#why is integral lnx integration by parts

9 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

opal path
#

Just curious why we cant integrate it as 1/x, im in calc 2 so this is definitely unnecessary reasoning but im just curious

bitter lilyBOT
iron agate
#

Because the derivative of 1/x is equal to -1/x^2

#

And -1/x^2 is not the same function as ln

#

Since -1/x^2 is equal to -1 at x=1
But ln(1)=0

#

The integral of ln(x) (aka the antiderivative) must be a function such that its derivative is exactly ln(x)

#

You are confusing with the fact that the derivative of ln(x) is 1/x

mild hatch
#

The integral ln(x) , dx is by integration by parts because it is the integral of a product of two functions, one of which is ln(x) and the other of which is 1. We can let u = ln(x) and dv = dx, so du = dx/x and v = x. Then, using the integration by parts formula,

mild hatch
#

Now, you can use the integration by parts formula:

∫ln(x)dx = uv - ∫v du

∫ln(x)dx = ln(x) * x - ∫x * (1/x)dx

Now, simplify the expression:

∫ln(x)dx = x * ln(x) - ∫dx

The integral of dx is simply x:

∫ln(x)dx = x * ln(x) - x + C

Where C is the constant of integration.

So, the integral of ln(x) with respect to x is x * ln(x) - x + C.