#Linear Algebra: Proving Linear Transformation

22 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

tidal stormBOT
long phoenix
#

What do you know about the dimensions of every space mentioned here?

drowsy thunder
#

nothing, i think it’s arbitrary?

long phoenix
#

What is the dimension of K? What is the dimension of R?

#

those are not arbitrary.

drowsy thunder
#

ohh sorry

long phoenix
#

R^3 has dimension 3. That means that f will have 3 dimensions to work with.

drowsy thunder
#

here is my answer tho i’m not sure if it’s correct.

long phoenix
#

but f is being forced to kill a bunch of the vectors in its domain.

drowsy thunder
long phoenix
#

This looks good. I'm not finished reading it, but I just wanted to say that in the line where you say f(x_1) = (1,1) and f(x_2)=(1,1), you don't actually need those to equal (1,1), they only need to be in the span of (1,1).

#

You also don't need x_1 and x_2

#

Oh, wait, you have the wrong conclusion.

#

dim(K)=2, and dim(R)=1

#

And remember that dim(ker(f)) + dim(im(f)) = dim(dom(f))

#

2+1=3 is true, so you should be able to find f.

drowsy thunder
#

so there is linear transformation?

long phoenix
#

Yes.

#

where you found that b=-a and c=-a, that was really good, but you should also find out something about d,e,f

drowsy thunder
#

okay okay i’ll try to answer it again, thank you for your help really 🙂 🫡

long phoenix
#

You're welcome. It's always nice to help someone who has thought about the question and tried something and shows what they have.

#

This is a good start. I'm sure you'll have it soon. Feel free to post what you get here to check it.