#help-23
1 messages · Page 387 of 1
If to ignore this domain from the question
And follow this it will get reflected over x axis still
y-axis*
Because I can put x = 1
And it will stay at x as my input, but the function will evaluate for -x
you can put x = 1, and the function will be defined at the input (-1)
Thus reflecting over x
but notice that for every positive x you put, the input will become the negative x
Yes
and vice versa
Yes
that's exactly what reflecting over the y-axis does
I don't understand
positive x-coordinates get sent to negative x-coordinates and vice versa
I knew you would ask this, hence why I said this
oh goodness.
?
I mean the original graph is based on f(x), yeah
Im talking about the transformed one
but suppose you have some function f such that at x = 1, f(x) = 2
and at x = -1, f(x) = 4
now consider f(-x)
for x = 1, what is f(-x)?
-4
No
Here 4
So it didn't reflect over y axis
x is 1 it stays in the second quadrant
but x = 1 produces an output normally reserved for x = -1
and vice versa
and that is the key here
if this doesn't help then I apologize and I'll probably step back for now
You know function transformations is probably the second hardest topic I've ever had in my life in Math
First one was complex numbers
I have heard of your struggles, hence why I said what I said at the start
here.
I am the hardest student to teach to in my whole class
Nothing comes easy for me
And I am struggling
Wait
Is there a difference between x and f(this x)?
Because currently I have a perspective and x is different from the x inside f(x)
I'm going to try one last time
Why is this shit so confusing
for f(ax + b), think of x as some raw material, ax + b being a machinery that prepares this raw material for processing, and f being the actual processor that outputs stuff
Ok
so if x is modified in any way, then f takes the modified input
Yes
eg: f(2x) doubles x before using it as an input
but x is separate from 2x
I mean the input as x
and the operation for x before input
the original input is always x. the modified input is whatever is in the parentheses as an argument to f.
yes. but for f(x + 5) for instance, x = 2 gets you f(7)
Yes
So what is missing in my knowledge
I don't understand why any operation on the input is so confusing
I don't know. I'm not your teacher
My teachers doesn't teach shit anyways
That's why I have my book and this community
And internet
I'm sorry to hear that, but if I'm not going to be of use any more in this channel I'll take my leave first. I will say though, based on what I heard about you, you might find it beneficial to get a personal tutor
So the problem is that I was paying turbo big money for tutoring
Because I am on IB course, and the tutors cost at least 5x what the normal cost
And I realized that with good source and material I am able to do what we do on the lesson in 15 minutes by myself
then I invite you to ponder on possible reasons your lessons are taking longer than 15 minutes.
No I mean that if on the lesson I was able to sovle 3 questions, I can solve by myself 9 in the same time
but either way, I don't think a help channel is the place to discuss personal problems, so I will disengage for now.
good luck!
Yeah no personal problems, thank you
!done?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
oh ok
Maybe you can help
Or already too tired
With me
I am the server destroyer, the help channel absorber
I don't know what else I can say that Towa hasn't already
maybe go play with some graphs on Desmos/Geogebra or something
That's what I am doing currently
instead of having text explanation after text explanation chucked in your face
then I'm not sure how else I can help you, sorry.
What does?
Ok I’m gonna close the ticket for now since I’m gonna be away from the book
Thanks for answering but I’m closing
Gonna come back today or tomorrow
.close
Closed by @kind galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys when do u take +C when u integrate and when u dont
indefinite integrals require +C. definite integrals don't
quick answer:
+C when you get antiderivatives (indefinite integration)
and not when you find area under the graph (definite integration)
if you wanna know why, we could start with the indefinite integration case.
yes pls
and is definite migration only for area under graph and y
definite integration can be used for a lot of things
antiderivatives are used when you have a differentiated version of the function and you wanna find how the original one looked like
to show why we need +C
oh
oh differentiate mb
2
2
2
great
so now we have the differentiated version of every one of the functions
care to integrate it? (antiderivative)
integrate
2
2
2
and maybe you notice something interesting
integration of 2 is 2x
but
we don't know the other part it could be 1,2,3,4, right ?
so we use C
exactly!!!!
so there is no way to find that C
err you can, depends on the information given and the context of the question
but yeah, you cant if its just straight up "antiderivative this"
antiderivatives propose a family of possible original functions and the only difference between them is the C.
oh
and u only area under graph
y*
as ann stated, definite integrals are used for many many many things
or wiat
i might be misunderstnading your statement
wdym y only area under graph?
our most famous use is the area under the graph shtick!
bye
i mean you can find volumes using definite integration
and also if you integrate speed of a particle you can find the arc length of its path
(while integrating velocity gives you displacement)
Y C doesn't matter in the area under cirve
you know how $\int_a^b f(x) \dd{x} = F(b) - F(a)$ right
Ann
the indefinite integral taught in highschool is an abomination
my school has not taught integration (I'm not there yet)
yes, the C's cancel out
Closed by @radiant canopy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help understanding this function when it x goes to infinity. I understand arcsin goes to 0 which gives 0 but I don’t understand why arctan gives pi/2 when x goes towards infinity
Perhaps you should recall how arctan is defined
what is arctan(tan(x))
Tan inverse
no..
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
on x
This isn't an open question, please go somewhere else if you aren't the one asking for help
I thought that dude was gone
seems like it
.close
Closed by @fiery olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the downside to polynomial of best fit? I had an idea for a model I wanted to train with gradient descent but I realized I could just replace it with an n-degree polynomial bc of its power series expansion.
its possible that your polynomial of best fit doesnt really represent the data
Finding the best fit for some given polynomial is easy but it can be harder to justify the degree of polynomial you choose
right i guess im asking how to deal with overfitting
Is there literature on selecting the right degree?
whats the damn test called
I'm training this on asset price movements
Some discussion here
Although we have some stats people here I think if you had more involved questions the stats server in #old-network is probably a better place to ask
@tribal sparrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tribal sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For a transformation of function y=f(x), why does y=f(qx) for q < 0 reflect it over y axis?
Negative values of x become positive, and vice-versa
Yes but shouldn't that reflect it over x axis?
Since function will be evaluated let's say for example x = 1 then f(-(1))
remember that the y-axis is the line x = 0
Yes
X is mapped to whatever -x is mapped to
Isn't x, and f(this x) different things?
so going from x = 1 to x = -1 and so on should reflect across x = 0
Yes but the graphs are made in respect to x
Not to the operations done that will actually feed into the input
if you start out with the point (x, f(x)) on the graph that gets sent to the point (-x, f(-x)) in the transformation
I'm assuming by graphs you mean transformations; since all transformations are done on x before the function f is applied to find the respective y, and no additional transformations are done afterward, nothing changes about the y-value for a certain x
From this reply
if all you knew about the graph of y = f(x) is that it passes through the point (2,3), then the only thing you know about the graph of y = f(-x) is that it passes through (-2, 3)
Ok, for what value will function g be evaluted if g = f(-x) and let's say x=5?
Yes then I need to input -2 to get the same y output as before transformation
yes. so if inputting the opposite x value gives the same y value as originally, that should look like a horizontal mirroring
Ok so I feel stupid right now?
Im refering to this from my notebook on stretched and relfections page
if q will be q < 0 then f(-x)
Let's just stay with the reflection stuff
So if I put into this function x = 5, the input will be -5
f(-x) is just the special case of q = -1
Yes
And the point will be drawn (5, f(-5))
when you think about transformations, it's good to think about only one input-output pair at a time. so if you only know that the pair (5, f(5)) is on the graph y = f(x), then you don't know what the point (5,f(-5)) looks like on the graph y = f(-x), because you don't know f(-5), but you do know that (-5, f(5)) is and that it's also on y = f(-x)
But im assuming that you are explicitly saying that x is different from f(this x)?
And also the point (5, f(-5)) is like a reference to confirm on what the function will be evalueted for
Im just trying to work with it but I think I may end up confusing myself even worse 
like both (5, f(-5)) and (-5, f(5)) are on the graph y = f(-x), but only one of them can be found only from knowing the original input-output pair (5, f(5))
so it would be more useful to think of (5,f(5)) as being "sent" to the pair you can find from that info, which is (-5,f(5))
But Im saying that this will be the result for y of this opeartion
But you know I still don't understand this reflection
Everything about the x variables seems super complicated
when you think of function transformations, you should think of them as acting on pairs of input and output (x,f(x)) rather than just the output
Explain further
like in this case we are seeing that the transformation y = f(x) to y = f(-x) is better understood as acting on the input x rather than the output f(x)
Yes but output is also very important here
Because it will be the final verdict of y cordinate
So for y = f(x), y = f(-x) will only reflect over the y axis if x < 0?
Because only then x will be plotted on the negative side of axis
no, it reflects both
What
the point (-5, f(-5)) from y = f(x) is mapped to (5, f(-5)) on y = f(-x)
Yes
because -(-5)) = 5
Wait what
What it will be for the point (5, f(5)) for the reflection/
What would I do to reflect this over y axis?
the point (5,f(5)) is on the graph of the original function y = f(x) but it is not on the transformed graph y = f(-x)
y = f(-x) is just a function. the transformation (reflection in this case) is the process which takes pairs of input and output from y = f(x) and turns them into pairs of input and output from y = f(-x)
I don't understand
like y = f(-x) has absolutely nothing to do with reflection on its own, it's only reflected in comparison to y = f(x)
Ok, let's say the function is linear, I feed 1 into x for f(x)
The point will be (1,1)
What wil happen for the reflection function?
if you only know that the point (1,1) is on the original function, then the only information you know about the reflected function is that (-1,1) appears on it. so we say that the point (1,1) is sent to the point (-1,1) by the reflection
isn't x the same for both functions?
think of the reflection as being a function which takes in pairs of numbers (input-output values of the old function) and returns pairs of numbers (input-output values of the new function)
I put x the same for both functions
But they return me different y
but if you only know that it was reflected horizontally, it would be more useful to think of it as putting in different x to those functions to get the same y
if you only think about putting the same x in, you can't say anything about the relationship between the two functions
Why?
like say you only know that (1,2) is on the original function graph. so you know f(1) = 2 and nothing else about the function. it's true that (1, f(-1)) is on the graph of the new function, but that tells you nothing because you don't know what f(-1) is, or even if it exists. the only thing you know for certain is that the point (-1,2) is on the graph of the new function y =f(-x)
So they match output?
I need to use different x to get the same output
As before transformation?
yes
THat doesn't make any sense
What if I want to put anything that I want to x, for fun
And I know the range for this function
Ok you nkow what
Im gonna close this ticket
It's too late for this shit
.close
Closed by @kind galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\textbf{Axioms - Separation Scheme:} \$\forall$ L-formulas, $\varphi(u, z_1,z_2,...,z_n)$ have an axiom $\forall z_1,\forall z_2,, ..., \forall z_n \forall x \exists y \forall w ( w \in y\iff (w \in x$ and $\varphi(w, z_1, ..., z_n)))$.
This is the exact definition i wrote down, I dont fully understand what its trying to say
toast
especially like what is u?
for all variables z1 to zn, and for all sets x, there exists a set y such that all elements of y are in x and satisfy these L formulas?
@tranquil geyser Has your question been resolved?
toast
or how do i better interpret this? is $\varphi$ a function?
toast
@tranquil geyser Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil geyser separation says that we can take the elements of a set that satisfy a formula, and they will form another set
if you recall setbuilder notation from earlier math content, separation is what allows us to do that
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-23 message
by setbuilder notation, i mean from a set $A$ and statement $\phi$ concerning the elements of $A$, we form the set $\cbr{x\in A:\phi(x)\text{ is true}}$
ロケット・ジャンプ
@tranquil geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-23 message
@tranquil geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
How to I differentiate
Ln(2-sqrtx)^2
I got to 2ln(2-sqrtx)
What is a for a/a +b
i think you forgot to apply the chain rule
wdym
do you know what the derivative of ln is
ive genuinely never seen this form before
Its what my textbook says
but for this ques youll have to apply chain rule twice btw
lemme clarify what i meant:
let x^2 be f(x)
ln(x) = g(x)
2-sqrtx = h(x)
the function you want to diff is f(g(h(x)))
just use this form tho, no need to use A/ax +b
Wheres x^2 come from
wdym
that or chain rule
@pastel pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
x sqt - y sqt = 30
s
otherwise I assume it's $\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{y} = 30$ with no instructions
oh it's a square
y
Factor your expression on the left
have you heard of the difference of two squares?
if you have, you can do what riemann asked to
(also I'll step down and let riemann take over if needed)
ok
merely factorizing 30 would be sufficient, especially for this problem (not a good advice in general for such problems however)
that would work too, yeah. perhaps a better method than what I have in mind
yea, only works if you know some basic nt
you should use the symbol ^ for exponents, and write this as x^2 - y^2 = 30
otherwise nobody will understand you
which is sadly not a school syllabus subject for most part
I was going to have OP list factors
then compare the factors of the LHS to the factors of 30
ok
@surreal kayak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! Is anyone here familiar with desmos? Im a highschool student and i genuinely need help with my "desmos art project" they said we can make anything and i'm making a guitar, but im geuinely struggling to figure out how to make the body of the guitar and google and youtube arent helping much
like how
ig what do you want it to look like?
a good place to start is polynomial curves i think
perhaps start by sharing the image of the guitar you are using for reference and what you have tried so far
i think elliptic curves could have a useful shape for a guitar body
Heres the thing this is kind of a research project we havent really worked with graphing curved lines so im tryna research that rn
or polynomial curves in general 😛
This is kinda what i figured out so far but im not happy with it
try throwing random stuff into desmos with sliders and see where that gets you
Thats one way to go ig
also
sliders are great for adjusting shape
xx = x^2
Ik
As in ellipses or as in y²=x³+ax+b lol
the second one
It wouldnt let me😭
but also sure conic sections, try those
caret ^?
???
Im on phone💀
Bezier curves are cool too
desmos' phone keyboard has a dedicated "x^2" key does it not
here's an example elliptic curve: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/sltf4mulpe
they look very guitar-like 🙂
Oo nice
you would have to modify the top tho
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/bgvoyeztw6 here's a project with bezier curves if you want to see how they look
since it diverges out
Currently lookong for it
Thats so cooll
The "code" isn't exactly a shining example of how yours should work probably lol
Nvm i found i
It's a bit scuffed in order to be able to make 100 of them
Yeah
oh yeah i also have a project on bezier curves
i did it because my calculus textbook told me to
I need to do some huge research💀
ok so
Ooh nice
do you know the binomial theorem
No....
Where i am in grade 10 they teach like- domain and range and linear graphs mostly
some of the motivation for bezier comes from the binomial theorem i think
This project would be good for @autumn sundial to play around with just to see the kind of shapes you can get out of bezier curves
You can probably get away with just not expanding the binomials
i had a project where you could do up to 10 vertices but it's lost to time 😔
or hmm
maybe they actually naturally arise
and it's factoring that gets you the binomials
lol idk
i didnt really study beziers that much 😛
Anyways if I have 2 points a,b
The natural way to have a path between them is to start at a and move towards b at a constant speed
Yea
So if t=0 I should be at a, and t=1 I should be at b
I can parametrize my line as (1-t)a + tb
I think i get it?
to multiply a point by a real number, just multiply each component, to add points, just add components
ohh i see the motivation behind bezier curves now
It's shorter notation so I don't have to write out the individual coordinates when I'd just be doing the same thing to both of them
so you know how drey talked about linear interp
you extend it quadratically
i'll explain in detail

so you have 3 points $(x_1,y_1)$, $(x_2,y_2)$, $(x_3,y_3)$
nadat12
you want to take these points
so that there's a curve that gets from $(x_1,y_1)$ to $(x_3,y_3)$
nadat12
so obviously, if our polynomial is B, then B(0)=(x1,y1) and B(1) = (x3, y3)
the fun part is this:
so from point 1 to point 2
lineraly interpolate
$(tx_1+(1-t)x_2,ty_1,(1-t)y_2)$
and from point 2 to point 3
linearly interpolate
$(tx_2+(1-t)x_3,ty_2,(1-t)y_3)$
nadat12
so we have those two points
nadat12
NOW
linearly interp from these two points
that's where it gets fun!
$(t(tx_1+(1-t)x_2)+(1-t)(tx_2+(1-t)x_3),t(ty_1+(1-t)y_2)+(1-t)(ty_2+(1-t)y_3))$
nadat12
Here's a picture btw
that's what i described looks like 
Ohhh
This calrified it sm thank you😭
sorry for the very vague explanation
it's hard to explain
No no that was actually a rlly good explanation
Yeah that was good
No problem
the general bezier form follows $B(t)=\sum_{k=0}^n\binom nkt^{n-k}(1-t)^kP_k$ if you're wondering
nadat12
where Pk are the points
4 points is usually used because it's the minimum number needed to get interesting behavior
All the 3 point examples kind of just look like bendy quadratics
the weird parenthesis thing is called the "binomial coefficient"
And if you have too many points it becomes pretty hard to understand the behavior
Ooo
the bezier curve animations as linear interps over linear interps is satisfying
Long curves are usually made out of sections of multiple 4-point bezier curves
Yeah
check out this
Wow
Woahhh
linear interps over linear interps
Reminds me of the fourier drawing animations almost lol
anyways wish you luck on your project! hope this enlightened you!
There's some clever way to chain together bezier curves so that the first derivatives always match
but idk it
yeah, i think that's what my calculus book was studying 🤔
id have to do it by hand
Yes thank youuuu i think i can get somewhere w this info
Thank you too dreyyy
No problem!
Out of curiosity what math are you doing right now?
Idk ig lol
Ig not
im still here just looking at the wikipedia page for beziers
Ig not lol
uh im doing abstract algebra
Ooh nice ok
i took some multivar calc but it was confusing 😵💫
That one's fun
as in read it from a textbook
Multivar calc has a lot of unmotivated stuff that gets motivated later
As in like, in later courses lol
kinda like teaching high schoolers determinants and matrix multiplication and stuff
Or even how those are computed in a college intro linalg course
When I first took it I forgot stokes/greens/etc the second the final was over lol
lol me too
no one remembers all those nasty confusing theorems
stokes?
Generalized Stokes yeah
nice, good thing i got a textbook a few weeks ago
though I still don't actually understand how you would prove generalized Stokes
Ironically it's the definition of boundary which is the hardest part to understand
something about cochains 💀
jordan curve theorem but generalized?
oh no
Probably not theres some weird algebraic notion of the "boundary" of a...
,ti
The current time for nadat12_50450 is 01:17 AM (PST) on Sun, 15/02/2026.
@autumn sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @autumn sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this supposed to be solvable? chatgpt made it and cant answer it. i got t = 17.6381s
and 784 m
!noai first and foremost
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
even for generated problems
ill check if there is a solution
that said, i would make velocity-time graphs here
i did not graph anything i just used the 4 or 3 kinematics equations
im in ee 1st year 2nd sem btw
wait
ok, my suggestoin stands though
hey hang on
once A and B both go into constant speed, isn't A running at 18 m/s while B is running at only 8 m/s?
B is literally too slow to catch up @sick wyvern
don't trust gpt to generate problems
its not possible for b to ctahc up
i checkedd every interval
a achives a speed more than twice of b
and has coverd more dist
okay thanks, but i need to ask a question
in any case there's a catch up problem, and let's say b starts 5 s later, should i write it as t - 5 or t + 5?
if u want to try these types of questions i know some great books
i would love that
in these types of problems when someone starts late
calculate the distance the other person has covered'first
in the time it takes for the other perso to start
then when they both are in the same timeline
use kinematics from there
so like lets say a started 5 seconds early
distance travvled by a in those 5 seconds would be 37.5 meters
add this to the equation and then start them at the same time
and if a has like, accelerated for a time 3 s, what should i do? should i add 5?
so if has accelerated for 3s at 2ms^-2 for example in 5 seconds they would have travelled 25 meters
speed would be 10ms^-1
from there on uu can write x(a)=25+10t
and if be starts with a velocity of like 4
write b as x(b)=4t
what did you use as t for this one
vi = 0
yep
5 second head start for a
so what if like a accelerates for a given time say 3 s, then stops but still moves at a constant velocity, and b starts 5 s later
calculate the distance travelled by a in 5 seconds??
yep
then check whats up with a after 5 seconds
so like after 5 seconds treat the distance travelled by a as a funtion of time t and add the distance travelled before as a constant
and for b
take distance as funtion of the same time t
alright thanks dude
i should expect problems like this to appear tomorrow
what the
Idk
you can use displacement using average velocity equation?
For his question?
U will have to
Split it up
Into different parts
Like when b leaves the cycle
A picks it up
And stuff
im going to try and solve it
@sick wyvern Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sick wyvern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I would like to prove this
Here's what I've done so far
I would like to add, here $f$ is continuous
wai
Let the total bounded variation on $[a,c] \subseteq [a,b]$ be $M$. Let $(a_n)$ be a strictly increasing sequence converging to $c$ such that $ \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \abs{ f(a_{i+1}) - f(a_i)}≠M$. There thus exists a strictly increasing seqeunce $(b_n)$ converging to $c$ such that $ \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \abs{ f(a_{i+1} - f(a_i)}<\lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \abs{ f(b_{i+1})-f(b_i)}≤M$.
I'm trying to get a contradiction here, not sure how to
wai
@desert pasture Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @desert pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please explain why I’m getting F wrong
The pink version is what I’m doing and the black version is the model answer
Think they did a different approach but shouldn’t we get the same answer? Thanks
@runic ruin Has your question been resolved?
the problem is that you treat the force R as a component, and this is the result, if you want the point P to be in equilibrium, the force R would have to be applied in the opposite direction
So, the equation should be F - 30*sin(60 deg)= Rcos(60 deg)
So for every resultant force I change the sign or something because the arrow goes the opposite way?
I mean in these kinds of problems
you have two options: the force R is the result of adding the vectors of the other two forces
so you can add these two forces (taking into account their signs) and equate them to the force R (on the other side of the equation)
or you can imagine that you apply force R in the opposite direction (i.e. you balance the forces acting on point P) and then the system is in equilibrium and the sum of forces on each axis is zero
Closed by @runic ruin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
shortest approach to compute $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n^2+6n+10}{(2n+1)!}$
rak³en
the given solution is to let m = 2n+1 and then compute the sums m^2/m!, m/m! and 1/m!
over m = 3,5,7,..
which is quite long and tedious
i mean you're gonna need to reduce this to sums of reciprocal odd factorials somehow right
let me cook
well thats what i am asking is there a shorter way to reach that?
maybe some weird level 1000 algebra foresight split
(duh who else could you possibly be referring to)
To your very last message?
this is the beginning of what i would do
hmm put n = 2,3,4 to find A,B,C?
Beautiful handwriting damn
the equations aren't very pretty though >_<
okay ig
What do you want? A two line solution? You won't get it!
well no something that involves less calculation i suppose
guess i wont find one
ty
I don't think you can find one due to that factorial, unless there exists pre-made formulas for very specific problems like this, which would be useless in the first place
.close
Due to that odd factorial*
the best you could do is learn formulae for odd/even factorial sums of the form m^k/m! for some integer k
right
Probably not but worth trying
Closed by @grim plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you can do it in many ways
if you are gonna put values of n i recommend 0 and ±1/2
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-23 message
the key fact to use afterwards will be that the sum of all reciprocal odd factorials is sinh(1)
@grim plover can you share the given sol that you were looking at
@grim plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how should i go about solving this?
I would probably expand the LHS, pull everything to the LHS, and then treat this as a quadratic in x
there's very likely a smarter way to do this but that's my first instinct
yea I wasn't considering that unless you say so
i think quadratic is the smartest way to solve this
looks about right
quadratic formula for when b is even
oh you skipped the factoring step and the cancellation against the 2 in the denominator
yeah theres a shorter formula for when b is even
fair
damn
i believe its uh
in that case the only thing I would suggest here is to write a brief explanation for why the negative solution is rejected
ill just write it down
cuz you dw to give examiners a chance to put a big fat "why?" on your paper
tbf i thought you js factorised the 4 and cancelled the 2 out
same, I thought they did that too
Are you sure its rejected? 🧐
tbf that formula is probably just a simplification of the quadratic formula for a special case
OP seems to have rejected it
unless I'm a dumbass and there's another reason why the \pm became just a +
tbf i would still stick to the original formula, cuz simiplification is easy
not beyond me
oh i rejected the minus sigh cause
I never use the formula personally
you self depricate a lot eh? chin up king
1 < √(e^3+1)
I speak only the truth
So
if you have a justification best to write it on paper anyhow
nah you're goated dw
but uh hm
Does it say there should only be one sololtioun?
it does say that problems can have more than 1 solution
i don't think this is one of them
Why
eh you cannot reject this
cause the original problem was ln(x) + ln(x+2) = 3
so yes I'm a dumbass
Oh yeah then you can reject it
oh wait so there's more context
yeah
argh the lack of original context here is killing all of us
Say ln function is not defined for x<0 or something
aight
my bad
(I had a strong feeling that was the case
)
I had thought so too but I do not like to assume
,ti
The current time for google7133 is 11:07 PM (+08) on Sun, 15/02/2026.
yeah its like 11pm
but I guess my brain didn't think that that x(x-2) inside the ln was sus
it's 11 here too
dang
anyway ok my bad for spewing a bunch of bs and confusing you probably
anything else though?
none as of rn
ill probably leave the channel open unless the last question offers me no difficulties
sure thing
does this just have no solution?
oh wait nvm
i forgot exponents can be negative
actually
is there no solution?
I believe so too.
i think this is correct?
indeed.
ooo good job :3
welp that's my last question for the night
Closed by @slender steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
well done!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Tysm this makes alot of sense
I’m still getting used to the notion of a formula ngl
is there like a good analogy for L, L-alphabet, L-terms, L-atomic formulas, L-formulas, L-sentences and L-srrucures
@tranquil geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am alr?
yes.
you can also check to be sure
according to you, Cheryl is 18 now.
5 years ago she's 13, and in eight years she would be 26, exactly double that of her age 5 years ago
so yeah
Thx
anything else you wanna ask?
No, is all
alright, you may close the channel then. all the best!
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@vague rain Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vague rain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
Hm
What exactly do you need help with
A step by step analysis of the whole thing actually
To specify, the 4th last line
how do we arrive at 0 < x < pi/2
What's the theorem they are proving?
i suppose its part of the squeeze for lim sinx / x as x -> 0
okay, yeah, there is your answer
through the sandwich theorem
0 < |x| < pi/2 is in the assumption of that theorem
Yeah, the limit only cares about the values which are close to 0
Common sense
yeah
np, we sometimes miss the obvious
Closed by @sleek trellis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Source: Madhava Mathematics Competition
There is solution paper available. But I want to do this myself
By the way is it wasting your time?
I kind of thought it's fine
ok so i dont really know how to solve it
but maybe it relies on the fact that f attains all natural numbers
and g(a) and g(b) are distinct for all distinct a and b
Ahh
Ok
yep
Since f is one to one, it means that f(n) = 1 for some n in N.
Does that give a bit of a hint?
onto*
but yeah
ok i see
Does it mean surjective?
ok hint: ||use induction||
no, one to one = injective
but onto = surjective
One to one should be bijective
no injective is right
But still, since f is surjective, f(n) = 1 for some n in N
oneone onto is bijective?
one to one + onto = bijective, yes
using this, use ||induction|| to prove it for all n
i haven't looked at this. i hope that's fine
it's ok
but nico's hint is very powerful
ok
if f(n) = 1, what's g(n)
this problem is very nice 
Closed by @fresh grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thankyou @fleet willow @atomic bison
I really enjoyed the conversation
when you both helped me soo much
tysm
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help explain this to me
idk the way my teacher is explaining it is confusing me
how would you go about multiplying them
ye ik that
but i’m confused because im getting these crazy answers
You will come up with a large equation once you have finishing FOILing
show what you tried
Then, find common terms, and simplify
would it be 0.5x^2-1.3x+0.67x?
how did you arrive at this conclusion
foil
2x times 1/2x
1x^2
-1 times 1/2x
Easiest way to check is to pull up Desmos and see if you get the same curve
use parentheses around (11/6) but yes
Closed by @sour bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats the point of higher derivatives, like i just learned it and its so easy i just take derivative of a derivative etc. but i want to know what applications it might be used in in the future so can someone give me some insight thanks
One cool application is e.g. taylor series
You know how first derivative is used to find tangents?
yeah
What if insteand of a tangent line, we tried to make a tangent parabola? Or a tangent 3rd degree polynom, or a tangent 4th degree polynom...
it would approximate the function better and better
MathIsAlwaysRight
and the cool thing is, that if you take an "infinite degree" polynomial, also known as an infinite series, it actually becomes exactly the function (often for nice enough functions, sometimes it doesnt)
isnt that common sense though
Maybe, but it doesnt always work
For example do you think that the following is true:
If a function has all derivatives = 0 at x = 0 and f(0) = 0, then it's just f(x) = 0
yeah
it's not true
wait what


