#help-33
1 messages · Page 220 of 1
You got rid of 2 x’s so you should remove x^2 from numerator
Like if you multiplied the X’s before cancelling them out you’d end up with $\frac{2x^{2}}{x^{2}(x+2)(x-2)}$
BBMaths
i think i messed somthing up bv
bc
for me there wasent an extra x^2
The top line of this is correct
When you cancel out both X’s the numerator should lose 2 powers of x
why is there x^2
yeah im confused on what that too
you only need x to the 1st power
also guys im supposed to use conditions of existence
like its obligatory
whats that xD
i think we might have been doing everything wrong if we haven't used that guys 😭
No one knows what it is
hold on lemme see
if you can explain it better that wikipedia i might help
ye ye ik
Oh I see
Since for x=0 in the original question, we divided by x so we are dividing by 0, we have to exclude that, even though we don’t have that division by x anymore
like this isnt optional btw
so we gotta start over right
ohh
This works for every other x than 0
Because the only time we cancelled stuff out was right at the end
btw im confused about this passage
This is the answer
I've learned this 3 years ago by myself and my teacher taught this last year
In the top line of this you had 2 terms which were x, so I would combine them together to say x^2
ohhh
if you have questions just ask
Even though I said fully factored was the best, in actuality, we like to group up identical terms into x^2
This is why I said to factorise first because now the numerator is linear but you’d already started by that point
if there wasent a -2
would it be
+4
instead
like x^2+4 instead
If they were +2 instead of -2 the denominators would already be the same
if there wasent x-2
of
ohhh
yea
so there wouldn't be the exercise lol
$(x+2)^{2}$ does not equal $x^{2}+4$
BBMaths
root 22 is diabolical
yea
not root i meant
You can’t multiply together to get x^2+4
$(x+2)^{2}$ = $x^{2}+4x+4$
Roy
if im seeing that im closing the matchbook 
So this is impossible
i see
Well that’s a lie
Huh
But it’s kinda true
$(x+2)(x-2)=x^2-4$
BBMaths
i think so il need a bit of practice but i think this is enough for today
well okay
thanks you guys were right i should have done the first passage differently
its 9th grade math
In order to multiply to get x^2+4 you need to use complex numbers
complex number
can some mods pls mute this guy
s?
If you square something you will get a positive number right
she's not ready for 12th grade stuff
im really bad at math 😭
Just for fun :P
stopppp
im actually not
shes not ready
Okay alright
i am ready
let her live for 3 years at least
im not in 9th grade guys 
huh
im just really bad at math
Ima leave this here… $i^2=-1$
BBMaths
what grade then
well so i was born in 2007 but I'm an immigrant so when i arrived in the country im living in now
i didnt know the language
also i was 16 at the time
that would mean
they would have to put me
directly
into the grafe
grade*
that was already
well it takes a bit of time for ppl
bc i had to finish the Italian obligatory school first
before going to
the 3rd year
yeah im pretty weak at math
dosent help that my brain deletes my math knowledge during summer break
they are in the best school in hungary and the best class they could've gotten and took them 3 months
well the teacher must have explained badly or smth
Do you want to know about complex numbers? Might be a cool thing to know about 🤔
nope
it was totally understandable
you seem so eager to explain that yes i would like to even though I really dont like math 😭
i appreciate your enthusiasm go ahead
Sorry I really like them :P
no no go ahead
well you need some practice because you are in 11th grade i think so you should know this really well
il listen
dont
Basically when you square something the answer is positive
ill listen send me in dms
Italian school works differently
Basically i is a “number” which when squared gives -1
send me in dms if you want to talk
its preschool middle school highschool
i can give you some integrals to calculate
A complex number is like 5+3i and that’s basically it for knowing what a complex number is
im in year 3 of highschool
5 I think?
wait i?
not too much tho
is i like x
its like pi
It’s a special number that isn’t like the numbers you know
its like pi
Italian school is very strict with grades
the first time i got graded i got scared 
ohh
dont worry ill help
whats different
Unlike x it is known but represented with a letter
what do complex numbers have to do with this
its an another dimension
nothing bbmath just wanted to talk about it
right @queen sun ?
🥀
We were talking about multiplying to get x^2+4
like the dimension of time?
no
why
you know the number line
bc its long?
yeah
like from -infinity to infinity
Because unlike other numbers when squared it gives -1
It’s just defined that way
...-1,0,1...
ye
WAIT WHATTR
yea well thats the real dimension
WHATT
It’s like above the number line
the imaginary is the vertical dimension
they said
is there an anti vertical dimension
nope
wait i wanna know now
na we are in too deep now guts
but then you need to learn more things
guys
did you actually solve her original problem atleast
yea
ok good 💀
lol
so first you need to learn about coordinate systems
and then disappear into the night 
i is above the number line
oh i know that
no
its not "the" number line cause theres 2
oh
the magical line
so right now theres x and y
Imaginary numbers are on a imagery number line perpendicular to the number line you know, the real number line
now turn that into r and theta
wait who invented that though
and why
You can think of i not as a number but a symbol satisfiying i * i = -1. It turns out this is consistent with the regular real numbers if we extend them by adding i and keeping our "numbers" closed under addition and multiplication.
An imaginary number is the product of a real number and the imaginary unit i, which is defined by its property i2 = −1. The square of an imaginary number bi is −b2. For example, 5i is an imaginary number, and its square is −25. The number zero is considered to be both real and imaginary.
Originally coined in the 17th century by René Desca...
It solves the equation x^2+1=0
Because i^2=-1
so with the power of a magical i
oh i still remember the most beautiful math equation
i can rebel against
It’s like the square root of -1
@queen sun
x^2
the forbidden tool!
Do you know e and pi
e is around 2.7
(it isnt)
e=2.7182818284590… is a special number which is really important for lots of higher mathematics and accounting
it seems really random why
also why is pi important
if you differentiate e its still e
The number e is a mathematical constant approximately equal to 2.71828 that is the base of the natural logarithm and exponential function. It is sometimes called Euler's number, after the Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler, though this can invite confusion with Euler numbers, or with Euler's constant, a different constant typically denoted
...
Pi is the ratio between the circumference and diameter of a circle
It’s used in everything to do with circles even spheres
You can edit
what's a ratio
oh yea
Like division
sounds like something greek philosophers would dig
Roy
since they like circles so much
Circumference/diameter = pi
the most beautiful equation of all time
The number π ( ; spelled out as pi) is a mathematical constant, approximately equal to 3.14159, that is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. It appears in many formulae across mathematics and physics, and some of these formulae are commonly used for defining π, to avoid relying on the definition of the length of a curve.
The...
the 5 fundamental numbers and the basic operation alltogether in 1 equation
These numbers are all seemingly unrelated when you learn about them
they aren't even 3rd cousins 😭
maybe thats why i dont like math BC they never talk about stuff like this
but its so beutiful i couldnt not show them
they do at higher levels
you would learn this in university
i hate math and even my brain has been scratched
if you choose the math path
definitely not for me but its cool
Some university mathematics is very fun other bits not so much depends on your taste
Like game theory is about trying to win at games
ok now lets not bother her with these things its quarter passed 10
its the weekend
im not bothered
if you want we can do more of my math homework 
Okay UTC+2
ok well bbmaths you keep explaining
its 10:15 for me too
ik were in same timezone
I’m in BST UTC+1
im prob going to shower then maybe ill come back
@molten quiver if you want to talk or do the remaining homework i can help tomorrow
okay Ty
Do you want to know what e is
tbh i like watching play troughs more than playing
yes
If you still have homework tomorrow dm me
yes
I have a finance example of e do you want to use euros for it
Doesn’t really matter which currency really
euros is fine you can use lari too if you want
I only have euro/dollar/pound currency on keyboard
Imagine you have €1 and you want to put it in a bank for 1 year (365 days) and then get it back. There are 2 banks which gives loads of interest:
Bank 1: Every year you get 100% compound interest
Bank 2: Every day you get (100/365)% compound interest
Which bank do you put it in or does it matter
hmm
lemme see
i choose
bank 1
You will get €2
Bank 2 gives €2.71 though
dang
They look like they would give the same though right
i should have chosen bank 2
i even thought bank 2 would give less
If they gave less interest but more often then it eventually reaches a limit of 2.71828…=e
Bank 2 gives 1/365th the interest but for 365 more often
It gives more because you get interest in what’s already in there
always?
No bank would end up giving that much but they can’t get over that number
If I had a bank called Bank n which gives 1/n the interest but for n times a year as n goes to infinity the number approach’s e but no bank in particular would give e
But because currency rounds to 0.01€ it doesn’t matter
so with the power of rounding
they escape
e
was there ever a time
I suppose if at each step the money gets rounded maybe you could get more than e
Banks don’t offer interest continuously though it’s just an example
$e=\lim_{n\to\infty}((1+\frac{1}{n})^{n})$
BBMaths
Limit
In our original example bank 2 was actually bank 365
who invented the infinity sign
Ah
The infinity symbol (∞) is a mathematical symbol representing the concept of infinity. This symbol is also called a lemniscate, after the lemniscate curves of a similar shape studied in algebraic geometry, or "lazy eight", in the terminology of livestock branding.
This symbol was first used mathematically by John Wallis in the 17th century, al...
John Wallis
The idea is much older
it must have pre dated that
ye but i meant the symbol itself
like its an Arabic 8
turned upside down
^
that last name scares me
Why?
there was this awful movie
where the main character was named wallice
and i hate it so much
bc it was really sad
Wallace and gromit?
and weirf
no
tusk
i didn't even watch it i only watched a
uhh idk what it's called
Dw it’s fine
but i use to watch "what could the main character
do to survive
i think its called hoe to beat or smth
basically it was this awful movie about the main character getting kidnapped
and made into a walletuce
walleruce
and then at the end
instead of killing him
or giving him reconstructive surgery
they put him in a zoo
Weird
yeah
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Make sure to close it
.close
Closed by @molten quiver
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Don’t start with hey either would’ve been a better thing for me to have said*
hi :) pls close ur other channel first before asking another q
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @delicate light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Would be nice if there was a don’t say hi command
That is an absurd suggestion icl
there is the website i guess https://nohello.net/en/
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not sure how to start this because of the rational numbers condition
I would've try x_1=a/b and x_2 = c/d
to start out with, do you expect W to be a subspace?
Maybe do a1/b1 and a2/b2
well if I remember rational numbers is a subset of real numbers
Well what is a vector subspace
One I've seen so far it has to satisfy three conditions
What are the three conditions
Zero vector has to be in subspace. If two vectors in subspace the addition of two vectors must also be in subspace and multiplying a scalar to a vector in subspace must also be in subspace
Good
so do you expect all three to be fulfilled, or if not, which one would you expect not to be fulfilled?
By expect do you mean making a guess like not doing anything yet?
well if zero counts as rational number then I think so?
(0,0)*
if you add a rational number and rational number then I would assume you get a rational number so long as denominator isn't zero?
Yup
And if the denominator is zero, it isn't rational in the first place
So it satisfies the first two
What about the third
It makes sense intuitively but not sure how to show it
Rationals being closed under addition is a property you should just be able to invoke
Anyway now on to the third one
Does the third property hold
you can justify it to yourself by the fact that you can combine them into a common denominator
I think it should
What field are we over
Can you spell out the third property for me
Subspace of ℝ² so I imagine ℝ
^^
That I need to multiply a scalar and a rational number and get a rational number
it depends what scalar is
It's the same as for the ambient field
The scalar is anything in the field
^
And your ambient field is ℝ², so the scalar is from ℝ
Doesn’t have to be from R does it technically?
So is this true
But we are saying it is
well if c =pi or something then you wouldn't get a rational number if you multiply it
Correct
Good
So is it a vector sub space (after this question)
So does it satisfy the third property
so since it satisfy all three conditions it is a subspace of R^2 I'm assuming
I mean yes, the given set is a vector space over ℚ but when taking vector subspace you stick to the same underlying field
But you just said it doesn't satisfy the third property
If the field the vector space is over is the rational numbers, then it is a vector space, as the scalar multiple would be a rational number, so rational times 2 rational numbers giving 2 rational numbers therefore it works
I had that on clipboard for like 3 mins lol
But how would I show steps can I just say suppose x_1=a/b and x_2=c/d where a,b,c,d are integers. And then do the arithmetic?
Just give a counter example
well b and d has to be not zero
Just consider a singular counterexample
Consider (1,1) and scalar multiply by π
Gives (π,π) which isn't in the set
Hence done
I'm pretty sure you can invoke that lmao
But fair
If a teacher is asking you to prove π is irrational they better give you a long long time
If you know a fair bit of calculus, Niven’s proof isn’t too hard to follow
you can assume most properties of real numbers in a linear algebra class since it's not really about those
Well I don't think I have to do that , this is introductory level linear algebra exercise
Yeah π is irrational, it's okay
Breaking News: Scientists discover pi is rational, the last digit of pi is 3, 1 digit in
But if it isn't a subspace of R^2 what does that look like or mean
It means it satisfies some properties but not others
a subspace of R^2 is either the origin, a line through the origin, or all of R^2. there are plenty of other sets in R^2 (geometric shapes, the quadrants, etc) which aren't subspaces
(i didn't wanna tell him that cuz it seems like it's part of the rest of the exercise)
that means that it is not a vector space in its own right using the definitions of addition and scalar multiplication inherited from R^2
In general R^n is it just like a point line plane or 3D space etc?
I feel like I should know this but idk why I forget over holidays
So what would this set W look like geometrically
It's ℝ^m for m less than n
You don't have to answer that for your assignment lol
Read the question properly
Actually since it’s null you wouldn’t see it
It says give a geometric description but at same time I'm curious what it would look like
it says if W is a subspace give a geometric description
if W is a subspace
Q^2 contains almost nothing from R^2 (0% of the points) but at the same time you are always infinitely close to any point in Q^2
This exercise was kind of confusing because it felt like I didn't even use a vector at all
You used it to show a counter example
Alright, it makes more sense but I don't think I'd be able to come up with a solution by myself because I didn't know the scalars I'm working with have to be real numbers
They should say you are working on a real vector space or something, if they don’t it’s probably the implied field
Or whatever is implied in the question
!done?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @dull sable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
R^2 is has "standard" operations of addition and scalar multiplication which you should use unless specified otherwise. part of that definition is that the scalars are real numbers
To be very fair, ℝ² is technically also a vector space over ℚ
But yeah, what cloud said
So in linear algebra should I always assume scalars are real numbers
Xavier 🌺
You assume $\mathbb{F}^n$ is a vector space over $\mathbb{F}$
can F be any set or has to be something specific
A field
F being a field, which is a set like R, or C, or Q which you can add, multiply, subtract and divide the way you expect to
Also reopen the channel if you wanna continue the discussion
Or it might randomly disappear
Last question. It's probably not necessary for this course but should I look into what this field object is just to know
for this course you will probably use R as your field 99% of the time and C the other 1% of the time, so it's not necessary to be super familiar with other examples of fields. but it's good to know that you can use other types of scalars and what properties scalars have to fulfill
There are weird fields like Z_73
I suppose
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
-3x^3 + 17x^2 - 28x + 12
How do I factor this
try guessing one of the roots using rational root theorem
then synthetic division leads to a quadratic
I used Photomath and it says I can write it as a difference
-3x^3 + 6x^2 + 11x^2 -22x - 6x + 12
And then I can just factor it
But I wanna know why we did that
because it knows 2 is a factor
based on trial and error
you cannot escape trial and error
Bruh
Whole reason I need to do this is cuz I need to find a point of discontinuity in my rational function
Very annoying
well you can avoid trial and error if you use this
Is that rational root theorem?
yeah if thats in the denom, you just gotta bite it
youve heard of the quadratic formula, this is the cubic formula
no its not part of any curriculum
Closed by @hexed silo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not too sure where to start here
I think I need to assign a length somewhere (perhaps a side of the triangle or the radius of the circle)
then find the length of segment ZG
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
It’s hard for me to understand it and I try to pay attention but I just feel like my mind is slow
!occupied, sorry
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
and then from here determine the n-gon that would fit in the circle with side length ZG
but not really sure where to start
like, what part would be best to assign a length to? and what length (I'm thinking 1)
and why?
(all you really need are the angles AOG, AOZ, AOC, AOF)
Well I treid but got a decimal for n
let me explain my work:
first, triangles angles add to 180
so each triangle angle is 60 cuz its equaliteral
thus each arc is 120deg
like arc AB and AC
then do the same with the reg polygon
sides is 5 so (5-2)*180 = total angles
divide that by 5 for 108 each
then double it
arcs there will be 216
so arc GB = 216
then if we go GB - AB = GA, 216-120=96
arc GA=96
arc GC = 120-96 since GA + GC = AC, AC = 120
GC = 24
since Z is midpoint, GZ=24/2 = 12
then solve $\frac{(x-2)*180}{x}=12$
UCYT5040
Ok hold on
this is where i got decimal
108 is for the internal angles of the pentagon
Right ok, but that's not GB
oh no
G is a vertex of the pentagon, B is a vertex of the triangle
Let me show you something though, you're kind of overthinking it
ok, sure
If you draw the lines OA, OB, and OC, you divide the circle in three equal parts, right?
yes
And the entire circle is 360º
So each part is 360º/3 = 120º
You can do the same for any regular polygon
then each angle would be 72 (360/5)
Yes
Yes
GOF = 72, sub 24 = GOC = 48
then divide by 2 because midpoint
GOZ = 24
I still get a decimal though?
$\frac{(x-2)\cdot 180}{x}=24$
UCYT5040
x approx= 2.307692
What is that equation supposed to represent?
prob better to say x=n
(n-2)*180 is sum of angles for n-gon
then divide by n is the value of each interior angle
ohhh true
24 is the wrong angle
wait so how do i do this then?
is it just
360/24?
Yes
ohh yeah that makes sense
like asking how many can fit within the circle
and its 15, which is correct according to answer key
If you really wanted to use interior angles you could check the isosceles triangle OZG
it would be 156deg
180 = 24 + 2x, so x = 156/2 = 78
Double it to get the interior angle of the polygon
well anyways i way overthought this whole thing lol, thank you so much for your help though! makes so much more sense now
.close
Closed by @leaden peak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m trying to figure out what it converges to. Do I find 4 terms and find the pattern?
what do the numerator and denominator approach individually?
a real number (i forgot) over infinity
do you know the general rule for limits in the form (some number)/infinity?
you forgor 💀

well we can consider what happens when you divide a normal number by a really huge number
anyway $\lim_{x \to \infty} \arctan(x) = \frac\pi2$
,calc 45/99999999999
OHHHHH
UR RIGHT
the larger the denominator over a smaller numerator, the closer u get to 0
so it converges to 0
for questions like these, try subsituting n for infinity as that's what the limit is approaching
yaya
Closed by @ebon lotus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
yeah
so
you can see that these 5 numbers, there is always one thats divisible by 5
and the only prime number that is divisible by 5 is 5
so one of the numbers must be 5
how
which step how
there is always one that's divisgble by 5
yeah
and all of them divided by 5 gives a different remainder thats why one must be divisible by 5
yes
but why does nothing else work
ye
and only 5 is divisible by 5 and prime
np
is there a notation for prime numbers
yea there is none but usually we use p
Closed by @weary dirge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@helper
which part
Do you know what the words in bold mean? (For step 1)
@iron ocean Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
7
hmm
i tried
but i coudnt reach to smth by which i could get answer
Show your work
It's okay
it's alright
i did by co-linear base sharing same vertex
What did you get
nothjing
Do you know how to transform ratios of areas to ratios of side lengths?
That doesn't work unless the triangles are similar no?
We should first work on showing similarity
but there will be no similiarity\
Not only that
Area of BEF to area of BFC is EF/FC
Ah right
ill try
Good
nah i didnt get it
height will not be common
Why?
Good
AE/EB = [AEF]/[FEB]
Yes
[AEF] = P
[AFD] = Q
can i cosider this
Wait we have the same server tag
Yes we just need P+Q
yeah
AE/EB = P/8
AD/DC = Q/4
hello ?
@weak surge sorry to tag
Yes?
is it correct
You know FEB area already
yeah
Yes
what should i do further
Plug the values in
i m not getting it
Can you find [AEF]?
EF/FC is [AEF]/[AFC] which is P/(Q+4)
And you know what EF/FC is already
Now do the same for the other side and you have 2 equations
Goood
You know the ratios already
yeah
Can you solve?
Mhm
man you didnt respond to my ping earlier this day?
i still couldnt comprehend why you said that
Apologies i kinda have to go
is it correct
@verbal iron Has your question been resolved?
!noping
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
Bro, don’t harass my alt
@verbal iron Has your question been resolved?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand the question
what is considered the "outer surface"
as in the base
or what
because if its just anything on the surface
the shortest distance would technically be 0
but that doesnt make sense
oh wait it says from p
mb
.solved
Closed by @tall pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1/4 * arctan(3/4) is not 0.94...
,w (1/4)*arctan(3/4)
cause of the domain restriction
$\frac{\pi}{4} \le x < \frac{\pi}{2}$
south
there is still more than 1 answer in this domain
no there isn't
really what they should have done is tan(4x) = 3/4
then the principal solution, x = 1/4 arctan(3/4), doesn't fall in domain
so the next solution is x = 1/4 arctan(3/4) + pi/4
Closed by @finite forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Comment on peut determiner le determinant d'une matrice de taille n?
I think that is it
can you pin it?
How can we determine the determinant of an n × n matrix?
yeah
ez merguez
ya une formule
attend deux secondes
anon
je suis autiste
je connais que pour taille 2
déso boss
sah demande à chat gpt
j ai demandé et j ai pas tout compris justement
ptet youtube alors
moe encore pire
@shell tulip Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @shell tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
are my teacher's units incorrect? from my understanding, you can't add m/s to m. what i feel it should be is v(t) = 2.00 (m/s) + 3.00 * t (m/s^2 * s) - 1.00 * t^2 (m/s^3 * s^2). am i stupid?
The unit of t is s
yes but did my teacher make a typo
to be able to add velocities together they have to be the same unit
Oh, right, should probably be /s² in the second term and /s³ in the third
The units are not that important really
Or something like that, I don't know the context
true, really just a typo. would be still cool to get it pointed out tho
but thank you guys for answering !!
!done?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @outer granite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
No bro
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
extremely loud incorrect buzzer 😭
show said calcs
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
46.2%=1.55%=0.0155. 834,000=4,250€. 34,000×0.0155=527€. 4,250+527=4,777€. 34,000−4,250=29,750€. 29,750×0.0155=460.13€
29,750 not correct
Do you have a photo
no
@civic echo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If there exists an injective linear map T from V to W, and W is finite-dimensional, does V have to be finite-dimensional?
I’d also like to know the answer to this
Feels like there might be a trick for V infinite dimensional
lol
Review this while your at it
specifically the second part starting with "Conversely, suppose..."
@vague jay Has your question been resolved?
T(V) is a subspace of W, so T(V) is finite-dimensional, and T is an isomorphism from V to T(V), so V is finite-dimensional
Conversely suppose should be on a new paragraph imo
there is also an isomorphism from the preimage of W to W, by injectivity. say there were n basis vectors spanning the preimage and V was infinite-dimensional. then an infinite number of (basis) vectors would not map to W, which means T isn't a linear transformation on V
I’m assuming you didn’t make it but it’s easier to follow if converse is not on the end of the first direction so that’s a tip when you’re writing proofs
sure but why wouldn't axler just specifcy this in the exercise definition
Thank you, I'm not good at formatting and learned latex recently
/help
bro how do I close this channel
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @vague jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there a way to completely remove the negation signs from this?