13 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
is the ans 1712 mm^2 ??
no it was not
@cerulean hound
2419 mm^2 ??
@ebon valley
If not this what it is?
yes i think it was that
hmm
just subtract the csa of smaller cone from larger cone
and as we have removed the smaller cone
the upper part of frustum is also counted as surface so the lower the part
pi×5×5=area of upper exposed part pi×15×15=area of lower exposed part