#help-36
1 messages · Page 139 of 1
Yeah
Omg yay at least I remember that
Let's gooo
some pretty tough problems for just learning the power rule tbh XD
I just had to do polynomials
Erm guys so does the 1/x just turn back to like the negative power
Okok
They didn't explain it in this context (probably) but it does generalize to reciprocals
It's a lot more annoying to prove, though
Would it’s be like x ^ -1
Yea
I will say, i do truely love math courses that give you problems that seem impossible with your knowledge but they are actually possible and you just have to think a little bit outside of the box
though they can be tough
Okay had to double DOUBLE make sure
It's because we don't normally think of reciprocals as powers right away
My course explained that it works for all powers, but only showed the positive integer proof (which is fine for that point)
Well i meant more so the problem and how to differentiate it
Math is about thinking outside the box until you learn a method
Then its about using the method you learned
thats why its so fun
(my friends have been calling me crazy for years)
Same frfr
You got it?
U guys r a little crazy for going thru w this I mean coming from someone who stuggles with math
Erm almost
I think
Idk it's the ideas that make it fun
Like when I actually understood how the derivative formulas worked and shit I felt like I became a sorcerer (aaand then felt like shit understanding nothing like 3 days later but that's the process lmfao)
I feel like a wizzard when i use calculus to find a vertex 
top 10 reasons for learning calculus byfar
Gives the quadratic formula a new meaning
Waittt a minute so uhm yk when u foil it do the two x^-1 cancel out and u get like x^1 ( just x) or am I going insane
Nope, exponents add on multiplication
Nt tho
I forgot
Whoops
Ughhhh if I don’t finish this by morning my maths teacher is gonna get me
derive faster goddammit!!! /j
Do it for me pretty pls 🙏🙏
nuh uh, the only way to learn is to do it yourself
Unfortunately against policy
😔
I’ll try
Worst comes to worst you use wolfram, but wolfram doesn't tell you the steps
ive been legit offered up to 3 grand to do peoples math homework for a semester in classes im in
Ill always refuse because its for their own good to do it themselves, because if they dont do it themselves they will face more issues down the line :P
What the heck is wolfram
The goat of calculators
Not for derivatives and showing work tbh
I mean most of the calculators I use don't convert derivatives into the actual function, they just graph it (no hate desmos)
https://www.derivative-calculator.net/
This is the best calculator, that shows work. It uses the shortcuts, like power rule
Solve derivatives using this free online calculator. Step-by-step solution and graphs included!
Okay let's go through each step one by one
Im gonna have dreams about derivatives
$(x^{-1} + 1)^2$
Serphic
We split it into two
I get that part
$(x^{-1} + 1) \cdot (x^{-1}+1)$
Serphic
To remove any foil confusions, we distribute separately
$x^{-1}(x^{-1} + 1) + 1(x^{-1} + 1)$
Serphic
Can you distribute that out?
They're the same thint
Okay distributing out we geet
$x^{-2} + x^{-1} + x^{-1} + 1$
Serphic
-1 + -1 is the same as -1 - 1 which is -2
-1 + -1 = -2
Nothing cancels
Jezzo
$x^{-1} \cdot x^{-1} = x^{-1 -1} = x^{-1(1+1)}$
Okay
Serphic
Latex on mobile is not fun damn
Anyways simplifies out to
$x^{-2} + 2 \cdot x^{-1} + 1$
Serphic
Now apply the power rule (to avoid confusion, here it is for reference)
$\frac{d}{dx} x^n = n \cdot x^{n-1}$
Serphic

Congrats!
Yep
Forgot the x on the first term, and the negative on the second term
But yeah!
Lmfaooo
I might have possibly learnt something yay to me!
Took a while tho…
Slow learner for a reason
Any other problems?
For now… nope but i will be coming back eventually…
I always do tbh
Im a daily visitor
Haven’t seen the last of me yet
Tysm tho!!!
Np!
.close
Closed by @sharp cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question:
Lisa and Mark play a game where they each subtract either 1 or 2 from a random number. The person who creates zero is the winner. Mark always starts.
For example, starting with the number 5 Mark subtracts 2 giving the value of 3 to Lisa. Lisa subtracts 1 giving the value of 2 to Mark. Mark subtracts 2 and wins the game.
Prove by induction that if Mark starts with numbers of the form 3n+1 or 3n+2, where n is N, then it is always possible to win the game.
Closed by @zealous stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i keep plugging this
in my calc
and i get -6.14 instead
D:
how to use calculator on this discord plz help
i wanna see if its a mistake on my end or maybe the live lecture
you can use ,w <whatever you want to calculate>
ok
You shouldn't try to do terms with subscripts like this, wolfram will think it's D times X
You probably did the math and got -6.14 + Dx = 0 but never finished solving for Dx
@indigo plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @indigo plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone clarify the third image? This is evaluating limits at infinity
It's dividing both side but they multiply by 1/x which I get the concept but why is the denominator multiplied by x^2?
@lost narwhal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
<@&286206848099549185>
Because it's inside a square root that's why the 1/x turned into (1/x)^2
is that like a new rule. cause i never heard of it before
@lost narwhal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lost narwhal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for a i said lim x -> 5 fx is 3.5
and im confused on how to start on b
oh i see
lets just do both 112 and 113
so for 112 a ) the function approaches 8
cause it jumps to 8
112 b ) not continuous because of the jump from almost 3.5 to 8
113 a ) it suggests that the function approaches 3.5
113 b ) continuous, very close to f(4.999) and f(5.001)
<@&286206848099549185> sorry i know it hasnt been 15 mins but im in a rush (exam tmrw)
can someone check my answers above
No this is wrong.
Please keep in mind that we don't care about the value of the function at that point...
This is the most crucial point
From both negative and positive side, the function is approaching 3.5
So, just ignore the value of the function at x=5, and just consider what the limit should be...
It has to be 3.5.
yeah
please remember this...
not really
Because they said that assume the limit approaches to 3.5
Wait...
I might be wrong...
the revised one right
- a) 3.5 is answer
ok
I mean, if they are saying that consider the limit in part a, then as the limit is 3.5, the answer should be "continuous"
But if we just generally see a function like that, it's not continuous at 5.
i would want to say not continuous
cause i dont think they would give the same answers for 2 problems
alright
I have confirmed it from a friend.
Here is what he is saying:
112) a) 3.5
112) b) non continuous
113) a) 3.5
113) b) continous.
This is what we thought was right too.
And it makes sense too...
alright
is my reasoning okay
for 112 b
Yes
alright ty
pleasure
.close
Closed by @bleak edge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to find the basis of the the kernel of this LT
Veni, vidi, perii
so basically what I did was find when the image is 0 ( for a,b,c,d)
But isn't the kernel supposed to be a set of vectors

so I suppose I convert this to a transformation from R^2 to R^2 and then proceed?
@warm python Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @warm python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I want to find the basis of the kernel of this
I was thinking just
$\begin{bmatrix} 1&0 \ 0&-1 \end{bmatrix} ; \begin{bmatrix} 0&1\ 0&0 \end{bmatrix}; \begin{bmatrix} 0&0\ 1&0 \end{bmatrix}$
b,c \neq 0
thats your basis? one matrix?
yeah?
thats false
how? for this to map to 0, a+d=0
so a=-d
that's all
b and c are irrelvant
oh
that's why
Veni, vidi, perii
Is this better?
yes
Closed by @warm python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
HELLO
SOMEONE HELP ME?
i need help because i dont understand something im trying to get an homework done but i dont understand
,text [
\text{Tr}{\mathcal{H}}\left( \int{\mathcal{C}} \left( \text{Lie}{\infty} \left( \mathcal{M}{\alpha\beta} \right) \cdot \text{Exp}\left( \text{Path} \left( \frac{\sin(\theta)}{x} \right) \right) \cdot \frac{\text{Exp}\left( \int_{a}^{b} \text{EllipticE} \left( \frac{u}{v} \right) , du \right)}{\text{Hypergeometric}_2F_1 \left( a_1, a_2; b_1; \frac{c}{d} \right)} \right) , d\mathcal{C} \right)
]
V12
what problem are you facing?
i need help
<@&268886789983436800> Spamming in all channels + this
bro has no clue what he's typing
lmao
yes im expert
this
integral
bro
Brother cannot be a postgraduate bro 😭🙏🏿
yes
i need help iont understand
what does this mean
Sine of an angle
no not the sin thing
What is C???
the ----
thats division
a letter
sin (theta) divided by x
can we not troll in the help channels please
Ban🙂
Trolls in smay's presence is wild.
.close
Closed by @blissful condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to do this
x
You can factor that one out
x(-64x^2)
Pull it out/siphon it out
Yea
Wait
When
You factor
It's like dividing
So there's always something left
You cant get rid of something completely from dividing
Pull x out from itself
What's left behind
^2

would u squaree root
Because it's as if you did x/x
so would it be x(1-64x^2)
x(1-(x+8)(x-8))
(1-y)(1-y)
(x)(1-8x)(1+8x)
Closed by @white gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk how to do last one
@grim imp Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@grim imp Has your question been resolved?
@grim imp Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
That last one is just an asymptote thing. Essentially you’re limiting the graph.
I think your answer is -6,-7,-8,-9
Wait no
(-Inf,-3) should be the answer that satisfies the conditions present
Well also b= 2
Please elaborate
That would be the largest to for it to be continuous in the intervall
(-3,2]
The function is obviously continuous in the interval
But not im (-3,3]
OK
this is the answer right
i get it now i think
oh wait idk nvm
oh wait yes
i thought it was x, y for some reason
Yeah, its the intervall they used there
Though the question has a wierd design
(-3,b] and they want you to give all possible b values but if b i smaller than -3 then the intervall would look at lot different
You have the largest b values, for all possible b values just look at the one point at -5 that is isolated
Largest b is 2
And then list up all the b values that satisfy the property
Largest is 2
Because f is continuous on (-3,2] but not on (-3,3]
wat else do I put
do I put like
(1,2]
@teal lagoon
Nope you just put in the b values because they are asking you for any b such that f is cont in (-3,b] and not in (-3,b+1]
but if it was 1.1+1
it would go like
past 2
If you mean that b = 1,1 is a valid input then yes
So in general all numbers in (1,2] would satisfy the condition
do I put that as the answer
is the answer to the first part 2
wat Abt it
Yes
light work
Its a place where the function isnt continuous anymore
So you can figure out what you would have to put as b so the conditions are satisfied
umm i don't think that left side matters for this question
@grim imp Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @grim imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure I understand y=3x so m is 3 and both the x and y intercept are 0 so how can I have two ordered pairs to graph
Take random values for x
Nd find corresponding y
so I can use any value ?
Ofcourse
They have asked for slope intercept form
But it doesn't matter haha
so if I do y=3(1) would a second ordered pair be (0,3)
or sorry (3,0)
I did that and i got it wrong I have 3 trys
if x is equal to 3, is y = to 0?
yea
bro i think intercept is 0 and slope is (m) = 3
yeah it is
thats what I said earlier but since both y and x intercept are zero apperently I just pick a random number for x and use it
bro your two ploting point are - (0,0) or (1,3) try it
its both you need to use 2 ordered pairs
I just found out
basically since both intercepts are 0 we need to pick a random number which I will pick 1 and use it
so y=3(x)
y=3(1)
y=3
but we picked 1 for x so
1,3
yes,right
Thanks
In which standard do you study brother
well this is just college prereq bs but rn I am doing an associates in science with a focus in computer programming
I plan to do cs for a major
what about you
bro I'm in class 11 now , and preparing for JEe mains and advance
whats JEE mains ?
Joint entrance exam , it is for getting admission in NIT or IIIT like goverment collage
cool sounds fun
Bro seriously you don't know about iit's
nope
From where you belong brother
usa
Most people don't lol
The world doesn't revolve around IITs
lmao
is it a tech school or something
Yeah like the MIT but kinda bad
damn pretty prestigious
Yeah it has very tight selection rate
Though that's quite irrelevant to your question 😄
lol we were just talking about college and it came up
ik this is pretty elementry stuff for college but you be surprised how many things you forget in 5 months of not going to school
I'm aware
lmao I feel like I never went to school but I'm getting back into it again
Yeah, should have kept in touch for those 5 months
for sure but the professor understands that people forget over summer and started pretty simply next summer I'm not making the same mistake espically since I'm going into calc 
good talking though
.close
Closed by @rare moat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I feel this is false

oops
no, I didn't say anything yet
Nothing, I know
you might be onto something though
hmm, consider a mapping from $\R^2 \to \R^2$
can't
wait
then V neq W
Veni, vidi, perii

Consider the mapping $(x,y) \to (x-y,0)$
Veni, vidi, perii
every image in $Ker(T) \notin Im(T)$
Veni, vidi, perii
this sentence doesn't parse for me 
ok, so consider the mapping (x,y) \to (x-y ,0)
(5,5) \in Ker(T)
but (5,5) \notin Im(T)
indeed
I was thinking something a little simpler haha, but this works
consider T: R^2 \to R^2 given by T((x,y)) = (0, 0)
then ker(T) = R^2, and im(T) = {0}
I can prove it in words
not sure of how to formally express it.
Like if $Ker(T) = V \implies \forall v\in V T(v)= 0 , \implies Im(T)={0}$
oh
Veni, vidi, perii
ah, this is a special case of a very important theorem
okay
which statement is false?
this
why is it false?
this is good btw
I would just swap some symbols for some words
if W={0} \implies V={0}
I don't follow what you're trying to say here 
you claim that W = {0} forces V = {0}?
ah, I see
yo chartbit
can you review my proof 
I think it should be fairly checkable
cause it's short
Can't lie, haven't done much topology, but I'll try 

!noadvert /j
Please do not advertise your help channel or thread in other parts of the server. There are many people who need help, so advertising can quickly turn into spam.
I was just. kidding
how much geometry/topology do you know? (answer this after you're done checking)
I mean, here the mapping is onto W, so why does W have to be {0}
because the kernel is the domain -> everything in the domain maps to 0
like W={0,1} is also fine
1 just has no pre-image
oh wait
for a function every element in the range has to have a pre-image

so it has to be {0}
right
I think I'm royally confused
this is an implication
if ker(T) happens to be all of V, then W = {0}
the contrapositive would deal with your example
if W is not equal to {0}, then ker(T) isn't all of V
no, what I mean is
I can have a valid mapping from R^3 to R
where all elements map to 0
right
I think what Veni is saying is that the codomain needn't be the same as the image
yes, in that case they are correct
yes
for some reason, I forgot this was a true or false thing
and I just assumed it was true even though I knew better 
same ngl
"damn, I must've gotten real bad at LA since"
Back 
Now this is true
"barely"
I ended up going through some topology a while back, but never really covered it "properly", that said I am happy with what you've done personally 
This is as all elements map to 0, thus the entirety of V is the kernel
what about geometry
No 
I can check geometry to a point
You'll have to catch me first 
maybe eventually I'll do some algebraic geometry, but uhhh 
I am so geometry/topology pilled it's insane
I love manifolds
I am LA pilled too
what does $T=0$ mean
Veni, vidi, perii
I'm using axler for LA 1 :kannafire:
Hmm, this is a bit hard
Oh
Im(T) maps is the set of ouputs
ker(T) is the set of inputs that map to 0
Trying to find a counterexample from R to R
hmm
$x \in Im(T) \implies x \in ker(T)$
Veni, vidi, perii
Those are not words 
I think analysing teh contrapsotive may be more constructive here
so $Im(T) \not \subseteq ker(T) \implies T \neq 0$
Veni, vidi, perii
If x is in Im(T) , x is also in Ker(T)
What do the things in the image look like?
like inputs in T that map to 0
${Ax | x\in \R^n}$
Veni, vidi, perii
Well, in this case, it's Tx, and x being in V 
let me think
I want to arrive at the answer independetly
it's just that something about mathcord actually wants to make me think
hence i ask here
Hmm
Yup, I'm convinced this is true now
Now to prove it
Ok, I'm lost
can I have help
I'm unable to come up witha counterexample
Right, to take back to where we were, we said here that the image is everything of the form Tx, for x in V, and that the image is contained in the kernel
yes
If Tx is in the kernel of T, what does that mean?
x maps to 0
Not x itself, but Tx
(the V = W thing allows you to compose T with itself)
So if you have any x from V, what you know is that T(T(x)) is zero, T(x) is in the image of T, and subsequently the kernel of T, so must get sent to zero if you apply T again, right?
Veni, vidi, perii
remember that matrices can be considered as linear maps, which might give a bit of inspiration for a counterexample
So this is a false theorm?
The statement is false, yes, there is a map that isn't constantly zero, but whose image is contained in the kernel
hmm $(x,y) \to( x-y,0)$
Dimension of the space you're getting sent to needs to be the same, you need the image to be in R^2 in that case
Veni, vidi, perii
This isn't it, I feel
Something close to that would work though!
(in yours, (x - y, 0) gets sent to ( (x - y) - 0, 0) = (x - y, 0), which isn't zero)
Closed by @warm python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I turn this into a parametric equation for part A? Or am I going about this the wrong way?
@finite delta Has your question been resolved?
@finite delta Has your question been resolved?
@finite delta Has your question been resolved?
just apply the formula given!
same way as you would do in 3D
so, r(t)=t<-2,5,-6,-4>+<1,-2,4,5>?
yess
Ok, I was just overthinking what AB was then. I thought I had to do a dot product or something for some reason
I would try to find a value for t that makes y=0
exactly
and for b i would want to find t where z and y are 0?
yes, one t for which both y and z are = 0
Closed by @finite delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i test if the road can be twice differentiable?
verify the same conditions of f’ that you would do for f
I tried using the definition of derivative like i used to get a on f. But doing that on f' got me nowhere
Do you know how to do quotient rule?
Typically you wouldn't need to use the limit definition for derivative for something like this
You'd use the various shortcut formulas/techniques for each derivative
@vale wedge Has your question been resolved?
If I manage to derive both expressions twice, will that mean that it is twice differentiable,or must the function also be continuous at the same time?
Basically both f and f' need to line up
This is a piecewise function with 2 different intervals
The derivative of the function is the derivative of the appropriate function depending on what interval you're in
To be differentiable you need f' from the left to equal f' from the right at that point
So you can make a system of equations for continuous (lining up the pieces of f itself)
and the other equation would be for differentiable, "lining up f'"
So twice differentiable you'd do it again check limit from left and right and set equal
thanks so if this is how the system of equations after doing f'' on both of them then its not twice differentiable?
@vale wedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vale wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ratio of debt in the principal is 25%, ratio of debt in capital + ratio of principal in cap.= 1. (capital) How do I get ratio of debt in the capital
Closed by @vocal atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
limiting sum
geometric sum formula
the ratio if 5/6
since we know 5/6 is less than 1
we can import it into a limiting sum formula
you can derive it from geometric formula
for your geometric sum = a(1-r^n)/(1-r)
it is just general form of geometric sum
Let
[S = \sum_{i=0}^\infty r^i = 1 + r + r^2 + \dots]
where that sum converges. Then if we subtract (1) from (S), we get the same sum but without the first term
[S - 1 = r + r^2 + r^3 + \dots]
and if we multiply (S) by (r), we get... the same sum but without the first term
[r S = r + r^2 + r^3 + \dots]
so (S - 1 = r S). Solving for (S), we get (S = \frac{1}{1 - r}).
Invariance
so
[1 + r + r^2 + \dots = \frac{1}{1 - r}]
Invariance
another way to do it is also just by limits if you are familiar with it
when the sum converges (-1 < r < 1)
the general geometric series is conventionally written as
a + ar + ar^2 + ... + ar^k+... where k is a natural number
r is meant to represent the ratio
a represents the first term
the summation is
a(1-r^n)/(1-r) for S_(n)
if we want to take infinite sum, then evaluate it with limit of n approaching infinite
Since |r|<1, r^n will approach 0
your summation ends up being a/(1-r)
Closed by @verbal owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im supposed to find the domain of 4x(x-7)/5x^2-34x-48
so i set the bottom to equal zero but the factoring doesnt make sense
5x^2-34x-48
whats up with the factoring?
theres nothing that adds up to -34 but also equals -48 when you multiply
why do i do that
you do it all the time, you just seem to be used the having the x^2 coefficient be 1
say you have (ax+b)(cx+d)
when you expand that you get
(ac)x^2+(ad+bc)x+bd
ac*bd has factors ad and bc which sum to get the middle term
ac=A
bd=C
ad+bc=B
Ax^2+Bx+C
you can often find factors of AC that sum to B
might be a bit of a dodgy explanation ill admit
but the idea is there
could you explain in words, i cant understand math explanations
i think using words would be far more confusing in all honesty
its hard for me to keep track of all the letters its like greek to me
so when i do 5*-48 and get -240 is that my new equation
x^2-34x-240?
once you do that you need to find two factors of -240 that sum to -34
no
This algebra video tutorial shows you how to factor trinomials in the form ax2+bx+c when a, the leading coefficient, is not 1. It shows you how to use the ac method to factor such trinomials that contain 3 terms which involves factoring polynomials by grouping. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems for you to work on. E...
Closed by @fierce light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey gang, i need help with this here is my work too
i am struggling with theconcept of how to identify the axis of revolution so if anyone can help me with that with the process i'd be grateful! also with my computations with dy and dx, they don't match up? What am I doing wrong?
oh no that's in part b and c, i haven't showed that yet
second is not
is it the calc portion or algebra?
it's that you're only integrating from y=5 to y=14
but the region has a part below y=5 also
so you need to add the area of that part
(it's just a rectangle so it's easy to find the area)
hold i'm a bit confused on this one, i thought with the integral of y = 5 it covers that region ?
how could that integral cover it? the point (1,1) is in the region for example
also, your y integral is finding the area of the wrong part
you're finding the area inside the parabola, not outside it
okay i see that but i am having a hard time visualizing the "part" of y =5 hold on
Wait so like this instead? or
yea that's what your y integral is computing
wait so what kind of principle does this follow? is this a rule for vertical slices to find the area inside the parabola rather than outside?
i just want clarity with fundamentals cause i'm not really grasping the concept
well for each y, you want the distance from the parabola to the x=3 line, right?
yesyes
not the distance from the y axis to the parabola
so you should not be integrating sqrt(y-5)
you should be integrating 3 - sqrt(y-5)
OHHH i've been doing it wrong okay i see
i've been slicing it up to measure distance from the y axis LOL
and you'll still need to add the area of the rectangle below y=5
i.e. the rectangle enclosed by y=0, y=5, x=0, x=3
OHHH
because that is not counted in your integral
can you elaborate on this? as to why we do this?
wait hold on lemme redo it
because as you show in your figure, your integral is only finding the area of the part above y=5
so to subtract the area, can i do integral from 0 to 5 of (y-5)^1/2?
and subtract that result ?
why do you need to subtract something
your integral from 5 to 14 is only getting part of the region
so you need to add something to get the rest of the area
okay so we add 0 to 5 as an integral of (y-5)^1/2?
neg/pos sqrt of 8
what
if you have a horizontal line at say y=3
then you start at x=0 and end at x=3 right?
wait so that doesnt change the bounds of x?
i thought i'd have to sub the value of y to get new x bounds
what you have is the following
$$\int_0^5 (3 - 0),dy + \int_5^{14} (3 - \sqrt(y - 5)),dy$$
Bungo
the first integral is the area of the rectangular region below y=5
the second is the rest
if your y value is below 5, the parabola has nothing to do with the x bounds
the parabola doesn't even exist there
quick question so the y=3 wasn't given by the problem, so how did we infer to use 3-0 for 0 to 5?
ahh okay so just a hypothetical
if you're finding the area using y integrals, you have to break it up into two parts
the part below y = 5
(y = 3 is an example)
and the part above y=5
the reason you need two parts is that the parabola is the left boundary if y is above 5
but the y axis is the left boundary if y is below 5
whereas on the other hand, in your first integral (with respect to x), the lower boundary is always the x axis and the upper boundary is always the parabola, that's why you can find the area with only one integral
yeah that one was much easier
ah okay
so for integral of y=0 to y=5, the parabola doesn't really exist right
yep, you always have two choices when finding the area of a 2d region (either integrate with respect to x or with respect to y), and often one of the choices is easier
i still wanna learn how to do horizontal slices LOL
yea, the part below y=5 is just a rectangle, with height 5 and width 3, so area = 15
so just geometry, i thought it'd be more complicated 😂
well you can of course do it with an integral too but it'll work out the same
this is obviously going to be 15
thanks dude, you're a real one 👍 calc is not my strong suit so this helped a lot
yepp
nw, with a few more practice problems it will make more sense
.close
Closed by @warm patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do b
This what I have so far
This is correct
I mean you're pretty much done
@worldly spruce Can U Solve My One ......?
You can throw the minus in the denominator out in front of the fraction and maybe factor out 5 in the numerator
But it's correct
my answer sheet tho says 5/2(sqrt-3 + sqrt5)
@worldly spruce Please Solve This One ....Or Help Me To How To Solve This !!
im in 7th grade and i rly need my grades up
Yes, that's the same
If we first factor out 5
can anyone help??
$\frac{5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5}}{-2} = \frac{5 \times (\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{-2}$
USS-Enterprise
ohhhn
does anyone know 7th grade math???
You can move the minus to the top
And separate 5/2 as it's own fraction
Times sqrt(5) - sqrt(3)
$\frac{5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5}}{-2} = \frac{5 \times (\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{-2} = \frac{5 \times -(\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{2}$
USS-Enterprise
$\frac{5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5}}{-2} = \frac{5 \times (\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{-2} = \frac{5 \times -(\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{2} = \frac{5}{2} \times \frac{-(\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{2}$
USS-Enterprise
I moved it to the top
Before the brackets
It's just multiplying the numerator and denominator with (-1)
so -1/-1
If we have $\frac{5}{-2}$
then wouldnt the 5 be -1#
USS-Enterprise
USS-Enterprise
USS-Enterprise
Or, moving the minus up
$\frac{5 \times -(\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{2} = \frac{5}{2} \times \frac{-(\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{2}$
USS-Enterprise
We've got this
Then just distribute the minus
$\frac{5}{2} \times \frac{-(\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{2} = \frac{5}{2} \times \frac{-\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{5}}{2}$
USS-Enterprise
$\frac{5}{2} \times \frac{-\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{5}}{2} = \frac{5}{2} \times \frac{\sqrt{5} - \sqrt{3}}{2}$
USS-Enterprise
Actually
There's no division by 2 in the second fractions
When we take out 5/2
It's just the roots, no fraction
So
ye
$\frac{5}{2} \times \frac{-(\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{2} = \frac{5}{2} \times -(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{5})$
USS-Enterprise
$\frac{5}{2} \times -(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{5}) = \frac{5}{2} \times (-\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{5}) = \frac{5}{2} \times (\sqrt{5} - \sqrt{3})$
USS-Enterprise
There we go
wait a minute isnt -5 sqrt5 * -1 just +5 sqrt5
What do you mean
you put -5sqrt3 -5sqrt5 over 2 when you where removing the -
adn you * by -1/-1
wouldnt it be -5sqrt3 +5 sqrt5 over 2
Can you use brackets 😅
,rccw
but u put - instead no?
No I did in multiple steps
I did
I will just write the numerators
$5 \times \sqrt{5} - 3 \times \sqrt{3} = -(5 \times \sqrt{5} - 3 \times \sqrt{3})$
USS-Enterprise
sorry could you reshow everytjhing since getting rid of the minus 😭
im really lost lol
$\frac{5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5}}{-2}$
USS-Enterprise
wait
That's the third fraction here
ok
So
We multiply the top and bottom with (-1)
You wrote it as a separate fraction
I just put a minus
Like this:
$\frac{5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5}}{-2} = $\frac{(-1) \times (5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5})}{(-1) \times (-2)} = $\frac{ -(\times (5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5})}{2}$
USS-Enterprise
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Damn it
$\frac{(-1) \times (5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5})}{(-1) \times (-2)}$
i feel bad, its complicated this shi😭
USS-Enterprise
$\frac{ -(\times (5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5})}{2}$
USS-Enterprise
$\frac{5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5}}{-2} = \frac{(-1) \times (5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5})}{(-1) \times (-2)} = $\frac{ -(5 \times \sqrt{3} - 5 \times \sqrt{5})}{2}$
USS-Enterprise
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)






