#help-13
1 messages · Page 166 of 1
Closed by @teal magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the topic is factoring perfect square trinomials and I'm learning it from a ppt. What happened to 20ab?
x^2 + 2xy + y^2 = (x + y)^2
in this case, 20ab is the 2xy
4a^2 = (2a)^2, 25b^2 = (5b)^2 and 20ab = 2*(2a)*(2b), so overall it's equal to
(2a)^2 + 2*(2a)*(5b) + (5b)^2
= (2a + 5b)^2
Closed by @next spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
P(A_) with line above A is probability that A wont happen = 1 - P(A)
can you show the original question
Probability that family has Personal computer is event A, 0.53 . It has laptop (event B) = 0.42. It has both is 0.25
P(B|A) = 0.47 =/= P(B) = 0.42 which proves they are dependent
yeah
so question was
whats proability we pick a household that has no PC and no Laptop
so I assume its 1 - P(A) - P(B)
0.05
so if probability of having computer was 0.5 and laptop 0.5 as well, would the probability of having no PC and no Laptop be 1-0.5-0.5 = 0?
Try something different, since this doesnt work well
No, see my point above? If the probabilites were 0.5 and 0.5, then it would be impossible to not have laptop and not have PC
Try calculating P(not A) and P(not B)
then P((not A) and (not B))
and keep in mind they are not independent
so you cant just multiply them
It was just a random example showing that your calculation method doesnt make sense
because if 50% of families have computer and 50% have laptop, then it's not true that 100% - 50% - 50% = 0% have nor computer, nor laptop
Just try doing this instead
try using venn diagrams
Just fill out the missing areas, alternatively you can use inclusion exclusion
@spring coyote Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is what I've done so far to solve this question...
I need help with part C (without giving the answer), and i've also posted how I got the ans. to part A and B
By the way
_--------
when you measure the distance between a point and a plane, you want to measure perpendicular to the plane
right, and taking that into consideration
what i've thought of is
point P is given, so i can make a vector equation of line passing through it
with direction vector as coefficients of the cartesian form of the plane equation
and then i find the intersection by substituting the line into the plane equation.
i then take the distance between the 2 points
but there's a little problem
Since the coordinates of point P is given as x_0, y_0 and z_0
it will make me waste a full page or something
i want to do it in a shorter way if possible
you could normalise the direction vector so that the parameter is exactly the distance travelled
then start from P and see how large you need to make the parameter until you hit the plane
but your orginal way works
so i take the unit vector ?
yeah
divide by its magnitude 3?
so you mean i try for different values of the parameter?
hmmmmmmmmmm
okkkkk
ill give it a try just cause i've never done this, even if it is slower
oh, i shouldve asked earlier, how will i know when i reach the plane?
since P is given as unknown constants
it reaches the plane when the three components of the vector satisfy the plane equation
I didn't mean to literally vary t, because P is in unknowns, as you say
but you can plug in the points into the plane equation
so 2(x0 + t2/3) - 2(y0 - t2/3) + 1(z0 + t/3) = 0
and solve for t in terms of x0, y0, and z0
ok. And the absolute value symbols, i need to argue with words saying distance is an absolute measure?
to justify it being equal to the given expression
yeah
remember that t is positive in the direction of (2,-2,1)
so if the plane is on the other side of P than that direction
that'll give a negative displacement
isn't it the other way around?
but i get the point anyway
it's P + t(2,-2,1) right?
it'll be positive in the direction of (2,-2,1)
since that's the direction the vector goes as you increase t
ah right
ok, this approach is much better. Really i should stop and visualize myself but i dont have the time rn 😭
thanks @stiff totem !
.close
Closed by @paper gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find the intersection of sin2x=cot2x?
If you multiply both sides by sin(2x) and use a certain trig identity, the equation turns into a quadratic in cos(2x)
sin^2(2x)=cos2x?
Yes
sin^2(2x)=1-2sin^2(x)
No, you are confusing it with cos(2x) = 1 - 2sin^2(x)
Replace sin^2(2x) with 1 - cos^2(2x)
And move everything to one side
What do you get?
+cos2x *
Yeah
Before solving this, would be nice to check if the quadratic has any solutions at all
Try computing the discriminant
Ah it's positive
5?
Discriminant is 5 yeah, so there may be two solutions to this
Try solving the quadratic equation now
so cos2x=(-1+sqrt5)/2 or (-1-sqrt5)/2
then i go 2x=cos^-1((-1+sqrt5)/2) or cos^-1(-1-sqrt5)/2?
but it asks for a point of intersection
after i get my two x values i can compute in using one of the functions? either one should work since they are intersecting
thus i get my x and y coords
.close
Closed by @steady wind
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Original Message Deleted
You deleted your original post. The channel will abruptly close and possibly lock. (This is irreversible).
Please claim a new channel and do NOT delete the first message of any future channel you claim.
the answer is A, you first sub in x=-1 and x=2 to get 2, we know that they intersect at these points so these coordinates also represent points on line l so you just make a linear equation
and then you found out that m=-2, answer A
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
oh you aint a helper
Mb sorry
it applies to everyone not just peolpe with the helper role
the role just subscribes you to a pingstorm
"helper" as in "anybody who helps" not "person bearing the Helper" role
you may notice i lack it
this is on purpose
Thanks btw
i am getting crapped on rn for helping someone smh
that aint a bannable word right
you are not being crapped on.
nor shit on, nor wailed on, etc.
you are simply being reminded of how things work around here.
It’s just warning
you just stabbed me in the back
Man I just asked a question it’s your choice that you told me the answer
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
get your head outta ur bum, i was being nice, no need to be an ass
I wasn’t being mean, I did what I supposed to do
Alr let’s end this argument
Close this channel btw
.close
Closed by @native lagoon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
pce
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a line is inclined at theta degrees to the x-z plane
and at phi degrees to the x-y plane
if you are positioned somewhere along +z, looking in the negative z direction
how long does the line appear, if its actual length was 'a'
i thought the apparent length might be sqrt[ (sin(theta) * a)^2 + (sin(phi) * cos(theta) * a)^2 ] but that doesn't seem to be right
.close
Closed by @wheat moss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
will the ping work when you edit it?
они покажут путь <@&268886789983436800>
Closed by @wanton sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
banned them anyways
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk how to do this
Do you know what is mean defined as?
yes
What's that?
Average is just sum of all observations divided by number of observation. Right?
Right.
So, aren't you already given summation of observation?
idk what is w
No. That's number of observation.
n=summation of f
n always denotes number of observation/number of data points/sum of frequencies.
yes
If f is frequency, only then.
yes f is that
you are also given summation of f(x).
where
What do you think $\sum {z}$ is ?
summation of random something
Enemagneto
Not random something. 🤦♂️
What is z in your question ?
It's summation of z values.
wind speed
Really?
What do you make of Z = (W-3)/2 ?
Yes, so it's a metric defined for wind values.
For example, we can say that Temperature of any day is z, where z = (w-3)/2
Similarly, z is any metric.
Its exact name doesn't matter.
Yes. So, for every wind speed w, z is defined via the formula given.
how will I understand it if the case was different
Different how?
What's your issue with this question ?
Im newer to this type of questions anyway so fx is z
then was is fx^2
and it said coded data
to calculate sigma
Coded in the sense that you can assume z to be an encoding function. Basically, whenever you give a w value to your function, it returns a z value which is just like a coded version of w-value.
As, for every w-value, there is a unique z value.
That's what they meant. z value is being obtained from w-values using the z definition.
Let's say w=3
For this, we have z = (w-3)/2 = (3-3)/2 = 0
So, z=0 is just a coded value of w=3.
You won't get z as 0 for any other w value.
we do trial and error?
Also, given a z, you can always go back and find w value.
No. Why would we do that?
I'm just trying to explain via example.
ok so i calculated mean
I was explaining what encoding means.
oh
Now, since n is 31, you have thirty one values of w.
how 13
13
ok
makes sense?
so put 31 in w>?
so what is the value of w
Something like this:
Day Wind speed
1 5
2 12
3 9
.
.
.
30 17
31 4
Values are only exemplary.
THEY AREN'T ACTUAL VALUES IN YOUR QUESTION.
idk how the wind speed will be from day 1 to day 31
cant even average because idk the values
Also, i have given an example.
They don't necessarily have to be day wise even.
They might be 31 readings taken 5 minutes apart.
Or anything for that matter.
I just gave you an example.
Firstly, to ensure that you understood all that i said - Calculate z value when w = 9.
sigma=root over varaince
yes
Calculate z value when w = 9.
3
106/31
It signifies summation.
Oh. That sigma.
yes that
Enemagneto
idk what is this
It also represents standard deviation, I think.
I have only seen S or SD usually though.
what is Szz
Let me confirm. a moment.
Ah. It's standard deviation only.
So, you have standard deviation for z.
That's all you need to solve it for w now.
S stands for SD only. 🤦♂️
You shouldn't be so recalcitrant about your terminology. Statistics has bunch of different terminology for same stuff.
Lol. No
what is Szz and Sz
Okay. Alright. New development - S is standard deviation. But Sz and Szz might be different. I'm unable to find anything substantial on internet.
I hate Statistics
They aren't sure either.
@carmine hare Tell me what you think it is. We can move ahead with that one.
So Szz is sum of squares of (Zi -Zmean) ?
n is 31
Let me know when you are done.
So, to find mean of w, we need $\sum w$.
Enemagneto
We have $\sum z$.
Enemagneto
$$\sum z$$ $$=\sum \frac{w-3}{2}$$
$$= \sum \frac{w}{2} - \sum\frac{3}{2}$$
Enemagneto
@carmine hare That should be enough to work it out. Try
I dont understand
Which part?
this
interms of w
oh ik summation of z
wait
can you cacel sigma?
What do you mean by "cancel sigma"?
I just put value of z from the function.
idk but Sigma w/2 - sigma 3/2 = 106
Yes. That's correct.
Now, just simplify to find $\sum w$.
now there is sigma
Enemagneto
I have to go. Be back in 5 minutes roughly.
how to simplify this
Well, firstly, $\sum \frac{w}{2} = \frac{1}{2}\sum w$.
Enemagneto
You don't need to remove the sigma for w one. You need the value of Sigma(w).
To find mean.
For the $\sum (3/2)$, use definition of sigma.
Enemagneto
@carmine hare Has your question been resolved?
@carmine hare Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I prove its injective
Hey calc
As was said, this is basically impossible to do it this way
You want to show that N×N is countable, and so every equivalence relation over N is countable
Is there no other way because Ann was helpin me earlier with that and it seemed so confusing
wait
I just prove that N x N is countable?
and thats good enoiugh?
An equivalence relation is a subset of N×N, and so if you prove that N×N is countable, the proof is over
There's an easy diagonal method to show that the Cartesian product of any two countable sets is countable
I'm trying to look it up atm
Yes, but here's a more rigorous proof
But you've likely covered it in class
ye we did the diagnol thing to prove that |(0, 1)| = |R|
Different diagonal proof lol
If you do the 'diagonal argument', you still have to construct the function which is complicated to show. However, consider $f:\begin{cases}\bN × \bN \longrightarrow \bN \ (m,n) \longmapsto 2^m(2n+1) - 1 \end{cases}$
There's a few ig
rafilou2003
Could I like list all of the pairs in a way where the nth pair contains all the pairs whos elements summed up return n
wait no fuck that wont work because 0 isnt a natural
how did u come up
wit
2^m(2n + 1) - 1
oh wait could I
Oh is 0 not a natural integer for you ? You poor thing
(you also have to show that an equivalence relation on N cant be a finite set)
do this but where the sum of them returns n + 1
ye not in this course
but this is what im thinking
lets say
Okay so :
Consider $f:\begin{cases}\bN × \bN \longrightarrow \bN \ (m,n) \longmapsto 2^{m-1}(2n-1)\end{cases}$
This is my argument, but applied to fractions. It's easy to change this to N×N though
rafilou2003
1st pair = (1, 1) => 1 + 1 = 2
2nd pair = (1, 2), (2, 1) => 1 + 2 = 3
3rd pair = (1, 3), (3, 1), (2, 2) => 1 + 3 = 4 and 2 + 2 = 4
..
uptil n
where the nth will contain pairs that sum upto n + 1
wait is that even right
I dont get how u came up with that doe
2^(m - 1)(2n -1)
of what
Yeah this is factoring by 2 as much as possible
For every natural integer, you take the biggest power of 2 that divides it
So you can write this power of 2 as 2^(m-1)
And what you're left with has to be an odd number, which can be written as 2n - 1
Also, if you want another bijection that relies on this technique you used by regrouping all couples that have the same sum :
$f:\begin{cases}\bN × \bN \longrightarrow \bN \ (m,n) \longmapsto \frac{(n+m-2)(n+m-1)}{2} + n \end{cases}$
rafilou2003
ah
Oops I made a small mistake in the function
I'll rewrite this second one in a few moment
Yes the first one I know works
and now I prove that its bijective right
Yes
It's definitely good to get a few ways to prove this. I disagree that mine is not rigorous, and I personally believe that the function is trivial to create with my method.
Just can't be written in a f(x) = ... manner, which is not important to the proof
It can be written, here it is
With the diagonal argument, I mean
Yeah this is the diagonal argument It's not quite the same as this but you just reverse everything so that every diagonal is read from left to right
Or keep it the same as that haha
but how would I use the diagnol in my proof like do I just draw that out and say that every pair could be counted starting at (1, 2) then (1, 2) then (2, 1) then (1, 3) then (2, 2) and then (3, 1) ....
This is where some profs will not like the drawing of the diagonal argument as proof
Imo, your class has already proven that the Cartesian product of any two countable sets is countable, and probably used the diagonal argument to prove it
oh wait lol I j remebered we could use anything thats proved in class for free
I know that a lot of profs don't like the diagonal argument without an explicit bijection because I made an entire course on set theory and countability and my "supervisor" specifically told me not to allow proofs by drawing 
so if this question was to appear on my tests i could just say that since we know cartesian product of two sets is countable then N x N is countable n done lol
Mind you, I am not in your class so I can't be SURE this happened
ye ik but i remember we proved it
also rafilou how would I prove the surjectivity
Im stuck on that
The surjectivity is not that important, but if you want it : just remember that for a natural integer N, the set ${m\in \bN, 2^{m-1}|N}$ is bounded
Latex bot has failed us :(
I'll copy and paste it again, hopefully latex bot will wake u0
also one more thing
after proving that
N x N is countable
how would I relate it to the question
it's because there's a space before the last $
that |e_1| = |e_2|
rafilou2003
Thanks
Ok so after saying that N×N is countable, the next step is to show that an equivalence relation over N is infinite
After that, since an equivalence relation is a subset of N×N, it will be countable
wth how do I prove that
Ive never seen anything like that in my book
Use one of the properties of equivalence relations :)
If you wanna guess, you have 1 chance out of 3 to get it right
Yes!
how so
Can you tell me what reflexivity is over $E_1 \subseteq \bN^2$?
rafilou2003
(a, a) in E_1 => (a, a) in N^2 ?
and N is infinite so its infinite?
Yes
Yes
If you're interested in similar exercises over countability, I can hand you over my exercise sheet
yes pls
Alr I'll hand it to you in DMs
Closed by @limber snow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
(Already Answered in DMs)
@limber snow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @limber snow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So this is a solution my prof posted on an example about the summation of series. I can follow what he does fine until the middle section where he plugs in the values of n but its divided by 2.
We're supposed to use this formula but its divided by 6 instead of 2. And why is the 2x10 turned into 200?
I've been trying to understand where I went wrong but the more I think about it, the more I want to say he made an error
The summation of k from k = 1 to n is n(n + 1)/2, so they might have mixed up those two in terms of the denominator
That makes sense. And how would u explain the 2x10 turning into 200?
My best bet is that your professor was tired when doing the calculations
Closed by @calm totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this a proper evolution? or did i mess a step up.
2(x^2 +4x -12) = 0
2(x^2 +4x + (4/2)^2 - 12) - 8 = 0
i am trying to make it into vector form
evolution?
vector form?
.close
Closed by @wanton sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
(user got muted)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sorry im copyrighting lolmao
Closed by @oblique raven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What
.close
Closed by @hoary chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with an inference question
@mild carbon Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey i need help for something idk if this is the right channel for that but the question goes like this, find a problem in your day-to-day life that you can solve For example,
suppose you are coordinating a youth group event to make sub sandwiches to sell as a fundraiser. You might have tuna subs, regular subs, and vegetarian subs. Some of the
ingredients will be used in several or all three types, while other ingredients will be unique to one kind of sub. use set theory to think through how many portions of each ingredient you
will need.
Uh I'm not sure if set theory is the thing you want here
instructions that conflict with the problem 🤡
"use a hammer to dig out a hole in the ground"
wtf
@exotic tartan Has your question been resolved?
@exotic tartan Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the answer right ?
seems right
@rotund vigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The angle of depression from the top of a 20m building to a worker standing on the ground below is 40 degreees. Find the distance of the worker from the base of the building to 2 decimal places
I'm so confused, how would i work out the distance from base to worker?
Draw a figure first
We assume the worker is a point
Because the worker is clearly not significantly tall compared to the building
ok but then it says find the distance of the worker from the BASE of the building? how does that make sense?
nvm i figured it out thx for ur help anyway!
!close
.close
Closed by @iron dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is the number of deleted rows and columns deleted from the original matrix to obtain the minor M k
shouldnt the minor M be a kxk matrix
because it is obtained by choosing k rows and k columns then the elements consisting these rows and columns will be the elements of the minor M
Yeah so it’s a mistake
Go ahead
how is rotating 180 deg about principle diagonal change the angle with the row from $\alpha$ to $90-\alpha$
calculus is fun
No idea, I don’t think transposition is a rotation at all, in my mind it’s a reflection
the x-axis is the row the grey line is the principle axis of equaton y=-x the red line is th segment joining 2 elements of the matrix anf the brown segment is the result of rotation
is this rotation correct ?
I don’t know, sorry I can’t help you, I just don’t think transposition is a rotation at all. To me it’s like reflection by the line y=-x
oh ok but i mean if i am willing to just rotate the red segment 180 deg about y=-x in general will the result of rotation be the brown segment ?
I understand rotation by an angle. I have no idea what rotation about a line means
Closed by @dim tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i want to ask some prob v basic questions about factorization in hope that it can make me do it more intuitively
$x^4 + 3x^3 + 2x^2 = x^2(x^2 + 3x + 2)$
marty
$x^4 + 3x^3 + 2^2 = x^2(x^2 + 3x) + 2^2$ ?
marty
*yes but that doesn't get you anywhere
no, the idea is that if 2x^2 instead was 2^2
There's no x^2 term
and thus x^2 is no longer a common factor of 2x^2
is it then no longer possible to factor at all
so to factor, the common factor needs to apply to all terms of the polynomial
We'd be unsure of that
unsure if it is possible to factor?
yes so you effectively try to factor by 1 which is obv the same as it was
because 1 is the only common factor
of all the terms
well just because all terms dont have a common factor does not mean it isnt factorable
Yeah sorry I was hit with a lagspike
and to investigate if it is factorable you do what?
you hope and pray
and throw in a few small integers
mostly just visually obvious, or yeah sub in some numbers which equate that to 0
usually integers or else too tedious
If you have something like $x^6 - 3x^3 +2$ you can sub $x^3 = y$ and continue factoring
NEON
y^2 - 3y + 2
right
marty
still
You know how to factorize a quadratic surely
2 has no common factors
oh
shit
yeah
okay
yes i know but this is the type of stuff i dont think about doing
how did you think of that, i want to understand better
NEON
This is still factorable
It's just noticing the powers you'll get used to it
Note how the sum of the coefficients is 0
It implies y - 1 is a factor
which means you can long divide
i would not think of that
and why
it's the first thing you should do when working with powers higher than 2
Well substitute y = 1 and see what happens
For a polynomial $P(x)$, the remainder upon dividing by $x - r$ is $P(r)$, by the remainder theorem, if this remainder is 0, i.e. $P(r) = 0$, it implies that $r$ is a root of $P(x)$.
NEON
Which means it can be expressed as $(x - r)Q(x)$ for some polynomial $Q(x)$ which can be found using long division.
NEON
add and subtract y^2 works too
2y^2 I think
there are many things here i need to intuitively understand, even when you say long division i need to make sure i know 100% what you mean by that
Polynomial division?
Synthetic division?
This video tutorial explains how to perform long division of polynomials with remainder and with missing terms. It's explains how to do long division easily and it provides the step by step process to get it done. Basically, there are 3 steps that you have to repeat. 1. Divide 2. Multiply 3. Subtract This video contains plenty of ex...
lol
If it hasn't been taught to you, then you can safely ignore everything after this point
I explained it since you said you wanted methods of factorization
the extent of my knowledge is apparently "look for common factors, if none, don't factorize". And factorizing quadratics ik how to do mostly, but i never think of it
but for this example
i was trying to do it while we spoke and i couldn't get it right first try. I tried with
$(y-1)(y^2+2)$
marty
but thats wrong
we want to get y^3 and 3y and 2. How can i think of this to solve quickly
try adding and subtracting y^2 and it becomes quite straightforward
what do you mean by that exactly
adding y^2 to this?
adding and subtracting the same term has no effect on the equation, but it may help you in factorization
i still cant see it
marty
rearrange it and split -3y into -y and -2y
$$y^3-y^2+y^2-y-2y+2$$
dimpledoink
@keen nova Has your question been resolved?
theres some knowledge im lacking because still i cant see
i dont see a common factor of 1 term, so obviously it has to be of at least 2 terms. But idk how to look for that
should i do polynomial division of y + 2?
you can either do y-1 or y+2
so
the strategy is to find the common factor aside from the constant/non-factorable term, then add the non-factorable term
so y is the common factor, plus 2, the non-factorable term
then do long division
ok that doesnt always work
ok well
at least i managed to do it now
so long division is cool
i never did it before
do you have any tips in finding what polynomial to divide with
once you have something that looks like this you can try and start "pairing" the terms
like y^3-y^2 is one pair, y^2-y is another, and -2y+2 is another
then you take the common factors out which here would be y^2 in the first pair, y in the second and -2 in the third (not +2)
and you end up with something like this $$y^2(y-1)+y(y-1)-2(y-1)$$
$$y^2(y-1)+y(y-1)-2(y-1)$$
dimpledoink
now the pairing is not always going to work out, and if it doesnt, try rearranging and splitting terms in different ways
you'd ask why -2 and not +2, and that's because we need the same terms in the parentheses so we can divide by the same term
if you took +2 as the common factor in the last pair you would've ended up with something like
$$y^2(y-1)+y(y-1)+2(1-y)$$
dimpledoink
after this just divide by y-1, and you get a normal quadratic equation which is easily factorized
for these type of examples its v easy, ik 12 is a sum and 32 is a product, so find compatible numbers
so when i hear "how to factorize a quadratic" this is what i imagine
can i relate this somehow with what you're now saying
have you been taught the quadratic formula yet
ok that's the easiest way to factorize a quadratic
use the quadratic formula and find the roots
whatever the roots are, you flip the sign
for example, in the above example, the roots will be 8 and 4
and then you flip the sign and get -8 and -4
and then add x to both and get x-8 and x-4
essentially reverse engineer the factors using the roots, normally you'd find the factors of the quadratic, equate each of them to zero, and then find the roots
Closed by @keen nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve this?
what does $n = 2x - 13$ have to do with the line above?
Ann
as far as i can read, the top line says: $$(h^{-1} \circ h)(b) = ; ?$$ please confirm whether i have read it correctly
Ann
Well, what do you know about functions composed with their reciprocal
yes, a function and its inverse cancel out like that (kind of by definition)
I think you have a sign error on h^-1 though
@plucky barn Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @plucky barn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
1
have you tried computing directional derivatives ?
yes
but the function at 0,0 is just 0
yes but the directional derivative might not be 0
have you tried computing the derivative with $y = \lambda x$ ?
teh gradient vector would be (0,0)?
rafilou2003
what?
the gradient is not 0 I think
what do you get when you differentiate 0?
aight, bet with a counterexample
the partial derivative would just be 0
Let $g(x) = x$ the function over the real numbers $\bR$
rafilou2003
$g(0) = 0$ right ?
rafilou2003
yeah
what about $g'(0)$ ?
rafilou2003
may or may not be 0
rafilou2003
how?
what's the derivative of x
1
but how do you know that the function is g(x) = x
because I created it that way to show you a counterexample
So f(x,y) = 0 doesn't imply the gradient is 0
i see
so what can i do here?
The way the directional derivative works, is that if you want for example a derivative along the vector (1,2), then you let (x,y) = (1t, 2t) and you compute f'(t)
so in our example :
if we have $(x,y) = (1t, 2t)$, then f(x,y) = ...
rafilou2003
$\frac{2t^3}{t^2+16t^4}$
Bedsheat
?
you got it!
And then to find the directional derivative from the vector (1,2), you just differentiate that
would the derivitive of that be $\frac{2-32t^2}{1+256t^2}$
Bedsheat
you're differentiating a quotient
yeah i used the quotient rule
then cancled out t^4
at the denominator I think is (1+16t^2)^2
but the denominator is t^2+16t^4
did you cancel it out?
at the start?
rafilou2003
i see i did that before differentiating
differentiates into $\frac{2 + 32t^2 - 64t^2}{(1+16t^2)^2} = \frac{2-32t^2}{(1+16t^2)^2}$
should it not be -32t and not -32t^2
Oh lemme correct that
rafilou2003
because -2t * 32t
right
This is well defined in 0 and values 2, so $D_{(1,2)}f(0,0) = 2$
rafilou2003
rafilou2003
and not 2t^3
but it's alright, the derivative is just multiplied by 2
and so $D_{(1,2)}f(0,0) = 4$
rafilou2003
how
the function is xy^2
t*2t^2
ohhhhhh
right
bruh
i see
rafilou2003
we're still left to prove that in the general case
so now we just have to do the same thing but with $(x,y) = (u_1t,u_2t)$ with $(u_1,u_2)$ a unit vector as the question suggests
rafilou2003
Now that we know exactly what to do (and we've done it before) it should go faster
So what's $f(u_1t,u_2t)$ ?
rafilou2003
lemme do it
I'll be away for the next 10 mins, if you're stuck sometime in between you can ping helpers
k thx!
$f(u_1t,u_2t)=\frac{u_1u_2^2t^3}{u_1^2t^2+u_2^4t^4}$
Bedsheat
$f'(u_1t,u_2t)=\frac{-u_1^3u_2^2-2u_1u_2^6t^2}{(u_1^2+u_2^$t^2)^2}$
Bedsheat
idk i messed up somewhere
i think its $\frac{u_1^3u_2^2-u_1u_2^6t^2}{(u_1^2 + u_2^4t^2)^2}$
the denominator should be $(u_1^2 + u_2^4t^2)^2$
rafilou2003
okay i think this time im correct
it is tho isnt it?
ho wait
(a+b)^2 ?
its whole square
yes
this is not the first time I see someone writing (a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 so I don't judge ;)
Bedsheat
sure is
almost
bruhhhh
0,0
its not defined at the point 0
so let's assume $u_1 \neq 0$
rafilou2003
in that case, what is $D_{(u_1,u_2)}f(0,0)$?
rafilou2003
$\frac{u_1^3u_2^2}{u_1^4} = \frac{u_2^2}{u_1}$
yes, and simplified ?
Bedsheat
👍
phew
Alright so which ones do we now know is true/false ?
I'll just do this for myself
alr
"the maximum of directional derivatives occurs in the direction of the vector (5,5)"
yes there is no maximum !
can you see why?
yeah i can
the higher u_2 and closer to 0 u_1 is the more the value of hte directional derivitive
yes that's kinda the idea
though you do have to be careful, since $(u_1,u_2)$ is a unit vector you have that $u_1^2 + u_2^2 = 1$
rafilou2003
ohhhhh
So while we can't make u_2 "bigger and bigger" as it's bounded by 1, we can make u_1 closer and closer to 0
alright, now left with the statement about tangent lines
@tidal wasp Has your question been resolved?
@tidal wasp Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tidal wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i identify the pivot columns
im confused because row 2 eliminates row 3 so im not sure if columns 2 and 3 count as pivot colums along with column 1
continue row reducing
right now you have a 2 along the diagonal
a zero row from row reduction tells you that one of your columns of your matrix is linearly dependent on the other two. i.e you will not have full rank, or full pivot columns (you won't have all 3)
oh okay
i didn't know that
im having trouble understanding why (1,2,0) is linearly dependent on (1,0,0) and (0,1,0)
<1,2,0>= 1 * <1,0,0> + 2 * <0,1,0>
it can be represented as a linear combination of the other two
ohhhh
therefore it is linearly dependent on them
but
that is not the take away you should be getting from your row reduction
yeah
which is in the first column
so column 1 is a pivot column
what is the pivot of row 2?
i wanna say 2
yes
2 is the first nonzero element in row 2
so it is the pivot
and 2 is in which column?
second column
oh
this makes a lot of sense now
so im also asked to find the column and row space
the column space, is the space spanned by the columns
do you know what I mean by "spanned"?
yeah it means a set in which the vectors are linear combos of each other
