#help-33
1 messages · Page 214 of 1
so you may not always get only one solution
most of the time you will not only get one solution
ah wait
there are mistakes here
for example in the first inequality you should have 7x+4y=<168 instead of 7x+46=<168
same mistake in the second inequality of the first system and the first inequality of the second system
yeah i meant to put 4y
they are probably typos
yeah
np
other than that you are fine
if you are to find the vertices
then you need to solve the analogous systems of equations of these
not the systems of inequalities
wth is that
hollup
lemme fix the ti pod
typos
7x+4y<=168
14x+2y<=210
7x+4y<=168
14x+5y<=252
14x+2y<=210
14x+5y<=252
so you need to solve these systems of equations
instead of these systems of inequalities
they’re the same thing tho
oh wait
the equal signs
yeah i changed them when i solved it i forgot to type it
so basically what you did here was that you solved the systems of equations
not the systems of inequalities
which is the correct thing to do
ight bet
so i got the vertices correct right
wait but in the question it said write a system of linesr inequalities
i checked the solutions of the systems and yes they are correct
idk what the restrictions are but isnt this what you did
and then isnt there a follow-up question asking for the vertices ?
yeah
there aren’t anymore vertices right?
just those 3?
wouldn’t there be (24,0) (15,0) (18,0) (0,42) (0,50.4) and (0,105)?
bc that’s when they meet the x and y axis
that wasnt mentioned before
but ok if these are included too then yes
because you will have more than these systems here
i am not pretty sure too tbh
you better wait for someone to give you a sure answer for this
i am not sure if the one(s) who will respond to it will help or just tell you to not ping it and go

if you want wait for 15 mins and then ping
alr i’ll wait 15 mins
good luck
@hot cloud Has your question been resolved?
and they were never heard from again
This is indeed correct.
Should've written what you're supposed to maximize as well
oh yeah that was in a previous question
To maximize: 28x + 8y
the vertices are (8,28) (12,21) (13,14) (24,0) (15,0) (18,0) (0,42) (0,50.4) and (0,105)?
yep
is this right?
i lwk gave up after there were no helpers helping lol
Idts there'd be this many coordinates. Note that the inequality 14x + 2y ≤ 28 automatically implies the two other 7x + 4y ≤ 168 and 14x + 5y ≤ 252
So you're only required to check the inequalities x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, 14x + 2y ≤ 28, to maximize 28x + 8y
Check the graph
14x + 2y ≤ 28 or rather, 7x + y ≤ 14 clocks within the triangle (0,0), (2,0), (0, 14) which is well within the other two inequalities
Yes. But the triangle formed by 7x + y ≤ 14 is enclosed within the other triangles and so, satisfying this inequality alone is sufficient
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
?
Yes. Btw the profit function is Selling Price - Cost Price = (28x + 8y) - (14x + 5y) = (14x + 3y)
And yes, if you're evaluating on the boundary condition, i.e., 7x + y = 14, then you have
Profit = 14x + 3y =2(7x + y) + y = 28 + y, function of y
So you maximize y, i.e., y = 14 ✓ so (0, 14)
@hot cloud
@hot cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hot cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
What’s ur question
@hot cloud Has your question been resolved?
this is the system and the vertices r (0,0) (0,2) and (0,14) right
@hot cloud Has your question been resolved?
Yes
(0, 14) maximizes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find the domain and range of f(x)=x^2-x ?
Domain is the set of possible inputs, so to find the domain just look at what values of x "won't work" (usually get this means looking for square roots of negatives and divisions by 0)
Range are the possible values you can obtain, best way is to plot it.
If you can't plot it, just know that minimums and maximums occur at the following places:
- Stationary points
- Boundaries
So find all the stationary points and all the boundaries (yes infinity is a boundary)
sorry i dont really understand any of that TT
i understand domain and range but idk stationary points or boundaries
what do you understand by domain and range
its all possible x and y values of that function
no?
so what is the domain of the function
all real numbers?
im not sure
the range of a function is the domain of its inverse
thats one way you can find the range of a function
when i graph the parabola stops at around -0.25
you're not supposed to graph it since that will only give an approximation
well since you've drawn it now, can you see that there's a minimum point?
okay a graph will tell you the range
try and find that coordinate
but you can still find the minimum without
(0.5,-0.25)
i dont really understand how im supposed to find the domain and range without graphing
have you learnt completing the square
Vertex form? $(x-a)^2+b$
AkitoLite
@jagged gale does that look familiar to you
definitely not 3 years ago😭
?
you can find the minimum from that expression
Wait
If $y=x^2+bx+c$, then
$y=(x+\frac{b}{2})^2+c-(\frac{b}{2})^2$
man what😭
AkitoLite
oof I need to put glasses or something 
i have no clue whats going on TT
the eqn on the right is completing the square
It's a formula but I can show you the step process on how you get there
ah ok
yeah im really confused cause this is stuff i should have done 3 years ago if i didnt slack off TT
have you done differentiation? Since you said you did that 3 years ago🙏🏻
no clue
i never did anything in class so i just remember hearing random things
i need to find the domain and range of f(x)=-3x+2 and f(x)=-x^2-x+6
@jagged gale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Oh thank you
@fierce phoenix Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @severe owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i wanna know how to do it step by step like im not sure what they r doing
i get the first few parts
Which part do you not understand?
The 2I part?
basically yeah
So the bounds part? You can switch the bounds of the integral by dividing by -1 since cost is an even function
an odd function is bassically just f(-x)=f(x)
iI have to do it the substitution way
that’s what the question asked
yep i know that
but why do we do the I and 2I
because we have 2 expression that mean the same thing, so we are able to do that.
It is done because as you can see, when you put them into the same integrand, and same fraction, they cancel out.
Err bassically the name of the function we are integrating
ahh okay
I? It represents your original expression
and why do we multiply by 2?
You use the original integral, then add the modified one which is the one you obtained
also why do we need to modify it
so that you can add both the original and the new one together
because they cancel out 🤷🏻♂️
There's a reason the substitution is given because it is not so obvious at least imo
you can, just harder to do
idk sorry. But I can give you another example when you can use this
idk either 😭😭
for example if you want to integrate sinxcosx only using IBP, you can keep doing by parts until you reach your original equation
ibp?
Integration by parts
Is that the same?
It's not IBP but the same last step
Wait
Actually here's a better one
$\int e^xsinx = e^xsinx- \int e^xcosx$ \
Take the new integral aside, \int e^xcosx = e^xcosx - \int e^xsinx$
AkitoLite
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Notice how integrating e^xcosx gives the equation we are trying to solve
Therefore, take $\int e^xsinx = I$ \
$\int e^xsinx = e^xsinx - e^xcosx - \int e^xsinx$
AkitoLite
Then $I = e^xsinx - e^xcosx - I$ \
This gives $2I = e^x(sinx-cosx)$ \ \
ie $I = \frac{e^x(sinx-cosx)}{2}$
AkitoLite
@rotund temple Has your question been resolved?
ok tyty
Closed by @rotund temple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am unsure how to get the primite function to 5^(-x)
I initially did (5^(-x))/(ln(5)) + C but that was incorrect
it was supposed to be a "-" before
like this: -(5^(-x))/(ln(5)) + C
Is there any calls I can join to talk about math with people.
indeed
if it helps, you can do a u-sub with u=-x, du = -dx
if you know what u-sub is
@dark rampart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.reopen
Don't know how to proceed
i know the projection formula but
i reach that <t3,q> * 2/7 * t3 = 1+t
what do I do from here?
@floral swan Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(x^2 -8x+7):(x-7)
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
You can write exponents like x^2.
1💀
try factoring the numerator or long/synthetic division
it starts with (x^2
How?
photomath says x(x-1)* 7(1-x)/(x-7)
Do you know how to do long division?
but thats weird
not really
ok
its kind of like normal division
but each time you try to multiply the divisor with a term so that it eliminates the first term in the
dividend
do you know how to factorise polynomials?
Have you not learnt factoring?
Yeah honestly it would be best if you brush up on long division or factorisation before attempting the problem
i did
you just factorise it
factorizing is like “n!” right
no thats factorial
its where you express a polynomial as a product of two "simpler" polynomials
for example x^2 + 5x + 6
= x^2 + 2x + 3x + 6 = x(x+2) + 3(x+2) = (x+2)(x+3)
so the bigger polynomial x^2 + 5x + 6 can be expressed as the product of two linear polynomails (x+2)(x+3)
yeah got it but how do you know you should split 5x into 2x and 3x and not 4x and 1x
that i did on intuition
but there are some tricks
for example u have to split the middle term into two terms
vietas formula
such that their product is the product of the first and last term
imo this is not required for simple factorisation
that's bassically the principal
Like that's bassically what you're thinking when factorizing
i mean yeah
im in high school and not specialized in math
It’s kinda hard to understand this
or why it’s needed here
$x_1$ is the first root of the quadratic, and $x_2$ is the 2nd root. in other words, they are the answer to $x$ when $y=0$
AkitoLite
ok so to obtain the formula we gotta work backwards
let's start off with $(x-a)(x-b)$
AkitoLite
When expanding, we get $x^2-bx-ax+ab$
AkitoLite

this is like bringing guns to a fist fight
@still temple
remember this principle to factorise:
Can't use formulas without knowing how to prove them
u have to split the middle term into two terms such that their product is the product of the first and last term
i tried continuing from here
where did I mess up
Photomath is wrong
try this first
oh okay
did you know that mathematicians used to study calculus, derivatives and apply them for a long time without a proper definition for limits?
can someone explain by simply solving it?
ok ill walk you through
then if i dont understand i ask questions
thank you
I mean yeah but like it's not like they didn't even know ANYTHING about limits
hi
my bad
lol
thought it turned into an equation lol
it doesnt work
if u expand it
u get x^2 - 14x + 49
which is not the original equation
Id recommend watching the video "This Is the Calculus They Won't Teach You" by "A Well-Rested Dog". (Skip to 24:14)
from here?
ok
so we have x^2-7x-x+7
then u seperate the common factors
so from x^2 - 7x -x + 7
= x(x-7) - (x-7)
= (x-1)(x-7)
putting this back in the original question
we can cancel the x-7
so that we are left with x-1
which is our answer
id highly recommend you to learn polynomial division
So wait how did 7 turn into a -7?
took it out from -1x?
try to expand what i wrote
you will get back the original expression
-(x-7) = -x + 7
nonononon
in the original it’s +7 at the end
-7 but where is “ -1* “here?
its fine
so
u sure this is correct?
yes
i think im lost
can we get to this with smaller steps from the start?
if you don’t mind
yeah
x^2 - 7x - x + 7
= (x) . (x) + (x) . (-7) + (-1) . (x) + (-1) . (-7)
= (x)((x) + (-7)) + (-1)((x) + (-7))
= x(x-7) -(x-7)
= (x-7)(x-1)
the . is the multiplication symbol btw
(x^2-8x+7)
[: (x-7)👈🏻we put this part aside]
x^2-8x+7
x^2-7x-x+7 i understand til here
x(x-7)-1(x-7) then we get this and I don’t know why +7 turns into -7 without first doing the multiplication with -1 first and why x doesnt turn into -x on the right side
and i dont know why the x and 1 we took out disappears in the last step:
(x-1)(x-7)
sorry i didnt read this yet maybe it will clarify gimme a sec
On the right side (-1)*(x+(-7))=
(-x+(+7))
Oh you took out (X-7)?
at the end
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
(x2-8x+7) : (x-7)
yes, what do you want to do with this expression?
Task just asks to do the division
Alright
First you notice that 7 is a solution of x² - ix + 7
So the rest will be 0
I suggest you to study x² - 8x + 7 (find its roots)
then if C and 7 are roots, x² - 8x + 7 = (x-C)(x-7)
The solution directly follows
Unless you want to do euclidian division of polynomial, (which is not done in high school in my country)
Do you get it ?
i dont get this first step
7 is a solution?
It is
But if you are in high school, step by step you should \
- Find roots of $x^2 - 8x + 7 = a x^2 + bx + c$ \
- Write this polynomial as $a(x-x_1)(x-x_2)$ \
- Then look at the division $a(x-x_1)(x-x_2) : (x-7)$
Jy
And "magically" (because you are a non Maths major at high school), everything will perfectly simplify
i will revise polynoms then
i think i did but can’t remember clearly
then x = (-b ± sqrt(∆))/(2a) if ∆≥0
Whats the triangle?
the delta
looks like rocket science to me
ahhh
It is called the discriminant
Yea I remember something like that
$\Delta$
yea
Jy
i have to revise
I don't know what you study, but if you are willing to pursue something with a decent level of maths, second degree polynomial solving is a must
i was missing a ton of classes recently and couldnt revise with the rest of the class
This one seems hard
idk if it actually is
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple so $\frac{x^2-8x+7}{x-7}$?
;(

okay, take it like this; $\frac{x^2-7x-x+7}{x-7}=\frac{x^2-7x}{x-7}-\frac{x-7}{x-7}$
;(
now factor out the x in the first terms, and simplify the second and first once you have done that
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
i think bro disappeared
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For a collection $C$ of open sets of real numbers. There is a countable subcollection ${O_i}$ of $C$ such that $\cup {O\in C} O=\cup{i=1}^\infty {O_i}$.
somethingwrong
Im having trouble proving this, I know that the union is itself an open set and hence the union of a countable collection of disjoint open intervals
but im not sure whether this helps
i guess i could try showing that each disjoint open intervals is subsets of the union of some countable subcollection of C but not im not sure if this is true
@untold wyvern Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @untold wyvern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I want to draw those graphs in my calculator... with demos it works but i coudlnt figure it out how it works with my calculator
this is the one i am using
<@&286206848099549185>
cus if i define the funktion it doesnt do anything
how should i define them so i can draw them?
Maybe use the web version of Desmos?
Closed by @sharp quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys, does anybody know how to get knowledge specifically on compound renewal processes?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
I know it's something advanced and there isn't much people interested in stochastic processes, but I haven't found much information on this topic and it's something I need
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Well, it seems getting help here is hard
I don't know what that is, but I suggest you to check books online / at a library
I already did that
I looked at more than 30 books I think
I only got about renewal processes and compound Poison processes
So I decided to ask ChatGPT to see if it could bring some light about the extension of this topic
It gave a lot of things, I've found no information about
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Is this right <@&286206848099549185>. The question is what are the chances of a ball, 2 balls, and 3 balls landing all into one of the 6 cards
What particular thing you want know?
For this you need a particular compound or something then you can find it, in general "compound renewal process" for many things it is not specifying any particular thing @still temple
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fast bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to prove the Leibniz test works?
If $\left{a_{n}(x) \right}$ is a monotonically decreasing sequence of nonnegative reals s.t. $\lim_{n}a_{n}(x)=0$ uniformly in $x$, then $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n}a_{n}(x)$ converges uniformly.
babario
Let $S_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n} (-1)^{k}a_{k}(x)$. Then $n \ge m$ implies $|S_{n}(x)-S_{m}(x)| \le |a_{m}(x)|$ since $\left{a_{n}(x) \right}$ is monotonically decreasing and alternating terms cancel. Given $\varepsilon>0$, choose $M$ s.t. $m \ge M$ implies $\sup_{x}|a_{m}(x)|<\varepsilon$. Then $n \ge m \ge M$ implies $\sup_{x}|S_{n}(x)-S_{m}(x)|<\varepsilon$. Since $\varepsilon$ is arbitrary, $\left{S_{n}(x) \right}$ is uniformly Cauchy and uniformly convergent by uniform Cauchy criterion.
is my proof correct?
babario
@spring tree Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@maiden zealot
Come here
Nah this mf my stand
But yeah i don’t fw that shit
But Astro sure does
Im more with algebraic
And maybe a bit of linear algebra
LOL
These shit easy
You’re on more text than math
And I don’t like literature
God bless you we’re not in complex analysis
tiz just real 😭
lol
<@&286206848099549185>
@maiden zealot aint you helping my man ?
just to verify this proof i wrote to prove the alternating series test is correct
seems right to me
You gotta explain to me where do you situate yourself
?
You’re certainly not undergrad level anymore
I see
Yeah you fine asf
All that in khan ?
na
Didn’t you used other ressources ?
i have asked questions in math class that my teacher doesn't know the answer to because its so advanced (he has a masters in mathematics)
My prof has a doctorate but he’s shit in differential geometry
He didn’t liked it so he didn’t done them during his cursus
But he’s good with algebra
L'étude des propriétés analytiques des fonctions L de formes modulaires est un thème profond de la théorie des nombres. Jusqu'à présent, les propriétés ont essentiellement été établies dans le cas des formes de niveau premier ou sans facteur carré. L'objet de cette thèse est d'établir les bases de l'analyse dans le cas arithmétiquement opposé de...
What do you think of his thesis ?
(It’s in French but you can translate )
.close
Closed by @spring tree
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For recurrence relations/reduction formulae, how do you decide between whether you should go down to I_1 or I_0?
as you always go back two steps, you need a start value for the odd values and one for the even values
Sorry I don't really understand what you mean by that
What if the question doesn't say anything about odd or even values?
I have a pdf for a velocity distribution and I need to integrate it
(I can't send the question as I'm being assessed formally on it but it's an open book exam so I can ask for general help)
here you have I_n expressed in terms of I_(n-2)
so if you for example wanted to compute I_7, then you would need I_5, I_3 and I_1
Why?
but if you wanted to compute I_8 then you would need I_6, I_4, I_2 and I_0
Closed by @pallid terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not sure how to do this
IBP
Ig that's intuition and practice
- Are you able to integrate arctan -> Yes? Then go ahead and put bounds write answer
No? Then you must wish to differentiate arctan. Are there other functions you can integrate? Is "1" a function? Then integrate 1, differentiate arctan
@slim quartz Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @slim quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone who speaks German or knows this theorem explain it to me i think it is really phrased in a weird manner by my professor
Translate to English and can you be more specific what you don't understand
$$ \text{let } 1 \leq p \leq \infty , f_n \text{ p integrable and let } \tilde{f}_n \text{ be a cauchy sequence.} $$
$$\text{ then a subequence converges almost everywhere to a p integrable function f and } $$
$${\lVert \tilde{f}n - \tilde{f} \rVert}{L^{p}} \to 0 \text{ , in particular } L^{p}(\mu) \text{ is a banach space}$$
this is the translated version
@main idol
ابو حيدر
And which part of that is confusing to you
is f_n a function or a sequence of funtions
and \tilde{f}_n is an equivalence class of these functions i presume
Unclear from what you've provided so far
Could be a subsequence of f_n
Could be entirely different
we have defined it a few pages prior to be the equivalence class of some integrable function
so if i have a function f i define an equivalence class namely two functions are equivalent if
then f tilde is the equivalence class containg all functions equivalent to the representant f
I see so yes this is correct based on your notes
Do you know what L^p norm is
okay i will try it out and see if it makes sense
Then take the limit as n goes to inf
do you know what the applications of such a theorem are
Yes
@fossil tide Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fossil tide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anybody know how to solve these
i know how to do it when theres no square in the sinus or cosinus but with squares i dont know how
Bonk
2x - 1/3pi = 1/2pi ?
we sin periodically
ye
Find solutions to $\cos \left(2x - \frac{\pi}{3}\right) = 0$
Arya
That's Q1.
yes
what do i do with the sin square 2
Where?
here
$1-\sin^2 x = \cos^2 x$
Arya
Send the left sin²x to the right and you'll have
basically
ah ok
Understood?
yes but do you know the second one>?
Yes, and cos² x - 1 = -sin² x, so yeah
You get to, either cos x = 0, or sin x = 0, both satisfy the equation
Clearly that implies x = npi/2, right? cause every even multiples of pi/2, sin x = 0, and at every odd multiples, cos x = 0
is that so
1/2pi
uhh, general solution
uh idk
.
Also, this is not true
wat why?
The general solution for cos x = 0, is x = (2n + 1)pi/2
Because, cos pi/2 = cos 3pi/2 = cos 5pi/2 = cos 7pi/2 = 0
Cos every odd multiple of pi/2 = 0, so the soln to cos x = 0 is this
Similarly, sine of every integer multiple of pi is 0
bro my test tmrw might fk me :/
so sin x = 0, assumes the solution x = npi
well, atb
At least if this question comes, I hope you get this right
@twilit siren Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @twilit siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would this be considered a proper subspace of V?
W = {f in V | f(1) = 0}
closure under addition:
f, g in W.
(f+g)(1) = f(1) + g(1) = 0 in W
closure under scalar multiplication:
f in W, c in R
(cf)(1) = cf(1) = c * 0 = 0 in W
subbing [f(n) = 0, for all n in N] into the recurrence relation:
f(n) = 0 + 0 = 0. f in V, W
so W isnt empty?
yes
ty
the zero vector is the one you usually show is in a subspace
but like you hopefully noticed, its actually not that easy here to give a nonzero vector in W
like, its not hard. but not trivial
this is a nice example that this condition really shouldnt be forgotten
Closed by @frank mesa
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
,w rref {{2, -1,1,0,0},{1,0,0,-2,0}}
x1 -2x4 = 0
x2 - x3 - 4x4 = 0
x1 = 2x4
x2 = x3 + 4x4
(x1,x2,x3,x4)=(2x4, x3 + 4x4, x3 , x4)
x4(2,4,0,1) + x3(0,1,1,0)
T = <(2,4,0,1),(0,1,1,0)>
@buoyant jetty Has your question been resolved?
@buoyant jetty Has your question been resolved?
@buoyant jetty Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@buoyant jetty Has your question been resolved?
can I get some help
Maybe, by synthesis analysis ?
elaborate
I would try this. Compute T perp n H, then pick enough linearly independent vectors in H but not in the intersection to span S so you get the equality.
I tried finding the intersection between H and the orthogonal complement of T
basis for T:
x1 = 2x4
2(2x4)-x2+x3=0
4x4+x3 = x2
(x1,x2,x3,x4)=(2x4, 4x4 + x3, x3, x4)
x4(2,4,0,1)+x3(0,1,1,0)
T = <(2,4,0,1),(0,1,1,0)>
Orthogonal complement of T
v = (x1,x2,x3,x4)
- v . (2,4,0,1) = 0
2x1 + 4x2 + x4 = 0
x4 = -2x1 -4x2
x4 = -2x1 -4(-x3)
x4 = -2x1 + 4x3 - v . (0,1,1,0) = 0
x2 + x3 = 0
x2 = -x3
(x1,x2,x3,x4)=(x1,-x3,x3,-2x1+4x3)
x1(1,0,0,-2)+x3(0,-1,1,4)
Orthogonal complement of T = <(1,0,0,-2),(0,-1,1,4)>
Intersection of the orthogonal complement of T with H:
T : a(1,0,0,-2)+b(0,-1,1,4)
T : (a,0,0,-2a)+(0,-b,b,4b)
T : (a,-b,b,4b-2a)
H : x1 - 2x2 + 2x3 - x4 = 0
a -2(-b) + 2(b)-(4b-2a) = 0
a + 2b + 2b -4b+2a = 0
3a = 0
@buoyant jetty Has your question been resolved?
@buoyant jetty Has your question been resolved?
nope, look in the available channels category
sending a message there will claim that channel for you
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I solved c as 87, but according to the answer key it's incorrect
How I got 87:
I took the most left triangle 32 / 80 and solved the last angle as 68. Then I took the triangle 25 / 68 / C, and did 180 - 25 - 68 and got 87
wait oops
I just realized my mistake lol
^^ and got 43
.close
Closed by @regal kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im sooo confused
@uncut venture Has your question been resolved?
i ran out of space, but i'm gonna try to derive the area equation A and equate the derivative to 0 to find x
i have a really bad feeling about this solution, hold on
no wait
it checks out
10√2 by 10√2 is the max possible area's dimensions
and to get the volume you can just multiply that area by the log height (25)
giving you 200 sq. cm for the max area and 5000 cubic cm for the max volume
@uncut venture Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i guess this is true but like hmm why is there no need for cases?
if (a,b) is a point on Quadrant 1 then a 180 degree rotation ccw gets you to Q3 and then yeah the mapping would be (-a,-b)
Should there be?
Rotating 180° about a point is the same as "flipping" over that point
well it agrees yeah
The point of rotation becomes the midpoint between your original point and your new point
no no i mean they took (a,b) in Q1 right
and okay that gets mapped to Q3
what about Q2 -> Q4
It is exactly the same as Q1->Q3 except it's just a reflection
it works because sinx is an odd function ie f(-x)=-f(x)
i mean yeah it's exactly the same because (-a,b) -> (a ,-b)
but why did they not bother showing it
I think it's sort of self evident 🤷🏻♂️
because they supposed, (a, f(a)) on f(x) => (-a, -f(a)) on graph is intuitive for f(a) = -f(-a)
(a, b) -> (-a, -b), take a to be -a
oh yeah i'm pretty dumb
i thought you were mmmm7
😭 whattt i had to look at my name again to confirm
okay wait so
a geometric proof of a 180 degree counterclockwise
wouldn't need me to repeat it for Q2 -> Q4?
like okay if i take a point in Q1 as (a,b)
then i get a congruent right triangle in Q3 right?
the dimensions match and so we get that the point in Q3 is (-a,-b)
no but for geometric purposes, would i not fix it to Q1?
you shouldn't need to
because if it is anywhere then how do i get my congruent triangle construction
to prove stuffs
I did? 😭
i just used vertical angles
and well both are right triangles
so that too
for example, (a, b) and (-a, -b) lie on the same line bx = ay going through the origin
and then used the definition of a perpendicular bisector
and are equidistant from the origin
correct yeah
y = b/a x
thats enough to tell you theyre 180 degrees apart
I'm confused about what exactly you're confused about 😭
i worry about a = 0, but ok
😭 yeah okay but like this is for Q1 -> Q3 right
well
not really
my argument works for any point
except the origin but thats also not really of our concern
hmmm right what about
my congruent triangle approach
can't that be salvaged into anything meaningful?
for reference, this is what i was going for
well it works but now your argument is diagram dependent
and you're forced to think about whether the argument generalises to all quadrants
so like fixing (a,b) in Q1 then it is obvious that we the same point in Q3 is (-a,-b) but like we haven't showed this to be true in Q2 -> Q4 :sob so like i was confused
oh so you mean i'd do one for Q2 -> Q4 and then
see if they're the same thing?
well
maybe
but you shouldnt have to if you had made an argument that was general enough in the first place
😭
so these diagram dependent arguments are slightly flawed in that sense
true
okay yeah your argument works for all cases y = (b/a) x and to handle the a = 0 case we just reflect the point across the y axis
so i guess now it works for every a in R?
well, i didnt write it as y = (b/a)x
yeah you wrote it as by = ax
i wrote it as bx = ay, which works in all cases
except the origin, in which case the reflection is a bit degenerate anyway
i did not
okay so technically aren't you just testing for a = 0 manually?
if so okay i think yeah that's fair
not really
because isn't it technically written as y = (b/a) x
by = ax is always a valid equation of a line as long as (a, b) is not the origin
not just a different form
by = ax is strictly more general than y = (b/a)x
y = (b/a)x cannot represent vertical lines
causing confusion by being too general smh
ax + by + c = 0 is called standard form
right, blake is using that?
well
okay so i just learnt that standard form > (y = mx + c form)
im using the fact that (linear expression in x, y = linear expression in x, y) is always a line
😭 whattt
so all i did was write down some linear equation which both points satisfied
you should figure out how all these representations of lines are equivalent except for a few edge cases
idk what you meant by the things in parenthesis
by edge case i mean like how b/a can't represent a vertical line
yeah i guess it does make sense
like ax + by + c = dx + ey + f
no yeah this i understood from what blake said
i see so tldr
general form works for all cases
even with vertical lines
its just the basic principle that linear expressions give you lines
all linear equations are expressed in this form
so you form any linear expression that works
thinking "ax + by + c = 0" is too narrow
and i'm guessing it extends to planes and bla bla?
yes
so like linear expression is just $c + \qty(\sum_{i = 1}^n a_i x_i) = 0$
mmmm7
okay yeah i think hmm makes sense
sure why not
fine fine, thank you once again
😭 i feel like i'm not posing my question the right way
but for some reason
u understand my questions

Closed by @honest creek
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help here guys
@past flame Has your question been resolved?
nah
@past flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would you make this in NAND Gates
NOT(D1) AND D3
guys can anyone help me with algebric radicals?
you can make a not gate using a nand gate. then it's pretty straightforward
NAND(NAND(D1,D1), D3) then NAND That with itself
wolfram has one
i see
@willow salmon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @willow salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Struggling a bit to understand this. Ive gotten to fx = -6x + 6y and fy = -6y^2 + 6y +6x
I know your now supposed to make them = to 0 and find values for x and y
but Im not sure how to know if there would be 2 or 4 points
There would be 2
Solving the first equation for x (or y) and plugging into the second gets you two solutions for y (or x)
then, you know x=y
Ye Im stuck
idk what to do with 12y - 6y^2 = 0
can I just quadratic it? ye right
6y is a common factor
apply zero product theorem
Closed by @sudden steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, how do I write the function f(x) = 9xcos(9x) from [0,pi/2] as the limit definition of an integral?
This is what I tried
(the question assumes you're taking the right points so x*_i = x_i)
Not exactly sure where I'm going wrong...
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
whats the function?
(yes I'm aware I forgot the 9 in the cosine)
f(x) = 9xcos(9x) where x in [0, pi/2]
i think all thats missing is the 9 in the cos
the x_i=(pi/2*i/n)
Rifht
so filling that in gives what you have
ohhh
i see that you forgot a i^2
at the start
right?
wait, no
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
If I were to turn this into an integral, it'd be S a=0 b=pi/2, and then the function dx right?
yup
Closed by @toxic terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given function x^2 + y^2 = 9
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Sorry I was trying to take a photo
