#help-33
1 messages · Page 191 of 1
You need more
yes how
Derivative is the slope. You want to find the slope at 1
So you need to make a table with values around 1
can you give me an example to make it clear to me
You made a (small) table with the value of 1
yeah
Now, you use other values
what is the other values
Yeah isn't this just mean value theorem?
yes but in this question i should estimate it numerically
there is another i should use this theorem for
@lone heartthank u man u r the best ❤️
Yeah but the mean value theorem states that f'(c)=(f(b)-f(a))/b-a (for a given c between a and b)
And if you pick a,b such that they're close enough to 1 (one greater and one lower) it should be a good numerical estimation
i understand u but i prefer to solve it with a table
Yeah, dw, but I'd recommend having mean value theorem in mind usually
i will try it all. thank u buddy ❤️
@halcyon surge Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @halcyon surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a) What topic of math is this
b) How do you solve it
if it helps you can use a scientific calc
a) trigonemtric equations
b) use sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x) and factor cosine, use zero product theorem
is there an easy way to do that on a calculator
or do you have to memorise
yea you can use a graphical calculator
keeping some trig identities in mind is helpful
okok, how do you do this one?
its just these two questions ive never learnt b4
Closed by @halcyon scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im pretty sure you're supposed to simplify the first equation to 3^2x+3^-2x=34
not sure where im supposed to go from there
someone please help me with this
What's (3^x+3^-x)^2
sorry i had to do somehting
thanks though
i didnt realize it was this type of problem
.close
Closed by @hoary marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am working on software for rendering polyhedral graphs. this category of graphs happens to be undirected, unweighted, and dense.
i am trying to efficiently enumerate the faces / peripheral cycles of these graphs.
I've found and implemented a satisfying solution for enumerating chordless simple cycles (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.1051), but notably, this solution does not exclude cycles which partition the graph into disconnected subgraphs, such as the three cycles of length 4 which hug the meridians of an octahedron.
previously, i had been using eulers polyhedron formula to stop solving once 2 + E - V cycles had been found, but this is insufficient for edge cases in which these non-face cycles might be found before face cycles. i can provide more detail on that if desired.
am i missing something obvious? trying to research planar embedding makes my head spin,,,, id deeply appreciate any help 🙏
@daring wadi Has your question been resolved?
if this question is outside of the scope of channels like these just lmk. im new here so i'm not sure what kinds of questions are appropriate to ask
<@&286206848099549185>
@daring wadi Has your question been resolved?
What is the angle shown by a red line?
I believe it is theta but quite not sure.
<@&286206848099549185>
I also think it is theta, if the auxiliary line you drawed is perpendicular to the horizontal line.
@daring wadi Has your question been resolved?
@daring wadi Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @daring wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Bolzano-Weierstrass in my book is "A bounded sequence of real or complex numbers has a convergent subsequence"
.
so i started with there exists a subsequence (p_n_r) with p_n_r \in E s.t lim n->inf p_n_r -> L. If i could show p_n_r ≠ L i'd be done and i'd say L is a limit point but the only thing i know abt (p_n_r) is that its monotonic so my problem with saying p_n_r ≠ L is what if its something like (5,5,5,5,5,5,5,.....)
pls help 😭
A subsequence of what sequence?
oh right an interval is not a sequence idk why i said that
you are right in needing to choose a good sequence
you didn't use all the hypotheses given to you
about the set E
(like, there is a sequence in E that is not like (5,5,5,....), or even has that kind of behavior on its tail end)
does sth like this work
let p_n be an infinite squence: for all n\in N, p_n \in E
by bolzano weirstrass theorem there exists a monotonic subsequence p_n_r -> L
you need to guarantee that p_n is not constant
or like
that you can choose a p_n that isn't constant
and even more than that, you need to guarantee that none of the p_i is actually equal to L (this is the problem that you mentioned earlier, because we want the sequence to demonstrate that L is actually a limit point of our set E)
(actually you only need that infinitely many p_i are not equal to L, and then you can do some work to find a subsequence such that none of them are equal to L but have L as a limit)
so the question is now: how are we going to choose our "good" sequence p_n?
can we say sth like let p_n be an infinite sequence st no tail is constant
how can we say that there is such a sequence in E?
because its infinite?
yes, and if you want to make that part of it formal, you might use induction (you can just take each p_i to be different from all the previous ones at each step).
so now you have the p_n that is not eventually constant, and that's good.
yep okay, say that's p_n_r -> L as you wrote previously.
there is now only one potential problem with this sequence p_n_r.
it could be constant
we took care of that
what if p_n = 1,4,1,5,1,6,1,7,1,8,....
and p_n_r = 1,1,1,1,1,1....😭
if you choose your sequence right, then you won't run into this probem. you can actually choose p_n such that p_i \neq p_j if i \neq j
$p_i \neq p_j$ if $i \neq j$
differential smayded lie algebra
okay
this will come from the justification using the fact that E is infinite
okay
so that part is not a problem with the subsequence p_n_r. what we do care about though, is that some of the p_n_r might be equal to L, and we do not want that
so can we say p_n_r ≠ L as if it were then for some r>=N p_n_r =L so p_n_r+1 = L and so on and it gives a constant tail which is a contradiction?
well, there is no actual contradiction that we can derive (p_n_r+1 doesn't also have to be L, so your reason would not hold). we might actually have that one of the terms in our sequence is equal to L. what we want is to find a subsequence of p_n_r such that we skip over any that are equal to L. (the limit will still be L because subsequences of convergent sequences still have the same limit). how do we know that we can do this?
we can also recap or take a step back to look at the big picture at any point if you want or feel like you need me to go back
so sth like p_n_r_k = x \in R : x = p_n_r for all r\in N, x≠L
yes please a recap would be helpful😭
okay let me go wash my hands with warm water because I'm freezing oops and then I'll come back and say what we've done so far and what we want to do
oh lord take your time
okay so here is what we've done:
the first thing to do is to recognize that it suffices to show that there is some $L$ in $\mathbb R$ and a sequence $(p_n){n=1}^\infty$ such that $\lim{n\to \infty}p_n = L$
we used the fact that $E$ was infinite to get a sequence, say $(p_n)_{n=1}^\infty$ such that no two $p_i$ are the same.
we then used Bolzano-Weierstrauss to get a subsequence $q_r = p_{n_r}$ that had a limit $L$.
we are about to trim the sequence down further, which means we are about to take another subsequence $s_k = q_{r_k}$ such that no $s_k$ is equal to $L$. and then we will verify that $s_k$ demonstrates that $L$ is a limit point of $E$, and then we will be done.
differential smayded lie algebra
yesss sounds good
the key to the last bit is, only one of the $q_r$ could possibly be equal to $L$
differential smayded lie algebra
so let's say $q_{r^}$ is equal to $L$, which is the worst case, then we can define $r_k = k$ if $k < r^$, and $r_k = k+1$ if $k \geq r^*$.
differential smayded lie algebra
then $q_{r_k}$ is the sequence that skips over the problem term.
differential smayded lie algebra
yesss
the thing to fill in is why this part is true, and then explain why the new sequence is what exactly you want (or why it implies that L is a limit point)
and then you'll be done.
because no two terms are equal
the new sequence converges to L and no term is equal to L
yes this is the relevant part
and also that all the terms in the sequence are in E
np. real analysis can be a struggle sometimes lol
yeah it's really tough when you're in the weeds to actually be able to step back and put everything together, and that's something that you gain over time (and problems that you find miserable are pretty much the only way to get better at that unfortunately)
theres more 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
i will give them more thought and try my best to get them done
thank you for being so patient
❤️
.solved
Closed by @errant creek
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm back, I never quite figured this one out
Let $f: \mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be differentiable, and $f(x,y) = 0$ whenever $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ Show that there is atleast one point $(x_0, y_0)$ such that
$\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x_0, y_0) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x_0, y_0) = 0$
Bean Man
There are certainly points where df/dx is 0 and points where df/dy is zero by Rolle's theorem after restricting f to the closed unit disk, but I'm not sure I can find a point where both are zero
@unborn osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @unborn osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's 16274929 divided by 234
use a calculator
Closed by @dawn heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
This Is A Qustion Of India's Enginering Entrance Exam JEE Main from 10 April 2023 Shift 1, I searched the whole internet for this question but the same answer and method is used. First Of All They have can straight away canceled x and y in tangents eqns as if they are equal, Then They Have Directly Substituted the coordinates in the eqn of circle which gives distance btw the circumference and the point which wrong cause asked is Distance btw the two point of contacts on the curves. Please Help Me
The answer is 34
I think
Found on Google from studypool.com
This image clarifies your linear based question with y value, z value, and quetiont value. You should know by now under math regulations the multiplication based tables are useful for situations like linear, exponents, and rules. This page also explains how physics and science works as the years go by as space and earth have different times due to black holes, and how gravity will pull to make everything around you one singularity
Hope that helps
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @dawn heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
What?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am unsure how 3^x-2 gets me -10
Photo math showed me this but I am still unsure how x-2 turns into x+4
do you know this rule?
I do not
What would be equal to B and what would N and M be equal too
And what is this rule for?
if $a^x = a^y$ then x = y
Astar777
Astar777
here you first make the base same (3), 9 is 3^2
so it becomes $3^{2(x+4)}$
Astar777
then using the rule above, you do x-2 = 2(x+4)
Okay I am very dumb when it comes to math I really am just trying to pass my college algebra class so bear with me
How would I make 3^x-2 into -10
.
I am doing logarithmic equations and do not understand
you’re solving for x, not trying to transform 3^(x-2) into -10
The answer is -10 I just want to know how I get there
If you have 3^x=3^y, x=y
Look at what they said above for this
@chilly flower if you have 3^a = 3^7, what’s the only value of a that could make this true
7
A=5
Nacho Boi
whenever the bases are the same, the only possible way for the whole expression to be the same is if the exponents are the same
so when we have $3^{x-2} = 9^{x+4}$, we want to write this in a way such that they have the same base
Nacho Boi
because then we know that the exponents are equal
@chilly flower does everything I’ve said so far make sense?
It should but it doesn’t, I get what you are saying that they need to equal each other but I don’t get how 3^x-2 =9^x+4
so we’re being told that 3^x-2 = 9^x+4, it’s like how sometimes you’re told y=3x+4, it’s just your given information
In the equation I am only given 3^x-2 and somehow the answer I need is -10
I know the answer is -10
Nacho Boi
I don’t understand a thing about this but at this point if it comes up on the test I will just skip it
Thank you for your help
- is just testing your understanding on a few basic exponent rules
you’re not a moron, math can be difficult
Closed by @chilly flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find side length x
Amir
And angle z?
I have angle Y but not Z
Idk then sry lol
is y 28.8
No XYZ is 74 degrees
youll need someone else’s help on this i suck at this stuff 😭
yes
use it ?
@flint sleet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @flint sleet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
just send the question TOT
why do i get different answers on using Q = delU + delW and using Q = nCpdelT?
must be an error somewhere
ok gimme 5 mims, ill send my working
@random cosmos
i have been summoned
fr
my hand's broken, i cant press the pen any harder 💀
shouldn't have played football during exam days
oh damn, get well soon
anyways back to the question
yea
are u sure ur delU is correct?
i mean
ig-
lemme check
yea looks fine
okay then, im unable to see the sign convention properly, recheck that ig
the formula has 1-gamma in denominator
thats why u end up with negatives
@random cosmos r u indian
....
no
not like that
cuz this is sm
indian formulae
idk if its there in ur country
i am indian...
HOW DID U-

U SHUD KNOW THIS AAAH 😠
im in college...
oh ok
😹
answer the doubt
please
aaah
i cant spot any erorr
error
sorry
@random cosmos
i used the formula wrong 💀
its gamma-1 in denominator 💀
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @wary kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
DUH
😹😹😹
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
set the limit equal to L then take ln(L)
Allophane
Yea, i have already done that, but then???
$\ln(L) = \frac{1}{\ln(1+x)} \cdot \ln(\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{\ln(x+\sqrt{1+x^2})}{\ln(1+x)})$
knief
does that say ln^2?
Ye, you mean in the rhs denominator?
yea the image is blurry
Yea lol
ok and does it say - ln(1+x)
Yep
$\ln(L) = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{(\ln(\ln(x+\sqrt{1+x^2}) - \ln(\ln(1+x)))}{\ln(1+x)}$
is that what you had
no yours was 1-x
it says 1+x
knief
knief
Yep
Typo
this isn’t even true though
so we must’ve made the same mistake somehow or theirs is wrong
Maybe my mistake
I don't know where tho
Just want to know how did they got the rhs
nvm i got it
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
i’m curious how?
.reopen
.reopen
They use the important limit
Ye
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is strange because I thought the results obtained by using that important limit and directly taking the log should be the same
yea and it looked so similar too
i briefly thought of using that limit but it wasn’t in the usual form
so i kept banging my head against the wall doing it the way you did
But it's obvious that sometimes we have to use the logarithmic method, sometimes we have to use this important limit method, and sometimes I really can't distinguish when to use this and when to use that
These two methods should get the same result, but in this problem, they get different results. We can only get it through the method of the important limit, but the logarithmic method cannot get us thru it. This makes me feel confused
yea if i helped at all lol
.close
Closed by @small stream
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im learning about limits and i dont get the idea of LHL=RHL to check if its continous and where u do +h and -h and equate, i dont get it
No, why would it be 0??
i dont get it
Well, you can't do limits if you don't know how to read a graph
@severe wasp Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @severe wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone explain why the roots of x-4 is diffrent in this board? cause when i tried chatgpt it came up with diffrent answers
wdym
whats the qn
qn?
question that u are doing on the board
look at this
and the factor of x-4
factors
they are completely difftent
diffrent
nvm i found the answer
.closed
.close
Closed by @whole scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi there! How do I find the antiderivative of this rational function?
WDYM? Can you show me?
do you know u-substitution?
it's a nice method to evaluate this integral but you can do it without it
you can split the fraction
good, you can simplify it to get to what i wrote
Where's the 2t?
$\frac{2t}{\sqrt{t}} =\frac{2\sqrt{t}\cancel{\sqrt{t}}}{\cancel{\sqrt{t}}} = 2\sqrt{t}$
artemetra
How dod we get two square roots of t?
t = (sqrt(t))^2
awesome
now rewrite everything in terms of power of t
recall that sqrt(t)=||t^(1/2)||
do you know how to take it from here?
recall that antiderivative of the sum is the sum of the antiderivatives
(basically you can evaluate each separately and add them up after)
how would you find the antiderivative of $x^a$?
artemetra
for some a
x^a+1/a+1?
yep
Oh okay.
do that for each term and you are done
or like what are you asking
Yeah I thought bringing it up would make it a +/- to a constant.
Not make it as a coefficient.
the coefficient is not affected whatsoever
So it would be multiplied TO the number then?
If that makes any sense?
4 x sqrt(t)^-1/2?
yes, that's what being a coefficient means
Yeah I know how to do the process of finding the derivative through powers.
I just didn't know how to handle it as like a more complex rational function.
Ty.
.close
Closed by @topaz adder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @flint jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct?
Cause
x^2 - 7x + 6
x^2-7x+6=(x-=6)(x-3)
For the first one
x^3+3x-18
x^3 + 3x - 18 = (x+6)(x-3)
(x² - 7x + 6)(x² + 3x - 18) = (x - 6)(x - 1)(x + 6)(x - 3)
So C
yes
Closed by @obtuse plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would it be -4 0 1
yes
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @obtuse plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(2x +1) is a factor of w(x)
, whose graph is shown.
Is the multiplicity of (2x+1)
Odd
Cause odd is the only on e that would be odd
yes, you can see that cause the sign changes at x = -1/2
so that matches the shape of x^3, x^5, x^7 etc. locally at x = -1/2
Closed by @obtuse plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone check and tell me if this is correct
Rhs was too perfect I'm second guessing myself
@abstract hull Has your question been resolved?
Hi @abstract hull
The solution you have presented is correct
Great job
I just wanted to remind you that
Tan^-1( A) + cot^-1(A) = pi /2
Where A Is some real number
You got the same format here
(x^2+y^2)^1/2
Is some real number
Differentiation of constant is 0
Just another idea of solve your question
Though what you have done is absolutely fine
Hope this helps @abstract hull
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me make practice questions based of numbers 1 and 7 on this test about Sets, Counting, and Probability?
@rugged marten Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help.
He said it’s correct.
how would you express this
as a restricted enviroment
my guess
is
(x-delta, x+delta)
but is this correct?
@hallow pier Has your question been resolved?
@hallow pier Has your question been resolved?
No
.reopen
@hallow pier Has your question been resolved?
what do you mean by "restricted environment" ?
hmm so are you deleting zero? would you not use a union as they have it in their example?
well, i'm supossed to have a neightbourhood of p = x?
i don't know the full question, but yeah a deleted neighbourhood about p on the interval (a, b) would look like (a, p) U (p, b)
p in (a, b) ofc
well
i need to express this as a deleted neighbourhood if possible
is it possible tho?
a deleted neighbourhood needs something to be missing/deleted
as you have it, it's a neighbourhood about zero
it's not clear to me whether you're expected to delete zero.
maybe that's a reasonable expectation? idk we can ask someone with more topology education haha <@&286206848099549185>
lemme translate you the exericse
Determine the neighbourhoods characterized by the indicated inequalities. Express them using interval notation and, where possible, neighborhoods. Draw a graph for each case.
ok it seems you don't need to delete any values for this case then
you have an interval (-11, 11)
yeah
@full flume when can I express them using neighborhods?
maybe something might be lost in translation here
Express them using interval notation and, where possible, neighborhoods
i would say in words:
(-11, 11) is a neighbourhood about 0
idk if there's a better answer sorry
@hallow pier Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there an easier way to find the direction of a cross product without having to do any physical work with right hand rule
@molten ferry Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @molten ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did I draw the area correctly?
@jolly sigil Has your question been resolved?
@jolly sigil Has your question been resolved?
@jolly sigil Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @jolly sigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone please explain to me why there needs to be a Y(S)?
That's just what the laplace transform of a derivative is.
$$\mathcal{L}(f''(t)) = s^2 F(s) - sf(0) - f'(0)$$
Azyrashacorki
That's what the formula is. You can find it by using the Laplace transform definition and doing integration by parts
im also confused 
oh ok
In this case your initial conditions give you that y(0) = 1, whence the -s * 1 term
And y'(0) = 0, whence the - 0
Oh ok I will check the formula sheet
@sharp aurora Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
Could somebody please help me answer part c
Triangle inequality.
Ohhhhhhhhh
I kinda see it
But how do u get that into final answer
Actually ill give it a go and see if i can do it myself using triangle
Thanks for help
Yw!
.close
Closed by @vast seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
really confused on how to do this question
do you know about the identity sin²x + cos²x = 1?
yeah
just use that
3 4 5 triangle
yes
Closed by @half stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when finding the basis for KerT and RngT in a linear transformation, why do they have the same matrix? i was told to think about the nullspace and column space of a matrix but i am still lost. thank you!
what do you mean by same matrix?
in this example, when finding the basis the KerT and RngT the matrix you do RREF is the same
im not quite sure why that is and how it relates to nullspace and column space of a matrix
i understand that KerT is nullspace and RngT is column space but why do they yield in the same matrix?
the matrix is associated with the linear transformation by T(x) = Ax
could to explain that a bit more
why does column space and nullspace have the same matrix?
all linear transformations on R^n have an associated matrix, where applying the linear transformation is the same as multiplying by the matrix
so they come from the same matrix because they relate to the same linear transformation
in the case of vectors not in R^n, you could apply the same concepts by expressing them as coordinate vectors with respect to a basis
what does this have to do with nullspace and column space having the same matrix when finding a basis in a linear transformation?
because then the linear transformation has an associated matrix
could you explain that a bit more?
if you can express the vectors in a given space as coordinate vectors wrt a given basis, then we can treat them as vectors in R^n, and all linear transformations in R^n have an associated matrix, where applying the transformation T is the same as multiplying by the matrix A, i.e. T(x) = Ax
the image of the linear transformation is the same as the column space of the matrix (multiplying a matrix by a vector is the same as taking a linear combination of its columns), and by definition the null space of the matrix is the same as the kernel of the linear transformation
just to clarify, when finding the basis for KerT and RngT (nullspace and column space) they have the same matrix because we are essentially multiplying the matrix by A to apply the transformation?
if we have a vector x, then applying the transformation T to x is the same as multiplying by the matrix A, i.e. T(x) = Ax
it's a general theorem that all linear transformations on R^n have an associated matrix for which this is true
how would that apply to this example?
if we can find the matrix associated with the linear transformation with respect to given bases, then any relevant information about the linear transformation may be found from the matrix (because they are equivalent), including a basis for the image (column space) and kernel (null space)
so the matrix is only equivalent when the transformation is in R^n?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
any other vector space can be represented in R^n as coordinate vectors wrt a basis, and multiplying by the matrix is equivalent to performing the linear transformation on the coordinate vectors
so although it is more roundabout the matrix is equivalent to the transformation even for other vector spaces
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I am following a solution for a "difficult" inequality and I believe I spot an error. Here is the problem + solution:
Isn't the derivative of f(t) computed wrong ?
It should be $\frac{1}{16t}-\frac{1}{2(1+3t)\sqrt{1+3t}}$
nomemory
Do I need to get back to calculus class ?
It should be $\frac{1}{16t}-\frac{3}{2(1+3t)\sqrt{(1+3t)}}$
Katrro
So the solution is wrong ?
it seems like it since their derivative is wrong
Well, the derivative
Anyway, creative solution if not wrong...
Thanks @fringe iron , usually they don't mistakes like this, so it's suprising to see that, that's why I wanted to double check
.close
Closed by @desert gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove $c>1$ then $c^n > c$
\newline
Proof: $c >1 \implies c^n > \ldots > c> 1 \implies c^n >c$
Can you check if this is correct?
I’ve applied transitivity property repeatedly
Is there a more striaghtforward way, or is it this?
Dubs
This proof relies on the fact that $x^n > x$ for $n \in \mathbb{N} \backslash {0,1}$ and $x > 1$
Which is quite easy to prove on it's own, but should be noted regardless.
you just restated the problem with x instead of c
oh i'm dumb
but either way, there's something about c that means certain algebraic manipulations are allowed in the statement $c^n > c$
aeiou
you're essentially doing induction
which is fine
but you should write it out explicitly
assume c^k > c , then prove c^{k+1} >c ?
yes, and you also need a base case
yeah
does induction always require base case?.
I don’t completely see how
In the inductive step, we are using base case right
Unlike in recursion, I see the need of base case
Is it proved so to show it is atleast true for something to start with
Let your claim be f(n). So for example in this case your claim could be c^n > c
the inductive step (P(k) implies P(k+1)) is just an implication on arbitrary points. Without a first true statement P(start) you can't obtain any other true statements.
With this you're proving $f(k)\implies f(k+1)$
kheerii
but you still don't know if f(k) is true for any k
We are assuming f(k) is true right?
it could be the case that f(n) is not true for any n
in which case this doesn't tell us anything
you are proving that if f(k) were to be true then f(k+1) must be true
Without base case we are doing ex falso quodlibet?
ie from a flasehood anything follows
i'm not sure what that means
without a base case we're just proving that if something is true, then something else is true
it isn't!
Trying to see why induction works in general
you can use induction on any countably indexed set
in fact there's also a way you can induct on the reals (though I don't quite know how it works)
Induction is defined on any set with a defined successor function (and on R but that's above my level)
you can think of induction as a set of dominos
by proving f(k) implies f(k+1) you're setting up all the dominos
but you still need the base case to push over the first domino
That’s the analogy im trying to connect, please go ahead
I see, if the base case is true so is the base case + 1, so is base case + 2,…?
like that?
indeed
Wow
if I prove that f(1) is true, then I can use my induction step to say that f(2) is true, which I can use to say that f(3) is true, and so on
if I don't know f(1) is true I don't know anything at all
@wary yew Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone just tell me which technique or methodology do I need to know to solve this type of questions?
the first thing i'd say to do is to solve for y in each of these constraints
then graph
Hmm makes sense
Thanks:)
And use options right 🤔
Like graph everything and just get a rough idea
i forget the name of the theorem
but the optimal solution to linear programming problems comes at the vertices of the 2D region formed by the constraints
Closed by @obsidian mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
it's called the fundamental theorem of linear programming
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help on 14a? i have no idea on how to get to the answer i've been trying for 30 minutes. i know the height is 2 root 3
,rotate
Find the length and the height of rectangle
the length = the side of triangle - 2x
the height just use the ratio of 30-60-90 triangle
would it be tan(60)*x = root 3 x?
(root 3*x)(4-2x)
ohhhh thank you so much!
idk how i missed out
that
it’s so obvious
.close
Closed by @pallid elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thank you so much
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
From Khan academy:
y = Asin(Bx-C) + D
y = Acos(Bx-C) + D
From the web:
y = Asin[B(x-C)] + D
y = Acos[B(x-C)] + D
Which of these are correct?
not really a problem, I saw khanacademy is saying the formula should be this way and from web I find it's something else
so was confused which one to use
sinusoidal formulas
Both work, but I'd use the top pair because otherwise C changes with B
A is for amplitude
B to determine period
D for the midline
you mean, khanacademy's?
i've learnt these stuff like a year ago
now I'm tryna recall things from my notes, so a bit confused to two different equations
ah, I thought it was a differential equation problem
Closed by @dull beacon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that in a self-complementary graph (G) with n vertexes ,
n=4k or n=4k+1
And it n=4k+1 prove that there exists a vertex with the degree of (n-1)/2
@pulsar crescent Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@pulsar crescent Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi guyss !! quick question, 570 degrees' negative coterminal angle is -150 right?
and when u convert 325 degrees to radian measure, it's 65pi/36? that's all thank you
,calc 570 - 360
Result:
210
hii that one is my positive coterminal angle ^^
im unsure about my negative
ohhh
,calc 360 - 210
Result:
150
So 150 is correct
For positive you add 360
570deg = 210 deg = -150deg
thank you guyss ❤️
This one is correct too
,calc (325/360)*2
Result:
1.8055555555556
TYY!!
,calc 65/36
Result:
1.8055555555556
Yes
Please .close the channel if you are done using it @whole zealot
Closed by @whole zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that in a self-complementary graph (G) with n vertexes ,
n=4k or n=4k+1
And it n=4k+1 prove that there exists a vertex with the degree of (n-1)/2
Please don't repeatedly close and claim a new channel with the exact same question. This erases all previous progress made towards your problem and is confusing for helpers, making it more difficult to help you. Please be patient, even if your channel has not received much attention.
@pulsar crescent Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this its probably simple but im confused asf
So what do you not understand?
everything well like i do 3.14 * 8 squared * 9 and idk if thats all i need to do or if im doing it right
r is the radius not the diameter. And the radius is half of the diameter.
A composite figure is the figure of both the green and the blue object.
So they want the volume, what you do is calculate the volume of the green object and calculate the volume of the blue object. After calculating both you just add the volumes together
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, i can't understand how to find m, can someone please help me? Thanks a lot!!
Can you show the whole question?
I don't think this is enough to solve for m
ah yes i meant it, but i can’t clearly understand how to get that
If a is greater than b and b is greater than c
Than c is also greater than a
Does it make sense?
Yes, and why did we only choose m > 2? Like where did the equal go?
I couldn't figure out how to write greater then equal to
Sorry for that
In the images I have written it tho
Then it's an error with the answer key
m=2 is definitely possible
And should be included
yes I think that so
Please discuss this with your teacher
Anything else?
@smoky valve
If not please .close the channel
Actually, the whole question is “The domain of the function y = is a segment on the number line if and only if…”
Does this help with the final result i got?
What does "is a segment on the number line mean"
@smoky valve
I'm sorry, I’m using a translator so it may be not clear
Determine the range of values for m so that the function y =… is defined over its domain
Is this clearer?
Yeah
I still think m=2 is viable
The thing inside the root can be zero
So I believe I will stick with the answer we got
What do you think @smoky valve
Ah maybe it’s because of the translation
I've just discussed with my teacher
But anyways thanks a lot for your help
What did they say
Yeah
I wonder why
Y is defined at m=2
So it should be included in the domain
I don't get it
Give me your teachers contact
I will talk
Lol
Sure
I'm having an exam tomorrow 😦
Best of luck
lol same
You will do well
See ya too
.close
Closed by @smoky valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
okayy
Just assume z= x+iy