#Moderation Suggestions
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
Please
i have a long explanation to give i guess
I’m all ears
here we go gimmie a sec
It all started in October. The server started falling to pieces, some mods were abusing power, some were acting with malpractice, and the whole server needed reforms, including the moderation team
this was when we realized everything was colossally out of date
as the days progress in ealry october, a forum was opened to the public to help with moderation suggestions; a place where the server could make their voices known/heard.
that day was october 8th.
many users suggested many forms of change, but the most influential suggestion was making a universal motion, one that would be posted here, in #announcements that would determine Nathan's ability to continue working with the mods
#announcements message
here was the referendum in question.
posted on october 9th
After the 24 hour vote period, the motion was unanimously in favor of nathan stepping down form moderation duties, so thats what he did
later that day, the board of directors began an impromptu motion to thwart the result of the public server motion
Let's do another referendum
this exasperated the conditions in the server
We just need a complete overhaul of everything
leading to one of the worst break outs of fighting in our history
both in public and internal
i took a month long break from mod duties.
q
Yeah
Moderation issues that you won’t understand
dw abt it
ANYWAYS
after the events of 10/9 everything entered a quiet period
Look up if you really wanna know, let Adler speak
then i returned.
thats when shit hit the fan
i returned and the first thing i wanted to do was fix this server
so begin the periods of meetings, and long discussions and conversations
that ultimately lead to the creation of "Project Odyssey"
a complete and utter server reform
everything was going to change
the channel structure
the roles
the rules
the internal protocols
(the role icons are the only thing that remains of that btw)
the mod team back then fully backed it
it was motioned, and approved
and work on odyssey began
things finally started to look good for the publc server
then... things took a dark, dark turn
disagreements began sprouting left and right
Tim, was driven out of the public server (for good reason)
there was a mass mod vote that lead to the instatement of the admin team
8 people held the role at one point
the one thing i did that stayed lol
What account was Tim again
and then it was revealed that we were going to start dismissing moderators
Moderators who were inactive
moderators who were biased
moderators who were old fashioned
Gabriel stop carrot smacking everyone
were all going to be dismessed
Can you guy please stop talking until Adler is done. I mean seriously just let them say everything they need to say without butting your heads in.
Thank you
Um thank you but he literally asked me to add things in lmfao
that was a good 60% of the team, including some of the admins
tis true
anyways
this was when ethan motioned a complete halt and reversal of the project
mods who were inactive and hadnt even LOOKED in the mod server in weeks
began to uproar
the team that was once in favor of all these changes began to revolt, and this was after me and rev worked our ASSES off fixing these issues
I made a collection of people's last moderation actions back in February and probably over 70% of the team had their last action prior to Queen Elizabeth II dying
mods started to abuse their power to ensure they wouldnt get removed
To put it in perspective
nathan accused me of harassing the public server by enforcing all these changes under their noses
bro actually quit
the board of directors caught wind of the project and tried to stop it, as they "didnt give their consent"
Y'all unless your adler or rev, please refrain from asking questions until they finish.
so we merged the mod chat and board chat to remove the discrepancies between the two teams
Any mods who were active back then have quit now with the exception of Miami
little did i know this would make things SO MUCH WORSE
fights broke out every day,
any progress that was made was quickly overturned
Yeah it was a terrible idea and just solidified the fact that the board should not, ever, have anything to do with moderation
the server that me and rev spent Literally DAYS ON END nonstop trying to fix was getting torn apart because some people didnt want to lose their green name color
weeks even
this went on for months
until my ex happened
my personal life went into the shit hole
constand court dates
constant harassment from him
he stole my families money
(Which the team did absolutely nothing about, by the way)
he physically assulted people
including me
made constant threats
his mother and brother joined THIS SERVER
and the mod team didnt care, and let them continue to degrade my mental health here further
Hang on I wnet away for a minute sorry to interrupt but who was this
and then Asher himself joined the server.... and was allowed to remain in it, for hours
causing extensive damage and derailing chats
and the team blamed me for it
"you could have banned him"
"you could have taken action"
"you let him in here"
it got too much for me to handle
refrain from speaking again except if you're Adler or Rev.
and the constant fighting, abuse at home, and internal raging drove me over the edge
i spiraled
hard
everything i worked for fell apart, just like my personal life
and on january 5th 2023
i cracked
shattered
and i went over the edge
i started removing channels
mass banning people who didnt deserve it
removing roles
i was going to leave anyways so why did it matter?
Is that what the team told you you did?
yes
That's... not true
All that happened was some of the mods were banned
There was no evidence of any roles or channels being deleted
...
well that changes things
i get what i did was incredibly wrong
i understand that i betrayed the team
All the mods in the mod server were banned except for me, and some of them were banned here but not all
and i know you cant trust me anymore
all that happened following that was i made an incredible amount of enemies
after i left
I'm gonna be entirely honest I was pretty pissed for a good while, after you left the reputation of Odyssey and it's original creator (which unfortunately was me) went down the drain and the connection any changes had to the team up top was completely broken, allowing them to simply undo anything I did
after i left this was the narritive that the mod team spread about me. which wasnt true. at all
and @indigo stone im incredibly disgusted
Can confirm!
oh piss off,
you don't need to start a commission
😭
C'mon now
huh
just let it slidde
(Cue the clear lack of attempting to understand by David)
it happened months ago
I took on the role of borderline insanity, at least from what I've been told by people here after Adler left and a lot of people were banned, some of which were relatively notable here. Cora, Kwood and Lysander were some I can name off the top of my head
but you cant ignore the faults of the mod team in this situation either
I swear I wonder what would've happened had I not been demoted and didn't leave bc Adler would've probably gave the reigns to me and let him sort everything out while any problems that arose would be promptly dealt with
No, you're right, the mods do have things own up to.
@wicked ore thats the story
Granted Nathan trying to profit off the deaths of thousands from a heat wave was just something I couldn't participate as a mod in, especially with how much persuading it took from everyone before any consideration was made to deal with it
huh?!
the fact that nathan accused ME of harassing the public is just insane
before i nuked the server
Was this during the European Heatwaves?
yes
ahh.
Glad I was on vacation during that and had no part in modding that event
You got accused of harassing the public, I was allegedly unprofessional and too biased (despite very much making sure ban motions for those I disliked were handled by others)
Wasn't it the merch event.
It was said removing me would fix everything. It did not.
i digress
The only way to get shit done nowadays is to create a # or smth
Well, the mod team seemed to leave a large portion of that story out. I understand now how you feel, and why you did the things that you did.
(a referendum is another option)
True, it doesn’t justify Adler’s actions, doesn’t change that they could’ve responded in a different way, but it explains why.
a referendum wont work, the last one didnt last
But in order for that to happen, the mods gotta be against Nathan, or someone that they have a consensus.
Or atleast, not have confidence in them.
yup
And then one day I proposed an idea, which ended up being my last idea, of changing the tracking channels a bit in order to fix the hellhole that was all those "other system" forums under each basin
It was an idea. That was all. But alas, it ended up gaining a bit of traction from people who were in the mod chat at the time and we winded up discussing it a bit before an admin came in, proposed an opposite idea that we didn't like as much, and so then he...
Well, he motioned the very incomplete idea in the mod server with no information whatsoever, so I had to give context as to not look like an idiot, and he clearly thought it would've failed but... it passed! Woohoo.
So then it was dragged to the public server where it had mixed reactions, but ended up passing there as well. Of course, he put my name all over it in chit chat and so the people who hated it automatically started blaming me for everything, to the point of using FIONA against me, and obviously I retaliated but that was met with even more backlash because I "was a mod and shouldn't be defending myself like that"
Not too long later I left, obviously. I left a nice little message in the mod server and that was it for me
Text wall oops
And it also sounds like a real shame that Project Odyssey went in the dumpster and was set on fire with a bad reputation after you left. Really could’ve made things a lot better by the sounds of it.
There's been too many could have beens
i just wish i had the chance to go back
I wouldn’t
It probably wouldn’t be worth it
i could have done it differently
I had my plans that got thwarted, Adler had his that got thwarted, Rev had his thwarted
The fact an admin riled up the community to harass me and make me leave is just insane
I had my own personal shit going on at this time, which I'm definitely not getting into because it is most certainly against the rules, and so I didn't bother fighting for that long
the fact an admin blamed me for my own abuse is ridiculous
Same one I assume
Hang on as I aksed above who was the person that was abusing you
Oh ok
I have mixed feelings about everything that’s happened with Adler, Xavier, and Rev too. I wasn’t here for any of it when it did go down, but man, sounds like things were not handled properly.
I mean, I wasn't nesecarily involving myself with it. I was mainly trying to calm the crowd down.
I mean most of last year prior to August I was already struggling mentally bc my home situation was shit and F13 was my go-to as something I cared about and wanted to see be better after doing so much and carrying 2021...and then it just got worse bc problems rapidly started firing, I watched many of the people I was close to in the project go in waves bc they were tired of said problems , and my desperation to focus on preventing more of them and actually focus on getting better was just too there. After it was made so I couldn't lead more than 2 teams, I tried to focus on the mod team bc if the CHUB was with little hope, I could figure out the moderation side and try to make the public server better and so I did and even though results were positive, it ended up backfiring bc of the same issues, and eventually it was to the point I gave up entirely.
Yes, I've been somewhat of an ass since because the moderation really has been terrible and very few have realized or taken steps to do anything given nothing worked prior. As much as I'm hated and as much as people hate being bluntly told my opinion, and as much as I hate to admit it, there's still a part of me that cares because of all the work I put in for two years that I want to see things here succeed. I led 4 teams, co-lead another, and was the mod lead at one point so it pains me seeing things like this bc I know what the potential of here is and I hate how badly it's constantly wasted. I've hoped and hoped for things to get better but idk.
I became public enemy 1 when I left and ever since it's felt like none of my contributions I made prior ever meant anything to anyone and that my 2 years there weren't thankful to anyone and its something that I have not liked to live with. Ofc, I would be all glad to make amends with people but at the same time, they have to be willing to actually see my side and understand I'm not trying to be the bad guy at all period.
id say some things were overreacted to in october last year
People said a bunch of stupid stuff october 9th / 10th
Other things like banning the word bust added to the issues
Then there was java who did his attempting to get involved in things by warning people for some jokes the person they were directed at didnt care about (though the way people acted when he left was quite an overreaction in my opinion)
I don't what's worse
Mods knowing very well there's problems and doing nothing about it or being completely blind to them
I feel like it's almost everyone in a position of a power is blind to them these days
lol
and they hate us
I never get a say in shit
none of them will read this chat
which is sad
because i so desperately want them to hear it
My voice is normally ignored and shit.
I mean it'll be read, just ignored or some snarky remarks will be made by Nathan when he wakes up (based on history)
I'm just there for a comedic act ig
That's how it always is
im debating pinging the mods so all of them would look in here but id probably get a mute
Probably
nathan cant see out of his own ass so yea hes gonna come in here with a shit ton of whataboutism
ami is probably the only admin that will actually read whats happening and listen
Ping some of the mods because it needs to get across. Just a couple that might actually care. Like Pogo and maybe Alan or something like tbat
@rough wigeon please read starting here #1083165224376475648 message
i beg of you lol
I was one of the more active moderators in the mod hub and the server, specifically during my return. The mod team has become very inactive, and a former shadow of what I once knew it to be. I don’t hate anyone there, but I wish things were much better.
Yea
You did try with the circumstances handed to you xavier and I see why you care, there's a similar situation on why I care and still follow the politics and moderation of the server, being here for almost 3 years and seeing how uniquely the project is run, thinking that this server was one of the most stable I've been in at one point
To now this
tbh I don't even know why I'm still in the project.
Yeah...so many things that could easily be fixed...just no one actually wants that which makes little sense
I literally run my own project 😭
This is why I listened to you, because I knew this is what was really going on. It can all change, but the mod team has to want it to change.
and someone competent has to lead it
Tbf you only started attempting to listen two weeks ago bc you were too busy arguing with me or trying to debate against every one of my points prior.
It was always nice to come here and see what was going on in natl, chit chat, and talking to the people I've met in this server that I still talk to to this day, now it's way different
its a shell of its former self
not the server it was when i began to moderate it
Exactly
Ping Nathan he just kicked that srb person out for being underage so he’s clearly on now, not that he’d probably care but still worth a try
I still sympathize with you
Honestly 2021 was the year I enjoyed the most when it came to the server, biased maybe because I became a mod then but even then, we had a lot more healthy of a server at the time...think there were 29 mods once I hopped on/trials made it through
nathan has already said he wont talk to xavier or adler im pretty sure
thats the last person i want to ping
As much as I want to listen to the side that doesn't want to care much about the server's issues the circumstances and how it's run still makes me want to pay attention and input what I can from my expirences, I was even mod at one point
he will just continue to blame for everything
There's a pile of whataboutism the size of mount Everest that can be thrown at us and then make our comments get laughed away unfortunately
@grim shadow i feel like I can trust you most of all the mods so even if Adler doesn’t want to ping anyone I’ll ping you, you need to read all the above because something needs to be done and ik your active bc your on rn in the NATL
:/
I mean I've been tired. I'd like to not be constantly criticizing everything trust me, if I could fix it away with a swipe I would
amethyst read starting here #1083165224376475648 message
Adler I’ve seen what you sent and I do definitely have to apologize for how… harsh I suppose I was? I definitely didn’t use my best judgment during the situation
Damn right you didn't
Seems to have been a common theme not to sound bad
Bc this has happened to more than just them
i appreciate it, and im sorry for nuking the mod team
I'm going to stay out of this.....
"I apologize for hurting your feelings."
"Yes, and I apologize for dropping a fat man on your country."
no worries, no matter what we’re going to have our disagreements about what happened so it’s probably best we don’t get too deep into that lol
Wise choice
Of course this didn’t happen
And as much as this may not be entirely the topic of the forum, there's nowhere else it can really be said that fits without it turning into an immature shitshow by many of the immature people we have
💀
Before I go and sleep let me offer a simple starting piece of advice to the mods and admins
Ignore any whataboutism for a period of time. Do not use ANY whataboutist point, perhaps about a month or two. This will allow more people to be more comfortable to address the mod team, with a public server representative being appointed, perhaps Ami/Skye. All grievances about a user that should be punished, sent to them or a forum for all these grievances to be addressed. Not sure about what past offenses to be involved, that can be discussed at a later date
If the mod team was officially lead by Skye I'd probably try to get back in honestly
And if Nathan won’t talk to you or Adler, then it sounds as if he is one of those immature people as well unfortunately
by cracking down it meant add forums and then stop
I mean, my DMs still remain open for those I've had issues with. I don't ignore them, I do respond, hell all the people I was accused of major biases I've still tried to help in the end
Tried to help Chase (sadly that went nowhere)
Tried to help Josh even (that too went nowhere)
Hell I even tried to help Coley even learn to improve after his ban
Josh doesn’t even do it anymore
Like jeez, all it takes is willing to listen half the time and I end up giving extra chances
^
Yeah you were much more lenient on chances than I was lol
welp im off to track doksuri now, ping me if anything notable occurs in here
@obtuse glacier Hello, I read most of the discussion and I would like to apologize to @tender raft and @mental tree of what happened during that period last year. While I was not that active when Project Odyssey was ongoing, I'm sorry that both of you individuals worked really hard and did not achieve the results that would have made a change for the better. I was also going through a very tough time and I cried every week, especially after finding out my aunt got pancreatic cancer and had less than 10% chance of surviving. Both of you guys also went through a very tough time too and I'm really sorry you had to go through those hardships.
i am so sorry about your aunt. and no worries at all pogo
thanks Adler 🥺
how is she now?
she's fighting against it but her health is starting to improve
the chances of surviving just drop off after a year so I'm hoping it's a miracle she can overcome it
thats great to hear! fingers crossed she beats the odds 🤞 and prayers for your family
thank you!
yes
Yeah Adler I would say you put in a lot of work into Odyssey and it’s a shame things didn’t work out in the long run
We kind of had a good thing going lol
probably the most infuriating time of my life
Hope your aunt gets better!!
thx Rev! ❤️
I know I said I’ll be going in my last message but I wanted to add in here that I hope your aunt’s situation gets better and she is able to beat the cancer
thx Rob!
Hope your aunt makes it through pogo
Read through all of this, just wanted to say
-
@grim shadow Hope all keeps going well with aunt
-
Sorry that changes and efforts to improve the server didnt work out from both Rev and Adler. I did hear about some of this already but this chat today is a very strong signal most things need overdoing. I'll bring propositions out to admins and the mod team to see what they think. Even if this doesnt work, I'll keep trying sknce the server can't stay like this forever. Obviously moderation and how well its done can be as a result of a select few people, and as a trial mod im by far not the best mod. I will take any recomendations directly through dms, and I recommend that other mods can be open to recomendations and support too. If a mod in ur opinion isnt doing their job right and chats are not handled the right way, speak to them or an admin to make them aware of the poor moderation. If theres poor moderation, it should be known quickly instead of put in here where admins might take a while to get to. This is obviously for people thay havent tried this already. And im sorry Xavier is getting ignored. Shouldnt be happening
I am always looking in here fairly often, so just acknowledge any suggestions here I do take in to improve how well i do
Im so sorry about your Aunt hope things get better and a miracle happens. Hope your doing OK too ❤️
Poof has been banned and we will actually enforce the rule of no editing official agency advisories. Please keep further suggestions coming to better this server thank you : )
We sure will. But who is wv?
they arent called wv, they were called w.w
they were banned for posting a fake advisory i think initially, which is only warnable by mods
Oh dear
the guy u unbanned 😅
Today?
correction I was mistaken he's still banned.
thought it was another guy working on them rn
he's been unbanned now officially
he was banned for a warnable offense
Why the shit hit me
😭
Lol your overly excited
yes because rev and Xavier are yalls only hope rn
the first correct mod decision in months
I agree
very surprised they would even accept xavier
me too but im damn happy about it
do a participant review please
and like... actually do it well
because currently the role is very redundant, people who are very respectful and knowledgeable are without (such as TCA) and people who know jack shit and/or are immature occupy the status. its not the role it once was, and if maintained like this has lost its relevance and point
Cuurently on the priority list and will soon be worked on 👍
good
Agreed, same for the contributor role
some people are actually trolling with the role
Yeah I've noticed
The contributor role we can’t do much about, that’d be up to the members
oh is it automatically assigned based on activity?
Nah it’s given when someone joins the contributor hub
It’s a separate server where all like videos and graphics and stuff like that is made
ahh
@rough wigeon Are there some people with the contributor role here not in the CHUB? I remember there’s a lot of them not active much
There are also contributor hubs for the regional channels (US, EU, Australia, etc.).
There are some not in the contributor hub but yeah there are regional hubs, which I’m not in really any so I can’t really see who is in what server
There are a lot of contributors though that even are in the contributor hub and don’t do much though
But a like contributor review would be up to the members
Aren’t you in the US CHub? I believe I’ve seen you in the member list there.
Nah I left earlier this month
i think a moderator review is the highest of priority right now
some of the mods are unfit to hold a position there
and a lot of them are not on the same page
Renis
the inconsistency is just upsetting atp
one mod will warn for someting another mod would let slide
not ok
Coming From NATL: @lusty osprey Xavier is effectively a full mod and is just steps away from coming back and restoring order because when he left the system slowly decayed away. Expect more improvements as time goes on and he’s back in the mod server
pasting from what I said in #716215692617187328: i've seen major issues with staff teams having no consistency and it can cause bad drama
so this does need to be fixed imo
I think TCOS needs to actually followed. Does anyone look at NATL and think the shit mods are doing would classify in unclassified?
I just think if there’s nothing really doing anything and there’s no land threat at all then it doesn’t really matter what goes on
yes lol. just because its unclassisfed does not mean you should be able to shitpost 24/7 end of story
yeah.
Now if there’s a major land threat or something I fully agree on moderating the hell out of the channel
This
tbh i side with the mod team on the fact NATL is getting out of control
How did the channel get off topic I forgor 💀
people basically use it as a memes channel at this point
people calling 96L a bust leading to a downward spiral into basically every hour there in august 2022
at this point there could really just be a shitposting natl chat and an actual natl chat and that would literally solve everything but nobody wants to do that
#716215692617187328 has gotten slightly better than last year at least but it's still very bad
So the usual culture of the chat
we Literally already have that. #484125418727800843
Not really the same
Pretty radical idea that I think was tried before, but what if we had forums for the systems 96L, 97L etc under the umbrella of one channel and have those channels be the strict ones
Yeah no lol
Or just a shitposting thread in natl lmao
that failed HARD
yes we need a shitpost NATL lol
No? How about we just stop the shitposting altogether cuz why is it needed at all lmao
because it’s fun lol
ur on discord, you’re going to get shitposting
most people dont want to see it
back to the mod review
Well it's immature and unecessary, find something else to do, or it in #484125418727800843 or #chit-chat
its time for some demotions imo
Oh yeah I think it was because people thought natl would be deleted but I wouldn’t delete the main channel
Waiting until some controversial suggestions get proposed by me once I turn full green
this is discord
And a thread would solve all the problems I truly don’t understand the reluctance
good
There’s still multiple solutions available
- Be more consistent (especially when Xavier is full mod) which is long term
- Open a shitposting thread as a pressure valve for the culture of the chat which is short to medium term
- Full overhaul to #rules again
Probably medium to long term
Yeah the current rules are far more vague and subject to loopholes than they used to be although I've said that numerous times by now
Or just stop the shitposting? Why do we need it. Why cant you just be mature enough to not
If you push too hard you’re going to build up pressure, and then people let it out. You guys need to implement something that can ease the people up. While still looking professional and following rules
Its completely fine when you are modding people doing full on shitposting but whats happening is people do some jokes and go on related conversation from NATL discussions in Unclassified mind you and then get told to stop or be warned
At the same time keep this in mind: There's numerous people who don't want to chat in #716215692617187328 as it is bc of how badly the shitposting is
Kacper you haven’t been here for a while this has been something going on since 2020, plus I mentioned solutions that didn’t involve shitposting
Thats the biggest problem imo, people are being modded for going on tangent convos
So I would not mind driving the shitposters out if that means getting it so the more mature people are more inclined to talk there again
I actively advocate modding full time shitposters btw
Read #1 and #3
I am at least serious when there’s something to be serious about
but coming in strong on people going slightly off-topic on a tangent or just some jokes is a bit too much
Fair tactic, if that’s the route F13 would want to go
Ik lmao, I don't need to be here that long to understand
The ambush of warnings was simply bc the topic when I redirected at first had no reason and had been largely out of hand for a bit. However very few listened and I only warned those who made MULTIPLE disruptions after the fact
well the whole topic started because models showed poor support for 96L causing some members to make jokes which you said to stop
I've been here four years and had it happen once and it was a far better chat to be in but it's regressed so badly in the last year and a bit that it isn't even funny anymore
Ok can someone fill me in on what exactly happened
after that the chat completely derailed
Cuz we had the whole everyone trying to cancel the season yet again
again, I get that you dont like it but its not just your personal chat
Very few listened because of the lack of consistency, carry on how you address situations in natl like how you did today or whenever I was stricter last year and clarify the rules and people will slowly start to listen or leave
The thing is it's always the same people causing it
members were just making some jokes amognst themselves
That's my issue
its because the same people keep the chat active when nothign is going on
there's like only 10-20 people who hand around in #716215692617187328 during unclassified
And hell if yall want to shitpost the ATL so bad and its the same few just make a GC or something and keep it out of here
so you will see them again
And we've said it enough times, if there's nothing to contribute then there's no sense. It's not like we actively want the channel to be 24/7 active
I’m so down for a ATL shitpost GC 😂😂
Like I said, I am fully onboard for kicking out the full-time shitposters
sadly only 10 members can be in a gc
Tropical chatroom moderation makes 0 sense and I will stand by that
Natl is undoubtedly more strict than other chats at far higher codes
but moderating jokes between serious discussions is something I cant agree with
The tcos system is broken and this is the outcome
Yeah I see your point...it's just those full time shitposters have kinda been responsible for helping to keep the jokes at an all-time high and lead to further derailing
I agree with you on that
There are some members who dont contribute at all and only derail
Agreed.If nothing changes in ten minutes. I’m not sure why jokes can’t be made. Especially if we’re talking about invests lol
Unfortunately my attempts prior to me returning to mod duties took forever to have dealt with so that's been another issue
but whats happening is that the contributing members are getting moderating because they were making the same jokes as the derailing shitposters
Eg, yoshii, Alex the supporter, Queens person, xori, roch
Named 6 people and there’s some room to spare but would be pretty funny to see
Maybe just clearer rules would also help. Like examples, and such
I think examples could be helpful. Here’s how this breaks the rules etc
I mean I go off of what I see, and the issue is that so much of the time when I look into the chat and I'm pretty active as is, it's some level of shitposting going on. I said on the last occurrence I'm fine with jokes here and there...as long as entire shitpost discussion isn't made out of it
Seperate #rules so people don’t have to scroll as far it’s dumb but that’s human nature
That shouldn't have merged lol
I think most people would completely agree with that line of moderation if it was correctly enforced
most members hate active shitposting
Trust me I'd love to be the chill mod and be laxed and have fun with the occasional joke in the chat every once in a while
It's just the certain few make that very difficult at times
Ok I'll see what I can do
Honestly the class system between mutes and warnings should be removed
wdym
If someone's actively disrupting chat a warning is not going to stop them, and giving one out is pointless
Should just be able to mute them immediately
^
Honestly not a bad idea
use the manual timeout
Like the 3 warnings = 1 mute thing makes 0 sense lol
when warning
I mean there was one member who was creating duplicate accounts and trolling #716215692617187328 and nothing was done about his main account even though other members posted screenshots
Yeah no I escalate the punishments very fast if they choose to keep not listening lol
who
he is still shitposting and trolling #716215692617187328 everyday
Lol I've been mentioning Pacer in the mod hub for days now
Mute —> warn to make warns more severe and then make warns have mutes for a day depending on the offense.
I lose brain cells every time I'm in NATL reading up on chat a lot of the time.
when you have members like that abusing the chat rules and getting away with it blatantly
of course actual contributors are going to be pissed at being moderated for small jokes
I should note Pacer isn't getting away with it anymore, he got 2 warnings alone yesterday
If I got muted for a day in a server I cared about I wouldn’t repeat the behavior I did
Well, while I’ve been a thorn in your side. I do appreciate your effort to clean things up and wanting to make it more pleasing for people who have more knowledge to come back to NATL.
So why not implement that here?
Maybe pacer would actually go outside then 😭😭
This too
Trust me as much as I have my own beef with here, if I didn't care a lot, I wouldn't be back trying for a 2nd time with the mod side of things
Same, although I sound opposed I am glad that atleast something is being done and you are listening to the other side as well
Most people would just ignore the feedback from the other side
Yeah no I don't go into anything without figuring out what's going on from both sides first
Well, it’s important to hear what people have to say. And I appreciate what he’s doing. Even if we don’t see it the same. He’s not inherently wrong either
True
1 minute to 1 hour mutes for chat disruption and other minor offenses and a notice in DMs
Warn + 1 day mute for more serious repeat offenses
3 1 day mutes in a 3 month period a ban must be discussed (with an everyone ping in the mod server) but not immediately given
This is how you make warnings meaningful
Mods of course should listen to all sides and make appropriate judgements
before making moderation strict, would probably make sense to get it standarized
otherwise people are just going to be mad and pissed for being treated unfairly
I do agree that warnings arent worth much rn
I sure as hell wouldn’t want to be muted. A warning idc, but a mute would make me stfu, cause I do want to be able to contribute meaningful things
1 hour? Damn I've gone as high as 24 lol
some people could use 24-hr mutes tbh
Yeah that's been my issue for many months now
1 hour should be enough for minor people and to deter them from getting a warning if they become meaningful one day mutes
Like legit I feel some of the mods are scared to be viewed negatively or completely hated bc of trying to fix things
24 hours in peak season NATL is like weeks of missed information when that time comes lol,
Some mods are nice guys mods and then strict mods. This creates that uneven moderation view
I tend to be both and that's what seemed to worked in my last stint
I'll be very chill but turn right around if someone is causing a ruckus
1 hour for under 18
You don’t want mods to be hated. But obviously you’re mods for a reason. So do the job. Don’t just make friends lol
Mhm
- Become more consistent with moderation
- Overhaul rules and info by splitting the channel
- Make this the punishment system to make warnings meaningful
Would this be a good 3 step plan to present to the mod team considering you want to go down the path of being more consistent? @lusty osprey
4 make rob mod again
Kids wouldn’t last 1 hour away from natl chat…
thanks for breaking things down I'll bring these suggestions up with everyone
Warnings should only be used if someone isn't actively doing something
People will lie about their age. Or just refuse to give it
Like giving someone a warning while they're literally derailing an entire chat is pathetic lmao
we can't be age based bc people can lie about their age
Dany when he misses the obvious joke
smh
anyways
Maybe once I get a job and can make a consistent schedule and times I can come in
Rob with a job 😎
Otherwise I’d be terminally online again
jobert
Very oversimplified so maybe not 100% in that order but something like that
If it wasn’t oversimplified it’d be an entire book
Lmao
we made a priority list recently and these will likely be added in
I hope moderation could coalesce around a plan like that and I’m sure it’d be in the interest of the administration to see less complaints and more positive comments
The admins already have the YT project to work on
I've honestly never seen a moderation system as complicated as the one we're trying to use now which is funny because by my standards this server is damn tiny
Consistency is the biggest thing mates. Expect the same actions from every mod. We don’t need people thinking “well x mod is in the chat so I can break rules”
That's assuming half of the mod team would ever be in a chat
If I had a dollar for every time I have said the word consistency I'd have no college debt lol
That and if we go off of last time people just ping me to make sure no one gets away with shit lmao
Or DM
yessss
My DMs are open as I get many but also acknowledge all of them
So if there's something going on or you want to talk to me about something whether moderation or off-topic or whatever, they are there
Someone TLDR
I would like to reiterate my suggestion to change the punishment system seeing the new #rules being posted. This would make warnings actually meaningful
Swap warnings and mutes, warnings are now the equivalent of a strike
Lesser offenses can get mutes from 10 minutes to perhaps 12 hours max. DM with a mod may follow one of these mutes for communication
Major offenses get warned, or too many lesser offenses deemed by mods to be too many, these warnings carry a mandatory 24 hour mute. Can be extended to 1-5 days based on moderator discretion. 3 of these in 3 months (1/4 year) will earn a mandatory ban discussion and procedures in the mod server
Seeing from my 3 years of experience in the chat rooms and from being a mod, mutes that last days for a “strike” or warning will be meaningful and will deter future rule breaks. No one will want to be unable to talk across the entire server for days missing landfalls, either they improve themselves or leave.
Of course, trolls and extreme offenses get banned immediately
Thank you for your suggestion. We will consider it, there have been many suggestions on how to improve the warning/mute system and we'll have a discussion on it : ).
Rules and info have been split and tcos guidelines have been updated to be more precise
Late but funnily enough, I got wind of the reason for me not having the role being my immaturity lmao
If TCA can’t have the participant role at least give him the advanced tropical one
Now I notice this may not have been y’all’s intent when making the discrimination rule however the way in which gender is never explicitly mentioned in this rule and instead can only be inferred to be lumped into the “actions that can harm a persons sentiments or beliefs” gives off a vibe of believing that people who are transgender only believe they are trans rather than knowing for a fact that they are transgender.(in doing so, potentially invalidating trans people and the research that has been done about gender)
I feel like a simple solution should be that it’s more explicitly clarified in these rules that discrimination off the basis of gender isn’t allowed.
...What
anyways
Sam you've made a lot of big leaps but that's nuts
there needs to be another code called north atlantic and it's permanently code yellow or higher lmao
lol fr
i just find it funny that yall stole the old graphic concept and made it uglier
yall even copy/pasted the disclaimer i wrote 💀
time to play a game of "who wore it better"
Glad to see the response to pointing out a legitimate issue with the rules gets met with “your crazy there isn’t a problem”.
It's the fact you randomly threw around this accusation that the server is transphobic rather than simply just bringing it up and asking for it to be added
Try again.
I am merely pointing out how this stance can be construed justifiably as transphobic and it would be wise to make adjustments to fix the problem.
I did not say f13 was transphobic anywhere in this though.
I say we add "gender identity" to the list to make things more clear. This is just another one of those rules that could easily be loopholed, and not in a good way.
That's damn exactly what that entire paragraph just sounded like
Why is your first reaction to a concern to deflect and blame the accuser based on your own feelings of the matter rather than listening and working through the problem?
I agree with this, it’s a simple fix.
Not my feelings lmfao I was asked about it in dms
And how am I blaming the accuser if there's apparently no accuser
The way you are acting comes off to me as quite reactionary and defensive, and frankly unconstructive as you have added nothing really to positively add to the conversation.
Which it was clearly an accusation by the way you've said it a million times in the past both here and on other servers
We aren’t talking about the past though, we are quite literally talking about now where there was supposed to be a full-scale reform of the way the moderation team approaches things, is it an irrational thing to expect a supposedly reformed team with reformed rules to actually try and address a loophole in the system that is present now?
There was a full scale reform, a few words missing from paragraphs upon paragraphs of rules and other related things is not going to create a loophole
Those rules were practically written by a singular person who has a lot more on her plate then just that
Why is there only one person writing those rules though?
Because she's an administrator
She doesn't come up with all the rules, the mod team does as a whole but someone has to write them
And it's a lot of writing
Even with that; I still fail to see how editing into the already posted discrimination list “gender identity” which can take upwards of 2 button clicks and 10 seconds to be an issue.
Great, thank you.
lol
The way the rule writing went was we had a meeting to discuss various topics (this was back in March) including the rules (the rules were a primary topic), then the rules were written by Ethan and they had to go through a motion to be enacted
I can see why you brought the issue up Sam, and that is something that should be made more clear and I'll amend that rule shortly.
Thank you very much Miami, appreciate it! 💚
why is it worse?
i dont think its worse overall, it includes the points of each code colour, which yours didnt, the slowmode times are more reasonable, shouldnt have 0 second slowmode because then spammers could spam more easily, only thing which id say isnt as good is the shadow of each colour used compared to the background and text colour
yea the actual codes themselves are better (thank god) but the design is just noisy and kinda hard to look at idk maybe just me
nah i also think the design is uglier lol
the title text being in center format even though it's on the left side of the image:
OH MY GOD THAT IRKS ME SO BAD
i didnt notice that until now
So I thought it was discussed that people who derail chat with busting comments will be dealt with more seriously but it seems to still continue without any warnings or measures. This also results in the trolls joining them and then completely derailing chat.
^ to add to this as well, NATL has increasingly become a lot of history talk. Which becomes distracting or even “misleading” for those who don’t have context
Ok I'll put out a notice that anyone continuing to do so will be automatically warned/muted, if it happens just ping me and it'll be dealt with
Sounds good, might want to pin it as well so that trolls can’t use the excuse of not seeing it
no more warnings
go straight to strikes
that's the only way to get NATL chat in line
im not muting people for minor offences
suggestion:
make oscae trial mod again and teach him how to make proper decisions
great idea
Literally provide the message magik said in the logs, and a clarification. That’s all I ask
why did something happen?
scroll down from here things got worse from here #chit-chat message
Holy shit that was bad
if there was no actual slur there should be no warning
period
i feel bad for magik man i really do
There was no context on if it was used to someone or used in a different way. And without them sharing what was said it’s hard to know if it was warranted
At least from my POV, I didn’t see the message. So from my ignorance of the message
none of it matters if he didnt even use the actual word
I think for future reference, warnings need to be worded in a way that identifies the rule broken rather than just "you know what you did".
^^^ that was extremely unprofessional too
Agreed
we need new mod leaders
we are taking steps in the wrong direction here
nothing against oscar - i love that guy to pieces but i think they jumped the gun adding him back so quickly
There should be maturity/age requirements
rather than a chat GPT generated mod application 😂
I mean, if I was a trial mod and I worded a warning in an unprofessional manner, it would have been an automatic fail.
^
well it doesnt help when the mod leaders are incredibly disconnected from their own team
half if not more of the mods only hold the position for the status it comes with
Oh definitely lol
agG made a good point when he said that "some people apply for just the mod badge and power trip instead of actually having the intention to improve moderation in the server and make it a better place." And I couldn't agree more.
Correct, I had to go back and change it
Moderation doesn't seem to be taking the logs seriously enough
We have them for a reason 🙄
Oh they do
0 doubt about it it's a running issue
exactly
can you even demote a mod to a trial mod?
no
This exposes the thing where some moderators are too casual when it comes to warnings.
There used to be one for maturity
Dunno why thats gone
maturity is still taken in effect when accepting mod applications.
there is and some participant roles were removed bc of this
I think he meant for mod applications not participants
Oh we do take that into account ofc . There isn't an age requirement but there sure is a maturity one
Age vs maturity is a tough measurement . You can have some 13 year olds that are very mature and and some 16 to 18 year olds that act like they are 4 or 5 ..so age requirement vs maturity can be a double edged sword at times
that's why we just have a maturity requirement
Can i just suggest that during code red, mods should be more ruthless with warnings and mutes? A lot of trolls barely care about warnings (to the point where they are gloating to the mod on being warned) and trying to go easy on them doesn’t generally help anyone and only makes chat more chaotic.
I'll make sure this is known
just summon me if need be, I'll gladly be ruthless
Yea I know you and Rev are generally very strict but this kinda goes back to consistency between moderation and atleast in code red, all mods imo should be going hard on infractions otherwise chats will continue to spiral into chaos.
oh well aware
NATL isn't moderated enough I agree and I can't be there to moderate it all the time so the fact it gets less strict is disappointing
On that note, in light of a certain EWRC statement of Idalia
Before mods take action against someone for giving misinformation, can it please be verified every time that the statement was indeed misinformation before action is taken? Even if a statement made 20 times is false, it could be true the 21st time.
This is also a suggestion for every member of the community apart from non-mods to not immediately make conclusions that a statement is misinformation before it is verified/refuted. I myself was one of those members that did so, apologetically.
Also yeah code reds need to be more consistently strict
Also imo during code reds, idk if anyone has the power to do this, but certain emoji reactions should be banned during code reds like the ones that cannot be used helpfully in any context whatsoever
Like
and some more
Not a feature, unfortunately
Granted most of the reaction emojis in F13 are extremely overused, cause problems, and are just downright bad
Yknow I exist lol
I can add and remove emojis
And yet the community like them so
No I personally think emoji reactions are better kept
Especially in times when slowmode can get painfully long, it’s much better to reply to simple yes/no questions with Xs or checks, starboard funny/important things, etc.
Give @tacit schooner participant. 🙏
also
for the love of GOD
remove maturity from participant requirements
its ridiculous
sanj not being allowed status because he says "die"
like hello??? what is this fucking preschool
there is reasons why it exists, participants are suppose to be somewhat role models within community who are knowledgeable, but dont also joke alot, because if some unknowledgeable person saw someone with participant making a bunch of jokes because its unclassified (which sanj did sometimes) then if they wouldnt get jokes (and alot of people dont get jokes) then they might believe it
and i dont think this is the only reason, he posted a couple fake advisories, which tricked alot of people
I don’t hold a respectable position in this server but neither of those reasons are valid
cool.
thats an issue why?
Anyone with the slightest bit of a brain should realize the joking nature of people sometimes
Depends on how ridiculously fake they were, when they were posted, and in what channel to begin with
If it was posted in fake news that just invalidates the whole reason lmao, but even if not then people should be able to read the room and know they’re fake 💀
there against the rules, one of them i think put like a 10% aoi saying it was 70% or something
it was posted in actual tracking channels too
Unless if it was during a code yellow+ or smth then I guess that’s understandable
What was TCOS code, what channel, and how did people react overall
The rules don’t have to be followed 100% of the time otherwise this is a dictatorship
if rules arent followed 100% of the time, your saying its ok to break the rules, not once but like 3 times in this case
idk TCOS code, but this was the fake TWO posted (and in reality it was 0%)
It’s about a remnant low in the middle of nowhere are you serious
ok cool
the reaction to it everyone believed it
but if your a participant, you really shouldnt be sending fake things like that
its not funny if you fall for it as everyone did at the time
I can totally understand if a fake advisory was made about, for example, TS Idalia RIed to C2 in 6 hours
yes and that was in a code orange+ for most of its life too
not an unclassified pacific fish
It’s about a remnant low in the middle of nowhere. If he does this excessively frequently then maybe that’s a problem, but if this happened only a few times then that harms literally no one
Participant does factor in maturity yes
Posting a fake advisory in an unclassified channel in the middle of the central pacific can not judge maturity
Maturity is not measured by one-off incidents
I don't think people realize you can also have too much maturity
Bro if u can’t have some fun u become militaristic. Which this sever alrdy is basically
Life threatening or land threatening that’s different of course, no one argues that.
Find another system for code red storms, because we've lost three valuable chat related conversations now (Judy, Kevin, and Kirogi) and the F13 Data Analysis Team's progress on the 2022-23 SHEM season reanalysis has been hampered by loss of operational data from these chats
And please find a solution as soon as possible
Yeah some people post really valuable information in the chats, stuff that can often be used and searched with no problem via the discord search tool. But that’s obviously a problem if the place it was posted in no longer exists. Maybe make use of the elsewhere channel, or make multiple elsewhere channels for specific basins to be used as an automatic default when the main basin chat must be used for an ongoing threat.
even just using the thread feature would work i think
you can still see threads from when we used them in WPAC
and no-one complains about them clogging up stuff and things
the biggest problem in particular is real time observations
Older threads have even gotten deleted
because many of these are not archived
not the ones in WPAC
We just need better communication on which forums we're archiving
There has to be a better way in dealing with these
I still don't fully know why the chats for Judy and Kevin got deleted, the mod who deleted them never responded when we asked
The loss of Judy's obs in particular hurts the most
I wouldnt delete any of them
because half of that storm's BT is driven by them
And yes I would recommend never deleting any of them
there must be some sort of archive bot that archives old chats in a safe storage space
and also out of any forum you could delete, 2 invests in a forum arent deleted (for 98W and 99W during talim) but kirogi was?
if there is any forums you delete, its when its only for an invest
and even then i stilll wouldnt agree with the decision
Also I did some read up, and there are no limits on archived posts/threads
I'd imagine the removing comes to try and keep the forum channel less cluttered and more easy to sort through
Though I have added several tags to help with sorting, and I'm sure we can add more
so we don't really need to delete finished forums
archived forums go to the bottom of the list anyway, so i dont see the issue
Does that mention any restriction on forum tags?
none
Oh no restrictions
That's handy
So here's my suggestion
no need to delete any archived forums
at all
It's fine because even if it gets crowded, there's a giant search toolbar right at the top
We constantly monitor for potential new participants and I'm gonna be honest, we are quite strict on what is determined to be very good knowledge. Jagger imo is not quite there yet, and it would help if you can expand and tell us why it would be a good idea bc I may be wrong here but Im judging off what I have seen, would be nice.
And believe it or not that isnt the reason really. We've actually recognized his decent knowledge but we're wanting to wait a little longer to be confident he is definitely good enough, ideally people that stand out a lot with their knowledge is a good sign they might need the role
SanJ is a very different situation
Considering I talk with him on a semi regular basis and knowing him he thinks he isnt there yet himself
He has been considered multiple times now though to become purple but yeah. Just a little more to go
And people please stop demonising the moderation team. If anything, that behaviour in itself is childish and not something adults should be saying to and about others.
How would you feel if you tried to moderate and everyone keeps saying such things about how you moderate whilst you know it is not true.
Think about that.
I do not think highly of this moderation team as I myself see a lot of flaws still that should be worked on until they are out of the system. But in this case I am getting kind of fed up by all the bullshit being spread around.
Ty alex
Yea agree with you, some of the mods atleast are trying their best to make this server a better place so a lot of this complaining of it is pretty tiring.
It was also very frustrating to see when Rev correctly banned a troll in chat yesterday and there were a group of people rallying to defend the troll just because they like to create drama in chat
rev also deleted a forum which had actually important information that could be used later for reanalysis since alot of data is put in those chats
not entirely sure but might be possible to restore it via audit logs
I cannot access them but it might be possible perhaps
Threads in discord is pretty new so hiccups will happen along the way
forums* and there about a year and a half old
It is unfair to put the blame on it for someone accidentally getting it wrong once
its happened a few times, but they said that because kirogi "got annihlated" it "wasnt worth archiving" and also Saola was still code red so it broke protocol and was added back just hours later in an entirely new thread
and rev the other day also broke the same protocol by making a thread rather then forum, but at that time i wouldnt blame them as it was the first time they had done it
and also if there not archiving any forums it should be the ones on invests, but no they did it to a likely typhoon
A lot of work goes into moderating a place like this, especially when they are trying to make changes happen, personally i think mistakes can happen and as long as they are working to fix it, it’s not an issue
Maybe we can have a role which works to manage forums and threads so that moderation team can focus on the moderation part
That should help everyone imo
also doesnt help that when i asked a mod the reason why it was deleted (before i knew the actual reason), i was given a different reason that wasnt the real reason
i was told because they cant archive too many forums
which is an absolute lie because theres no limit
there is only 6 forums
as well
there is also a big search tool
and the archived ones go to the bottom so it shouldnt be hard to find active ones for active systems
I've tried. I dont think you can at all even with me as off duty. But do a quick google search see what u can find perhaps
I dont know man and Im sorry, we'll make sure that doesnt happen again
It was stupid
Rev did it for some reason which ill look to, but yeah stuff like that shouldnt happen
It’s lessons learnt imo and as long as steps are taken to prevent it, we can hopefully move on from it
But i still think there should be a role for managing forums and threads
Mods have so much shit going on in active periods that it would make sense to let someone else handle that
I think if we have enough mods eventually all should be fine
Or we could let the participants manage them
I dont think that would be a bad idea
precious data from judy and kevin were completely obliterated which makes no sense....
wasnt there like a SWIO chat at some point too
i mean, swio thread
Yeah and it's a shame but there is very little that can be done about that and all can be done is move on, learn, and not do something like that again
hope nothing like kirogi happens again
all stuff relating to its mere C1 status has evaporated.... 🗿
Yeah we'll make sure we coordinate more on thread management
overall jsut dont delete threads theres gonna be stuff in there and someone may need it at some point
i mean
FORUMs
Regarding this, you would probably need more participants especially active ones if it were to be properly implemented
Omg this is driving me insane they r ltierally the same thin g
They are pretty much
there probably arent enough WPAC participants for this
actually there probably arent enough WPAC mods in general
I dont think we would many tho. There are some mods around able to do it too so its not like we need a whole new team
Im around there so effectively +1 since the new wave of mods
And when I mean i'm there, I mean consistently
a lot of the time wpac goes unmoderated so idk.....
not all the time but just often
Maybe in local time sure, im asleep and generally rn im off duty so u dont see me as often
yes in local time
i believe yes
We would definitely need more local mods
theres actually only like 2 mods thats actually in asia
jeremy and jackson idk if theres more
part of the point of participant is they are active, so i dont think being active would be an issue
kathy
adding onto the participant discussion earlier, i concur with Adler that there is plenty of work to be done with participants and advanced roles. i have been working on a proposal to make the #met-room visible to all members of the server so they can read through the advanced discussions and learn from the information presented. this change would also encourage participants to engage in conversations there again. additionally, I've been planning to grant chat immunity to all chats for participants, along with pin privileges and the ability to create forums/threads.
i can't personally speak on who needs adding and whom needs removing, but i have plenty of ideas that would certainly happen if this overhaul were to go through.
oh ya forgor
to make the 🔒 No Access visible
Certainly in support, if only i could take part in that discussion but i kinda cant lmao
Kathy and srijan, but note Kathy is extremely busy and so is jeremy at times, so u would be at 2 which are able to probably moderate on a large enough scale
isnt srijan nio
NIO is still asia
ok yeah that makes sense ims tupud
all cool lol
because srijan doesnt moderate wpac that leaves 1 🤪
Oh shit yeah im an idiot
And not often does jackson come around there either so that leaves 0 🙃
Ur welcome to give it a go
You don’t need to tell me that lol, i am probably one of the most active ones here but not everyone is very active
That’s why i suggested that we add more as long as they meet the requirements
dont trust myself 🙃
well the existing criteria prevents there from being too many more
I probably would mod too if I wasn’t so hesitant on modding.
I am in the same boat tbh, i have thought about it but i don’t know if I will be able to do a good job of it
id be a mod but i dont have 2fa (which i would get but i dont have a phone either)
the participant review back in last month was clearly rushed. and i am planning to change the definition of participants on what makes them one. strict maturity shouldn't be required and i would like to make the role not just a mod-popularity role lol
Agree on both of those points
Just making it clear here
- Maturity will remain criteria to be a participant. If they're gonna be representing the knowledgeable people of the server, they also need to be reliable. Instances of those choosing to break the rules or post misinformation or whatever will cause the reliability in the information to be lost, no matter how good they sound.
- Participants will not be given perms to create forums or pin messages. Just ask one of the mods to do it, giving perms tends to grant more than just that usually leading on to problems as a result. After all it should be the mods keeping up with that stuff because if stuff isn't being pinned, that looks bad on us and thats something for us to look into.
However making the met room public (however only visible for those not participants) is something we can look into doing
It did not, actually. Any actual information important to the storm would be located in https://discord.com/channels/270341304624349185/1144367892218003466. Kirogi was originally part of this forum for the majority of its life before it was separated and by this time was dead
Discord is the easiest way to communicate over voice, video, and text. Chat, hang out, and stay close with your friends and communities.
Well, they already can pin lol (as long as they have 2FA enabled)
That’s a perm associated with bypassing slowmode
I did not break protocol as that thread contained only AOIs that the chat overwhelmingly wanted in a thread. It wasn't until one of those became an active system that we had to move it into the forums
it peaked a couple hours after the forum was made
why did in the past it have forums for aois not threads
for example 2 invests were put in forum during talim
And it still would've taken place in the other forum or even the channel because there was no one to guide anyone into the correct forum
and still think its a bit stupid to be deleting forums rather then archive
I'm not archiving a 70 message thread that has the majority of the messages be "RIP this storm"
The archive feature was to allow people to look back through conversations and see what the community was doing at the time. It was not to store valuable information
it certainly had more then 70 messages
It had 70 messages
And yes, I would know because I scanned through (which only took me about a minute)
I didn’t see how many it had but I wouldn’t imagine it had much
When the forum was made the storm was dying I believe, past it’s typhoon peak
no it peaked slightly after
also it was deleted when WPAC was still code red in the main chat for saola, so it still should of been in forum either way
because just a couple hours later it got its own forum again (which after another couple of hours before a combined forum)
Regardless, there was nothing important in there enough worth archiving and that's that
you could say the same about other forums
(This won't happen again, forums are easily searchable anyway so this isn't like threads where everything gets cluttered easily.)
like this one
(No more deletions will take place on forums no matter how useless they seem.)
Ahh yeah I see that now
a
such a great and informative suggestion
Thank you!
I think moderation needs to be consistent when it comes to warnable offenses all throughout the tracking channels. You have #716216186685227028 going off-topic when there's legit no storm to track and people complaining about the 240 hour rule, which all started when Trin got onto a moderator by saying, "It's not my fault.".
Make it clear in the rules about restricting photosensitive gifs/videos. And give a CLEAR and defined example of what is restricted.
Any one here could easily have fallen victim to a warn about that. I do not think folks should be warned for things not defined in the rules.
perhpas put an age requirement for even joining this server, because clearly its overrun with 13-15yo who have no sliver of social intelligence.
what should the age requirement be
It's common sense to not try to injure someone????
it is official, because its in the TOS
Or trigger issues they may have without warning???
You’re making this more extreme
i mean it didnt really look triggerish
but apparently theres been more then one person who doesnt get that
so clearly there needs to be a rule
was it malicious in nature or was it just a rapidly strobing gif
since f13 is a partner and community server, we can't higher the age requirement unfortunately
also you cant expect people to follow a rule that does not exist
Rapidly strobing, was why it was only a warning
As the son of someone with photosensitive epilepsy (or something similar), I feel like you are right.
White text on a black background with "/s" written on it that was flashing a bit
It wasn’t, and multiple people agreed it was not strobing enough
it was NOT rapidly strobing lol
yeah
It was quick enough
i asked multiple people
Xavier that warning was in poor taste im not gonna lie
No lol
yeah
It wasn't
rapidly strobing is a huge overstatement
I agree with Xavier... I feel like the GIF could've been spoilered with a content warning for flashing images as it could've hurt someone. Though I do agree it should be stated in the rules for the future.
person who has had seizures multiple times before themslves saying that it didnt even trigger them
Age limit for this server is 13 and will stay 13
some of yall too sensitive especially when no one had a problem with it. if someone did have a problem that would be different
a verbal reminder should be fine, actual punishment for a one-off offense that isnt even in the rules is kinda jumping the gun
of course they should be called out by a warning seems too far
Again this was why it was only a WARNING. Most times that shit gets mutes at the very least
yes
You’re expecting too much from a discord server one. And aswell in large other servers you can find gifs as the one posted here. Make it clear, or suck it up is how I see it.
It was not in the rules. Therefor should not be warned.
and the person left because of it
you can't spoiler gifs, discord removed that feature for some reason
To be fair, it falls under common sense. It caused a ruckus.
No
really?
Wait you can't spoiler GIFS??? I didn't realise that was removed
ye
I expect basic human decency
Well the gif itself didn't cause a ruckus, the action taken against it did
Nobody would have noticed it otherwise lol
also, a lot of mods wouldnt warn for that either. this alludes to the inconsistency within the team still
you expect people to not post gifs?
A gif that flashes is not a human tragedy wtf lmao
that's so dumb
Wouldn't have been a ruckus if it was agreed to in an attempt to be consistent with previous punishments for the same actions
yes, and plus the "sending gifs that may cause seizures" isnt a rule so a warning shouldnt have been taken for a non-rule
yeah none of this would have happened if a verbal reminder would have happened instead
then again idrk much
Yall want punishments for one thing then different for the same thing but then back to something lesser for the same thing
Like come the fuck on
the fact the guy left the damn server because of it
xavier litteraly told him too leave
exactly
I told him to leave the chat for a bit
are you serious
On my side it says he's still in here. Maybe I need to refresh-?
Not to leave the damn server
First, the guy was warned for misinformation. Then it was the strobing GIF that causes headaches.
Everyone knew what he meant

@uneven mountain are you photosensitive btw
I thought he meant as in leave the convo
sure you told him to just leave the chat xavier, sure
The amount of people who've said "I'm just gonna leave" to refer to leaving the chat is many many ._.
Why are there mod white knights in here, if yall are cool with it then spend time somewhere else lol
i do think this was a confusion as i thought the same but it shouldnt have been said by a mod either way
Misinfo warning was appropriate. however it could have also been chocked up to a lack of proper knowledge which makes the case that the mod team isnt welcoming to lesser knowledgeable people
There's a reason I said to reconsider what he was saying to try and get him out of the grave he was digging
its more likely that the guy didnt have much knowledge as the person later on said that "alt? do you mean atl?"
He chose not to
A reminder would've sufficed just fine, honestly. When it comes to random one-off things like that just delete it and remind why gifs like that may not be allowed
Very much agree here. He probably had no idea the unreliability
If you were asking me (which I don't think you wrre,) then no, I'm not.
??? i was very clearly asking eg
the misinfo case wasnt blatant and thus warning was a stretch
And this is why the moderation is so inconsistent, no wonder no one is supposed to know what to do for anything because we change what punishment we give for the same damn actions
You weren't asking me? Okay
There was no reason to not explain to him why he should reconsider and explain the lack of knowledge he may have had. But you chose to not, and basic verbal warn him
then make a fucking mod guideline for gods sake
This is the first time I've ever seen a mod give a blatant warning for something like this lol
one of yall needs to step up and do it
says punishment is inconsistent
multiple people telling him that just a reminder wouldve been fine
we have no guidelines in place lol
THATS YOUR FUCKING ISSUE THEN
OMG
FIX THAT
Based on discussion from other moderators they would also have just sent a reminder
who is the moderator in charge
Yes but this is Xavier we’re talking about lol
i've been planning to make a guideline proposal but as a newly joined regular moderator it would be difficult
I don't know what this adds but I have photophobia & have to wear transition lenses & use dark mode on every device I have because of it (my eyes are sensitive to various lights)
bro the fact Igave this place money at some point 😭
that fucking sucks
the guy hasnt left yet
fr fr
Yeah it's saying dude is still in the server, I don't think he actually left
yeah. ive been trying to apply for contributor though for like 2 months now
Guidelines can only get you so far and no situation in the same. Moderators need to be quick and have wit to handle situations appropriately and know how to handle what happens afterwards
I expect all on this team to be able to come up with solutions swiftly but that doesn't seem to be the case
Never in my 6 years across multiple servers have I ever seen a team that needed set guidelines
So you get strict ass Xavier to Matthew (love him)
i think joshua from chit chat summed it up the best
he said to the person who got warned "you are not the problem, the problem is how the rules/mod structure is"
bro what the guy is posting in chit chat is making me feel really bad for him
It’s a prime example of the chaotic nature of the mod team though and the extreme lack of guidance
there should atleast be a general rule of thumb for mods
lets be real here, most of the people on the team should not be on the damn team
period
i feel like no matter who the mods are the same problems come up
There is such thing as being too lenient, which I'm sure many of us know, but there is also such thing as being too strict and I don't think that is discussed enough
#OssiDidNothingWrong
xavier is most certainly on the too strict side
False
Rev and fridge recently are prime examples of consistent moderation. And this is what I would look for from a moderation team
You think Xavier is strict? When I was a mod in multiple servers, I was much worse on the strict side.
whatevs, i agree with alex here
Granted a one-off situation like that should've been handled in the commands channel undoubtedly
the guy just left no😭
#OssiDidNothingWrong
When it isn't active chat disruption that needs to be attended to it should always be handled elsewhere
getting who?
i cant believe this made him leave smh, wasnt even his fault
honestly, i think Ethan is unfit for the admin role, hes done absolutely nothing in the main server in some time
xavier after making someone leave the server for something that shouldve only been a reminder
You can't dm people unless you're either friends with them or share a server and both have dms on
Very much agree here
#OssiDidNothingWrong
#OssiDidNothingWrong
yes, ive only seen ethan in like vc's n stuff
Seemingly doesn’t assist in moderation or guidance
I think Xavier meant well... I feel like a restructuring to the rules could be done to help ensure this doesn't happen in the future. Add to the rules, make them more clear. Maybe change warnings to verbal reminders if they weren't done in malicious intent.
It's been the case for ages now