#help-43
1 messages · Page 31 of 1
observe that tan x is i a increasing function on interval (0,pi/2) then tan pi/4 <= pi/4+1 and lim x -> pi/2 tan x>=x+1 so there has to be an intersection om that interval
yea
y = x+1 is increasing over (-1,infinity), so the earliest intersection will be the smallest y
Do you need to formalize the proof, or just explain
explain
just explai
Ok. So there’s an infinite number of solutions for the equation you’re given, because tan (x) is periodic.
es
Oh my bad, I actually misread the problem a little. It’s asking for the smallest x value not smallest y
So it’s just asking you for the first time it intersects when x>0
yea..
Which happens to be in (pi/4,pi/2)
Nah that’s just what these channels are for
You’re not dumb because you’re asking for help
@digital trench Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @digital trench
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im confused
not yet
but i will
gimme one seoncd
*second
i fixed the -2 thing
it was supposed to be -12
i can just redo it later
thanks for the help though
.close
Closed by @bleak venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys
uhh
not really enough context
so essentially, we can deconstruct any permutation into a set of circles
are you working on a specific problem
wat'
they then toss a ball to a person per a given permutation
so essentially, the circular permutation represents the sequence through which any ball goes through
i recall you asking the same question earlier. what did you understand from that session?
ok sorry i gtg
no one replied
i am pretty sure a lot of people replied to your previous session. i just wanted to know how much you understood what they said
I think about circular permutations this way, circular permutations are not very much different from linear permutations, circular permutation just doesn't have a reference point. So, generally in circular permutations u first select a object as reference then the other objects can be arranged the same way you do in linear permutations. Though i am not sure if u can think this way
I think about circular permutations this way, circular permutations are not very much different from linear permutations, circular permutation just doesn't have a reference point. So, generally in circular permutations u first select a object as reference then the other objects can be arranged the same way you do in linear permutations. Though i am not sure if u can think this way
this
and the fact that many arrangements of abcde are taken as single just one arrangement
did you just copy the explanation of the person above you lol

@kind wind Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i feel like this is useless
because i always end up solving the issue
or getting stuck so badly and overcomplicating it
but im gonna try this time
here we go
is this correct?
because 5^6th is 15,625
minus the 1 in a geometric series formula
which is 15,624
then the bottom is 5-1 or 1 - (positive)5 its the same thing
so that's 4
15,624/4 is 3,906
then i took that number, brought the 15,624 from the "sum of the first 6 terms" in the geometric series formula down
and divided it by the NEW NUMBER
3,906
to which that told me it was... 4.
so the first term is. 4?
15,624 before the = was S sub nth term
the max terms here is 6 and it already gave me the answer to that
all i did was plug in
yes, this seems right :)
ok thank you
but then why is khan academy telling me i could've also done it this way?
is this problem commutative?
i meant it is
had to fix that 3 times sorry 😭
It's just using the formula for the sum in a geometric sequence and plugging the values
but yours is as correct
oh okay
of course
idk i just joined the surver lol
Closed by @grim nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
that was my first message
✅
im in need of another helper
alrighty
just double checking my answers
i think thats how it goes
cause they told me to add all 9 terms
but that's a big ass number
idk
i think geometric series are supposed to have big numbers though?
you can also use the formula
its like the quadratic formula it took me a while to get down
-b plusminus square root b squared - 4 * a * c
divided by 2 * a
i think thats it?
yep
and if its a negative square root number its square root that number * square root -1?
see, you got it
which is really just i?
so imaginary
yeah
its cause i was doing it over the span of like a few days tho
its fun
correct
yes
if you swap them both in the numerator and the denominator then yes
but i don't think you'll need to swap them
(im sorry in advance if my terminology is incorrect, i am still thinking in my native language)
although they shouldn't be that different
oh
so when i do the sum of the first 9 terms
can i just use the common ratio and go up to the 9th exponent of it?
like 3^2
yes that's it
oh my god
that's easier but it seems harder
does that make sense
it LOOKS harder
but its not
yeah yeah
of course
i am always happy to help
but if you see
you got it yourself
i just affirmed it
so congrats to you
oh this is so niceee
alright ima close this ticket now
im actually happy
tysm
.close
Closed by @grim nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
tried assuming x^x = t and solving
but it goes too long + sm stuff isn't substitutable
||NB: ln(ex)=ln(e)+ln(x)=1+ln(x)||
did that
then I think u=x^x is a very good substitution
Recall that $x^x=e^{x\log x}$.
EightyEightEpsilons
The derivative of $x^x$ is $x^x(1+ \log x)$
EightyEightEpsilons
Yay

👏
Closed by @molten elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the fractional part of x when k = 2,4,6,8
oh uh sorry i got distracted
okay so they are simply calculating all points at which the value of the expression in terms of x changes
so if we keep on increasing x
given the nature of the floor function
the value of the function will remain the same, and then jump by an integer at certain values
or wait nvm
uhh
or yes actually
essentially the function can "jump" by an integer whenever one of the values being floored reaches an integer
thus the floor of 8x will increase by 1 when x is a multiple of 1/8
multiple of 1/6 for 6x
multiple of 1/4 for 4x
and multiple of 1/2 for 2x
so we are calculating all possible values of k{x}?
no we are looking at all possible values of {x} where the function goes up by at least 1
what does the first line of the second page mean by "how the expression cahnges"
the function is mainly constant, with the exception of jumping at certain values by an integer
the expression "changes" at these points
the values where it jumps, are when the functions being floored reach the next integer
for example, as x goes from 2.9999 to 3, the floor of x/3 goes from 0 to 1
wdym by jump
as in this
by "the integer part of x changes by n" do they mean that the new integer part is now floor(x+n)?
in they mean that floor(new x)=floor(old x)+n
integer part is floor
so 20xfloor(old) + 20n
ah
i still dont get it
floor(k)x{x}=1,2,3,4..... yes
and then we divide the whole expression by floor(k) to get 1/(floor(k),2/(floor(k)),3/(floor(k)),.....
but then when k=2,4,6,8
shouldnt we deal with the values seperately?
so if k=2 then the expression will be 1/2,2/2,3/2... and when its 4 the expression will be 1/4,2/4,3/4....
@slender ferry Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @slender ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
this is my question
{x} should be like this
Im thinking about trying something else for this
this solution uses the euler toitient function
for refernece the full list is
{x} = 1/2, 1/4, 2/4, 3/4, 1/6, 2/6, 3/6, 4/6, 5/6, 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 6/8, 7/8
2{x} changes when x = 1/2
4{x} changes when x = 1/4, 2/4, 3/4
6{x} changes when x = 1/6, 2/6, 3/6, 4/6, 5/6
8{x} changes when x = 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 6/8, 7/8
this is not how you read the floor function
we're going to skip that you mentioned this and move on
its kxfloor({x})?
no sorry floor(k*{x})
multiplication
does it occur to you that maybe having x represent multiplication and the letter x is a bad idea?
go use *
sorry
and also, you dont need to type the * in there since k {x} already means k times {x}
you can just type it like the problem, which is floor(k{x})
oh
so theyre listing all the numbers where this would change values
yea the floor() is missing from the explanation, I need to add that in
floor(2{x}) changes when x = 1/2
floor(4{x}) changes when x = 1/4, 2/4, 3/4
floor(6{x}) changes when x = 1/6, 2/6, 3/6, 4/6, 5/6
floor(8{x}) changes when x = 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 6/8, 7/8
cant x be any nummber?
except 1
what about 0.00002?
i initially didnt believe it
now i do
youll notice all thats been added is floors
so most of the time, a small change would just be rounded off
changes in value only happen at specific places
so what we can do is look at what we have then see when itd happen
for example 20 floor(x) would change value when x is an integer
(so {x} = 0)
we can ignore this for now
as before,
floor(2{x}) changes when x = 0, 1/2
floor(4{x}) changes when x = 0, 1/4, 2/4, 3/4
floor(6{x}) changes when x = 0, 1/6, 2/6, 3/6, 4/6, 5/6
floor(8{x}) changes when x = 0, 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 6/8, 7/8
so the expression changes value when
{x} = 0, 1/2, 1/4, 2/4, 3/4, 1/6, 2/6, 3/6, 4/6, 5/6, 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 6/8, 7/8
again we ignore 0
what youre left with is that list of numbers that theyre mentioning, likely not intended to have the order matter
@slender ferry Has your question been resolved?
@slender ferry are you still stuck on something
i was afk for a while
dont they change when x is any value except for 1?
first of all, that was evaluated incorrectly
second of all, at x=0 is also 0
so thats literally not a change
so the only possible values are 2 and 0?
no
for floor(2{x})
human lets do this one step at a time
okay
youre going too far
lets first try to check something simpler
first, whats the range of {x}
be more specific
inclusive of 0
so [0, 1)
yea
now what about the range of 2{x}?
if x < 0.5 then its 0 to 1 but not 1
if x = 0.5 then its 0
if x > 0.5 then its >1
whats 2{1.3}
yes
also, the range is presumably just the possible numbers that 2{x} can be
what youve given me is
not that
I see on the right its 0, or 0 to 1 but not 1, or > 1
0 to 2 but not 2?
[0, 2), yes
the range of {x} is [0, 1)
the range of 2{x} is [0, 2)
because its just 2 times [0, 1)
yea
now whats the range of floor(2{x})
0,1,
{0, 1}
yep
so floor(2{x}) can only ever be 0 or 1
now do you think, for most values of x, floor(2{x}) would change?
or does floor(2{x}) only change at specific values?
wdym by change
as in "not stay the same if x varies by a small bit"
@slender ferry alr lets try this
can you name the values of x where floor(2{x}) is 0?
specific?
that question was poorly worded, lets try something easier to say
oh
such as: can you name the values of x where floor(2{x}) is 0?
0 to 1 but not 1
are you sure?
0 to 0.5 but not 0.5
theres more values out there than just the numbers from 0 to 1
0 to 0.5 but not 0.5 right?
those numbers are correct at least
you need to name more numbers than that though
[0, 0.5) and what other numbers out there?
would x=1 work?
so for what values of x does floor(2{x}) equal 0?
[0,0.5) and all positive integers including zero
2
whats {1.1}?
1/10
2 {1.1} is?
1/5
floor(2 {1.1}) is?
0
so looking at the numbers between 1 and 2,
ohh
which of these numbers also make floor(2{x}) equal 0?
thats correct, [1, 1.5)
a thing you can think of is that {x} only knows the decimal part of x
so since floor(2{x}) has its first step be doing {x},
floor(2{x}) cant tell apart 1.1 from 0.1
or 2.1 from 0.1
or -0.9 from 0.1 (since -0.9 + 1 = 0.1)
so there are infinite possibilities
then?
using this, try coming up with all the numbers for which floor(2{x}) is 0
so far we have [0, 0.5) U [1, 1.5)
{x} is a function that repeats for +1 to x and for -1 to x
[a,a.5) where x belongs to whole numbers
you couldve just said [n, n + 0.5)
but yes thats the idea
so for $[n,n+0.5)$ for some integer $n$, the value is 0
mtt
now since the value can only ever be 0 or 1,
for which values is floor(2{x}) equal to 1?
(n+0.5, n+1) for some integer n
thats not correct, try saying that again
think about what kind of interval youre describing before you say this
is this correct?
[n + 0.5, n + 1)
but then we'll get one
[n + 0.5, n + 1) is correct
yes
alr, now lets notice what happens with these intervals
any time {x} is 0, thats the integers, right
yea
now youll notice that when {x} = 0, floor(2{x}) changes value, right
before, the value was 1
after the value was 0
yes
now when {x} = 0.5, floor(2{x}) also changes value
from 0 to 1
right
yea
so floor(2{x}) only changes at when {x} = 0 or when {x} = 0.5
it doesnt change at any other value of x
do you see how that happens?
yes
ohh
OHHH
I GOT IT
TY
.close
Closed by @slender ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $$B = { x\in \mathbb{R} \mid \log_2(-x^2+7x-10) + 3 \sqrt{\cos(\pi \sqrt{x^2+7}) -1} = 1 }$$
Find the sum of all of the members in $B$
Copter
well we get $$\pi\sqrt{x^2+7} -1 = 2\pi n$$
for integer n, because cos(...) <= 1, but the square root has to be >=0 which implies cos(…) >=1
is this reasoning right? thats all im asking
Copter
and so the big sqrt(cos) term is 0
you are not supposed to subtract 1 there
but, sure, yes, the idea is that the 3sqrt() term vanishes everywhere when defined
Closed by @hazy obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. Is my Maths answer for this Past Paper correct? Do i get 5/5 marks?
It is a Past paper ( Exam past paper ) for the Mathematics course i am currently undergoing.
Is my answer correct? 5/5 mark
Minus the estimation.
I didnt do that yet.
First we deposited 36 euros
Then we had to pay 15 euros every month, for 12 months
That is 180 euros
So 216 euros is the total cost of the payment plan
Now how much is an 8% less price of 240 euros because we have to compare it with the payment plan to see whether the payment plan saves the @polar peak more or less
Oh yes pounds, mb
,w 0.08 × 240
,w 240 - 19.2
220.8 > 216
So we end up saving more using the payment plan
Yes
But in the conclusion
You haven't stated whether you are making more profit or loss
And that is the question
So no full marks
You said "no"
But it does save 8 percent, and even more
The answer is "yes"
Idk, a wrong answer would get you maybe 2 marks for step marking or 1.5
The reasoning you made is flawed, better luck next time

You said 5 marks*
Not 6
Depends on how you were taught
If the amount has to be exact then you are correct
You get all 5 marks
It's actually more better that way, we need not to talk more than needed or it causes problems
Imagine someone asking you whether I will be able to save 8% on this 20 pounds on this sweatshirt, and you go like YES, you even save 6 dollars more
And the other person is like: But who asked?
Please be polite
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Question: Giving 5 marks on such a basic question make me wonder which class are you in? We learn this type of percentages in class 5th. So are you a 5th grader by chance?
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
you DID receive an answer, @polar peak: your answer will NOT receive full points, because you did NOT answer the question
you'd get like 3 ish marks for that
why are you so obsessed with this? it doesnt matter.
you keep asking "how many points do i get" correcting your answer is more important than 2 points.
(box the "no" please)
okay now you're just spamming 
lets invite everybody who asked to a party! i can afford that.
...
don't use gpt, it's unreliable
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
My argument is that you still saved 8 pounds even if it's more than 8 pounds
gpt is flattering you, its in its nature.
...for what it's worth, saying "no, it saves 10%" and "yes, you pay no more than 92%" are both correct answers
unfortunately, I see calculations but not justifications 😭
@polar peak Has your question been resolved?
is GPT marking your actual work?
because if it's not and you're inclined to believe it more than humans checking your work, then are you asking us to validate GPT or are you actually asking for your work to be checked?
.close
Closed by @snow finch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi guys is there any way to simplify this further? it looks rlly weird. the answer is supposed to simplify to a=4bcos(2x)cos(x)
I'm guessing it involves using the trig identity for sin(3x) and cos(3x)?
welll we haven’t covered triple angle identities (yet?) and I feel like if I go down that road it’s gonna turn out more complicated 😭
sin(2x + x)
yea I tried that it didn’t work out D:
you can derive them from using the trig addition formula from sin(2x+x) and cos(2x+x)
oh in that case I did that
ok mb it’s like really cramped but here’s what I did im not sure if it’s right 🧍♀️
looks right but I can't really see a way to simplify it further
yea same here
i think the approach i took with this question might be wrong I’ll js try again
ty
.close
Closed by @languid gate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how ts work?
how does rate of change stuffs work
ye
Now, what's the length?
Or A'(x) in other words
It's just the derivative
Huh?
A'(x) will be 6x, right?
ye
Wait sorry
ok
Time is not involved here
Because it's rate of change with respect to width
.
ye making sense
nvm it was wrong nvm what i said
but yeah A'(x) = 6x
Yeah I didn't understand what you were referring to sorry
o ok
So we need the value of x
Nope, 75 is the area, and not the derivative of the area
oh true
So 3x² = 75 and we can solve for x
yeah that's correct
so its like
rate of change is same as like
slope at a point x?
but in this its rate of change at specific width?
or gradient
yeah you're looking at how the area changes with respect to the change of the width
and then if im finding the gradient at a point its how y changes wrt x?
it's the same principle basically
ic
man theres so many different ways to describe this derivative stuff
atleast i get how to do the questions
🥀
The gradient at some point is exactly the derivative of your function
ye i get that
Actually, that's why derivates are used a lot 💪
Closed by @ebon wharf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone double check please
@floral wadi Has your question been resolved?
I think your domain for number 4 should be the union of two open intervals
same for the range
but other than that everything looks good
You can also use Desmos to check your answers yourself
@floral wadi Has your question been resolved?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
oh
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if the equation of line are written with constant terms c1 and c2 positive then the equation of the bisectors of the angle containing the origin is obtained by using positive sign in equation of bisectors
can someone help me understand why this is the case
this thing bassically
like if upon putting a coordinate into equations of 2 lines it yields the same sign at the end what does that mean ?
@plain marlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @plain marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I tried to use formula A^-1 = 1/detA * objA and tried to obtain the degree of the determinant, can someone please help ?
<@&286206848099549185>
I'm guessing we're assuming A is invertible?
If so I think the best way might be to multiply A with the inverse and look what happens in the position (i,i) for an arbitrary i and equalise it with 1
Also what happens on the position (k,j) and equalise it with 0
Since we know q_{ij} is a polynomial of degree two write it as ax²+bx+c
A is an nxn matrix, and each entry is of degree 2, so det(A) can't have degree greater than 2n
yeah it is sure it is but what obout objA ?
furthermore, each entry of the adjugate matrix to A is the determinant of an (n - 1)x(n - 1) submatrix of A
which can't be of degree greater than 2(n - 1)
so each entry of A^-1 is looking like degree 2(n - 1)/2n
Could you explain it bit more 😢
you mean while calculating coefficients we will endup with (n-1) x (n-1) matrices and multiplyed by aij right ?
but since aij is also already 2. degree polinomial than how it could be 2(n-1) ?
thanks for the help btw < 3
each entry of the adjugate matrix is the determinant of an (n - 1) by (n - 1) submatrix of A by definition
oww my bad I was also multiplying it with aij (like we did while calculating determinants)
well this proofs I need coffe
the determinant of an (n - 1) by (n - 1) matrix whose entries are degree 2 polynomials is a massive sum and product of quadratics with (n - 1) terms and (n - 1) quadratic factors in each term
so our A^-1 will be rational ?
so the degree of the final polynomial of the submatrices is capped at 2(n - 1)
so each entry of the adjugate is a polynomial with degree max 2(n - 1)
divide that by the 1/det A factor, and each entry of A^-1 is of degree 2(n - 1)/2n
so yes, rational 
< 3
this is really just an exercise in book-keeping degrees of polynomials under products and sums 
🙁
why sad 
it happens
maybe I should've let you do more of the problem 
you had the right idea though
it all just came down to counting degrees
anyway
and using definitions 
Closed by @mental jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
have a great day too!!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help understanding this part
turing machines can be simulated if
- sigma eventually becomes constant
- twice differentiable
- nonzero derivative on open interval
so why exactly does sigma=arctan not work like they say there?
or by "eventually constant" they mean derivative goes to zero on both sides AND $\lim_{x\to -\infty} \sigma(x) = \lim_{x\to +\infty} \sigma(x)$?
artemetra
I feel like this is probably just "eventually constant, twice differentiable, non-zero derivative on open interval" ⇒ simulate-able, but there are others that can be as well? I'm very much not well versed in this area though, so I wouldn't rely on this answer
no i am not well versed as well xd
What's this from?
but it just says
arctan and other [...] functions do not satify these hypothesis
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005109800000509
this is the paper but i doubt context is of relevance here
it's alright haha
i really do think it's just that but it's weird wording nonetheless
page 15 btw
Doesn't look like I can get access since I'm not currently in any academic area
i can dm you the pdf
Is that pirating? 🙃
No, I mean, is sharing it considered pirating it to me
koiran 1996 for reference
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304397596000886
I would just wait for someone else, I really don't think I can help lol
thank you, was gonna check that out later
their example function is
0 if x <= 0, x if 0 <= x <= 1, and 1 if x >= 1. so it is a constant function for x >= some constant
Is reading the previous pages necessary for the part you are asking, cause I think that's a lot
which is presumably what they mean by eventually constant
aha
alright
so it's equal to a constant past some point
makes sense
thank you!

.close
Closed by @young raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the time to failure of a unit is modeled by an exponential distribution with a variance of 40,000^-1 hours, the probability that a product requiring 3 identical and independent units connected in a standby configuration will survive 100 hour is?
do i use gamma distribution for this one?
yep
okay in the solution it said that the variance=1/limda^2
but in the book it says that the variance=r/limda^2
is there any reason why he used 1 instead of 3?
hmm?
the variance should be just 1/lambda^2
sum of n exponentially distributed random variables (that are independent) with parameter lambda will yield a Gamma distribution with params shape=n and rate=lambda
why so
it's a well known property
okay youre saying that the variance is 1/lambda^2 right?
but in the book it says r/lambda^2
I don't know what book you have nor the context of what they are claiming
statistical quality control
they might be talking about the mean and not the sum of the variables
Closed by @trail arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for the first one it seems g(x) is a jump meaning it is discontinuous and therefore DNE so the addition of both of them = DNE right
for the second one I see f(x) does converge on a point at 2 but there is no dot I think that means the limit still exists not sure but that would mean it is equal to 0 right then also g(x) does not get approached from both sides at that point so it is DNE making two also DNE right?
then for three again same situation there’s no dot but it is being approached from both sides at that point right but g(x) is only being approached from one side so it also DNE idk
for four same situation right idk
for five it seems from the left side f(x) is equal to -1 right?
so 3+f(x) would be like 2 idk
- Fine
- f(2) = 0. I think the graph of g just got cut off at x=2 tho ngl.
- What do you mean by "g is being approached from one side"? g is defined both to the left and to the right of x=0.
- See above
- You want the limit of sqrt(3+f(x)), not 3+f(x).
maybe I dont fully understand how approaching works because idk what g(x) for 3 and 4 is
if you could explain that
This is what it looks like as x approaches 0 for g
from the left and the right, you can see that you approach what looks to be around 2.7 from both directions
same logic for 4
oh ok yea no I did the earlier but for some reason decided it was wrong
rip
Yes both question 3 and question 4 are zero
as $\lim_{x \to 0} f(x)=0$ and $\lim_{x \to 0} g(x) \neq 0$
Civil Service Pigeon
ok thank you bro got it

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@compact cairn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
as a geo main this trivial geom is slightly annyoing
diagram with lines added in
It is natural to construct right angles after given many equal lengths
But i find it hard to continue
Help is greatly appreciated, if you can please break it down and give me some hints thanks
@inland nacelle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@inland nacelle Has your question been resolved?
BAC=3x and ABN=2x? So BAC:NBA=3:2?
Ngl this problem looks more complicated than it actually is
oops
stupidity
i change later
.close
Closed by @inland nacelle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
mb i gtg
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find x to maximize alpha
I used tan sum identity and differential to find max here
But that's awful and look like a mess
So I want to know if there is any other way to do it
X=540/11?
No
It's almost 71
Idk the exact here since I used calculator to solve for x
It only shows decimal
Is those 2 triangles similar?
Do u have the key?
The bot is not working
Hmm, ya
Easy
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
Ngl reading this kinda hurt my eye
I'll try to explain it another way
I hope this's faster than the tan way i used
We have two poles: the one on the left is 60 m high (from to ) and the one on the right is 105 m high (from to ).
Between them is a "V" cable made up of two wires: one goes from to a point in the middle (), the other goes from to one point in the middle (), the other goes from to another point in the middle ().
Between them, there is a 15-meter horizontal stretch.
These two wires intersect at a point down there, forming an angle.
For each value of , you can calculate where and connect to and , and find the point where the wires cross.
With the coordinates of , we can calculate the angle using trigonometry (dot product of the vectors and ).
Doing this for various values of , we see where the angle reaches its maximum.
After doing this and calculating we arrive at
$x \approx 71 \quad\text{e}\quad \alpha_{\max} \approx 81{,}16^\cir$
Hater
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Ok?
Not yet,hold on
Forr each value of...?
For each value of x
Sorry I'm having trouble with translation
Wait for someone to come help
Yeah I think you missing some variable and point while translate
@molten badger Has your question been resolved?
Your approach is to find vector AC and BC and use dot product?
Holy, that gives me cos(alpha)^2= f(x)/g(x) with f(x) and g(x) are both 4 degree polynomials
Yeah I'm not gonna do that
@molten badger Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @molten badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I disagree
well then you can take it up with the <@&268886789983436800>
@compact storm Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @compact storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Yep
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1 + 1 - 2sin²x = 1. Solve for x.
[ \sin(\pi - x) = \sin(x)]
How does this help then?
find this first
Solving straight ahead with arcsin we get -pi/4 and pi/4
thats not all the answers
^
pi/2?
180 - (-pi/4)
pi + pi/4, ye
True
Then we group them together with a bracket and add +2kpi?
Or is there something to the periodicity that I haven't known of?
Like, (pi + pi/4, ..., ..., ....) + 2kpi?
think of the unit circle
Tangent = 1/hyp?
the answer we've discovered so far are pi/4, 3pi/4, 5pi/4, 7pi/4, ...
Yes
what do u notice
We have both negative and positive values so the quadrants don't matter
yup
So should I just +2kpi?
nah
So I leave the answer at this?
nope
whats the difference btw each of the valueshere
-sinx right
k
.close
Closed by @sullen gorge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with this question pls
$n(x+y)=xy$
Alexis_Fx
Alexis_Fx
$x(n-y)+ny=0$
Alexis_Fx
oh ok
$x=\frac{ny}{y-n}$
Alexis_Fx
Keep in mind x is positive integer, what can you get from here
I guess so
No
$x=n+\frac{n}{y-n}$
Alexis_Fx
Agree?
yeah
And when n/y-n is an integer?
Do you understand what i said here?
Answer this, this is the key
x is integer?
when x is a factor of 6
Yes
And here?
when n-y is a factor of n
Yeah
With each y we only have 1 unique x so
Yeah
Now you know how to do the rest
$2000 = 2^4.5^3$
Alexis_Fx
k
Do you have any idea to count it in mind?
Alexis_Fx
Now look at this, every divisor of 2000 has to include some power of 2 and 5 only
This can't be divisor of 2000 right? $2^2.5^2.3^2$
Alexis_Fx
yeah
Since we have 3^2 here
yeah
But this's $2^2.5^2$ a divisor of 2000
Alexis_Fx
See any pattern here?
OHH ok
Notice anything?
brb
@main sail Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @main sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys can anyone help me out with this problem please im very lost:
Well theres a very famous 10 digit number 3816547290
its the only 10 digit
with that property
clearly the problem is about finding that number and showing it is unique