#help-17
1 messages Β· Page 63 of 1
yep
Hello!
where are you stuck? π€
notice that |T2| = |T1|
since the pulley is smooth, and it's in rest
yes, right?
then it is solved
you have the module, and the direction
Closed by @midnight nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help
.close
Closed by @sharp lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Can i ask can somebody help me to multiply in like box form
just ask gurl
i can only help you if you will tell me what the question is?
what is a box form? lol
idk
like addition but like one number is on top and the other is on the bottom
but this is multipacation
did i spell that right lol
ya
okay so, whers the problem?
yeah but what step?
nothing
7 x 4?
7 x 5
which will be 35. you will write 5 on your paper and carry 3 on 4
@drowsy solar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understand why adding the vectors ortogonally results in a vector of magnitude 1 5 
I understand parallel = add
anti-parallel = subtract
but what is orthogonal
The easiest way to form a vector with magnitude 1 is to have them in the anti-parallel fashion
Yeah
I meant magnitude 5 sorry
If you have them orthogonally then you can use the pythagorean theorem to figure out the length of the sum vector
and note that 3, 4, 5 is a pythagorean triple
OOoo
I see
so the two vectors would be two sides of a triangle
Thank you
.close
Closed by @torpid horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i tried the hint but then everything just cancelled out when i subbed in z in terms of x and y
x+y+z = 12
minimize x^2+y^2+z^2
then z = 12-x-y
so then you have to minimize x^2+y^2+(12-x-y)^2
oh wait so are you saying to use the two constraints
so use the sum to get z
then use that to make it a function of two variables in the squares formula
@narrow latch Has your question been resolved?
i got an answer which is a minimum point
but when i subbed back in the point values to everything in terms of z, I got a sum that didn't make sense
@narrow latch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @narrow latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
1
you don't know what those words mean?
all i know is domain and range
okay so why can't you begin on (i)
negative infinity to negative two, negative two to infinity on domain
negative infinity to positive two, positive two to infinity on range
idk intercepts and that other stuff
write it in different notation than that
write it in interval notation
worded, we can't tell if you mean open or closed intervals
x-intercepts are where something crosses the x-axis
y-intercepts are where something crosses the y-axis
(ββ,β2) (β2,β) domain
^
yes
what bout asymptotes and intervals
you tell me
idk
then google what those words mean
Interval is (-1, 9] for example or (-inf, - 32]U(8, +inf) could be anything
To find intervals where it increases/decreases you need to find the derivative of the function and see where that 'new' function is positive and where it's negative. Positive means it increases, negative decreases.
Vertical asymptote are usually x = a, where a is usually a critical point in the domain, aka a point where the function is not defined. If lim_x->aΒ± f(x) = Β± inf then a is a vertical axis In other words, if f(x) for values a little greater or smaller approaches Β±inf then it is a vertical axis.
Horizontal asymptotes y = b are when no matter how large or small x is (Β±inf) f(x) will never reach b
Idk if this is making any sense but yeah
@obsidian viper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
β
Horizontal is 2
Vertical is -2
As X increases Y decreases
Univserally
right
@golden sierra ?
so how would i write that? normalyy
X belonging (-inf, - 2)U(-2, +inf) f(x) arrow pointing upwards
Downwards sorry
Idk I just write a bunch of arrows and stuff and professors are fine with it
@obsidian viper Has your question been resolved?
@obsidian viper Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @obsidian viper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the probability that a poker hand contains a full house?
So I have never played poker so I want someone to correct my idea of the game 
You can only have a hand of 5 cards at once, where the order matters
And a full house is when you have 3 cards of the same type and 2 from another?
Note that order does not matter in your hand, you can rearrange it
Wait how many total cards are ghere
This is a lie, there are 54 cards, you forgot the two jokers
9 times out of 10, if someone is talking about poker, they mean Texas hold 'em, which gives you 7 cards and you take the best 5 to make your actual hand
Hmm
But the hands you can make are the same
I think the full house calculation is straightforward, but just remember for the other poker hands, it can be a bit more complicated. When counting pairs, do not count 2-pair, etc.
its exactly this. 3 same rank, 2 another same rank
So the number of hands containing a full house is [
\map P{13, 2} \cdot \map C{4,3} \cdot \map C{4,2}
]
I suppose?
Permutations
13!/11! Yeah
I think I concur with your calculation...
,w number of full house hands
3744
wanna check it 
Wait wait the logic doesn't quite make sense I just splurged out the math
,calc 13 * 12 * 4 * 6
Result:
3744
your math is correct tho lmao
but yeah go on, what do u think doesnt make sense
When I say the "same type"
Does this mean just like the same suite?
Like 3 spades and 2 hearts
Okay
Do they need to have the same suite
they cant
Not possible
Oh okay
So like
I think it makes sense now
P(13,2) we are picking the two ranks and ordering them
Order matters
Well the order of the hand after being put down matters from what I read
Yes
Oh wait like
Oh yeah
We are counting the number of full house hands
order does not matter with regards to this
Which one has 3 and which one has 2
bruh
i was asking for a reaason >.>
Basically imagine we split the deck into their respective 4 card valyes
cmon, lex can figure
Oh ok
Let's say we pick 9 and Q. That is 13 choose 2.
Yeppie
With regards to the full house hand, why are there '2 possibilities'
after choosing 9 and Q
(this has nothing to do with suits at this point)
no that doesnt matter.
whether my hand is 99q9q or q9q99
its still a full house
(and the 3744 calculation counts it the same if its just a reordering of the 5 cards)
Yeah I'm a bit lost on what makes it an ordering then
The order of the cards in my hand dont matter
However, there is something to choose
Remember what a full house is:
3 cards of the same rank
2 cards of the same rank (different from above)
I guess you're "right" but like
π theres something explicit to describe
Q and 9 are your ranks but...
Oh hmm I guess like
You could have
(QQQ)(22)
But equivalently you could have
(222)(QQ)
yessss
Is this the idea maybe?
You are choosing which is the 3
and which is the 2
Thats why its P(13, 2) not C(13, 2)
Alternatively, you could write 2! . C(13, 2) . C(4, 3) . C(4, 2)
Wait I get that, but can we talk about why choosing it wouldn't exactly work?
?
it could work if u do this
- Choose 2 ranks.
C(13, 2) - Choose order for your 2 ranks. First will be 3 cards, other will be 2 cards.
2! - Choose suits for 3 cards.
C(4, 3) - Choose suits for 2 cards.
C(4, 2)
These are our 4 steps to creating a full house hand.
Convince yourself each step is independent to each other.
tbh this wording is a little poor
best we make it 3 steps
- Choose 3 card rank. Choose 2 card rank.
P(13, 2) - Choose suits for 3 cards.
C(4, 3) - Choose suits for 2 cards.
C(4, 2)
The order matters in the sense that you have to account for both kind of order you get similar to here
Back to the original question
This is the number of full house hands
I don't understand this part
actually
Why do you say the order matters - is that part of your question sheet
Nah I was just confirming what I thought was the case for how this stuff works
no, order does not matter
Q9Q9Q is still a full house
and we consider it to be the 'same' full house if its just the same cards
===
So compute the probability (I'll leave that to u)
Then as a follow up question you should compute the number of 2-pair hands 
which is harder
Hmm okay 
Also discrete probability just seems like PNC but extra
Okay well
P(13,3) from the get go of course
Wtf
C(13, 3)
then you need to think a bit
I like when the logic I have been trying to build for the last 15 minutes completely collapses

you see, in the first one u had 3 cards and 2 cards
but here we have 2 cards, 2 cards, 1 card.
3! ways doesnt cut it.
So let's rationalise this
Okay let's just
Make this analogue to a string because life becomes easier that way
You have 5 positions to fill
Two of the positions need to be a certain kind, two of the other another certain kind, and the last another kind
You have a set of 13 to choose from
Hmm
So immediately choosing them alone would be C(13,2)*C(13,2)?
thonk what
Wait I'm confusing things
Rewind
Rewind
So you have three positions to fill
Consisting of what kinds you choose (the amount of cards doesn't matter yet)
ranks π
i lit cant tell what qp2 means
but then order would matter
all 3! orders
do you want it to?
Rather - if order matters, I would think about it later.
You need to choose 3 ranks from 13.
I would say - unless you know order matters, assume it doesnt (as we progress)
im going to sidetrack for one moment
for the full house
if order mattered in your hand
you just multiply by 5!
does that make sense?
you can shuffle at the end, which is 5! possibilities
Yes I mean [
P(n,p) = C(n,p)*P(p,p)
]
Wait
Do we divide this by 3!?
2-pair:
- hand has 3 different ranks, and 2 of them appear twice.
XX YY Z
================================== - Choose 3 ranks.
C(13, 3) - .
- Assign suits.
C(4,2)*C(4,2)*C(4,1)
Sorry came back
Had something
But
Okay so
It's first C(13,3) then you have to assign the suite for each?
So like
C(13,3)*C(4,2)*C(4,2)*C(4,1)
I'd imagine
π
youre missing one thing that was done here
Choose the order
The hard part

Okay
Let's rationalise this
Hmm
Craaazy thought @crimson jetty
But wouldn't it be craaaaazy cool if we multiplied it by 8
wuld that work

wtf does 8 even mean
You need to choose which is which
XX YY Z
Yeah there are 6
im claiming some are the same...

There you go
Wot 
youre missing some
and uve counted some multiple times
Oh I see my mistake lmao
list them the same way as me
YY ZZ X
XX YY Z
ZZ XX Y
YY XX Z
XX ZZ Y
ZZ YY X
ok
I also ordered them this way... for reasons
XX YY Z
YY XX Z
XX ZZ Y
ZZ XX Y
YY ZZ X
ZZ YY X
But yeah, which ones are the same . . .
You get it
its because we cant distinguish between the pairs
all we care about is which rank is assigned the single card
,w number of 2 pair hands
123552 hopefully
so you happy its x3?
2-pair:
- hand has 3 different ranks, and 2 of them appear twice.
XX YY Z
================================== - Choose 3 ranks.
C(13, 3) - Choose which rank is single.
3 - Assign suits.
C(4,2)*C(4,2)*C(4,1)
==================================
,w (13 choose 3) * 3 * 6 * 6 * 4
XX YY Z
YY XX Z
XX ZZ Y
ZZ XX Y
YY ZZ X
ZZ YY X
=====================
XX YY Z = YY XX Z
XX ZZ Y = ZZ XX Y
YY ZZ X = ZZ YY X
=====================
YY ZZ X
XX ZZ Y
XX YY Z
=====================
X = 2, Y = 8, Z = Q
22 88 Q
22 QQ 8
QQ 88 2
=====================
These are the 3 different 'kinds' of 2 pair you can have with 2, 8, Q, not caring about suit.
you choose which rank goes in the single card.
The other 2 ranks are pairs.

Well I gtg, so I'll leave you with an exercise if you want:
3 of a kind:
- 3 ranks. 3 cards same rank, other 2 are different.
XXX Y Z
Ohh I see 

Man probability wild
combinatorics.
But Ty I think I get it now 
Just gonna speedrun some more stuff but it should be about it
.close
Closed by @warm widget
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, could somebody outline the general steps to my attached question? I know I have to implicitly differentiate and use the point-slope formula, just not sure exactly how to go about it.
@mossy geode Has your question been resolved?
@mossy geode well you dont have to differentiate implicity
you could just find each piece of the hyperbola
differentiate to get slope
then just substitution should get you the other number
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I set up an equation and found the derivative for it but im confused on what i should do next
should I use the quadratic formula and then solve for the distance?
I'd recommend drawing a graph first, and also show what you have done so far
Hint: Pythagoras theorem
Would this be right for the derivative?
i think imma have to simplify next but idk
Okay I see I think your C is fine
I did that next
Would it be 1.9mi?
*1.197
Yep you got it
Okii, ty! :>
Also, for the cost should I just sub in 1.97 into the original equation?
Yes
tyty
I got $996,862.70, would that be right?
Seems correct
,w 75000(8-18/sqrt(7))+100000sqrt((8-(8-18/sqrt(7)))^2 + 36)
Closed by @hushed condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if a graph has any unit for the y axis and a count/number as the x denotated as n(all natural numbers). Then what would be the unit for the slope?
hmm i was thinking like the y axis would be like diameter of hole in meters and the x is like the number of holes
uh hmm i don't understand what you mean by that
hmm ill send an example problem
ah ok so they're ordered in some way and the horizontal axis is the ring number
yeah
im wondering if the slope would be in cm2 or cm2/n ring
something like that ig
i think I'd probably say cm^2/ring if i were pressed about it
Closed by @normal mortar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the plane extends infinitely by virtue of being a plane at all
do you know what a plane is?
if you do
highlight plane BCH in one colour
and plane DEF in another
send picture
correct
do you notice how both planes touch the line segment E F
Closed by @slim fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont have any idea how it goes from the step with -v' +(4/x)v = x^3 to everything else
I tried following steps that i learned earlier on how to solve linear ode but it doesn't give me anything like what is shown
<@&286206848099549185>
can anyone explain how to get to v(x) = cx^4 - x^4ln(x)
i've calculated u(x) to be x^4 so I know where that comes from but nothing else
@glass tundra Has your question been resolved?
I have a question
Draw a circle with whose diameter is 10cm Find its radius
pls someone
!help
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you figure out the y intercept of this graph?
Which graph
the red graph
plug in x = 0
that is the answer but I don't understand how they got y
Oh the y axis, the x coordinate is 0
I would if I had the formula, I'm only given the graph
this is the original graph
well the intercept would be f(1)
Which uh you can't know
For sure
Do you know how to compute integrals
wait but we don't know if f is a polynomial
this question is trying to access the skills of how well you can transform a graph without the equation
unless its those things where the answer shows extra info that you can't actually get
I mean finding the equation of y = f(x) is easy enough assuming it's a degree 3 polynomial
well its ceertain that the numbers are around (x+4)(x-3)x but the numbers are much more specific then meets the eye, I tried graphing it in desmos... It didn't work
if you can't figure it out its ok
You need to include a scaling factor
ax(x - 3)(x + 4)
Solve for a using the maxima or minima
And see if it aligns
@crimson pumice Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @crimson pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i go about starting this?
not sure but it probably is linear equations
consider the equation in the form y=mx+b
Isn't this linear algebra though..?
???
then y=9(3)+b?
Where's y?
m is the slope
yea
m being slope and b being y intercept
substitude?
you don't know substitution?
oh i thought you meant something completely different
it just mean plug in
yes
..now what? we got the y intercept
yes
@silver token Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Can you tell me what is the general form of the slope intercept form
y=mx+c
So here what will be m = ?
m = 9
where m is the slope of the line
great and this line will pass thru (3,9) so can you tell me what will be b
they made me go through some computing and we ended with b=-18
is b=-18 correct? @left crest
Yes, now can you tell me the equation of the line
Yes
no..? what do you mean by equation of the line?
y=9x-18?
Yes
Now take y on the same side as the x variable and take the constant on the other side
You will be it of the form Ax + By =C
so will it be 18=9x-y?
Yes,
Now tell me What is A, B and C
note that A, B and C are integers so they can be negative
A=9 B=(-1) C=18
Great, you got the answers.
Closed by @silver token
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
HOw do you do 9-5y=10f/2
and then the value of y is 0.2302149
Show the original question.
Ahn that's a different thing
In terms of y ?
yes
context of question? and source?
my friend gave it
That was kinda expected
Is it $$9 - 5y = \frac{10f}{2}$$?
Alberto Z.
thats the question
Ok, you can first simplify the RHS @chilly oyster
But can't you make your friend enter the chat instead of you telling him later how to solve it?
No problem, it was only for him so that we can understand what he really nees help for
Closed by @chilly oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
y=-f+9/5
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what do they mean by $a_{pq}$
?
bearcw
It means that the index is the product between p and q
Yes
Closed by @dawn jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
At the end, why do they get the area as 1/2 r^2(2theta) instead of pi r^2 * 2theta
the sector is (2theta)/(2pi) of the circle
so the area would be ((2theta)/(2pi))*pi r^2
simplifying gives us theta*r^2
which is what they got
no problem
.close
Closed by @void relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats is pi for math? the symbol like this "n" but the head is in a straight line
Pi is the ratio (fraction) of the circumference of a circle over its diameter
There are many ways to define pi
,w define pi
The area under the graph of (x^2 + 1)^(-1) 
@visual drift Has your question been resolved?
The only number such that, for the morphism $f:\begin{cases} (\bR,+)\longrightarrow (\bC^*,Γ)\
x\longmapsto e^{ix}\end{cases}, Ker(f) = 2\pi\bZ$
rafilou2003
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Write the trigonometric equation for the function with a period of 5, a low point of β 3 at x=1 and an amplitude of 7
What have you got so far
you have unbalanced parentheses and it's making it hard to tell what you meant to say
don't really get how you end up with this
first you'd start with the amplitude
sin(x) has an amplitude of 1, so 7sin(x) is correct
then you want a period of 5 instead of 2pi, so within sin mul by 2pi and div by 5
yeah
so it ouwld be 2pi/5
?
ys
7sin(x*2pi/5)
and the last part is the displacement for the low point
the low point is at y=-3, but currently all low points are at -7
so we need to do +4
7sin(x*2pi/5)+4
so that would be the equation?
and then we want to move it such that the low point is at x=1
oh yea
yeah
and it should be at 1
so you can move the entire graph by -2.75
how would you do that
@vast shale
if I give you the parabola xΒ², how do you move the graph of the function to the left by 1?
(x+1)Β²
yeah
same for the sin function
just in general, add/sub from the x value within the function
to move it left/right
so for -2.75
it becomes
7sin((x+2.75)*2pi/5)+4
done
wdym proper
wouldn't it have to be a pi or in fractions?
no, whenever you move a graph, you sub/add from x as mentioned before, regardless where it is
e.g.
let this be f(x)
and if you want to move the graph of f(x) to the left by 1
you'd do
ohh okay
likewise for moving right -1
yeah
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I reach the conclusion f(x)=f(9x)/9 in a functional equation problem, how can I move forward
meh just guess and check
I think f(x) = ax but idk how to prove it
Does f have to be continuous?
yeah
@bleak crow Has your question been resolved?
You didnβt ask a full question. Like you didnβt give the domain of the function, and condition like whether itβs continuous or what. For example, f(x)=x when x is rational, =0 otherwise works
Or for any a/b, where a and b not divisible by 3, choose numbers c=c(a/b), d=d(a/b), f((a/b)(9^k))=(9^k)c(a/b), f((3a/b)(9^k))d(a/b), f(x)=0 when x is irrational works
Yeah Iβm sorry
So the original problem is asking to find functions f R to R with the condition that f(f(x)+9y)=f(y)+9x+24y with x,y in R
I got to the conclusion that f(x)=f(9x)/9 and I assumed that f(x)=kx to finish the work but I need to prove it now
I couldnβt find anything tbh
This is the work that led me to that conclusion
f(9y)=f(y)+24y
Also f(9y)=9f(y)
8f(y)=24y
f(y)=3y
Done
Assuming your work is correct, I didnβt check
I checked, correct , your work
So we are done, f(x)=3x
Closed by @bleak crow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
smallest possible value of f(x,y)=x^2+4x+y^2+5
you just have to calculate the minimum value of x^2+4x+5
because any nonzero value of y will make f(x,y) larger than if y=0
oh right cuz y^2 can only be 0 or more
yeah
.close
Closed by @dim hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ty
no problem
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm looking ...
Yes
yes
Yes
Closed by @glass galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
To show that this sequence does not converge
would it suffice to say
if it converges, all subsequences of it converge to the same value
take the subsequence of x_k_n with k=3n = sin(n pi) = { 0, 0 , 0 , ... }
then take the subsequence of x_k_j with k=3/2 j = sin(n pi/2) = {1, 0, -1, 0, 1, ....}
which do not converge to the same value
so thus x_k does not converge
something like that works yea
sick
so
I am trying to show this converges to sqrt(2)/2
I've tried doing some algebra
which I can show if you want
but I just am not getting to anything useful
hi chartbit
here u go
let me know if u need a better pic
Hi 
Do you have to do it directly from the definition of convergence, or are you allowed to use algebra of limits to do it?
definition of convergence
I must show for all eps>0 there is a k in N such that for all k >= n |xk-L|<eps
so I am trying to simplify the x_k - sqrt(2)/2 so I can choose a k based on my epsilon
but it isn't getting any simpler
lol
austin hand reveal
Damn, fair
is atleast common denominators the right idea? I feel like that should be ok to start with
That can make your life easier yea
Another thing is that if you can bound what you have above and then show that the "upper bound" will be less than epsilon, that might be easier
Larger numerator/smaller denom and all 
hmmm
Still playing around with it tbf but that's the first idea I have haha
I've got it to here without doing any bounding
$\left|\frac{(\sqrt{2k+1}-\sqrt{2k}+1)}{2\sqrt{k}+1}\right|$
Austin
Cant do much because in a hurry
But
You can pull out sqrt(2)
Sqrt(2k + 1) = sqrt(2)sqrt(k + 1/2)
And on rhs inside absolute value you got sqrt(2) 1/2
not sure if that helps
that is what we started with
so
I don't think it does
ty Bishop
I keep getting stuck bounding it below something like sqrt(3)/2
lol
like duh
$\frac{\sqrt{2k + 1}}{2 \sqrt{k} + 1} - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} = \sqrt{2}( \frac{ \sqrt{k + \frac{1}{2}}}{2 \sqrt{k} + 1} - \frac{1}{2} )$ , let $a_n = 2$ , then given convergent $x_n$, $a_n \cdot x_n \to 2 \lim(x_n)$
Bishop
what is the purpose of defining the an and from then on?
Wait
Couldnt we do the same for sqrt(2)
then pulling it out maybe would make sense
brb
Oh yea think I've got a way at least, which seems to make life much easier
π‘
We start off with
[
\abs{ \frac{ \sqrt{2k + 1} }{2 \sqrt{k} + 1} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} } = \ldots = \frac{ \abs{ \sqrt{4k + 2} - (2\sqrt{k} + 1) } }{ \sqrt{2} \abs{ 2 \sqrt{k} + 1 } }
]
I'm pretty sure we have that for any $k\geq 1$
[
\abs{ \sqrt{4k + 2} - (2\sqrt{k} + 1) } = 2\sqrt{k} + 1 - \sqrt{4k + 2} = \sqrt{4k} + 1 - \sqrt{4k + 2}
]
and then working from there, you have that the above is bounded above by 1
@dull bear
as $\sqrt{4k} \leq \sqrt{4k + 2}$ and all
@dull bear
Doing a bit of manipulation with that gives you something that is much easier to show converges to zero 
As in show that $\abs{ \frac{ \sqrt{2k + 1} }{2 \sqrt{k} + 1} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} }$ converges to zero by bounding that above and then using epsilon delta on the upper bound you find
@dull bear
Which is the same thing as showing the sequence converges to that limit
$\frac{ \sqrt{k + \frac{1}{2}}}{2( \sqrt{k} + \frac{1}{2})}$ if we yy multiple by 2 it eliminate 2 so we get $| \frac{ \sqrt{k + \frac{1}{2}}}{ \sqrt{k} + \frac{1}{2}} - 1 | < \epsilon$
Better to bound the distance by something that depends on k tbf
Probably won't help a lot to bound it above by sqrt{3}/2
Bishop
Here you get the top line is gonna be at most $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \pqty{2\sqrt{k} + 1} }$
@dull bear
1 sec let me try this
yes I see howthis works
Great
because 1/sqrt(k) -> 0 as k to infinity
but
outside of conceptually
I still need to be able to choose a k(epsilon)
what
Don't you mean delta?
it doesn't suffice to just say oh those go to 0 so it is 1/sqrt(2)
no this is sequences
This is existing result
a_k->a
non-zero b_k-> non-zero b
Then a_k/b_k ->a/b
epsilon N proof
Oh I misread your question
I thought you made an analogy between K and epsilon
Your teacher still require proving things only using Ξ΅-N even in this stage? That will make things really miserable
I actually don't have this yet
but yes I am trying to do this with epsilon N
How about you prove limit of multiplication equals multiplication of limits first, then use itβ¦
well I am allowed to do the multiplication in order to rewrite yes
but then I have
$$\left|\frac{\sqrt{2+\frac{1}{k}}}{2+\frac{1}{k}}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right|$$
Austin
You said yourself, you can use the existing result, that is mul of lims=lim of mul
Nvm kinda dumb
what limits are you supposing we multiply here
How about 1/b_n ->1/b when b_n ->b, if this is not allowed to use prove this first
sqrt(n) - 1 < n ?
a_n/b_n=(a_n)(1/b_n)
ohhhhh
wait I see I thin
think I get it
you are saying
show sqrt(2+1/k) -> sqrt(2)
show 2+1/k -> 2
Yess
He wanted you that understand
2+1/sqrt(k)->2, yes
gotcha
Good
Wait but this the iinequality?
did i remember correctly
This is a correct inequality.

