#help-33
1 messages · Page 221 of 1
what do you mean by “remove”? Just replace it with AND and OR and XOR?
hi sorry for not mentioning this earlier i cannot do that in this one lmao i need to use xor
wait no
what i meant is that
okay forget what i said
i need to simplify this to a point where theres no negation sign anymore
.close
Closed by @lyric kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why this solution is giving number of subjects...i don't get it
His average score is sum of all scores divided by number of subjects
This average is increased by 5 due to the increases in certain individual subjects
So this increase is = the sum of additional scores in those subjects, divided by the total number of subjects
That's what the solution is explaining
Closed by @shy mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this implicit function theorem I dont get it
It means if you have some equation of multiple variables. Under certain conditions, there is a continouous/differntiable/C1 function that satisfies the equation in some open set.
can you give an down to earth simple example
x^2+y^2=1
there are two ways to consider y as a function of x
That give the upper and lower halfs the the circle
F(x,y,z) = 1
where F(x,y,z) = x^2 + y^2
ahh im so fucked dude
exam is this friday I am already cooked
im so fucked
what are the conditions we need to verify
I need to verify if all the derivatives are continous
like I need to verify if the partial derivative with respect to x is continous
i need to verify if the partial derivative with respect to y is continous for F
You need your function to be continoualy differentiable at the point where you apply the function. And that the derivative w.r.t. z is not zero
so a C1 function
You should trust your notes more then me on this
Yeah
?
arent you from israeli?
And?
And this is equivalent to the partial derivarives existing and being continuous
there is this guy from technion very famous
on youtube
talking about C1 class of functions
yeah if a function is C1 on an interval of the domain then the function is differentiable at a point in the interval of the domain and the derivative at that or those points is continous
there is nothing much more to say about it, just C1 class functions
Zensor!
don't know how you spell his name in english
He is amazing
dunno if he has content about implicit function theorem but
He should have
what where the conditions for in order for we to be able to apply the theorem
Calculus 2 - international
Course no. 104004
Dr. Aviv Censor
Technion - International school of engineering
Nice
how is that this circle equation is not a function
For every x there is are multiple y values
The point of theorem is that we can choose our "branches" and that they are nice enough
what is the definition of a function
one input cannot have 2 different outputs, vertical line test
We don't say its a function. Its a curve defined by the equation
yeah my bad
where did he got this equation from?
he solved for y?
Yep
But its rarely possible using elementary functions
Thats why the theorem exists, to tell you its possible
the issue is what are the conditions such that the implicit function theorem applies
C1 function and invertibale Jacobian
the fuck does that invertible jacobian stablishes
you know what the jacobian is? is like the rows are made out of the gradients of every component function
Agree with what?
that the varphi thingy is confusing
To me its not
can you explain
like I have an exercise we can work through if thats okay with you
about implicit theorem
Ok.
Sea $F(x,y,z) = y^2x - e^{yz^2} - 2xz$ \ a) Probar que $F(x,y,z) = 1 \iff z = \varphi(x,y)$ cerca de $(1,0,-1)$ \ b) $h(s,t) = \varphi(t-2s, t^2 + s^2 - 2)$ \ Encuentra el plano tangente al grafico de $h$ en $(-1,-1, h(-1,-1)$
Renato
I will need translation
we need to check if F is C1
Let F ... a)prove that .. .. iff ... in the neighborhood of (1,0,-1)
b)h(s,t) = . . . find the tangent plane to the graph of h at (-1.-1.h(-1,1
hopefully is readable
@\
@elfin cairn are you here?
Yes
Let $F(x,y,z) = y^2x - e^{yz^2} - 2xz$.
a) Prove that $F(x,y,z) = 1 \iff z = \varphi(x,y)$ near $(1,0,-1)$.
b) $h(s,t) = \varphi(t-2s, t^2 + s^2 - 2)$ \
Find the tangent plane to the graph of $h$ at $(-1,-1, h(-1,-1))$.
Renato
For a, the z=phi(x,y) imples F(x,y,z)=1 is easy
The other direction is an application of the implicit function theorem
care to elaborate?
like we need to check if F is C1 btw
thats the bare minimum to apply the implicit function theorem
there is also another condition that I already forgot
Non zero partial derivative
for the left direction we need to check if the partial derivative wrt z of F is non zero
Yep
something like that yea
idk why tho
something like, that z can be expressed as a function of x and y
we need to check if the partial derivative wrt z of F at the point (1,0,-1) is nonzero
And show its not zero at (1,0,-1)
By near they mean in a neighborhood. An open set containing (1,0,-1)
sure but why do they mention
how do I get to know if F is C1 in R3?
or do I just need to know if F is differentiable and the derivative is continous at a point and not in the entire domain
F is C1 iff all the partial derivatives exists and are continouous
so we need to compute all the partial derivatives
but C1 is in a interval not like in its entire domain
F is a vector field, like F : R3 -> R3
Yes
Only in a neighborhood of our point even
This theorem is local. We don't care what happens far away
,w partial derivative with respect to z of y^2x - e^(yz^2) - 2xz
Are they continuous?
how do I know
you mean continous in the neighborhood of a point or continous in all of their domainn
Continuous near (1,0,-1)
what needs to happen so we can guarantee continuity near (1,0,-1)
just notice that the partial derivative wrt x,y,z are sum of continous functions
polynomials, eulers, etc
sum of continous functions and composition of continous functions
Yep
So they are continuous. Good.
ye, this F surely is C1
its non zero
,w partial derivative with respect to z of y^2x - e^(yz^2) - 2xz at (1,0,-1)
The theorem tells you there is a differentiable function phi defined in a neighborhood of (-1,0) where
F(x,y,phi(x,y))=1
we neved used that F = 1
We did kind of use it just that its a constant so it doesn't change any of the derivatives
you mean we did F - 1 = 0
and took the partial divs
dude this theorem is weird
any idea what is going on?
Because its no use that there is one solution. We get a lot of solution that form a nice curve defined by phi.
how so
Wdym
like. lets go back a bit
lets rewind for a sec @elfin cairn
STEP 1, WHAT WAS IT, CHECK IF F IS C1
STEP 2, NOW WHAT?
we need that F(POINT) = 0
and that the PDV F(POINT) IS NOT ZERO
@elfin cairn
f(1,0,-1) needs to be equal to 0
Yeah
but ∂/∂z f(1,0,-1) ≠ 0
Yeah
ok, I just have z = phi(x,y) now
this definition you send is for like, scalar fields i think
do you have a link
In multivariable calculus, the implicit function theorem is a tool that allows relations to be converted to functions of several real variables. It does so by representing the relation as the graph of a function. There may not be a single function whose graph can represent the entire relation, but there may be such a function on a restriction of...
can you give me a step by step summary of what to do
how many conditions
3
C1
- F needs to be C1 in an interval of the domain
- F(x0,y0,z0) = 0 for the neighborhood of (x0,y0,z0)
- ∂F/∂(the variable such that = phi(x0,y0)) ≠ 0
@elfin cairn
you here?
Yes
In 2 its just that x0,y0,z0 is a solution
But you are right
After proving these 3 things holds you get the conclusion
One thing that is important for this question, is that if
F(x,y,z)=1 then z=phi(x,y)
This follows from the uniqueness of phi
The reason its true is because when fix x0,y0 then the function
g(z)=F(x0,y0,z) is monotone because dF/dz(x0,y0,z0) is not 0. Therefore its injective and we cannot have another solution with x=x0,y=y0 (in some neighborhood)
true
this is like ivt stuff
or something, that the function is monotonically increasing or decreasing
i mean this is confusing though
@buoyant jetty Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @buoyant jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
we still need to apply the theorem of the implicit function
or is it going to be used in b)?
@elfin cairn
like, so far we proved that if F = 1 then there exists a phi = (x0,y0) for the neighborhood of (1,0,-1)
are you here?
We already used it
For b, the implicit function theorem also tells us what is the derivative
Of phi
Yes
And it relies only on the values of the partial derivatives
So thats what you want to find
h is wrt phi dude
correct me if I am wrong but this is crazy
which is -1
wdym
One thing that is important for this question, is that if
F(x,y,z)=1 then z=phi(x,y)
Yes
dude but
And because this phi(1,0)=z=-1
,w y^2x-e^(yz^2)-2xz at (1,0,-1)
suppose z = -1
how to find the tangent plane thingy
P = (-1,-1,-1)
You need the partial derivatives of h at (-1,-1)
Ok
So the implicit function theorem tells you its derivative
Down

care to elaborate?
$$\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial x}(x,y) = -\frac{\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x, y, \varphi(x,y))}{\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}(x, y, \varphi(x,y))}$$ and $$\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial y}(x,y) = -\frac{\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x, y, \varphi(x,y))}{\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}(x, y, \varphi(x,y))}$$
ExpertEsquieESQUIE
@buoyant jetty Has your question been resolved?
but
@buoyant jetty Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you can type ".close" if you don't have a question
@still temple
Aaaand he’s offline
any greens that can clopen? 
ATP we're gonna have to @ the helpers
.close
Closed by @cunning fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @cunning fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
cleaning out pins 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
brother, I appreciate your courage to claim another one after the mod closed your previous channel 💀
.solved
Closed by @calm harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me proof this fourier series?
i got [-pi * (-1)^n]/n for bn
and for an = [(-1)^n - 1]/n^2
can you show the original question
This is the question 😭
you also need to show your work how you got this
Closed by @wary vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to find f(x)
@boreal rock Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@boreal rock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a typo on the question?
I got 2 c values but the question said that theres only 1 constant
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Or did i do smrh wrong
Prob 4
theres one more condition for both the cases
i think
let me check rq
Tyt
hmm nvm solutions are consistent with range of modulus
prolly this thn
yah the solution is valid
-1-sqrt(65)/2 is around -4.5
who square is obviously greater than 16
unless i am tripping
hmm thats right
I checked with maple and it gives the same answer too
yeah then its most likely a typo
Wait hold up
Why does maple give me -16 instead of 16 on the 2nd line
Wait nvm its the same
It just ×(-1) on the entire abs for some reason
Anyways thx a lot yall.
.close
Closed by @abstract snow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Which part did i do wrong
this is fundamentally not how the chain rule works
A better way to do this would be to write [ x^{\ln(x)} = \left(e^{\ln(x)}\right)^{\ln(x)} = e^{\ln^2(x)} ]
kheer257
What you are missing here is in $\frac{d x^u}{du}$ x,u are dependent so you need to write x in terms of u before using any rules
do you mean they're dependent?
yeah mb
ExpertEsquieESQUIE
Closed by @abstract snow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help for riemann hipepotesm
.close
Closed by @stark sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Hi, do you have a specific question?
ok was this too trigger happy
not at all
i needed help
aighty
it might even be warranted to call the mods if this continues
with what
riemann hipepotesm
dude at least spell hypothesis correctly
@stark sandal just reopen it and see what's inside his sleeves lol
✅
@dusty oar which part of it?
okay so this is the Riemann zeta function right
zeta and omega
sorry😭
there's no omega
lol
<@&268886789983436800> troll suspected
ok this is getting boring now
This is what I'm looking for
im not trolling
id have let it continue if it was at least funny
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Can you take a picture of your homework
catbit is speedy
.close
Closed by @glass silo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ggs
The first one I've managed to get so far 
that way you don't get a chance to spill your coffee

budget george dantzig
bro i wont spare you ever
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
is it to be done using synthetic geometry
<@&286206848099549185>
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
bro calm down
sorry
do you have a diagram?
yeah
send it here
yeah
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
👆👆
hmm
what can we do
AFE and ABC should be similar why in the diagram seems kinda weird
it is just flippe
It would take me a bit to do this, if any helper can help atm feel free to
atm ?
at the moment
oh
can u?
no
Do you know cyclic quadrilateral
yeah
so do you agree with me AFE and ABC are similar
Do you know BCEF cyclic?
yeah
Angle BFC is angle BEC
Thats not the only way
Alternate segment theorem
if BFC = BEC then how do we know that BFEC is cyclic
okay so
actually...
ok
Alternate Segment Theorem is also known as tangent-chord theorem. Explore "why" it is so, with concepts, proof, examples, questions, and solutions.
btw you don't have to use it
BFC and BEC are right triangle with the same hypotenuse
BTW @weak surge
yeah the circumcenter of both triangle is midpoint BC
and they have the same radius
Cool
and so did i
do u want to see it ?
oh
can u dm me that one variable solution
i want to see
Alexis_Fx
i will try to digest it
@weak surge if you interest
_______
i am viewing
nice emoji
tbh I didn't understand the original
why does it has 2 variable
anyway let get back to the problem we're doing
okay so do you agree that BFEC is cyclic
Closed by @verbal iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is question resolved?
yes, now do you need anything?
Ah ok no i don't need anything tyfa
Closed by @harsh scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
. @little drift you may have this channel
can you tell me factors of 25&55
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
!noans for helpees
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
nosols is for helpers
what have you tried?
do you know how to prime factorize a number?
if so, you may apply that directly here.
i know 5 and 1
1 is not a prime number. if you are asked to list factors, you are allowed to list 1 as a factor, but be wary when asked for prime factors.
either way, are you just looking for a list of factors of both numbers?
if you are, start with 25 first.
tell me i have one mit to sumbit
I can guide you there, but I can't feed you the answer, I'm afraid.
piz
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
hint: 1 * ? = 25
also, I implore you not to DM me.
5
ok
1 * 5 = 5, though.
you want 25, not 5.
(what do you recall about 1 times a number?)
idk
um.... I kind of gave away the relationship for 1 times a number here.
piz can you alllow lute to answer
it is this server's policy to not allow direct answers. if you wish, you could take it up with the moderators.
that's just a bot
either way, we are here to help you learn, not to freely give out answers, I'm afraid
@little drift Has your question been resolved?
,rccw
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Problem associated with topic: Heights and Distances.
,rccw
Thanks for the help, I was not able to rotate it
do you have a sketch of the problem?
,rccw will rotate the last picture in thread countercclockwise for you, ditto ,rcw rotates clockwise for you 
I'm on the last part of this problem
To find AD
Please forgive me because of my handwriting 💔
Can anyone help me or they are working with this?
find bd?
AD
I've found the first two answers
I need guidance for the third issue
and the first two answers are correct, so no need to start it freshly
You got it?
Try applying pythagoras to find the diagonals
What would that lead to?
yes can we attach images here when u are new
can anyone help me with a recurrence relation question 😔
!occupied, sorry. please use a channel like #help-49.
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Did not understand.
Did you get it anyways?
you can use length of AC and cosine of 60 to find length of EC
You have reversed my diagram, anyways let me check
,rccw
just find x and then apply trigno on ade?
my ans is coming 16 root 3 but im not sure
x is 8 x sqroot(3)
Sadly it's wrong, you can try again.
The fact is if you can somehow prove that Triangle ADE is a right angled triangle, everything is set
oh wait
Or triangle ADC
? the angles u wrote arent given?
Not all of them
Hn you can do that since angle aed is 90
How is Angle ADE 90 degrees
Aed
Oh I mean, I need angle DAE or angle ADE
not to prove that it's a right angled triangle, because it already is
I wonder how did the ones who were giving CBSE board exam 2023 solved it.
Big brains
Well its actually easy I have lost in touch with it so
Not all questions are really easy, because some problems consist of angles out of the regular Trigonometry table such as 15* , 43* , etc.
Such questions generally do not come in exams
Height 8 aaya tower ka ?
Ha
Distance between them is 8 root 3
Is the ans 21.16
just apply pyth
Nahi
See i subtracted your tower ka height and x hai and i applied pytha
then thst part will be 16
Ya
,rccw
Ya
Let's go, it's correct
Yayy
How did I miss this
Happens
Closed by @bold fjord
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the answer for 9 1/square root of 2x+1? i alr answered 8 its 4
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
uhh idk how to use that bot😅
you should use sqrt() to type roots.
like, not in TeXit but just plain text.
oh ok
,w diff sqrt(2x+1)
looks right
Closed by @compact dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm learning to decompose things, is it necessary for the Ax+B to be above the x^2 + 1? Or could it be above the x+1? I tried switching the Ax+B and the C to see if I could do it but I couldn't solve for A, B, or C in the same way. Not sure if that's because you have to always have the Ax+B over the higher order factor or just because of this question.
It has to be above x^2+1 to satisfy the degree
Oh okay, so do I always have to have a form of the decomposition up top that's exactly 1 degree less than that side's denominator?
You can do Ax+B/x²+1 + Cx+D/x+1
and get C=0
so there is no point in doing the extra work
yes
Closed by @tidal charm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what did i do wrong?
check for sign errors
say you multiply a whole expression by (-1)
make sure you do the distribution part right
$-2p^2+p-\frac{77}{32}=0$ looks fine; the line afterwards is not
Flip
bruh
i got an exam tomorrow man im so done
glhf!
Just rotated it*
so cross-referencing with the problem as stated now... you sure you meant to write 77/32?
also, the odds of interest are in getting two wins or two losses. what you've written on the left-hand side is the odds of getting a win and a loss, or a loss and a win (they're the same). it is salvageable in this position, but you need to adjust the number on the right
17/32
my writing is bad
ack you're right, you dash your sevens and I do too, that's my bad
so
so win^2 + loss^2 = 17/32
are you asking for confirmation?
in preparation for an exam, you should start generating your own thought process, and justify your own answers
yeah man
but is it correct what i thought or no
cuz im geniuenly like confused
instead, pretend I don't know, and explain why you think your model is correct
so like u pull twice
and thats the explanation for the ^2
pull?
no no, like, pretend you're the teacher, I'm a student, you're going through this example with me because I've never seen something like this before
what even is the problem statement? what parts matter?
ngl i feel like i should include the 40 some where
@gaunt lynx Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I really need help guys
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Dont know how to begin
@warm sandal Has your question been resolved?
Subbing ||x = e^t|| should work
well i should first ask what you have donw
because these are kinda essential problems you'll learn solving ordinary odes
okay how would you have begun
@warm sandal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand the implicit function theorem
I have a Elementary understanding of it though
there is a consecuence of the implicit function theorem that will be used like in b)
@buoyant jetty Has your question been resolved?
is something like there exists some z = phi(x,y) such that F(x,y,phi(x,y)) = 0 around the point (x0,y0,z0)
there is a bunch of conditions that have to happen before we can use it i think, like F being C1 and the derivative wrtz of F not being 0 at the point (x0,y0,z0)
we also need that F(x0,y0,z0)=1
all of them apply, is just that
the theorem itself is confusing
hello guys
I made a video
Proof that every positive real number has a square root
isnt it equivalent to proving square root is surjective
yes just skipping the case y=0
Closed by @buoyant jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me solve thios
do you know one of the factors for the numerator?
yea so you know the numerator can be factored as (t-3) times something
(times a quadratic)
would it be 9
no there's also a term involving t
t^2 + at + b is the form
can you find a and b?
one way is to just plug in a couple of values for t
or you could carry out the polynomial division (t^3 - 27) / (t - 3)
Closed by @deep ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Claim a channel
This is technically open, but I’m not sure you’ll receive great help
Here
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey so im trying to do this problem and i tried everything and my professor's substitution method but his didn't have decimals so he did everything cleanly, and i can't even get an answer to input cuz everything's not lining up. Does anybody have any idea what's wrong i spent the last idk 3 hrs on this problem w no avail and even chatgpt is crashing out over it and i can't buy the pro version cuz its too expensive ngl
@past relic Has your question been resolved?
You've assumed 3 unknown variables (I_1, I_2, and I_3); you'll need three equations to solve the problem.
Also why is I1 flowing from negative to positive, it just makes it more difficult IG
Just make I1 flow in the direction of loop (from positive to negative), and write I3 as I1 + I2
@past relic you still here?
He could've very well reduced the number of variables too.
Yeah exactly, I3 is just I1 and I2 together, also IG I1 should flow from positive to negative anyways
Can't really say without calculating
Yeah but current flows from positive to negative, he might still get an answer but it's better to not take a risk
Not always, the V_1 cell could be getting charged if current gets pushed through its positive terminal due to the V_2 cell.
Yeah but in basic circuit diagrams unless he's taken a loop for the entire circuit where it includes both the voltage differences, that shouldn't matter much
sorry was busy w smthn but uhm i mean my teacher said that we could orientate the loops however we want and it'd be like the same i think?
at least
That's not wrong, still it'd be easier if you fix it in one way, that'd prevent confusions
oh so ur saying i should orientate both clockwise?
or counterclockwise
and then i'll get my right answer?
Well TBH that's not very important, you might face issues with plus minus though if you're not careful
The main thing was that I3 is just a relation between I1 and I2
wdym you mean? i thought I2 and I3 was a relation to I1
Are you aware of Kirchoffs laws
yh the amount entering a junction is the same as the amount leaving a junction
Yes, so let's say I1 and I2 are both entering a node, then the currect flowing out would be I1 + I2
It's best to use nodal analysis here if you want to avoid variables (if you've learned it)
lemme show you so basically the red dot is the node, I3 goes into it, I2 goes into it, and I1 comes out
so its I3 + I2 = I1
its these 2
i did two circuit equations
one goes counterclockwise so you get the first
i mean clockwise
the second goes counterclockwise and you get second
Now try eliminating I_2 or I_3 from both the equations
You can write I_3 as (I_1 - I_2)
So what do you've now?
its hard to understand cuz my writing is basd but basically i2 = i1 - I3
and then you sub i1 - i3 into i2
then you need to like do the whole thing where you find common factors so you can cancel out I3 to get I1
but then i ran into the issue
you can't multiply by anything to get 0.70I3 to be the same as 3i3
so the problem's basiclaly impossible
$$21-0.70I_3-2.30I_1=0$$
$$10-3I_3-1.40I_1=0$$
Are these your equations?
Will
yeah that's right ye
this is the same way my professor solvwed a similar problem
but his problem was ez cuz
it was all whole numbers
he threw out decimals at us
he could easily cancel it out
It would be really nice if you could write both the equations in terms of I_3
wdym in terms of i3, how do i do this? like take out i3?
from both
Isolate I_3 to the LHS for each equation
Yes
Yep
There you go
there's still two variables 😭 do you think i should email my professor there's smthn wrong w the problem?
I thought you'd be using
These equations
Lol
HUH
what happen
why is it wrong
where
why
how
What's the sign convention that was taught by your professor?
When to take - and +
OH
ok so basically when you go from + to - its like - and when you go from - to + its + !
Huh
like i2 goes from + to - so its - I2?
i think
uhm idk acc
i forgot lemme check my notes again
ok yh + to - is -
and - to + is +
das what i did in dis example
now idk if im right but i think that's what my recitation dude said
and he was an applied mathematics major so i beleived him although he does fk up on concepts ngl
so im not entirely sure now
but i'd say
im around 90% sure
why do you need physics to be a doctor anywawy
Okay so, this is the sign convention which I personally follow:
For battery:
- If you leave the battery from the positive terminal while moving in the loop, take it as +V
- If you leave the battery from the negative terminal while moving in the loop, take it as -V
For resistor:
- If current is in the opposite direction to your loop, take it as +IR
- If current is in the same direction to your loop, take it as -IR
what does current being in opposite direction of loop mean? do you mean if we set it as clockwise and counterclockwise direction
Try to write the equations
wait
Using the convention
i wrotei t as negative
ngl i got the same thing as i got before
is it the same?
It's not
but both voltages come from + terminal so they positive, and I1 current goes opposite and and oh wait i see it that's supposed to be positive
wait
so does this mean
that we switch
all the signs
to positive instead
cuz their all opposite?
Do it with the convention in mind
so i did the first circuit clock wise and I3 goes opposite and i1 goes opposite so
they're +
Yep!
and the second circuit is counterclockwise and I2 goes right and i3 goes up
so their also positibe
life is all positive
no negatives
someone could turn that into a haiku
I_2 and the clockwise loop have the same direction, it should be negative


