#help-10

1 messages · Page 458 of 1

toxic harbor
#

yeh but how do i find it

gaunt current
#

Now That's wrong

toxic harbor
#

well good thing u finally told me

gaunt current
#

$4\sqrt{2}x -10\sqrt{2} = x+3$

toxic harbor
#

let me fix it

warm shaleBOT
#

Coder decoder

gaunt current
#

$(4\sqrt{2}-1)x = 3+10\sqrt{2}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Coder decoder

gaunt current
#

Now you have to rationalise

#

I'll leave the rest to you

toxic harbor
gaunt current
#

Yes

toxic harbor
gaunt current
#

Solve for x an you get an answer multiply and divide that answer by the conjugate of the denominator

toxic harbor
#

can u belive idk what does conjuate mean

gaunt current
#

Conjugate of$ a+\sqrt{b} = a-\sqrt{b}$. Its ok

toxic harbor
#

$a+\sqrt{b} \is\ a-\sqrt{b}$

gilded drift
#

if that makes sense

#

since (a-b)(a+b)=a^2-b^2

toxic harbor
#

so the opposite

gaunt current
#

Yes not exactly but

#

Opposite is like $a+b
,,-a-b$

toxic harbor
warm shaleBOT
#

Coder decoder

toxic harbor
#

i mean opposite signs

#

oppositeof + is -

#

opposite of / is *

gaunt current
#

a has a + as well it is $+a+b$

warm shaleBOT
#

Coder decoder

toxic harbor
#

isnt that just the opposite sign

gaunt current
#

a+b as a whole has a +

toxic harbor
#

-a-b is the opposite

gaunt current
#

Yes and a-b is the conjugate

#

Or b-a is conjugate

toxic harbor
#

lemme just see if theres a diff word we use here in AUS

#

opposite of the sign of the middle term

gaunt current
#

Australia? Do you use Americans or British English

toxic harbor
#

upgraded british

gaunt current
#

On then you call it conjugate its a standard mathematical term

#

Even Americans call it conjugate

toxic harbor
#

one sec lemme show u what i think it means

#

right?

gaunt current
#

Thats conjugate

toxic harbor
#

yes

#

!!!

#

i was low key confused i was like where did conjuction come from??

gaunt current
#

Nowhere it's a typo

toxic harbor
#

lol

toxic harbor
#

do i do 2sqrt2 x-x?

gaunt current
#

Divide by $(4\sqrt{2}-1)$

warm shaleBOT
#

Coder decoder

gaunt current
toxic harbor
gaunt current
#

You need to divide both sides by say c and cx= b. Then writing ax+dx= b is not helpful

toxic harbor
#

i am very confused

gaunt current
#

It'll make it worse

#

Leave it divide by 4√2-1

toxic harbor
#

why do i divide i see no reason to

gaunt current
#

To find x

toxic harbor
#

umean to get rid of x i need to divide?

gaunt current
#

(4√2-1) x = 3+ 10√2

toxic harbor
#

i see no equal sign

#

do i just spawn one in?

gaunt current
#

The last step you forgot to equate to zero

toxic harbor
#

ohh i think i get it

gaunt current
#

You do what I said at 2nd last

#

I think I made a typo 4√2-10

toxic harbor
#

uhh i dont think i get it

gaunt current
#

Move 3 to rhs

toxic harbor
#

ok

gaunt current
#

I think an error

toxic harbor
#

i see the error

#

do we need more helpers

gaunt current
#

Something is wrong

#

Wait it is (4√2-1/x = 3+10√2

#

Now divide by 4√2-1

toxic harbor
gaunt current
#

4√2x -x taking x common

gaunt current
#

Try pinging some helpers

toxic harbor
#

this is how im feelin rn

#

<@&286206848099549185>

gaunt current
#

Sorry

toxic harbor
#

we all make mistakes

gaunt current
#

I tried to help. But I had to teach you concepts from scratch

toxic harbor
#

all good

#

i do have the solution

#

wanna see it?

gaunt current
#

Anyway I think that x = (4√2-1)/(10√2+3)

gaunt current
toxic harbor
#

we werent even close

gaunt current
#

I think Mercury made an error

toxic harbor
#

we all do

gaunt current
#

,w (4√2-1)/(3+10√2)

gaunt current
#

,w 8+ (11/2)*√2

toxic harbor
#

why am i so stupid

gaunt current
#

Same for me

#

Am I stupid

toxic harbor
#

were stupid

gaunt current
toxic harbor
#

11

#

lets say i forget alot

gaunt current
#

Ok. Then let's retry. I think you said to me that you don't want to use sin 45 is the problem

#

It is 1/√2

#

And sin 30 is 1/2

toxic harbor
#

i can do that with a calc not in my brain

gaunt current
#

They're values that are supposed to be remembered in 10th I presume

#

I've them affixed in my brain

#

Just like the formula of water is in my brain

toxic harbor
#

i wasnt in 10 methods, i was in 10 general

#

rn im in 11 methods

gaunt current
#

Whats that

toxic harbor
#

methods is stage 3
general is stage 2

gaunt current
#

We've mathematics standard and basic here

toxic harbor
#

let me ask a class mate

gaunt current
#

Good idea

#

Bye

toxic harbor
#

cya

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @toxic harbor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

edgy needle
#

how would i read thsi

obtuse pebbleBOT
edgy needle
#

i have 0.75 and then do i just find when both of them line up?

olive oxide
#

first check vernier scale reading

#

what is the first vernier scale division coinciding with the main scale?

edgy needle
#

i think like

#

here

olive oxide
# edgy needle

hmmm close but i would take the one just 2 to its left

#

like 2.7

edgy needle
#

hmm oki

#

wat do we do with this info

slate island
#

I think it's an physics question

olive oxide
#

do u know the least count of the vernier?

olive oxide
# edgy needle

since it coincided on 2.7 it is the 27th vernier scale coinciding

#

so

#

we get Vernier Scale Reading= 27x Least Count of Vernier Scale

edgy needle
#

so just 0.01 x 27?

#

oh and i add it to the 7.5?

olive oxide
#

yep

edgy needle
#

sry i did 0.75 instead of 7.5

#

oh ok

#

thanks so much

olive oxide
#

7.5+ 27x0.01

#

=7.77

#

!done

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close

olive oxide
olive oxide
obtuse pebbleBOT
edgy needle
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @edgy needle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

edgy needle
#

.reopen

obtuse pebbleBOT
edgy needle
#

is this 1.35

#

im getting confused because of the 5 on the left

olive oxide
#

yepp its 1.35

#

that 5 is there for when there is a positive zero error

edgy needle
#

whats the 15 for on the right?

olive oxide
#

<@&268886789983436800>

olive oxide
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@edgy needle Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

desert pulsar
#

Can someone help me visualise the difference between multiplying something by two and squaring it?

Like is there anyway I can visually see the difference between 2r and r^2? I know they're not the same.

versed stratus
#

,w graph 2x and x^2

desert pulsar
#

thanks

stoic breach
desert pulsar
#

Thanks guys, i think my doubt is pretty much cleared now.

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @desert pulsar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

stoic breach
#

No problem.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

distant dawn
obtuse pebbleBOT
distant dawn
#

I am stuck in both

#

In second one I got a condition

$$1+q=\frac{3p-2}{4p-3}$$

warm shaleBOT
#

Double_mytrouble

distant dawn
#

after this I am unable to solve

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@distant dawn Has your question been resolved?

distant dawn
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

<@&286206848099549185>

restive gorge
#

Double the ping

distant dawn
restive gorge
#

I took a look but it's out of my scope

restive gorge
distant dawn
#

then simplified third row to y(1+q)=1

#

then replaced y

restive gorge
#

How does that constraint guarantee exactly one solution

#

I'd row reduce but it seems painful

distant dawn
#

idk where to use that

#

3p not equal to 2 is enough in itself that there is unique sol

#

idk why it is mentioned exclusively again

restive gorge
#

,w p^2x^2+4y^2+4pxy=6px+12y-9 and x^2+9y^2+6xy=8x+24y-16 and px^2+3y^2+3xy=3x+1-(q-3)y

restive gorge
#

are p and q real numbers or integers

#

[ prpl begin{cases} p^2x^2+4y^2+4pxy &= 6px+12y-9 \ x^2+9y^2+6xy &= 8x+24y-16 \ px^2+3y^2+3xy &= 3x+1-(q-3)y end{cases} ]

warm shaleBOT
restive gorge
#

seems like you get some perfect squares

#

(px+2y)² and (x+3y)² at least

distant dawn
#

yeah

#

first two equation

restive gorge
#

Yeah no clue, where is this problem from?

distant dawn
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@distant dawn Has your question been resolved?

distant dawn
#

<@&286206848099549185>

regal hazel
distant dawn
#

32

#

31 I got it

#

after a hour

gilded sail
#

[ begin{cases} (px + 2y + 3 )^2 &= 0 \
(x + 3y + 4)^2 &= 0\
px^2+ 3 (y^2+ xy - x) + (q-3) y - 1 &= 0 end{cases} ]
From first and second equations we have
[ (3p - 2) x + 1 = 0 ]

#

why

distant dawn
#

你好.

gilded sail
#

I'm bad at dc latex

distant dawn
gilded sail
#

nihao

distant dawn
#

Did I write it correctly 😭

gilded sail
#

yes

distant dawn
#

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

gilded sail
#

(px + 2y + 3 )^2 &= 0
(x + 3y + 4)^2 &= 0
px^2+ 3 (y^2+ xy - x) + (q-3) y - 1 &= 0

From first and second equations we have
(3p - 2) x + 1 = 0

distant dawn
#

Just write it in a copy and send bro. It's not worth the hassle

gilded sail
#

lol

#

or maybe I just leave it like this

distant dawn
gilded sail
#

lemme continue

restive gorge
gilded sail
#

from first and second equation we have px = -2y - 3 and x = -3y - 4
we can sub into third equation
(-3y - 4) (-2y -3) + 3y^2 + 3(-3y-4)y - 3(-3y-4) -1 - (q-3)y = 0
(x,y) has unique solution if 3p \ne 2, means the discriminant is 0

#

ok I hate calculating it so left it for you

#

but here you should find what is q , then p is easy

restive gorge
#

It astounds me that we have essentially 4 variables and 3 equations anyway

restive gorge
restive gorge
#

this is linear not quadratic

gilded sail
#

it is of course quadratic, the left hand side is quadratic

#

having matrix does not means it is linear

#

I see

restive gorge
#

You also seem to have a sign error when you completted the squares

gilded sail
#

then you need to work together with the two lines above

#

yeah

#

,w simplify (-2y+3)(-3y+4)+ 3y^2 + 3y(-3y+4) - 3(-3y+4) + (q-3) y - 1

gilded sail
#

why is it linear anyway

restive gorge
gilded sail
#

hmm

#

ok it does missing something

distant dawn
restive gorge
#

,w gcd(3p-2,4p-3)

restive gorge
# warm shale **Double\_mytrouble**

Suppose p,q are integers. Then 1+q=(3p-2)/(4p-3) implies that (4p-3) | (3p-2) since 1+q is an integer. Now gcd(3p-2,4p-3)=1 so by Euclid (4p-3) | 1 => 4p-3 in {-1,1} so 4p-3=-1 <=> p=0.5 or 4p-3=1 <=> p=1

#

That's the only way I see it working out

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@distant dawn Has your question been resolved?

distant dawn
#

I am gonna close it ig. I will just ask sir

#

Thanks y'all for trying 🙏😄

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @distant dawn

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tulip dawn
#

Guys

obtuse pebbleBOT
tulip dawn
#

What’s 6 plus 7?

willow flax
digital hound
fiery olive
round nova
tulip dawn
#

Aight mb

#

I was js doing a dare

willow flax
tulip dawn
#

Got 10 bucks

willow flax
#

also close this

round nova
hardy widget
olive yew
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @olive yew

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

white pollen
#

Representing functions in power series

In blue was my first attempt, it got me +41
The red was an alternative path, where I differentiated before changed x-1 to 1-x, and in that I got that right answer by getting a -1 out

Did I miss a step in blue or is there a specific order of things I should be following?

white pollen
#

Nvm lol

#

Differentiating 1-x gives -1

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @white pollen

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fallen stag
#

How do you go about isolating y in $\log_y x = x$?

warm shaleBOT
gilded drift
#

change the base to something you'd like

fallen stag
#

Oh wait i figured it out

solar meadow
#

$a^b = c \iff \log_{a}{c} = b$

warm shaleBOT
#

Erebus

fallen stag
gilded drift
fallen stag
#

i dont remember learning that right expression

gilded drift
#

I was thinking too weirdly

fallen stag
#

figured it out tho

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fallen stag

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

clever mango
#

hi!! im learning about networks right now and im confused about question 3c

stoic breach
#

Which question, OP?

clever mango
#

like what does it mean “a new path of length 20m will be built in between the reptile exhibit and the giraffe exhibit” im so confused on the wording

clever mango
stoic breach
#

Would you mind justifying what were the answers you got for 3b, 3a?

#

Normally they would help to solve 3c.

clever mango
#

3a) entrance - p - s
45m
3b) entrance - l - t - m
110m

#

Lemme just double check that

clever mango
#

Lowk im js confused on where this reptile exhibit is

mystic folio
clever mango
#

Thats rlly it???

#

Do i add the entrance distance to the giraffe exhibit too??

mystic folio
#

Add to what?

clever mango
#

Like to the distance from the entrance to the monkey exhibition

#

wait im confused are we not starting from the entrance anymore🤨🤨

mystic folio
#

The question is simply asking if you can find a shorter path, aka either give an example of a shorter path or prove it can't exist

clever mango
#

OHH

#

OH

#

I got it now lowk

mystic folio
#

Oh also note that R only connects to cafe and G, so for all intents and purposes all we care now is that there's is a new path of length 55 from G to cafe

clever mango
#

Yess okok

#

So basically this path doesnt reduce the shortest distance its actually longer

#

OKAYY yess i got it tysm

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @clever mango

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

willow folio
#

my value of a+b+c = 3, but teacher's value is coming ±√3

willow folio
#

What have I done wrong?

hardy widget
#

I'm assuming you added the three equations to obtain this

willow folio
#

Yes

ember spade
#

hey @willow folio how are you?

hardy widget
willow folio
ember spade
#

let me explain

willow folio
ember spade
willow folio
ember spade
#

multiply
a(a-b)=1
b(b-c)=1
c(c-a)=1

#

by b, c, a

#

just for fun

hardy widget
warm shaleBOT
#

Civil Service Pigeon

hardy widget
#

But since the help channel is getting sniped, I'll let y'all have fun

ember spade
#

do you understand?

willow folio
ember spade
#

now add them up together

#

ab(a-b)+bc(b-c)+ca(c-a)=b+c+a

#

idk why but it may be helpful then

#

no now i see what to do

#

sum
a(a-b)=1
b(b-c)=1
c(c-a)=1

#

do you remember ab+bc+ca=0

#

now if sum
a(a-b) + b(b-c) + c(c-a) = 1 + 1 + 1

#

a² - ab + b² - bc + c² - ca = 3

#

a² + b² + c² -(ab + bc + ca) = 3

#

since ab+bc+ca=0

#

a² + b² + c² = 3

#

do you know formula (a + b)² = a² + 2ab + b²

#

now let's use it

#

(a + (b+c))² = a² + 2a(b+c) + (b+c)²

#

so
(a + b + c)² = a² + 2(ab + ca) + b² + 2bc + c²

#

_ _
(a + b + c)² = a² + b² + c² + 2(ab + bc + ca)

#

again, ab + bc + ca = 0

#

(a + b + c)² = a² + b² + c²

#

but we have (a + b + c)² = 3

#

@willow folio do you understand all that?

willow folio
willow folio
#

But what do I do with it?

ember spade
#

you have some value squared equal to 3

#

what do you think?

willow folio
#

How will I get a²+b²+c²

willow folio
#

Ahm

#

a²+b²+c² = 3

#

Then

ember spade
#

No

willow folio
#

Am I right?

willow folio
ember spade
#

do you understand how we got this

willow folio
#

ab + bc + ca = 0

#

Therefore

ember spade
#

and previous messages

stoic breach
ember spade
#

few previous messages

ember spade
#

ab + bc + ca = 0 in our case

stoic breach
#

Ah true.

#

In that case then you are correct.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@willow folio Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@willow folio Has your question been resolved?

willow folio
#

Thanks @ember spade! Now I am on next problem. I haven't completed this. But I think It's not necessary. I have extracted some thinking, and put my brain a lot already.

ember spade
#

im sorry to hear this

#

bad part is that you doing this because video

#

while i do it other way, which is not so helpful

willow folio
#

Please come to next channel

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @willow folio

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

ember spade
obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

forest wind
#

HELP HELP HELP

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

forest wind
mystic folio
#

You already had a help channel

digital path
tardy epoch
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@forest wind Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @forest wind

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

abstract sapphire
#

The page itself even tries to explain how to get the answered but with its wording I am failing to understand. It says to rewrite each term as it's product of primes (I assumed that meant factorization), so it shows how it can be done but the equation suddenly changes from the one shown to 8k^3+12k^2+20k.

There's more about this I don't understand but I'll start here.

wild glade
#

whats the GCF of the 3 numbers

surreal plover
wild glade
#

yes

abstract sapphire
#

Yeah I think that would still be true for the first one but it's weird

short crescent
short crescent
abstract sapphire
#

I understand the steps but am confused why the 4k and 32k changed to 12k and 20k. I'll take more pictures, hold on

wild glade
short crescent
#

? show what you mean

#

rewriting this as its product of primes should look something like the following

#

$2^3(k^3) + 2^2(k^2) + 2^5 (32)$

warm shaleBOT
abstract sapphire
#

Ok so the primes are still the same just the og is different?

wild glade
#

to show how it works

short crescent
#

that looks like a mistake or a different example

#

it's trying to tell you: here is a similar problem, now apply the same logic to the one you are given.

abstract sapphire
#

Ahhhh! Cool nevermind then lol.

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @abstract sapphire

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ebon pecan
#

What is the intution behind the Lagrange method for solving a PDE?

ebon pecan
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ebon pecan

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quasi escarp
#

I really need help with sequence and series pleaseee.... I am really bad in it 😭

quasi escarp
#

Shall I send the question ?

stoic breach
#

Please do.

quasi escarp
#

First can you guys explain me the topic... If you guys are free... Please...

#

It's called difference method...

stoic breach
#

Well, what have your teacher taught you about it?

quasi escarp
#

Wait lemme send...

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.

Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.

stoic breach
#

What's your thought, idea, or understand of it.

slender orchid
quasi escarp
inner sierra
#

we're here to help you with specific questions

quasi escarp
inner sierra
#

we can try to help you

quasi escarp
slender orchid
quasi escarp
#

The topic is up and question is down..

slender orchid
#

Think of it like that

quasi escarp
slender orchid
quasi escarp
quasi escarp
slender orchid
quasi escarp
slender orchid
#

Let's say we have a series of n terms

quasi escarp
slender orchid
#

We called it "S"

quasi escarp
#

Okie

slender orchid
#

So let's say
S = a1 + a2 + a3 (and so on).....+an

quasi escarp
#

Mm I understand

glossy shard
#

wavy curve method denotions are so confusing

slender orchid
quasi escarp
#

Next ?

glossy shard
#

how do i denote after ploting

slender orchid
slender orchid
glossy shard
#

wdym

slender orchid
#

This one is taken

quasi escarp
slender orchid
glossy shard
#

ok

slender orchid
quasi escarp
quasi escarp
slender orchid
#

So the series is still the same

quasi escarp
quasi escarp
slender orchid
#

Adding zero changes nothing

quasi escarp
#

Yes !

slender orchid
#

So now we will just subtract it

#

In a different way

quasi escarp
#

Mmm like those algebraic subtraction ?

#

Like changing signs down ?

slender orchid
#

Wait lemme send u a pic

quasi escarp
slender orchid
#

We just wrote these two series right?

#

But in a different way

quasi escarp
slender orchid
#

Now we will subtract the 1st one from second

#

What will be the LHS?

quasi escarp
#

Cuz S-S is 0 ?

#

Or am I tripping 😭

slender orchid
quasi escarp
slender orchid
#

Subtract like this

quasi escarp
#

Wait 🫷🏻 it is basically like an - an-1 right ?

slender orchid
#

So
0 = (a1-0) + (a2-a1) + ..... And so on

quasi escarp
#

Yay

slender orchid
#

And the end

quasi escarp
#

Mm

slender orchid
#

Now look carefully at the very last term

slender orchid
#

We just took it to LHS
Which became +an

quasi escarp
#

😮 it makes sense now

#

Yaya

slender orchid
#

an = (a1-0) + (a2-a1) + (a3-a2)+ ...... (an-an-1)

#

Yeah that's it

#

Now you'll probably get something useful while solving actual question from here

slender orchid
# slender orchid

Now try to solve the question at the bottom with the way we derived

quasi escarp
#

.... So we subtract each term from preceding ?

#

I am kinda confused...

slender orchid
#

The series is
5+7+13+85....
Right?

slender orchid
quasi escarp
#

Mm

slender orchid
#

So
S = 5 + 7 + 13 + 85..... And so on

#

Now we will write the same series but add a zero in the front

hardy widget
obtuse pebbleBOT
quasi escarp
slender orchid
#

Now just subtract like we did earlier

quasi escarp
slender orchid
#

I missed the 31

#

Shit

#

There's a 31 after 13

slender orchid
quasi escarp
#

Oh so we get 2,6,18,..?

slender orchid
#

Yes we get
5 + 2 + 6 + 18...

#

Now remember when I told you you'll get something useful after subtracting

#

5 + (2+6+18+ ...)

#

If we ignore 5

#

The rest of the terms are in GP

quasi escarp
#

Ooo

#

Common ratio is 3 ?

slender orchid
#

And don't forget the Tn and the end

quasi escarp
#

Yes sir

slender orchid
#

Yk the formula for the sum of GP right?

quasi escarp
#

I got
5 + 3^n+1 - 1

quasi escarp
quasi escarp
slender orchid
#

Check question

slender orchid
#

I think it's supposed to be

5 + 3^(n-1) - 1

#

Not n+1

#

So 4 + 3^(n-1)

quasi escarp
#

Oh yea srry

#

I have the option

#

Thank you so much

#

You are the god 😇🙏🏻 😭

#

You really helped me a lot

#

They should remove my teacher and hire you

#

Thank you so much from the bottom of my heart rlly 🙏🏻

slender orchid
#

It's not over yet tho
We have to find the sum

slender orchid
quasi escarp
#

But rlly thanksss

slender orchid
slender orchid
slender orchid
quasi escarp
#

Okiee thanksss so much < 3

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @quasi escarp

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

slender orchid
obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cyan lodge
#

we have a conraption that looks like this

obtuse pebbleBOT
cyan lodge
#

the triangle has equal sides

#

and it is known that the perimeter of the pentagon in 10

#

we have to find its maximum area

#

that's all we know

woeful pebble
#

But either way

#

U can just use calculus

cyan lodge
woeful pebble
#

Let side length of rectangle be y and side length of triangle be x

cyan lodge
#

this is the furthest I got

woeful pebble
woeful pebble
#

Basically

#

U can write y in terms of x

#

Then, get an expression for the area

cyan lodge
#

y= (10-3x)/2

woeful pebble
#

And sub the equation for y u got

high grotto
#

ques

woeful pebble
#

The goal is to learn

high grotto
cyan lodge
#

Idk man, this was the last problem on our test

#

if it's as easy as you say im gonna ctfo

woeful pebble
#

ITS FINE

#

ILL EXPLAIN IT

#

Did u get an expression

#

For the area

#

Of the pentagon

high grotto
cyan lodge
#

is this the equation that calculates the full area?

cyan lodge
woeful pebble
#

And now that u have this

#

U have 2 choices which are basically the same

#

But idk if u guys know calculus

cyan lodge
#

hmmm

#

tell me the solution, I'll tell you if I'm following

lime verge
woeful pebble
lime verge
woeful pebble
#

But if u use calculus

woeful pebble
lime verge
lime verge
cyan lodge
#

wait a second

#

ohhhhh

#

I think I get it

#

so I turn this formula into a graph

lime verge
#

you know how to differentiate or you doing it without it

#

nvm

cyan lodge
#

y = the equation above

lime verge
#

without it

woeful pebble
cyan lodge
#

and then find the tup

#

tip

woeful pebble
high grotto
#

@cyan lodge bro

#

I have

#

The method for uwithout calc

woeful pebble
#

But u can also try completing the square

high grotto
#

See

high grotto
#

See

#

@cyan lodge

#

Its doable for u

woeful pebble
cyan lodge
high grotto
#

Heron formula

cyan lodge
#

the triangle is equal sided

high grotto
lime verge
cyan lodge
high grotto
#

Bruh

woeful pebble
#

Get yo brahmagupta formula Outta

high grotto
#

I thought Isoceles

cyan lodge
high grotto
woeful pebble
lime verge
cyan lodge
#

no

high grotto
#

But it's equilateral nvm

#

Leme do again

woeful pebble
#

@cyan lodge just complete the square for the expression u have

lime verge
#

you can actually find A(X) and then its vertex will be the final ans

woeful pebble
#

For the area

#

And get the value of x at which it occurs

lime verge
#

well any method works

#

ig

woeful pebble
lime verge
#

to find vertex

#

of the quadratic

#

-b/2a

#

because A(X) is a quadratic

high grotto
#

@cyan lodge yk Heron's Formula for area?

lime verge
woeful pebble
high grotto
woeful pebble
woeful pebble
cyan lodge
woeful pebble
#

The derivation

#

Is the same

#

Ultimately

lime verge
#

🥀💔

woeful pebble
#

IM NOT DISAGREEING WITH U VRO

lime verge
#

(except heron's formula)

woeful pebble
#

💔🥹

lime verge
woeful pebble
#

But @cyan lodge did u get it

cyan lodge
lime verge
#

just follow @woeful pebble

high grotto
#

Wait

#

Its ezier

#

Equi ∆ area formula

lime verge
#

thats what im saying

cyan lodge
#

could you guys explain what you meant by "completing the square", I think there might be a language barrier

lime verge
#

@woeful pebble

woeful pebble
#

For any general quadratic ax²+bx+c

woeful pebble
#

U can express it as a(x+h)²+k

lime verge
high grotto
lime verge
#

hes prob doing it by the chinese dude's way

#

so let it continue

high grotto
#

Ig so

woeful pebble
lime verge
#

i got by am-gm

high grotto
#

Idk

#

Tell me some 1

woeful pebble
high grotto
#

Ioqm

lime verge
#

find the area

#

the equation of area

#

of the entire thing

#

or actually create another help channel

#

ill tell you there

#

this is occupied

#

mb

high grotto
high grotto
high grotto
lime verge
#

yes but its the op's channel

#

not ours

lime verge
#

@woeful pebble yall can continue

#

sorry bout the little invasion

woeful pebble
#

@cyan lodge u still here?

cyan lodge
#

yes

#

I'm trying to find it with the -b/2a method

#

but the answer is a mess

woeful pebble
#

Unless u have an answer already?

lime verge
cyan lodge
#

the area formula

#

and this is the quadratic equation I get

woeful pebble
#

It appears to be correct

#

Is this not the answer u were expecting?

cyan lodge
#

not really

#

I expect something without square roots an divisions

#

usually is the answer in these kinds of problems

woeful pebble
cyan lodge
woeful pebble
#

Sometimes theyre just like this

#

It's so u can deal with the numbers better

cyan lodge
#

yeah, but in the test, I have to write my own version of the answer on the sheet. If I got this answer during a test I would be hesitant to write it.

#

there's no a b c or d

woeful pebble
cyan lodge
#

ok

woeful pebble
#

Welcome to the club fr

cyan lodge
#

so the answer is whatever the y0 and x0 gives me when I plug it in

cyan lodge
#

great

cyan lodge
woeful pebble
cyan lodge
#

hope to be able to solve it with calculus in the future

woeful pebble
#

GLAD TO HELP

woeful pebble
cyan lodge
#

see ya

woeful pebble
#

ALR

cyan lodge
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @cyan lodge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rocky nymph
#

Heyo! I have a question regarding this exercise which i havent finished yet.
In my sketch i point the vector (1 -2 1), the normal of the plane) in the direction of the line l1, im afraid that this assumption is completely arbitrary or if it even is correct in the first place, how can i know? i didnt finish answering cause i dont want to make a mess because of a missing negative sign blobsweat

rocky nymph
#

if my sketch is correct, then AFa should be the opposite of what i wrote (the same for BFb), if my sketch is incorrect and the normal actually points away from the line then my reasoning should be correct :P

#

my guess would be that ofcourse it depends on the position of A and B, so would i need to plug in the coordinates of A into the equation of the plane, if its >6 then the angle formed with the normal is positive and thus its above plane, meanwhile if its <6 its beneath the plane? but im not sure if this makes sense or not

#

anyways, if someone answers please ping me :) thanks!

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rocky nymph Has your question been resolved?

pearl spruce
rocky nymph
#

<@&268886789983436800>

pearl spruce
#

Strictly speaking the same plane has infinitely many normal vectors, as long as its not a scale factor of zero

rocky nymph
#

for calculating AFa i multiply the distance between A and Fa by the normal vector (not considering the 1/sqrt(6) as it is not normalised) so do i not need to be careful on whether or not i need a negative sign?

pearl spruce
#

To be clear AFa is a distance right?

rocky nymph
#

its a vector

pearl spruce
#

Ah

rocky nymph
#

its the vector that i denote AF_A

rocky nymph
#

sry im on mobile so its a bit of a pain to use latex

#

to reflect l1 across the plane i first reflect two points A and B across the plane and then build l2. The issue is when reflecting a point P across the plane i do it by finding its distance to the plane, create the vector PFp where Fp is the foot of p on the plane, and then find P' (the reflected point) by doing OP' = OP + 2PFp.

The issue is finding the vector PFp knowing only the distance from P to Fp and the afformentioned facts, i do this by multiplying the numerator of the distance (so not including the norm of the normal as it is not necessary normalized) by the normal, the issue i found is that im not sure wether or not to i need to add a negative sign as the normal of the plane is not necessarily in the same direction as PFp

#

but more then likely im just confusing things and there is probably a better way to finding the vector PFp

#

ach is alright im just in pre exam craze so im probably not making any sense

#

thanks anyways :)

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rocky nymph

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

rocky nymph
#

i found a better way to solve the problem anyways

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

austere gazelle
#

Can someone help me with these 3 questions? I tried them on my own but I don't know where I went wrong

vestal steppe
gilded drift
vestal steppe
#

Like, you are given that f(x) = 1 - 2x - 5x^2, but you instead expanded f(x) = 5x^2 - 2x - 1 for some reason

vestal steppe
#

Don't you have to read like paragraphs for comp maths or smth

austere gazelle
#

The answer key says it's 40, even if it's a plus 1 it wouldn't make sense

vestal steppe
#

The function is

#

f(x) = 1 - 2x - 5x^2
Agreed?

gilded drift
austere gazelle
#

Agreed

vestal steppe
surreal plover
#

<@&268886789983436800>

vestal steppe
austere gazelle
#

Well I would turn it into [5(x+2)(x+2)] - 2(x+2) +1

#

Hindsight idk why I put -1

vestal steppe
#

Why [5(x + 2)(x + 2)]?

#

You are actually missing something here :)

austere gazelle
#

Because x squared, so (x+2) times itself

#

Which is (x+2)(x+2)

vestal steppe
#

Wait wait

#

The squared part is fine

#

But look at the function very closely

#

I'll give you a hint: what is the number in front of x^2?

#

In f(x) = 1 - 2x - 5x^2?

austere gazelle
#

Oh it's a -5 not 5

vestal steppe
#

There you go :)

#

So! What should our expression become?

austere gazelle
#

[-5(x+2)(x+2)] -2(x+2) +1

#

Right?

vestal steppe
#

So, what do we get when you expand this?

austere gazelle
#

[-5(x²+4x+4)] -2x -4 +1

vestal steppe
#

Yep, go on...

austere gazelle
#

Then (-5x² -20x +4) -2x -4 +1

#

Ooops

#

(-5x²-20x -20)

#

Mb

vestal steppe
#

You're good

#

Perfect!

#

You seem to know what you're doing here, I'll let you finish that off

vestal steppe
#

,rotate

warm shaleBOT
austere gazelle
#

Wait for the last question still I got -5x² -22x -19

vestal steppe
austere gazelle
#

-20 +1

vestal steppe
#

uhuh

#

I think you are forgetting something else

austere gazelle
#

What?

#

Ohhjh

#

The -4

vestal steppe
#

Indeed

austere gazelle
#

So -23

vestal steppe
#

Perfect

#

So, what's the answer?

austere gazelle
#

But that is =-50 and not 40

#

Ts is so confusing

vestal steppe
#

Really?

#

Show me

austere gazelle
vestal steppe
#

a - b - c is -50... reallllly now?

#

Alright

#

Prove it to me :)

austere gazelle
#

The question states and if f(x+2) is written in the form ax² +bx +c the value of a-b-c is blank

#

Oh wait

vestal steppe
#

Yep yep skip to the part where you calculate a - b - c

austere gazelle
#

I did it the wrong way

vestal steppe
#

Ooof

austere gazelle
#

I lowkey read right to left and not left ot right

vestal steppe
#

Rip

austere gazelle
#

So it's basically 45 -5

#

Which is 40

#

Okay, onto the next question

austere gazelle
vestal steppe
#

You just didn't finish it

austere gazelle
#

Idk how

vestal steppe
#

I.e what's -2/3 + 6

austere gazelle
#

Uhmmmm gimme 1 moment for the multiplication

vestal steppe
#

Take your time 👍

austere gazelle
#

16/3

#

Which is = to b

#

I lowkey spld that one

#

And how do I do the last one now?

#

Cause like I lowkey barely understood the question

#

Here's the question again

vestal steppe
vestal steppe
#

The thing is,

austere gazelle
#

Yeah I don't deserve my 94

vestal steppe
#

What's 5^-1 equal to?

austere gazelle
#

1/5

vestal steppe
#

Nice

#

So

#

How do you calculate 5^-1/(5^-1 + 4)?

vestal steppe
#

You clearly know what you are doing

slow wolf
#

Bro it’s 1/5 divided by (1/5 + 4)

austere gazelle
#

But like since they're both to the power of negative 1 don't they literally just swap?

slow wolf
#

It’s reciprocal

austere gazelle
#

Yeah Ik that

vestal steppe
#

Whenever you have an addition term in a fraction (with no brackets), then you can't "swap" the positions of reciprocals.

slow wolf
#

Wait is it 5 to the power -1+4

vestal steppe
#

It's the same reason what 2/(2 + 3) is not the same as 1/(1 + 3)

vestal steppe
slow wolf
#

Oh then it’s different

slow wolf
#

Then add the outer and inner power

vestal steppe
# austere gazelle Huh

[ \frac{5^{-1}}{5^{-1}+4} ]
The fact that the $+4$ is in the denominator means you \textbf{can't} swap the terms around.

warm shaleBOT
#

Average Maths Student

slow wolf
#

The way u wrote it is confusing

slow wolf
vestal steppe
austere gazelle
#

Cause like 5to the power of negative 1 plus 4 is different to 5 to the power of negative 1?

vestal steppe
#

To keep things simple, addition or subtraction in the denominator is bad - it messes up a lot of things.

austere gazelle
#

Cause it's like 20/5 which isn't the same as 1/5

#

Rough estimate btw

#

I think it's roughly 20/5

vestal steppe
#

roughly 20/5 wait wdym

austere gazelle
#

Well cause like you can't swap them around because it's roughly 1/5 over 20/5 which are not the same numbers

vestal steppe
#

Ngl I'm not sure what you are saying

austere gazelle
#

🙁

vestal steppe
#

I think you might be overcomplicating this a little

austere gazelle
#

I'm trying to say that like you can't swap them cause they're not the same base

vestal steppe
#

You can't swap them because there's an addition sign 😭

austere gazelle
#

?

vestal steppe
#

You can still "swap" numbers if they have different bases

#

$\frac{5^{-1}}{7^{-1}}=\frac{7}{5}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Average Maths Student

vestal steppe
#

The reason we can't swap here is purely because there's an addition sign

#

Between 1/5 and 4

austere gazelle
#

But when I was doing a different unit we could still do the switch even when there was a +4 though

#

Like exponent laws unit or smth

vestal steppe
#

I mean I can always show you it calculator wise

#

You can see the answer to both fractions are different, so you can't "swap" them.

#

The reason that you can't swap them is because the swapping rule only applies when there isn't addition.

#

You'll see it somewhere on your index laws

austere gazelle
#

No I mean for the 5^-1/5^-1+4

vestal steppe
#

wdym about it

#

Like

#

Okay let me just ask straight up