#Superman
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
They're gonna have to promote the hell outta this shit.
Honestly in my opinion, Matt Reeves Batman, while I love it, is gonna be a burden.
I know that it's just that with her being a complete mess how the hell IS she Supergirl
why does she have a hero costume?
Next June is pretty much the same, time flies fast asf
Mhm, thanks. AFAIK, it's made clear that this version of Superman is a solar battery like the ones in modern comics, so, with that in mind, it makes sense to fully envelop him in nanites in order to reduce his intake of solar energy. According to this view, he was trying to get more solar energy by going into space (presumably the solar energy would counteract the nanite suffocation), which is why the Engineer completely enveloped him. What's still unclear to me is why she couldn't disengage before they crashed.
Hope the next movie builds on them more because their death would not be impactful right now
Having them die in 3rd might make the most sense
Love this type of worldbuilding
Wish we got the full paper.. some of those headlines are interesting
@craggy pawn I'm not confident that Superman's primary motivation for flying upward was to increase his exposure to solar energy, but from Luthor's POV, it made sense to decrease his exposure in order to help get him under control, since (despite having him at disadvantage) they did not have him fully under control during most of his upward flight and were concerned about where he was going. The tactic backfired, but with Luthor clearly not having foreseen that, his order to the Engineer made sense in the moment (and I see no other explanation for him wanting Superman fully enveloped).
Do you agree?
I think Luther did believe that if Engineer would cover all of Superman in nanites then Superman would be subdued but of course it backfired at the end..
Again, what was Superman thinking when he went above, I'm not sure.. he had to do something and felt this was the only way out.
Mhm. Moreover, it is mentioned that Supes might be trying to use friction to remove the nanites. That being the case up is his only open direction that won't crash into anything.
Or perhaps they don’t need to die.
I agree, they don't need to, at least not anytime soon
James Gunn’s ‘SUPERMAN’ earned $3M more this weekend than expected, taking its worldwide opening total to $220M
Budget was $225M
Read our review: https://t.co/3sWy8gsNCU
I have another question.
In Superman (2025), Lex Luthor's pocket universe features a tall naked creature with elongated fingers that operates the platform shuttling people to and from prison cells. Towering over Lex and sporting an unsettling appearance, this being is dubbed "Mr. Handsome" by Lex.
Does "Mr. Handsome" originate from DC Comics as a known creature or alien species, and if so, what is it?
I don't think this Mr. Handsome character is from comics, at first I was wondering if it was white Martian but clearly not
mr handsome is an original character yeah
Any references?
Would nanites be able to damage Kryptonian physiology
and a show, and cartoon
It’s not too bad, if it was 4 live action shows that would be overstuffing, but two animated shows is nice.
well you gotta remember, this isnt dcu, this is all of dc
so that includes things like the harley quinn show and teen titans go etc etc
I'm feeling nostalgia for Superman & Lois all of a sudden.
I really hope Corenswet evolves into a version with personality closer to Hoechelins interpretation.
The heart of Superman in that show made it worth watching. I think this version will get there
Hoechelins personality is the type I can see being a central figure of the JL
i could definitely see him growing into the more wise and stoic version of the character over the next decade
Highly underrated superman. Cause of the budget cuts.
"Hey buddy. Eyes up here." - Superman This is how you do Superman. This was an enjoyable time! I was worried that all the characters in this world would be too much and make things chaotic. But it wasn't. You know the personalities of all the characters for the short or long time they are on the screen, and it all worked. I especially loved Mr. ...
Provided to YouTube by WaterTower Music
Who I Was Meant to Be · Dan Romer
Superman & Lois: Season 1 (Original Television Soundtrack)
℗ 2021 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Producer: Dan Romer
Composer: Dan Romer
Auto-generated by YouTube.
There’s one particular moment in the film where he emulated that to perfection
When Luthor’s crimes have finally been exposed and he’s defeated, he sees Superman with his arms crossed looking at him with that disappointed look
That was perfect
Sure
What if that wasn’t Jor El and Lara in the message
What if they were Zod and a love interest of his impersonating them
I heard that theory as well, while I don't think that's gonna happen it's a interesting theory
I doubt it personally
Wouldnt that undermine this film thematically
At least a bit
Yup.. I still think Gunn won't go back and retcon this because its a huge plot point in the movie
He was raised well
thats what i've been saying
it would completely undermine the message of this movie and invalidate all of superman's character development if the message was just randomly revealed to be fake
Either way it will piss off a lot of fans
I'm just gonna assume that Supergirl is Kara Zor-El and not a pink slime creature taking her form created by a pocket dimension Lex Luthor called Matrix
Why's it Kara zor-el and cal-el
i've never thought about that actually
It goes against the integrity of the character lol https://fxtwitter.com/ign/status/1944889335616074103?s=46&t=_AWFhpIAIwbUeGd6RdGh0A
James Gunn explains why he changed [SPOILER] for Superman's birth parents! #Superman
they're ressurecting batgirl and wile e coyote? no? fuck em.
I don't think it would, cause the lesson from this movie will still be a factor on the way Superman has formed in the world. The nature vs nurture message will still be here everytime people re-visit this movie. It will make the Superman movie interesting as a different phase of his life.
Regardless of whether the matter is resolved later or not.
But that's only how I see it.
What do you mean?
Oh hmm maybe Kara Zor is her name perhaps
It doesnt
It actually strengthens that integrity
Yeah i really like that change tbj
acme vs coyote did actually get saved, its coming out next year
zor-el was her father's name if i'm not mistaken.
It took me a bit to get behind it but after a few minutes I liked it
Which Kent will survive Superman Gunn trilogy
5
8
3
Both survive
I was a little skeptical of the creative choice at first, but now it feels like a great story potential. Still not a fan of the Kryptonian getup tho.
Sybau 💔
I swear these political social media influencers always piss me off
They blab about wanting escapism
No matter how many people love them their opinions r always outrageous and I can never align myself with them because its always stupid
😭
THATS EXACTLY WHAT THIS MOVIE IS
Exactly
And the form of escapsim that Superman provides is also advocacy
You will get your money’s worth with Superman
It's telling us to literally stand up for whats right
You’re going in to watch a fun movie and escape with the family
Exactly
A bright colorful movie
Inspiring me to recolor Man Of Steel in an editing software to see what I can do
Her twin ben shaprio
Everytime he makes a movie review
I sit down in disappointment
Like I honestly wanna know how his brain functions
Syfm 💔
My honest reaction to his review
I remember seeing that on my instagram and just wanted to die
Anyway I might show you my recolor of the MoS first flight
OH YES
My fav scene from the film
I think I did pretty well with it
MoS was actually the first superhero movie I watched as a kid
In theatres**
IN THEATRES
Just to emphasise
Idk what the first superhero movie I watched was overall
Prob Sam Raimi's spidey
This 2025 one is the first standalone Superman movie I saw in theaters
Guessing u weren't a big superman fan before?
HitFilm
The process was complicated for sure because of how MoS is color graded especially on the suit that was the biggest challenge
Speaking of colour grading dark to light tones
Justice League did it horribly
And it was so evident
Joss Whedon 💔
Eewwww
With MoS it was shot using high contrast lighting same with the other Snyder movies
Like keep in mind my father who doesn't really care about these small details and for film in general
Noticed immediantly
Thats how bad justice league colour grading was
😭
And plus it comes down to the camera choices
The field of view as well
Zack Snyder most likely used a 35 mm camera I think
There’s a diminishing return after 100mil but releasing is not just marketing budgets. The whole distribution and stuff is like a form of “buy-in” from the distro and theater chains, so even if they didn’t spend double the budget they would’ve had other way to fill in their “half”.
Ik it was confirmed that gunn used a red komodo for the handheld shots
I don't remember where I saw it
But I know I saw it somewhere
The close up of the face here doesn’t receive the goofy criticism
Less noticeable tbh, plain background, wind effects
Less hard to notice on the first watch
Also in 2013 ppl didnt care 😭
Nowadays one mishap in vfx everyone starts dying
I’ve noticed that with Zack Snyder’s color grading he has a certain goal
With Superman shots specifically
i was 100% on board immediately and thought it was brilliant
He wants to use two specific color palettes
First one is the red of course on the cape and S shield
Especially the cape
it was a unique twist that only strengthens superman and reinforces his character
The evil jor-el and lara plotline?
It works for this movie
The s shield pisses me off
Its so dull
for marketing you can pretty much estimate that its equal to the movie's budget, up to $100M
Makes us more thankful to the Kents
The yellow looks off white in some scenes
yes
If Gunn really wants to go back on it, he can say Brainiac corrupted it or something
Is fine for now
I 100% agree
i wouldnt say theyre evil though
We should be thanking Christ that Superman was raised by the Kents
A loving family living on a farm in a small town
superman and iron giant are even more similar now
"He finds it soothing" and it was a compilation of ma and pa kent 😢
bro was purposely sent to a weak planet with the sole purpose of ruling, and chose to become the best of its people
if that isnt the most superman thing ever then idk what is
Ruling a planet against their will sounds evil to me 😭
Everyday you should be thanking the fuck out of the Kents
It's around 100 million dollars in marketing yes
but to them, earth is so extremely inferior that they truly believe kal-el would be benefiting them by ruling
The chances that he landed in the field of literal saints
im not saying theyre right
1/100000000
but i dont think theyre some scheming villains
Okay I see your point, they're trying to do the best for their child
Any parent would want that
exactly
they sent him to the place they thought he would prosper the most
their idea of prospering is just way different then clark's idea of it lol
Yeah and it's not like they know earth like clark does
I know people take issue with MoS Jonathan Kent but I am still convinced he always wanted his son to be the best he can be
yeah earth is just a dot on a map to them
With a yellow Sun
Kryptonians are a super race after all
That is evil
Yes, but that’s because it’s the way they had that rig they perfected for Guardians 3, which requires a compact lens that can move between 3 focal length and a compact camera. It was literally built around them, hence almost had to use the Komodo and Leica Tri-Elmer lens to be the most effective.
its misguided more than anything
Also what a shot this is
You don’t notice the parallels with Boravia? Him stopping Boravia is his direct way of acting against the morals of his parents and Krypton
Chefs kiss
The luck of that message not being able to fully be completed
Where Superman only hears the first part
im not saying its right, they are absolutely in the wrong
Is Boravia evil
i wouldnt say its evil but what it was doing wasnt right
lex is evil though
maybe the boravian president was evil because he was working with lex
Looks better in the actual movie
Come on.. they also said Superman should take multiple wives and increase the gene pool so as to create a bunch of kryptonians to rule alongside him.. that's not misguided
I'm so glad gunn used it on guardians 3 because it gave enough time for his crew to experiment with it before Superman and it turned out great
ok maybe theyre a little evil lol
Trying to invade another country and take over is not evil..interesting
I love Gunn's new dynamic style with the wide lens shots
I honestly think MoS could’ve looked even better visually with brighter colors
Where was this in GOTG 1 and 2 😢
Absolutely it is.. invading a defenseless Country and killing its people and remember their President talked about spilling blood of Jahranpurians
i have to believe you're intentionally ragebaiting here
Gotg 1 is still James Gunn’s best tho
My personal favorite cosmic space adventure movie
I actually am not. You don’t think thats evil?
Icl my favourite James Gunn project is Peacemaker
Some films, like Wicked, spent more, but it’s basically them leveraging the marketing for part 2 on part 1. And yeah, while it has diminishing returns after 100mil, a lot of times it depends on the distribution contracts, and the “matching the budget” had to be filled in somewhere. That’s why Disney had a bit of an advantage because they can manipulate the contract to be less than that, as they are all themselves.
I fucking love that show
when i say "evil" i mean like villainous, like a supervillain
obviously boravia is a bad country doing a very bad thing
i guess evil would be a way to describe it, i was just thinking of the word in a different context
If I strictly had to choose a James Gunn movie a very controversial opinion but I'm gonna say Suicide Squad
Not a huge a guardians fan
Evil is unredeemable
Don't get me started on Super 💔
then yeah boravia is evil
Oh for sure
Killing innocents is unredeemable...
I think more accurate is to say, Boravian leadership is evil
i just think its a matter of intention, the boravian president had malicious intention whereas i dont know if jor-el did
Exactly
I think forcefully colonising a country against their will is a very evil thing
Thats undeniable man
Not even I think
It is 😭
I think, outside of the Mr Terrific sequence with Lane at the portal camp, where the use of that felt a bit forced, the whole film also used the rig way more subtlety than Guardians, and that comes with familiarity too.
If that message is true he was very clear on the message.. it is to basically rule Earth as last son of Krypton
its like asking if thanos is evil, what he is doing is wrong but it comes from a place of wanting the best for the universe
Yeah I agree with the subtle nature of its utilisation
yeah i guess wanting to rule another planet with an iron fist is pretty cut and dry
It wasn't very subtle with the adam warlock sequence
Of course for Jor el.. that's not evil, maybe he doesn't want Superman to be last krypton
its like, back in the 1700s was everyone in america who owned a slave evil? obviously slavery is a horrible thing, but when its the societal norm and the only way of life you have ever known, are you an evil person for participating?
Yeah
good intention --> unethical execution
They used way more physical and cgi enhancements on the flying shots to add weights and movements to Superman… it’s again, like Gunn was prepping for Superman on Guardians 3 lol
Exactly lmaoooo
yeah he talked about how they used cgi to make superman's hair blow in the wind
Yeah I agree with the fact the flight scenes had more weight to them
in that adam warlock shot his hair doesnt move a millimeter
obviously slavery is an evil thing
Guardians 3 adam warlock just felt like a feather shooting through space
you just have to think about the context of clark's parents being from a planet with vastly different rules and norms than earth
The new rig makes it seem like the wind is resisting and theres weight to the scene
clearly colonization is an evil thing, but its not crazy to imagine that jor-el didnt have nefarious intention
Also I've had this question for a while and there's no definitive answer because it is james gunna and no one would know
Will any of the black adam casting stick?
no
In particular I'm talking about Atom Smasher
If you looked at the shots of him flying, there are way more than just hair, it was subtle, but I love the details in those shots. Invisible CGI has gotten real good of late, and he used them near perfectly on Superman
Noah Centineo was great
I'm sure with a performance like his Gunn would be happy to have him back
its super impressive, people complain about cgi but dont even realize its there 99% of the time
His cheeks were pulling back a bit if u paid close attention
I think this depends on one’s belief in objective vs subjective wrongs.
I hope noah centineo stays as atom smasher
They sold on Pierce Brosnan as Dr Fate 💔
Perfect casting wasted on black adam
Nice job guys
i think we can acknowledge that is is objectively wrong but also recognize that if someone is raised their entire life to believe its not wrong then they arent necessarily an evil person for doing it
Yup, and apparently that bothered Gunn after it was done… I assume he’s done a lot of self-debriefing and put the learning to the prep and planning of Superman lol… using Disney money to perfect himself is funny and great lol
Love love love
Thats who gunn is, reflection and improvement
james gunn fixed his eye in that one shot snyder bros were complaining about lol
Makes me happy, as I said, that part of Superman R&D was effectively on Disney Dime hehe
How can u be a good filmmaker if you dont fix your mistakes
james gunn is a very reactionary filmmaker, which can be a good thing and a bad thing
Heh, “beardless Superman” existed
he's always taking immediate feedback and trying to incorporate it as promptly as possible, but sometimes you need to be able to stick to a vision
in the case of superman i dont think he overdid it, people were worried he would take social media criticisms to much to heart and change the movie too much because of them but he clearly didnt
Nolan improved on emotional storytelling via oppenheimer
Taika Watiti and to tone down his wacky storytelling
Rian Johnson onto not alienate fans and try to have more emotional outlets in his films
We love directors improving on their mistakes
🤌
I'm so happy in Next Goal Wins, Taika still kept that wacky and goofy charm he has in his films but was still able to embrace those essential messages about love, acceptance and embracing urself
Lost it a bit in love and thunder but we back
He said that he wouldn’t have known how to add depth to the character in that way if he didn’t experience that almost career breaking sets of events. Now that’s a real filmmaker… you roll with the punches and use even negative experiences to strengthen your work
A trait for any good filmmaker… QT said it’s “really hard to make a bad film, if you put that much love behind something”
He overdid it a little for Mr Terrific, but I have a very few small minor gripes for the film, and none of them impacted the overall film… he really achieved a near “have your cake and eat it” levels of perfect balance on Superman.
Exactlyyy
Anyways I shall be leaving chat good talk 🙏
Revision calls 
Love and Thunder was forced to cut too short… people thought none of the jokes landed because they were stretched, but it’s not that case imo. The reasons that they didn’t work was because Taika’s humor rests on “initial cringe, then pause, then realizing it’s funny”… the film needed 20min of “audience time” which was forced to be cut by the Disney for runtime, and Taika was to ADHD to really want to go back and fix it later, and that’s not really something Marvel does anyways…
The message was also lost in translation
Writing something’s hard, editing and improvement is even harder haha
Jane's cancer storyline was really good
Like I thought that was a strong point in the movie
Should've had more emphasis and impact
But big man feige always has his stupid demands
My belief, is that opposite to normal audience argument, is that the movie needed to be longer…. Probably not the most popular opinion lol
DONT YOU DISRESPECT GODDAMN MR TERRIFIC
And those stupid demands also stopped us from seeing something like Scott Derrickson's doctor strange sequel
I am never forgiving feige for that
i agree completely
I just think Taika needed more control, the runtime was fine in my opinion but certain storylines needed to be cut back in order to focus on jane and thor
all of my criticisms of the movie could have been fixed if it was like ten minutes longer
Jane and thor should've been the centerpiece
lol I love the character, but I mean, the character’s charm is that he’s low-key extra lol
Not lowkey like the kids say, but subtly extra lol
Tell me about it im writing revision notes for one of my subject's
Anyways like I said before goodbye y'all 🫡
there are rumors that they cut like 30 minutes out of the movie to make it less of a comedy and streamline the story more
Love and Thunder?
i would love to see a directors cut with those extra 30 minutes if its real
superman
I think I’ll agree with it honestly… since Gunn didn’t rely on studio feedback, but got a lot of his friends and other filmmakers (yes even Snyder) on it instead, so those 30min probably were affecting the tone and feel too much. I wouldn’t be surprised if those 30min were just a LOT of 4-5sec trims
i think 30 minutes is excessive, but i think a couple more "transition" scenes would have been nice
Not sure director’s cut, but I’d definitely be curious on them as some kind of extra.
like the kaiju fight starts so suddenly, if there had been like a 30 second scene of someone finding it in the morning at like 7 feet tall and then showing the kaiju start to walk downtown while growing, that would have been better
I mean, it’s not like a QT style “8 hours script, 6 hours assembly, 2.5 hours film” levels trim lol
as opposed to just having someone on the news say "they found it this morning and it was 7 feet tall and then it grew" after the fight was over
I like that it’s a payoff to “oh it’ll grow” tho lol
this movie has quite a bit of telling instead of showing, which i understand is necessary because they were setting up an entire new universe
but i think some of it could have been shown or just not told
these are small criticisms though
gotta stress that i really liked the movie
Like I’m sure the actual Interdimensional Imp fight had some Justice Gang fights filmed, and trimming them down and focusing on Supe and Lane is probably one of the trims.
Same, I have some minor gripes, but I voice them because I can’t find anything major personally, so it sounds like I’m more annoyed by them than I really am lol
Most of the expositional dialogue were handled correctly, as “in character”… so it’s done in ways where one character requests the information and the other explains it. Expositions are not inherently bad, as long as they are not outright mansplaining, like the red sun thing with drunk supergirl. Like, the Superman-bots would’ve known that without Superman explaining it to them. That’s purely for the audience. Again, minor gripes.
one of my biggest dialogue gripes in general is:
if two characters are talking, and they both know a piece of information
I am particularly impressed by the Lois/Clark dialogues, they both spent a lot of time speaking in subtext, opposite to what they really mean, which is so real.
then one character would never say that information to the other
it just feels super unnatural
lois and clark had a fantastic dynamic in this movie
Right, and the film’s dialogues were mostly in advancement of the conversations, that’s ultra impressive.
yeah the red sun comment is the only time this movie suffers from that
because general audiences wont question why a kryptonian is drunk
I know I bring the example up often but “I knew this would never work” meaning “I want this to work so much” is like, pure genius
and big superman/supergirl fans already know about the red sun stuff
Exactly, and it could be handled in “I didn’t know kryptonians could get drunk”, “she goes planet hopping around red suns so she could”, “ah right”
Instead of a block of expositional monologue lol
What if Superman was exposed to a blue sun
depowered.
Wait really
DEAD!!!!
dont ask what happens if he's exposed to a pink sun...
technically its pink kryptonite
makes him gay
this is canon btw
there is genuinely a pink kryptonite in the comics that makes superman gay
there's worse things in life
Yeah a Superman who chooses humanity over god hood.
Ure kidding
He’s not, but it’s a comic only one that is basically a satire of the random Kytonite and their random effects in Silver Age… it was depicted to with turn you gay or switch your gender hehe
the only other time this happens in the movie is when guy gardner explains the hypno glasses to lois, but that works because he is supposed to be an idiot and she points out that he shouldnt be telling her about them
That one worked because of the character dynamics
Hi everyone. I have a question.
In Superman (2025), there's a scene where Superman Robot #4 plays a recorded holographic message from Superman's biological parents, Jor-El and Lara, to soothe Superman while he's healing. We hear them speaking in their native Kryptonian language, with Superman Robot #4 providing an English translation.
The Kryptonian dialogue sounds like a real European language. I'm curious whether the filmmakers actually used a real-world language for the Kryptonian dialogue, and if so, which one? Or is it perhaps a constructed language created for the film?
To me the dialogue sounded like Arabic
Superman kind of felt like a kids movie
It wasn't terrible, it was Okay
but I didn't emotionally connect with any character
There are a few dialogues that are unnecessary
yes that was good
same
Like Lex Luthor not checking his gf's entire browser history
he could have easily known she told about the pocket dimension
Do people generally really like this movie
I don't know
I only feel it was okay
Idk why I didn’t like it much
Same, I expected more
Same
this was the same guy that narrowed down the guy who interacted with superman twice
and then how did he not consider the dog would join the fight?
and the speech in the end superman gives, it's kind of unnatural, the point he makes perhaps is correct but
it shouldn't have been told by himself
'my advantage is'
exactly
he's smart because we're told so
Is lobo supposed to be the supergirl villain
And Superman saying 'brain beats brawn' 😭
how is that brain
letting his dog join fight
wasn't that a given

why wouldn't Lex be expecting that
Oooooo
Couldn’t he have just put a damn camera on the superman clone as well
I wish the jokes were toned down a lil
didn;t emotionally connect with any character
yeah
bro can make pocket dimensions
can't do that
Ikr
Supergirl seem weird also
Is there a proper post credit
Superman had more potential
I didn’t wait for it in the cinema
one is superman and krypto on moon, 2 seconds
and another is superman commenting on
the walls joining after the blackhole
he said it wasn't perfect
Oh ok
Idk maybe I wanted to see more superman fighting or idk
to open blackhole
I’m a very casual movie watcher
same, even Man of Steel had more action scenes
I think it's valid
I don’t get why the justice guys randomly stepped in
the action scenes were underwhelming
To stop the invasion
yeah, they were funded by something, right?
Something corp?
yes
corporate only I think
and the characters in Justice Gang had nothing unqiue on them
Like Mr. Terrific was a helpful dude but that's all
Yes
Tbh I would have preferred if it focused more on Superman
and his inner struggles
Exactly
I wanted less of the other people we were shown
What dc movie is next in this
mmm I don't know the next
but supergirl, batman the brave and bold
not sure if any of them began shooting
Supergirl then clay face apparently
if all films are like this, I'm not gonna be invested
oh yes
clay face
this film actually felt like click bait
all youtubers were hyping it like it was the best thing ever
sigh
I saw high review rating
And thought this would be amazing considering it can’t fail
it had emotions, we connected with Cyborg's arc etc
Same
It was like a formula used to get people in theatres
the marketing plan
I haven’t watched any of the dc shows
I watched a bit of Creature Commandos, wasn't bad
but there were better stuff to watch
Ye idk what that is
Just the Suicide Squad but with monster kinda meta humans
but an animated series so there's more time to develop
Ok
imma scroll and see what others thought
yeah Jason Momoa is a good actor
even in this film, the cast were good
just the storyline :|
plot too predictable obv
I hope fantastic 4 isn’t trash at least
yeah let's see
I'll be happy if it's good
Don't wanna see superhero genre like this
Invincible comics was the only last good thing I saw
TDK trilogy, Sam Raimi films
Anyways ima go now
Man, I should have expected this
but GOTG you had emotional connections with the team
it just didn't work here
and still it had a lot of comedy.
And then people complained about the fixed one too
I mean he was pretty generic
his whole character
Batman films do make more money I think yeah
Could you expand on this?
Yeah David was a good superman
I would have preferred more time inside Luthor's head but it maybe just me
I agree with you there isn't any emotional connection here like GOTG films
there were unnecessaary diaolgues
Yeah I was actually disappointed to see the Ultraman reveal, since we already know
well it's a good children's film at the end of the day
they don't care about inconsistencies
well Deadshot has put superman on ICU before
and if Superman was evil, the world will unite to end him
People like Lex can clone him
Yeah it was actually good
I only watched like 1-2 seasons
But seeing Supes as a dad was nice
The Batman was a better film
I knew it the hawk girl was the same actor as Dina from tlou
He still is
The whole reason the movie happens is because of him
Every event is because of Superman
How much y’all think this movie is gonna make?
I enjoyed Superman. I guess the humor part of it might not be for everyone, but don't think that part wasn't too terrible. ||Loved The Peacemaker cameo and Mily will do great as emo Supergirl lol||
No matter the box office, this movies impact will not be denied
I truly think this movie should be a cultural reset
https://youtube.com/shorts/EbfPkXlCchw?si=3uBt23Ww7-jbEOq9
Wow these people exist
Max Lord
It was just decent. Don’t get the hype.
There are many people who compared this film with Spider-Man 1 and Batman Begins💀
Gunn fans will love this film.
spider-man 1 is definitely a good comparison for this movie, they both really embrace the comic book feel
💀
raimi films were iconic
GOTG films were better than this Superman film imo
Because we actually emotionally connected to the characters there
here nah
I gave the same rating, but I think GOTG 3 definitely had more depth.
yes
Superman is more like a children film here
not anything too terrible to watch
but just not as good as it is hyped
I have a lot of complaints
because of the way it got hyped
Atp characters in comic book movies just are the same people but with different powers.
Like Mr. Terrific his character felt so generic
he was helping supes, cool and stuff
but we only got surface level exposition
Invincible is prolly the best comic book series around right now
Mr Terrific was cool. The other Justice Gang members weren’t required.
Moist critical has the most unbiased review I have seen so far of Superman
He said when Lex played the russian roulette and killed the innocent guy, that momentum should have carried on
but instead we don't see him go low again
He was cool yeah, but there wasn't anything unique about his character, in his actions. I did like his action scenes, well it's a superman film after all
This movie was too goofy, especially the fight between Ultraman and Superman in the stadium.
yeah
Like what was that
and the fact that Lex didn't expect Krypto to join Supes??????
that is just stupid
How can anybody think this movie is much better than Spider-Man 1
exactly
when Ultraman was unmasked, it was so underwhelming
we knew it was coming
and the only point of the character was muscle
no nuances
I wish Lex did more scheming
And Supes says 'brain beats brawn' for this
like literally what
the writing made Luthor just smart because we are told so
and he can invent stuff that's all
I don’t even care about the DCU. I just hope we get more Reevesverse stuff.
actor did a good job, but a wasted potential
Same actually
I wasn't disappointed by the Batman
unlike this film
it lived the hype
the tone of the film, the characters
and music
Batmobile, Batsuit etc
It will end up the same way as DCEU from the looks of it and Gunn should’ve never been chosen to head the DC studios.
yeah -_-
If they had cut down the jokes for some emotional connections, it would have been better
I hope Tom King gets more involved.
Oooo batman author
Exactly.
I heard they already cut like 30 minutes of jokes
and it was still like this
imma rewatch TDK trilogy
to affirm myself Superhero movies can be matured
The inclusion of lame jokes during serious scenes made the whole thing seem trivial.
yes
There was tonal difference at times.
because I barely connected with any character
there wasn't much 'subtle'
you're being spoon fed with dialogues every other second
unnecessary ones too
Superman I&II were made during pre crisis era and it didn’t feel anywhere as ridiculous as this film.
yeah, this was ridiculous
nothing was dwelved in deeply
war tensions? we only hear a little about it
bad guy conquering good guy
one dimensional
Would have loved to see Clark and Lois
in the daily planet
I do wished it was like 20 minutes longer tbh
Omw to see superman for the second time
Less people this time oh no...
It has only been the second week
Probably because it's wednesday though
What is the second post credit scene of superman
I got Eve 🤣
I GOT LEX 😎😎😎
robert pattinson's batman shows up in clark's apartment and says "we need to talk"
A lot of overglazing comes from bias
You’re more obsessed with hating on this movie than people who like it
When will people realize not every superhero masterpiece needs to be “dark” or “mysterious”
Oh btw I got lex also
How is calling a movie “decent”the same as hating it?
You constantly trash on this movie in here
It doesn’t have to. That’s not the criticism
Am I? Having some criticism doesn’t mean I hate the movie.
I do agree I do think GOTG 3 is better
I think GOTG 3 is one of the most perfect superhero movies
I have mentioned the positives. Not everybody has to glaze the movie like you do.
That is true, but I do have some issues with the movie
Like I think the first 30 minutes were completely overhyped
I like it but people were acting like it was a magnum opus like The Dark Knights opening
guardians 3 is gunn's best movie
superman is top 3 for me though
I know you're lying
You see this a lot with early DC movie reactions
They hype it up to be way better than it actually is
The Flash is an example
nuh uhhhhhhhh trust bro
That is where the Batman theme was played, during that end credit scene. It was beautiful.
“I’m here to talk to you about the Justice League Initiative”
Well
Why would we lie about Batman being in the movie
It was actually so insane
During the credits scene
The whole theater went insane
Popcorn everywhere
And it said
THE BATMAN AND SUPERMAN WILL RETURN…
TOGETHER.
Then their logos were combined together
So World’s Finest is basically confirmed
We were all screaming with joy
Nice
Director James Gunn talks about why his new "Superman" film shows the hero as more vulnerable and human, and how themes like kindness, compassion and immigrant identity shaped the story.
Each weekday morning, "CBS Mornings" co-hosts Gayle King, Tony Dokoupil and Nate Burleson bring you the latest breaking news, smart conversation and in-depth f...
Pretty cool
What’s your take on the Superman movie
Funny how Superman stands for basic human kindness yet this online discourse is the opposite of that
When you make a complex fictional world, that draw on real-world inspirations, people will try to equate the inspirations as direct parallel or analogy.
It doesn't have to, but not everyone can or wants to make the cognitive dissonance.
It's the power of the medium, ultimately... if you make something immersive, people are going to treat it as true.
It’s also the case of how there are those who love this movie but cannot go for 5 seconds of glazing it without trashing another version
It's the same cognitive dissonance in my opinions... or like... supporting your local pro sports teams, you know?
It's like "I love living in THIS world, so any other alternatives are OTHER, and therefore FALSE"
I love Man Of Steel but that doesn’t mean I’m gonna bash the new one regardless of whether I like it or not
And yes I did really like this new one
Right, but it's like, there's always going to be diehard Yankees fans who will trash Mets, you know?
a certain amount of films are better when you abandon the online discourse that surrounds them
I’ve already seen people who love MoS also love this new one
there's no point in mentioning the faux right-leaning morons who debase and immediately get annoyed at movies for no reason
Yes, and some doesn't help, like... Snow White... is Snow White BETTER without online discorses and culture wars? Absolutely... is it a better movie than I thought it would be? That's also true...
But is it really WATCHABLE? Not really lol.
let these people feed off eachother on twitter and let it be
You have one side of this discourse ripping this movie apart and the other ripping the other movie apart, I can’t even escape the YT videos ripping these movies apart
I think the majority will, because they are fans of SUPERMAN... there are some who are locked into Snyder (who has himself moved-on from it already...), that are fans of the SNYDERMAN, that will be hard to twist lol.
they already got 3 movies
I just can’t stand when the MoS haters act like there’s absolutely nothing done right about the movie same for the other side
Yes I struggled immensely with the Snow White remake. I just struggle to find any meaning in the culture/online discourse it had regarding the relation to the original/Rachel Zegler stuff. It's so nothing. Talk about the film and it's qualities. I'd only really encourage the online debate if it was an intensely political film or one that was making broad leaps and statements
My big issue is that people are TOXICALLY comparing the 2 films... and it's like... WHY?
It's a different mood, it's over.
Comparing OG run of batman films (1989-2000s) with Nolan, then Matt Reeves... is a futile exercise.
Why are we comparing this new Superman with Zack Snyder’s one specifically, why not Bryan Singer’s version from 2006
becsue they have short memories
Because Snyder's Superman was the most recent and audience divided. People are more inclined to compare them when they're immensely popular anyway. Bryan Singer's Superman isn't talked about because it didn't really make an impression socially at the point.
Did we all just collectively agree that Superman Returns was just a nothing movie
Not quite the right place for that, but I'll OCD my 2 cents: "When a movie changes the rules and definition of the in-world logic 3 times before 10min mark, the film immediately (subconsciously) lost the TRUST of the audience. With a reluctant audience, you have to drag or flip them. But instead, the film doubled-down on the narrative definition confusion. This makes the audience trust the film even less, and therefore less engaged."
I like the film, but it's very vanilla
Vanilla? Meaning?
It's just okay
its solid. its good, but nothing special
there's lots to like about it, but nothing I really loved
Can we at least agree MoS is better even tho you probably weren’t big on it either?
More like, it didn’t really push anything forward, it’s a film that stands by itself… I love vanilla ice cream, but it won’t really wow me any day.
yes perfectly put
Exactly
I feel like I’m going to enjoy Superman 4 more idk
It’s brilliantly campy and stupid, but the vibes is amazing
Idk if it’s gonna be a better movie lol
But it looks more entertaining
Me? Oh no, I hated MoS. I remember liking the score though
I like Superman Returns more than Man of Steel honestly… I might not be wowed by vanilla, I HATE licorish lol
ooh, good analogy
I think Returns paid some nice homages, and it sucks that Routh never got a proper chance to play him, but some of the story choices were horrible.
Deadbeat Dad
actually, it was super cool to see Routh play him again in the Arrowverse crossover eps
I'm so buying my dogs a Krypto costume lol
heck yeah, do it
He was goodest super dog next to Cosmo from GOTG
really needs some training though
I knew he was going to pop up somewhere
I might too lol
Especially since my dog looks a lot like him
Old lady version of krypto
omgosh
What breed was this version of Krypto?
Also was that old Eastern European guy based off anybody?
I called him "Undead Phil Spector" lol
It’s objectively not a great film, but damn the vibes and the antics are peak
It’s pure camp yes?
Lord is still in his “hero” phase I guess lol
As far as 80s random goes, it’s not quite there, so a lot of people fault it for that… but as far as just referring to Golden Age and Silver Age goodie twoshoes Superman and his whacky adventures (as I said earlier, that whole period is about setting up impossible obstacles for Superman to solve absurdly), it’s right on the mark.
STOP IT DONT DO IT THE PEOPLE
Late 80s Cold War nuclear fears is part of it, hence the “Quest for Peace”
Not gonna lie, while story and execution and whatnot is vastly underwhelming in Superman 4, it might be my fav Christopher Reeves Superman film, precisely because of how stupid it is.
I mean, it sort of caused Superman V, which would've featured Brainiac to be cancelled... if it wasn't I'm sure he wouldn't have hated it that much lol
The film also basically contributed heavily to Cannon Group's bankrupsy haha
In so much as, Cannon Group hobbled along for a of decade after that, but Superman IV was the reason it all started to fall apart and changed to Cannon Inc and stuff.
The big issue isn't really with the film itself, but the budget was slashed by half, so the special effect and all the cooler things that were on the script wasn't really possible.
The film is rather bare-boned, and they had to rely on antics and stuff...
Didn’t they reuse the same flying shots of Superman multiple times
it was filmed in Milton Keynes
Oh, that's like... the least of the film's problems bwahaaha...
that tells you everything
Nuclear Man
We be having a cycle of Superman clones
That's maybe 1/4th of the issues too bwahaha
you should see the Honest Trailer for Supes 4
Superman 4: Rest in Peace
Yeah and it particularly tickled my nerd-sense by having Superman 2025 be inspired in parts on Superman 4 too bwahah
heehee I should watch it now
In 1978, Superman couldn’t get top billing in his own movie
And Marlon Brando was paid a fuckton more with barely any screen time
and kept syaing Krypton wrong
That video actually just reminds me how much I loved that dumb film bwahaha
Ok, I'm about to scroll and read some of this, but I will give you my take:
It did not exceed expectations, and those were very low to begin with.
I just -- I didn't like it, Iw asn't impressed, what were those credit scenes anyway? complete waste of time.
Credits scenes dont need to be setup imo
ie, setup for future movies?
well, to throw a marvel example out there, the scene in the first avengers when they were eating at the shwarma place didn't advance a plot but was pretty hilarious to me.
and i have a strange relationship with marvel, i've seen about a third of it
I'm not trying to throw down though
What is the consensus here?
That's very subjective, the superman post credit scenes were the same type of thing so it's up to preference
The whole thing that Gunn said is that none of the post-credits (and mid-credits) will now be served as setup for other films, but character moments.
I liked it a lot. Not in my top level of superhero movies but I really enjoyed it and can't wait for more.
I mean, I was lukewarm on guardians of the galaxy and james gunn to begin with (although I did like slither)
in fact, it was guardians being praised as one of the best marvels out there that convinced me marvel was not for me anymore, as i wasn't a fan.
so, maybe gunn's direction is just lost on me
Oh really?
It seems, at least here, about 45:30:25 love -> like -> hate the film.
I found the shwarma scene in the first avenger sto not advance the plot but I didn't feel it wasted y time to sit there. I thought it was funny.
like, they were all so exhausted, and just eating. i didn't get that kind fo connection in the superman o nes
i'm goign to try to be more deep than just, "I didn't like it."
I understand that gunn said it's not an origin story, but there was no stated motivation
what exactly was luthor's again? that superman's heroism highlighted how base humanity was so he had to destroy him?
i mean wtf
Yup, he thinks it didn't work for the sigularity of the films (his whole thing is that each film should at least be able to stand on its own), and is what Marvel did wrong, an a bit of cheaty.
I see
is this superman the start of a new phase of dc, or is it comletely a slice of life?
oh wait, there's supergirl coming
Fair
i just watched milly alcock in sirens.
I don't think you understood that the film is about DEEP FEAR of the OTHER... no matter how much good or bad or whatever the person is or are...
so luthor is the embodiment of the deep fear that humanity has of otherness, especially that of "good" ?
and the ability for that sentiment of humanity to lash out
Luthor is deeply about showing off his own intellect and growing his powers, and Superman makes humanity "weak" in his mind, and as a member of humanity, he cannot allow that... circular logic, that because he thinks he's the pinnicle of humanity, that he has to go against him.
Not of good, PURELY of the OTHERNESS.
WTF? It's pretty much on screen, lol
no, i'm seriously trying ot understand, please dno't belittle me.
The entire last exchange between Superman and Lex Luthor is about that
And the fight between Ultraman (unmasked) and Superman
This version of Lex Luthor wasn't shy about his motivations or anger
the final scene where luthor was in his battle station getting his ass kicked?
or was there another one, feel free to remind me
before that
the conversation before that
Before he got dog-handled by Krypto trying to double down, yes hehe
Superman is about the BEAUTY of HUMANITY, even if he really isn't one... he thinks he is one, and is trying to fit in, and do good.
Lex is basically repeating "You can't do this to us, you're not HUMAN"
do what to us?
impose his morality?
and then that's how the manipulation of the video message comes in?
ANYTHING, you can't be more powerful than us, you can't decide what we do, you're an ALIEN
It's not manipulated, it's recovered, but it may be argued that it's imperfectly restored, as in, there could still be pieces missing.
I dunno. Maybe I just got dumbed down but stuff like Black Widow. I mean, I saw it in the theater to support scarlett johansson, but the motivations in that weren't exactly subtle.
or dr.strange
neither of which had a plot to speak of.
maybe i should rewatch it?
Idon't think I"m that invested though. i didn't like it like i loved free guy and wanted to watch it multiple times.
This film is actually incredibly subtle, despite being very plain on the surface.
I think outside of the Guardians films, and the Favreau Iron Man films, ... maybe the Russos films, none of the other Marvel films are as subtextual
well, that's what i'm saying.
i'm.... just not buying it. i feel like it's a stretch. maybe i look for the scene in which he's talking about his motivations and yelling int he cockpit again?
or was there a thing where they communicated directly. idon't remember.
It's not your fault, it's just how Gunn likes to run things... it'll get a while to use to it I think... and it's just the first film, so we don't even really know if that'll be where it'll stay...
He's gonna be letting other directors get at them too, so we don't know really anything other than what this film shows.
where's ana propriate place to discuss james gunn's work? or is it probably ok here. like, not deep dive, just -- i mean, i've seen slither, i've seen guardians...
and i was really, really not impressed with guardians.
i just got.... confused. i probablyshould have rewathced it instead of dismissing it.
Lex Luthor and Superman had a conversation a few times, each time he basically argues a version of "You're JUST an alien, you're an IT, not a HUMAN... you have no rights, go away"
i spaced out when they explained the infinity stones and didn't care enough to investigate more.
ok, i do remember that.
in the ice house
He knocks on the point so much that when he's about to say the same thing again, after Superman's "I may not be perfect, but I'm trying" speech to him, that they got Krypto to come in to shut him up... because Gunn knows the audience had heard enough of the same bulletpoints.
EVERY single time Lex comes in, he's really just saying a slightly different version of the same message
I'm just glad I'm gonna get the world of JLA properly built live.
Also... A1 A1 A1 lol
I'm cautiously optimistic... this is a great start to a new universe, but... I need at least The Holy Trinity of DC to be done properly before I'm gonna dive head-first into it on every film lol
I love Lantern, I love Flash, I love the whole thing... but without the Holy Trinity... JL is like... no soul
This universe will be amazing.
[knock on wood] I hope so
mmmmm Zatanna
Snyder verse is great as an elseworlds, TAS universe is how it makes sense.
I think James Gunn has a similar sensibility. I'm on board, will watch a 2nd time next week
Snyderverse, as far as we know, is dead.
At least, Snyder himself doesn't seem to be interested in doing anything in it.
But once they run out of initial bits of ideas at the new DC things, and starts to mess with bigger and bigger threats, I'm sure they are going to bring a version of Snyderverse back somehow.
As an else world's yes
The big difference between Live-Action and Comics, is that you can keep adding levels of threats, while the Live Action sort of has a bit of a "seal of freshness"... Marvel stretched a good 10 years between Iron Man and Endgame, we'll see how much Gunn can stretch that.
The main continuity won't run out of ideas considering the mountain of source material to draw inspiration from
It's not like Marvel is short of materials themselves... look at where it is now?
Real actors get old, real world changes... there's a sort of timelessness inside comic worlds.
Dull argument, marvel still has enough material to revive the universe.
I think the mistakes of Marvel is that Feige tries to always refer to “popular and iconic” storylines based on what characters they have available to them.
Gunn is being smarter and expanding smaller storylines and characters (not quite with Superman, but Clayface etc)… and I think that will have a much better longevity.
Absolutely, but they are always worried about “popular characters”… they sort of wrote themselves into a corner, and now had to write themselves out
Like, why Galactus in Fantastic 4 at the get go?
Hopefully, they are setting up for Franklin and Valeria, but who knows
That's a matter of structure, JLU proves that it's possible to do well. And and so did everything before endgame. Sincerity, of writing has nothing to do with the quality of VFX or tone of the film.
Not at all, you’re totally right.
My problems with Marvel is that they really need to start looking at the minor characters again… like, I REALLY liked she-hulk and Ms Marvel, and The Marvels isn’t as bad as I felt on original watch… so plenty of fuel left in the tank in Marvel… they just need to handle it right
I’m more looking forward to the Doomsday reshuffle
I'm all for the type of world and story telling James Gunn is bringing to the DCU, because of the sincerity he brought to superman. DC is back baby.
At least when it comes to my own household, there’s plenty of room for both franchises honestly
Yeah cautiously optimistic. I LOOOOVE this Superman… but Gunn as a director is well proven… I don’t know how he’ll do as a studio head when managing other directors. So far I have faith in him, but I’m careful because I’ve been burned too many times by studios lol
Supergirl and Clayface will hopefully cement the new DC cinematic universe for me
The Brave and The Bold is honestly what I’m most hyped about… been dying for a Bat-family film in live action
same
and heard that its gonna be already established bat family
with batman and damian wayne as the main protagonists of the film
Clayface and swamp thing I’m most excited for, I think they could do some cool and unique things with these. Hopefully lower budget, great practical effects, character focused story.
Interested to see how they’ll do with clayface since it’s gonna be mature and body horror
Where’s this from??? Love this
Clayface was apparently supposed to be body horror, I can’t wait
What you said lol
Swampy is so passively anxy, if they get him right there’s not much “weird” in DC they can’t do honestly
It's an in universe Daily planet newspaper the day after the battle with Hammer of Boravia.. I only found the first page, hopefully other pages will be released too
Totally
As expected, I expect 450mil by the end of the weekend for it to reach 600-625mil prediction by end of 31-day initial run. I’ll need to do some maths if the more concrete numbers comes in Monday afternoon comes in higher than that.
I’m glad. I want that supergirl movie
WB already confirmed based on opening numbers that all of presently announced Gunn projects are a go
They know they will have to suffer some losses at the beginning
It’ll be worth it.
Superman making 600 million dollars with poor international box office numbers is amazing imo
As I said, they know they done fucked up, which is why they spent BIG money to fire the previous boss and hire Gunn AND his partner. They know they will have to suffer a bit, and is on the offensive.
It is. Although now international is slightly more.
Absolutely.. this movie was never gonna make a lot of money
I’m not trusting that the international is going to stay that low honestly, as word goes around. That’s the big variable in my pseudo math.
I think the WoM is saving this movie and it also has a rewatchability factor.. it has another week to make money and then there's Fantastic four
Let's see
I already rewatched twice
Same
I kinda want to watch it again.
WoM?
Word of mouth
Loved it better the second time and just maybe I might do Superman and Fantastic four back to back
Curious about F4 First steps
Yup
Oh yeah, I think it’ll be sometime next week when we have a bit of a rise in international, but I’m not sure if they will keep going up or plateau early, basically
I just want a fun Galactus and a good aesthetic.
I can’t judge a film by the trailers, but Disney pushes the film WAY harder than WB is pushing Superman.
I agree.
But Superman’s cast and crew, as well as Gunn himself is doing way more junket
I would’ve liked just seeing Silver doing an announcement and that’s it. Small teaser like Avatar Way of Water.
They are banking on word of mouth to help Superman ride through the initial volley from F4. I can’t gauge without seeing the film.
If the film is halfway decent, then the sustained box office of F4 will hurt Superman a lot. But honestly? I don’t have super amount of faith in Matt Shakman yet.
I honestly really want wait to see death of superman
The way James Gunn is, it's gonna be so cinema
I would already be sad if he dies the next movie
I want to see Death of Superman, but that’ll be at least a decade from now bwahaha
Doing Death of Superman immediately as the second film, was one of the biggest complaint for me for Snyderverse honestly
Agreed, have to let him cook first
This is second the funniest thing I’ve seen today
But it’s also kinda petty
Should’ve done a standalone MoS sequel first
I liked the way it was done in a vacuum, but yeah it was definitely too early
Gunn has also said the deaths in DCU will be permanent, so i doubt that is gonna happen for a very long time
Also the whole death of storyline was done really well in the animated movies
I didn't realize that Batman begins only made 375 million dollars worldwide with a 150 million dollars budget at a time when DC brand was totally tarnished esp after that horrible 1997 Batman and Robin movie. The thing going for Batman begins was that like Superman, it was received very well critically.
It's not the exact same situation of course for Superman but one thing common is DC brand being tarnished and so, Superman is doing pretty well even if it makes just 500 million dollars worldwide.
Superman came back well in the comics, so…
$7? lol
This is a movie though.. different than in comics and Gunn has said he doesn't want to cheapen the deaths and make it meaningless
We’ll see, plenty of fuel in the property and the actors are still young
True
Give it a decade and we’ll see where it goes
I agree
Imagine a Batman movie so bad the director and actor apologize for making it
But superman death wouldnt be permanent if it follows the comic...
It would make me choke myself to death frfr
Maybe he'll come back yearssss later after death
I kinda would also like James to stop responding to random tweets, he doesn't need to, the proof is in his work.
Do you think Superman will make it to 500+ Million guys? In my country seems dropping hard.
I believe it will.... I have to have hope!
I really hope so but in a world where furiosa flopped?
Yeah
It’s doing fine
The thing is repeated viewings are less attractive for a lot of the audience, given the ticket prices. I have to pay min 16 € for a regular 2D, so in a financial climate like this it's hard
guys superman was good
yes
It should at least make that much. Regardless the movie will underperform WW.
it was superman
Why would it underperform WW
"Red, Blue, and the American Way" was Superman's motto for a long time.. so what he symbolizes isn't going to hit very well outside of USA in general this year.. it was just a bit of a luck of the draw honestly.
I'm confident we'll see a lift Internationally though... but it will "underperform" as in, under 250mil WHOLE RUN Internationally... which is not World Wide... Word Wide includes USA+Canada "Domestic" market
So far, as far as openings Internationally, it's rather small and hasn't fully rolled out yet. China hasn't posted the official numbers yet due to a random confusion causing the film being pulled out of theaters on Friday on some theaters, though it is back now...
India had a whole backlash for the ending kiss being cut short by 8 seconds by the sensor board for being "overly sensual", but I don't know why the numbers aren't in yet.
A lot of countries that also apparently released on July 11th also still hasn't posted their numbers yet, I don't know why... I could find out, but too lazy right now.
On the raw data side, a lot of info are missing, and again, I don't know why. A lot of countries are posting 0s or just have the box office take.
Which is why I suspect that BoxOfficeMojo didn't post them... something doesn't make sense on the International side of the film.
There's literally no way a test market like Taiwan would be posting 0s since premiering 1 day earlier (2 days if you count timezones) under normal situations.
It's typically THE country to check ratios and matrices for domestic markets... often premiering up to 2 weeks ahead of Domestic.
Yeah internationally, this movie has done badly so far.
Absolutely, but there's a lot of errors in the official reporting for international that something is either HORRIBLY wrong, or someone is hiding something....
China's internal reporting was 257million Yuan, that's around $35mil... but Numbers lists 6.6mil, and BoxOfficeMojo doesn't even have China numbers, for instance.
It’s completely dead in China
Europe is a mixed bag
Heard it’s also not doing that well in Latin America, where Superman is a very popular character from what I’ve heard.
Last time I saw something like that was when Django Unchained got rush pulled when the censor board accidentally missed dude's full frontal nudity and the film had to be pulled for a week while they re-edit.
How does one miss that
I think Spider-Man 4 and Avengers: Doomsday will be the only superhero movies that will do well in China.
Isn’t China a big movie market tho?
The problem is LOCAL reporting from Taiwan was "over 40mil NT" on opening day, which is about 1.3mil US.
LOCAL reporting for China is 2.2bil yuan for 5 days cum, that's 30mil US.
It's not doing WELL, but something is wrong with the data
Lol it fell short of the predicted 40 crore here.
Yeah it's about 45% of prediction in Taiwan, and 12% of prediction in China.
65% in India sounds about right.
I think CBMs in general are facing issues overseas
Something like the Thunderbolts would’ve earned a lot more during the peak of MCU.
Have to go to local reportings, because the normal matrices are not great
Yeah confidence is low... at least Superman is a NEW thing... we'll see.. if FF was an apology letter, and was handled well... it might have a chance... but right now it ain't looking too great.
China doesn't count right now, it's a strange and locked down market.
There’s a chance The Odyssey will end up being the highest grosser next year.
Ineptitude?
Fantastic Four FS might not do well either box office wise regardless of reception
Superhero fatigue is real
Not superhero fatigue