#serious-discussion
1 messages ¡ Page 455 of 1
Not to mention doesn't that establish more elitism by saying "These kids will help the poor dumb kids"
This is just silly. Students are there to learn, not teach; teaching is the teachers job (a revolutionary concept, I know).
Texas actually didn't like gifted education in elementary school
While NY was fine with it
this is only case where renaming is better
then you don't know what you're talking about
I mean I agree with removing the gifted program in Ontario at least, only way to get in it is some psuedo science-y psychology tests and shit in grade 3 (at least that's how it was when I was in school)
idk how it's done elsewhere
I mean
nG spiting nothing but facts today
The solution isn't get rid of it
not that it needs to be removed, but obscured
the program was specifically for kids like me who were completely underserved by public schools and needed better instruction
Probably best to make better selection systems rather than to abolish it
I think there are a lot of real issues with gifted/honors program and the burn out, but I don't think the solution was to axe it altogether. I'm confident that people can resolve these social issues without resorting to "Let's just throw it out"
obscured?
The solution is have a better way of sorting
So basically if I don't get what I want in life, I'd do my PhD in Math Education doing research on exactly this topic
I mean ya, if there was a better way to get in, I'd agree, but also I think the gifted program as a whole is flawed, I'd rather there be ways for students to get ahead in specific streams
Since it's something I do care about, and I'm good at
rather than a general gifted program
Like gifted per subject?
ya
An undereducated population is easier for the government to control just saying đĽ´
yes i also benefitted from gifted program in NY but it always felt pretentious to state it. i felt like they should just name classes 1 and 2 or a and b without students knowing one has accelerated learning. to keep students humbled
Hmm...
well, that's assuming that it's optimal for government to control the population in the US
Liberals will support AOC but not use the well-ordering theorem
gifted per subject is closer to what I think would be better than what I've seen currently exists
the two criteria for applying for this program is 1) cognitive testing and 2) evidence that being in an underserving public school is actively harming the child
It seems their new system is incapable of pushing the gifted, helping those who need it, or inspiring the rest of the crowd. Everyone is worse, how wonderful
this is completely reasonable
i agree
But if you look at the US governmental structure it's clearly designed to be as inefficient as humanly possible
I never benefited from anything in hs sad, I was mostly miserable in the classes and such
Poros I think logistics starts to become a difficulty in implementing that
So it's not an optimal solution to keep people undereducated. It's more optimal to educate people in our system
An undereducated population believes that the government puts microchips in vaccines
I think the best way to fix the US education system is to burn the entire fucking thing down
But yeah so
True true
I was in this weird situation where
i dont know if thats a vocal minority or not
With litetal torches and fire
I was in NY for a while
And I was in the "AP1 program" from first to third grade
The way NY does it is
Or at least my area of NY
I've seen some fallouts of the education system in NY. Philip Uri Treisman at UT Austin has an excerpt from a book on his experience in NY
You have Delta, AP1, AP2, regular
I respect this in part, as the federal government was designed to have much less power than it does today
Weâve mutated it into something it was not intended to be, for better or for worse
About not getting into the honors class, getting picked on
Delta you have to test into, AP1 and AP2 are on basis of what your kindergarten teacher rec
Ok but I missed the context for this conversation. Someone is getting rid of something now?
they often arent
I mean the teacher can be racially biased and such might also be a problem
This is actually interesting, kindergarten teachers are actually very good at spotting disabilities, social ineptitudes, and other disorders. Much better than parents
liberal states like Oregon and California and Washington are lobbying to remove mathematics standards at the K-12 level based on some braindead notion that high standards create inequality
my aunt teaches in harlem and she tells me all about it
What standards?
I run an academic support center at a historically black college, and I've yet to hear about how we need to lower standards
e.g. needing to show proficiency with basic math curriculum by the end of high school
exactly, this is all just white liberal bullshit for the most part
The question is always how do we get students to rise to expectations and challenges
I have never met anyone who believed this except dumb highschoolers
that's moronic and you should feel bad for posting this
School is also about social development, not just academic
It does piss me off when a bunch of rich fucks âspeak for the poorâ
tbh i feel like some students would benefit from having more one on one time
Imagine you're 10 years old learning with 6 year olds
but logistically not possible
All students would
âThis is a fine system.â
âOh, you canât understand why itâs so bad for you! Donât you worry, weâll speak for you and âfixâ it all upâ
This
So much this
I absolutely learn better by myself
I self taught myself composing and audio production so THATS bullshit!
you can learn in isolation but not as quick unless you had books
Holy based
Well, obviously you need a source to learn from
However, school was very important to make sure I grew socially in a healthy manner
Yeah, lol
I remember calculating Christoffel symbols in my Spanish I class
i didnt struggle with learning anything in school until uni
Early onset Alzheimerâs moment
đ

Thatâs incredibly impressive, bravo
Most of highschool was genuinely just waste of time for me and it made me pretty depressed
Hey whoever
High school was shit
College better but still too many requirements
And hi johndegen
Agreed HS was a complete waste of time and made me want to neck myself
I had math 8 and algebra at the same time in middle school which was the most assinine thing ive ever went through. They made a small group of us take algebra an hour after school so we left later than everyone
I have to take 10 classes for different requirements
Nice lol
and then they budget cut algebra when i left
Alrighty the interesting part of the convo is gone
Did all humanities by ap gang
Bruh what is this law
Grouping everyone in the same math class until 11th grade?
wait where
That's actually -1head
hard not to when you're always right
Oh yeah? Prove RH then
Not even 0head suffices to capture the stupidity of that
how so?
what law faye?
0head
I was reading an article
it's really not
Whereâs the proof thonk
I just looked this up
I mean functionally there are no year limits until you get to some cutoff point
that cutoff point is functionally the limit
you cannot do away with these cutoff points vis a vis requiring people to show a certain level of proficiency before graduating
wtf
if you do, you are lowing standards, plain and simple
this is low iq
Itâs works for PhDs not 1 2 3s you know what Iâm saying
I'm talking about requiring passing certain coursework e.g. by the time you graduate high school
people are explicitly trying to do away with this
Opponents donât see it that way, especially because the proposed guidance recommends doing away with the tracking of students, suggesting instead that students of all backgrounds and readiness should be grouped together in math classes through 10th grade.
if i was i K-12 id really hate school
this is what I am taking issue with
What is this bullshit
People want to get rid of that
this is completely separate to the point I'm making

I literally just said
the particular thing I am taking issue with
nGroupoid is saying that you should have to be able to pass things like Algebra II to graduate
All this does is create another inequity where the gifted rich kids can afford private school where they can thrive and the gifted poor kids just get fucked by being forced to take low level classes
yes clearly
Pretty much
Like how does anyone not see this
is this the beginning of the end
this is EXACTLY THE POINT, people are suggesting to just do away with those exams and standards in the first place
Itâs rich white liberals who donât understand that concept Faye who are proposing this
No, their goal is to nuke the exams
not to be decios advocate
but what if we are biased
Weâre talking about liberal lawmakers in certain American states
Biased towards what??
Yohan I think we're arguing two completely orthogonal points
Is this bill like being secretly funded by racists trying to use liberal language to pass laws to keep gifted black kids down
This is a stupid argument 9, if thereâs a reason state it
Or are people just this stupid
what if the article was written to make people fired up
Does anyone else have a strong suspicion this is going to further the gap between wealthy students in educationally stronger environments and most other people lol
I donât need some non existent arguement to change my mind
Yeah that's what I just said
okay then why were you so sure that you "proved me wrong"
lol
anyways

okay buddy
this cant be a popular opinion though
like surely majority of people are against this
Maybe the article is just wrong
Yohan is saying that gifted kids shouldnât be limited by the rigid structure of schools, and be allowed to move into more advanced areas more quickly
nGroupoid says that schools shouldnât abolish basic requirements to graduate (like Alg II)
Two completely different convos
you have yet to demonstrate this, so far you're just stating your opinion and claiming this as victory
Is the point of this just to make more people get their diplomas?

Honestly probably just this yeah
Yep. Just shove kids through, even if they donât understand, so that schools get more money
Probably it just looks better for the schools and the state if more people pass
I guess thats kind of necessary considering how essential diplomas are to most people but if you aren't actually teaching them the material any better and just pushing them out the door thats uh...
This is cooking the numbers, more students pass more money for school districts
I live in bloody Kentucky, and my school district is abolishing failing and pushing kids through
God help California
Thisi s the real answer 
no, you demonstrated that you completely misunderstood what I was arguing against in the first place
eventually people will gret BAs in 12th grade
Every year or couple years state edu depts are required to publish reports on how they are doing and no one wants to be in the position of saying "sorry things are shit" every year
Eventually people wonât be able to do prealgebra in 12th grade
okay buddy whatever
And if things arent improving it has questionable implications for the people in charge so
Yeah this is probably more office politics then we might realize ig
Instead of fixing education, letâs eliminate it so that we look good
What a brilliant idea
it is a good idea
for them
not for society
right so there are office politics incentives to doing this but it's ultimately justified using completely braindead liberal ideals about equality of outcome
the entire justification for trying to do away with AP courses is that this creates inequality of outcome
I hate libs 
Do any liberals seriously support equality of outcome
no
This is why every educational chancellor and major education lawmaker in NYC has been talking about making "huge changes" for the past like 5 decades 
isnt equality of outcome like
Tbh I think there are some valid arguments against AP
straight up in violation of liberal principles
But the lib one is stupid
Instead of providing equality of opportunity, they want âequityâ
Or is this just a rightwing strawman of the left
wtf that mean
yes, but a lot of liberals (read: largely democrats that have coopted leftist ideas without understanding the consequences) are pushing for this
This
Liberals donât have principles, they wanna look woke without understanding underlying issues or really even doing anything
yea pretty much
Theoretically some education reformers do seem to be pushing for something like this but also a lot of it is people with office agendas capitalizing off of mass frustration with education inequality 
Liberals are not leftists
eh, thatâs a bit ad hominem chief
Liberals would be right winged in most other countries other than America
I mean "liberals want everyone to have the exact same amout of money and power always regardless of effort" is a thing the right loves to say to get people on their side
No political movement has principles 
No this is p much all neoliberals
"<People I disagree with> don't have principles"
so there are the actual leftists who are pushing for equality of outcome for more nefarious political reasons, there are liberals who are also pushing for it because they have coopted it under the guise of helping marginalized groups without actually understanding that this does the opposite
I prefer retroliberals
Liberals usually refer to neoliberals
liberals who are useful idiots for these kinds of policies literally do not have principles
Bit of a Machiavellian outlook, but probably approximately correct
where is liberalism actually right wing
Its not really machiavellian its just like
thats a commonly repeated talking point but like
in europe, the most liberal parties tend to be described as centrist
in the US, weakly speaking
if not centre-left
Classical liberalism has some things that would be considered economically right nowadays, if memory serves
not necessarily
You will realize immediately that they are filled with grifters, people latching on to a movement for a sense of community, etc
if you look at something like immigration laws, most right wing parties in europe are illiberal immigration-wise
There is no major political movement that is "pure"
ill hard agree
And there never has been
my roomate is a prime example
I mean every major political party in the US, both left and right wing, is largely right wing when it comes to economic policy when compared to the rest of the civilized world
is this supposed to be groundbreaking moth
Your roommate is a large political movement?
There are precisely two major political parties
Politics are just a trap meant to distract you from math.
in terms of social policy, it's more complicated
i think aiming for purity is a bad thing anyway
its the motivation for 99% of twitter leftist infighting
stupid purity testing
No I'm just responding to the claim that liberals dont have any principles
Like true but functionally no major movement does
ÂŻ_(ă)_/ÂŻ
Yeah fair ig
yes liberals (derogatory) do not have principles
No one is talking about economic policy when referring to 'right' or 'left' these days
classical liberals have principles sure
Itâs usually social business, yes
I would not consider most neolibs in the US to be classical liberals in this sense
Anyways, we are moving into territory where I have no informed opinion (if I ever did at all during this convo)
well a shitton of people corroborate the phrase "classical liberal" as well
er
corroborate is the wrong word
No the motivation is bored people with clout grifting or seeking attention or both
what word am i thinking of
coopt
Dave Rubin moment
No one actually cares about purity 
Heinrich Himmler moment
im sure a lot is STARTED by attention seeking
All of these people are friends with people with radically different political ideologies
I read once that Twitter is an app seemingly custom-build for maximum wild idiocy
but the reason people dont like
call out that behaviour
for what it is
is because they want to be seen as part of the "in group"
Well. Iâll remain silent nevertheless
yes it is
its also very good resource
unlike you!
who uses social justice terminology they learned from 2013 tumblr to criticize anything they personally dislike regardless of how oppressive it actually is
I mean part of it but its also a thin psychological justification for framing schadenfreude as righteous
i mean its similar to libertarianism i think
The actual specifics of the politics barely matter
libertarianism is stupid but in the abstract, it has principles
i disagree with the motivation behind them
and no one actually follows these principles
but they do exist
Most of the ppl who rally for leftist purity are totally fine with "impure" ideologies 99% of the time
what are examples of this besides education one we were talking about
yea I mean nobody actually follows all of these principles in the absolute lest they end up in "what if the child consents" land
i mean thats the thing
or just hating taxes in the abstract
despite taxation sometimes being a mechanism for fair pricing
okay but that's based
(e.g. in carbon)
Voting is hard here
I just want to support folks with moral decency who want to help the poor genuinely
i think most people enter politics with good intentions
hate it here
it just doesnt last
thinking about this post
how it started: https://twitter.com/briebriejoy/status/1428770764623339520
Rest assured, Iâll never own a home. đĽ˛
169
3719
how it's going: https://twitter.com/HandsomeRecluse/status/1428773276722114563
Oof
Guys i swear im not rich đ im hip and middle class like everyone else đ
whats with certain leftists targeting the middle class anyway
arent they the petty bourgeoisie
ben fucking thrown under the bus
namington can you give an example?
besides education
I can't afford a house because I have to pay my darn employees a darn salary
I hate the general trend from both sides to push for division between wide groups of people
I know why theyâre doing it, itâs easy to stir up emotions to get votes
Itâs doing a boatload of harm, though
any at all that go against market behaviour
insane zoning laws are literally the main thing that fucked up San Francisco as a city 
I firmly do not believe the majority of twitter leftists could define this term
noise is big no?
shit like minimum parking laws is explicitly anti-libertarian
yet many support them because "muh home value"
But also not everyone in the middle class is petite bourgeoisie
Which is funny bc of how similar democrats and@republicans are lol
Brie would be tho
dempublicans
Republocrats
No the one we are talking about now
are minimum parking laws zoning laws meant to reduce parking zones?
proletariate: everyone exactly at below my income
petite bourgeoisie: everyone exactly above it that isn't above a completely arbitrary threshold I have set in my mind
bourgeoisie: my grandparents
honestly i just looked at the twitter tag 
True!
Petite bourgeois as a term is not used much in marx tbh
Apparently, Portland is a nightmare now
Instead of helping the homeless, theyâve just done lip-service by just removing laws
Poop on the streets, tent cities everywhere
Itâs just hurting everyone, and I canât do a thing to help
yea Portland is a literal shithole now
because of these policies
I watched it collapse within about a decade of living there
interesting
I enjoy how Bernie Sanders, when he became a millionaire, immediately went from decrying millionaires and billionaires to just billionaires
because people are too "nice" to clear out the homeless
i thought oregon was cool
it kinda sucks now lol
Does clearing out the homeless actually solve the problem?
i was thinking about going to reed college
(giving them housing does)
no, but it's also no excuse to just let it fester
Seems like it just moves the problem around?
they need actual affordable housing
Yah true.
(its less expensive to just give them free housing than to conitnue current policies)
no
I mean like, they instituted a policy of giving out free clean needles to drug addicts with the purpose of harm reduction; can you guess what HARD TO PREDICT externality this has had in the last five years?
some are
No, thatâs about $110,000 at minimum (and even thatâs generous)
Itâs a lot cheaper to live elsewhere
something like 65% of americans own homes
Needle shortage
65% of americans are not millionaires
housing bubble inc
no, there are just loads and loads of dirty needles on the streets now
go fucking figure
It was joke
Based
one of SF's largest problem is zoning laws and a huge activist core that pushes against literally any and all construction of affordable housing because of some insane fear of gentrification and destruction of """historical neighborhoods"""
let the historical neighborhoods be dismantled
Ah, I missed Starbucksâs burnt coffee
Historical neighborhood lolol
wow it would be such a shame if san francisco, bastion of the lower classes, was gentrified
This is such a white liberal thing to do, historical neighbothood
thank god that hasnt happened yet
Are we just dunking on California? đ
I hope these policies donât come a creepinâ over here
Oregon too
yes 
Old californians migrate to oregon more now I think.
Portland doesn't even have stand your ground laws which is the worst part
It's like retirement home CA
Iâve not heard of these, whatâs this?
Thonk stand you ground laws, why would you want that
stand your ground means if someone breaks into your house you can shoot them
Lol
Hegel be ready
Basically gives you the right to stand your ground and shoot your attacker
We need to be on guard with where this conversation may lead
well, Iâm not moving to Oregon, I guess
So wait what's Oregon's shtick?
Massachussets iirc is a "duty to retreat" state
What
meaning if someone breaks into your house, you have a duty to leave or hide in your house
If a strange man comes into my home trying to talk to me about rejecting the axiom of choice I ought to have the right to defend myself.
Yeah the house thing is,kinda bad
if you try to fight back you can pretty easily get charged with assault or manslaughter
ur srs?
But anywhere outside ur house I kinda agree donât shoot someone cause stand ur ground
thats cringe and bluepilled
I think stand your ground laws are specifically about homes no?
12 states impose a duty to retreat when one can do so with absolute safety: Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin.
Is there a variant for something else?
I mean I mostly remember when ppl used it outside of home
i agree
it's generally not a good idea, but you should be allowed to do it
Like even if you dont care about whether the bugler dies
bugler
Bugle players aren't people
toot toot
BANG BANG
I care if the bugler dies
Its a really easy way to escalate the situation and end up with someone (possibly you) hospitalized lol
Honestly I kinda cracked the code for muggers
Real people play respectable brass instruments
swiper no swiping
Sample size 1 this works
There was some grocery store robbery or smth
if you just don't consent to a break and entry they can't do it
i always cross through my neighbors backyard in the morning as a shortcut to get to my bus stop
and this one time he pulled his gun out
Nah I'm not talking about consent
Where the person just ignored the robber and the,robber eventually left
Excuse me robbery is illegal.
based
It was v funny
No no doot dooter
Pls stop robbing me
i stopped taking that shortcut
Smh you guys clearly haven't heard my story
why didnt u just ask him
he was like
I was with my dad at Sam's club
I watched something like this lol
âwhat is this brownie doing on my property at 7 amâ
We see this guy who looks exactly like Boris Johnson
based and crudetounged
And are like lul
Turns out he parked closer to the store than we did so before we get to our car we stop by him
And we're like yo
You look like Boris Johnson
he died of parkinsonâs last year
nvm dami deserved to get robbed
i had mixed feelings
lol wdym
Me
"Who's that?"
"British politican"
"Are you British?"
"No we're Moroccan"
"Ah so are you Muslim?"
"Yeah"
Ăşltimamente you didnt know jim well
Turns out this guy is Bahai
like my parent's formally very safe neighborhood now has homeless wandering through it and breaking into cars and houses
like sometimes he would forget heâs racist
Which is this incredibly nutty offshoot of Islam
And he's preaching to us for hours
Lmaoo
While we're talking
Someone drives up in a white pickup truck and has a face covering
Mumbles something we can't hear
We're like ?
He repeats himself
has a face covering
How respectful of him
Again can't hear it
Come again?
At this point I kinda get close ish to him
And he pulls out this massive gun
And I'm just like
Fucking speak
Please
Pointing a gun at my chest does not fix the problem that you're whispering
This in NA?
I swear this server always has the best stories
and then they got so close they kissed
So I'm like ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh that explains the gun
and he said: "what the fuck did you say about me you little bitch I'll have you know I graduated at the top of my class
I turn to my dad and the other guy like yeah he wants our wallets
Now remember how I said the Bahai guy parked closer to the store than us?
Well
We didn't unpack our groceries yet

So my dad's leaning on a shopping cart packed
And dead in the eye says to him "Sorry we can't help you"
And the fucker just leaves
maybe he just wanted food đŚ
I think he even says "Thanks"
once again, boris johnson indirectly yet inevitably makes someone elseâs life worse
Wtfff
how kind
you miss 100 of the shots you dont take
Lmao Yohan
But yeah so
From this I can confirm
That refusing muggers just works
Maybe it was his first time?
This advice equally applies to the dad and the robber
lol dont try it ull just get murked
Dami that reminds me of that old greentext
Tbh you guys are probably the bad guys in this story for not being more supportive.
Tbh if I was a mugger Iâd just be surprised by the courage and,let yâall go
Same
My dad is very unfazed by the stuff
Early 90s when he was in NY he had to deal with shit all the time
And uh
Despite the fact that now he's the most mellow person I have ever met
Apparently his solution to thieves back in the day was to beat the living shit out of them
I'd just give them my wallet. There's no cash in it.
ur dad is just lucky
Chad dad
He told me some crazy stories
He was working in a flower shop once
And this guy was stealing a lot
Finally caught him
This probably confused the other guy so much that he just let them go
of the many things Islam has correct, amputating the hands of thieves is one of them
Beat him up so hard that he started coming to my dad and telling him about other thieves

Like, sure you want some old cards I'm gonna cancel after you leave? Aite.
In another story my dad actually had to go to court
But the guy confessed to being a thief so they were like nah you chill
It was in NJ
This is why Iâm glad my family is tall
Nobody tries to rob my dad, because heâs a 6â10â Slavic man
This one guy was a huge problem for him and his partner
He knew their car
So when they'd leave their business
He'd sneak in
One day they rent a different van to catch him in the act
And they finally catch him and just fuck him up

Like "He would've been hospitalized if the police didn't interfere" fuck him up
based
They had to write the report and they were like yeah honestly people like that need a beating, apparently excluded some details
Next day in court turns out the guy confessed that he was stealing
And they the court is like alright u good fam peace
Those stories still kinda throw me off because I've almost never heard this guy raise his voice lol
But đ¤ˇ
After that muggin at Sam's the Bahai guy kept preaching until we finally shook him off
And my dad was just like
Yeah that guy scares me
Lmaooo
White people piss themselves at the sight of a gun
I have no idea how this guy kept his composure
He's not a normal person
To be fair most@ppl do not@just white lol

debatable
Honestly I probably only kept composure since I was confused lol
ive seen lots of people do dumb shit with guns and not fear anything
people like to act tough until they got shot too
ive only seen someone get shot twice though
only
Like
How many muggers are actually willing to shoot someone though
i live in bronx so shootouts and these moments happen frequently where i live
Maybe but you see this borderline machine gun in your face
esp at playgrounds
You're not usually gonna be like
"Well statistically..."
But I was just confused like
What
My dad at least remembers it as a machine gun but I thought it was just a very large pistol
How tf did a mugger get a machine gun
Feels like something for higher class criminals
I don't think it was one
ppl have AVs and AKs where i live
idk how
I thought it was something like this
big iron robbing you
We're not well-versed in gun terminology
I do wonder what would happen on average if you stand your ground to a mugger
I would wager they just outlast you
Donât use stand ur ground law against muggers
A 100 buck ainât worth anyoneâs life
Because now they have a more serious problem
How many times the guy just walks away, how many times he tries to press it more, how many times you actually get hurt
But they could like
not worth yours, but it is worth theirs
Shoot your legs or smth
nG sure but the point is you're more likely the one to get fucked lol
Kek true
the chad move is to empty your wallet, and then just shoot them as they're walking away
Just deadpan tell them if they don't put the gun away you'll jump on them
Stand your ground laws or not
Absolutely not Faye
Muggers would rather not kill you and you might be able to get away with a lot of shit
yea it's kinda a big risk
To lose a 100 buck
It depends how much you value your life
Like Iâd feel bad if I killed the mugger over something I earn in like 2 hrs
I agree, it's not worth the legal stuff you have to deal with afterwards
Mugger is still a person thonk
If the mugger was willing to pull through over it I'd feel less remorse
just give them everything?
Sure you have a right to defend but doesnât mean I feel good that someoneâs life got lost
"pull through" = they're willing to kill you to get your property
i always have my card frozen anyways
"I would feel great about it"
depending on the situation
Oof I think u typoed
you say that but you wouldnt know
Was v concerned
nG feels sadistic pleasure in killing muggers
Bit too late fam
Ng cancelled once again
lol
I may or may not have already sent screenshots to every number theorist in North America
if someone broke into my house though
I would feel very little remorse over defending my property
It was quality indeed
Idk thatâs wierd to me, like these were still people no matter how bad
Like they mostly arenât that horrible people even ig
I think if someone breaks and enters a home they relinquish any expectation of safety on their part
forget about property, you're defending you
yea that too
I mean I agree sure
you forgot to add in the boris johnson detail
I wonder if there's an angle in just convincing the mugger you're insane and not worth the risk
is the difference
Faye no
the mugger could know boris johnson
I would feel bad in the sense that Iâd run my head through how the killing could have been avoided
For almost all muggers
And generally feel guilty
You just surrender your positions
it could be avoided if the person didn't break into your damn house lol
I mean yeah
I would feel bad about what kinds of circumstances would lead someone to do this, sure
But if you're trying to stand your ground anyways
If the answer is "It was my life or his"
Yeah
Even though it's not smart
iâm just hoping to have a kid before a robber kills me
yea
that way he can grow up to be batman
Forgiveness is a core part of my belief system tho
I mean I phrased it hyperbolically but the point being like
If one of us is gonna die
If there was a thief in my house, I would not go to kill
Or if this person's continued existence leads to the death of a loved one
Oh yeah that makes sense
sure
I would defend myself, but I would definitely not aim to kill
Iâm a tad influenced by the Levitical law as well, I suppose
right the issue though is that in the moment you have to make a decision, often on imperfect information, and usually leaning towards doing everything you can to protect yourself
But sometimes any option other than the person's death puts me or a loved one at risk
In that case no remorse
No I agree ng but that doesnât lessen the guilt for me ig
like if some teenager breaks into my house with a BB gun say
and I shoot them
and later realize shoot they didn't have a real gun
sucks for them I guess
I would not feel bad
well sure
Without feeling like I fucked up
Well, Iâm thinking of this
âIf a thief is found breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there shall be no bloodguilt for him, but if the sun has risen on him, there shall be bloodguilt for him.â
ââExodus⏠â22:2-3a âESVâŹâŹ
yea I mean I won't lie that thought would likely cross my mind
but based on the information I would likely have at that point in the situation
it would be a justifiable choice, even if it's not the best one if I had perfect information
If itâs night and you kill someone breaking in, you wouldnât be held accountable, as you couldnât see him clearly and thus canât be held responsible for the murder. If itâs day, you can see him, and you would be held responsible for manslaughter or murder.
I think it's hard on your conscience and it would be especially tough if it was easily resolvable
oh depending on the state you are VERY much held accountable lol
But if you know that in the moment you're like
Oh shit
My wife might die
If I don't act
yeah the panic is understandable
Then I think even psychologically it'll be easier to be okay with the situation
Well, yeah, this is the Levitical law, not American
Like when you relive the memory you'll relive the fear this person put into you
And plus the person who was very willing to harm innocent people
Don't quite feel as bad for such folk
idk i dont think im an innocent person.
oh here's a hot moral question: is it justifiable for doctors to turn away COVID patients if they had the opportunity to get vaccinated and chose not to?
When you kill someone on self-defense in the US, (I'm no lawyer) but you have to have good reason to say that you were defending your life
This varies by state to state
nG I'd say if space is a concern maybe?
Some states have a stand your ground law
you are harming other ppl too
Which is pretty vague
Like
so the headline there is misleading but yea it's bad
not just the covid person
In the Mosaic law, accidental manslaughter was usually dealt with by having the culprit confined to one of six cities until the current high priest died
However, if it was night, the person wouldnât even have to do that.
If you've got one hospital bed left
it's really frightening how many people are unironically suggesting that this would be an okay thing to do
And you have a covid guy who didn't vaccinate come at the same time as a drunk driving victim
and like even if u werent, like these ppl are a victim of propoganda and the larger system as a whole really
*if it was night and you killed a thief breaking into your home
like they have responsibility ofc but they are still victims and they deserve treatment lol
yea I mean you have to make those decisions based on urgency of care, not what the person did to get themselves into that situation
Yeah, it also goes against many ethical oaths that doctors take
I'm presuming both people are like
its equivalent to some "treat criminal or innocent person" delimmas
yea
I mean at the end of the day when you're actually dealing with capacity issues these kinds of decisions have to be made and there's no good way to make them unfortunately
If someone has to go I might be more willing to save the person who just got fucked rather than someone who threw away his own life
But if I've got space I'm not gonna be like
Nah fuck u
yeah like i cannot blame anyone making any choice in this situation
if its like really a 1 bed 2 ppl situation
what's concerning is the number of people that are suggesting this as a sort of punitive rage against the unvaccinated
Oh. Idk the exact justification (Iâve a couple ideas), but Iâd need to do a bit of research before I could give you the best possible answer
George Takei recently tweeted something to this effect, like "hospitals should just refuse care to the unvaccinated and maybe it would make people think twice about not getting the shot"
which is just INSANE
Shouldnât you judge between âwhoever needs the bed moreâ rather than over vaccination status
yea
That's... not gonna work lol
George takei has some of the worst takes
Whatever, I donât know crap about anything
So I mean, if I'm gonna try to be maximally charitable
like when i say "i wish all the boomers would die" or smth
i dont actually wish that lol
...no?

Meh I can't be very charitable to this guy at all
I'm also concerned with the fact that the state forcing medical decisions on you against your will. Ok, the covid-19 vaccine has been mostly safe, and pretty effective. But that's not always the case, and we still don't know the longer term consequences of these vaccines. Hopefully there aren't any but
the other variant of this that I've seen a lot lately is people saying "well hospitals should still offer care to the unvaccinated, but they should just be denied insurance benefits"
A brief look at the history of the US gov't conducting medical experiments on slaves and immigrants
Hmmmm
Is enough to justify a distrust in government made medical decisions

How do insurance companies handle smokers?
yea exactly like
I guess it makes your premiums go up on average
but no doctor is going to be like "oh lung cancer? well tough shit buddy"
I mean so I guess there is a relevant empirical question here
How many people in the US right now are truly unable to get vaccinated?
They would if they could
But they can't because of medical condition
41%, bc of brain disease known as trump.
So they rely on herd immunity
drumpf
within major urban centers where fast spread is a major concern, practically nobody
herd immunity is a cope atm because delta
the places where people genuinely can't get vaccines are also so sparsely populated that spread is less of a risk
but its still worthwhile
Yeah like
orange man bad
yes.
But that doesn't mean there aren't genuine concerns for not wanting to get a covid-19 vaccine. One of my friends fainted after getting vaxx'd
brain cancer? I told you to stop doing analysis
who knows why he fainted
fucking your mom is also a cope
i have a similar story
If 10% of the population was immunocompromised in a way that their safety relied on others getting vaccinated
He fell on his head and got a concussion
đ
I mean I know some people that had some very serious reactions to the first dose and were told by their doctors to absolutely not get a second
but those cases are like
concuss on DN
fairly rare in the grand scheme of things
Then I'd argue not getting the vaccine or quarantining hard is like
how rare per 100k, nG?
ppl will take the stupidest edge case and think" whats more concerning, the virus fucking up the country for like a year or this 2 people who fainted"
i fainted second dose pfizer and my friend got j and j and fainted
I guess I just think people can make their own medical decisions for themselves with their doctor privately
Idk some finite number of steps short of involuntary manslaughter
first time i felt fatigued af
And I'm not a fan of state sponsored medical advice in general
tfw the orange man is bad
i got sputnik v and felt Shitty the day after, both shots
but then afterwards i was fine
lol not dizzy
yea that's minor
hospitalized because i hit my head hard
Like, on the extreme end
then lie in a bed lol
If everyone who wants to get vaccinated can do so safely
you stay at home and let yourself rest lol
I genuinely don't give a shit
i was at home lol
On the extreme end of things in Mainland China where they lock you in your apartment and if you break the tape then the cops will come beat you up
same shit happened to my friend
I hope you do for your own sake
ppl just need an excuse to not get vaccineted
But I'm not your boss
You wanna put yourself at risk, you don't answer to me
thats extreme
I do, because there are some folks who canât (like chemo patients) who need the protection of herd immunity
You answer to your loved ones
There is a genuine concern over how much power you give the state during pandemics
Yeah Tesseract my point here is
serious reactions like anaphylaxis is maybe around 2 to 5 per million, but less life threatening allergic reactions are more common
It reduces transmission iirc
department of buildings showed its corruption during this pandemic
There is a genuine concern over how much power you give the state during pandemics
If it were the case that everyone who cares gets it, then at that point as far as I'm concerned every person answers to himself
it reduces transmission, but in general imperfect vaccines speed up the development of new strains
If on the other end there's a ton of people who rely on herd immunity
Yeah, but I think it becomes heightened during pandemics because they'll use the pandemic as an excuse to seem power or policy for emergency use, and keep that in-stated well after the pandemic is over
Nah, limited government is nice, thatâs all
to seize*
Then failing to take the vaccine arguably means you have other people's blood on your hands
So it's a sliding scale
yes
delta

It seems we're much closer to the former than the latter case
it's not enough of a reason not to vaccinate by any means
but there is still some risk
do they have in person classes in yalls college
yup, no mask mandate either lol
Where most people who want to vaccinate can do so safely. In which case my overall take is something like
I'm fine with putting moderately heavy restrictions on people who do not vaccinate
there's fairly large pressure to get the mask mandate going but I don't know how much it would realistically fix
e.g. UW Madison has all unvaccinated students test weekly
Yeah in person classes + mask mandate + vaccine mandate
one of my prof is a chad and moved it online tho
I am glad that classes are in person
My school recently applied a mask mandate to everyone
I have to teach, since I'm at a private school we have mask mandates, air filters, vaccines, and I have my windows open
but it's still not ideal
and I'm ok w/ myself being exposed, but I'm more worried about the students I teach and the employees I manage
unfortunately a mask mandate doesn't stop students from doing whatever the hell outside of class, and this is where most of the really fast spreading happens anyways
Heck, I got the vax in April
My sudden urge to buy seven Surface Pro 3s had nothing to do with this
delta is so sad, i really wanted like normal classes this sem
also masks hardly do anything unless you're wearing proper ones
ppl wearing a cloth 
Yeah you need a full on n-95
cloth masks are basically just security theater at this point
and a form of politeness
they don't actually do anything
Also you have to keep a clean shaven face
or the ppl who wear a mask but not over their noses
and regularly wash your hands, hair, etc.

Right now if you choose not to vaccinate out of ignorance, I will not violate your bodily autonomy here because it turns out almost everyone who wants to keep safe from you can sorta do so (aka you're not borderline committing murder by not vaccinating), but I am fine with making your life inconvenient
âI will not violate your bodily autonomyâ
I will violate your bodily autonomy if you dont get vaccinated, been a while since aggravated assault
Does bodily autonomy extend to choosing what you wear?
I mean I've accepted that I will get sick at some point this semester, I've already had COVID before when it just got to the US, I would rather take getting sick again over another semester of isolation
oof sad nG
The flu does this every year
Iâm not sure what the fuss is now, as the elderly are mostly vaccinated (who were the main impetus behind all this in the first place)
do you still have your sense of smell
yea lol
im p upset cause covid started during my hs graduation and is still going. mfw never had a normal college class 
I don't think I have any long term effects
has your hairline done any noticeable receding?
no
ok good
However, I admit ignorance in epidemiology, so
I mean the only thing I've noticed is some cognitive impairment but I only started noticing that once I was in lockdown for a while and not seeing people for weeks at a time
I believe the vaccine is 86% effective instead of 95% for Delta, if memory serves
wonder why
depression moment
itâs in important determinant

yea literally
are you completely isolated from everyone nG?
RIP
cdc apperantly suggests 3rd dose for ppl with bad immune systems
That must've been rough
Lord of the Mysteries
yea I became pretty alcoholic during that period, also wonder why
Complete isolation is one of the only things that truly gives me pause, as it has right proper screwed me up in the past
Glory
Do most states still have the mask mandates ? I know schools can still impose it so i guess it doesn't exactly matter and other business maybe
Some states have made it illegal to enforce mask mandates
idk if Iâll ever be trusted here
Iâm just not here enough
i wonder if the number of âcan i have a hugâ people has gone down since covid started
Let's go in voice
uh oh
ok 
Look Moonbears it's just like
Is it really unsafe to go back to schools
I enjoy dominating the discussion
Even if everyone is fully vaccinated
And over voice it's easy for me to do that
if you're vaccinated no, it's fairly safe all things considered
And also not idiots
So yeah
what's still unsafe is like
You guys are joining me in voice