#help-19
1 messages · Page 128 of 1
No. That's what the square brackets mean. If they mean that with angle brackets they're using nonstandard notation
[-1, 2.5] is the interval from -1 to 2.5 including -1 and 2.5.
(-1, 2.5) is the interval from -1 to 2.5 excluding -1 and 2.5.
[-1, 2.5) is the interval from -1 to 2.5 including -1 but excluding 2.5
👍 👆
generally it is denoted by ()
But in general the notation
f : A -> B says that f is a function which maps values from the set A into values from the set B.
You can replace A and B with any notation for a set
Right, and R there is most likely referring to the set of real numbers
Robert
What is the context that you saw these angle brackets?
For example definition of a differential of real function with one variable in point x=a€(c,d)
f: <c,d> -> R is differentiable in point (idk point translation ) x=a€<c,d> if there is a limit lim x->h
and so on
You're translating to english, yes?
from croatian
Okay I'm 95% sure then, given the context, that your source material means either [] or () when it writes <>. Probably () given that you've seen [] in the context but (I'm assuming) not ().
My best guess is that it's using:
<a,b> to be the interval from a to b excluding a and b.
ok
1st differential of a real function of 1 variable in point x=a€(c,d)
definition then below is answer
f:<c,d>->R is differentiable ...
Yes, I can tell you with certainty that <> must mean the exclusive interval (<a, b> means from a to b excluding a and b). Because that's what's necessary for the definition of the derivative,
<> is being used as a nonstandard notation for () here
Btw when you said this:
1st differential of a real function of 1 variable in point x=a€(c,d)
In English we would say "1st derivative of a real function...". The word differential in English means something related but different.
Great penmanship and notes btw 🙂
@faint charm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
hi
I am supposed to write w in coordinate form but I don't even know what coordinate form is
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
coordinate form is just (4,5) where we have an x and a y
given are vectors u and v
so we first need to get them in vector form
see I am already lost
explain it to me like I am five
I understand vectors have a direction
I know what coordinates are
but these are just coordinates I see, how can I determine direction from coordinates
$\vec u=\begin{pmatrix}2\3\end{pmatrix}$
u = (2, 3)
pixel
gimme a sec ill make it visual
thank you it is very much appreciated
I would like to be able to do this without visualisation later
The vector is assumed to go from (0, 0)?
yes
Is that how direction is detemrined?
Okay that makes sense
Now I know how to determine direction
so a point is basically the same as a vector
so if we want to add vector u and v
we first need to have them in vector form
(2,3) would be $\vec u=\begin{pmatrix}2\3\end{pmatrix}$
pixel
The right part is vector form?
yes
and to make it clear that it's a vector we add that arrow on top
Right
what would be the vector form of v then?
just name the elements you don't have to do it in latex like i did
yes sry i was trying to figure out the syntax by looking at what you did
take ur time
x would be on "top" and y would be on "bottom", so 1 on top, 2 on bottom?
correct
Okay
To add them, is it so simple that I literally just add the top part together
and the bottom part together
yes
seperately
So for the vector w it would be 3 on top and 5 on bottom?
yess
and now we need to go back to coordinate form right?
i believe that was the question
very good
nah you're good
If I instead multiplied the vector u with the vector w
we can't multiply vectors
Okay
there are certain operations
like dot product
and cross products
you'll learn that later
You say that but I am in Uni now
I should actually update my roles
I am cooked brother
I am still in denial
you're taking linear algebra?
well I started the 26th and
right now people are just being welcomed
and partying
I can tell I am way behind in the math department
Every department if I am being honest
I am 22 and there are so many 19 year olds who are just brilliant, they have taken more math courses than I have and all in succession
My education has been all over the place with many gaps between courses
I am just full of dread right now tbh
I am going over old tests from each math course to see what I am missing
I worry there are too many for me to learn before they become relevant
To answer your question, I will be taking linear algebra, at least I assume so
Anyway thank you, adding vectors and switching from coordinate to vector form shouldn't be a mystery anymore
.close
Closed by @dry orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the problem is to prove that
Is ?
sorry one sec lol
that
so i dont understand why this proof wouldnt work for any series sequence that converges to infinity?
why did they restrict m_n to only be whole numbers?
i get that but why is m_n restricted to only be whole numbers?
What
If you want to prove this you can use an approximation
this is a proof
i understand this proof
i just dont understand why it wouldnt work for any series that converges to infinity
What do you mean converge to infinity
its limit is (positive) infinitiy
If its limit is infinity the series doesn't converge to a finite value
i know
now then what will be the finite upper bound for the sum to infinity of the series
the sum?
oh
oops
sorry
my bad
anytime i said series i meant sequence
haha sorry english isnt my first lang
If a series is convergent and increasing it means that there exists M such that the nth partial sum is always less than M
But if the limit of the series approaches infinity then there is no M such that the nth partial sum ≤ M
Which means it is not convergent to begin with
whats a partial sum?
The sum of the First n terms of a series
i didnt get to that yet
again sorry if i confused you
i meant sequences not series
and when i say converges to infinity i mean the limit is infinity, not that it converges to a finite limit
the only thing im trying to understand is why that proof only works for a sequence thats only of whole numbers
If the limit L is infinity it is not convergent to begin with.
If the limit L is finite then it might be convergent
sure but some books use a different terminology that says "converge to infinity"
anyway thats not what im asking about
@opal temple Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @opal temple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I factored out x^2+x-90
That gave me (x+10)(x-9)
So X cannot be -10 nor 9
Did I do the notation wrong?
Left infinity needs to be negative :|
.close
Closed by @magic dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Chad just became his own helper damn
Good on you for recognizing that lmfao
i just had to graph it then my brain realized XD
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I need to prove that gcd(a,b)=gcd(|a|,|b|)
This is extremely intuitive but I can't find a way to prove it mathematically
What definition of gcd are you using?
Isn't this trivial
Since if a|-b implies a|b
If a,b are integers and they are not both zero, then the largest number in the set of common divisors of a and b is the gcd
Maybe you can see that x and -x always have the same set of divisors
Does that prove that their gcd are the same?
Good point - is that rigorous enough though?
It is rigorous if you prove it
Assume a and b have a gcd d
Then we have a = dx and b = dy where x and y are coprime
So - a = -dx and -b = -dy
So d|-a and d|-b
Giving -x and -y which are coprime so it must be there gcd
correct me if I said smthng stupid
How would you go about proving that? I can only think of a statement like if any pair of divisors of x is (a,b), there is also a pair (-a,-b) which also works and therefore if a is a divisor of x, so is -a
Yeah I think that works, thanks!
yw : )
a divides x means there is y such that ay=x. But then a(-y)=-x. So a divides -x too
Sorry for the space in the smile my autocorrect converts it into a smile emoji which I don't want
And the set of common divisors of x and y is the intersection of the set of divisors of x with the set of divisors of y
Right
@rustic sail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So we have $x^{-n}$ now
MetuMortis
So answer should be $-n*x^{-n-1}$
MetuMortis
brody is spilling the beans
Which is equal to $\frac{-n}{x^{-1*(-n-1)}}$
oh so ultimately you end up doing n+1
MetuMortis
Yup correct
bro is sigma or rather summation
stop doing that
No its
#help-19 message
Closed by @young sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Oh mb 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the one step subgroup test appropriate to show that H is a subgroup here? Sorry for the messy handwriting. I just want to make sure I understand this and what the one step test does (& where its needed). But since the determinant isn't equal to 0 I'm not really sure I need a one step?
The "one step" being showing that $a, b$ being in the "subgroup" implies that $ab^{-1}$ is in the subgroup?
@brittle beacon
Yeah, if we show ab^-1 then the subset is a subgroup
or closed under multiplication while showing the inverse of b exists in the set
I think?
I mean, you can use that to show anything is a subgroup really, that's a quicker way to show you have closure under the "larger group" operations (so as long as you're nonempty, you have the identity, and then are closed under inverses and multiplication)
ohh okay. Okay just wanted to confirm. I think I know whats going on. This is just a confusing subject for me 😭
So if it had specifically stated that xy =/ 0, then I could technically just show that it is closed under multiplication right?
to prove subgroup
I mean, at least in general, if you proved closure under multiplication, you'd still need to show that you contain inverses, which checking just closure under multiplication doesn't really do
As above, the "one step" does both for you provided you're nonempty
Okay I think I got it :) thank you very much

.close
Closed by @stable pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with this, i dont know what im supposed to do
i need to find the measure of each angle
exterior
to find the angles first do 180 - 9x + 12
then you will have all the interior angles
well the interior angle and 9x + 12 would be supplementary, so yeah 180 - (9x + 12) is the interior angle
so their sum would be 180 degree
you can find x from that
so for the interior angle next to the exterior one, it would be 192 - 9x?
itd be 168
-9x
oh
forgot the brackets
just sum up the angles and equate it to 180
now you have 3 interior angles
168 - 9x
6x + 3
4x - 3
their sum would be 180 degrees
so x + 168 = 180
triangle angle property
x = 12
got it, i was so confused for a second because i did 9x + 12 + 168 - 9x = 180
oh lol
Closed by @drifting pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This isn't necessarily help with a problem but can you guys who passed precalc give me some stuff I should study on, I'm in 10th grade and taking honors algebra 2 and precalculus at the same time but I have no knowledge of either and want to be prepared for precalculus, can anybody give me a video or parts of precalculus I need to study on
aops book might be goodd
I wish but I got it tommorow 😔
What's the first part of precalc that you had to do, I'll probably get it to
@boreal jewel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@signal oar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did I properly setup desmos for graphing this limit?
sorry, my head isnt designed to turn as much as 90 degrees
Sorry about that. Here is the question rotated.
its ok
i think youre supposed to (just) substitute the values of x into the equation?
Yeah that’s what I’m trying to do here
if thats the case i think youre going on the right track
I wanted to do it on a graph though I was not sure I did it correctly on Desmos
Is how I imputed the values correct to outputting the correct values of the limit on Desmos?
Yes those are correct
Ok sick, I was pretty sure but wanted to double check I did not make any silly mistakes. Also I’ve not been able to find it but does Desmos have a builtin limit function instead of having to handle it like how I am?
I don't think it does, but it's not too hard to just plug in numbers very close to 0 or whatever
Yeah that’s fair
The table they gave you is a little misleading. It makes it look like you're going to always get -1 for negative values of x, and 1 for positive values for x
but that's not actually the case
not that it probably matters for this question
Yeah I know there is actually two tables the other gives wildly different values than the second I show here.
oh okay, that makes sense
Closed by @potent jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np 👍
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @elder vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
please stop opening channels with things completely unrelated to math.
I noticed it, so I close it immediately
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
So I am in the 8th grade
I need help with algebra 1
Or at least practice
We are currently on Solving Multi-Step Equations and Inequalities
I just need a good site of place to find practice that I can print our
the harder it is the better or more I prefer it
Thank You!
by "nulti"-step equations do you mean multi-step equations
yes sorry for the misunderstanding
its ok
do you mean simultaneous equations
like equations in a system
like 2 equations being system-ed together
and you need to solve them
Something similar
ah those
but it is only 1 equation
oh
i think you can go to some websites like studocu and course hero et cetera
and in the search bar just type what you need
something like -4l + 2(5k - 6) = -3k - 39
oh these
@vagrant talon i found a bit of these on the internet and they are printable pdfs with answers
oh thank you
hope they help
I appreciate it
yw
god bless
my pleasure
remember to close the channel if you have no more enquiries at the moment
oh okay
btw how do I close the channel
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help with KT conditions
for maximisation with inequality constraints
Lambda >=0
but minis
minimisation is the same, or lambda <=0?
because i have these solutions
which satisfy the Kuhn Tucker
BUT, the solution set says its wrong
and somehow my tightness assumption is wrong
@mystic saffron Has your question been resolved?
What "solution" is this sentence
And how does it differ from this sentence
the solution i calculated
is x* = 1.12
y*=1.16
near the bottom of the page
and the correct solutions from the textbook is x=1 y=1
sorry yes
was given
and the objective function is concave and the constraint is quasiconvex. (for extra info)
@mystic saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What does f approach when x approaches 4 from the negative side
What does g approach
Hence what does the sum approach
well x -> 4- so i start from the left make my way toward the right it would be (4,3) right?
and g being (4,20)?
@pale breach Has your question been resolved?
23
@pale breach Has your question been resolved?
wait what about 23
@pale breach Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\frac{(1+i)(1+i)}{(1-i)(1+i)} = i \ \
r = 1 \
\theta = tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{0})$
pixel
have i done anything wrong
no
just the division by 0 thing is not good
use limits to be more clear
but that's what its supposed to be, no?
wdym
Closed by @cunning dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
solution is 12i-3j+32k?
ok u know cross and dot product well right?
Scalar triple product
Vector •Vector = Scalar
So that can't be solution
Tru
@timber socket Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help, so 1st img is the original question and 2nd img is how me and my tutor solved it yesterday, and last img is how i solved it again today jsut to review the rule. anyway
my question is about the -2, why is it that in the 2nd img when me and my tutor solved it, the - went to -3n? where should the minus go? should it go to 3n or 2?
also my 2nd question is that at the end of our solving (the 2nd image) why did he make it so that it was + there?
thats why when i write my solving again, im asking how/why is it +? how do you know to change it to plus? we are dividing right? so it should be minus
<@&286206848099549185>
negative × negative is positive, right?
yeah thats true in that case, but im also asking about theeee
1st pic here
same thing shouldnt apply since the numerators at the top are both positive its the denominators that are positive x negative
it was -3 before btw he just changed it to +
$$ 1/-2 = -1/2, right? So if you have -(1/-2), it would be -(-1/2) = +1/2 $$
Blue Gaming
ok wait i get the 2nd half that youre saying i know that two negatives make a positive, but howd the - from the -2 go to -1 or are you saying it looks like this
In the exponent it is on the 2, right?
since where the minus is would change the answer of the question completely
yeah its on the 2 in the original question
but when me and my tutor solved it yesterday (i didnt notice i forgot to put -) he put - on the 3n
He also does not have the -2 on the exponent?
im not sure what you mean
exponent is the power i know that but why would the power need it?
I mean this
huh im not too sure about that actually but he treated it as -3n during our meeting
actually
hold on
so
in that part
the exponent, it gets flipped (idk the rule is just like that)
so instead of -2 would it become -3n then?
huh but that doesnt explain the outside exponent
It looks like that's what your tutor did
the n^4*2/-3n
yeah we were in a bit of a rush since it was the end of the lesson, but my main question is what would be the correct way to write it now
Assuming your tutor got it right (it looks like it), you should put the - on the 3n like your tutor.
hmm, okay
is it due to that flip flopping thing then ?
and then it stays like that
since either way whatevers inside that bracket becomes e and then only the outside exponents are what matters
I haven't got the part about e myself, so I don't know whether that's true.
ah its some kind of rule like
wait
something like this
oh wait
yeah this one was the one i was taught yesterday
I'll have to leave for class now, but to conclude I think you should put it on the 3n like your tutor.
ah sorry about that then, goodbye
@scenic quiver Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @scenic quiver
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@tawny notch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
someone help me im confused
You know that cos(a) = -21/29 and sin(a) = 20/29
try connecting p to the y axis
wait so is x=cos and y=sin?
is that a rule?
On the unit circle
tbh here they dont teach much about this unit circle where im from
Dommage, its cool
Many things to do with unit circle
So what about tan ? @paper moth
sin/cos
What do you think about this .
help me bro
i have a test tmrw on trig functions, trig identities, unit circle and two way tables
move 1 to other side??😭
There is only one trick to know here
ik there is formulas for this but i dunno what one to use
Let u = sin(x)
u?
Yeah
what is u
yeah do y
is it not literally just the x and y coords as your solution lol
then tan is just sin / cos
yeah th
2 sin^2 x -3y +1
so what are you tryna do
= ?
$\sin^2(x) = (\sin(x))^2$
YakuBros
Do you see it ?
So what does it gives now ?
You put sin(x) instead of y for each of the equations and solve thoses separetely
I'm sorry I don't get it
You have y = 1 and y=1/2
But you have to solve for x, knowing that y = sin(x)
So you replace
It gives sin(x) = 1 on first hand, and on second hand you have sin(x) = 1/2
???
No
Sin(x) isin't a multiplication
Its a function
Sinus of x
So you use the method to solve trig equations
Sin(x) = sin(a) <=> x = a +2npi or x = (pi-a) +2npi
nope
periodic?
oh ok
but what is 2npi
Bro
Where did u go?
bro thanks for the help appreciate it
imma just leave
.close
Closed by @paper moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I advice you to read some courses about trig functions and how to solve the teig equations
can you send me one please
Go check on khan academy thats free and well explained
just send the link bro please with the specific course
🙏
ok tysm
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, i need some help on this one !
So my idea is C2+iS2 so I can get exponantuol form
Already did this but its just awful lol
I think you cannot do much with sum of exponentials
Mhhh, I thought about a geometric « suite » (idk the English word)
ooh right
Then i return to a trigonometric form of my complexe, then i split it to have the reel part and the imaginary one, but maybe there is like a better way to do it
what are you exactly supposed to find?
I jsut need to calculate it
yep
C2 and S2 separately yes
okok
I got an anserw but maybe there are other ways of thinking idk
there's a formula for the sum of cosines and sines with their angles being in an Arithmetic progression
are you aware of it?
cos(a+b) exetera ?
ok so tell me more
oh, i wasnt aware of that
here we have an Arithmetic progression too
so we can use the similar derivation like this
btw, it is derived by some telescoping method
oh, its way simpler indeed, ill try to get like a pdf on this in french so i can understand it better
thx !
.close
Closed by @honest sluice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im facing a problem when i try to solve through my calculator it keeps saying syntax error
What is the thing you're putting into your calculator?
an equation even though i did it on a online calc it worked there but on my physical calc it keeps saying syntax error
lmao who uses calculator
what was the input for the syntax error?
Wdym
i mean what did you type that the syntax error came
I sent it
.
What do u mean
There’s better calcs
are*
Our professor asked for a scientific one so i bought this
Fair enough
Idk what to get
There’s a rlly good one i forgot the name but it’s expensive
Ugh if I can fix this I wouldn’t need to buy a new one but it’s annoying me
Cas calcs are actual menaces
I literally bought it yesterday everything works but some equations keep erroring
try different methods to solve this issue
Even teachers hate them
Ok
They malfunction a lot
It’s first time this has happened to me that’s why I’m confused
congratulations at mastering the art of stating the obvious!
Yes I have no personality
I think I should get myself a pfp
Omg bro I need help how can I fix this YouTube cant help me
Maybe
that way people would instantly assume I have a personality
Oh shit
The professor said to depend on it so easier for me 🤣🤣
I meant -2 not 2
I’m literally bad at math
I mean spammer
Im aware ._.
How did you get this role?
Fixed it
?
I spam invited for an inv contest and discord flagged me
Now people will treat you with disdain and contempt
I emailed discord to fix it and they said they wld but clearly they never did
Happens on the daily
;-;
Closed by @bitter robin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Yea
Or just learn algebra baha
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Lost in question 3, need help
.close
Closed by @desert drum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for lim x -> pi/6 cot(x), y is the limit sqrt(3) and not sqrt(3)/2?
cot(pi/6) is sqrt3
you may be confusing cot with cos
Closed by @brazen raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Well you need to find ur x and y intercepts, turning point and then graph
why are you a likely spammer 😭
Atp i shld put the story in my bio to stop ppl from asking
I spam invited for an inv contest, discord flagged me as a spammer
damn
@solar cave Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This might seem a stupid question, but how do i do this?
what are the red brackets for?
Err the problem
(2x+3)^2= 4x^2 + 12x+ 9
then we multiply that by 5
so it becomes 20x^2+ 60x+45
i think this is what u need?
or am i wrong?
Yeah, excuse me, where does the 12x came from?
2 multiplied by the 2 x then muplited by 3
so 2 .2x.3 that equals 12x
Ohhhhhhh
a is the 2x and the b is 3
is everything understandable?
Yup
glad to help
.close
Closed by @indigo zinc
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
How do i do this?
what does the questiuon want
To simplify ig?
i mean u simplify it then what?
u can leavce it like that
Oh sweet
it wont make a difference
Closed by @indigo zinc
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given f(x,y)=(O+Xx+Yy-Q) squared find (P,Q) where P subscript x equals Q subscript y equals gradient of f(x,y), find gradient f(x,y) and (P,Q). f(x,y) is for one dimension. Each dimension has its own constants. All but x and y are constant. I can make f(x,y) be more than one dimension added, plus+, together if needed. X E.
https://www.whitman.edu/mathematics/calculus_online/section16.03.html A source for this. X E.
Can you elaborate on your question more. The formulas you've provided don't make sense for the question.
I don't know Latex, [O is Origin of 2d in 3d, X is x direction vector in 3d, Y is like X for y, and Q is a point in 3d] That in [] is for one dimension only, like Oz, Xz etc. What is unclear? X E.
derivative of P for x is equal to derivative of Q for y and either of those is equal to gradient of f(x,y). X E.
Like Px=Qy=Grad f(x,y). X E.
Like I have (Ox,Oy,Oz), X, Y and Q like that and in each dimension sub in for only one dimension like [Ox,Xx,Yx,Qx]. X E.
@soft terrace have I elaborated enough?
Thus in total this is to be applied to a planar polygon finding average of all distances from a point to polygon parts, it returns distance squared when applied to a whole polygon. X E.
P and Q are functions of x and y so there is P(x,y) and Q(x,y). X E.
Anyway, it all comes down to find gradient f(x,y). X E.
Well this seems simple but maybe it isn't, any <@&286206848099549185> got an answer?
@errant vapor Has your question been resolved?
Please tell me if I need to explain better. X E.
@errant vapor Has your question been resolved?
Can someone say why I am getting nothing here?
I guess ping me if there is a solution. X E.
https://zzzcode.ai/answer-question?id=be35267a-d8a1-4e1f-afb6-210111ce0867 Easy solution, anyone want to check this?
Use artificial intelligence to ask any coding question online. Ask questions in any programming language and receive answers in your preferred spoken language.
And yes I know, no A.I. but this is to like my own thing. X E.
It says partial derivative of f over partial derivative of x is M. f over y like that for N. Results being 2X(O+Xx+Yy-Q) and 2Y(O+Xx+Yy-Q), is that correct? X E.
.close
Closed by @errant vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello guys, is there a difference between
$\lim \limits_{n \to \infty} \sum^n_{k=1} a_k$ and $\sum^\infty_{n=1} a_n$?
Akkaman
The limit.
Yes.
It's a series but I'm unsure if both mean the same or if there is a difference.
The latter is defined by the former
What do you mean?
So it pretty much means the same?
As in, $\sum_{k = 1}^\infty a_k$ is \emph{defined as} $\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{k = 1}^n a_k$, they mean the same
@brittle beacon
So it has nothing to do with the convergence of $a_k$, right? ^^
Akkaman
they are the same, so they either both converge or both diverge
Closed by @paper cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.(well, ignoring e.g. that if a_k doesn't converge to zero then there's no way the series converges, not really)
Thank you. 🙂
.close
Closed by @paper cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Show that the span of any non-empty subset is a vector subspace. I do not know how to start this
you have the definition of a span?
I do not actually, my lecture did not define that today
Yeah I do have the upcoming notes!
otherwise we can go with the wikipedia definition
And what it seemed is that the span was kind of like, a basis times your vector spaces coordinates?
It doesnt do a good job at explaining it, it just shows an example lol
this is something that will depend heavily on how you define a span. because you can quite literally define it as the smallest subspace containing your set, so by that def it is automatically a subspace
it's the "smallest" vector subspace that contains all the vectors of the input set is what I like to imagine the most
So would a span be like, the set of all vectors that come from some sort of linear combination?
The span of a set of vectors is the set of all vectors that can be made with those original vectors
you just take the input vectors and add and combine the however you like to
So if I have like, two vectors v and w, the span would just be A_1 v + A_2 w where A_1 and A_2 are both real numbers?
Yup! It would be the set of all vectors of the form A_1 v + A_2 w
If you have a vector space that contains v and w, it is obvious that every vector of the form you outlined must belong to that vector space because the operations must be well-defined
What's not obvious is that the set of vectors of the form you outlined forms a vector space, but it does
So the linear combination of V and W form a vector space?
this is the general definition according to wikipedia \
$span(S) = {\sum_{i=1}^k \lambda_i v_i: k \in \mathbb{N}, v_i \in S, \lambda_i \in K}$
really just all the possible linear combinations of the input vectors
rbit
Alright so its literally just adding all the possible vectors scaled by some arbitrary scalar?
Pretty much!
Well where each vector has its own scalar value
also this is a super funny coincidence but this is what I'm writing for my thesis rn 😂
Any vector that can be made with the input vectors
also one important note is that you can also input infinite sets, but all linear combinations have to be of finitely many vectors
Like, (0 0 1) isn't in span{(1 0 0), (0 1 0)} but (5 2 0) and (4 111 0) are
so the linear combination doesnt have to make use of all vectors
Huh that's really interesting! I appreciate the help on defining a span lol this makes a lot more sense
Yup, the scalar multiple of some of them can be 0
also you said non-empty set, but the span of an empty set is just the null space, which is a subspace too
So then my question is that I would have to show that the span of some non-empty subset is a vector space right? So I would I just use some arbitrary vectors to show that it outputs some sort of basis?
Like take A_1 v + A_2 w = e_1? or something like that?
you go by the definition of a vector subspace
Do you have a list of axioms you need to satisfy for a set to be a vector space?
Yes! There has to be a defined scalar multiplication and Vector addition right?
With the identitive axiom and the distributive and ssociative property as well?
Yup that sounds right
Okay so the subspace has to follow all of those axioms as well yes?
Yup, though you might have a shorter list of axioms you need to check for the subspace
you have the 3 properties that define a subspace, somewhere in your notes?
Like, if you start with a vector space you already know you have associativity, so there's no need to check with the subspace right?
I do not sorry, I was sick for that lecture and no one was willing to send me any notes
There might be something in your textbook?
damn
but if I were guessing, it would probably be like, theres closure under addition and closure under scalar multiplication
lol I got those two right
If you're using "Linear Algebra Done Right" then this is on page 18
I remember hearing something about closure lol
Would you reccomend that as a textbook for linear alg?
It's a good textbook for abstract linear algebra, though maybe not for more applied linear algebra
I'm in this weird scholars section of Calculus 3 which starts off with a course in linear algebra, then goes to Calc 3, then to Diff Eq's
doesn't it need to be closed under negation to or am I missing something
or wait scalar -1 of course
Yeah I was about to say
Okay so, we have a defined vector space and subspace right?
Would we just have to show that hey, A_1 v + A_2 w = some basis which is a subspace of the vector space?
Yeah you should be starting with a vector space, and taking the span of some of the vectors
Hmm, that would probably work but idk if it's the answer your prof would be looking for
I just wanted to get started with the question
I am going in to ask him tomorrow but I wanted to try to get a frame work for it
Do you have a textbook for that class? If so I'd recommend looking through it to find how subspace is defined there
Well I think if you're feeling alright about how span works then you shouldn't have too much of an issue
And I think I understand what you guys are saying, then I can definately use my textbook to more rigorously answer the question
I think I was just missing the information as to what I needed to know to answer the question from the beginning! So thank you so much!
I hope you have a great rest of your day @odd veldt !
Yeah you too man!
.close
Closed by @stone blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello guys, how do I prove that $\sum^\infty_{n=0} \frac{1}{(n+x)^2}$ is convergent for $0 < x \leq \frac{1}{2}$? I can use that $\sum^\infty_{n=0} \frac{1}{(n+\frac{1}{2})^2}$ and $\sum^\infty_{n=1} \frac{1}{n^2}$ are convergent.
Akkaman
What do you know about series convergence, and how you can show/disprove convergence?
I only know the monotone convergence theorem tbh.
index shift n -> n-1 and you get a majorant just like yesterday
I tried that but the problem is that I can't "mathematically correct" show an inequality that $\sum^\infty_{n=0} \frac{1}{(n+x)^2}$ is bounded.
Akkaman
although, no, no index shift it already is
do you know how if a_n and b_n are sequences, then
$a_n \leq b_n \Longrightarrow \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n \leq \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n$
Suppose $u_n$ is the partial sum of $\sum^N_{n=0} \frac{1}{(n+x)^2}$, then saying
$\sum^N_{n=0} \frac{1}{(n+x)^2} \leq \sum^N_{n=1} \frac{1}{n^2}$ would be wrong.
rbit
No.
what about $\sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{(n+x)^2} \leq \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n^2}$, why would that be wrong? Like the inequality itself?
rbit
It would be correct for n = 1 but wrong if the left one has index n = 0.
That is my problem.
Akkaman
yeah, but if it's bounded for n=1, then it's also bounded for n=0 (just take the bound for the n=1 case and add the very first summand of n=0 to it)
How do I write that correctly? As an inequality?
$\sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{(n+x)^2} \leq \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n^2} \leq \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} = L$ I would start with this
rbit
you get $\sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{(n+x)^2} \leq L$ and adding $1/x^2$ on both sides we arrive at $\sum_{n=0}^N \frac{1}{(n+x)^2} \leq L + \frac{1}{x^2}$
And let's say x = 1/10, then the very first summand of n=0 would be 100 and since $1/n^2$ converges to $\frac{\pi^2}{6}$, how does that work?
Akkaman
then the bound becomes pi²/6 + 100
rbit
our bound is allowed to depend on x, that doesn't matter for its convergence
That is actually very smart.
as we let x be a constant and then analyze the convergence
Yeah I think that should work.