#help-38
1 messages · Page 66 of 1
Yep
Wait so they’re all 90??
they couldn't be 90, they sould add up to 180, remember?
Oh sorry
X=60
Yep so now we find the sin cos and tan
For number 1 and 2 they’re both 60
we need the cos of BAD
did you do cos(60)?
yes, thats cos(30)
Yep
so, since the side is cut in half, we can confirm that the angle above it is also cut in half
since there's a straight line running from D to A
*keep in mind that this only works with equilateral triangles
well, wee need to find the angle BAD
and that's half of angle BAC
do you understand?
Yep
whats angle BAC?
we already figured it out that, it's angle A
180 would be a straight line
But each angles are 60
Ah yes
BA is 60 and D is 90 so 150?
Yeah
the points B, A and D cut the angle of 60 in half
So 30
So cos(30)
yes
0.86
So sin(30)
yes!
0.5
Sin(60)-cos(30)
yes!
1.11*10^-16
Aight thank you so much!
no problem!
Sorry if I took so much of your time
i'm not occupied with anything, don't worry about that ;)
Bye!!
bye :)
.close
Closed by @blazing quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know this limit is usually -inf. Is this a special case?
what is the notation $\log_{0,3}$ supposed to be saying
Log of base 0,3
for bases between 0 < a < 1 the logarithm effectively gets flipped across the x axis
so the limit diverges to infinity indeed
Closed by @velvet fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let OACB be the parallelogram to the right. The sides OB and BC are bisected
three equally long stretches where the dividing point P ∈ OB is closest to O, while
the dividing point Q ∈ BC is closest to C. Show that the points of intersection P′,
M and Q′ of the diagonal OC with the lengths AP, AB, and AQ respectively divide
this diagonal into four equally long parts.
Tip: Choose a = OA and b = OB as base. Due to the symmetry, it suffices to show that p′ = OP′=1/4OC=(a + b)/4
Express OP′ in two ways and take advantage of the fact that a and b are linearly independent.
Well, have you tried expressing OP′ in two ways?
Yes that's what you need to show
I honestly have no idea how i am supposed to prove this
I can clearly see that it is based on the picture :(
I'm not sure what you mean? P' can be expressed as OC/4
since i can see that the vector a + b = OC
however P' is 1/4 the way on OC
You can't use the result to prove itself
"P' can be expressed as OC/4" is the result you need to show
You can't use that
How do you express a point on a line?
Ideally using vectors
P' = OP + PP'
Ok but that's not really what I asked
Say I have a line that goes through the origin and a point (3,5)
How would you express another point on that line?
Uhm, i think i'd either multiply or divide the 3 and 5 by lambda, which iirc is the leaning coefficient
Right, can you write that using vectors?
3x + 5y
That's not a point
Then i don't know :(
You just said "multiply or divide the 3 and 5 by lambda", so why did you write x and y and no lambda?
I'm not sure, i was guessing
I just know that if i want another point on that vector, it needs to have the same incline/recline
so i take each x and y and multiply them by lambda
Ok, but that's not what you did with "3x + 5y"
a point (3,5)
multiply or divide the 3 and 5 by lambda
Come on, what does that give you?
lambda(3,5)
OK
So a point on the line that goes through the origin and (3,5) can be expressed as (3q,5q)
yes
Now in your problem, you are told to choose (OA, OB) as a base
Yes
Or rather {(OA, 0), (0, OB)} {OA, OB}, since it's a set of two vectors
What can you say about the diagonal OC
Well OC is (OA + OB)
What is the + doing here?
A summary of two vectors? I’m not sure.
I just know that the line starts at O and ends in C
Ok you need to use the base
the line splits the base in half
If {OA, OB} is your base, then A = (1,0) and B = (0,1), by definition
A point in the line would be q(x,y) or (qx, qy)
Again, why are you writing down x and y? We never mentioned them
Are you using OA and OB as vectors here?
I simply don't understand the question
That it can be writte as, (qOA +qOB) ?
That's actually correct, but I'm not sure you understand exactly why
That's because if i were for example multiply by q=0.5 i would get half the length of the total vector
Ok yeah but then why not just say qOC?
Yes
Ok let's do this in two ways, one using vectors only and the other using coordinates with the base {OA, OB}
So a point on OC can be qOC
In the base, OC = (1,1)
So a point on the line would just be q(1,1) = (q,q)
Does that make sense?
yes
Alright, so that's one way to express OP'
Now you need a second way
Do you understand why I asked how you can express a point on OC?
So we can find OP' ?
Right but precisely why express a point on OC?
Because P' can be expressed as a coordinate?
as OC/4
No
You went back to the result you need to prove
Again, you can't use that
It would make no sense to give an answer to the problem that way
Any point can be expressed with coordinates, you're just saying that P' is a point
Read the problem statement again and find how P' is defined
P' = qOC
The problem statement doesn't mention that
Then i have literally no clue
I don't even know what i'm trying to prove anymore. I'm trying to prove something that has already been proven?
This is a hint, it's not a definition, it has not been proven in any way
That's for you to do
That's the whole point of this problem
OP' = OC / 4
OQ' = 3(OC) / 4
OP' = OA + OB / 4
OQ' = 3(OA + OB) / 4
OP' = (OA/4) + (OB/4)
OQ' = (OA/4) + (OB/4)
OM = OC/4 = 1/4 * (OA+OB)
I don't know what you're trying to say
Me neither
I don't have a clue what i'm doing
I'm supposed to prove that AP, AB and AQ divide the thing into 4 equal parts
And then it says that because of the symmetry i only need to prove the formula
And give two ways on how OP' can be written
Yeah
OP = qOC is one way? And now i'm looking for another?
Yes
You understand that this is what you need to prove, yet you said P' is defined using this
That just doesn't work
P' has an actual definition in the problem statement
Yeah but i have absolutely zero clue what i'm doing
Give me the definition of P'
You can't just repeat yourself and expect me to say that's correct...
But i don't know what the def is?
By "problem statement" I mean everything above the hint
Where is P' mentioned in the problem statement?
It isn't`?
Let OACB be the parallelogram to the right. The sides OB and BC are bisected
three equally long stretches where the dividing point P ∈ OB is closest to O, while
the dividing point Q ∈ BC is closest to C. Show that the points of intersection P′,
M and Q′ of the diagonal OC with the lengths AP, AB, and AQ respectively divide
this diagonal into four equally long parts.
I don't see P'
Do you?
Only time it is mentioned is
Show that the points of intersection P′,
M and Q′ of the diagonal OC with the lengths AP, AB, and AQ respectively divide
this diagonal into four equally long parts.
How does that transle into a definition ?
It literally says "points of intersection", names P' among other points, as well as the relevant intersecting lines
Is that not a definition for you?
When two lines intersect, you can define a point as the intersection
I don't know how else to put it
You can rewrite the problem statement as a clear list of definitions and a "show something" at the end if you want
I just don't understand how someone can solve something they don't understand to begin with
How am i even supposed to elaborate to an answer when the question is so unclear
I mean... that's just reading comprehension
Just because it has maths in it doesn't make it a maths issue
So i just can't read?
- OACB is a parallelogram
- P is on OB such that 2OP = PB
- Q is on BC such that 2CQ = QB
- P' is the intersection of OC and AP
- Q' is the intersection of OC and AQ
- M is the intersection of OC and AB
- Show that OP' = P'M = MQ' = Q'C
This is what you should have understood from the problem
Yes i understand that
You do now or did you already earlier?
I did earlier
Then how did you not see the definition of P'
...
I'm not sure you do
I don't think guessing myway to an answer is how i solve something like this
The directive of the question is to unclear
"Show that OP' = P'M = MQ' = Q'C" like how? We can clearly see on the picture that it is
it even states that
OA, BC and OB and AC
are parallell to each other
So how am i supposed to prove something that clearly already has been proven in the statement in the quiestion
It's like someone asking; Prove that 2+2 = 4
A picture is not a proof? The equalities could be very close but not exact
They have to be the same
because it states
that they are divided into 3 exactly the same long
"The sides OB and BC are bisected
three equally long stretches"
With that info they have to be exactly 1/4 away from each other
Wdym these are not the same line segments
You're not making any sense
P is on OB
The question asks you to show something about P', which is on OC
If someone gave you a cube with each side are all the same length, And then they drew two vectors diagonally from each corner which resulted with a point in the middle. And then they ask, prove that the point in the middle is in fact in the middle
^ this is exactly how i feel about this assignment
The proof is already in the question to begin with since they say that p' = OP' = OC/4 = a+b/4
The parallelogram's sides are not all the same length, and P is not the intersection of the diagonals... You could say something like that for M, but not for P
You really need to differentiate between a hint and the actual problem statement
They never state that "p' = OP' = OC/4 = a+b/4" is true
They give you a hint that it should be true
Ok
I don't have a single clue on how to prove that then
It's completely incomprehensible to me
How am i supposed to understand this after >1 week into linear algebra
Well, the hint also says that you should express OP' in two ways, which is what we started to do earlier
This has little to do with linear algebra, it's a geometry problem, probably early high school level...
Great, guess i'm under high school level then
The only thing about linear algebra here is that they talk about a base, but you can easily solve this without using a base
I'm no teacher, but to me it feels like a tricky problem for an introduction to vectors
Assuming you learn about vectors early on in high school, yeah, that's high school level
P' is the intersection of OC and AP
This is what you need to use
If a point is the intersection of two lines, then it is on both lines at the same time
We showed earlier that, because P' is on OC, it can be expressed as qOC
Now, P' is also on AP, so... how else can it be expressed?
Clarification: the vector OP' can be expressed as q*OC
P' would be expressed with coordinates of some sort
(qOC, qAp)
where q is the point on the line P'
P' = q(OC, AP)
You keep mixing up different concepts... since when is q a point and P' a line?
Yes
OC and AP are both vectors
not coordinates
Earlier you found how to express a point on OC
Now you just need to find how to express a point on AP
OP' = qOC
isn't this a point on a vector?
What does that mean
qOC is a point on OP'
Ok don't mix up lines and vectors
Technically, OC is a distance
(OC) would be a line
OC with an arrow above would be a vector
Throughout this I wrote OC for both the line and the vector
P' is a point on the line (OC)
The vector OP' is equal to some number q multiplied by the vector OC
well it was defined to us such that a bold letter such as a, b, c ... z or for example AB with a arrowover it or a letter with an arrow over represents Vectors
Right that's why they use p', a, and b, in bold, to represent the vectors OP', OA, and OB
points are represented the same way graphs are made, for example A = (1, 2) which is 1 step x axis and 2 steps y axis
With curly braces?
No, ()
Ok yeah that's sensible
Idk? my teachers example
...
In the plane, points only have 2 coordinates, you just write two numbers in the parentheses
I know
But then again, my teacher doesn't speak eng or swedish properly so I can't tell what he says
Either way, i don't know how this helps me with my current question
How else P' could be written as
I guess it could be a representation of two 5D vectors and the vector that averages them
as a point on AP
To get from the origin to a point on AP, what can you do?
P' = qAP
No that doesn't work, AP doesn't go through the origin
How does that equal going through the origin?
You just multiply AP with q which is between 1 and 0
to get the length from A to P'
I guess you have a common misconception about vectors
Vectors are only a magnitude and a direction
They don't "start" anywhere
If you scale the vector AP, you just get the same direction and a different magnitude, but then if you use that to get a point, you have to start somewhere
By default you start at the origin
So the point P' corresponds to the vector OP'
The vector AP has no corresponding point in the picture
It would be somewhere above and to the left of the origin
OP + PP'
Yeah that gives you OP'
Like this question is too hard for me
He expects us to understand this after >1 week = 3 hours of lectures
This doesn't reflect the lectures at ALL
Welcome to university I guess
you're supposed to be familiar with vectors
Clearly you don't quite understand what they are
clearly
You are on the right track, the problem is that I asked for "a point on AP", not specifically P'
A point on AP is q(OA + OP)
No
OA + OP would give you a point on AC
Scaling that would give you a line through the origin and through that point
That's not the line AP
qAP
OP+PA is just OA
how the fuck is OP+PA OA?
The vectors?
Clearly we aren't talking about lengths, right?
The vector OP plus the vector PA equals the vector OA
I thought you knew how to add vectors
Why do i have to guess myself to the answer?
Like how am i supposed to know this
i haven't been taught
i can't be guessing
I still don't understand the question or how to solve it
I got too P and then follow PA
or i can go to P' and go left or right
or i can go to A
and follow AP
It means OP + PA
Surely there is a difference between going from P to A and following PA
Yes
where q dictates the pointn on PA
OP' = OP + qPA
Yes, and that's a second way to express OP'
Now, it's not the same q in both ways, so let's use r instead
OP' = qOC and OP' = OP + rPA
There can be only one value for q and for r
So we get a matrix equation?
You get a system of two equations with two unknowns
Two equations because it's in 2D, so you have two coordinates for everything
So i have to convert OP', OC, OP and PA to their respective coordinates ?
and then find q and r?
$OP' = qOC \
OP' = OP + rPA$
Merineth
Either that or deal with vectors directly but that might be harder
Yes, using the base {OA, OB}
Merineth
,rotate
That's all kinds of wrong
You are using 1/4, I assume because of the hint, but I told you multiple times that it is never explicitly stated that OP' = 1/4 OC
Then, you are equating 1/4, a number, to something that results in a vector
Then, the coordinates of the vector OP are not (0, 1/4)
$OP' = q(1,1) \
OP' = (0.\frac{1}{3}) + r(1,0)$
Merineth
This would be my best guess
Oh and the coordinates of PA are not (1,0)
Is it not? it's one step to the right 0 up?
No, that would be OA
So the coordinates for OA and PA are different?
They are different vectors, so yeah of course...
Well then you need to take an introductory course on vectors
OA = OP + PA
PA = OA - OP
fine
@keen void Has your question been resolved?
@keen void Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @keen void
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know what to apply here, i tried integration by parts but got stuck there
Got this
I figured it, apparently it needed the outcome in a different form
Gucci
.close
Closed by @azure zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im having some toruble with part c
so im trying to find the y component of F_31
heres my work so far
this is what the answer should be
im solving for F_31y
maybe im using the wrong r here actually
but im only using the direction of the y component, right?
<@&286206848099549185>
@open kiln Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
10.The area of a circle is 38.5 cm2
. Find the diameter of circle
what's the formula for the area of a circle?
i wonder
pie r^2
yep good. It's just pi not pie 🙂
but yeah it's A = (pi)r^2.
So you have the area, so you know what A equals
so you just need to solve for r
ya
i did it b y doing
38.5/22/7 =r^2
but the answer is coming wrong
I mean I cant solve any further
well you can, you can take the square root of both sides
to isolate r
$A = \pi r^2$
$\\frac{A}{\pi} = r^2$
$\ \pm \sqrt{\frac{A}{\pi}} = r$
i didn;t get it
MellowDramaLlama
what is this +_
plus/minus
when you square root a value you get both a postiive and a negative value
BUT
I like buts
we can throw away the negative value since we can't have a negative radius
ladys buts
ook
uhhh, congrats?
so we're left with $r = \sqrt{\frac{A}{\pi}}$. Plug in your A and you'll find your radius.
MellowDramaLlama
$\sqrt{\frac{5.5}{7}} = r$
JAAT
check your math again. I'm getting 12.25
then you need to square root that with a calculator
$\sqrt{\frac{38.5}/{22/7}} = r$
JAAT
with this? ur getting 12.25
$\frac{38.5}{\frac{22}{7}} = \frac{38.5 \times 7}{22} = \frac{269.5}{7} = 12.25$
MellowDramaLlama
but regardless a calculator wil help you tremendously here. Are you not allowed to use one?
hmh m
correct
but
then u gotta square it
and the answer is 7
,calc 2 * sqrt(12.25)
Result:
7
yep! 🙂
so once you square root it you get 3.5, and the diameter is 2 times the radius, so 3.5 * 2 = 7
ok
ok
ok
ok
got it
.close
Closed by @lost surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
what's up?
.Find the value of:
(3/8) ÷ (3/4)
Find the following multiplication:
(6/13) × (36/ ̶5)
Calculate –2
1
9
– 7.
Find the sum of ( ̶9/10) and (21/15).
help me with these once too
nah I could only do your problem, but someone else can step in. I gotta go get some dinner
best of luck!
Closed by @lost surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Stuck on the first hw question lol
How do I know whether it is negative half or -3?
Note that if x = -1/2 is a factor, then (2x+1)^3 must be a factor
now consider the leading coefficient
Closed by @frosty glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
oh yeah
just re write like
Ohhh
Let me see
(x^3y^6)^1/3
and then xy^2 ok perfect
@devout garden Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, how would i do this without calc?
i thought of assigning f(x) = 2^(-x/2) and then every other option is just
f(x/2), f(x/4), f(x/8), ...
not sure if that's the way to go
and i guess thus i can say something about horizontal stretches
yeah pretty much
but not sure if i'm being dumb
what's the final conclusion
after identifying that?
2^(-x) is positive and decreasing from 0 to 10 so it makes sense to say that a horizontal stretch would increase the area
oh yeah fair enough
and for the converse it would decrease the area
yep
Closed by @hallow crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
3 lines, y = 0, y = x^2, and y = -1/5x + 6/5, whats the area over the interval [0,1]
<@&286206848099549185>
idk
find which function is greater over the interval
then integrate its difference
bc the area between curves will be the integral of top function minus integral of bottom function
alr
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
wait mb i did do it
show
.close
Closed by @leaden nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to factorise h(x)
what is h(x)
alr
damn, nvm, I don't remember this stuff, sorry
I saw factorise and got excited
Lol
I miss HS, rip
gotta go back and study this eventually
I'm kinda confused on 2 equal roots
oh
That means multiplicity two right?
well derivatives are involved 😭 my math class teaches that next semester I only know some stuff
x^2 has root of multiplicity 2
at x =0
ok sorry i didn't know what you meant 🤩 i will leave
@frosty glacier Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frosty glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A=(x,√+3), (x,√(-3)
B= (√+2,y)(√-2,y)
I guess option D is correct
But given answer is B
ohh okay
okay in that case u can lowkey just graph both and just see how many times they intersect
4
I don't know it is given in the answer sheet
maybe somebody else can find where we are both mistaken......
But who?
elements in A are of the form (x, +/- sqrt(3))
Agree?
Similarly, elements in B are of the form (+/- sqrt(2), y)
if we want these to have a common intersection
we can freely choose x, and y
and count all the possibilities
Closed by @astral tangle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For part B, I’m assuming I’ll need the length of AD first to find out the area, but how to I rearrange the formula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2abcosC so I get b^2 as the subject and get 2abcosB instead of cosC?
$b^2 = a^2 + c^2 -2ac*cos(C)$
MoonCaik
You don't need the length of AD btw 
Hm but in this case I don’t have cosC or technically cosD in this context so how can I use it?
I don’t?
yeah
You're looking for area?
And You're given all three sides right?
This is Heron's formula
I don’t have AD
You could find the area of triangle ABD and use that it's part of ABC
I’ve never heard of it
wait no
You do need AD to find the area im p sure
no yo udon't wait
does the angle ADC is equal to 90 ° ?
area of full triangle - triangle ADB
You can find AD by using law of cosines
1/2absinC
Then use heron's formula to calculate area
why not 1/2 ab sin C on the big triangle?
no yo udon'ttt
yeah
But how do I find the area of ADB if I don’t have AD?
You can get AD with law of cosines and then use heron's formula!
Heron's formula is the one that uses semi perimeter
i don’t have sinC tho, how do I find that?
You dont know the angles in the triangle except for the 60 degree
sinC is sin(60)
You dont have a right angle where AD meets the base
Isn’t that sinB?
[it's worth noting that in "(1/2)ab * sin(C)", the "a", "b" and "C" are really placeholders]
1/2 ac sin(B) is an equivalent formula
nono
not really
wait acutally
yes?
that is so real i just realized that
this emoji is so rage
like if I wanted sinA and I had 1/2absinC I can get it down to 1/2bcsinA?
the discord italic thing ruined the asterisk
grrr
do \*
Put spaces or backslash the asterisks
I think kind of????
yep
there's 3 versions
[which are interchanging the roles of a, b and c (and their respective angles A, B and C)]
ooh okay
That’s good to know that I can change the formula when I need to
so for the area of ADB I got 12sin60
You can simplify that more 
12*sqrt(3)
wait
lmao
hold on
i don’t have my calculator with me I’ll get it
it usually does most of the work 
Is it 6*sqrt(3)
You probably should know the "special angle" values 
hehe why memorize when my calculator does it 
Closed by @full dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is det A
What does that tell you about the column space of A
The column space is a set
Ok we might get sidetracked down this road
But what I wanted to say is that a (square) matrix with a determinant of 0 means it is not full rank
So it is possible for some b’s to not be in the column space
In the case that A was non-singular (ie det A ≠ 0) then any b you picked would be in the column space
Yeah anyway, with part a you’ve shown that Ax=b has infinitely many solutions for x
Then yes it must be in the column space of A
And hence it is in span{u,v,w} since that is the column space of A
Why does part a have the last line saying a vector = a set
Wait why are there curly brackets
No it should say $\vec x\in\left{\begin{pmatrix}x\y\z\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}2\-1\0\end{pmatrix}+\alpha \begin{pmatrix}-1\1\1\end{pmatrix}, \alpha \in\mathbb{R}\right}$
Frosst
Mycobacterium
I think so, the first part just gives the reader an idea of what the structure of the elements look like
Sometimes you may even see
$\vec x\in\left{\begin{pmatrix}x\y\z\end{pmatrix}\in\mathbb R^3\middle|\begin{pmatrix}x\y\z\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}2\-1\0\end{pmatrix}+\alpha \begin{pmatrix}-1\1\1\end{pmatrix}, \alpha \in\mathbb{R}\right}$
Frosst
Not necessarily
You can put a lot of stuff on the right
$\vec x\in\left{\begin{pmatrix}2\-1\0\end{pmatrix}\cdot \alpha \begin{pmatrix}-1\1\1\end{pmatrix}, \alpha \in\mathbb{R}\right}$
Frosst
This becomes a scalar
But yoy might not catch it
You need double \\ for next line in a matrix
You’re missing it for the first x y z
And the last one
Mycobacterium
Has at least 1 solution yes
But has a solution => has at least 1 solution
So you aren’t wrong
Yes
The idea is that the span of the column vectors of a matrix is the column space of the matrix
Closed by @carmine quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help to make a sign line
i think its called that in english at least, not sure though
heres an example
on all my other tasks, when its f’(x) ive always found top and bottom points and used - - - if the growth is negative, and —— if its positive, but in this one its not doing it
i thought you were only supposed to take when it hits the x axis when it was f(x) and then have —— if its above y = 0 and - - - if its below y = 0
can someone help me explain where i got this wrong?
Fortegnskjema er snakk om den deriverte, endringen av funksjonen, ikke hvilke interval funksjonen har sine positive/negative verdier.
Men måten du gjorde på, å finne positive/negative verdier, er på riktig spor. Du skal bare bruke det til den deriverte, ikke selve funksjonen.
men kan du ikke lage et fortegnsskjema til en normal funksjon?
Svaret ditt ser fint ut. Stemmer det ikke med løsningsforslaget?
Var ikke det ditt svar?
nei
Har dårlig tid, men, du skal se når grafen går oppover (positiv, solid strek), og når den går nedover (negativ, stripete line).
Du får bare prøve deg med andre, må gå nå.
Closed by @void wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have these 3 matrices and i'm trying to determine if theyre linearly independent. my process is as normal, but i'm not sure if my logic is correct. when equating coefficients i find a contradiction and that's how i determine they're linearly independent. is this legit?
@dark turtle Has your question been resolved?
@dark turtle Has your question been resolved?
@dark turtle Has your question been resolved?
@dark turtle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dark turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So there's a block with
circumference length of the base is 52 cm.
The length and the height difference is 8 cm.
And the widsth minus the height is -2cm, what is the volume of the block?
idk how to solve this
Is the circumference longer than the height or is the opposite true?
No circumference is not longer than height
so the circumference of the base is shorter than the height by 8cm
is it a cylindrical block
and the width is the diameter right
if there is a drawing in the question it would help
My calcs dont match up
no its not cylinder
Noo its not
i would draw wait
its like this
So it is a rectangular block
And by circumference you mean perimeter
ok i solved it using simultaneous equation
r u there
@rigid tangle Has your question been resolved?
sorry i was doing other tasks
oh yeah its called rectangle
sorry
would you help me how
wait for a bit, im almost done
Hello @wraith hinge
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@rigid tangle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, dumb question but isn't this wrong?
if anything shouldn't it be +2 * all three
yea that sounds wrong
$|A\cup B \cup C|=|A|+|B|+|C|-|A\cap B|-|A\cap C|-|B\cap C|+|A\cap B\cap C|$
chmonkey #1 simp
This is PIE
oh okay so i'm not the only one

thanks-
honestly i got that formula i think

if i think only about A, B, and C
not sure if that's what they meant
at least i got close to it
the difference was this^

thanks btw-
@trail ingot
.close
Closed by @hallow crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@trail ingot (sorry for the ping)
but wait this works right?
so i guess definitionally they just consider different regions

in actual PIE, you'd have that the green represents green + orange
😭
am i dumb too 😭
i'm pretty dumb lately
it doesn't make sense to me either
i use the actual thing too
we should have 175 = 64 + 72 + 88 - exactlytwo + 8 by inclusion exclusion amirite

if you think of adding/subtracting these areas as adding/subtracting the circular areas,
you can intuitively consider 64 + 72 + 88 - 175 - 8 - 8 as getting you the green areas only
first, 64 + 72 + 88 ends up = outer areas + 2 * green areas + 3 * red areas
then - 175 removes one whole area to be = green area + 2 * red area
then - 8 - 8 removes the red area twice to be = green area
hi matt
wait okay yeah that makes sense
but what's wrong with the actual inclusion exclusion
that's because it counts the three way intersection too?
in the "exactly two"
whats wrong with the formula is that it absolutely sucks to use rather than this simple approach
I havent checked the formula yet but it should be correct
i see why it's wrong now
|A U B| = sum of first intersections - two way intersection
|A U B U C| = sum of one way intersections - two way intersections + three way intersects
and then so on
thats vague
you literally have a wikipedia article about it so that formula is correct, what are you asking for
i know it's correct
i'm curious why it didn't work
or rather what went wrong
in using that
it didnt work?
A intersect B etc includes the intersection of all 3
yes
bruh
wait
also since theyre only giving you the green areas and the red areas as separate, that means you need more than just the formula to solve this
its a system of equations
so this is fine actually, it's a little different than inclusion exclusion
wait but actually using the formula is more involved right
it's not just |A U B U C| - |A n B n C|
what would that accomplish
cuz u gotta get rid of the only A, only B, and only C
|A U B U C| - |A n B n C| = outer areas + green areas
that would leave everything there while removing the three way intersection
you then need to remove the outer areas
which is an approach that the color areas thing I mentioned does anyway
typing AB for A and B, A + B for A or B,
PIE: |A| + |B| + |C| - |AB| - |AC| - |BC| + |ABC| = |A + B + C|
youre told the value of |A|, |B|, |C|, |ABC|, |A + B + C|
you need to find the value of the green areas which ends up being: (|AB| - |ABC|) + (|AC| - |ABC|) + (|BC| - |ABC|)
|A| + |B| + |C| - |AB| - |AC| - |BC| + |ABC| = |A + B + C|
|A| + |B| + |C| + |ABC| = |A + B + C| + |AB| + |AC| + |BC|
|A| + |B| + |C| + |ABC| - |A + B + C| = |AB| + |AC| + |BC|
|A| + |B| + |C| - 2|ABC| - |A + B + C| = |AB| - |ABC| + |AC| - |ABC| + |BC| - |ABC|
|A| + |B| + |C| - |A + B + C| - 2|ABC| = (|AB| - |ABC|) + (|AC| - |ABC|) + (|BC| - |ABC|)
64 + 72 + 88 - 175 - 2(8) = green area
so its not a system of equations but its still involved
right right, i get it now
thanks matt-
np
Closed by @hallow crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Calculus 1, I’m very confused on how to set this up
after I can get the equations figured out I’m sure I could solve it, but idk how
I’m just saying the class I’m in for convenience of the tutors here
You need to find where the slope is equal to 0 as calculators are not allowed.
So, by using derivatives. but the other part is definitely solvable just by being not slow (unlike me)





