#Statistical Analysis, Statistical Independence

18 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

unkempt kelpBOT
azure minnow
#

What you are describing is independant events versus consequential events

#

We know a fair coin will always be 50/50, so the odds of any individual flip being heads or tails is exactly 50/50

#

This is different from the odds of any specific path of events happening. Lets draw a diagram that will branch each time we flip the coin to detail heads or tails (give me a moment)

#

Using this random image I found on google, we can very clearly see that each flip is still 50/50, but there are an exponential amount of outcomes

#

The key idea is that each path has an equal chance of occurring

#

Its intuitive that the path Heads/Heads/Heads/Heads is going to be unlikely because we know that its a 1/2^4 chance of that happening

#

we need to guess 4 times and be correct

#

Same goes for tails/tails/tails/tails

#

But remember that there is nothing inherently special about h/h/h/h or t/t/t/t, other than as humans and thinkers we note that they are all the same value

#

It turns out that every path is just as unlikely whether its the path of entirely heads or entirely tails; we just associate significantly less value with the ones inbetween since we dont see an obvious pattern

#

If I wanted to roll specifically a h/t/h/h then, statistically, it would take me the same amount of time on average than if I wanted to roll a t/t/t/t or h/h/h/h

#

To address your claim a little bit about the 75% odds

#

Imagine the scenario in which we flip the coins twice: there are four outcomes

#

HH, HT, TH, TT

#

You say we are betting on H but the coin comes up T. This means that our first flip is a decided T, and the remaining paths given that are TH and TT

#

At this point in time, the odds of us winning are still 50%, but the odds of us losing twice in a row are 25%