#help-27
1 messages ยท Page 444 of 1
<@&268886789983436800>
<@&268886789983436800>
wherever I go
I see him
must be the wind
From there there can help ?
wdym
hey so like dont post it again?
mb gng i thought im giving y'all proof ๐ฅ
what if he deleted it nd i got in trouble
1 min
alrr, time starts now ๐ฐ๏ธ
I jst need to prove hae is equal to gcf right
whts hae nd gcf
Before that I need to prove angle hae = angle gcf
A side
Yeah pls
Ehehe thanks
I believe you have to prove using vectors here.
From here i needed to make angle hae and gcf as equal
Name AO as some x
Then EB will also be x
True ?
@zealous bronze
How
We jst know its parallel
Nt equal r8ght ?
Parallelogram property
Opp sides are equal ?
Parallel and equal yeah bro
Ok
Now do same for all these
2x
How
I mean x +t ? Is right t ?
You'll be getting something like this
Analyse the picture once
Bf is z?
Ya did
Opp sides are equal here
Yeah
But still how to prove its parallel?
Yeah
Yeahhh
Equal and parallel
It is
We still don't even know that ef is a line or not
Before that we need to prove angle b is 180 degreee
I would say that by symmetry it would be perfect
How ? It will be like we r assuming it
Nt proving
I have a way to prove but a stuck at middle
Can u help me in that ?
Here u tried
To prove angle is equal to 180
Lemme try too give me 2 mins
I jst wanted to prove angle hae is equal to gcf
If those angles are equal
Then we will consider triangle hae and gcf by sas we can prove that it is congruent .
Then we can say he =gf by cpct
Ai says both angle are equal .
If u say last line and last 3rd line u can say Its equal ?
Hao
As adjacent angles sum up to 180 degree
2md line
Yes It is correct only ?
When u add 2nd and 3rd line u will get angle a right ?
AOB is triangle
Yes . How does this connect here ?
Sum of two angles is not equal to 180
In triangle
Sum of all three is 180
So BAO is not equal to 180 -AOB no cap on god
Hao in both lines ?
It is hao
I think u read I wrong
Yaaa
May be photo wasn't clear sorry
Bruh
Ok wait I'll check rest
Han then
Ohk I get where you're confused
That AOD +AOB not necessarily 180
?
Ok done
@zealous bronze
Yes it isn't
I didn't say taht it is 180
I never mentioned that
Have to use vectors
You know vectors?
I thought beacuse you're probably in 9th I'll use geometry only but
Not possibul I think not easily
Am in 12th
But with geometry we can prove ittt
How can we prove hae and gcf by angle equal
Then it's probably vectors but let's try geometry just for a teeny tiny more time
Just 2 mins please
Sure
From India?
If u see last 3 lines then it might be bit easy to understand
Yeah
Preparing for which competitive exam ?
Jee
But listen
Use mid point theroem
@zealous bronze
Now everything is sorted guys
Mid point ?
Didn't understand
Yes
Look look
I waned this
No need of extra mental pressure
I mean straight up prive
That hae is equal to gcf
Just not by angles
@zealous bronze ?
@zealous bronze Has your question been resolved?
2 min
Ok
For now forget abt wt ever u said
If this is the case . Then are both angle equal am asking .
Ai says yes but when it is explaining logic am nt able to understand
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
โ Original question: #help-27 message
If angle hae is 360 - ( aod + aob)
And gcf is aod + aob
Then is hae and gcf equal ?
<@&286206848099549185>
Yes pls ๐
Shall I t3xt u from another discord id then?
Ok
Yes
.
You can from this one or any u like
Once
Understand this perspective
I sent u friend request
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
@zealous bronze Has your question been resolved?
Err what
Is moving to dms and abandoning the help channel allowed
another reason behind this
And to prevent any misinformation to be spread
Or even worse shit that im not going to talk about
lol
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can some one help me ques 11.3 . When i try to derivative i got x^-1/2 then 0 ^ -1/2 is not exist
show your work?
it looks like you're trying to center it at 0, not 4 as it says to
Closed by @devout wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I use this
@vestal surge
Put in area now?
substitute and find area in terms of X
Now?
ye
good enough
but instead of finding common denominator
id say
split into 3 terms
Ok
$\text{Area} = 5x - \frac{3}{2}x^2 + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}x^2$
Velt
Got it
got this?
Yea
take x common
then you find common denominator for 3/2x^2 and sqrt(3)/4 x^2
$\text{Area} = x \cdot \left[ 5 - \left( \frac{6 - \sqrt{3}}{4} \right) x \right]$
Velt
do we have this
Yup
Idk tht
Leme google
Now I do
....
Gemini-ed
........
I think it might have been easier if he did some substitution earlier
Like
Instead of dealing with 3x and 2y
lemme latex what i thought, it seems sigma
๐ ๐ Tell me the way by AM GM pls
Some1
$\text{Area} = \frac{4}{6 - \sqrt{3}} \cdot \left[ \left( \frac{6 - \sqrt{3}}{4} \right) x \right] \cdot \left[ 5 - \left( \frac{6 - \sqrt{3}}{4} \right) x \right]$
Velt
perfectly balanced
beautiful am-gm
Its RHS?
and wrote 1 as $= \frac{4}{6 - \sqrt{3}} \cdot \left( \frac{6 - \sqrt{3}}{4} \right)$
Velt
ok
Aft this
because we say A = $\left( \frac{6 - \sqrt{3}}{4} \right) x$ and B = $5 - \left( \frac{6 - \sqrt{3}}{4} \right) x$
Velt
Oh np
๐
now adding them cancels out X completely so you get the maximum product which happens only when $A = B$
Velt
so you simply do $\left( \frac{6 - \sqrt{3}}{4} \right) x$ = $5 - \left( \frac{6 - \sqrt{3}}{4} \right) x$
Hmm
Velt
Why A=Band not A>B?
Am>gm except when a=b
Oooh
Yeh
try 3 results
I got it
A = 5, B = 5
A = 6, B = 4
A = 9, B = 1
You could also try deriving this inequality urself
Alr
Doing
keep the answer in terms of the irrational
no need to insert value and try to simplify it further
its just more dirty division if you do
yeah
thats your ans
Closed by @trail cairn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
sure
bro grinding human eye and the colorful world in the background
Lol
Its physics
Y not friend?
sure y not
i sent
๐ ๐
I know I'm in CBSE too
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the answer 0?
is there any reason why you cannot simply calculate the roots?
Actually yeah I think it is doable with such little numbers
Like there's just a power of 3 and a second degree equation
Well you can simplify: alpha^3 = 3alpha-alpha^2 and then alpha^2 = 3 - alpha, and the same process for beta
So that everything has power 1 and becomes much easier to do calculations with
Yes it turns out you get a nice expression that can be simplified using Vieta in the end
@wary bison Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wary bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Heeeeelp heeeellp absolute values
Heeelp me please
fih

,rccw
which one
Yes
yes
What if its within the lines?
what lines
well
you split it up into cases
either the thing iside the abs value is 7
or
its -7
correct?
right
so 2x-1 = 7
and
2x-1 = -7
now you solve each one
and get your 2 solutions
right
because when I input it into the equation
2(-3) -1 = -7
yes
2*-3 = -6
Oh
-6 -1 = -7

ok
|-3 + 4 | = 5 + 2(-3)
| 1 | = 5 - 6
| 1 | = -1
yes its incorrect
Erm
I got a radical
Im insure if thats allowed
Sorry if I sound like an idiot
I missed the whole unit
@severe plaza Has your question been resolved?
u can @ me ill be around
.pin
@severe plaza Has your question been resolved?
are you still working on them? im here if u need
Woah 1 hour 17 minutes answering
@severe plaza Has your question been resolved?
my bad I probably wont get to it today
Ill open a new channel tomorrow
Closed by @severe plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey! I'm trying to solve this integral using u substitution, and I'm a little confused how we got from u to the integral on the bottom. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks!
rearrange the du term so u have dx = . . .
substitute that and u would get smthing like
$$\int \frac{1}{x^2} \dd u$$
JustToPro
can find the x^2 term using ur u-sub and then substitute again
Interesting, why does this work? It's a little unintuitive ๐
why wouldnt it 
u sub is just used to convert a integral from x variable to u variable , in hopes of simplification
tho personally , i wouldnt use that substitution
Is there something better you would recommend?
how would that work?
dx would become 2 sec theta tan theta
subbing back in
$$ \int \frac{\dd \theta}{2 \sec \theta \cdot \sqrt {2^2 \sec ^2 \theta - 4}} \cdot 2 \sec \theta \cdot \tan \theta$$
JustToPro
and then just basic simplification from here
whenever we have integral with sqrt {a^2 - x^2} or sqrt {x^2 - a^2} , i like to use trig sub
for the 1st , its x = asin theta and the 2nd one is x = asectheta
oh u havent learnt trig subs?
we have, I'm just behind
ty for the help!
np
Closed by @serene seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
tho is this from the book or smthing?
dont know why they didnt use trig sub
yea it's partway through the solution of a bigger integral in the book
its in the u sub section
oh , hmm
i wouldve just waited till after trig sub to do smthing like that integral
but whatever :D
๐คท
Orrr, you can fall into the dark side and compute the partial fraction with imaginary roots.
How does that work?
Do you understand both concepts separately?
I've dealt with imaginary roots before, if that's what you mean
And what about partial fraction decomposition?
Well, you usually use it when you have real roots, but there isnt anything actually stopping you from using it w/ complex numbers
don't the complex numbers get in the way though? I'm a little confused
Quite literally just use the partial fraction, compute the antiderivative of 1/(x+a), which is ln(x+a)
And fun enough, once you evaluate what those roots actually are, you get back the correct answer too. -> entirely contained in the reals
huh
interesting
ill have to look into that
is there a practical reason why someone would do this though, other than fun?
np, good luck
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with finishing this up
The beak can be applied the modulus function
huh
y=|x|
i'm unfortunately busy right now but that face looks extremely funny lol
isnt absolute for pointy shi
@proper otter Has your question been resolved?
@proper otter Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @proper otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
โ Original question: #help-27 message
y=mx+b
ax^{2}+bx+c
im using this equation for the green
but how can i make it face red
@proper otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a quick question, if I have matrix A, says I want to find the basis of row(A) and col(A), then why is taking the basis row(A) we take from A's RREF form, but col(A) is taking from it's original form?
You can also take the RCEF for col(A)
Wait I can use rows from RREF as basis for A because it is equivalent right
But columns changed and not equivalent
basis for A doesnt make sense. Do you mean basis for row(A)
Yes, but you could do RCEF for that
Yea I meant basis row (A)
Which is basically doing RREF on the transpose and then transposing it back
(or just using elementary column operations)
I have never tried RCEF before, but i think its the same for RREF but transpose it
Yes, transpose, do RREF and transpose back
Closed by @last parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, help me check answer
thanks in advance
@silk panther Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
this is not a valid proof
every circle is uncountable, yes
and P is countable
hint: consider the lengths of elements of P
the lengths?
yes, like length of a vector
a circle of radius r is the set of points of length r
yes
but P is not a circle
lets say P = {(a,b) : a,b in R}
so since P is countable, lengths of a and b is some number c
is it like that
Let Q = {||v||: v in P}
Q is a countable subset of [0, infty)
[0, infty) is uncountable
so we can find some r in (0, infty)\Q
ye
the circle or radius r is what we desire
for every point v in C, ||v|| = r but no point in P has length r so v is not in P
yes
but ngl I kept asking questions here and even if I understand the solution, I actually wanna know how you guys thought abt the steps
like thought process
so like for this question, my first thought is to think P is all those points forming like a circle, and since it's countable, there is always a "bigger circle" covering P
imagine the points on R^2
thats how I think
ok but what if P is unbounded
ohh then I can also imagine a circle between the distance of two points in P
man idk my thought process is kinda lame rn
what if P has no isolated points, eg Q^2
well either ways it's still countable, can't cover the whole R^2, so there must exist one point not in P
my point is in that case its very hard to imagine a circle between points
ok
brb
back
alr so here is my thought: Define a set for every point in R^2 that forms a circle
say that set is uncountable
then conclude there exists such point
dang
@silk panther this is not my solution but i could imagine how we could discover it
we want the circle to avoid P. equivalently we want the radius to avoid lengths of its elements, so we remove all the lengths from (0,infty). the result is nonempty bc (0,infty) is uncountable and P is countable. nonempty result means a suitable radius exists
length of v
we want the circle to avoid P. equivalently we want the radius to avoid lengths of elements of P
im confused by lengths of elements of P, is it like the longest distance between two points
length means distance from origin
nowhere does the solution say longer
what do we want exactly? Do we want to find a length that's not in Q?
yes thats why we remove Q from (0,infty)
ok i got the idea
Closed by @silk panther
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well it is bigger than the lower bound
and smaller than the upper bound

wait wat
?
what are having trouble with?
idk where to start
is it still this question?
yah
look at the dz dy dx
so the inner most is z = ...
middle is y = ...
and x = ... for the outermost
so x is the outermost integral
the order of integration in the question is different to what you gave
wait ik its swithced here
oh mb
yah
I did not see that
lets do i) since I think it is still not correct
yah ik its switched
alr
i just couldnt be bothered taking another ss lol
wait ill do it now so its not confusing
does these make sense
yeah
now when we change from dz dy dx to dx dz dy
we write out the bounds in terms of equations
like I did
z = y
oh yea
y = x^2
ok
x = 1
so from there
our inner most is x
and y =x^2 is our equation from before, so can you tell me x in terms of y
y = 1
y = sqrt(x)
so we have our bound for inner most integral to be
0 โค x โค sqrt(y)
can you do that for the middle and outermost?
wait why
yeah
to put it together
we have x โค1 and sqrt(y)โคx
or it is sqrt(y) โค x โค 1
maybe this is easier to see the bounds
@swift badge
we can see for the other ones as well
yag
from before we had z โค y , z โฅ 0
so 0 โค z โค y
this is the same as that before
does that make sense
@swift badge
@swift badge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
actually i try to seperate
i was struggling with n^2 * x^n
and i think i will intergrate twice
wait which part i opened the channel as soon as u deleted the message ;-;
9.2
integrate?? show your working please
wait
because we can just take sigma x^n, differentiate it, multiply both sides by x and differentiate again to get n squared and then multiply by x and we are done with the lhs
There is a closed form specifically for nยฒx^n
what form i dont really know
ok will try
Its x(1+x)/(1-x)^3
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i think we should intergrate the function if u derivative we will get n^ 4
its better for them to derive this answer rather than learn it and not understand
okay wait so
Fair enough, my bad
Can you show the original question?
Ah wait, nevermind.
It was closed because of timeout.
yea
and then just follow this after taking y as i said
because already starting with n squared gives us n^4 which is irrelevant here
yes i found the form
wrong, you multiplied by x in the RHS but divided by x in LHS
yeah yeah my mistake
apart from that this is the correct way ๐
perfect! now we already know the series for sigma x^n which we can apply here!
Closed by @devout wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
โ Original question: #help-27 message
yes?
is this bottom up method . i mean in exam we do top down from n^2 *x^n to the answer
but now we do from answer to n^2 * x^n
oh
note that i have sum n^2 * x ^n and try to find the answer. And what we are doing here is create something to = n^2 * x ^n, not n^2 * x ^n to = something
just a discussion
i get what u teach me
we will just reverse everything we have done so far, instead of differentiating, we integrate, and instead of multiplying both sides by x, we divide both sides by x
<@&268886789983436800> advertising/possible scam
this is my original idea =))
.close
Closed by @devout wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
derivative is the slope of secant as the two points tend to move close to each other. so what is derivative at a point
the derivative is the slope of the tangent line at that point
but it never speaks of the point
Wouldn't at that point it's already have the derivative formed from 2 points that is very small?
think of it like a limit. the secant lines โconverge to a lineโ when the points get closer together
ah
that line they converge to is the tangent line
but would it be correct to say "at the point"
ambiguous question but i can probably say sure
Closed by @ocean haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is AM that?
any arbitrary point on the line can be represented by the parametric equations
You have $x=4-\lambda$, $y=2\lambda$, $z=1+3\lambda$, so you can let $M$ have those coordinates
Civil Service Pigeon
and ofc $\overrightarrow{AM}$ is just subtracting the position vector of $M$ from the position vector of $A$
Civil Service Pigeon
Ahh ok
So any point on the line is just the equation of the line
And theyre tryna find lamda
yes that's the whole point of the equation of a line
mhm they're trying to find $\lambda$ for that specific point $M$
Civil Service Pigeon
When they find lamda, when you sub in the lamda that will get you point M
And how come you equate it to 0
Mb
Is it bc you use cross product
And cos90 is 0
shortest distance is obtained by the perpendicular
orthogonal vectors have dot product zero
because of this
cross product seems a bit high tech here imo
rip
Closed by @severe prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@lunar harbor come back goat๐
!noping
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
if you're gonna open a new help channel
MN = MO + ON
= -OM + ON
= ON - OM
so you're not correct in saying MN = OM - ON
Ah oops
But why
Ohhh
MO+ON
Makes sense
yes.
@severe prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would it be 2/9 or 1/9?
please show your calculations and/or why you think it's either.
so if there is 9 marbles and if there is a possibility of choosing a red and blue one with replacement as the problem says then its either 2/9 meaning the red and blue one or 1/9 meaning one of them was put back
I took the โreplacementโ thing to mean that the marbles are put back in right after you select them
yep
So, since each event doesnโt depend on the previous event, you just multiply the probabilities
So, whatโs the probability of selecting a red marble?
1/9
wait my mistake it would be 1/3
Exactly!
And then, how many blue marbles are there
1/4
1/9
4 blue
Out of how many total?
4 out of 9 total marbals
So:
4/9
4/9
And, like I said, since each event doesnโt depend on the previous event, we just multiply the probabilities
so the answer is 4/27?
Bingo!!
so now its asking the same question but instead of one blue and one red its two blue without replacement
Ok. So there are still nine in total, yes?
yes
So, when where are nine marbles, whatโs the probability to draw one blue marble?
1/9
How many blue marbles again?
So now, after this weโve removed one blue marble
Iโll be so impressed if you get this. Iโll be so happy.
Whatโs the probability of drawing another blue marble
3/9
Are there still 9 marbles in the bag?
yes
Are you sure?
3/8
You said without replacement this time
Bingo
So now, just multiply theyโre probabilities
@knotty pulsar, if youโre done, close the channel
Closed by @knotty pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that if $rank(x) = \omega$, then x is infinite
toast
In which context?
uh
rank is elast ordinal such that x subset V_alpha
never mind
.solved
Closed by @cerulean ruin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Uh.. Okay?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was curious if there was any website or program where I could experiment with different transformations and like shape the grid myself. 3blue has an engine, but I want to like do it with my mouse
@solid trellis Has your question been resolved?
No
@solid trellis Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with trying to find the domain and range of rational expressions, would anyone know how to help me here?
well for the domain you just need to find where the functions arent defined
in the case of fractions
this happens when the denominator is 0
and in the case of radicals
Uh-huh.
this happens when the inside of the radical is <0
Right.
right so do that
In case you were wondering, I am relearning precalc by studying math on my own.
For Calc II.
BUT I'm having trouble with stuff like the domain and range since it's been years since I last took it.
Any number BUT three I assume?
Uh-huh.
-# just wanted to comment: this is only true for square roots (and other even power roots). Cube roots can take negative values as input