#help-38
1 messages · Page 137 of 1
Yea
Ok thanks
Yes
30°
Yea
And 330?
Should write jn radian form though
How many degrees is one quadrant?
Yea
90
270?
Yea
So 300° then
In radian form?
Yea
5π/3
Yea
I thought to get the answer in another quadrant that you took the answer away from the quadrant
Like 360-30
This is not how it's done
So you just add 90 for how many quadrants it's going up
Yeap
So this is wrong then?
Yea it's wrong
It would be 120 and 30°
Same domain
Yea then thiss is true
Thankyou
Yw
Closed by @vast bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Uh
can you rotate ?
Yeah
,rotate
Oh
Idk if i even drew it correctly
I struggle with interpreting questions like this
The distance away from the tower stays constant
Oh
your diagram implies he moves backwards
Here let me try changing it
it should be like this
no
The towers taller than 45m
First measurement measures 45m mark
2nd measures top of the tower
and both measurements are taken from 1.3m above ground
Sorry the paper is so dirty, its been a headscratcher for a bit
O
Oh youre right
I fixed the diagram but
How would i solve for the tower height
Given the first measurement, what can you work out?
You have the angle and the height
So with angle and height i could either figure out the adjacent side or the hypo side
Which would help with finding the height of the other measurement
how would the hypotenuse help?
Im getting the adjacent for the other triangle
Which i could use to math the other x
With the angle and adjacent angle
Yes
Since it would be Opposite divided by adjacent
I did it before but it just didnt seem right
Did you minus 1.3 from 45?
Whyd you use sin?
The a of the second triangle should be the same as the a for the first triangle
the difference is in the o
Wasnt i supposed to find the H for the first triangle then use that as the A of the second triangle
In order to find the O
OH WAIT
I GET IT
Give me one second
Mb
noo you want to find how far away the observer is 😭
horizontal distance from the tower
YEAH I JST REALIXED IM SO SLOW
ITS 75M
AYO
Im like
Super sliw
I SWEAR IM SMART(cap) ITS JUST LIKE 3AM FOR ME
I was doing my assignment 😔 cuz its due
ANYWAY TY
.close
Closed by @tidal pagoda
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
👍
.close
Closed by @fast tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Have a nice day
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would you go about solving this?
That was how I went about it as well, actually. I was wondering if there was some quicker way that involved finding a common multiple of 8 and 3? There was some approach that worked as such
Ah thank you.
@frank haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i cant find the sum of b and c
Remember the Taylor series for sin x
@frank merlin Has your question been resolved?
why is it divided by 3 tho
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would the answer be: A
yes
Closed by @urban wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
i think
q4 doesn't seem right
double check the problem
^
no im sure its right i double checked wit my friend
And I'm sure it's wrong 
and im sure ur wrong
check segment lengths again
bruhhh
LOOOOOOL
i thought you double checked WITH your friend
check $AC$ and $BC$
nameless individual
its scaline right
no its not
scalene*
no its not
Closed by @urban wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
i wanna be sure
it is
make sure to talk to your friend about this
nice username btw
its all correct afaik
@urban wasp Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @urban wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this valid?
i think it's probably (a-b)(a+b)=a^2-b^2 but i just dont see it
,, a - b = \f {a^2 - b^2} {a + b}
Closed by @fair forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given to random variables. Does it hold that if X is independent of Y, that X² is also independent of Y?
And if how do you prove it?
Unravel definitions? Im stuck at the following:
E(X)*E(Y)= E(XY); And E(X²*Y)= E(X*X*Y)= E(X*(XY))= Cov(X,XY)-E(X)E(XY)=Cov(X,XY)-E(X)E(X)E(Y)
Cause what I want to achieve is something to use the Expected Value with
try not using expected values
just work with the probability that the variables take a given value
So P(XeA, Y²eA)=P(XeA YeSqrt(A))=P(XeA)*P(YeSqrt(A))=P(XeA)*P(Y²eA)?
this is literally illegible
X element A, Y element B is the notation our prof uses sorry. It means the set of w for which holds: X(w) is element of A.
ah
broadly correct but sqrt(A) is the sqrt of a set here which isn't actually defined by default
so you should define just like, B
where B = {b st. b^2 = a for some a in A}
Closed by @wooden topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find the number of real solutions for the equation $$4x + cos^2(x) = 0$$
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
someone is saying that using bolzano theorem we can justify that the root exist
and showing that is strictly increasing we can argue that the solution is unique
but idk
how to do that
I'd first find the limits at $-\infty$ and $\infty$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
no
the key here is to see that there's ATLEAST one real root
from the limits alone
wdym
what's the limit at -infty
I wanted to ask, is this finding the vertical asymptotes or
well
,, \lim_{n \to \pm \infty} 4x + \cos^2(x)
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
cos is bounded
I don't know much about asymptotes
yes but it's roughly -\infty
and \infty
right?
sure
that means?
isnt cos oscilating between -1 and 1 or
it is
is that sin or
not sure tbh
there's one zero between -\infty and \infty
now check if it's monotonic
we need to differentiate
do what can you infer from that?
,w differentiate cos^2(x)
what's sin(2x)
,w sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)
I didnt know
this is an important formula, you better learn it $sin(2x)=2sin(x)cos(x)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
so what's the differential ?
yes
yes!
the function is continuous on $\R$, yes?
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
well
cosine is bounded
4x is a polynomial of degree 1 coefficient 4
should be continuous AFAIK
well
in order to use ivt we need f to be continuous in a closed interval lowkey
one of the corollaries from ivt is bolzano theorem
well assuming we can use IVT on open intervals, what would be the procedure?
I am getting confused a little bit
honsetly I've only studied the IVT informally
so I don't think I should help
sorry
I am studying it formally and I still dunno whats going on here
well
problem is to show that the root is unique
well in order to show the function it is monotonically decreasing we need to inspect the derivative 4 - sin(2x)
I mean
we need to find the critical points as well
I mean at the very least absolute maxima and absolute minima
idk this exercise is too complicated, please ping with hints and ideas
@urban copper Has your question been resolved?
@urban copper Has your question been resolved?
If youre function is monotonically decreasing or increasing, continious on
[a, b] and the root is in [f(a), f(b)] (or [f(b),f(a)] ) then the root is unique
Yes its how to deal with the question
You can use the limit aswell
Since 0 is in (-inf,inf) you can argue that there is only a unique root to this function
@urban copper Has your question been resolved?
why
Cuz 0 is in the interval
Its a bijection due to strictly monotonic behaviour of the function
which interval
injection not bijection
injection can be implied from the monotonic increasing functino
but wdym bijection, how
I am getting confused
(-inf, +inf)
okay
Yes bijection cuz 0 is in the interval of the limit
Its a corollary of IVT
Due to monotonic behaviour
Dont know if there is a special name in english too, but its also called "bijection theorem"
Added to all the other things i said its a bijection
@urban copper Has your question been resolved?
.solved
Closed by @urban copper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
dang i always use this without proving
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
do you know induction?
i do but i still need handholding
maybe I simply dont?
Let this be True and show that its True for ( n+1)
Crazy
why does that seem crazy?
I cant really explain induction, but in this case its pretty straightforwaed
- for n=1 we have 1 = (1+1)/2 (this step is easy, always crucial, sometimes you do like n=5 depends on a problem)
- Suppose statement is true for some n. Lets show rhats its true for n+1.
In this case you should do it that way:
1+…+n+1 = 1+…+n+n+1 and keep going from there
keep going from there?
ye becuz jsut like in the picture (n+1) is continously goin in nth number times
well because statement is true for n then 1+…+n+n+1= n(n+1)/2 + n+1
y0shi
using the formula ofc
i remember this was my first ever proof by induction i did, like my 1st year in high school
i couldnt understand why does it work
The legend say that its 10yo gauss that discovered this formula
he really did
Not like fermat and his great theorem kekw
Show that its works for n=0 first since n is positive integers its the initialisation
Then assume that the statement given is true
And show that its true for n+1
So you write the formula
You add both sides n+1
So in the right side you have n(n+1)/2 + n+1
You put under common denominator
ohh Vietnamese?
how u know 🤔🤔
It will give you [n(n+1)+2n+2]/2
Top of paper
i mean the language 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Then you factor, so its (n+1)(n+2)/2
And job is done cuz if we have Sn = n(n+1)/2
Sn+1 = (n+1)(n+2)/2
So its true for all n, natural numbers
Imagine induction like dominos (not pizza) you push the nth dominos so the (n+1)th fall too
@urban copper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is wrong with this?
$\int \sin^3{x} \cos^3{x} dx \$
$\int \sin^2{x} \cos^2{x} \sin x dx \$
$\int (1- \cos^2 x) \cos ^2 {x} \sin dx \$
$u = \cos x \$
$du = -\sin x dx \$
$-du = \sin x dx \$
$-\int (1-u^2) u^2 du \$
$-\int u^2 - u^4 du$
like is this correct so far?
Tomi
<@&286206848099549185>
Looks like a cos went missing after the first line
so it should have been u to the power of 3, right?
hi
@random niche Has your question been resolved?
@random niche Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @random niche
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is more of a conceptual question. today i spent some time with my physics teacher and he asked me a question that is mostly conceptual and theoretical, i have been thinking about it but havent gotten anywhere so any hints or guiding me in the right direction would be amazing.
why do we differenciate functions? its more like what purpose does this serve in the real life (physics application). like obv to find the slope or rate of change, but thats a mathematical answer. whats the real reasons equations in the real world use differentiation
<@&286206848099549185>
yes what's up how can I help
As many things in mathematics, this is the reasonning we are searching for, obviously to buy bread at bakery you wont use derivatives, but the man who invented the atm where you withdraw money do.
Devolopping something may find an apply but not neccessarly, we use derivatives in financial to find out the most benefit of a production for example
Get meteo previsions also
Earthquake preventive too
possibly some context will make answering this question easier. he taught us a condition under which you can determine if something is a wave, and it was for function f(x, t), after double partial differentiation, (d^2y)/(dx)^2 = k (d^2y)/(dt)^2. i then asked him why double differentiation and he said to answer tthat you need to understand why we differentiate things in the first place
Oh, wouldnt he wanted to bring the initial purpose which is to find out variation ?
what?
im sorry i dont understand
The first derivative is to find the variation of the function
The second derivative is to find the variations of the first derivatives, so when the slope of tangent are increasing or decreasing
yeah
i get the maths behind it
but under what situation in real life
would you think of using derivatives
how does it manifest in the physical world
Hum..
For common people, they dont need derivatives in the absolute
But all science does use it
Even sociology
My Real Analysis teacher said that we basically try to study complicated things and understand them by approximating them and getting information about them from simpler functions.
Thats what derivatives do
But yeah its not for a regular person, regular person does nit need derivatives
@outer cradle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
so its useful for approximation and understanding complex functions?
what about it allowing us to understand things that might be very fast
and taking derivative gives info about that, which we might not have been able to do otherwise
Thats what he told us
what do you mean very fast
hmm
im just thinking
at very fast and ig even very slow speeds for example
it might be hard to visually make out the difference
but its easier and more clear if you differentiate it
oh also i was just thinking
technically wouldn't differenciation also reduce the error in our results
cause if we have a function f(t) where t is like +- 0.1 and f(t) = t^4
the error will be smaller if you work with the differenciated function
look
derivatives and integrals constitute real analysis
which is a very important field
they help us find ROCs and net changes of functions, and how much they change
any serious application will require a lot of complicated maths
e.g. in chemistry and physics we use a lot of differential equations to figure stuff out
how something moves or what the force on something is going to be
e.g. what the impact force on a car is going to be at a point, and thus what parts we need to reinforce
or aerodynamics
hmm
or neural networking
okay
etc
cool
ye
thanks for this stuff guys
np
.close
Closed by @outer cradle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain why this is wrong? do i need to show my working out
Not sure, looks like there's a hole in the graph at x=4 and no other defined point, so f(4) should not exist.
Can f(4) exist and be below -3?
Can you put a wider image with all the context?
maybe the teacher wanted you to write undefined?
could be being picky on DNE and undefined
@uncut cedar Has your question been resolved?
If there is not any other relevant information then, what you should have answered is “Undefined” as y0shi said, and not DNE
On the other hand, if f(4) is defined somewhere else in the exercise, then you should find it there.
But, according to the graph, it is just undefined.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@bold rune Has your question been resolved?
construct a system of equations.
You know the total number of tickets sold was 350, which creates one equation, and the total revenue of 12520 combined with the cost per ticket gives you a second equation
Ok wait
Well know i know x=5
what is x?
.close
Closed by @bold rune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, how would you demonstrate this property of divisibility?
@faint fulcrum Has your question been resolved?
what is the mcd?
greatest common divisor?
yes
but I was able to do it anyway
thanks anyway
.close
Closed by @faint fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
z
what happens when a = c
gcd is a in tesis?
yes
nope
@faint fulcrum Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @faint fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've defined $x_{n+1} = \s{2 + x_n}$, I just need to figure out how I'd show the sequence is bounded
argon
$x_n<???\implies x_{n+1}<???$
kheerii
proof by induction esentially
the sequence increases
yes but it converges to a particular value
I’m not so sure about induction tbh. There’s a more clever way to solve this and ofc once we find a solution, there’s a way to verify it rigorously with the definition of convergence
what's that value?
Yeah I mean I could do that but
This exercise is on the monotone convergence theorem
So I guess I should do that 😓
$x_n<2\implies x_{n+1}<2$
Done quite a few eps-N proofs already
kheerii
this is what I meant
use this definition
x_1 = sqrt(2)
it still satisfies x_n<2
$x_n<2\implies 2+x_n<4\implies \sqrt{2+x_n}<2\implies x_{n+1}<2$
kheerii
Closed by @frozen plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
then just monotone converge proves this right?
just prove x_{n+1}>x_n from here
Looks like 2*cos pi/2^n
uhh
yep that works too I think
I did something similar a few years ago
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help please
do you know the formula for the volume of a cylinder?
and it is?
Pie x l x w?
wrong
Then idk...
πr²h
oh
do you want to know how that came? it always comes in handy
ok
what is the area of a circle?
Pie Radius Square
correct
now, could you imagine a cylinder as multiple circles stacked up on each other?
yh
and, the height of your cylinder is h, so basically the pi * radius squared is stacked up until it covers a length of h
oh
yes
288
correct
So is that the answer?
yep
yes
tysm!
no problem
.close plz
AYY!
please type .close
@wraith hinge could you type .close? ^
Closed by @glad river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this Truth Table correct
No. I would recommend splitting it further since you jump from $p\rightarrow q$ to $(p\land (p\rightarrow q))\rightarrow q$ directly, which makes it more likely to commit mistakes. You can use the layout in this image.
Crystopher
not to be rude or anything but i cant really see what you wrote
Understandable, how about now?
yes, it looks correct, you see that the statement was in fact a tautology.
i have some other problems if you dont mind checking them out
should probably clarify financial security/gambling is 5, new taxes is 6, godzilla is 7
in 5 it is hard to see how you 'translated' the statements, can you elaborate?
6 seems correct
7 seems wrong at first sight to me. I also have some doubts about the interpretation of the statements
I know you are trying to prove $p$ there, but how did you symbolically interpret statements 1 and 2?
Crystopher
with tose i mean these
The first statement asserts that if p (you are a gambler) is true, then ¬q (you do not have financial security) must also be true.
The second statement simply states that ¬q (you do not have financial security) is true.
idk if that helps explain it
not a good explainer when it comes to math
so \
$1. p\rightarrow \lnot q$\
$2. \lnot p$
Crystopher
yes
What I see in the upper row of this table is the following:\
$p$\
$q$\
$\lnot q$\
Crystopher
$p\lnot q$\
$\lnot q$\
$p$
Crystopher
specially, $p\lnot q$ makes no sense.
Crystopher
gotcha
was that supposed to mean $p\rightarrow \lnot q$?
Crystopher
ya i think i made a mistake on that
in such case, the there's a row wrong in that table.
could you help me establish the truth table
and then i can do the T's and F's on my own
just so i get the basic form of it i guess is what im trying to say
When starting out with these you should make many columns, else you commit mistakes easily. Like you know the truth value of operations like $\lnot p$, $p\land q$, $p\lor q$ and $p\rightarrow q$. These are fairly simple and should be easy to memorize and 'apply' directly. But when you do more complex expressions it is best to break it into several parts (at least until you are more confident).
Crystopher
for instance, instead of directly finding values of $p\rightarrow \lnot q$ you find $\lnot q$ first, then you don't need to mentally change the truth value of the entries in the $q$ column and directly doing implication. Then, instead of directly trying to see values of $\lnot q \land (p\rightarrow \lnot q) \rightarrow p$ you find first the values of $\lnot q \land (p\rightarrow \lnot q)$. This way makes you write more columns but at the same time the risk of doing something wrong diminishes a lot.
Crystopher
is ~q still FTFT
yes
what
don't remember the command for that
it is possible to rotate the images in Discord using some command
last column wrong, once again I recommend you to use the entire table I provided.
oh wait shoot i missed something
you missed the column for $\lnot q \land (p\rightarrow \lnot q)$, which was intended to be done first
Crystopher
yes, looks good
now what about 7
wait, it seems the table itself is correct, but what is concerning is how you interpreted the statements, although these are not so easy to translate symbolically
correction, I got different on this row
so the 5th row is wrong
yes, since $q$ is true there, so $(\lnot p \land r)\rightarrow q$ must be true regardless of $p$ and $r$
Crystopher
But a more pressing matter may be the interpretation, like how did you symbolically represent the statements and the conclusion.
ok i think i found the problem for 7 on the 5th row
the last letter in the 5th row is a T not a F
yes, this being the reason
if the interpretation is correct, then yes.
what is it?
all cells look good
confirmed
Closed by @terse haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am thinking of how to deal with this fraction with negative sign
I mean I know I have to apply the negative exponent rule, to me the exponent 3 positive like in the second picture, so then I divide (1/1 / 1/3^3)^-2, but my confusion is, does the 3 should have the negative sign, if the negative sign is for the whole fraction?
$(\frac{a^n}{b^m})^p = \frac{a^{np}}{b^{mp}}$
This is the property you should use I think
Josh ♚
mmm :/,
the thing is that the exponent outside the fraction is negative, does that property apply either way?
it does
so the result would be -1/729?
thanks
Make sure the result is positive.
both the numerator and denominator get the negative sign? or either when doing the division 1/1 1/3^3
As $\left( -3^3 \right)^{-2} = \left( -\frac{1}{3^3} \right)^{2} = (-\frac{1}{3^3}) \cdot (-\frac{1}{3^3}) = \frac{1}{3^6}$
eToThe2iPi
eToThe2iPi
ah. I was about to ask if there was a rule to get rid of it
is it 3^3 because it ends up like 3^3/1 = 3^3 right?
eToThe2iPi
I see, just switching, but in this case the result was because of the division 1/1 1/3^3, not because we decided to get rid of the two 1s, right?
.close
Closed by @sonic pilot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am i right? little iffy about directrix
Yes. The directrix essentially tells you in which direction the parabola opens
Closed by @barren crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
should i use trig sub for this?
would work yeah
@timber bronze Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @timber bronze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am i correct?
Looks right !
@barren crescent Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @barren crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone check if my answer is correct?
generally miles is mi, because m means meters
if you're not confident in your answer, you should show your work
@amber wolf Has your question been resolved?
@amber wolf Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @amber wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, can anyone help me understand this question, thanks
,rotate
Me and @wraith hinge Can assist you through this problem. What seems to be troubling you today?
?
it's asking you to prove this statement
We actually both looked at the problem and we are confused. Sorry.
What does it mean by draw a perpendicular line AE of length h, does it mean draw a line from A to D and d=h? And from d to D equaling p?
no it's saying to drop a perpendicular from A to BC, so a separate line segment
so draw another line from A to BC with the intersection at a new point E and then label the lengths AE=h and ED=p
So basically a straight line down from A and to B and C
right
onto the line BC
If you look at the vertex you can see l BD has an equilibrium balance to A (b)C, so therefore in this equation a*^2* = d*^2*
Is this what you mean?
yeah
So EC=2m-BE?
can you see what to do now?
you have two right triangles, so you should be able to just apply pythagorean theorem
How would I do D?
use pythagorean theorem on AED
to get d^2 in terms of p and h
and then you should be able to use algebra to reduce to the identity that you want
wait so you have a^2 = (m-p)^2+h^2, b^2 = (m+p)^2 + h^2, and d^2 = p^2 + h^2
so now reduce the equation a^2+b^2=2(d^2+m^2)
so that everything is in terms of p, h and m
and you should have reflexivity
What happens if the angle at A is a right angle? Would the theorem still work
yes, why wouldn't it
we didn't assume anything about the triangle
@echo linden Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
someone help me?
i dont think either is longer?
well the anwser is LK
wait
determine angles LKJ and JLK
the side opposing the larger angle will be longer
is this triangle possible?
wait i made an error
yeah u did
Weird enough
Let LKJ be x...
LJK be 90-x
L_K be 140-x...
L_J be 40+x
Let the two equal sides be y
y / sin 40 = LK/sin(140-x)
y/sin 50 = LJ/sin(40+x)
sin 50 / sin 40 = LK / LJ
LK > LJ...
the triangle cant existy
exist*
the only way for the line to bisect the hypotenuse is if the triangle is isoceles
which implies JL=LK
yeh
but if u work out the angles in the triangle
It didn't say anywhere that the line bisects...
which is 40,90,50 it says JL shou ld be longer
look at the diagram
but the sides are same
the 2 markers imply their lengths are the same
yeh
2 sides the same not equal the line bisecting the angle.
ah right i forgot the angle was 40
ffs
anyways the question answer is still wrong
It didn't say that the line forms right angle.
Hmm?
Don't presume the triangle is isoscele or that the line bisects the other line into two right angles.
Wait...
Is the triangle even possible?
Actually, there's an easy way.
Notice the circle you can draw over the triangles.
With JK being the line through the center.
his diagram is incorrect the third line isnt the same length as the other 2
Isn't it the norm that the diagrams might not be drawn to scale?
it is not know that the line that bisects the hypotenuse is the same length as the others
The assumption was LK≠JL so the bisect segment with JK can't be right angle
Don't you remember the circle property? Draw two lines from the line that passes through the center to cross each other and you got a right triangle exactly at the circle.
This?
yeah...
i barely know it, i never learned geometry
Uhh...
Yes
first time i encountered it was in complex numbers
This question should've been settled a long time ago and well... somehow it dragged on for so long lol.
You can use sine law or circle property to solve this.
@minor geode Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Consider the sequence: $a_n=6n+\frac{1}{n}$
lILi
I have an idea about it and I want to know if it works
I want to prove that the sequence is increasing by proving that the slope of the corresponding function is always positive on the interval [1, infinity)
I'm doing this by converting a sub n into a function f of x, taking the derivative of that function, turning that derivative into a sequence, and proving that the resulting sequence is bounded below 6 and above 5, and converges to 6
Would that logic be a viable proof that a sub n is increasing?
I'm in calculus 2
lILi
sorry for the adjustments
It suffices to take the derivative and show that it is always positive
Why do you want to bound b_n?
Oh, fair
Just wanted to prove that it's always positive but I realise now that doing it in such a way would be overkill
Thank you for confirming though
.close
Closed by @dreamy sleet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
isn't N(0,p) open by definition?
and?
because for any x in N(0,p)
because N(x,p) is contained in N(0,p)
so union of N(0,p) over all primes is also open
oh nvm, I read the end part incorrectly
.close
Closed by @uneven steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to find the last 5 or 10 or more digits of the number 2^12345 or any large number with 2^n where n is positive integer
like 2^32 = 4294967296 and the last 5 digits of it is 67296
you can do this lightning fast on a computer at least
what we want is like 2^(12345) mod 10^n for the first n digits
what we want is like 2^(12345) mod 10^n for the first n digits
well you can do it in roughly log_2(12345) computations. which is like 15 steps. its not that bad
see square-and-multiply
And I meant like mathematically not computationally
well depending on how big 10^n vs the exponent is, you can do some simplification with eulers theorem
but in the end you will have to compute stuff
.close
Closed by @sudden trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
already closed my bro
then why is it in occupied
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i have help with question B please
b) will be zero but assuming it is a not a typo. Otherwise you will need to find number of 40000 dollar payments
the awns key said 7
but idk how
like i got 5
I am having trouble understanding the question. It seems that she is receiving a payment of $40,000. This means the investment will never go to zero
I think it will be good to write down the expression for the couple of terms. That we can see any pattern
@deep mountain Has your question been resolved?
Jesse is investing 200 000 that is compounded
She then is given 40 000 out of that balance per year
@deep mountain Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @deep mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if e1 e2 e3 are eigenvalues of A, is (e1)^n (e2)^n (e3)^n eigenvalues of A^n
I just wanted to know
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Which of these is your situation?
I would like to know if that is true or not, i haven't gotten to proving it yet but knowing if its true or not would ease my calculations
It is
True
It's very easy to prove (btw if you search your question on the Internet you'd find plenty of results)
Start with the definition of eigenvector
Hence, if v is eigenvector for A, it means that ... @cobalt cloak
Ax=vx