#help-23
1 messages · Page 315 of 1
oh my god
sure
yea i think so
okay
yea
u didnt understand?
no issue
oh
yea
anything to the power of 1 is the same as it is
so
x³ = x × x²
and thus
x³ - x² = x × x² - x²
yes?
yeaa
x (x * x ² - x) ?
damn
yes
find smt commonly multiplied between those two terms
and get it out
in x×x² - x²
whats the commonly multiplied term?
x²
wdym
x²(x - 1)
where did you get the 1 from
oh
x² × x - x² × 1
say x² = a, x = b, 1 = c
it becomes ab - ac
ab - ac = a(b - c)
if u put back in the values u substituted
u get x²(x - 1)
okay
feels like u didnt understand
took me a while but i think i did
ok so
going back to ur old expression
x³ - x² + x - 1
that would be equal to x²(x - 1) + x - 1 yes?
weve js discussed it
I'm sorry bro
the factorisation of x³ - x²
aw
yes
if x³ - x² = x²(x - 1)
then substitute that in x³ - x² + x - 1
becomes x²(x - 1) + x - 1
no?
im starting to doubt your yes's
yes
no?
and factorise it?
I'm incapable
.
actually
shit
wait lemme try
bros literally me
(x-1) * (x²-1) ?
ALMOST
is it the x²
its not -1 in the second bracket
nuh uh
cause ab + ac = a(b + c)
ab - ac = a(b - c)
signs are a bit of a mess when it comes to factorising
no I'm the mess here 😭
thanks? 😭
I'm not being sarcastic
goodluck
i need it
dw uve got it
😭
@cunning zephyr Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cunning zephyr
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
honestly need help perfecting exponential functions
Ask your problem
well theres multiple
do one problem at a time
alright this one is where i dindt fully understand it from my teacher
one sec il send it
ok so it was
y = log3^x
If i recall correctly we leave the log behind and turn into exponenteal form?
So $y = \log(3^x)$
YakuBros
Right ?
I don't see what you mean by fonction table
Like you can get the power down
$\log(a^b) = b\cdot \log(a)$
YakuBros
What are you trying to do ?
wdym?
Good question
And?
and this table Helps us connect the numbers in the graph to how should i say it
hold on im gonna send u a ful method
$\log_3 ^x$
YakuBros
hmm?
Indeed you have that $\log_3(x)$ is the inverse of $3^x$
YakuBros
graph the function
Do a symetry wrt the y=x line
Once you have one of them
yeah i know thay
Do other people not use the function table?
@mortal aspen Has your question been resolved?
Well, there is no real pedagogy point to make students graph function imo, it will always be wierd, its just unsatisfying job and they learn nothing more except at least that inverses are symetric etc... imo ofc
I agree
Much easier to just think about the function like this
Based on a shape of simple functions
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok
@mortal aspen Has your question been resolved?
I can't see well
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i start solving b? If I need to find the angle of one of these how do I find it
find this angle first and then do cosine rule
How do I find that angle?
you know that angle and 130 are part of a co-interior angle so it adds up to 180 degrees
Closed by @green ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I came back
mila's comeback
Max = 56
Min = 0 (right??)
Amplitude = 28
I just wanna start off by making the equation for this question
I got:
y = -28cos(0.8pix) +28
How did you get this?
isnt it kinda like this
ok 28 is amplitude and its negative bc its flipped
p = 2pi/k
k = 2pi/2.5
(In particular, when time is 0, do you get the height as 0.5m above ground?
)
ur c value is not 28
yeah im confused then whats my max and minimum
is minimum 0.5
min is 0.5, max is 56, ur midline would be 0.5+56/2
but isnt the diameter 56 itself
You could get on and go underneath the height that you get on
so max is 56.5
nvm misread
oh ok so minimum is still 0
wait whats wrong in my equation

(assumedly so, I will say, it isn't entirely clear imo
)
so reall
@candid ocean 

Regardless, you want when time is zero, you get a height of 0.5m
If you're using x for time, then you get a height of 0 at time 0 
hm
wait so thats not right?
or wait
👩🦯
It isn't 
BRUHHH
56 + 0.5/2
why did the answer key show this then 
They really should at least say e.g. the minimum height you're at 
🥁
ugh
why - 50
ur base function is -28\cos\left(\frac{2\pi}{2.5}x\right)+28.5-50
but its asking when its above 50
$code$
i thought you were trying to use it
how does the command work
ziming is it u no way
put $ before and after
yes
no way man
hahaha
Closed by @candid ocean
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
💀
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @hasty mason
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Well I guess the question explains itself. I tried using shell method but I can't figure out x, no calculator allowed
this is homework so i graphed it anyways and now i'm not even sure you can use shell method
So you are given x = e^ycos(y)?
I see
and its prolly correct i graphed it seems to be right
What you got
i cant get it
to use shell method i need to determine upper bound of x
i can't
because that requires solving e^xcosx=pi
Let me write down what we have I am kinda confused
between $y = e^x \cos x$ and $x = 0$ around the $y$-axis from $y = 0$ to $y = \pi$
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
umm...lets look at the y graph i made which is essentially the same thing
yea send it
just the green part
lets just kinda say it is otherwise the is completely not solvable
ok
or just infinity making this question too easy
also are you supposed to get the upper bound algebraically
this volume is given by Integral (pi-y)2pixdx between x=0 and the upper bound
2 problems
one i cant get the upper bound
second if you take in y you'll find yourself intergrating xe^xcosx
which is prolly solvable but hard
washer method also exists
you can turn cos²(x) into (1+cos(2x))/2
and then you have e^(2x)
huh i dont see cos^2
R²
then you gotta find y=e^xcosx what is x in terms of y
and also still you need to find the intersect which is the upper bound
the first part is hard because e^x cosx is not one to one
,w N[e^xcos(x)=pi]
lmao can't even find first section how am i supposed to even consider more
I just find that problem pretty weird
well it seems the solutions are just pi-periodic
,, xe^x\cos(x) = xe^x \cdot \frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2} = \frac{x}{2} \cdot \left (e^{x(1+i)}+e^{x(1-i)} \right )
yes this also crossed my mind
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
lets just find the smallest positive x
well you found the numerical value
"no calc allowed"
lol
you must have a special teacher
,w Integrate[2pi * x * (pi - e^x * cos(x)), {x, 0, 4.739}]
@lament steeple Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lament steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm really confused how the first expression simplifies to the second one, i always get a (x-1)^3/2 when i try to simplify
$(x-1)^2 = |x-1| \cdot |x-1|$
If you bring one inside the sqrt, you get $$|x-1| \sqrt{(x-1)^2 \frac{x+1}{x-1}} = |x-1| \sqrt{(x-1)(x+1)} = |x-1| \sqrt{x^2 - 1}$$
Azyrashacorki
Ah i see
What about when i do it as $$(x-1)^2 = \sqrt{(x-1)^4}\sqrt{x+1} / \sqrt{x-1}$$ and simplify to get sqrt(x+1)(x-1) ^ 3/2
Tobbib
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
@flat blade Has your question been resolved?
@flat blade Has your question been resolved?
@flat blade Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @flat blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone walk me through this I'm horrible with graphs
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
a linear function and a piecewise function??
okay so like this is how my teacher taught it
she usually calls it a breaking point
she would set whatever is inside of the absolute value symbol equal to 0
and she does a number chart
like this @lean otter right
yeah vertex
after finding the vertex u just apply the signs from the sign chart to whatever is inside the absolute value symbols
so like
-(x-2) and (x+2)
wait
but
why
like
I don't understand, where do the signs come from and why are they important to the function
when u plug in any number left of 2 into x
u get negative
right of 2
u get positive
Oh yes
they’re considered important to the function bc ur just turning the absolute value function into a piece wise function
Oh okay I see
so yeah when u see an absolute value function just think of this
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i find how much solutions this has
@stark bear Has your question been resolved?
@stark bear Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey. Just wanted to check that the correct working out in this situation is to find the minimum value of faces not visible (15) and subtract this from the total possible value if all faces were visible(3*21 = 63) to get an answer of 48. Thanks in advance.
Closed by @magic vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where am i going wrong, the black is my first attempt pencil is second im supposed to get 2a - b = 4
@soft folio Has your question been resolved?
@soft folio Has your question been resolved?
,rotate
what's the original question?
ah you're just solving $k + \lambda k = 2k - \mu k$
south, just south
yeah i tried by getting mew and lambda in terms of a and b then subtituting it into that
great and then the other equations are:
$3 - \lambda = 4 + (1 - \lambda) a$
$-2 + 2 \lambda = 4 + (1 - \lambda) b$
I see now
south, just south
ah so $a = \frac{-1 - \lambda}{1 - \lambda}, b = \frac{-6 + 2 \lambda}{1 - \lambda}$
south, just south
now just compute 2a - b from this
im not following, do i multiply a in terms of lambda by 2 and b in terms of lambda by -1?
yes
if im subsituting something in for a and b how is my final answer gonna haev a and b
it won't
you just want to show 2a - b equals 4
buongiorno
hi?
okay so you want to replace a and b with lambda
not the other way around
oh then if i add 2 of a in lambda terms and -b in lambda terms ill get 4?
yes, you have to show your work for that step though
but yes the numerator and denominator cancel
oh okay, 1 thing tho why wouldnt it work if i were to replace lambda with a and b?
it just doesn't work; you're going in the wrong direction with those steps you wrote
.
hmmm okay
thansk for the help
no worries
don't feel bad that it didn't work out btw!
at least you came here to ask for help when you couldn't figure it out
yeah i kinda got a new way of thinking about questions like that, usually i just mindlessly do stuff and get the same equation it was weird that it didnt wrok out this time but ur method made more sense
yeah worked solutions also help a lot at times
alright type .close if you're done
Closed by @soft folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My thought process is to use induction followed by Vieta's formula, nevertheless I am still confused
descartes' rule of signs
That only identifies the number of roots though?
The number of positive / negative roots
There are 3 sign changes so there are 3 / 1 +ve roots?
Factorize?
couldn't you just find explicit expressions? $C_n = (-1)^{n-1}5^{2^n}$ for example
aeiou
sorry
C is always negative
Yeah C is always negative
yes
And C100 is just -5^2^99 but I don't think that helps
to get an idea, consider f_1(x) and maybe f_2(x)
this question is solved by factoring
So I factorize it with An, Bn and Cn in it?
knowing that your goal is to factor should be enough of hint
Do I use induction to prove that all of fn(x) can be factorized?
to prove a given factorization is valid yes induction is fine
though i would recommend actually finding the factorization before trying to prove it...
probably you know this. just saying though
Like finding the numerical values and stuff?
finding the factorization
yes ofc what else lol
Mb
but to do that it would be very wise to look at f_1 hence why this msg
looks like you already looked at f_1
should give you an idea on how to proceed
indeed
For some reason
How did you find out so quickly
Is there some sort of trick
Or technique
I'm missing out on
no, i just have calculator open when helping people. so when looking for these patterns it does not take too long
Oh ok
but for this (type of) problem, intuition is very important
So now I know fn(x) = (x-1)(x^2 ......)
playing around with problem before attempting it
Got it
Wait but
Don't I have to show mathematical proof that 1 is always a root
I can't just trial and error and then make this claim right
no
claim: f_n(x) = blah
proof of claim: etc
you don't need to motivate your claim, so long as your proof is correct
the idea is you find a general form for f_n(x) and prove that form is correct using induction
So do I substitute x=1 into the general fn(x)
And prove that it is 0
Ah
no
OH
I get what u mean now
So I claim fn(x) = (x-1)(x^2.....)
Is true
And then inductive step
?
When n = k+1
Oh yeah.
your goal is to prove that f_n(x) has 3 real distinct positive roots
& just proving f_n(x) = (x - 1)(x^2 ...) does not help you do this
Can't I just show the discriminant of the quadratic >0
Oh wait
It might also be x=1 as a root tho
Hence repeated
find the full factorization
Alr let me have a shot
fn(x) = (x-1)(x^2 -?x +5^2^(n-1))
Tryna figure out what ? is
-5, -15, -175 for the first 3 of f(x)
I think I need a small hint
note you might not be able to find a closed form expression for ?
everything given in the problem is defined recursively, so ? is also probably defined recursively
I don't think I can find the recursive expression...
Any hints
given the quadratic is in form (x^2 - d_n x - c_n), the d_n can be expressed in terms of d_{n - 1} and c_{n - 1}
Isn't c_n just 5^(2^(n-1))
I verified for the first 3
Of f(x)
Nvm they are the same thing
Question already gave recursive for c_n
I don't think I can find a d_n recursive with the numbers -5, -15 and -175 tho
I don't see a pattern in any way
also consider the values of c, which you have -5 and -25
Still don't see a relationship...
Do I need to use vieta's formula?
d_n = d_{n - 1}^2 + 2c_{n - 1}
Hm
for my equation
might not be the same for yours
could be plus or minus flipped somewhere
wtv, but the idea is there
Oh yeah you are right
Dude how are you so good bruh
Ok now that we have the general expression, I have to prove that quadratic has 2 distinct positie real roots that are not 1?
Wait
I can just use vieta's formula now
For the quadrati
Cuz their sum and product must both >0
Their product is -Cn, which is positive
@eternal carbon How do you prove d_n is always positive?
Help please
@eternal carbon Hello?
@regal violet Has your question been resolved?
Anybody help pls
@regal violet Has your question been resolved?
@regal violet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve part C?
@jaunty root Has your question been resolved?
yes i have done a and b
i dont know? this is all the information i was given
what does the footnote number 1 say
"The function S is called the entropy. That δQ/T is an exact differential (and not just for ideal gases) was
discovered by Clausius in 1867."
riemann
after dividing this by T and integrating, you should be able to write it as the integral of a single function instead of a sum of two functions
If I divide by T, I should have 1/Vdv+k/TdT?
yea integrate those separately then combine
derivative of a constant = 0
mm
true
so yeah we cant really get C then
so that would just be the answer to the question then?
The answer is the function S which you haven't shown yet
@jaunty root Has your question been resolved?
is this not S?
no
would it be the integral of this?
yes i did this. so if i integrate SQ/T I should get S right?
try it
It's essentially like an exact differential equation
write S here and show delta Q / T = dS
Johnn #❓how-to-get-help
im not sure i know what that is
dont mind
Why is this not S?
pain
i was wrong, i thought you had to integrate one more time
I am sorry
$\int \frac{\delta Q}{T} = \int dS = S$
riemann
Thanks @fathom jewel
ok, so this is my answer then?
yes
Closed by @jaunty root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i get sum help
@somber fern Has your question been resolved?
lines are usually in the form of y=mx+b, in which m is the slope of the line and b is the y-intercept (where the line crosses the y-axis)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone know where ive went wrong here
2x + 8x = 10x
just about to say that
Closed by @rain pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
f(x)=x^4-4x^2
smh i got it to 496 instead of 16
when f'(2)
😭
w
wrong process
yeah the thing did not work when onsertinf the *
its hidden discord thing
wait ima type what i did again looks messed up
power rule
f'(2)=4 * (2)^3 - 2*4(2)^1 dont mind the spaces
that gets you 16 doesnt it
emm 4*(2)^3 is 16? but the - makes it 0? please write it out i cant make it smh
-2 * 4(2)^1
-2*8
-16
??????
happens to the best of us
Closed by @round dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think I kinda get it, but I'm not sure. Why is 2.1% turned into 1.021?
2.1% is 0.021 in a decimal
Yeah, but the answer given to us was D. I don't get why. 🥲
since we are increasing, it is 100% + 2.1% = 102.1% = 1.021
think about the parent function of exponential growth
OHH OKAY. THAT MAKES SENSE! thank youuuu
oki
.close
Closed by @cedar lance
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yw
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the question basically asks which one of the options is true
I think either c or d
i'm pretty sure d) is true but i don't know for which values c) would be false
@proper nexus Has your question been resolved?
b and c i think
@proper nexus Has your question been resolved?
can't be b) because x^2 + x can't = something negative in R
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would it be fair to say in cases of common notation "n!!" is to be interpreted as "(n!)!" as opposed to a double factorial?
depensd on ur level of math lol
but typically, i dont think so
n!! is the double factorial, if a paper said (n!)! specifically, then read it as that
and vice versa
nobody interprets n!! as (n!)!
yeah, my friend was auguring with me about stupid notation things
Sometimes notation has interpretations, is not the case
Point of inquiry from someone who is ignorant to this: what's the difference?
well it is believable that one might interpret n!! as (n!)! if one were not aware of double factorials
but generally people in the know do not do this
i think they weren't
I meant correct interpretation
whether it's correct is another matter
one writes notation to their audience
if the audience is familiar with one thing, then that shall be the notation
6!! = 6*4*2 for example
one skips every second number
So it's factorial but only of same parity
yes
230 - 220 / 2
you may not believe it but this is equal to 5!
i believe it

Snow knew what was coming lol


@sacred ferry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
tried doing implicit differentiation, what did i do wrong?
unless i should instead be doing product rule
then quotient rule @jovial sentinel
the problem asks me to solve using implicit
i did 1 * y + x * 1 dy/dx
You're on the right track
so d/dx 4 = d/dx xy i think
You've differentiated the left side, now just need to differentiate right wrt x and then solve for y'
This channel is taken
Read #❓how-to-get-help
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Then open your own help channel and ask it
have i not already differentiated the left and the right?
m. frost
ok yes
Now just solve for dy/dx
$\frac{d}{dx}y = 1\frac{dy}{dx}$
m. frost
I just shorthanded it
That's what I got
what if instead of 1 it was 2?
yeah

Closed by @jovial sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
another question, i need to find the 2nd derivative d^2y/dx^2
of x^2+y^2=36
i got dy/dx = -x/y
so how would i get the 2nd derivative from here
Differentiate it again
differentiate -x/y?
Yes
Yes but the signs are not correct
It's not two minuses
-(-x)?
Yes
so -y+x(-x/y) / y^2
Closed by @jovial sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am trying to compute the total number of ways that teams can choose heroes in a Deadlock game. There are a total of 23 heroes. Each game consists of 12 heroes (where each team has 6 heroes). There can be no duplicate heroes in a game. What are all the possible ways you can pick heroes for a Deadlock game?
Combinatorics break my head
Apparently the answer is 23C12 * 12C6 / 2
I get that we have to divide by 2 to avoid double counting team symmetry
(Swapping teams represents the same game)
@viscid fulcrum Has your question been resolved?
@viscid fulcrum Has your question been resolved?
couldnt you just do 23C12, I dont think you are overcounting. You are picking a game of 12 heroes from a pool of 12.
theres many ways to do this
you can also just do 23C6 * 17C6
but to adjust for overcounting it devides by 2
since you consider swapping around team a and b as 2 different configurations
How did you get to this result?
first choose the first team
you choose 6 out of a pool of 23
then you choose the second team
Ah I see
then have 23-6 choices
And this doesn't accidentally pick a duplicate member?
it depends if you consider swapped teams
duplicates
if team a has (1, 2, 3) and team b has (4, 5 6), do you consider the same game composition but swapped teams as 2 games
then u would have to devide by 2
I meant that
Okay, we first choose 6 from 23. Then you have 17 left over to choose from, but how does this ensure that you don't include the same member in that 17?
Or is that already implied?
I guess it kind of makes sense... Somewhat tricky to think about
all good
.close
Closed by @viscid fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For sqrt[(z - a)(z - b)], why is the branch cut from a to b?
a, b are real numbers, and b > a
With z - a and z - b as above, if I write theta1 + 2npi and theta2 + 2mpi
Instead of just theta1 and theta2
The function value is $\sqrt{r_1r_2}\cdot e^\frac{i(\theta_1+\theta_2)}{2}\cdot e^{i(m+n)\pi}$
SilverSoldier
If I'm at a point to the right of b, I can still find m and n so that it is multivalued
Why don't I branch there?
@lapis shadow Has your question been resolved?
@<@&286206848099549185>
@lapis shadow Has your question been resolved?
Every point potentially multivalued. The issue is whether you can choose one of the values and preserve continuity.
@lapis shadow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @clever forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How is this possible?
This is how I have done this, I don't get what's wrong in my method
should be -1.3333…
missed a negative
but (-2)/(-1.5) = 1.333
row 3 should be 0 0 1 0
no the issue is that -1.5 + -1.5 * -1 = 0 right
but -2 + -1.5 * 0 = -2
Closed by @blissful flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Making the rectangles smaller and smaller would eventually give us points
And then we choose only those rectangles(points) which lie inside and on the boundary
which book is this
I get this
But
So matter how small we make the polar rectangles (which eventually give us arcs) we cant get the exact area
That's the problem
@lean otter what do you mean by you cant get the exact area?
@lean otter so u mean to tell that the polar rectangle's area becomes a curve and does not have an area?
@lean otter then what is your issue here?
Here for the first curve which touches g1(x(
We should be considering it right
@lean otter what do you mean?
Yes
So we sum up these arcs to get the area
But the sum of arcs always gives us a region like this
Assume the top is an arc of a circle
think of it this way, we are making the polar rectangles smaller and smaller but they never collapse to form an arc , they remain small polar rectangles, if they are small enough u can approximate these polar rectangles with small trapezoids , when we mean adding areas we mean that we add the areas of these small trapezoids
