle and ofc radius
so M = -fr^2 /2 + vR
include m for mass if you want but can be ignored
Then again, if you look at it long enough, so does Fermat's last theorem. But I see your point
Q. you majoring yet in any exact science
Very likely doing chemistry and math. Chemistry because I have worked with a lot of compounds before (don't ask the details), and Math as I know too much of it not to be my major.
chem is a lot more than just working with compounds
Yeah, I'm aware
and mathematics, well it either suits you or it doesnt
im not that big of a fan of it but I still enjoy it
applied however its epic as you see
It's just that a lot of chemists started out with chem sets.
yeah a lot did before it was a proper degree in unis
nowadays it involves a lot of math too
And I have grown fond of them, and know a thing or two about how they work
Doesn't everything
the tech is important but the theory is also just as important
an experiment is only as good as the man who conduct it
Yeah, and that's what Im hoping to learn in Chem, how to see which reactions are favored over the other and what's realistic.
I understand that.
wth
damn
I mightve made some mistakes as im pretty new to this and got a lot of practice to do
whats that goofy symbol
the one that has an n and then like a stick with wings
The psi?
this chat scares me
how abt this
also ffs I couldve solved it with x^2 - 5
😭
wait no x^2 + 5 is better
cuz +15
then id need to rewrite with another x^2 - 3 term
then it should be solvable
u a programmer as well?
I write in LaTex and I got programming in Python as lectures
its a requirement for my degree
I prefer python
currently doing an AI project
Is that german
-5 = -1(5) meaning its i^2 (5) and is thus a complex solution
its Dutch
and 1-sqrt(2) is smaller than 0
hence it can also be factored out with a i^2 factor
hence its also a complex solution
lemme write u a simple algebra equation
solve using elimination:
5x-6y=8
3x-12y=10
u kidding me thats so easy lol
literally multiply top by two and add the bottom to it
Thats why I said simple
its not that hard
squeeze theoremmmm
this one is easy
just use composites
g(x) is a composite of g o h o i and maybe another o j
then derivatives is just chain rule
and yeah it should be continuus over R
well actually
for any x < 0 and x > 0
wait
let me see
computing in my head rn
yeahhh so thats a cos of yeah..
hm
so -1 =< cos(x) =< 1
the sqrt there can never be equal to -1 nor 1
well never be greater than*
if its equal its at its limit
so x = 0 gives sqrt(0+1) = sqrt 1 = 1
thus cos(1) = 0
or 2 pi
for -1 it gets more complex
