#Superman
1 messages · Page 6 of 1
Bad superhero movie fatigue is
It is
He never made a 4 hour movie lol
No, not super hero fatigue... shit films fatigue
Thunderbolts was a good movie and yet it didn’t succeed in the box office. Especially overseas
Or fatigue of superhero movies that all feel the same no uniqueness whatsoever
Oppenheimer felt like 5 lol
They don’t use a specific genre when adapting comics like they used to
Lol the complete opposite. People are hyped https://x.com/mejat32/status/1945750188892565809?s=46&t=_AWFhpIAIwbUeGd6RdGh0A
#TheOdyssey has sold over 23K tix at 22 locs across North America. Most of the shows are either SOLD OUT or near. The Chinese Theatre alone has sold over 3K tix.
ONE YEAR OUT.
It’s not a bad film, but every character is a “slightly different version of an iconic character”
Yeah that’s BS and you know it lol…
Oppenheimer, a slow paced drama made almost a billion. Barbenheimer marketing helped, but Nolan is clearly a big brand himself.
Well the Thunderbolts in this movie are not the same team from the comics at all
It’s not BS. Nolan has huge pull internationally
Oppenheimer was long and R rated yet made 900 million
It made 975 million
I am so hyped for Fantastic Four
Same 😊
F4 will probably have strong legs
What I mean is independent theaters putting up preorder numbers for a film that doesnt even have a run time or full distribution numbers contracted is just hilarious BS
How
The last F4 movie everyone hated so much that the franchise was set back another 10 years
And now the mcu is facing bad faith
I think it will have better WOM than Superman. People tend to give MCU more chance.
It’s still more stable than DCU.
If F4 is acclaimed, then I can see it outgross Superman.
It’s also going to be a more serious movie.
I wouldn’t judge it until the full film and numbers are in, but so far from the preview audiences it does seem positive.
What does that have to do with reception
Too early to say “it has legs” just yet lol
I think one reason Superman isn’t doing well overseas is James Gunn’s terrible sense of humor, which people are getting tired of.
Yup, right now the critics can only say “good/bad/ok”
Superman has already won in terms of critical reception, yes it would be great if it makes money but that isn't the only thing. People tend to forget that Batman begins made only 385 million dollars worldwide back in 2005 when DC was in tatters.. not the same situation of course but DC is being rebooted.
Batman Begins made that during an era where superhero genre wasn’t even that popular.
Can’t compare
That's your opinion, a lot of us like Gunn's sense of humour and his Guardians movie did very well internationally
Begins like Spider-Man 1 and X-Men revolutionised the genre
Who said that? The reviews from audience and critics are overwhelmingly positive. There’s a very vocal minority that are pushing that perspective very hard, but isn’t the concensus.
His GOTG movies only did well due to the MCU brand. Without Feige, he’s nothing.
I mean, yes we can .. Spiderman 1 and 2 were already released. DC's Batman was dead as well at that time.
Totally disagree..
People universally loved Guardians 3 and that was recent so I doubt that the majority is "sick of his humour" ngl
Suicide Squad flopped for example lol. If Gunn was so great, then it should’ve made huge numbers even during pandemic era.
Superman as a character has never been popular like Batman internationally
Not only was GOTG 3 a darker film than Superman, it was also less goofy than the previous GOTG films. Besides the MCU brand helped
Oh come on.. that movie was also released in HBO max at the same time as theatres plus it was pandemic.. no way it was gonna make money. What happened to Guardians 3 later??
It also had more depth than Superman. I’m not surprised GOTG 3 was more universally liked.
The main thing that Gunn had to do with Superman was make it so that majority of people liked or loved it and that's absolutely the case.
Yes it isn't doing well internationally and that's because the DC brand was in tatters.
I'm actually really surprised it is doing this well domestically actually.. like if we saw past DC reception this movie would have flopped hard
I'd say about 45:30:25... there are still a QUARTER dislike
I wouldn’t be surprised if Supergirl does better💀, but I’m just going to say it will make less than Superman for now.
Also, Gunn isn't gonna direct each and every DC movie.. he has said there will be different tones of DCU movies, Supergirl is gonna be quite dark than Superman.
Let’s see the final WW for Superman.
My guess is that Gunn will either direct Superman 2 next or Justice league movie later
It doesn't get much better than this for DC movie to be honest. I've seen the movie twice and loved it more second time.
WB knows that too, they said so themselves that they are "prepared for a long haul" at a recent investors call... so yeah I think they are actually pleasantly surprised Superman is even getting the numbers it's getting.
Wait you’re saying Gotg 3 has more depth?
Zaslav ain't stupid if you ask me.. he's gonna give Gunn some time to make DC work
Don't get me wrong, I LOOOOOVE the film, but I'm looking at a pure stastical points... it has a much stronger hater voice than I would've expected... not expected, but not surprised either, honestly.
brings back headline of Zaslav saying The Flash is the best superhero movie ever made
I mean.. there are still Snyder bros around
Somehow lower than Superman Returns
They aren’t the only people who aren’t big on this movie, even some Snyder haters don’t like this one
Hence, I theorise Supergirl would probably make more. There’s a huge appeal to Cavill’s Superman for a particular reason, and it’s not just online. I know it seems baffling because Superman is a traditionally lighthearted hero, but in the modern era, the general audience globally just doesn’t like Boy Scouts.
Zaslav IS stupid, but he had been pushed to relinquish control of the DC parts to Gunn by the investors and board, so he has to live with that.
Different era... back then people are not cynical about DC, now they are.
Although Returns does have lower scores on other websites like lb and such
What ??
Metacritic
I dont get how returns has a 72 on metacritic
Maybe the attempt at making a love letter to Superman 1978 🤷♂️
That's just one site though
No doubt, Superman has a RETURN TO FORM and REBOUND effect that is working for it. But that part doesn't affect the Snyderbros.
I like it more than MoS, but that's probably just me lol
Back then superhero genre was still not as popular as it is today.
its not suffering if its peak
In terms of success, the golden age of CBMs started during the 2010s.
After Returns it was clear WB wanted a total hard reboot on Superman
The Odyssey will have Nolan draw for absolutely sure, but the early teaser isn't helping... anyone but the diehard are going to view it as a Oppenheimer-style slow drama. They have a year to mess with the marketing yet though, so I don't have enough info to draw on to make a conclusion or prediction.
With no connection to the past era
Btw
Starting in the 21st century
Every decade has had exactly one Superman movie as of now
Maybe this might continue who knows
The teaser was brilliant. I don’t know what you are on
I will just say, never underestimate Nolan, he has a huge fan base and that's rare for a director
As I said, that's the perception... unless the later trailer shows something exciting (and I know it will), there's not as much hype around the film AT THE MOMENT as the Nolan Diehards are predicting.
because its a year away
I don't underestimate him, I am saying the preview teaser SUCKED....
The Odyssey has more action than Oppenheimer as well. It appeals more to the general audience and you underestimate how big Nolan is overseas.
HOW?
3 dudes talking, one old man on a broken raft.
It’s also one of the greatest epics of all time.
no it didnt 😭
I’m not sure that’s the case
Precisely why the teaser sucked, for people familiar with Odyssey, it's underwhelming as hell.
I don’t think audiences dislike the Boy Scout trope
the teaser if naff though
Also, it’s Nolan. Many people are hyped for the movie after seeing the teaser.
I didn't say Odyssey sucked, I said the teaser sucked because we know there are some really brilliant stuff in Odyssey... show me a glimpse of how he's going to treat THOSE.
Nolan built that good faith
The Odyssey is full of gods and monsters, and the teaser is like 'look at the cast we have'
In fact, you’re the only person I have seen who thinks the teaser sucked.
Even Oppenheimer they did the whole joke marketing of "Nolan is going to use a real nuclear bomb" lol
Why we talking about Nolan in a Superman chat 😭
A small teaser is supposed to show all the Gods and monsters
no, but it should at least hint at the mystical
Precisely... it's not a good Teaser
Because the preview is in front of the movie directly... AFTER the lights dimmed... it's related hahaha
I have a horrible feeling that all the mythology will be a hallucination after Odysseus is shipwrecked after the war and can't deal with losing all his crew.
I don't really care about Telemachus lol...
Can we stop please and get back to Superman
Eren is right though, we need to stop lol
Ramayan is also releasing in 2026.
Stop, back to superman and possibly DC
Batman: Brave and the Bold will release sooner than you think
If it looks like Supergirl won’t do well.
why a clayface movie tho
Wonder Woman is also fast tracked to release
Love all the Easter eggs in this movie.. Gun has said he will release the whole thing
Dudes just started on SCRIPT in March THIS YEAR
Because Gunn loves side characters lol
Oooh I want to see a full of the Justice Hall mural so bad
They will speed it up
And I think Clayface isn't gonna cost much and it is gonna be a body horror, so if only a few people go watch it.. it maybe profitable like what Blumhouse has done
Same
You forget that Aquaman made over a billion dollars before and WW made over 700 million dollars too..
Too soon to tell what's gonna happen
And the second film was not successful. Aquaman 1 made a billion due to Jason Momoa.
What do you even mean? Even if the script is done TODAY, it'll take 2-3 months to greenlight, and 6-8 month of prep... earliest shoot time beginning of next year, add the normal 8-12 months post, we are looking at MINIMUM 2027.
Stop hopium.
He was pretty popular back then iirc
Only one actor being involved can't make that much money.. come on
And Mamoa is gonna play Lobo in supergirl too
Gunn himself has said its not that important if Superman makes a shit ton of money
I think people preferred Jason Momoa’s iteration. Aquaman prior Momoa was seen as lame fish dude.
Gunn will obviously not claim the opposite. He has to say that.
Aquaman has been cool in the comics for awhile, he just was mad fun of in cartoon parodies and stuff lol
The general audience do not care about comics. Before Momoa’s portrayal, he was seen as lame.
Did you see that interview with Momoa and Reynold's text to Gunn on the day of the announcements that he's taken over DC? lol
Moma's text: LOBO BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reynolds: Congratulations on becoming the head of DC
Gunn: Want to play Green Lantern again?
Reybolds: Fuck off.
He was cool in Smallville too
Ya.. it was fun
I’m still torn on Gunn using the KC logo for a mainstream classic Superman movie
I mean that’s earlier than expected lol. Supergirl is releasing next year and if that doesn’t do well, then they will definitely have to release a familiar IP.
There are so many errors in that statement I don't even....
One actor doesn't do anything, no matter who they are... a film is always a combination of factors which contributed to its success and failure.
And the second film failed because of Depp/Heard and the resulting studio worries, which caused endless re-shoots and reshuffling... in short... STUDIO meddling.
How did Aquaman 1 make a billion then
I didn’t say it was just one actor, but he was definitely the main reason.
Momoa was pretty popular back then
Just the S designs, and he's not using the black, and it has the classic yellow borders... but I get you
Yeah just the S design, idm the yellow outline
But I’m also not digging the neck collar
The second film also failed because the movie was mediocre. Aquaman 1 also had better visuals.
And it was also more goofy
I love the Alex Ross S, but yeah, since everything is so silly, why not go back to the original S for a bit more retro lol...
The collars I don't really mind, but it does hurt me for the same reasons reference to KC hurt you... "New 52" blerch
FUN, it was FUN... in a time where everything in DC was DARK
So because it copied the mcu formula
I'm not arguing that it's NOT mediocre... fuck that thing looks like a Sony Television commercial... and the story is... cynical... not fun.
MCU films aren’t even that goofy outside GOTG. If anything James Gunn is the reason behind the goofiness of MCU.
Maybe Joss Whedon as I see him being blamed a lot
Whedon’s Justice League definitely had similar humour.
Which one of these emblems would a casual viewer more easily recognize as the Superman emblem
I wouldn't quite say MCU formula... since it also produced WW1984... James Wan had a major hand in making the mishmash of genres work... but NOBODY can take the kind of studio unslaught and negative press on Amber Heard... the fact he made a somewhat watchable film is... already a testament of his abilities lol
Avengers and Age of Ultron had jokes, but definitely more serious than GOTG.
Joss Whedon did at least know when to dial it back in Avengers 1
Both, the red and the yellow is what made it recognizible, not the full design of the S
This is this logo people are more familiar with
Trust me, there were more divisive S designs lol
I think, as far as overall suit balance, and references, the team under Gunn did VERY well.
Just be glad they didn't go Superman: Year One
James Gunn’s ‘SUPERMAN’ had the biggest Wednesday box office of 2025 domestically with $11.8M
The film also had the biggest Tuesday box office of 2025 this week.
Read our review: https://t.co/3sWy8gsNCU
Never seen box office of a movie being analysed so minutely
Every film get analyzed that granularly, even down to theaters and regions if you are involved with the film... but rarely do they do that publicly yeah
Not like this though.. it is mostly weekly gross and stuff
The Domestic spread is way better than I expected ngl
It's fantastic
I've seen actual financial reports on films... but as I said, very rarely are the PUBLIC interested in that
True
I suspect that they are waiting for F4, to decide what to do on 2nd wave marketing right now
Ya
Because they only have a little fanfare on “number one in the country”… I think they are expecting and L next weekend, then go in guns blazing and burn the marketing they DIDN’T yet spend
Probably
I prefer Olsen hehe
Napkin math makes me feel that there are at least 20mil still in reserve on marketing
Just don’t kill him off in the next movie very early
He’s Jimmy Olsen, he’s in many iterations as important as Lois Lane….
Jimmy and the Mutant Toes will make a great marketing podcast on DC lol
Jimmy Olsen is getting a tv spin off
Ned gotta lock in next movie because jimmy clearly winning
Kevin Smith goes deep into the Fortress of Solitude in this spoiler filled review and break down of the James Gunn and the DCU's SUPERMAN!
CONNECT WITH US!
For the Audio Podcast: http://www.smodcast.com/channel/fatmanonbatman
Follow Kevin Smith on twitter at: htt...
He liked it enough to go to a 2pm with wife and 9pm by himself
First one id say
I honestly don’t have a problem or preference with either, it’s the man in the suit that matters for me, not the suit

I know I’m reaching, but I just thought that Kat Dennings would work as Lucy Lane hahaha
Saw superman
I liked Superman. Left with a smile but a little dissatisfied.
While the cast is amazing, and there are some great scenes and moments…there are also a lot of puzzling choices, tone shifts and overall..the story feels very messy and unfocused for what should be a standalone outing about superman.
Im excited for more though. I give it a 3.5/5
It was a standalone outing for Superman.. the movie was almost wholly focused on him and just like any other movies there were supporting characters..
Of course people will interpret it their way
and try to convince others.
people think violence in one situation is violence in all situations.
know what i mean, like its all the same reason?
like in another year, they'd draw paralells to george floyd or rodney king or vietnam or somesuch.
He should do justice league if he was to do one of those two
everybody trying to be political for the attention.
Sadly.. that's the time we live in
For me it is Superman 2 and Justice league much later.. Gunn is great at ensemble cast
there was a time i'd be worried about james gunn doing Batman...but Gog3 was dark as fuck.
i wanna see it
Gunn clearly can do dark stuff
He produced Brightburn
Also wrote the remake of Dawn of the Dead
Wait thats funny that gunn fans and Snyder fans hate each other so much
They’ve literally worked together
Snyder and Gunn are buddies, so yes it is ironic.
Would be funny if Snyder directs a DCU film
I don’t want him to, but it would be funny.
Yes, they gave this guy a lot of chances.
That's still more than a month from now and it would have made most of its money by then but this also shows that they aren't too bothered by the box office otherwise they would have kept this movie in theatres for months
Yikes…. why would they do that
Like I’m happy sure
but might as well give it more time to make cash at box office
Pandemic stuff releasing immediately at-home has poisoned releasing lol
Matthew Orton has submitted the script for Bane & Deathstroke film to James Gunn & Peter Safran.
︀︀
︀︀(Via @elmayimbe)
There was once a time when movies would stay in cinemas for up to half a year
dunno if netflix would carry it.
How I wish they met.
I mean wouldn't be bothered cause no one takes it seriously
yes
No, of course it isnt
They go VOD on 30-45 for more money, and 90-180 days for streaming
I saw it, that was Columbia’s reports on opening weekend.
James Gunn's SUPERMAN is out and it's time to talk spoilers! In this wide-ranging chat, Gunn talks everything from casting and cut scenes to the future of Superman and the entire DCU. #happysadconfused #joshhorowitz #jamesgunn #superman
To get early access to all of Josh's interviews plus bonus content, merch, and discounts to live events, go ...
Hi everyone, I have a question.
In Superman (2025), there's a scene where the Justice Gang (Green Lantern, Hawkgirl, and Mister Terrific) fights a massive, floating purple creature shaped like an eyeball with tendrils. Superman identifies it as a "dimensional imp" and matter-of-factly states that the Justice Gang has "got it handled." It doesn't look like Mister Mxyzptlk or Bat-Mite, and it doesn't seem to have their kind of reality-warping powers either.
Is this creature based on an existing DC Comics character or creature? If so, who or what is it?
this thing?
One of these
its a starro
James Gunn again says the DCU Batman will not be Robert Pattinson
︀︀
︀︀He says 'BRAVE AND THE BOLD' and any additional DCU Batman movies will not release the same calendar year as Matt Reeves' Batman movies
︀︀
︀︀(via: @joshuahorowitz)
Brave and the Bold may be 2028
would offend people nowadays.
you can just say it would offend "soft men, and weak women"
i wouldnt say people
cause im a people
but im not soft either
Oh yeah I was wondering that and left it without giving a 2nd thought
You know, I think there really is something to be said for Lex to be able to look Superman in the eye, as in, they're the same height
one does not get to be more imposing than the other just by how tall they are
I don't think it is based on any specific character.. it is just an inter dimensional imp
No.. he's talking about in Superman.. when Lois and Clark talk and there's some creature outside
Superman & Krypto INART 1/6 Scale Action Figure Unboxing and Full Review!
INART: https://global.inart.studio/products/superman-2025-sixth-collectible-figure
For more videos stay tuned! Feel free to check out the social links below for hints at upcoming videos and more!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/justinscollection/
Instagram: https:/...
This looks so good
A budding relationship gets in the way of dogged journalism in this scene from “Superman.”
The film’s screenwriter and director, James Gunn, narrates the sequence in the above video, which involves a conversation between Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) and Superman, a.k.a. Clark Kent (David Corenswet) in Lois’s apartment. The two are datin...
Would love a directors commentary of the movie
Very rarely does a single line of dialogue carry as much weight - within the text and without - as the best line in James Gunn’s Superman.
“Maybe that’s the real punk rock.”
In this video, I outline why the line matters so much, what it means for Superman’s past, present, and future, and break down its cultural implications.
Check ...
great breakdown of the line
DOAKES
Cultured ^
a lot of people are going to feel very silly in a few years when brave and the bold comes out and it isnt pattinson
James Gunn on a recent interview confirms that the Jor el and Lara message is real..
He also talks about some of the big debates he had while making the movie
Gunn also confirms that DCU Batman is gonna be different and two different Batman movies won't come out on same year
Gunn talks about Cavill and having to tell him that he is no longer Superman
Really interesting interview overall
I don’t think Cavill will join DCU after what happened. The Rock being the main culprit was obvious.
He also wanted to portray Black Adam more as a hero and have him fight Superman. He even refused to appear in Shazam 2 because he didn’t want to play the villain.
Cast someone who can act well. Alan Ritchson is a terrible actor and wouldn’t be a good Batman.
Need more directors on Happy, Sad and Confused
this man
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSBvgJ5dD/ awww pure joy
I wouldn't say terrible.. He's good in Reacher TV show, I agree he won't be a good Batman in DCU
But Gunn had nothing to do with this and if it is a good role, I think Cavill will take it. He's a actor after all.
He can’t act lol
Have you watched Reacher?
I wouldn’t say he does good acting in Reacher.
I wouldn't say he is terrible in Reacher
Yes. He doesn’t act.
It’s an action heavy role
That’s it
He does what is needed in the role alright.
Batman is a character with depth. He just doesn’t have the acting ability required for the role.
I agree that he wouldn't fit Batman in DCU and yes he has to improve quite a bit.. I wouldn't go so far as to say he's a terrible actor
Doesn’t mean Cavill will join DCU. I think dude probably doesn’t want to associate himself with DC after what happened. Superman to another role would be a downgrade.
Not right now I agree but later, who knows and a lot of actors don't think that way. It's just a role for them. Jason Mamoa didn't think Lobo would be a downgrade from Aqua man.
Cavil is not really doing so well at the box office himself so i wouldn’t be surprised if he joins mcu or dcu
Jason Momoa should’ve always been cast as Lobo lol
Well the role isn't always available though.. he was a good Aqua man imo
Pretty sure Gunn said he doesn’t mind having Cavill and Gadot in DCU. He’s just saying that to be diplomatic.
He wouldn’t say the opposite, would he?
I can see him join MCU.
Or he can play Hyperion
Yeah, he was not bad. Made the character popular amongst general audience.
Ngl I don’t fw comic but absolute Batman looks super tempting, the artwork looks fucking great. Maybe Gunn will make a movie down the road based on absolute
Do you collect?
Hot Toys is outta my scale I only collect 1:12
- it’s pretty expensive
Absolute Batman is a great comic series.
I don’t know about live action adaptation, but maybe animation?
SHF has already made there product announcement too. Gimme a sec
Oh yeah animation would be great to bring that to life.
Yes they did
Oh no I don't.. too expensive for me but I like looking at them
I think this might be Gunn's first big hero franchise movie to not have a title card that appears behind the characters
GUY GARDNER'S CREATIVITY #shorts #superman #supermanshorts #superman2025 #jamesgunnsuperman
.
.
.
.
.
Subscribe to watch all the Audience Reactions.
#audiencereactions #reactions #mcureactions #marvelreactions #theaterreactions #guygardner
James Gunn’s #Superman has now joined the Letterboxd One Million Watched Club 🪐 @Superman
︀︀
︀︀The film is now the fastest world premiere to reach one million.
Oh ok
Looks cool tho
that still only amounts to like 20 million bucks.
if movie tickets are 20 bucks and a million people have seen it
Not everyone who sees movies uses letterboxd lmao
This is a good point
so i guess they dont need to advertise, then.
@golden frost okay buddy this might be a huge plot twist from me but why this one is heavily political 
Because politics are a part of Superman stories
You heard me
I’m very undecided
Batman v Superman was also political
Superman is a very political character
Man of Steel wasn’t this political
Because it wasn’t supposed to be
It was a new Superman origin movie
Woow
Well hes a very political character but not every director taps into that as much
Superman saves people from all countries. Best policy ever.
Were any of the Christopher Reeve movies political
His origin is also directly relevant to one of the biggest controversies today
He’s from another planet
4 was, to an extent
I’m seeing the reason why is not grossing money that much like JW Rebirth
STOP IT DONT DO IT THE PEOPLE
he said that in superman 2 as wel.
He is after all immigrant, which has ALWAYS been a main part of the character
That’s right
Immigrant comes in and becomes a hero of the world. Of course people will have a problem with that
People need to shut up about the immigrant stuff like being an immigrant is a bad thing
I think could work better
Man Of Steel itself was literally a fucking immigrant story ffs
it isnt, but the prez is trying to prove otherwise.
How many post credits has guys?
Got it
The thing now in these days using stuff like that on movies is now very but very complicated knowing real life situations
That should be a good thing is brave to represent them in a big movie
I hope this doesn’t cause a controversy 
Okayyy just finish
Oh my god is like between 3.5 or 4/5 I can’t decide
The thing is that I not gonna give it a heart ❤️ because…….. it has its moments but I was really expecting more you guys know what I mean
More punching and less talking
Synder made man of steel hella religious
What 😭
There was loads of imagery in man of steel related to a monotheistic religion 🧐
And also dbz
😁
Most accurate deception on the character but you know my taste Karma 😅
I really like that for sure once I watch it
If I was a filmmaker definitely I’ll use anime action style for my movies
lol i quit watching DBZ cause of this mofo
Okay is 3.5/5
Classic
I think is a draw
Superman — MoS
Both 3.5
Come on!!!! @golden frost those were post credits OH MY GOD
Did you see Isabella Merced player hawkgirl?
Just like you I give them an equal rating, mine are just higher
Mate you can spoil here lol
I keep forgetting that 😂
Ooo yay
Is a hard one like really hard to choose
I simply don’t choose
I choose 3 of them
1978, 2013, and 2025
Simple easy answer
This is sweet.. Jack is the voice actor of Superman for My Adventures of superman
I simply choose Not Superman Returns if that helps
Idk which one did better with entertainment values
Praying it hits 500
But even now, it's not a flop right?
It’s not a flop relax
It doesn’t need to be smash hit at the box office
It just needs to make some good profit
This new regime is not money hungry like the last one
This new regime is not greedy with competing with and catching up to Marvel
It’s their own thing
DC is separating theirselves from Marvel
In the best way possible imo
It’s trying to do way more than the mcu, more genres
But I’ve always been a marvel guy so it’s hard rooting for dc
But I just hope both franchises get better and succeed over this next decade
DC has a chance now cos people getting tired of Marvel slop
I hope F4 is a new start for the MCU
To focus on great filmmaking than typical MCU stuff
And after the universe gets rebooted hopefully, I think they should go a more comic book accurate route
And more bright and colorful films like fantastic four first steps
You think? Because I really see why is not getting enough money
Wdym
Mate since 2016, we’ve been mostly long past the era of CBMs that feel nothing like CBMs
I’m guessing people were expecting more action and intensity because on my screening a lot of people weren’t that happy
Wow, really? Did you talk to any of them
Even the post credits scenes were disappointed
What did they say
What you want me to said
“Man this is what we wait for? Come on Warner Bros gives us more!!!”
Ngl I was expecting superman to fly around the earth so fast that he goes back in time to 1066
Good thing I not a comic book nerd because I would be very disappointed
I was expecting Superman to snap a neck 
A bit of more style over substance won’t hurt
Post credits dont necessarily need to be setup tho
“Save us Superman”
“I will, just hold on, I need a good shot for the wallpaper”
I agree but come on did I really need to wait for that 
So they just wanted 2 hours of punching with no story 😭
General audience is cooked
None of the post credits are gonna be setups for Gunn someone said
I am general audience
Maybe Chrome had a point earlier today
So you think I have a horrible taste 
It wouldn’t be just you according to him
Every non movie critic is stupid apparently
Is what Superhero action are right?
Story and character dev is needed!
Wouldn't you be bored by 2 hours of action with no story?
I am phrasing that genuinely, curious
Treating him like Jesus the biggest mistake
From Snyder
Like he made his whole character just a comparison to Jesus
I mean
Superman being linked to Jesus is a part of the character
It’s just that Snyder was not subtle at all about it 
i always thought that DC characters were close to gods compared to Marvel characters
@daring trench I got a request
about?
Rewatch the Snyder trilogy
But
Keep a count on Superman T posing
I’m sure the count is big
Is he the one?
That’s not specific to Snyder
Superman was always a stand in to a Godlike being in DC comics.
In this case it’s Jesus, which is what Joe Shuster and Jerry Siegel intended. He’s supposed to be an otherworldly being who protects humanity, which is similar to Lord Ram from Hinduism, Jesus Christ from Christianity etc.
Gunn completely dismissed Superman’s Kryptonian heritage and made it seem like migrating to the U.S. is the best thing imaginable. Superman shouldn’t be ashamed of his native culture.
Portraying Jor-El and Lara Lor-Van as evil conquerors was a poor choice. Jor-El was just as pivotal as Clark’s human parents in instilling good morals in him. There’s a reason Clark often turned to his holographic father for guidance in the comics, and in earlier adaptations as well.
Once again, it’s just Snyder is not subtle about it all it’s kinda funny in a way
Snyder isn’t subtle about anything. Even his best work, Watchmen, couldn’t capture the complexity of the comic book.
He takes pride in his lack of subtlety I think
(This isn't the comics)
🤞🏾🤞🏾 Alan is look maxed we need him.
2482 likes, 18 comments. “James Gunn reveals a really dark scene of Lex Luthor that he cut very early in the process. Via @joshuahorowitz”
Ts woulda been so tough
Subscribe to Food Network UK for more great clips: https://goo.gl/j1XN9a
Came for the tea, stayed for the chaos. Join David Corenswet (Superman), Rachel Brosnahan (Lois Lane), and Nicholas Hoult (Lex Luthor) for a very giggly afternoon tea.
#Superman #LookUp
🇬🇧 Catch full episodes of your favourite #FoodNetwork shows on discovery+: https...
just a bit of silliness
On the stage at Trilith shooting the barrel roll through the mountains. All the plates were shot previously in Svalbard. 7.26.24
Oh so now being not accurate to comics is excusable
@echo kraken is solid but…… just heavy political
Verdict: 7.5/10; under James Gunn direction manage to capture the source material charming tone, nostalgia and the sense of hope — Superman is a comic book character driven visually colorful with a strong message that restarts a franchise that needed a return to form even if deserved a little bit of “style over substance” with intensity an...
Superman Henry Cavill Announcement. Why James Gunn said he's bringing Henry Cavill back in future DC Movies. New Character Explained, James Gunn vs The Rock Black Adam Drama Explained, The Flash, New Justice League & Henry Cavill Warhammer Trailer ► https://bit.ly/AwesomeSubscribe
Superman Every Easter Egg & Reference https://www.youtube.com/w...
Did Superman break the law?? In this week’s episode of Doug Defends, real-life defense attorney Doug Ridley tackles the biggest box office hero of the summer…James Gunn’s Superman! But is the Man of Steel a hero or a criminal defendant?
Topics covered include:
- Superman’s kidnapping of a foreign leader
- Whether Superman actually has...
I watched the whole thing, interesting stuff
Has anyone actually read all star Superman. I did, wanted to try and understand what was the way they try to portray this Superman.
Always was
Except when Zack Snyder is in charge 😁
Who ever cared about that
I just watch the films
I dont read comics
So
Who cares
EVERY SINGLE COMIC NERD ON THIS PLANET 😭
Kinda silly
Are filmmakers not allowed to have creative input then?
Thats lame
not from me
EXACTLY
theyre wrong and dumb
But… remember how civil war, and infinity war was 1-1… marvel has always done amazing job doing 1-1 adaptions. They never deviate from the comics one bit. 🧐
Pretty sure Gunn was bragging about comic accuracy
It’s so lame
I’ll never understand the obsession with having one version of everything forever
Why shouldn’t these symbolic characters be interpreted by different artists in different ways
This clown https://fxtwitter.com/everythingdcu_/status/1946999910114709641?s=46&t=_AWFhpIAIwbUeGd6RdGh0A
James Gunn on Jor El and Lara
︀︀
︀︀“I don’t really even think of Jor-El and Lara as being totally evil. They just have this mindset that humans are less than what they are. We’re sea turtles to them. They’re just trying to keep the Kryptonian genes alive.”
︀︀
︀︀(Via @RollingStone )
God forbid someone have an idea that contradicts Issue #493 of The Sensational Superman as written by some guy
Wrong.
You’re just wrong dude lmfao
If you think thag Superman is a dumb punchy character, you have a limited understanding as to who this character is.
While I understand Superman fights he also does this
Dude I not a comic book nerd

And this
Just a passionate action and horror fan
Then don’t make statements like “it’s more accurate to the character”
When you don’t know what you’re talking about
Go watch death battle then .
I feel like it needed more of that personal perspective of saving than just “saving the world”
Corenswet's Superman personally saved multiple people lol
Not like save from danger. More like save from themselves.
ah
maybe we'll get that later on
his last scene with Lex was kinda like that though
it didnt work because Lex is a petty asshole but he at least tried to save him
He was. There was a conversation about it. But then kyrpto…
That’s why that ending speech didn’t click with me. Cause yeah, human and I save. But gardner does the same thing but for glory and admiration. Does that make him human or just showing off.
Terrific does the same thing but it’s behind the scenes cause he’s a tech hero. Does that mean he just doesn’t want to be glorified as a hero because he already knows how to save.
He lived among the people for what 3 years but didn’t show how he relates to them. Feeling isn’t relatability, it’s understanding.
The Justice Gang wasn’t needed. Superman could’ve easily done the job solo
The only moment I saw that he really cared about the people was in the interview with Lois
That’s what I’m saying.
Mr Terrific was a cool character, but this is a Superman movie.
The inclusion of JSA or Justice Gang makes Clark look like a chump.
I wanted to see Superman do Superman things as a hero. Not only by the form of powers and fighting, also as a person who cares about the small things
I couldn’t stand Guy Gardner tbh. Never liked the character in the comics and he’s more annoying in the film.
Superman lowkey should have heat visioned Gardner.
He save a squirrel, cool. But it was a wild squirrel. It’s like those videos when people save a stray cat from a high place, you save it and runs away.
Big woop
Everyone leaves
I think a solo battle between Superman vs Kaiju would’ve been more interesting.
For sure. I really didn’t like that he didn’t fight that one monster because the gang got it.
Like wtf. You’re afraid of public criticism so you don’t fight even the easiest monsters
they were good characters in the movie so its good
KRYPTO'S UNRULY BEHAVIOR REASON IS SUPERGIRL #shorts #superman #superman2025
.
.
.
.
.
Subscribe to watch all the Audience Reactions.
#audiencereactions #reactions #mcureactions #marvelreactions #theaterreactions
See this was fine. But like you cause destruction here but not while fighting the gaint lizard.
If I was Superman, I would’ve been pissed lol. People beneath me trying to take credit
i wonder if we'll see krypto again in supergirl after this unless the movie is set before or something😭
he doesnt see other people as "beneath him"
thats not how superman is 😂
They have too. For the merch
Krypto will be in it for sure
so when Flag said there wasn't any kryptonite left on the planet, what we thinking?
Clark himself get rid of it?
Probably a top 5 frame in the film for me
This is how you know the people in charge actually give a shit about Superman and the themes that are paramount to his character.
I am so excited for the memes that will result from the Lex 1A moment
Batman does this stuff too. He isnt just a mere ass kicker.
at least Conroy batman did
Movie is a different medium than comics and it is an adaptation.. You don't need to do 100% of what was in comics .. Marvel never did that too
No but I have watched the animated movie based on the comics and it was really good
DC animation roster is strong, and a great reference for live action adaptations.
It doesn’t have to be
Kinda shocked this scene didn't trigger the Indians
?
I agree with this take to be honest.
That person wasn’t an Indian lol. Why do you think he was?
What are you even saying?? Guy Gardner is a human with a Lantern ring.. Superman is a alien from another planet and he's saying I am like everyone else as well.. totally different thing
Guy doesn't have to prove to anyone he's a human.. Superman does
It was also to counter Luthor because he hated Superman due to his alien heritage
Luthor hated Superman because he was better than him in every way and he was jealous, not just because of his alien heritage.
He stole his thunder and his ego couldn’t handle that.
I liked it cause of what Lex did with him. It was a full circle moment.
It made sense. Luthor giving his profound speech, and krypto jumping in as a victim of his hypocrisy.
How was Superman better than Luthor?? It was because of Superman being kryptonian and the most powerful metahuman. If Superman was just Clark Kent with no powers.. Luthor wouldn't care about him.
Take away Luthor’s intelligence, and he would be irrelevant. Your logic is pretty silly.
I don't even get what you are saying. Luthor literally says Superman is a It because of his alien heritage alright..
Luthor doesn’t specifically hate Superman because he’s an alien. It has more to do with the fact Superman stole his thunder. His xenophobia is a secondary aspect.
Luthor has said he hates all metahumans.. that's in the movie btw and for Luthor, Superman is better than him and beloved by many because he's a alien who has fantastical powers.
Luthor is already a multi billionaire in the movie, he already thinks he's the greatest human on Earth.. Superman threatens his ego.
The alien thing is his excuse. Do you actually think Lex cares about humanity?
Ya but he isn't going after Justice gang.. is he ?
Because he can beat the Justice Gang lol. Superman is vastly superior to them and also Lex.
That's his main thing.. Luthor hates Superman even more than other metahumans because he's alien.
Don't know how many times you have watched the movie.. I've watched it 2 times and that's my takeaway.. you disagree, that's fine.
If you think Lex Luthor is the equivalent of a Nazi or KKK, then you don’t get the character. He mainly hates Superman because he’s better loved and also the more powerful man. The alien thing is more of an excuse.
He portrays himself as a saviour of humanity, which is all an act.
Watch the movie again. If Lex hated Kryptonians so much, then he wouldn’t create a clone of Superman.
Agree to disagree then, imo.. Luthor hates Superman even more and one big reason for that is because he's an alien.
No that’s not really the main reason. It has more to do with the fact he’s jealous of Superman’s abilities and the admiration he got.
What ?? Lex created that clone to defeat and kill Superman..
Justice gang have also gotten admiration quite a bit.. Lex isn't focused on them.
I'm sure there are other metahumans as well in DCU but Lex is laser focused on Superman.. when Flag says to Lex, so you want to imprison all metahumans.. Lex says no, Superman is different
Where did Superman's abilities come from??
Precisely. If Lex actually hated aliens, he wouldn’t dare do something like that. Again let me reiterate, Lex hates Superman because he’s jealous. It’s not specifically that he hates his race, which is more of an excuse to portray himself as a saviour of humanity and he wanted to convince the public that Superman should not be trusted because he’s from another world.
That was all an act
That clone isn't alien.. it was created by Lex in a lab.. same with Kaiju and Mr. Handsome
That clone was created by taking Superman’s DNA
So?? It is just a mindless clone, one of his experiments and he hates Superman so much he created that clone.. not because he has no problems with aliens
If he hated Kryptonians so much, Lex wouldn’t do that. In fact, Lex himself in the comics have gained Kryptonian abilities.
You don’t get the character. You’re just spewing nonsense without realising why he hates
Lex hates Superman alright, and one main reason is because Superman is alien and because of that he has gained abilities that are superior to that of Lex
Even you said, Lex hates Superman abilities.. well, tell where did those abilities come from?
Lex just hate people who pose as a threat to him. He barely gives a shit about humanity or even aliens.
The entire “I’m a saviour of humanity and aliens pose as a threat” stuff is an act
Well, agree to disagree then
He doesn’t mainly hate Superman due to his Kryptonian heritage. He’s just mad that Superman is naturally more powerful than him and Lex had to work hard to become successful. It doesn’t have to do with Superman coming from Krypton, which was more of an act by Lex to convince the public he’s a threat who is up to no good.
So, Lex doesn't resent the fact that Superman got his powers and abilities because he was born in Krypton?? Like that doesn't concern him at all?
Yeah… Lex hates anyone that’s an obstacle to him. Even other evil people. And funny enough he likes Clark Kent more.
Maybe try reading some comics to better understand the character. I used to think the same way, until I actually read the books.
Movies and comics are different mediums alright.. I don't need to read comics to form my own interpretation of the character and btw Gunn has already deviated hugely from comics regarding Jor el
I used to think Lex hated Superman due to his alien heritage, but if you actually read the comics, then you’ll realise that’s just an act. Lex has gained powers from aliens before and it didn’t bother him at all.
He literally falsified a war just to have the opportunity to justify of killing Superman.
Even in the movie, Lex doesn’t exactly specifically hate Superman due to his alien heritage. You’re just being ignorant IMO.
Of course but he's hyper focused on Superman though.. and not other meta humans.
He shows his disdain for Superman by calling him It in the movie.. now what does that tell you??
Well yeah that’s what I’m saying. Even having the parents message just guarantees city hatred to Superman
No no.. why is Lex hyper focused on Superman, so much so that he falsified a war, he spent 3 years making a clone, learning 2500 fight moves?? There are other meta humans too.
Calling him “It” just to belittle him doesn’t mean Lex is obsessed with Superman’s alien race. This is the same guy who used Superman’s kryptonian DNA to create a clone. He wouldn’t do that if he hated aliens that much. Like I said, he just hates everybody who is a threat to him.
He literally says he made a war just to have the opportunity to kill Superman
Yes but why focus on just Superman ?? He's just one hero out of many.. there's Justice gang and probably others
Because Superman specifically stole his thunder and is the saviour of Metropolis and the world in general. Other metahumans aren’t stopping Lex.
Cause at least for the justice gang they play by the rules but Superman doesn’t because all he sees is about saving people
Other metahumans also do not pose a threat to Lex like Superman does.
How did Superman stole Lex's thunder?? By saving people ?? Justice gang are saving people too.
It’s literally in the movie. Superman is described as the most powerful metahuman, and it’s not surprising Lex hates somebody who is more powerful than him. That’s his characteristic.
What did Superman do to steal Lex's thunder?? Like, we are never told Superman did this or that to stop Lex before.
Justice gang isn’t more powerful than Lex. This guy created people like Engineer and also a Superman clone.
Superman gets power from the sun and a super being. Lantern gets power from the ring. Hawk girl just flies and Mr terrific is just good with tech. Within the movies eyes and even our irl eyes, Superman is godlike. Of course he is the main threat
So, Lex believes Superman is more powerful than him and that is stealing Lex's thunder ?
Superman is the guy who he’s truly afraid of. Lex knows that he’s more powerful than him and whatever he can do.
Yes. Superman stopped a war that Lex was profiting off of because he created the war to win half of the land so he can rule
OK but then Lex should also know why is Superman so powerful than him while he can take of other metahumans right?
Because Superman is more powerful than other metahumans lol and Lex couldn’t stop him. Whereas, clearly Lex can stop the others.
No .. that war was engineered by Lex to bait Superman into acting so that he can say to US govt.. Superman is a threat and needs to be taken care of.
Yes.. Superman is more powerful than others because he's from Krypton. Lex knows that.
He literally said he was guaranteed half of the land for Lex to rule
Lex created Ultraman and Engineer to take care of Superman, and even that didn’t work out. It just shows that Superman is the guy he can’t beat. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?
That was all a ruse and Lex says it later..
It was all a profit gain because he sold weapons to them during the war
I agree that Lex believes Superman is more powerful than him and hence he's a threat.. but I also believe that Lex knows Superman is that way because he's an alien and that's another main factor behind his hatred towards Superman imo.
I swear we watched a different movie and you just focused on the woosh woosh
Again, it has barely to do with his race and has much more to do with jealousy . Lex just doesn’t like that Superman is better than him. If Justice Gang had members that could pose a threat, then Lex would’ve treated them similarly.
You need to watch the movie again.. Lex later clarifies that the war was started so that Superman will take the bait and help these people creating a international crisis.. and sure if at the end, he also gets half of Jahranpur that's fine but that's not the main reason.
Lex is way too smart to actually be like Hitler. He’s the smartest man in the world. Do you actually think he’s obsessed with race?
You have fundamentally misunderstood the character
Let's disagree then. Lex knows Superman is powerful than him because of the fact that he is alien and that is one source of hatred towards Superman.
This has more to do with jealousy than some race obsession.
He’s literally a genius level scientist.
I never said that Lex is obsessed with Kryptonians .. I am only saying part of the reason why Lex hates Superman and him being more powerful is because Superman is an alien.. that's all.
Would you think if Superman wasn’t an alien but was still powerful, would he still hate him?
Yes but the hatred wouldn't be as huge as in this movie where Lex says Superman is a It..
You literally said he only hates Superman because he’s an alien. You’re implying that he’s some hardcore racist like Hitler who’s fanatically obsessed with the concept of race. I told you he hates Superman because he’s a jealous prick.
I said a big reason that Lex hates Superman is because he's an alien and due to that Superman gained huge powers and he's jealous of that.
You know Lex literally gives Superman cancer in all star Superman because he knew he would save people from danger in a sun mission
Jealousy and envy is absolutely a huge motivation for Lex and he says in the movie himself.
If Lex actually hated Superman for being an alien, then he wouldn’t even create a clone taking the Kryptonian DNA from Superman. He clearly doesn’t give a shit about race. It’s all about power and money for the dude. Then someone like Superman popped up in Metropolis saving people and Lex couldn’t stand the fact he was more admired than himself.
I bet if Guy Gardner was a powerful threat like Superman, Lex would’ve made sure that dude is dead.
Again, part of the reason I said.. and it's a clone of Superman that Lex created to defeat Superman. I doubt Lex even considers that clone a alien.
He created that other chick too that’ have more alien like powers but considers her as a tool
Yes, to defeat Superman because he hates Superman that much
Dude took alien DNA to create a clone. Why would some who hates aliens do that? Lex is way too smart to be obsessed with something like race. He’s a genius level scientist.
Lex hates Superman who's also a alien and considers him threat to the humanity itself..
The only reason “alien” has been thrown around is probably cause current political views are thinking that.
Lex doesn’t give two shit about humanity. This is the same guy who casually killed an innocent man for nothing.
So alien means stranger from the world in our eyes
send a kryptonian to kill a kryptonian.
Lex only used that as a propaganda. That Superman is an alien conqueror who’s a threat to humanity, even though that’s not true.
Well that message is true though.. Gunn confirmed it
If anything there is more evidence that Lex is a threat to humanity and he doesn’t give two shit about other people.
Lex do be egotistical
The message is true, but clearly Superman isn’t a conqueror, is he? He cares more about humanity than Lex. In fact, he’s more human than Lex.
I agree with that
Dude grew up in a family farm.
That’s more human than anything
The unfortunate part is that due to the message, mass opinion goes against Superman, so now super has to show the people he’s not his parents or his tradition
Yes he does.. that's why he sends Kal el to Earth
And also says to Superman to basically expand genetic pool of Kryptonians
so in all fairness, why wouldnt he encourage his son to repopulate?
he the last one
Jor-El in DCU is like Zod.
This is true but to rule and be a literal god over the humans. It’s very different from its long lasting origins of Superman
Yeah, it’s such a dumb decision.
I mean, fair question I will say. Of course in comics that's not the case and Gunn has said that not every Kryptonian shares the world view of Jor el too.
Such an unoriginal change.
I think it works well for this movie
Jor-el was kind of a douche in smallville too.
It fits the “aliens are conqueror” sci fi cliche. This change is one of the main reason, it isn’t a good movie IMO.
I think it absolutely makes sense for a advanced alien civilization to try to conquer smaller civilisations like Earth..
That was AI Jor-El. Not the real one
Yall should read absolute Superman. That shit is amazing and Superman is still considered young
I think this change with Jor el was absolutely the right decision for this movie and I will be interested in what happens next like did Supergirl parents have the same opinion as well??
better believe that's what the US would do if they found a planet of inferior civilization level.
Yes, but Kryptonians aren’t exactly conquerors or violent bunch of people aside like Zod and his cronies. The change is silly and very cliche.
Of course because that’s how use real people think of what real aliens might do if they have try to do the same to us
That’s our definition of alien
It has happened throughout human history..
Gunn lied that he read comics and then end up doing shit like this. Probably skimmed some pages.
Well, maybe the Kryptonians are different in DCU
Yup...
Dude that’s what I thought about after I read all star Superman. I’m like where the hell is this Superman in the movie lol.
He’s no different from Zack Snyder tbh. Both don’t give a crap about source material.
If anything he’s trying to build another universe than making an awesome singular hero film
Just because you dont like something doesent mean everyone shouldnt. Thats the point of an opinion.
I like this change by Gunn, it fits the story and also it makes sure that Superman is good despite his Kryptonian heritage and at the end he kinda renounces his biological parents in favor of human parents
And I’m giving an opinion. I don’t think Gunn read any comics and he has stated previously they’re garbage.
We will know more about Kryptonians in general in supergirl
That’s unfortunately true but with years of source material, making a tweak in storylines especially in film is a tough act to start on.
well, the guys who wanted to do the Kevin smith superman movie read even less.
Gunn has read more comics than you alright.. and apart from that one change, the rest of the movie is very comic book accurate
I really don’t care about that. The point is Gunn portrayed himself as some comic book guru, and then made this change, which is baffling.
covers alot of ground too.
I don't know why people don't get that movies and comics are totally different mediums and sometimes for a good story, you need to change stuff from the comics.
He just setup characters, didn’t setup the world
Yeah, sure lol. I’m not arguing who read more comics.
I'm absolutely fine with that.. vast majority of people who watch superhero movies never read the comics anyway
Batman and robin will probably be a more setup to the world than this film
Jor-el is like a minor character that you can mold however you want. Its superman that needs to be the good guy, not Jor el
If he actually cared about the source material, which he pretend to do so publicly, then yeah maybe people can criticise about comic book accuracy. His fanboys defend him for the change.
What are you talking about?? There was a lot of worldbuilding in this movie.. from metahumans appearing 300 years ago, to Justice society mural.. among others
Absolutely.. Jor el is just not a huge character
Jor-El isn’t a minor character. In fact, his hologram provides guidance to Superman whenever things get difficult.
and he did. just not the guidance you want him to have
Superman’s Kryptonian heritage is equally as important to his humanity. You clearly know nothing about the character because you just watched one movie.
Not in DCU
besides, clark looks to his earth dad just as much.
Which is why I said read the comics or even watch the previous movies. In both Donner’s Superman and Snyder’s MOS, Jor-El provided guidance to Clark and what’s his purpose.
Pretty sure jor el didnt say a damn thing in Red Son
Superman (1978) 3 Hour TV Version
Superman talks to Jor-El
Superman (1978) Playlist: https://goo.gl/2GLNaN
Film description: Just before the destruction of the planet Krypton, scientist Jor-El sends his infant son Kal-El on a spaceship to Earth. Raised by kindly farmers Jonathan and Martha Kent, young Clark discovers the source of his superhuma...
Superman isn’t even an alien in Red Son and that’s more of an Elseworld story.
yes he is, he landed in soviet russia
This is a different take on Superman, which focuses more on his humanity than his alien heritage and I'm okay with that.
James Gunn said Superman(1978) was his main inspiration, yet the change he made was the complete opposite of what was stated in the film. He’s a liar.
What ?? Superman didn't land in Soviet Russia from krypton in Red son??
you can be inspired by something and make a different take of it.
Absolutely
yes he did.
Inspiration isn't the same as copying everything
So what is Don saying about Superman not being an alien in Red son?
You clearly didn’t read Red Son or watched the movie. Superman is an evolved human from future civilisation who was sent back in time.
He’s not a Kryptonian
i think he confusing with something else.
He’s an evolved human
Yeah like wtf why didn’t Pa Kent die in this film if 1978 Superman was his main inspiration
That’s literally the twist in Red Son. Superman was an evolved human from a far future civilisation on a doomed Earth, who was sent back in time.
See? Russia
I've watched the Red son animated movie alright..
The premise literally is what if Superman ship crash lands in communist Russia instead of Kansas..
You are confusing with something else
Yes
Yoooooooo that’s cool
I keep procrastinating the film version
Watch Red son animated movie.. it is good
I shall try
better believe its real too.
Read the freakin book lol. Superman is an evolved human from a future civilisation on a doomed Earth. Dude was sent back in time. Earth is just ancient Krypton in the Red Son universe. Superman’s parents in Red Son are Lex’s descendants.
I’m not confusing with anything. You clearly didn’t read or even watch the animated movie.
No you are wrong and confusing it with some other comic and I've watched the animated movie as well.
Nothing like that happens .
then what the heck am i looking at?
Read the premise
Read the freakin book lol. I believe the animated movie changed that aspect.
Ok, wait I’ll post the panel.
wow, dude really holding on to this
Ask anybody who read the comic, they’ll you the same thing. It was a twist
pretty sure if i ask about red son they go "oh, russian superman"
I have only watched the animated movie and that wasn't in that..
Ask anybody who read the comic and they’ll tell you he was an evolved human sent back in time by Jor-L. The last issue shows that it creates a paradox, where it makes Superman a descendant of Luthor and Lois.
What you're describing is from this.
Basically, billions of years in the future in Red Son universe, Earth is doomed due to the sun becoming a red giant. Jor-L sends Kal-L back in time, which creates a predestination paradox.
Maybe thats in the comics and I haven't read it, I can only say that it wasn't in the animated movie.
I’ll post the panel. Wait
and i'll research that panel.
This is the twist. Red Son Superman basically came from the future. Dude comes from future Earth, which is doomed.
I need to rewatch the movie. I guess they didn’t include this twist.
I gotta read red son
Cool concept
Sometimes animated changes the visuals from comic
it shows the pod landing in ukraine in 1938
Holy shit, you clearly can’t read.
No you clearly can’t read.
Red Son Superman comes from future Earth and he’s sent back in time. Like, read.
“I gave them firm substantiated evidence that the Earth is on the brink of collapsing into our own sun”
No they didn't.. that's why I was confused
I only watched the Red son animated movie and that scene wasn't in the movie.. didn't know comics had a different ending later
they do send an infant back in time, it at least its implied
It’s not implied. That’s directly stated in the panel.
That ending is a bit confusing though.. Good thing they didn't have it in the movie
“Do we have to send him really so far back”
So what came first, skynet or John connor, type of deal
It's basically a paradox.. Don is right here, this is in the comics
Agreed.
Sorry.
Sure, just shows many of us don't read comics.. I had watched the animated movie and it wasn't there
avoid animated killing joke. it is the cringe.
I've watched it too and it wasn't good I agree
Ya
I have forgotten about the movie tbh
anywho, back to the Gunn
Agree with this..
This is a good start for Superman and DCU.. mainly due to audience and critics reception
i just hope they stick with this for awhile rather than reboot in 5 years.
I think they will.. 2 more years is guaranteed like Supergirl next year and the Clayface in 2027 maybe.. you would need a string of flops to change direction
That's long way off I think
pff they killed cavil on his second movie.
I don't think they will even think about killing and then reviving Superman for a very long time
We need to get a Justice league movie before that
Same.. DCU Batman is gonna be interesting and how it contrasts with Reeves Batman as well
A little late for that due to age
I also don't think we will get DCU Joker for some time..
how old was he when he redid goblin?
He was around 66.. he's 69 now
But he can't be early 70s
right, i suppose.
who would you want as joker if you could chose?
Bill Skarsgard maybe. He played a killer clown before.
or maybe the terrifier dude
Clayface rn is slated for late 2026
Something about secret invasion
What's with the Snyder hate?
So that was 9 days ago
Honestly I don't have anyone in mind at the moment.. we have had so many jokers, 3 at least including Heath Ledger Joker. And DCU Batman has to be very distinctive as well.
Quitely’s art is so distinctive
I think people are tired of the Joker. Besides, we might get a solo Joker TV show set in Reevesverse.
They should start with fantastical villains in Brave and Bold. Joker can be introduced much later.
If The Brave and the Bold ever gets made, they should include villains like Poison Ivy. She’s an interesting character and a powerful opponent.
Nobody is tired of anything, including Joker and “superhero fatigue”… people are tired of shit story and stupid characterizations. You can push things through with amazing production scale and action only so far before the audience become aware of the tricks. Gunn works within the comic book logic intersect now well established in the normal movie goers, which is why it’s like “no longer a trick” and felt “authentic and sincere”.
https://youtube.com/shorts/UOALSBSIzOE?si=zlKJTZhKZmA5prjH
https://youtube.com/shorts/UOALSBSIzOE?si=zlKJTZhKZmA5prjH
I think he did one for guy as well.
I would love more superhero manga stuff. #supermanshorts #dccomics #dcuniverse #film #movie #movies #films #short #shorts #mangaedit
These are so tough
Artwork done by Manabu Yashiro
I do agree that as Gunn said recently there's no superhero movie fatigue, there's just mediocre movie fatigue but we have had just too many Joker iterations already and DCU Batman needs to start with a different, more fantastical rogues gallery like Poison ivy maybe or others.
James Gunn says ‘SUPERGIRL’ is an edgier & rougher movie than ‘SUPERMAN’
︀︀
︀︀“Supergirl is a way more rock & roll film. It’s a little bit rougher, in certain ways. She’s a tougher character. She’s not Superman at all”
︀︀
︀︀(Source: www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-features/superman-ending-explained-james-gunn-spoiler-interview-1235389024/))
Old news, if it’s based on Woman Of Tomorrow, she’d be crazy with survivor guilt.
It is based on woman of tomorrow comics
Where she goes around drunk across the universe seeking revenge for someone ELSE hehe
God her boots rocks
Yup.. Superman mentions that in the movie itself
He just say that she likes to get drunk (due to survivor's guilt), but not the near murderous rampage because ||she felt sorry about someone else's planet got blown up|| lol
That will be explored in the movie for sure
Milly Alcock is such a great casting for a young, JUST LEGAL DRINKING AGE (according to USA, anyways) Supergirl...
She can do cute AND crazy so well.
Very much "Looks like a cinnamon roll, will kill you" vibe
She looks great in the role
Supergirl is already in the can, wrapped in May. The first internal assembly cut should've already been done... they would be going into pickup and reshoots in the next couple of months I think, since they have to picture lock the whole film down for sound, music and image post (VFX) probably no later than October if they want to make the Late June release date.
Gunn definitely runs a tight ship.
Totally agree... and the Krypto sequence was hilarious
Yes it was
Pounce, pounce, pounce pounce...
[Supergirl giggling while the floor of the Fortress of Solitude gets destroyed]
I don't think I've seen any of the 3 Kryptonian characters (well one of them is a Kryptonian dog) being done with so much humanity (and flaws, in a good way) before... Gunn knows how to do flaws
Totally agree with this
Is 54% a big drop for a second weekend
Not really, kinda normal.
It's kinda pretty much as expected, maybe slightly stronger.
A TRUELY bad movie willl have a crazy drop.
For a recent example of a WoM destroying a film, here's Snow White
What was the % drop
77% from opening Friday to 2nd Friday heh
77% damn 😭
Saturday and Sunday did slightly better than Friday, but it's still slightly over 60% and 57% drops.
Drop % only make sense when you have MASSIVE numbers to check it against though... notice that yes the 57% drop doesn't look TOO bad, but the fluctuations is WILD, because the BASE of the opening weekend are in 16, 15, and 10 millions... with opening cume of only 42mil.
And third weekend is in the single digit millions.
So the AMOUNT also provide half of the picture here.
If you look at what we have for Superman (Snow White is in a wrap-up/debriefing state, while Superman is in active tracking)
The numbers are comparatively MASSIVE, so a 53% drop STILL allowed it to be the number 1 film on every single day.
I suspect it'll remain there until FF comes out... the BIG question is, once FF comes out, would Superman get a second leg or not.
Not impossible, but improbably, unless everyone HATED FF.
@golden frost
What was MoS second weekend drop
I think MoS was a massive hit, iirc... and it was a TOTALLY different time
actually, not great lol... 65% drop weekend 1 to 2 lol
And in a time when there wasn't massive streaming and vod following up, and everyone had to wait for bluray/dvd if you want to wait... which is like 90-180 days....
Yeah... suffice to say that it's super bad lol
65? I thought it was just 62
Also didn’t Spider-Man Homecoming have a 62% second weekend drop
There's a summer push for the Aug 9th weekend it seems, for MoS, that's about it... when you can't even stay number 1 for 2 weeks....
I do know the film had very strong reactions
It still made about 3.0x the production budget, so it's still a relative success
I’m not sure 65% is that big of a drop tho but anyway
Plus the movie also did get cooked by some competition
A fun family movie like Despicable Me 2 was going to get more attention
It isn't THESE days.. because if you've missed the opening, the though for a lot of people is like "it'll be 2-3 weeks before VOD anyways, I'll be nice and buy it then... 1 ticket vs one for each of my family member"... but back in 2013, that's a CRAZY drop
Was it a big drop in 2017
It would be in 2017, though slightly less. After the Pandemic, anything below 70% isn't super bad... it's bad, but not "OMFG!!!!"
So what can we say about Spider-Man Homecoming facing a 62% drop
Both MoS and Black Adam are in the same range in matrices, that's scary
Wdym?
2.50 "Legs", meaning a relatively short run with low takes
Low takes?
It's just 2nd weekend, and Superman is already 1.89 "legs"
Per screening tickets sold.
Are second weekend drops always an indicator of reception
Gauge?
What does the higher number mean
Like a quick look... for instance, the 62% drop for Homecoming LOOKS bad, until you realized that the Per Theater (pre screen) take remained at above a $1000 per screen for nearly 3 months.
What about for 2014 Godzilla which had a 66% second weekend drop
Higher the "legs" the longer the run, the slower the drop vs biggest weekend... it's another composite number.
Anything above 2.6 is considered "well received", while anything below are not. And it's somewhat exponential, so the lower you go from 2.6, each 0.01 is a lot more loss than each 0.01 is gained after 2.6.
Donno, I'll need to look at other matrices... gimme a sec
What’s the case with Superman having 1.89
Any chance this can be translated for my primitive mind
See from this, as it's now a FULL status (meaning done with initial release)... you can quickly see that it had a REALLY short run, with a MASSIVE take on opening weekend, with a quick dropoff, but still made money because the movie costs so little.
Summary, for a film that had completed the Box Office run, is quite accurate
Wait what did you say about Spider-Man Homecoming
Nothing, it's not done it's run... that matrix is only really valuable (unless you get into the other matrices) once the run is done...
Big opening, long run, a the theater made money, the movie also made money.... a LOT of money.
But healthy, since the domestic share is below 50%.
It's a really healthy film, but a bit on the low side
What about X Men Dofp facing a big drop in 2014 in second weekend with 64%
See for Spiderman the range is still fine, but a bit low
https://youtu.be/B-wEkHVHtQY?si=2nFKTaeQ4uBytrbt
oh man birdman Superman grift review dropped 👀
Truth, Justice and the Immigrant Way.
===IF YOU'D LIKE TO FOLLOW ME===
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Th3birdman15 @Th3Birdman15
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/Th3Birdman15/
Discord: nQZRn5m
Subreddit: https://Reddit.com/r/Th3Birdman
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Th3Birdman15
Subscribe: https:...
Stop pulling films out, we've got MORE than enough examples, and we should frame it only in relations to Superman
So what can we conclude about MoS
I’m not sure it can be placed in the super bad category
Minor success... way below expectations for 2013.
Not enough to start a cinematic universe, and therefore the pressures are on BvS...
Is it even possible to conclude if reception was more on the positive or negative side
Why did they start one anyway 😭
That's really hard without doing some mathing that I'm way too lazy to do right now... but let's just say that on quick gut-instict, the MIDDLE "That's an ok film, but I won't be rewatching it in theaters" crowd is going to be VERY high... so something like 15:70:15 love -> like -> hate ratio.
Which is weird cos it has a fine score on lb, an A- cinemascore, a 7.1 on IMDb
Anyway
Reviews arn't really well represented on the box office matrices... the domestic curves will tell a main overperform/underperform picture and the effect of WoM... not the quality of the film or whether people like it or not. Like (sorry to draw another film into the discussion) The Beekeeper VASTLY overperformed... and while not like for like with it being a 1999 film... The Matrix thrived on WoM.
The Beekeeper
The Matrix
The issue is that the matrices and box office analysis doesn't really account for marketing pushes and crazy strategies they used to do (less now, but still there) of pushing a shit film super hard, and making all the money back on opening weekend, then cut the film's run short as the WoM hits... for instance.
Basically, the easiest way to think the box office not as quite the quality of a film, unless it over-performs or under-performs on expectations, but more a combined result of marketing, cast, director, other draws. The likeability of a film and the WoM are usually tied, but that's also not always related to the quality.
Most films REAL scores won't really be considered "realiable" to the audience appreciations for at least 2-3 years after the film had come out. That's when the film can be judged on "cultural longevity" and therefore "quality".
I think that box office quality argument can be forever killed when Michael Bay’s Transformers Age Of Extinction makes a billion dollars
Despite extremely low scores
Yeah, and when was the LAST time you hear people re-streaming THAT film outside of being part of a series or marathon, here?
Nearly none.
Big box office can be an indicator on the brand's viability and how good a ride (specifically for summer blockbusters) it is... that film fits the bill on delivering a mindless fun ride that is made to sell popcorn... nothing more, nothing less.
I can never trust audiences sometimes ugh
I never trust anyone other than myself on how much a movie can be liked .... I TRY to think of how others will receive it, but my enjoyment is my own... My wife often sleeps on films even slightly boring in theaters (reclining chairs in cinemas are great), so that's pretty reliable for me on what the NORMAL audience would think...
Like... Blade Runner 2049, I don't think she's ever finished that film... at least 45min of the runtime she's asleep lol
Like MoS underperforms yet Michael Bay slop makes a billion? Get the fuck out of here
Snyderbros knows exactly what kind of films they want from him, and he delivers to that... Baybros are the same.
There's just way more Baybros than Snyderbros, that's all.
At least Michael Bay is self aware about it
There's also the Nolanbros, and the DelToroBros etc etc
I honestly appreciate that sometimes there are more fans of the directors than of the films lol
A LOT of people jumped on the bandwagon on "Release the Snyder Cut!" movement... and the fact that it was a successful campaign, bolstered their resolve AND gained them some numbers too.
It's interesting, I just wished they aren't so toxic towards everyone else.
Not all of them are toxic
No, but due to the fact that the smallest and the most toxic will be the most vocal, it'll feel like they ALL are, obviously.

