#help-27
1 messages · Page 410 of 1
statistics btw
I've never heard of past papers at Papa Cambridge, but from the title, I would reckon that this is from previously given tests
@severe prairie Has your question been resolved?
I think you need to check for each of these properties
I feel like a, b coudl have multiple values tho
nvm yeah right continutiy
So you need to find b first
whcih will give you enouogh info to find a
To find b use fact that F needs to be right continuous
we know that F(6) = F(6+) = 1
so then b = 7/25
then use F is non decreasing to find other
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no idk how to
its a past paper this was the exam from previous years
wait whaat
@severe prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Someone help
,rcw
what have you tried
I know that gradient will be zero at turning point, so i try to do the equation y=x+9/x =0
did you not differentiate it first?
Hmm
I tried but derive is too big
use the power rule
huh
How to do it then
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Deriavitive
Yes i agree
Now help me understand actually pls
Ok can you help me understand now
Thats easy just substitide
Ye but for b?
F of x?
Yes
Dy/dx = 0
the point is, the derivative at the turning points is zero, so you solve the equation f'(x)=0
you have to differentiate this
don't forget the other x you have btw
So then -1×9 power -1-1?
After diffrentiate
😡
Waitt
It was x/9
So use power rule
Turns to
9 power
😡
Brother what is this
Yes
Then
Wait wait
oh yes
Your right
Howw
Whats the rule say?
I
Ok
No its ok
Why would you bracket out 9
Diffrentiate has propertys?
I didnt know that
How did you know that
Ok what do i search
Wheres my materials
Iam igcse edexcel
Iam just studying past papers..
No i only do past papers
Omg found it
Look
Thanks too much walnut
7 marks too, very big
Close
close.
@obtuse stirrup Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @obtuse stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to find powered variables values
Like
$5^x=25$
Weinnion
calculator
so like u trying to solev for the equation?
yes
so like tell me what is 25 expressed in powered form
,calc log(25) / log(5)
Result:
2
rewrite that into the equation
true enough
So you are telling me that \
$5^x=5^2$ (now we extract the base) \
Therefore, $x=2$ ??
yea
Weinnion
or u can use logs
Wait, tell me that logarithms and exponents are inverse operations
Yes
did you learn laws of logs yet?
So how can we find exponential value with logarithm?
so like a^b = c<=> log_a c = b
Maybe we i will learn here
Uhh can you use latex
I think u have to learn the basic of logs before doing that
This algebra 2 / precalculus math video tutorial explains the rules and properties of logarithms. It shows you how to condense and expand a logarithmic expression in addition to graphing and solving logarithmic equations.
Algebra Review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6sbjtJjJ-A
Logarithms - Free Fo...
I suggest u watch this
its helpful
Bro i know man $\log_a(a)=1$
Weinnion
Weinnion
$a^x=b$ $\rightarrow$ $x = log_a(b)$
Remember it as pulling the n out
Weinnion
is this how you take into log?
Just note that comparing bases only works when the base is not equal to 1
Closed by @vocal hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ABCD is a quadrilateral where AB=AD and BC not equal to CD, CA bisects BCD, prove A,B,C,D are concycli
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
well
2
i was usin
ptolemys extension
and somehow tryin to
find a contradiction
Idk what ptolemys extension is but
Draw a diagram
And think about what exactly you wanna prove
Actually why are you using ptolemy
Use the angle property of cyclic quadrilaterals
i tried but
not really very useful
i did
Would help to show what you've done so far then
well do you know about ptolemys theorem
I realized, the product property yeah
well tbf i didnt write stuff down i js did stuff in my diagram and erased it
yea extension is just for
normal quadrilaterals
and product is > the sum
so i was tryin to assume
its a normal quadrilateral
and tryin to contradict
@bitter sky Has your question been resolved?
@bitter sky Has your question been resolved?
@bitter sky Has your question been resolved?
@bitter sky Has your question been resolved?
Draw the circumcircle of BCD and ||consider the midpoint of arc BD that doesn’t contain C||
is that a hint
@bitter sky Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with algebraic expression
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
@tardy ravine Has your question been resolved?
whats your question
is there a question you re struggling with
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this question I know I need to replace the x or y to find the intercepts but once I get to solving for x I am struggling
Can u show ur work so far
yes
the last part i wrote is where i was just attempting to do something because i was lost
im hoping to get redirected to the right path
Even if u break it down u are not being able to find a real value of x intercept,are u?
Yes that when u draw a graph,u wont see the any intersection between the shape and x axis
That's the abcissa of center
Okay
So would the x intercept be -5 and the y would be 4?
Do we know what intercept means?
yes
I don't really know what abcissa is though
I know the intercept is where a graph meets the x or y axis
(x,y) is a point where x is abcissa and y is ordinate
No the ellipse doesnt intersect x axis
So we dont hv an intercept for x axis
This is a rough drawing ,u see the ellipse doesnt intersect x axis at all
Oh okay I see now
When u try to gind x intercept, set the value of y as 0 and for y intercept x=0
If u find non real value,u will know physically it doesnt intersect the axis
But if u want to put values ,u can try inputting the complex number u get after u plug y=0
Okay
do you think you could show me how I would go about solving for them through the equation?
thank you for the help btw
Lemme try
That's great
U too
.close
Closed by @crystal saffron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what do I do after considering the mid point of that specific arc ? Draw the quadrilateral from that point ?
@bitter sky Has your question been resolved?
also it will be helpful if someone can help me solve it w
ptolemy
i really tried to use ptolemy but
didnt make a breakthrough
@bitter sky Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
dude wy does ts keep closin sob
my question
i tried that construction earlier, couldnt make muc use of it
and^
@bitter sky Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i know how to do base case and inductive hypothesis but no idea how to proceed from there
Please specify clearly where you are stuck.
k
so you proved that if it is true for $n=k-1$ then it is true for $n=k$? Or do you need help there?
Annie Maqionde
do we have to use induction>
yes
k ill give you a hint: consider the product $(x^k + \frac{1}{x^k})(x+\frac{1}{x})$ after assuming for $n=k,k-1$
Annie Maqionde
i asked chatgpt and it told me to do the same thing
how would i know to do that tho
I mean experience while solving problems mostly.
is there nothing to look for
I mean patterns exist; forms like above when there's like 1) addition of powers 2) two inductive assumptions
So then yk its multiplication
you need to multiply something by something to add the powers
and we use the 1/x so that we can diminish the power(two inductive cases)
also for your proof to be rigorous, you'll need to prove for both $x=1$ and $x=2$
Annie Maqionde
Closed by @olive mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
put x=z in equation 1
Yes
😿
So what do I do
If I add -Z to both sides will it be correct
so it doesnt matter if you write x+y or z+y
We don't have to do any solution?
what about the euclid axioms
yes
they didnt ask to state the axioms used
I have it
you may state any of the five axioms
postulate..
yea whatever
but like what about the axioms you used to prove z + y = 10
yea thats right
writing the equations is half of it
also dont put an equals sign before every line
Things which are added to the same thing are equal to one another
its misleading and (slightly) triggering
you may use a two way implies sign instead
.close
Closed by @orchid shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
good handwriting
Actually too much mastur
uh YEAH
So hand shake when I write
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let a = (1, −3, 2), b = (2, −1, 1) and c = (2, −5, 4) be vectors in R3
.
Write the vector c as a linear combination of the vectors a and b.
My peers are being so collectively strange about this. Just to confirm I'm not a psycho; we can't solve this yep?
I.e. there exists no linear combination

Closed by @ripe grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I would like to learn geometry. I am a beginner at it.
I am planning to learn it alongside number theory and abstract algebra
I am seeking for recommendations thereof.
i think #study-discussion
.close
Closed by @bitter garnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given a block ABCD.EFGH, with AB= 6; BC=4; CG=3. Find AD to BE
so I got the answer (6√5)/5
But I'm not sure if it's correct
I used the comparison of area of ABE
@sharp quartz Has your question been resolved?
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
<@&286206848099549185>
my work:
I'm stuck cus the answer I found isn't in the options
@sharp quartz Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
bro
(my friend said)
@sharp quartz Has your question been resolved?
You found the shortest distance between A and BE, but the question is to find the distance between AD and BE. You need a distance that is represented by a line that is perpendicular to both lines. Your lenght is only perpendicular to BE. But this link explains the whole thing: https://youtu.be/t7vDAe3-PV8?si=PBYAIqJZuvOlNI4U
In this beautiful video, we first look at the 3D animation of 2 skew lines and try to get a feel of the minimum distance between them. We then find this minimum distance in vector form. We then apply our knowledge of vectors to find the distance in cartesian form as well.
Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing—and savi...
Hope my answer helps
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey,
Can anyone please explain why 0^0 is undefined even though any other number raised to 0 is 1?
Thanks!
Can you explain why 0^0 is undefined even though raising 0 to any positive number gives 0? 0^x = 0? (for positive x)
if we look at it my way, it should be 0. Your way it should be 1. So which one should it be?
the simplest resolution is just leaving it undefined. For specific context (e.g. in combinatorics), its sometimes helpful to define it, usually to be 1.
Ohh, I see. Thank you!
This helped
.close
Closed by @karmic sun
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For context, Im taking a computer vision and image processing course and on their prerequisites, it hardly mentions anything about math background
Then I found out after starting the course that most of it is discussing applications of fourier transforms on processing of images for refining training data set (seems to occupy quite a notable portion of the course)
ATM Im self studying fourier transforms because I have never learnt it, my question is how important the more 'theortical' part is, i.e., do I need to understand some measure theory etc, will it significantly hinder my understanding of how fourier transform works if I dont understand the more 'pure-math ish part'
I do want to gain a holistic understanding but I don't think my time permits me to do that atm, probably will be revisiting fourier transforms quite formally in a math course next term.
you probably don't need to know measure theory to do fourier transform problems
e.g. this hw set has 0 measure theory
https://eceweb1.rutgers.edu/~gajic/psfiles/HW_4.pdf
the minimal measure theory you'd need is enough to understand the delta functional. it can come up if you ask yourself "how can something have area 1 but also 0 at all points except 0"
lots of people understand fourier transforms well enough for their purposes without having a single clue about how lebesgue integrals or distributions work
okay I will look into that then.
Just not exactly sure how much detail Im missing out because some resources and vid I watched kept mentioning L1 spaces and Lebesgue integrals and they currently mean nothing to me
Thx 🙏
.close
Closed by @vast drift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@devout snow how to smart in math:v
Okie:v
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
my equations for part b) are
\begin{align*}
\ddot{r} - r \dot{\theta}^2 - r^2 \sin^2 \theta \dot{\phi}^2 & = 0 \
\ddot{\theta} + \frac{2}{r} \dot{r} \dot{\theta} - \sin \theta \cos \theta \dot{\phi}^2 & = 0 \
\ddot{\phi}^2 + \frac{2}{r} \dot{r} \dot{\phi} + 2 \cot \theta \dot{\theta} \dot{\phi} & = 0
\end{align*}
higher!
I'm confused on the last part though
how do I verify that solutions of these correspond to straight lines? 
Not an expert in diff geo, but my first instinct would be "simply" convert from spherical coords to cartesian.
that sounds like an absolute horrid mess 
Yeah
I had that idea but really wanted to avoid it, since this problem's been enough work as is 
I suppose if I convert these eqs into Cartesian, I'd end up concluding smth like \ddot{x} = \ddot{y} = \ddot{z} = 0?
Well, maybe the inverse problem would be easier: take a general line in Cartesian coordinates, convert to spherical and then show that you get what you wrote
is it enough to verify that the curve maintains a constant angle with a known line for all t?
hmm 
Most line pairs in 3d don't intersect and aren't parallel. (Skew)
I'm not sure how you'd get from a line to these equations though 
I can see how you might get to a line from these eqs
like the hope would be to get this I think, and then conclude that the solution to the eqns is a line
...it's true that x.. = y.. = z.. = 0 implies that the solution is a straight line, right? 
Or a point
no curvature in the x, y, or z directions due to 0 2nd derivative
ehh, I'll ignore that case 
But that being said, there are other situations where you get a straight line with non-zero second derivatives. For instance, accelerating motion along a line
hm, that's true.. 
I guess the only way to figure out what I'll get is to actually do it, but I really kinda well... don't want to do it right now 
then I'll put it off till the 'morrow 
thank you for the help OE 
I'll close this for now c:
Maybe shoot your prof an email
it's not for a course actually
Ask if that's the path forward, or if there's a clever solution
I'm doing a DRP with a grad student, and she's given me this problem to work on, but idt she's yet solved it herself 
Oh nice
alright, I'll go and do another problem for now then 

Closed by @heavy current
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do these look good?
yea i think so
this might be a stupid question but idk how to do questions without variables. like how would i do this one tho 
well do you know how to plot y = 6?
yuh
do you know how to plot a single point (-2, -6)
yuh
f(x) is the same as this plot except at one point
do you know where?
oh sorry i have those swapped
f(x) = -6 everywhere except one point, and that other point is ?
-2
x=-2, what's the y value?
6
right. draw that graph and try to answer the limit question
okok thank you sm
would i just write this
The answer to the limit is correct but the plot is not
There's only one value of x that f(x) equals 6
@fickle moon Has your question been resolved?
Perfect
@fickle moon Has your question been resolved?
would i label the lines like this or with the limit
.close
Closed by @fickle moon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there a way to figure out each value without looking at the unit circle? i don’t have it memorized so i just looked at it
also, could you help me on the 2 that I have wrong
No
You should have all of them memorized and be familiar with the rationale behind it
Kind of... but not really there are some tricks to learn common ones without having to brute memorize the circle . it'll serve you better in the long run to get comfortable traversing the unit circle though
you can quickly convert radians to degrees as every pi radians is 180 degrees. That may help you visualize the angles better if thats the problem
@rich schooner Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is this slide saying?
Do you know what correlation is
yes
What examples did you learn that have a measurement that depend on two correlated variables
an incallibrated scale
@keen sundial Has your question been resolved?
not sure what a quadrature is
@keen sundial Has your question been resolved?
@keen sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Multiple choice?
@small surge Has your question been resolved?
Nope
This is a depressed cubic.
The discriminant of a depressed cubic in the form of $x^3 + cx + d = 0$ can be calculated using the formula below:
$\Delta = -4c^3-27d^2$.
To have two equal roots, $\Delta = 0$.
Restarter
@small surge Has your question been resolved?
What is depressed cubic?
Basically a cubic without the x² term.
I see
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Closed by @small surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
it doesn't appear to be a solution?
i mean it was just the straight up answer
it looks like a solution, but ren should have targeted Restarter's message instead of the LaTeX rendering.
!nosols, just for your information.
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
yeah accident, mb
.close
to be fair you kinda left the easiest part for the OP without even giving them a chance for a challenge and response.
it's closed already.
You have closed it.
Well as you can see.
The OP didn't understands it.
So it's not a solution for him. 😁 👍
I don't think posting a solution that isn't understood is still a justification for (pretty much) direct solsposting, but sure.
If that's so, alright then.
I'll refrain myself from posting anything in the future. 😁 👍
The last time I did that.
Nobody mentioned.
So was it a biased opinion then?
I don't know where else you did that, so I only mentioned it on the one time I saw it.
of course, I'm not the absolute authority here, so if the mods say you're fine, then I apologize and you may continue helping your way.
I'm not going to dig through your history and reprimand every single occurrence.
Sorry dear for the misunderstandings.
Not sure if he's the mod or not.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @small surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to do 3)?
@quaint hearth ici svp
woody6978
cest loppose je pense?
moi aussi
jai trouvé un resume
l'opposé c'est à dire ?
cela est la partie des PGCD
j'ai deja modifié le msg
tkt au debut c'est difficile puis en faisant pleins d'exercices tu trouveras surement celui ca super facile
@karmic basalt Has your question been resolved?
je n'ai trouvé pas une solution
je penser que je va passer a l'anlyse
merci!
.close
Closed by @karmic basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I get help on this one
how is v(t) related to a(t)?
I need a lot of help with intuitive thought
Velocity is the integral of acceleration?
yep, or you can say accleration is the rate of change of velocity
Yes
Integrate acceleration?
yep
now you're given that a(t) = -5cos(t)i - 5sin(t)j
Yea
since you said to get v(t), you integrate a(t), you just need to integrate -5cos(t)i - 5sin(t)j
But what about the initial stuff
but remember after integrating, the limits are from time t to 0
hence you will have to subtract the given initial value of v, v(0) = ....
Okay I don’t understand
when you integrate a(t), you gotta keep some limits right?
I don’t understand where limits came from
okay so when we intregrate acceleration, we cant use indef integ
as we want velocity at a given time right?
v(t) basically means velocity at definite time 't'
hence why the def integration and limits need to be applied
@coral zephyr Has your question been resolved?
@coral zephyr Has your question been resolved?
okay how about a different approach
and whatd u get?
I got v(t) = 5sinti - 5costj
erm
you differentiated it i think
similarily integral of sinx is -cosx
yup
v(t) = -5sinti + 5costj
thats correct!
okay good
but the problem here is that it initally too had some velocity
so inoder to find the velocity at a given time, you need to add its intially velocity
this is one of those basic concpets of physics
v(t) = -5 sin(t) i + 5 cos(t) j + C, determine C with v(0)
Wait what
??
What’s the objective here from this problem
v(t) is the antiderivative of a(t), but you can always add a constant value to it. This constant can be calculated with the initial consitions.
Same procedure from v(t) to r(t)
I don’t get the initial condition part and it’s relation to the constant C and why we are considering this to begin with
hey i think you gotta explain in more basic terms i tried the same thing, he got a lil confused
Example: if a(t) = 2 -> v(t) = 2*t + C
Yes
If v(0) = 16, then 2 * 0+C = 16 => C = 16, thus v(t) = 2*t + 16
sorry, fixed that typo.
Okay so
v(t) = 2t + c is a family of functions that are valid anti derivatives of a(t) correct
yes
Okay and an initial velocity will tell you the instantaneous rate of change of the object at an initial time correct
Instantaneous rate of change = velocity
Right
rate of change of displacement
It does not have to be the initial time, you have to know the velocity for some time
I’m tryna understand the logic behind the initial values
You could solve for c with v(5) = 20 for example.
Wait so essentially we want the correct function of the family of functions so that’s why we need to solve for C?
To calculate the constants of integration
correct
And the logic behind the initial conditions is that you end up with that C value
Because it actually narrows down all the possible anti derivatives into the scenario we need to consider
Right
Yes, it "narrows it down" to one possibility.
Alright, can I ask another question regarding derivatives like
Position-> velocity -> acceleration?
Sure
Okay so I just wanna make sure I have this right
When we talk about derivatives for vector functions, we are talking about the instantaneous rate of change at a point on the curve represented by the vector function
What that means is the displacement from some point a to another tiny point / a tiny amount of time ?
That sounds correct.
So I can say here that the derivative is the instantaneous rate of change of position right
yes
And subsequently I can say that acceleration is the instantaneous rate of change of the instantaneous rate of change of displacement?
Which is just the instantaneous rate of change of velocity?
yup spot on
And the rate of change would be the displacement vector / some time right
more accurate would be to right in derivative format
aka
dr/dt
But like geometrically what would that be
@shy osprey
As the green vector gets closer and closer to the blue one you get their difference to be the displacement vector at a very very small disposition?
thats just the explanation of the derivative format but yeah thats the geometrical one
yes
when it becomes infinitesmally small, you call it instantaneous
Why do we express that very very small displacement (red vector) as a vector necessarily?
Because when I think of displacement I think of changing from one point to another right
So why do we wanna express that as a vector necessarily here
as you are expressing other positions, blue and red as vectors too
@shy osprey I have another question, why do we end up with another function for velocity when deriving the position function?
Like why do you get a desperate curve
as in ?
Okay so let’s look at it this way If you differentiate a position function you are basically finding the instantaneous rate of change of position on all points on the curve right ?
correct
So why do you get a new function then
Like a new graph for velocity
because differentiation and integration is basically changing the fucntion right?
Is it because all those instantaneous rates of changes of positions give you a new position or something and all those new positions connect to a new path or something ?
if you look at it geometrically, at each point, the chnage is different than the actaul values
No but I mean like intuitively
Ooooooh
And all those changes are changes in position
And then it’s a new position
Connect all new positions together
there we go
= whole new path
Oh my God finally
Now I know what derivatives are after 2 and something years of first learning them
🌝
aw thats nice
Wait new question 😂
sure go on
So like what about integrals
I know they undo everything
But how does that work geometrically
Also we know integrals to also be for calculating areas and stuff so that’s a lil confusing
For why areas and volumes are related to rates of changes
explaining integrals geometrically might be a little challenging at your level
Oh
but for now just go with this
this should be sufficient
btw if udm me asking, which grade?
undergrad
ah so ur 19-20?
sure
i could be
i could be not
i dont wanna specify tbh
mr aristotle over here🥀
😂
oh sorry
youre good
.close?
can we keep it open for a little I might have more questions
no worries man have a great night and thanks for your help
<@&286206848099549185> I have a question, so I understand what derivative is graphically but what does the rate of change really give us
Like what does it really mean when we say velocity aside from derivatives and stuff
What does it mean to say a rate of change of something
Yeah nice question...I would also like a explanation to this
how much it changes given a rate=$
or speed of change
how fast or slow it changes from a to b
okay why is point b - point a / time b - time a that thing you just described
say before 10 years my height was 100 cm now 160 cm
the difference in time is 10 years and difference is height is 60
so the speed is 6cm/year
this is average rate of change
can you call that velocity in this instance
So like velocity isn’t something tangible in the same way position is right
like velocity is just how much something changes / time correct?
like thats just what it is you cant like see it or something
Yeah we can say that
But you know I'm coming from the psychology to understand mine cause from the question you asked...it kinda makes me feel like you want your answers beyond maths
So let me tell you what I know
yes but with direction which says it grow or degrow
go ahead
so velocity is just a scale that tells us how something changes per a specific amount of time
yeah right
So for me this is wat it is...
It measures how one thing responds when another thing changes.
If time moves, how does position respond?
If price changes, how do sales respond?
If effort increases, how does performance respond?
That’s rate of change.
It tells us not just what is happening, but how the situation is evolving.
In real life, your brain uses rate of change thinking all the time... especially in decision making.
If someone is walking and you see water on one side and nails on another end, you can predict their next step, that it will definitely be a clear spot where it is comfortable (the result). Why? Because you observe the current movement and the surrounding factors. From that, you can tell the likely direction of the next move.
That is the same idea mathematically.
When we look at a curve on a graph, maybe I have an irregular curve like that of a trade...now let me say that at a maximum point it start sloping downwards and I know that it won't eventually reach the bottom and out...it might change at another certain time, I can pick a point and ask:
“At this exact moment, which direction is this moving, and how strongly?”
If the rate of change is positive, it’s moving upward.
If it’s negative, it’s moving downward.
If it’s zero, it’s about to change direction or pause.
So rate of change is like a prediction tool.
It tells you the immediate next tendency of a system based on how it is moving right now.
So in simple words let me say:
A function tells you where you are.
Rate of change tells you where you’re heading next.
That’s the real-life meaning behind it...
Velocity is just speed
Although changed from a scalar to a vector form
Speed is the absolute value of velocity
When you say “where you’re heading next” that almost sounds like the position function itself
You mean in the context of vector valued functions right
velocity is just speed in a certain direction
you can interpret this a few ways
Velocity = speed • unit vector (gives direction)
Speed is the magnitude of velocity
etc
I’m still trying to understand this
@willow path
Like what is “how fast it changes”
velocity is the rate at which position changes
Which is??
in other words, velocity is the derivative of position
Yes but
Say i’m moving at 10ms in the x direction
every second, i’m covering 10 meters
my position at t=0 is 0, t=1 is 10m, t=2 is 20m
etc
the rate at which this position changes, is my velocity
if you plot those positions as a graph, you get a linear function
the slope of that function is the velocity
But like when you’re taking the derivative of a function at a point, you get the rate of change from a point to another very close point almost reaching your original point, that is gonna spit out some value, but what IS that value that’s spat out
The value that’s given is just the derivative at that point, it’s your instantaneous rate of change
If i take the derivative of my position and get a velocity of 10m/s
at that EXACT moment
i’m moving 10m/s
next moment could be different or the same
all that a derivative says is the value of that point
I’m sorry wdym?
Like
Take this
Or this
I’m dividing the change in one position to another by the time it took for that to happen
Right
@willow path
this is an approximation
the formula is an exact value
for the former, you’re picking 2 points (hopefully close) and getting a value of the average slope
not the slope of an exact point
the second formula is the limit definition of a derivative
Yeah I forgot to add the limit on the first photo
But I meant to represent velocity in two different applications
Normal functions and vectors
Velocity can be represented both ways yes
But I’m having trouble grasping the idea of the formula which is the rate of change
Like what are you really getting it’s not clicking for me
Like
You’re dividing distance by the time it took for the displacement to happen
Right
so you aren’t understanding what rate of change means specifically ?
yes in an approximation
I get the math but not the abstract concept
Like I don’t get the essence of it
You know?
<@&286206848099549185>
Essentially
you’re taking the value at one point
because you’re making the difference between the two point infinitely small
that’s what the limit definition does
you take a delta that approaches infinitely close to 0
giving you the answer for the point
does that make sense?
I get the operation mathematically but there’s two things I’m still not fully understanding:
1- once you have the velocity function that maps to all the infinitely small rates of change between every single point, when you plug in time t , you get it’s instantaneous rate of change of that point t and the infinitely small point right after it? Right before it?
Let’s start with 1
there is not “infinitely small point right after it
it’s just that pint
if hou take a measurement that’s infinitely small, it just gives you the point
think about it this way
i’m getting infinitely close to a value, Delta= 0000…..
can there be anything after an infinite string of zeros ?
no
there isn’t an end to infinity
so there’s no “infinitely small point” next to it, it’s just the individual point
But then that point at that time would just be still
Right
There wouldn’t be a rate of change because that point being there isn’t changing
Yes you’re taking a snapshot of a moment
Like a picture of time at the moment measured
If i take a picture of someone running, were they not still running?
What’s the point of the limit and the definition we have then
what grade
Undergrad
I know what a limit is I’m just trying to understand the abstraction behind derivatives
proves derivatives work
it’s exactly as it sounds, it’s a definition
it tells you that a derivative is when you take the change in value of a function, and shrink it down until you’re measuring just one point
and what it’s instantaneous change is
same way we can define an integral with a summation
Idk 🙁
Is it undergrad algebra?
So
what do yyou need help with
Understanding derivatives fully
So so far I understand that derivatives are the instantaneous rate of change of some point
But you wanna measure it’s change from point to another tho
This isn’t making sense
If you use point slope formula
you’re measuring the change between 2 identified points
we want to find the derivative of the initial point right
P1
so half the distance between the next point
How can it be that point only
But it’ll never be it right
if you half it infinitely, that difference shrinks to zero
not just close to zero
it is zero
It’ll always be so close to the point where it’s almost that point
i think you’re having trouble grappling with the concept of infinity
it’s not just close
infinitely close is the same as being at that point
So what does limit as Δt approach 0 mean
infinity never ends, if i’m infinitely close im standing right on that point
It’s approaching right
Notably, in this case it only works because what you are looking at is differentiable in the first place
So it’s literally that point
Yes that is one caveat
technically no
Okay so then we are dividing by 0 or what 🙂
essentially it is, the notation helps us define how we approach that point without running into the issue of dividing by 0
technically not the point, but for purposes of our calculation it is infinitely close to said point
fun nature of infinities
like, if you have the function $\frac{(x+1)(x-1)}{(x-1)}$, the function is discontinuous at x=1, but the limit of the function still exists at x=1
Mr. BananaHead
Yes but in terms of derivatives
There’s rate of change that we wanna calculate
Shouldn’t it be between TWO points???
instantaneous rate of change
no there doesn’t need to be 2 points as we make an infinitely small gap
there is no average
a derivative isn’t an average
it is an exact value at the point
the essence of the limit process is that you are removing that second point while still getting a useful result
(assuming no discontinuity
Oh
Wait so
This is confusing ngl
I’m tryna wrap my head around how we are considering the change in displacement/ time of just a single point
i’d recommend finding extra content to watch on how to better understand the nature of infinities
yeah, calculus is difficult to learn because when you learn it, it is very different from any other mathematics you've taken beforehand
incredibly helpful for calculus, they can be weird so it’s about coming to terms with their implications
because velocity isn’t displacement/time
average velocity is
Velocity is instantaneous rate of change from a point to another ?
what you have there is the formula for average velocity, velocity itself is defined as the derivative of position
dp/dt
it is the rate at which your position changes at your exact point, not from one point to another
Oh
Okay how does your position change at its exact point
position itself doesn’t change at the exact point, it just defines the rate of change at that point
position changes relating to whatever position function you’re using
in the most simple case, a linear one
Take p(t) = 2t
each t value is your position, that derivative just tells you how fast your position will be changing
in this case v(t) = 2 so constant change
Yeah but like
maybe it would actually be easiest to explain in terms of integration
How does the limit as h approaches 0 of this give you what you just said
that h becomes smaller and smaller
until it is essentially zero
so imagine that second point being dragged closer and closer until it’s on top of the other point
Yes
Then you have a difference of what divided by what?
When that happens
When it gets smaller and smaller infinitely
if the speed is constant, it's very easy to calculate their future position for some time t. it's just the constant velocity c multiplied by the change in time t, and you get ct
Then it’s what - f(a)?
but if the velocity is not constant, then it will follow some derivative function f'(t), and you will need to integrate along that function from the current point in time to some future time t to find their future position
(x+h)^2 - x^2 / h
the main idea here is that $h \neq 0$
Mr. BananaHead
But @willow path said it’s eventually 0
it's not
for all practical purposes it is
it’s not exactly 0
the limit is a separate value from the value of h itself
yes the calculation is performed first
anyways, i have to go to a club meeting so ill let Banana take it from here goodluck man
Thanks for the help
it's like how $\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1}{x} = 0$ but $\frac{1}{x} \neq 0$ for all x
Mr. BananaHead
it's an object's current speed in a certain direction
Okay, so
Are we considering any displacement
for our purposes, we are only looking at motion along a single line
so direction is either positive or negative
But I thought we established velocity = instantaneous rate of change = change in position/ certain time
Is this correct
if you are looking at 2D or 3D motion, you can have a separate derivative for each direction of motion
then you start getting into partial derivatives and stuff like that so to keep it simple, it's best to only look at motion along a line for now
Yeah but did I have the definition right ?
yes
Okay so when we say change in position / certain time
What’s the change in position at some point a when considering it’s derivative
basically it gives you an approximation of where the function will be close to the point you take the derivative at. This takes the form of a tangent line at that point
the closer you are to the point, the better the approximation the tangent line yields
But we are talking about “change in position”
So from point a to another point?
So another point - point a
/ time it took to go from point at to another point
See rhinos what’s confusing me because it’s from point a to where
If it’s at that point
