#help-13
428200 messages · Page 469 of 429
multiply numerator and denom by cos(x) to get rid of nested fractions
@livid hound may I take a picture of my answer and check it if its right ?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Gave you help already
you evaluate g at a+h
and I told you what a and h were
and we already computed g(-1)
You also seem heart-set on using that form of slope, instead of the alternative I presented
I mean... it's the same
but frankly easier to use cause you're given 2 x values.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to calculate the volume of this equation:
y^2 <= z <= 4-x^2
To get a better visual understanding of the problem I have tried to plot it in geogebra, however I am not sure I have done this the right way
I wrote in the surfaces like this to try to plot them
Because if I put the equation as is (after separating it into two) I get two planes
So you want to find the min/max of each variable (possibly in terms of other variables if inside)
and assuming you're integrating this in cartesian ig
I usually approach by trying to figure out which is the 'easiest' to put on the outside
Yeah the task is just to calculate the volume of the area enclosed within that equation
But sometimes it doesn't matter which goes outside
Here, I 'feel' like dz should go on outside
This is what I get if I plot it like this and I have no clue why. Its not even on the z axis.
My question right now is to see if I plotted the equation correctly
Like a visual understanding is important, but there is a lot you can do algebraically
uhhhh im not sure honestly
as in if it is the volume between those two planes I showed in the beginning
yeah because here I just have two overlapping planes on the xy plane which... has no volume you know
$y^2 \le z \le 4-x^2$
Shuri2060
not really?
When I say bounds for z
I'm missing something obvious aren't I
we need all of the possible values z can reach
If we are having z as the outside integral
$$\int\int\int 1 \dd x\dd y \dd z$$
Shuri2060
Look, your integral will be the above
yeah That much I know
but you are free to rearrange the dx dy dz
So first you should choose which one goes on outside
dz on outside makes most sense to me
If the first plot is correct then it should be z on the outside as the planes make a circle on the xy plane which makes the xy bit easy
If dz is on the outside
then the bounds for z
should be the minimal and maximal possible values of z
in the entire region
$y^2 \le z \le 4-x^2$
Shuri2060
This can be found via this inequality
0 to 4?
I found that graphically though so no clue how you would do this algebraically
Exactly,
You are finding the min/max values of z algebraically
in that entire region
in other words, you are minimizing y^2
and maximizing 4-x^2
$0 \le z \le 4$
Shuri2060
Yeah sorry I still dont quite get it
Im an engineering student for the record, we are as dumb as rocks
dw about it, you're new to this.
Let's suppose for a sec
we have our integral ordered like this
$$\int^{z = u}{z = l}\int^{y = u(z)}{y =l(z)}\int^{x = u(y, z)}_{x = l(y, z)} 1 ,\dd x,\dd y,\dd z$$
Shuri2060
Note u and l are different functions in each
yes
But I'm trying to say that the upper/lower bounds will be functions of various things depending on where its located
So for the outside bounds
They will just be constants
The have to represent the maximal and minimal value of the variable in the entire region
Right, that I get, but how do I get it
Otherwise your integral won't cover the entire region
So here we have an inequality bounding z
This inequality tells us the maximal range of z
when the left side is minimized, and the right side is maximized
right this is the bit I dont get
probably a language thing
This is actually 2 inequalities (we are technically treating them separately)
I study in Swedish
yeah that I realised
$$y^2 \le z$$
$$z \le 4-x^2$$
Shuri2060
Right ok.
We only have these 2 inequalities which tell us everything about the region
We want to find the range of z --- every single possible value of z
Aye
$$y^2\le z$$
Shuri2060
Since $y\in\bR$
Shuri2060
We know $$0\le y^2\le z$$
Shuri2060
Similarly $$z \le 4-x^2 \le 4$$ since $x\in\bR$
Shuri2060
$$0\le y^2\le z\le 4-x^2 \le 4$$
Shuri2060
So we have this
Right
And those bounds can be achieved when y = 0 or x = 0
Im still not entirely sure what happened oh nevermind it just clicked hahaha
yep now it makes sense,
$$z: 0\to 4
ok texit
$$\int^4_0\int\int1,\dd x,\dd y,\dd z$$
Shuri2060
So you have this (x and y might be swapped)
Then you need to repeat the same process for x or y
Find the smallest and largest possible value it can be depending on z
Right so how would I go about that for y then? Rearrange it somehow or just use y^2<=z
Yep y would be 0 to 2
not quite
nvm then
right
$$0\le |y|\le \sqrt{z}$$
0<=y<=sqrt{z}
Shuri2060
y can be negative, remember.
So can you see what the bounds for y should be?
$$\sqrt{a^2} = \abs{a}$$
Shuri2060
^just remember the sqrt of a^2 should be this in general
The inside bounds need to depend on the outside bounds
The bounds will be a function of z
Like so.
I dont quite get that
Imagine moving along the z axis
Yeah
You are observing what the max y and min y
should be
depending where you are on the z axis
Right
and say z=1 gives me plus minus 1 due to the square root
Is this the bit I am missing or am I wrong again
oOh
This inequality tells you this, indeed
Right, I feel like I am getting on the right track
So y would go
-2 to 2
same for x really I think
Its not
If z = 1
-1 =< y =< 1
The limits being -2 to 2 are incorrect
yeah I meant if I maximise z to 4
Right -1 to 1 if z = 1
Oh right in the integral Ill be stepping up the z axis
and getting different bounds depending on z
allright makes sense
So it goes from -sqrt(z) to +sqrt(z)
This kind of thing is where the geometrical intuition is useful
You imagine the difference slices along z
and need the max/min of y for each individual slice
z<=4-x^2<=4
yeah no this is great, I would have a much easier time visualising things if I was more confident on how things should look. By the looks of things the plot with two planes seems to be right, and so far the intervals are making sense
👌
Right trying for x
sqrt(z)<=2-abs(x)<=2
Right no sqrt(4) should be plus minus 2 right
yeah no it has to be a function of x and y
$$z\le4-x^2\le4$$
Shuri2060
What did you do next?
The the square root of the entire thing
I mean I could have just done this instead
move 4 from the rightmost thing
to the middle
Taking it out
Nah that doesnt feel right at all
So get x alone
Actually hold on
You can rewrite 4-x^2 to (2-x)(2+x)
I dont think that helps nvm
yh i dont think so either
Hm
Maybe I should separate them and see if I understand it any better
But if its the innermost inegral it should be a function of z and y as I will be stepping along those axis
No?
It is a function of z and y
but actually, you should already see that x will turn out not to depend on y
Aye
Because z gives the stronger bound
You need to take this and apply the same process as before
The process before was isolating x
$$0\le \abs{y}\le \sqrt{z}$$
Shuri2060
aye
Shuri2060
yeah thats the bound
Right so we go 0 to 4 on the z axis, meaning for z=0 we get
0<=4-x^2<=4
which gives x: -2 to 2
and for z=4 we get
4<=4-x^2<=4
which gives x=0
I'm not sure what you're doing
ok i guess I can see
You need to treat this inequality algebraically
me neither I will be honest, I am very sorry
Like any other inequality/equation you are trying to solvefor x
You do this through algebraic manipulation
inequality signs flip
right
4-z>=x^2>=0
now square root of it all
sqrt(4-z)>=abs(x)>=0
meaning
-sqrt(4-z)<=x<=sqrt(4-z)
so for z = 0 I get -2<=x<=2, for 4 I get 0<=x<=0
yh
👌
Eyoo it worked, thanks a lot @jaunty mural !!
Very sorry for being slow with understanding and thank you for being patient with that, its a bit funny because lagrange and jacobians and stuff with derivatives I get quite quickly while integrals have been slow for me.
I've had enough heruekas this session that I'll probably not forget this for a long while
No worries 👌
Closed by @keen jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,w derivative 2sec(x)
,w derivative 2tan(x) sec(x)
Do you have a question?
yes
oh ok lol
,w (2cos^3(x)+2sin^3(x))/(cos^4(x))=2sec(x)(tan^2(x)+sec^2(x))
no
can i see your work
give me a sec
rather than take a picture of chicken scratch I will walk you through it
so i took 2tanxsecx
to mean
2sinx/cos^2x
if that is wrong then I messed up step 1
why break it into a quotient instead of just using product rule
hmm
well i was trying to work only with sine and cosine
cuz at this point I only know derivatives of sine and cosine
also if I do (2sinx)(1/cosx)(1/cosx) idk how to use product rule for 3 factors
maybe ((2cosx)(1/cosx) + (1/-sinx)(2sinx))(1/cosx) ?
if you only know sin and cos derivatives, that's alright
your first step is correct
where did you go from here
my next derivative from here is
actually question
derivative of cos^2x = -sin^2x right?
just want to make sure I dont need to use power rule
-2sinx?
idk why they are having me do this in 2.4 we dont learn chain rule until chapter 3
nope
Closed by @real bone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
👍
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Post the full question and show what you've tried so far
just have to integrate it
ive tried U-sub
what would be the best way to do it
I can U-sub
make U be 49-x^2
i get du as -2x
If you see something like
sqrt(constant - x²)
try substituting x = sqrt(constant) sin(u)
(or cos)
Due to sin² + cos² = 1 this will make the sqrt thing go away.
wait what
Just try it 🙂
ok
but why would i do that
i probably cant use that either my teacher gonna be like where did you learn that from
It's not an obvious thing if you have not seen it before.
Actually I think the substitution you started will be good too.
For me just sqrt(49 - x²) => Me immediately wanting to substitute sin/cos. xD
is there anyother way besides u-sub
i want an optimal way
i can do the u sub but i feel their has to be another way
The optimal way is to guess the right integral and to just check that it has the correct derivative.
I don't think there is another way.
Closed by @chrome hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For each integer r in {0,1,2,3,4}, let A_r be the set of all integers which leave a remainder of r when divided by 5. (That is, x in A_r iff x=5q+r for some integer q.) Prove: {A_0, A_1, A_2, A_3, A_4} is a partition of Z.
I'm new to partitions and only saw examples, so I'm not entirely sure on how to prove that this is a partition
do it with the checklist
need to verify they're all subsets, all non-empty, pairwise disjoint, and union to Z
I'm not sure how to tho
I'm confused
Do I use the x=5q+r? For what you're talking about?
Yes, you'll need to use how A_r is defined.
Like, clearly A_r are subsets
$q,r\in\mathbb{Z}\implies 5q+r\in\mathbb{Z}$
Mosh
That's how you'll start it off?
First prove they are subsets.
Before I do so
I have a quick question about partitions
Like the definition
A partition is a family of non-empty subsets of A:
- if any two classes, say A_i and A_j, have common element x (not disjoint), then A_i=A_j
- every element x of A lies in one of the classes
Could you further explain?
(we did examples in class but not where we had to prove, nor did he say how)
Really? In my book, it says "and"
I guess the 2nd leans on none of the partitioned sets can be empty
Oh
But, as I said already, you just prove the 4 defining requirements
If I tell you that the evens and odds form a partition of the integers, would you understand why?
Not really no
Check the requirements
I think you need to go through some examples to get the concept yh 👀
2Z and 2Z+1 are both subsets of Z
They're both non-empty
No integer is both even or odd, thus they're disjoint
Every integer is either even or odd, so they union to Z
We did, but they were a bit complicated to me
$$\bigcup A_i = X$$
$$\bigcap A_i = \emptyset$$
Have you seen in this notation the conditions for a partition of X?
\emptyset btw
I have not
Shuri2060
Perhaps this might be more intuitive than words? Well. In any case, you need to 'digest' what partition means in some way
Okay
they're all subsets, all non-empty, pairwise disjoint, and union to Z
What does pairwise disjoint mean?
Any pair of sets that form your partition have an empty intersection
What exactly does it mean to be an empty intersection?
Their intersection is the empty set
ie. they share no elements
For example, the odds and evens have an empty intersection
Because no number is both odd and even
Ohh
Next, the union of all of the sets making up the partition must be the original set
Another way to phrase is 'nothing is left out of your partition'
Intuitively, you are just chopping your original set up into a bunch of pieces. That's all.
Which is the A_r in this case?
A_r would be the sets you're partitioning Z into.
Okay
Do we want A_i to = A_j? For some integers i and j?
(when I was stating the def)
You want $A_i\cap A_j=\emptyset$ for $i\neq j$
Mosh
Yes.
You need to prove A_r is a subset of Z
As I've said many times, you prove the 4 requirements
$x\in A_r\implies x\in\mathbb{Z}$
Mosh
$A_r\subseteq\mathbb{Z}$
Mosh
Oh I show the iff part?
not at all. There is no mention of groups here.
Okay
there's no iff
yes.
Mosh
It's non-empty because we have more than one integer in this subset?
Mosh
yes, once you've written the proof for subset and non-empty
Have you attempted to prove it or did you look at it and go "No clue"
I attempted
Then erased cuz I got confused
Can I start off by letting an x be an integer? Where x is in A_r and some other set, say A_s?
yes, you do it by contradiction usually
Okay
I'm a bit stuck
How would this lead to contradiction?
We use the form of A_r? x=5q+r
x =5q +s
r=s?
@turbid portal Has your question been resolved?
You just did it
Suppose x in Ar and x in As
Then x = 5q + r = 5q + s
Then r = s
That's it. (btw no contradiction used here by me)
So it's not a contradiction?
You could.
I could've started by saying 'suppose x in Ar and x in As and r =/= s'
Then I would get a contradiction.
But it isn't necessary.
Sorry I wasn't paying attention
So you showed the intersection of any 2 is empty
Now you need to show union of all makes Z?
Could we start off that we know that any remainder, r, is an integer? Or is that irrelevant?
Well there are a variety things you could probably do
That is relevant, but too vague.
I see
so what u wanna show is that any integer
belongs to one of those 5 classes
you can use contradiction if u want, up to u
Classes?
sets
which set is 11 in
right.
now do the same for a general integer
maybe this is bad of me haha
it doesnt really show the way forward
You can just simply state that all integers leave remainder 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 upon division by 5
(maybe you're confused because you're overthinking things)
If you don't think that's enough, you can try a contradiction via algebra or something
When am I never ovethinking things? 
Alright
Thank you Shuri
.close
Closed by @turbid portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
And Mosh
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help solving this question
right, so do i start of by plugging in root 3 in the equation ?
Do u know differentiation
what does this achieve?
u find y
And what does that help with?
hint: it doesn't help, take omar's suggestion.
The derivative f'(x) says what the gradient of the curve is at each x.
not yet
wait, could you define the word, maybe I have done it but it a diff word?
Alright
The derivative f'(x) says what the gradient of the curve is at each x.
They should have taught you this.
yes, we are just getting started with it
so first, do I find the eqaution of the slope
so 10x^4?
and plug root 3 in after
no
I meant gradient function
First derivative, yes.
Yes
no, read the question.
No perhaps the opposite
what do you mean
Last time, we wanted the tangent of the function at a certain value of x
This time they don't seem to want that.
Read the question.
???
what?
Read the question. Slowly.
Yes, we want a certain (x, y) since it asks for a point
But there is more to it.
it says 'each parabola' because your question has multiple parts
multiple parts to what
'Determine the point at which the slope of the tangent to the parabola is 0'
Just read it like this for each part.
thers only 1 more part
'Determine the point at which the slope of the tangent to the parabola is 0'
ik the first part is 12x-3
well yes, that is the derivative.
Do you understand what the question is asking for?
not really other than its a point on a line
- Determine the point at which
- the slope of the (tangent to the parabola)
- is 0
Does that make the question clearer?
so how would i do that
does this has to do anything with 'b' in y=mx+b
well no
do you know what f'(x) is
that is the derivative
f'(x) = 12x - 3 as you have already said
then you set this equal to 0 and solve.
what do i solve if its alr set to 0?
ohhh
find x
and plug x in after to find y
wait no
the 0 is not y correct?
as a point
im getting (4, 45) is that right?
what am i doing wrong
Then you need to plug x = 1/4 back into the original equation
to find the y value at x = 1/4
This gives you the point (x, y) at which f'(x) = 0
for this one im getting (-4/3, 0)
,calc (3/4)(-4/3)^2+2(-4/3)
Result:
-1.3333333333333
No, your y coordinate is wrong.
For both, you need to plug the x into the original equation
yes
ofc
The derivative is just the slope equation
plugging in x tells you the slope
not the y coordinate.
Thats for this very specific question yes...
its not 0, yes.
You can plot these equations in desmos to check your answers
or some similar software
I was wrong about there being no 'iii" part and the 'iii" part deals with desmos
On new lines
(x, y)
^you can input just this
for the specific points you found
and it will display them.
@burnt shard Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @burnt shard
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Suppose that points F,G, and H are collinear, with FG = 7, FH = 2 and GH = 5.
a) explain carefully how ray GH is defined and decide if F is in ray GH
b) If R and S are on the same line containing F and G, and if RF = 12 and SG = 6, find all possible values for RS, assuming Ruler Postulate. What are all of the possibilities?
For a, I started off with basically the def of ray GH => GH = {x | G-X-H or G-H-X or X=G or X=H}
then i said there can be a point in between g and h on the ray or there can be h in between g and that point x
F is on the ray GH since FH=2, FG = 7, GH =5. So if it's G-H-F where x is F, this shows 2+5 = 7
not sure if i was doing this right
but i have to state the other two parts as well
I was told that there are three parts to this
@coral creek Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@coral creek Has your question been resolved?
Please help 🥺
@coral creek Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @coral creek
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hiii please can someone help me on what I can cancel here ?
Please guide me in answering this question im still confused
You can simplify by sin x
which sin x ?
all of them
so the two sin x on the top will be canceled as well in the bottom ?
(sin x - sin x / cos x) / sin2 x = (1 - 1 / cos x) / sin x = (cos x - 1) / (sin x cos x)
Yes
well don't forget the integral around it of course
how did the sin^2x on the denominator become sinx ?
i still dont understand it sorry...
do you see how
(x + y)/z
is x/z + y/z
sin x is a common factor of the numerator and denominator, hence you can simplify by it
if you divide through sin x - tan x by sin²x, you obtain 2 integrals
both of them should be easy
freak i cant visualize what you guys are saying sorry for being so dumb
do you know what i mean
its really hard to understand if I cant see how it was done im so sorryy....
im really bad at this
$\frac{\sin(x)-\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)}}{\sin^2(x)}=\frac{\sin(x)}{\sin(x)}\left(\frac{1-\frac{1}{\cos(x)}}{\sin(x)}\right)$
a disappointing son
hmmm
so like we get the common factor and divide them and that will be the result ?
in general $\frac{kx}{ky} = \frac{x}{y}$
Chromium
we cross out the k
this is the detailed step
are you guys available on a quick voice channel ?
do you understand why this is
i kinda get it now but here is the part where im still confused
that sinx/cosx on the numerator
how did it become 1/cosx?
.
Chromium
what si the name of that topic, ill try to search it at youtube and try to learn it
so you don't..?
oh dear
thank you for all the help
this is one of the first things you learn in algebra
appreciate it
which is wayy before integrals
math really isnt my thing thats why i hate this hahahaha
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm pretty sure I've already solved it but I wanna make sure what I did is valid.
So I figured if that represents one object, I can switch the r and s in both terms, which when rearranged does indeed switch the signs of both terms, same for exchanging i and j.
But what's tripping me up is that I basically just... moved the indices between the deltas, it works... but I don't know if that's allowed? I'm sort of confused.
I think it's allowed because all I was really doing was renaming the indices consistently.
.close
Closed by @hallow folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find y'' and y'
So this question is messing with me big time
for starters
can derivatives have derivatives?
like is that a thing
wdym
second derivatives, third derivaitves etc exist
those are called higher order derivatives
y" is the derivative of y'
so the derivative of a derivative?
Which is just a single derivative of a function called y'
yea
alright i kinda get it so far
so how would I find the y'' and y'
like where would I start?
derivatives are just functions
if you know how to differentiate functions
you know how to differentiate derivatives (which themselves are functions)
it isn't really hard
that i believe you know
??
y is given and is that quadratic.
you don't know what second derivative means?
so if we have y then y' would be 2Ax+B
yes
wait
then y'' would just be 2A
right
??
@gentle lintel would it be right then for y'' to just be 2A
yes
the problem wants us to find the constants of A B and C
yea
im not sure what the constants would be past this point?
you've sovled for y' and y''
yes
yes
you're solving for A, B, C such that this is true
you can do this by comparing coefficients
Chromium
yes
$x^2 (-2A) + x (2A - 2B) + (2A + B - 2C) = x^2 (1) + x (0) + (0)$
solve for the corresponding A, B, C's
do you know comparing coefficients?
Chromium
maybe this looks better to you
i dont think so. maybe i know the concept but not the name
you should obtain a system of equations in A, B, C
what does this mean
wdym
they split the numerator (1)
into 3 variables
then split the OG equation
into 3 parts no?
oh don’t care about the partial fraction part
so here
-2a would be X^2
we can set up a system
like here?
Chromium
yea it's just algebra
Closed by @covert island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the surface area of a heart shape?
There's not really a formula
But I would break it into two semicircles and one big triangle
Then add those areas together
Closed by @eternal siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does the statement quoted in red makes sense?
The proof is by contradiction
But where did the contradiction arise?
The sum of a rational number and a surd cannot be a surd
But from the inital assumption, we came to the conclusion that $m + \sqrt{b} = \sqrt{d}$ or, that the sum of a rational and a surd is a surd, which is mathematically impossible
Hence, the contradiction
[TEB] darthlothins
Closed by @tough osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is this a valid method of algebraic manipulation? Can't you just substitute c(1-b)?
I thought you could only subtract or add between equations
when would you divide between equations?
Nothing wrong with that. That's like saying:
if a = x
And if b = y
Then a/b = x/y
Which should be obvious. Just take a/b, replace the a with x, and replace the b with y. You get x/y, so they're equal
Can do the same with other things, like a^b, provided a is positive.
alright
when would you do it?
@wanton glacier Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
snake and lizard are both defined as integer variables
obviously C is going to execute an integer division
$3 \divisionsymbol 4 = 0$
Ansh
@gaunt trench Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gaunt trench
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to prove that F is derivable on R
Unless I'm missing something
Doesn't this just follow from the fundamental theorem of calculus?
what is the primitive of the function inside the integral?
I don't believe there is an elementary primitive
but
So isn't it true that $F'(x) = e^{x-\frac{x^2}{2}}$?
tatpoj
lets call the primitive smthing other than F since the function is named F
but yes it is
so i don't have to write it as primitive then derivate to get this?
No, the FTC guarantees that this is true
Closed by @half trellis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
18 workers build a house in 15 days. In how many days would 30 workers build a house?
I know is easy but i just wanna know procces beacuse some are harder
And i forgot process
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @indigo basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\ln\left(\frac{k+3}{k}\right)-\ln\left(\frac{k+2}{k-1}\right)$
Big xdddd
how can i show that this is for all k in N < 0?
first i did $$\ln(k+3)-\ln(k)-\ln(k+2)+\ln(k-1)$$
Big xdddd
and then i did $$\ln\left(1+\frac{3}{k}\right) +\ln\left(\frac{k-1}{k+2}\right)$$
Big xdddd
but idk how this is going to help me
Do you mean for N>0?
yes for all natural numbers
Did you try to prove by induction?
you forgot the }
This looks like a typical induction problem
ku-sital
damn i can really do that
Idk how this help
Idk how hard it will be to prove the induction hypothesis though
but this wouldnt be < 0 i guess because $$ \ln\left(1-\frac{3}{k^2+2k}\right) > 0, \forall n\in\mathbb{N}$$
Big xdddd
and this shit is log(1-sth) which is smaller 1
wait but how did you got that what did you do?
ok i got it
thank you!
.close
Closed by @dull anchor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would you calculate the area of a square, inside of a circle?
.close
Closed by @viral tusk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.