#help-13
1 messages · Page 320 of 1
its not enough
this teacher pulls out the most devious questions on the real exam
yk our last test original was out of 50
she curved it to 35
thats how bad it was
ppl were complaining to school admin to fire her 💀
nonoononono
you can do all of them
just be happy and confident
okok hopefullyyyy 🤞
@queen sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @queen sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Obtain a plane, parallel to x+y+z=6, that goes through P.
Obtain a plane, perpendicular to the given line, that goes through P.
Obtain the intersection of those planes. It will be the line asked for.
@unborn plank Has your question been resolved?
how would I obtain the intersection of the two planes?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @unborn plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please give me a nice problem set on indefinite integration for practice? I had an exam on it yesterday, and I completely flunked the integration portion.
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Okay! I go through them
more. again there are definite integrals
also if u have a textbook that will be useful...
Thank you so so much!!!
yw
Can you recommend one
(this one is sorted by type of integral)
My calc portion in general could use the extra help
never used
Okay
Thank you so much
I’ll work on those problems
I really appreciate it
Have a good one
.close
Closed by @white frigate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Does anyone know how i'm suppose to prove this using definitions and properties to support my answer? I know the statement is true but i'm not sure how to say that other than by plugging in numbers.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where did I go wrong? The answers are supposed to be 4 and 8 but I got only 8
yay
also "4 and 8" is not the correct solution set
too nervous haha, so i got wrong
note this: 2sqrt((x - 8)^2) = 2|x - 8|
hence u r solving x + |x - 8| = 8
for x in the domain of the original left hand expression
Doesn't it still result in 8
to deal with absolute value bars, consider splitting
for x > 8, expression equals [this]. for x < 8, expression equals [this]
etc
x >= 8 -> 2x = 16
x <= 8 -> 8=8, which is true for all x <= 8, accounting for the splitting
From what I see but it's wrong
it's not wrong it is the answer
the correct solution set to this problem is the closed interval [4, 8]
Closed by @lament hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yvw 🎉
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Considering C as a constant in the following items, we have that y is implicitly defined as a function of t by the corresponding equation. In each of the items, determine a differential equation for which y is a solution.
i tried to differenciate both sides
a)
ty` - y´/y = 0
is this correct ?
why ? 😭
Forgot product rule on ty 
d/dy(ty) = d/dy(t)y + t d/dy(y) right ?
Remember you’re differentiating with respect to t here 
Hence y turned into y’, rather than just 1
ahhhhh yeah
mb
yeah so i will diferenciate with respect to t , so i get y` in the equation ( which is what they want right ? )
ty
.close
Closed by @fervent arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have the sequence an+1=root(1+2an) where a1=1
I need to study its monotony
You can use induction
or check recurrence
Closed by @terse bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
,rotate
what?
all three
no my question is which of i, ii, and ii- oh
ahk
the coordinates of the vertex are just gonna be -b/2a
if possible, thank you
nw
it's fine my guy
it isn't that big of a deal
not like it's going to change ur future in one fell swoop
for part i, the vertex's x-coord is just -b/2a
for part ii, it's a minimum if the parabola points up (if the coeff of x^2 is positive) and vice versa
and for part iii it's slightly more complicated
?
keep throwing myself off
ren
cannot remember some simple frigging rules
so what does the F(X) stand for currently?
yes
okay, got it
i.e. f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c
f being the question
so where does a and b fall in the equation?
Just need to fully wrap my head around it before tmr
??
i don't get where you're getting f(x) from
a is the coefficient of x^2
b is the coefficient of x
c is the constant
so for example
in 3x^2 + 5x -7
a is 3
b is 5
c is -7
so what would that be for my equation?
try it
seeing as there is only 2 numerals it would be, 2 is a and 4 is b?
no
or is b the x2?
no no no
if i have a quadratic
the coefficient of x^2 is ALWAYS a
the coefficient of x is ALWAYS b
and the constant is ALWAYS c
but HERE
since you have 2x^2 + 0x + 4
b = 0
and c = 4
a = 2
c being what you deal with at the end, got it
so when it displays itself as X without a numeral we Identify it as a 0?
I do not even know what I am frigging saying now
I am so lost
where did the 0x come from?
I think that is what is throwing me off
ren
so, seeing as there is no "3rd" number in there we replace that as a 0?
yes...
alrighty
I like how this here is re-arranged, making it easier to understand.
so would it look something like
0/2x2
@dawn gulch Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Think you can scroll up have a squiz at the previous conversation?
nah i dont have that much time u just explian i also got exam tmrw
the axis of symmetry
wah
I do not understand that
so would it look like
0/2x2
write it on ur copy i cant understand like this
waaaah how did u get this
use quadratic formula
b^2-4ac
then use the formula for x
ok
whts the statement
nvm
i cant do the calculation in my head
so
x= 2+4 times root of 2/4
the other value is just negative
solve it u will get the value
oh wait
x= root 2
and -root 2
check if its correct
hmm, okay
so is it correct?
ok
huh
just need help fixing up my process
As you can see I have made an issue regarding the equation under x=0 and above =4+
I am well and truely effed for my test tomorrow
you know what I am reffering to?
above as in [4,->〉?
I need the equation to be fixed for me'
"when x=0, f(x)= . . .
I need that fixed
hello?
it is 2x^2+4 put the value of x 0
wait
does ur question say to make a graph?
like this
as i was saying put value of x 0 in the eq.
u get 6
so it should be 6,4 absed on wht u wrote
I know what the final answer is (0,4) but I am trying to figure out where I went wrong in the equation
no ur going correct way
oh ok
lol
thanks for your assistance monkey
.close
Closed by @dawn gulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Somone can help with this,? solve for all x
what have you tried so far
Take tangens on both sides, geting tha awnser 1. But its not rights.
@faint egret Has your question been resolved?
are u supposed to solve for x?
Yes, find all answers for x. Ofcourse x =-1 is not ok.
I dont have the answer. But if I plot the graph I see that all values below -1 is ok......
@faint egret Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did u do the first part?
its a bit of a shoddy solution
i did dy/dx = something
then divide top and bottom by 1/x
then u=y/x
then integrate and resub
but i dont think that is the intended solution
yeah you haven't written it as d/dx (F(x,y) ) = 0
well I suggested a way earlier, but everybody was yapping about y=vx
ahaha everyone is an npc
well it would just be 2x + 2y dy/dx
yes exactly
you got the 2x by differentiating x^2 + y^2 w.r.t. x and 2y by differentiating x^2 + y^2 w.r.t. y
so there are technically 2 ways of doing the first part
you could integrate it formally etc. but i think the easiest way to go about it is
can you think of a function F(x,y) where if i differentiate it w.r.t. x, i get 2x+y
and if i differentiate it w.r.t y, i get x+2y
oh yeah x^2 + xy + y^2
= c
is there a more rigourous way to do it than inspection?
basically this
if you think about what u've actually done, you've integrated 2x+y w.r.t. x
that leaves you with x^2 + xy + g(y)
and then you can solve for g(y)
but often depending on how good ur inspection skills are, you can just inspect it
now can u use this method to solve the circled red part?
I haven't seen this before, is this a standard result?
if you integrate y w.r.t x do you get xy + g(y)
also i read this and it seems like they didn't actually give you a reason why you should try y=vx, whilst that isn't the point of the question it's a standard technique so i feel like i should give a quick explanation
oh ok thanks
basically, if you look, the 'degree' of 2x+y is '1' (it's linear)
and the degree of the thing in front of dy/dx is 1 too
whenever you have a homogeneous linear d.e. where everything is of the same degree, y=vx will often simplify the problem
well basically if you think about non-multivariable calculus
if i integrated 5 i would get 5x+c where c is a constant
oh i see
but now if i have a function of x and y
and i say integrated y w.r.t. x
then i'd get xy + g(y) because essentially, g(y) acts as the constant
oh that actually makes a lot of sense
if you think about it, xy + y^2 and xy + e^cos(ln(y)) etc. all differentiate (w.r.t. x) to give y
nw!
I actually applied this now on this problem, thanks
exact equations baby
reversed product rule
I'm starting uni soon and they gave us some prereading stuff but we haven't learned some topics so I wasn't sure about stuff like this
yea
thanks
damn that method is actually really faster
@harsh skiff Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @harsh skiff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to do part (iii)
Are you in calculus?
Yuh
Like in part i?
Yea I think so
Basically if you have a position function
Its derivative is velocity
The reason i ask about whether youre in calculus is because the way you'd figure this out or answer is affected by what tools you have
Well you got it right actually
I just checked
Once you have velocity
Do you know how to check for increase/decrease
the acceleration?
Uhh let me rephrase
Once you got velocity do you know how to check for places where v(t) is positive or negative
no
Ok so basically
If you have a nice continuous function
It changes signs from + to - at its zeros
So basically
Find the zeros of velocity
Start there
Well you kinda did already right
Yes it's true
But like
If I'm moving forward
And then start moving backward
Along the way i had to stop right?
yup
That's what you're looking for now
The moments where you stop as you change direction
Once you get those zeros
Put them on like a number line
------------|----------|-----
1 3
Like that kinda
okok
yea
Test numbers in each region
To check their sign
Just checking positive or negative
For example you could plug in 0 for x < 1
wdym by test the numbers
9
oh so its moving forward
Then v is negative in that region
moving backwards?
Yep
so it turned at t=1?
Yea basically
then how does it go to t=3
Wdym
Time moves forward
That doesn't mean i physically move forward
When i walk backwards, time is still moving forward
how would it show in the timeline
Well the original function is position right
When v turns negative the position function would start going downward
On the graph
position function as in displacement?
Yes it's a displacement function in this case
alr alr
9
Ok so then positive
Alright so in this interval
You had some time spent moving in the positive direction and some time spent moving in the negative direction right
right
Ok so then consider this
If i walk 10 meter forward
Then 10 meter backwards
How much was my total displacement
0
u moved 20m
facts
Part iii answer:
Because velocity takes on both positive and negative values for t in that interval, this means that at some point you traveled in opposite directions
Therefore, total distance traveled will be higher than total displacement
ohh i get it now
so to find total distance then we need to find the total displacement between in each interval?
to find the displacements do I input t as the points where they stopped in the eqn for displacement
That's right
Because it's at those times that the particle turns around
So basically you'll find 3 displacements for 3 regions
so i put the values 1 and 3 of t into the eqn?
Well it's like
Distance traveled during leg 1 of the journey
Leg 1 is the first positive region
So
T = 0 to t = 1
Find displacement between t = 0 and t = 1
That's the first part
put 1 as t?
This well tell you how many meters forward you walked
Do
Final position - initial position
ohh ok
for the next displacement do i find P(1) - P(3)
Well technically other way around
As it should be negative in this leg
ohh
It's
Final - Initial
So
P(3) - P(1)
That being said....!
You need the absolute value of this either way for this part
then the last one would be p(4) - P(3)
Yessss exactly
Then you'll get 2 positive, 1 negative
Your total distance traveled is the absolute value of all those numbers added together
So that when you walk 10 ft forwards and 10 ft backwards we call it 20 ft rather than 0
That's the difference between distance and displacement
alr alr thankss
Yw
.close
Closed by @cerulean wind
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did they split this
it'd be cool if I could get a zoomed in picture but uh factorisation ig?
how so
is there some identity like $a^2+b^2+c^2 = (a+b+c)(a-b-c)$
sviyyyy
but that's wrong isn't it
Did they even write that correct
I think they meant (x^2 + x + 1)(x^2 - x + 1)
In the latter case, you can difference of two squares that, ((x^2 + 1) + x)((x^2 + 1) - x) 
no but wait let me process
but it's x^2-x+1
(x^2 + 1) - x is the same thing 
Just written differently to make it more convenient to work with 
A good question, for which I don't think I have a helpful answer
someone may have one that would be of help
This is one of the examples of a polynomial of degree strictly greater than 3 which factors but doesn't have any (real) roots/zeros, probably the best example of one
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
It is easy
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I might have a brainfart.
Question about derivative.
I have this function of a particle's velocity:
and to find the acceleration of the particle, you find the derivative of the function, correct?
With respect to time yes
and when you derive... for example... Bcos(wt), it becomes -wBsin(wt)?
Yes
why does the answer sheet say this? 💀
Doesn't seem correct
Yeah they probably made a mistake
Closed by @floral terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, someone help me with this exercise pls?
The rank of the standard matrix is equal to the dimension of the image set, so I thought about reducing the matrix by gaussian but I don't have all the values of a left.
Did you ref this matrix regardless?
yes
show
what do you mean?
bacc
a
Also I don't understand your 2nd matrix
You are multiply the first row by -2a
-2a-2a²-2a(a+1)
0 -2a²+2 -2a²+2
for most values of a, the matrix is probably non-singular
so kernel = 0, image = R^3 for most values of a
i'm expecting there to be like only a few values of a where the matrix is singular
so i'd just analyse those 1 by 1
that's what i think would be the easiest way to approach this problem
I was wrong
We are all wrong at least once in life
these are the answers
I realized that it comes out equaling the determinant of the matrix to zero, but I do not understand why xd
if det != 0, then you can inverse the matrix
so Mx = 0 => x = 0
@sharp cradle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do you see a mistake?
First box is what is given
It seems like a fairly easy question
98/5 is ?🤨
why is there a gif in the middle of the channel
Should have seen the other gif which was deleted
@somber ibex Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Intuition for proving that $f(x, y) = \frac{x^3}{x^2 + y^4}$ is continuous at $(0, 0)$?
Bean Man
In class we proved it by bounded it by a continuous function that approached zero.
Oh yea and f(0, 0) is defined to be = 0
With the formal definition we want to say that $$\forall \epsilon, \exists \delta \text{ such that } ||(x_1, y_1) - (x_2, y_2)|| < \delta \implies |f(x_1, y_1) - f(x_2, y_2)| < \epsilon$$.
All we did in class was show that $f(x) \leq |x|$ and since we are taking the limit as $x$ approaches zero, then we've proven it?? I don't understand why thats sufficient.
Bean Man
@ancient quarry Has your question been resolved?
$0 \leq f(x,y) \leq |x|$
it's the squeeze theorem for multivariate functions
Morrow
You can convert it to an epsilon-delta argument
Let $\varepsilon > 0$, take $\delta = \varepsilon$ (the same $\delta$ we'd take if we were trying to find the limit of $|x|$ as $x \to 0$) then if $|(x,y)| < \delta$ in particular $|x| < \delta$ and hence $$|f(x,y)| \leq |x| < \delta = \varepsilon.$$
Morrow
(I'm assuming you separately define f(0,0) = 0)
yea
It makes sense when I think about it, but it doesn't immediately go ding ding ding and I think its because bounding the function isn't giving me and idea of what the function is doing outside of that point. Does this kind of argument work when we don't have f(0, 0) = 0? Is it the case whenever we can bound the function?
Well the bounding function tells you that locally, near (0,0), f(x,y) is small. How small? At least as small as |x|. So naturally, f(x,y) goes to zero as (x,y) goes to (0,0), since |x| does and f(x,y) is even smaller.
If f(0,0) is not 0 then you just end up with a removable discontinuity
Which is not a big deal
Would I be able to use the same kind of strategy to prove that it is continuous at (0, 0)?
Yeah you just have to adjust the argument slightly.
Instead of saying f(x,y) is small you say that f(x,y) - 1 is small.
So you say |f(x,y) - 1| <= |x|
and it works out the same
yeah 1 <= |f(x, y)| <= |x| + 1 would work too
actually no
since that shows that |f(x,y)| -> 1
but we need f(x,y) -> 1
in the 0 case the absolute value doesn't matter
but in the 1 case it does
oh god
Yeah that's the squeeze theorem
In calculus, the squeeze theorem (also known as the sandwich theorem, among other names) is a theorem regarding the limit of a function that is bounded between two other functions.
The squeeze theorem is used in calculus and mathematical analysis, typically to confirm the limit of a function via comparison with two other functions whose limits a...
OHHH WAIT
I was only confused because I wasn't understanding it generally. The point of the upper bound is that it globally upper bounds our f(x,y)
We don't need the fact that its everywhere, but just locally around that point, but I wasn't thinking about it bounding it for some region, just after some point in my head
for whatever reason I was thinking about |x| as a function on [0, infty)
Alright that was my dumb moment of the day, everything makes sense now, thank you
.close
Closed by @ancient quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@hoary mauve Has your question been resolved?
@hoary mauve Has your question been resolved?
@hoary mauve Has your question been resolved?
@hoary mauve Has your question been resolved?
@hoary mauve Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hoary mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
product and quotient rule
use the definition
uh
can you write down the product rule
nx^n-1
what
ok you don't know the product rule
is there another way to do this
This is the product rule
so then
bacc
So just apply the definition
you dont need to know the actual function because you are given the values that you need
$P'(x) = F'(x)G(x) + F(x)G'(x)$
Devil Wears Prada
with the graph you could actually get them
reminds me of double angle formula for trig
its not defined so therefore im not doing it
(1,4),(2,3) and(3,4)
you are not defined
the parabola could be 1.00001x^2
your job is to count squares and use the average rate formula for the first derivative
then your value for derivative isnt either
its a piecewise so how can i even get the derivative
no. the job is to obtain the derivative at two points
piecewise as well
so how would i go about finding F'(x)
you can literally see it
F can be diff everywhere except 3, G everywhere except 4
WHAT
you don't need to consider where it peaks for this task
im overstimulated
anyways, assuming you dont want to obtain the function
Closed by @vapid otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
and using this instead
😂
ok
😈
bro is coping
Missionary so I can stare into her blue sea-eyes, piercing through the red sea, while conquering the depths of the dark sea in her heart.
.close
wait
@dreamy void
look at the question
find P'(2)
F'(2) = 0
right
G'(2) = 1/2
now yes
at least open your channel
.
.reopen
✅
no
:bending_skull:
what
you need also F(2) and G(2)
p' = f' g + f g'
bruh
look at this again
Astar777
yes 7/4

yes
other helpful gave up
fire him
:bending_skull:
i mean, i would not expect him to make such elementary mistakes
like not distinguishing a sum from a product
there are worse
someone did (2)(3)(6) = 2(3) + 2(6)
the skull that bends
i know
and they were calculating derivatives
and surprisingly they understood derivatives
but struggled with arithmetic
:bending_skull:
you are arriving every-time layla is somewhere
is this done? 👍
Closed by @vapid otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
^^for excessive hate
:bending_skull:
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if y=3u^2-cosx
whats u
so y = 3x - cosx?
or something else
if u = sqrt(x)
yea but it's only defined for x >= 0
.close
.close
.close
Closed by @lofty light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the first digit can be any from 1-9 ,the second can be any from 0-9 except the first digit , and the third can be any from 0-9 except the first two digits. Thus, the total possible numbers are 9* 9* 8
@compact gulch Has your question been resolved?
okay thanks., what about part (ii)
For (ii), there are 5 odd numbers from 0 to 9. For the 700s and 900s, the last digit has 4 options (excluding 7 or(excluding or) 9), and the second digit has 8 options (excluding first digit and the last digit). For the 800s, the last digit has 5 options and the second digit still has 8 options. Therefore, the total possible numbers is 8 * 4 + 8 * 4 + 8 * 5 = 104
okay tysm!
.close
Closed by @compact gulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have the following four premises and would like to know whether they are enough to entail the conclusion (and if now what other premise is required). The 'grounding relationship' is a relationship between two propositions which is transitive (see P2.) and factive (see P4.) (it's also asymmetric, but that doesn't matter for now, I think). p grounds q is symbolised as "<p ← q.>''. 'Q', 'T' and 'S' are names of particular propositions:
[P1.] ◻(Q → <Q ← T.>)
[P2.] ∀p, q, r ◻((<p ← q.> & <q ← r.>) → <p ← r.>)]
[P3.] ◻(T → <T ← S.>)
[P4.] ∀p, q ◻( (p ← q.) → (p & q))
[C.] ◻(Q → <Q ← S.>)
@half vault Has your question been resolved?
Looks ok to me
- Q and P1 and P4 give you T
- Q and P1 give you <Q ← T.>
- T and P3 give you <T ← S.>
- <Q ← T.> and <T ← S.> and P2 give you <Q ← S.>
- so Q and P{1,2,3,4} give you <Q ← S.>, which is just C
thansk!
Closed by @half vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
solved, I think:
[P1.] ◻(Q → <Q ← T.>)
[P2.] ∀p, q, r ◻((<p ← q.> & <q ← r.>) → <p ← r.>)]
[P3.] ◻(T → <T ← S.>)
[P4.] ∀p, q ◻( (p ← q.) → (p & q))
[C1.] ◻(Q → (<Q ← T.> & T) ) {P1. and P4.}
[C2.] ◻(Q → T) {C1. and P0.}
[C3.] ◻(Q → <T ← S.>) {C2. and P3. and the transitivity of strict implication}
[C.] ◻(Q → <Q ← S.>) {P1., C3. and P2.}
Do you have another question?
@half vault Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @half vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did they get 24/pi on the outside
dont you just pull 4 out
u sub
They multiplied 4 by a whole fraction. (6/pi)/(6/pi).
notice how in the integrand there is a pi/6
right usub is 4 sec u * 6/pi
well that’s not how i’d integrate secant
you pull the 4 and 6/pi out and get 24/pi yes but that just leaves you with 24/pi integral sec u
oh mb i forgor
ln|secu + tanu|
yup
so 24/pi * integral from [0,2] (ln|sec pi/6 + tan pi/6)?
no
you already integrated
why the integral again
you’re evaluating the anti derivative from 0 to 2 sure
but it’s not an integral
Closed by @cloud warren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no idea how to approach this problem
<@&286206848099549185>
@cinder walrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
calculus
calculus
hmm ok
ok i think it's false
do you think this is true or false? try some okok
cuz there is not enough info
why's that
yep that's good
what you've produced is called a counterexample
and it's enough to show something is false
fr
Closed by @ionic wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
I want integration questions
MIT Integration Bee Website
@tidal snow Has your question been resolved?
school level? or..
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I recently was introduced to trignometry and OMFG that shit is hard af, I have no clue what I am proving nor what I am doing, I feel like I am aimless, How to be better at dis shiii
Well the most important thing imo is understanding the first quadrant
Because all the "important" angles and numbers basically repeat from there
So you can just learn the values for a few angles
Instead of for idk how many in the whole circle
2cos theta= x+1/x then the value of 2 cos 3theta?
Weird shit like this is asked
I am a rookie so dont have much of an idea
They ask you what is 2cos(3x) ?
nah
Trigonometry may seem tough at first, but with some practice and patience, you'll start to grasp the concepts. Try focusing on small steps, learning the basic definitions, and connecting trigonometric functions to the geometry of triangles. Regular practice will help, and don’t get discouraged—progress comes gradually!
3*theta
Yea sorry let x = theta
But
Do you have a pic of the problems
its already given as x+1/x right?
Yea gimme a sec
Thats the one I am dealing currently with
@solar edge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with this proof
so far i made the ratios x/y, y/z, and z/x and used componendo dividendo to make them in the correct format
For Example:
but when i tried with the other ratios and then plugged it all back into the question it didn't cancel out for some reason
algebraic trigonometry
JEE
lmao
its a JEE question thats why
i was just doing for fun because its known as the hardest exam in the world
JEE is 10-12th grade math
but i dont live in india so i cant take it anyways just for fun
same
but like its not that hard
im just getting the negatives wrong
did you take trig yet?
or calculus
because often there are no numbers
ah i see
these are trig identities
learned later in the year
im practicing these because i want to try for the IMO USA team
kind of
but the identities are not like differences of squares
they are more like proofs about the properties of basic sin cos tan
for example sin^2(theta)+cos^2(theta)=1
it works for all angles subbed in for theta
or radians if you know what those are
yeah
@raw hinge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could somebody explain part a(i) to me please I don't get it
How do they know this ?
I thought if it was an asymptote that would mean that it always get's close to the line but never actually touches it
So how are they saying that y=0 ?
it's saying the vertical asymptote is found where the denominator is 0
Oh ok I get that and I guess they sub in x=2 because that's when the denominator is 0 right ?
@cerulean root Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cerulean root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a shorthand for $X_1 \times X_2 \times ... \times X_n$ where $X_i$ is a set?
Improv
$\prod_{i=1}^n X_i$ is sometimes used
Denascite
$\times X_i$
Samuel
Closed by @serene bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have a general question: i'm working with a 3d shape assignment and thus with linear algebra and geometry. I am applying a translation so that the barycenter of the shape coincides with the origin of the coordinate system. Thereafter I am scaling it so that "it fits inside the unit cube"