Channel closed
Closed by @gilded hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 123 of 1
Closed by @gilded hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A student must answer seven out of eleven questions on an exam. In how many ways can the student answer the questions if at least four of the first six questions on the exam must be answered
divide it in cases.
a) ways when he answers exactly 4 of the first six.
b) ways when he answers exactly 5.
c) ways when he answers exactly 6.
$\binom{6}{4} \binom{5}{3} + \binom{6}{5} \binom{5}{2} + \binom{6}{6} \binom{5}{1}$
Merineth
This is the answer but
I have literally no idea what i'm even reading
First it states that he must answer 7/11 questions? Then it says he must answer at least four of the first six questions?
okay, so i'm gonna help you with case (a)
you have the first 6 questions, and you answer 4 of them. So you have 6C4 ways to answer those questions, correct?
Yes
okay. So you now need to answer 3 additional questions. Since you're not answering any of the first six, you're left with the other 5, so for each of those 6C4 of the first block, you got 5C3 ways to answer the second block of questions, correct?
Yeah
that would be your first term. Is this enough information for you to do (b) and (c)?
this way you;re not counting answering 9 questions right
maybe that's the intetion, just it's not realistic
there's many kinds of exams where you just get to answer a determined amount of questions, not all of them
I get at most 20 out fo 50 right on every math exam so far :) so it's realistic :(
But yeah i see what you mean when it comes to this
The sum of all the three outcomes where he answers 4, 5 or 6 of the first 6 questions
that would be the number of ways to answer at least 4, yes
It's just crazy to me that i'm meant to solve these myself. Clearly something wrong with me
combinatorics problems are like 95% reading extremely slowly and 5% knowing the few formulas
I wish it was that easy
I can't solve a single one lol
"How many 4 digit numbers can you create of the numbers 1,2,3,4,5,5,6,6
You say it's about reading it slow but
It really doesn't matter in my case
are the 5 and 6 supposed to be repeated?
Yes
okay, divide it in 4 cases
(a) you dont repeat any number
(b) you repeat the 5
(c) you repeat the 6
(d) you repeat both
can you solve (a)?
order matters
can you solve (b)?
b) should be 7P4
how do you get that
1,2,3,4,5,5,6 i repeat 5 once which means we have total of 7 but we still choose 4. 7P4
actually nvm
nPk and nCk have more requirements than having n and taking k
seems to me like you need to pay more attention to the details of the definition
i'm gonna go and detail (b) a bit more
we're saying that we're taking both 5's
you have a 4-digit number
in how many different positions can the 5's be?
4
how do you get that
that is not correct
you have 4 slots
you have 2 coins
the coins are equal
how many ways can you distribute the coins in the slots, if you can only put one coin per slot?
1P4 then 1P3?
permutations require the items to be distinct
1C4 then 1C3?
there's no "then" in combinatorics
1C4 * 1C3
55__
5_5_
5__5
_55_
_5_5
__55
Oh
4C2
Ok
you should revise the definitions
you're overlooking important details that make you unable to distinguish when to use each correctly
It just doesn't make sense to me
I've spent nearly a year trying to learn this. I just dont get it
Permutations of n elements:
Ways to order n distinct elements.
Pn = n!
Permutations of n elements, we take only k:
Ways to order the first k out of n distinct elements.
nPk = n! / (n-k)!
n! is the ways to order all of them.
(n-k)! is the ways to order the last elements that we dont care about
I'm aware the permutations is used to rearrange items that are distinct.
Combinations is used to select/choose items that are indistinct
Combinations nCk:
Ways to select k items, among n distinct items, ignoring the order.
nCk = n! / [ k! (n-k)! ]
I just dont understand how you could so easily determine that you are supposed to divide it into a) b) and c)
see that nCk = nPk / Pk
or in other words, the ways to order the first k elements, and then ignoring the order
the more you do, the more clear it becomes
the thing is, i assume you were given 6 different formulas
We aren't given any formulas
permutations with and without repetition, variations with and without repetition, and combinations with and without repetition
(names might vary in your place)
the three formulas i've given you would be permutations, variations and combinations without repetition
On our exam we aren't given any formulas that regard permutations. He expects ut to know them all by heart
i'm not talking about the the exam. I'm talking about your lectures.
We dont have any lectures, we only have the book for reference
the book surely has the formulas for combinatorics explained
you need to know where they come from. Knowing the formula by heart without knowing how to obtain it yourself is almost completely useless
and if you know how to obtain them you dont need to memorize them, cuz you can get them back on the spot
Oh i see so i have to read the entire book + memeorize each page with each theorem to be able to get htem back on the spot meaning i wont need to memorize them?
You need to understand the principles... Not memorize. Don't be so dramatic, you are not the first student taking combinatorics class
Dramatic?
Yes
It's a sincere question?
well, you usually do need to read once the full text of the material you're covering
Considering there are people here who are able to answer every single question, means i have to be doing something wrong to not be able to solve any, no? How is it dramatic to ask a sincere question of how to actually be able to solve the questions at hand?
we are able to answer them because we have studied it back in the day, same as you will at some point
This sounds cynical to me
It wasn't meant as cynical, sorry
but you wont magically learn to do the problems if you just memorize formulas
you NEED to understand where formulas come from and WHEN they can be used
I see. It's just so hard to learn them. I'm not really that good at reading university textbooks
You should try to find some lecture videos online or something
Shouldn't be hard to find...
Yeah i've watched the entire series of Khan academy about Combinatorics and the organic chemistry tutor. And i understand everything they say. I just can't solve problems on my own
OK, continue solving problems, we are here to help 🙂
The sort of reasonable memorization to have here is to be able to recall definitions when needed, however understanding these are as important but the trouble is thinking you can re-derive most definitions
I see
Most proofs are just by definition
Let's get back to concrete questions...
Here you should understand that when you multiply you treat the 5's as distinct
Yeah
Here you need to try and solve it with the tools you are familiar with and see where you get stuck. Then try to come up with a solution
that's why i separate it in cases, for example. Each case corresponds to one of the elemental definitions
One way it to break it into distinct cases and use the "Sum rule"
^important here, the cases must never be able to coexist
all the basic "formulas" are simply based on the "sum rule" and the "product rule"
you need to understand these principles well
And that applies only to the sum rule?
yes, because if they can coexist, you cant just add them
and if they do exist together it's the product rule?
no
Product rule is for "and" and sum rule is for "or"
The "or" can be simply summed if the cases do not overlap
How many ways can you do A or B?
#(ways to do A) + #( ways to do B) - #(ways to do A and B)
if A and B is nothing
then you simply add...
1,2,3,4,5,5,6,6
If i'm going to make a 4 digit combination how many possibilites are there
(a) No repeating numbers
(b) you repeat the 5
(c) you repeat the 6
(d) you repeat both
a) If no reapting numbers we jsut remove 5 and 6 from the pool meaning 1,2,3,4,5,6 all are distrinct so it's permutation. 6P4
b) If i repeat the 5 _ _ _ _ like you mentioned they are the same so it's combinations. 4C2 but then we have to add all the other numbers? 1,2,3,4,6 Shouldn't it be 5C2 ?
I remember this specifically being in the book but it's crazy to me how you are able to remember it. Feels like it's mandatory to be able to memoerize formulas like that to be able to solve it?
You should simply think of a venn diagram
In the last part, with the numbers 1,2,3,4,6 the order is important since the numbers are distinct
So 5C2 is not the right answer
You should internalize the logic behind it. Not memorize
the basic building blocks (like the sum rule, and the product rule) should be understood really well... And everything follows from that
if you repeat the 5's, you start by placing the 5's on two of the slots. I put the bruteforce method up there, where you could see 6 distinct ways to do it (4C2)
now, for each of those six positions, you'd still have to put the remaining numbers on the two slots remaining
Trying to draw one but i dont even know what supposed to be included haha
now since we explicitly say that we do not repeat the 6, you're left with five options: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and two slots, where the order is important
which means that for those 6 cases of the positions of the 5's, you got 5P2 ways to put the other two numbers
so (b) would be 4C2*5P2
Yepp that makes sense
(c) should be the same method as (b).
4C2 for placing the two 6s. Then we have 5P2 left
4C2*5P2
now try (d)
well that essentially means we are placing 4 digits 5,5,6,6into 4 spots. This should be 4*3*2*1 possible locations?
My reasoning for multiplying is _ _ _ _ i have 4 spots. and 4 digits 5,5,6,6 first i take the 5 and i have 4 spots to place it, then i take the other 5 and i have 3 spots to place it ... all the way to the last digit
yes, so you count, for instance, 5 5 6 6 multiple times
for instance, you place the first 5 in the first place then the second 5 in the second place and so on
you would get the same if you place the first 5 in the second place and the second 5 in the first place
so you can't do this.
You already did something similar in the previous cases
how did you treat the 5's?
in case (b)
I placed them and then the remaining options?
In past questions i solved double letters with dividing with them
4! / 2!2!
This works
Oh it works?
But you need to understand what you are doing
the simple way to do it is to choose the spots for the 5's
and the remaining spots are for the 6's...
so it's simply 4C2.
or 4C2 * 1 (since there is one way to place the 6's after you place the 5's)
is it 4C2 because we have 4 spots but only 2 distinct choices?
4 spots, and we want to choose 2 spots to place the fives
So we choose 2 out of 4
which equals 4C2
4C2 is only for the 5s?
yes
but once you place the 5s, you have one option to place the 6s
So its 4C2 overall
I thought it was both for 5 and 6
I had a problem where i had algebra and the solution was 7! / 2!
it is, as i said...
you choose the spots for the 5s say 5 X 5 X
(I don't know how to do underscores lol)
now you place the 6s, but there is one way to place the 6s once you place the 5s
5 6 5 6
you have four slots.
You have two 5's, and two 6's.
You start positioning the 5's, which can be placed in any of the 4C2 = 4!/2!2!=6 ways.
Now you got two slots remaining, for two 6's.
Since they are identical, there's only one way to place them
because at that point, you were asked to reorder all the letters.
Assuming the letters were distinct, you got 7 letters.
So you have 7! ways to order them.
Since the "a" is repeated, it doesnt matter where you place each of them, so you divide by the ways to order the two "a"s that are not, in fact, distinct, 2!
6P4 + 4C2*5P2 + 4C2*5P2 + 4C2 = 360 + 6*20 + 6*20 + 6 = 360 + 120 + 120 + 6 = 606?
hmm yes it's 606 according to the book also
I understand when you explain i jsut can't create it myself
Or solve it rather
Dead inside I’ll pick it up after a break, thanks tho
.close
Closed by @gilded hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello I need help in this problem,not in the problem itself is just that I need to calculate the area of the side of the house, I thought it was just multiply 35 by 10 but it is not and I do not really don’t know what to do
@cloud oyster Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@cloud oyster Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello i need help with determining the traversal of given binary trees
what is going to be the inorder and postorder traversal of the tree
what i know so far:
for inorder its gonna start at the top first and traverse all the way left down to 4 8 and then go back up to '-' and down right to '%' the on the left to 7 then back up to '%' and then down to 2
and then i think its gonna go to the root node? and then im not sure how
for inorder you can just think of it as left to right
for postorder you follow the perimeter in the clockwise direction
so im confused what happens when it goes back to the root node after its done with the left side of the tree
for inorder^
starts with the leftmost node in the right subtree of the root
so 1 8?
yep
then it goes to - ?
try tracing the recursive algorithm yourself
hmm i was watching a video
inorder(node):
inorder(node.left)
payload()
inorder(node.right)
payload() is just writing down the node data in this case
@void storm Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @void storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Connor has a mass of 76.0kg and is competing in the state diving championship. He leaves the springboard from a height of 3.00m above the water with a speed of 5.94m/s in the upward direction. Use Work-Kinetic Energy theorem to solve the following quesiton.
a. Determine Connor's speed when he strikes the water
b. Connor's body plunges to a depth of 2.15m below the water before stopping. Determine the average force of water resistance experienced by his body
so for a. i figured out that his speed is 9.70m/s (same as answer key)
but for b. my answer is rounded to 1660N when the answer is 2410N
Using the work-kinetic energy theorem, WDtotal = change in KE
so force x displacement = 1/2mv^2
1/2mv^2 = 1/2 * 76.0 * 9.70^2 = 3575.42J
force = 3575.42/2.15 = 1660N
@daring valley Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$x_1+x_2 = 6$ (0.6)(1.5)(2.4)(3.3)(4.2)(5.1)(6,) why doesn't the formula for stars and bars work? $\binom{n+k-1}{k}$
Merineth
here k being the bottom number is the sum, 6
n is the number of variables, 2
7C6 = 7
n = number of numbers 6
k = x_1 and x_2 = 2
?
rafilou2003
Hmm, that formula isn't listed in the book. How do they differ?
$\binom{\text{total sum}+\text{number of variables}-1}{\text{total sum}}$
rafilou2003
it's exactly the formula you got in your book
except you probably mixed up k and n
if you're using this formula
then it's $x_1 + .... + x_n = k$
rafilou2003
$\binom{k+n-1}{k}$ This is the one listen in my book
Merineth
ok
so it's for this
if you're using this formula
then it gotta match with this
x_1 + x_2 = 6
k = 6
n=2
4
huh?
how many "x_..." appear in your sum?
2
yes
i was under the impression that k are how many boxes there are and n how many stars?
no, you got them reversed, k is the number of stars
oh...
could you send a picture of where it's mentioned in your book?
we could clear things up
but for normal combinations for example 5C3 $\binom{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$ where n = total and k = 3 for which n stands for the total and k stand for choices?
Merineth
rafilou2003
Yeah that's the one i have
"The number of combinations of size k of n different objects" Is the translation from the book
Sure
One sec and i'll translate
"The number of combinations with repetitions of size k among n given objects is equal to ..." (where the ... is the formula)
And the formula for combinations is
"The number of combinations of size k of n different objects"
So the problem i've had all along is that i assumed for example $x_1+x_2 = 10$ where n = 10 and k = 2 but in fact it was n = 2 and k = 10?
Merineth
yeah
the thing is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stars_and_bars_(combinatorics) on wikipedia they have this
In the context of combinatorial mathematics, stars and bars (also called "sticks and stones", "balls and bars", and "dots and dividers") is a graphical aid for deriving certain combinatorial theorems. It can be used to solve many simple counting problems, such as how many ways there are to put n indistinguishable balls into k distinguishable bin...
which is the correct thing
(but they swap k and n)
oh right i see that
so it might be complicated. But just in case, screenshot this
it's not using k and n
just what it's supposed to be
Okay that does clarify a lot tbh
Let me test it
Determine the amount of integer solutions to the difference \$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4 < 40$ which holds the following condition :
a) $x_i \ge 0 $ for $i = 1,2, \dots , 5$
This seems to be a stars and bars problem?
Where k would be 40 and n = 4
$\binom{k+n-1}{k} = \binom{40+4-1}{40} = \binom{43}{40}$
Merineth
uh
Hmm wait that might not be right because of the "<" ?
my bad , sorry
Merineth
ok so
if it was "=" would i have the right asnwer?
one where it's 39, one where it's 38 .. etc?
or actually
well this COULD work
but there's a prettier way
imagine you do have 40 stars
oh well actually
let's say we have 39
since x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 <= 39 right?
Yeah
so
for each star, you can either place it in one of the 4 boxes
or you can place it outside
and make "outside" become a 5th box
Yeah someone mentioned earlier "outside" but i'm having a hard time digesting that
and the problem becomes x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 = 39
How would adding a new x5 determine the amount of solutions?
look at what we've been doing
each of the 39 stars that didn't get into one of the 4 boxes
we just group them together and we call them a new box, x_5
Ok
ok
Merineth
yep
the right answer should be 44C39
there is a hint given in the book
"The differences can be formulated as the equation x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6 = 40 where x6 has to be x6 > 0"
it doesin't say
I would have agreed if the original problem was x1 + ... + x5 < 40
but it's x1 + .... + x4 < 40
oh wait... did you not copy it correctly?
it says xi >= 0 for i = 1,2,3,4,5
yeah sorry damn
it was an x5 also
but the same method applies like you said
by introudcing a new box
Why does it work by introducing a new box?
Does the new box just represent when there are leftovers?
5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 15 = 40
Where 15 is x_5 which makes it possible for us to calculate all the possible solutions including those that are > 40 ?
How did you come up with that idea?
I think changing the inequality f(x) <= k to f(x) + r = k is commonly known as using slack variable
because when r is positive integers, you are consider the case of k - 0, k - 1, k - 2, ...
I’ve never heard of that before hmmm
It is common in optimization field
Optimization field? 
I Will just have to remember how its solved I guess😞
Thanks rafil for the help
.close
Closed by @gilded hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How many different arrangements can be formed from the letters PARALELLOGRAM if
a) the four L cannot be placed next to each other
I dont want to the solution i just want to know if i'm thinking right
First i want to find out how many possible arrangements of the L i can make, right?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Since we have 14 spots in total and the condition is that they aren't next to each other means we have 7 spots right? Meaning that the placement of the L's are 7C4 ?
let me know if you believe otherwise but I don't believe that that is correct since you don't know where the Ls are to start with
so you don't know which spots to avoid
this does not seem right and you can do an easy sanity check for this, just fix the first 2 L's as 1st and 3rd position and count the number of positions available for the 3rd L
ok.. i'll rethink brb
The absolute total amount of permutations that can be made are 14P14 = 14!
Since i know this, it might be possible to find out the conditions for when the L's are next to each other and subtract those from the total?
nvm
$\frac{14!}{4!3!2!} - \frac{11!}{3!2!}$
Merineth
Closed by @gilded hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@sullen leaf Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@sullen leaf Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For trapezoidal/midpoint rules, how am I supposed to find K for the error bound formulas?
I understand that it has to do with f''(x) but that's really all I know
take something like this for example
i find the 2nd derivative right
which would be this
but then i don't understand where to go from here
nvm, i somewhat figured it out
actually
no
I still don't understand the a <= x <= b
I'm plugging in |f''(a)| or |f''(b)| for k but it isn't correct
@fair oasis Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not sure why these zeros aren't working, i even checked on a graphing calculator and the only zeros are -4 and 2
enter all answers, including repetitions
-4 is a root that's repeated twice
so they want the answer as 2, -4, -4
Closed by @summer hearth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Coefficent of x⁹⁹ in (x-1)(x-2)....(x-100)
Is it 5050 or -5050?
How can we know for sure?
?
First tell me how you got 5050
(x-1)(x-2)...(x-100) is a polynomial whose roots are 1,2,...,100
So 1+2+...+100= -coefficientof x⁹⁹/1
Coefficient of x⁹⁹=-5050
But answer given is 5050
It’s wrong
This is correct
Ok
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
.close
Closed by @dark ingot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How is P(Z <= 3.33) = 0.9996?
what are you confused about?
According to the table, there are 311 places where z ≤ 3.33, and the total times are 315
@vernal grove Has your question been resolved?
I dont know how one would solve P(Z <= 3.33) using that specific table
how did you even find that out though? there are no rows for 3.3
note this table represents P(Z>a) where a is a given value in the table
so you would first find P(Z>3.33)
do you see why this would help?
oh but even then how would you find P(Z>3.3) I am still lost
like there is no row for 3.3 in that table...
you would estimate it i suppose
how would I do that
halfway point between 0.001 and 0.0001 is
,calc 0.00135+0.000233
or i gues it would be
233
Result:
0.001583
,calc 1- (0.00135+0.000233)
Result:
0.998417
hm
oh shit wth
Closed by @vernal grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, im trying to solve this problem and I understand that the vertical asymptote is x = -4 because x cannot be -4 in the denominator. However, how would I know which of these graphs is the correct answer?
is the graph negative at any point?
am i supposed to know that based on the function?
i would look at the denominator
i used the denominator to find the vertical symptote
but i forgot how i would know what the graph looks like
consider h(x) = (x+2)^2
what can you say for h(x) in terms of whether it is ever negative
its never negative
3 is a positive constant right?
i know h(x) is never negative because anything sqaured is positive
but not the 3/h(x)
correct
a positive divided by a positive still yields a positive
ahh ok
so if we apply that logic here
if (x+4)^2 is always positive
then 3/(x+4)^2 is always positive
👍
gotcha
can you help me with 1 more thats similar
this one is a bit more complicated
sure
cool ill send a pic one sec.
so for this one its a bit more complicated
i have no idea where to start
like i was gone for a few days from class so im not sure if its in my notes tbh
can you first try factorising that
-4 (x -2) (x + 1)
👍
(x+4) (x-4)
ok so we know where the asymptotes are
which is x = +-4
more importantly, have you dealt with thinking about the graph as they approach x = +- infinite?
i somewhat recall that, but its hard to rememeber
ok we can do this step by step
so both the numerator and denominator contain x^2 term right?
correct, so to find horizontal asymptote it's the ratio of the coefficients
and we know that x^2 is much larger than x as x approaches infinite, regardless of which direction
yep
so then we only care about -4x^2/x^2
so the horizontal asymptote would be y = -4 ?
yep
correct
since its the only one with a line through y = -4
i see, i guess my teacher is mostly just testing us if we know
H.A / V.A
with the graphs
instead of actually graphing it
atm
thanks for your help sir
@kindred flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Write out the lower and upper sums for f(x)=1/x in the interval [1,3] where the length of each small interval is 1/2
so just wanted to confirm that it's $\frac{1}{2}(1+ \frac{2}{3}+ \frac{1}{2} + \frac{2}{5}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
right?
@sharp smelt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@vast berry Has your question been resolved?
@vast berry Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@vast berry Has your question been resolved?
I haven't done matrices in a while so forgive me for any mistake
i think its is because y = -3x is an eigenvector, meaning that while the line remains invariant, the vectors need not
so like the point (-3, 1) could change under the matrix to (-6, 2), or (3, -1) and the line would still be invariant, but the vector muliplies by some constant number, lambda. In this case tho, I think it just so happened that the eigenvalue, lambda is equals to 1.
@vast berry Has your question been resolved?
how do i know y=-3x is an eigenvector? ty
it's because that line is invariant under the transformation M
meaning when you apply M, the vectors along the line y=-3x only get multiplied by a scalar
ohh
.close
Closed by @vast berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I get y by itself here
(-1/y) = x^3 + C
Inverse and multiply by -1?
I can give a solution but try first yourselfff
Idk where they got y=0
ignore that
bet
Its answer not solution
potato, tomato
Potato and tomato are different af
i disagree
You whaaat?
depends
You are guys geniuses
@royal frost Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @royal frost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
was trying to solve this by a different way -i already solved it using riemann sun and integration xsinx....- but i said why not take a different approach and use tylor summation of sin(x) and approximating kpi/n+1 =~ kpi/n -idk if its possible or not -
would it be possible ?
i tried taking first three termes from tylor series , and transformed them to integral through riemann sum
i noticed a pattern getting reapted, can we turn it into summation
im jst playing around, idk if what im doing is mathematically correct but when solving integral with integral calculator im getting a close answer to (1/pi) which is the correct answer
this integral by taking first 5 termes in tylor series, so can we make a summation of all termes ? and integrate it
if dominated convergence theorem verefied or smthing like that
<@&286206848099549185>
i kinda thought of smting like this, but uhhhh i dont think it works
@inner galleon Has your question been resolved?

@inner galleon Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
nah i dont think you can create a sum like that
alright, do u think this approach is correct or nop. im jst playing 
hmmm not sure you should keep exploring if that interests you, I only did that usin riemann sums
but if you skip riemann sum I guess there wont be any integration
its definetly solvable w/o integrals
ye i did with riemann sums too , but i wonder if i can reach to the same result by expanding sin(....) using tylor series and do some bunch of stuff
jst wanted to play with riemann sums and integration since im not quite used to them, and i wonder if m other approach is valid or nop
@inner galleon Has your question been resolved?

@inner galleon Has your question been resolved?
it is correct yeah
using the dominated convergence theorem as you said
although shouldn't it be x+1 rather than x in the denominator?
it definitely seems harder to evaluate than using the fundamental theorem of calculus on x sin(pi x)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need answer asap
whats the answer
been tyring for hrs and need to sumbit asap
<@&286206848099549185>
did you write the integrand as a power series first?
please wait 15 minutes before pinging Helpers, in the future
what did you get for your integrand after expressing it as a power series?
well no one's gonna just give you the answer, that's not how this server works
.close
Closed by @hallow condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does this become 60x^2 y^8
I understand the correct formula for the fifth term but I don’t know how it becomes 60x^2 y^8
Can someone show me the steps?
iirc, Pascal's triangle is really useful here
I was using his triangle and it doesn’t make sense here
60x^2 y^8 ain’t even on here
I don’t understand
@teal hare Has your question been resolved?
the triangle just gives you the binomial coefficients, so you’d use it to find 6C4
the rest of the factors comes from 2² and then the x and y comes form the rest of the formula
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a doubt in this solution that how do we know before solving that only one squared term will have x? Is there any way to know this or is it just a matter of hit and trial until we get the correct pair of squares?
Is there any common format for the expression that we will get by squaring and adding 2 terms which are Ax + By + C form so that we can use that to know if x is there in both terms on only one of them?
@stray scroll Has your question been resolved?
Or can anyone please tell me where else should I ask this question?
@stray scroll Has your question been resolved?
@stray scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know how to find it if it's variables such as m but Is it the same with numbers?
Yes
like consider (9-2)^7
So 5th term will be 7C4 9^7-4 2^4
If you do the binomial expansion and add every term it will eventually equally to 7^7
One moment imma try
See take (4-2)^2
So the expansion will be 2C0 4^2 (-2)^0+ 2C1 4^1 (-2)^1 + 2C2 4^0 (-2)^2
Now see first term is equal to 16 second is equal to -16 and 3rd is equal to 4 so
16-16+4 is 4
Which is in fact (4-2)^2 i.e (2)^2=4
@teal hare
@teal hare Has your question been resolved?
Sorry I was trying my best but I didn't get it, I'll take a look at your exampkle
What do the c's mean exactly?
its okay Ill come back in a little bit
.close
Closed by @teal hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I can do it for u wait a sec
Thanks
Let D be the intersection of the height in C
AD=x, BD=50-x
Then you can make two equations with two variables
With tangent
Yeah, it’s just for the facility of naming it
Opp/adj
Yeah
Oh do I like factor out the x
That’s what I have
Well don’t know what u mean
Then u already have it
Oh
Note that u have not divided entirely by tan80
So it should not be done that way, RHS should be x(tan70+tan80)
Where did u get 86, I thought it was 80
Well yea, if u typed in 86 then u have double error
@dry wren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This has me lost
7b
the right hand side is simple
but the left hand side is like
oh wait never mind
.close
Closed by @dense iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Ok I am extremely lost in 7b
ive gotten to the point
that ln(p) - ln(10000-p) = 1/200t + c
It helps because we're getting closer to "p"
Oh I need the p value?
Like that throws me off cause it keeps it in terms of p in the question
Yeah, it even said in the question: "give the answer in the form p = ..."
uh ok
Basically, instead of solving for x, we're solving for p
so I got
p + 2500p = 2500000
idk if i can factorise p to (2500+1) tho
that seems wrong
You definitely can
oh ok
1 thing + 2500 thing = 2501 thing
I get a rly long decminal number tho
if I am to divide through
yh
i mean
I get p = 250000/2501
and have no idea what to do with that
@dense iris Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @dense iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone ever done a question like this?
Are these marks your attempts?
Never mind it works, though it's quite a bit more than necessary
What's your question exactly?
@sterile osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello fellow helpers
I have a calculus question
I am studying integrals, but before moving forward I need to resolve a question about the dy/dx notation
what I came up with is the following:
The formula for the slope of a line is 🔺y / 🔺x. Now since the derivative is the same equation only when 🔺x tends to 0, I concluded that dy = 🔺y when it approaches 0 and that dx= 🔺x when it tends to 0. Basically, dy/dx is the same as saying 🔺y/🔺x only that by saying dy/dx we are implicitly saying that they are VERY small values. Therefore, since they are finite values, they can be treated as numbers and can be solved (for example, by solving dx of dy we get the differential of the function)
is this correct?
yes, by the limit definition of a derivative
tell me more about it
delta x and delta y are really small numbers yes
I really need to master this topic
$f'(a) = \lim_{b\to a} \frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}$
artemetra
$\approx \frac{\Delta f(x)}{\Delta x}$
artemetra
like it's the same thing but taking the limit of the difference of both things
lol sorta
so is this correct?
at least for now
like could you define with your own words what a differential is
yes
it's an informal way of saying the same thing as this
like one to one
@round tide Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm confused by what they mean by formula here?
It's not a matrix is it?
for x y and z
I followed the note and got
$\begin{matrix}
XA & 0\
0 & ZC
\end{matrix}$
unbearablefrequentist1
that's not the product of the left side
and by formula, they mean that each entry of the correct product will equal the entries of the matrix on the right.
So you'll have XA = I, for example.
really? Do I have the form incorrect?
your bottom left entry should not be 0
Like X = XA = I ?
where I the Identity matrix
No, X does not need to equal XA.
If you do the product. You'll get XA in the top left spot. That should equal the matrix on the right, which has the identity matrix in the top left spot. So those are equal. i.e. XA = I
Oh interesting
If I understood, you're saying XA = the whole Identity matrix on the rhs?
What do you mean by 'whole identity matrix'
Okay it's kind of weird because the rhs looks just like the identity matrix. You're saying XA = I or XA = rhs?
$\begin{bmatrix} a & b\c& d\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} w & x\y& z\end{bmatrix} \implies a=w, b=x, c=y, d=z$
Zybikron
I'm saying the top left entry of lhs equals the top left entry of rhs,
XA = I
So they want you to find X, Y, and Z in terms of A, B and C
Before I continue then, what part of the matrix that I computed was incorrect?
bottom left
since we established that the top left element was XA, would X = XA = I?
would that be the formula
No
darn
why would X = XA?
All you have is XA = I, from that you should be able to work out how X and A are related.
almost. You can't divide by a matrix, you'd use the inverse.
I did that because you mentioned "..how X and A are related"
ohhh
how would you get the Inverse of A
X= A^-1
I have a theorem,
$A^-1 = \frac{1}{ad-bc}
\begin{matrix} d & -b\ -c & a {matrix}\end$
unbearablefrequentist1
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
I give up on making that
I think I'm gonna close this
clearly I'm missing a lot more than what I was given
.close
Closed by @polar steppe
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For integers n
Can someone help me with this?
I just need to simplify it I think
Maybe the limit in +infinity and that sequence is decreasing will show that its roofed by the first term which is 9/11 < 1
How would you simplify ?
Like 3n < n^2 +2
-n^2 +3n -2 < 0 ?
Yep
And study when this is negative ?
Yes but I'm not sure how
Will give us $-(n-1)(n-2)$
YakuBros
I divided by -1 to get $n^2-3n+2>0$
DapperJaguar197
Works too
Idk how to apply the 2 factors to get a solution for n tho
You have 1 and 2 as roots
So the quadratic is positive on [2,+inf) but n > 2 so its strict positive
Is n>1 also true? Or do both have to be satisfied?
n has to be n > 2 as said in the exercice statement
The quadratic is positive for all n > 2, and the exercice supposed it so we have proved that its true
It wont work for n >1 cuz for n=2 we have 6/6 which is equal to 1 and not striclty less
As asked
Closed by @lethal stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can you show the whole work please ?
Ok ok
What is px ?
So 20 - 2x - Lpx = 0
-Lpx = 2x -20
L = (20 -2x)/px , indeed
I hope too,
hello, i'm new here
Welcome then !
Thx!!
Closed by @signal forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
If you need help with maths problem, you can ask in the free-channels to get help
free-channels? where is it, you mean help-34 ...etc?
The not-occupied one/avaible
alright
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with matrices
Need to understand the manipulations and algebra
@wispy quail Has your question been resolved?
@feral sedge
a(bx+cy)^2-b(ax+by)(bx+cy)+(ax+by){b(bx+cy)-c(ax+by)}
is this laplace?
matrix, co-factor expansion
yup yup
factor out ax+by?
can't be done
I'd say, distribute it all out and see if you can look for factors of b^2-ac
pain
could try to get wolfram to distribute it lol
maybe there's something better I don't know about, I'm not a huge linear algebraist
idk why this problem exists in my textbook
it's supposed to be high-school stuff
i learned matrix operations
to make zeros
this is unfair

btw, it's getting nasty in the distribution
@feral sedge
ac2y2+ab2x2-a2cx2-b2cy2
ax2(b2-ac)-cy2(b2-ac)
i dont get this
i get something similiar, but not exactly.
do you have the 2bxy?