#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 88 of 1
Lmao
This can be a gradual change.
I use capital theta when I am doing maths for fun for π/2 if that helps @storm sage
i promise you it's useless
Just helps in writing trigonometric identities mainly easily though
im a "piist" if you want to call me that purely because i live in a pi world
Like $\sin(\Theta) = 1$ or $\cos(\Theta) = 0$
Nidhi
im officially a piist and amuist because of finnboltz
engineers dont care about sig figs
sig figs don't sound like they taste good.
Amu is stupid.
So now the real question is... is amukhl constant?
What does that even mean?
The constant.
idk ask them XD
i made a new cpnstnat
amu
here
The constant is stupid.
ikr
thats why people use pi and tau
but now because of this bs
i will be pretty and use pi
only
A stupid constant invented by amukh1. It's equal to 2tau.
That seems kinda useful to me
Ratio between a sphere's surface area and its radius squared
Right
Especially because it actually deals with the dimensions we live in
why do we need a "circle constant" when we live in 3 dimensions
mhm
a sphere constant makes more sense @neat lintel
fr
oh wow he would haate this guy
Circles are more fundamental than spheres.
S^0 is the most fundamental space
Circles are spheres
Almost every other space contains some copy of it
A circle is a continuous curve.
A sphere is a continuous surface
Lol
so is literally every other continuous curve
Spheres are less fundamental than circles.
Harpz chose chaos
Why?
[citation needed]
alr guys in a couple days my website amuday will be out
Circles are easily constructed and defined.
So are spheres
They have more dimensions.
Circles are a special type of sphere
Btw spheres are the same definition as a circle
Take your 4-dimensional compass and construct a sphere.
Tell us about your website
Youre just coping that you cant say a circle has the correct number of dimensions
bascially its tauday.com except with the best constant ever
4 ball
Because a sphere does
It's 1-dimensional.
$\mathbb{N} = {\vartheta \vartheta^{-1}, 2 \vartheta \vartheta^{-1}, \dots }$
amukh1 | JS fanboy
Nuh uh
I don't understand
screw the natural numbers, nows its the amu-natural numbers
*blows a bubble*
like tell you about my actual website or the joke one im talking about rn
and nothing else that is real is 1-dimensional
the joke one isnt real
so spheres are better becayse they exist and are the correct number of dimensions
Either lol but I didn't get the joke because I haven't been chatting here
so basically
finn hates pi
omg
hes an avid fan of https://tauday.com and basically i am pretending to make my own constant
this is the perfect conversational context to bring up the glome in
Why does that menu rotate @solar hawk
idk thought it looked cool
it doesnt have buttons tho
Pi is fine
whats that mean
ye i like pi and tau
he is pusing for basically tau only idk whats up w that
I like amu
me too
I agree with Michael Hartl.
ong amu rule all of the constants
i read the article a long time ago and thought it was cool
i dont live by it tho
Some feedback: I'm impressed you know how to do it but it's a little irritating. But maybe someone will appreciate it
2010?
like i care more about dino chicken nuggies
im 15
🪩 <- glome
What's your favorite constant
ill prolly make a new webs soon cuz it old
15 ???? You are sooo young

i like e
Correct opinion
You should make little hover texts because I have no idea what these icons mean lol
3
3 is good
well if i were trying to get hired by a company i assume they would know
When did you read the article?
idk
definitely long ago enough i cant remember it
i watched a yt video on it
Isn't that pi ?
"pi is wrong"
That's also e
Do you mean Vihart's video?
The most beautiful equation in maths
idk
$3^{i3} = -1$
Nidhi
lmao
Is this true?
thats so cursed
omg wtf is that
my eyes died jus now at that LOL
Ah come on, @solar hawk u could have told its true and it would be much more fun
i used to think physicists were called physicians
lmao
it would have been
Hilarious.
What actually is 3^3i?
1 is my fav
It's equal to 27^i.
tbf this is pretty close to -1
3^(3i) = e^(i 3 log 3) = cos(3 log 3) + i sin(3 log 3)
obv
Prove Euler's Formula.
binomial theorem
It's by definition
Sorry, thats not one of the four proofs of math
whats that
Dammit stupid super reacitons
This is very unsatisfying.
if your grad+ shouldnt you be able to prove it
I'm only up to derivatives in calculus.
how tf r u gonna get grad+ then lol
I won't until later.
why apply now
I did?
You can motivate it by Taylor expansions
But you'd need another semester of calculus
Why do the expansions for sine and cosine work?
isnt calc 1 and calc 2 yearly courses?
Not in a typical uni
search taylor series proof idk
They are based on the derivatives of sine and cosine
if you want something "satisfying"
I understand the derivatives of sine and cosine well. How can you get these series from them?
Do you know how to do linear approximations of functions?
it's not too hard to define sin and cos on R in terms of angles
What are those?
For example if x is small, f(x) is approximately f(0) + f'(0)x
So sin x is approximately sin 0 + (cos 0)x, which is just x
and it's not too hard to show this agrees with the power series definition on R
What exactly does f'(0)x mean?
f'(0) multiplied by x
so it's not so sinful to extend them to C via the power series
its the point-slope form of a line
Why do linear approximations of functions work?
finnboltz at it again 
f'(a) is the derivative of f at a
and then using the power series it it's super easy to show euler's formula if you use the power series definition of exp
y - y1 = m(x-x1)
ofc you might not like that definition of exp
It's the definition of the derivative
A function is differentiable if and only if this linear approximation works
If there's no linear approximation, we say it's not differentiable
then y = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a)
Like for example |x| is not differentiable at x=0
but there are other ones (perhaps only on R) that are nice and you can show they agree with the power series definition
By "this linear approximation works" I mean the resulting error between the original function and the linear approximation goes to zero faster than x does, in the sense that the limit of error(x) / x = 0
so yeah euler's formula is somewhat interesting if approached from that angle
I don't quite understand what e is.
sir gimme an example where that limit = 1
[\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(x+h)- (f(x) + f'(x)h)}{h} = 0]
e is just exp(1)
This the formal way of saying that the error goes to 0 faster than h does
|x| gets u 1 right
eulerERICteristic
e is the number such that d/dx e^x = e^x
The value depends on what the linear approximation you choose is, but if the function isn't differentiable, then there's no reasonable linear approximation to choose
the exponential function on R can be defined as the unique Lie group homomorphism f from R to R^+ with f'(0)=1
this is perhaps a more "moral" definition
do we have some structures where there are multiple valid approximations
than the power series
So, the slope of the tangent line to the graph of e^x is e^x?
uh
the slope of the tangent line of e^x at a is e^a
How can you show that e is the sum of the reciprocals of the factorials?
by utilising math exchange
idk
i just know it true
its just the definition
of e
there is no show
Sounds like a job for stack exchange
like i dont show amu = 2tau, i define it to be so
Why should these definitions be equivalent?
oh ye its easier to prove the first one i told u
d/dx e^x = e^x is prolly easier than this
go try it out ok
it's not obvious
come back in 6 hrs if u couldnt
it takes work
I don't know much about infinite series.
How to study Physics Electricity, particularly AC circiuts and all of dat things?
Hmmm I don't know of any such structures
They would have to be weird though

A space that can't tell apart linear functions is.....
it probably would be a good idea to start in an introductory physics textbook, I think Halladay is a pretty good one. If you're looking for more of a focus on actual Electricity and Magnetism, Griffiths is a good introductory book VERY readable. Some of the more standard circuit books are out there, like Nilsson could be approachable if you're looking for circuit theory.
What's the top space where there can be multiple limits?
another textbook I found that explains the concepts well is Young and Freedman university physics.
Are you currently taking a physics class?
I don't think I'm ready to learn series in calculus.
this certainly happens with indistinguishable points
i think non-hausdorff is sufficient though maybe
line with 2 origins satisfies that
Hmm ok
Unironically the best circuits textbook I've read is allaboutcircuits.com
circus
https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/ @potent mason you might find this helpful :)
Not sure if it's sufficient but it's definitely necessary
saving this so I can pass it along to others. Thank you!
yeah im using words stupidly
Np! Thank the creators of this website, it's really great
I feel like it should be sufficient if your space is first-countable. If x, y don't have any disjoint open neighborhoods, then you can have a sequence hitting all the intersections of the open neighborhoods or something
Don't quote me on that, my general topology is still kinda bad
Oh it's just saying that around every point, you only need countably many things to characterize the neighborhoods
Often you need this condition when working with sequences because you only get countably many elements
Every metric space is first-countable, so it doesn't really matter when starting out
But eventually, topologists like to move from sequences to a more general notion called nets which basically sidesteps this issue of countability :)
point set 
I'm trying to understand this intuition along with wiki's defn but well
I can get this but well it doesnt really mean much to me
Yeah I think the best way to understand it is to think of a space which isn't first-countable and then see what breaks in it. I gotta do something else rn though, but I'll come back to this later if you're up for it.
waw
After a course on point-set topo, I must say the notion of neighbourhood is still one that causes me most trouble
Especially if it's local compactness. Most intuition goes right out of window
Maybe I’m just a victim of the Dunning Kruger effect, but I sort of felt like the basics in topology like open sets, neighborhoods, and compactness were pretty intuitive
I mean I guess it gets weird with some of the weird topological spaces and what neighborhoods look like there
Its great tbh
They're intuitive for me for R^n
Not necessarily other topological spaces
Metric spaces you can lean super heavy into the metric
is a topology induced by a metric always T2
If the metric is non discrete I think so
doesnt discrete netric induce discrete topology is T2?
Yeah, in fact every metric topology is T6.
Most importantly they're "normal" which says not only can any 2 points be separated by open sets, but any 2 disjoint closed sets can be separated by open sets.
Ohhh is it called normal because topologys induced by a norm are that
that would be quite awesome if thats why
otherwse it would just be fine
Pretty cool tho tq for answer
No, mathematicians are just bad at naming stuff
yhhh
it would be especially infuriating tho if like. norm =/> normal. At least with the way things are at the moment we have sanity, and norm => metric => normal topology
Not true
Naming becomes harder to do
Okay but "regular" and "normal"? lol
What is your education level in math/ whats one thing you are currently studying?
Honestly people make fun of the T axioms but I prefer T3 and T4 to regular and normal
Is this related to the current convo or the start of a new convo
tfw people only name hausdorff
Current convo
kolmogorov and frechet malding
But its because im curious
I'm an undergraduate. I'm currently learning differential topology and algebraic topology.
Oh great
The craziest name I could think of in AT?
Actually the names of spectral sequences I never learned differences between them
I think I only learned what Serre’s one is
The name isn’t enlightening at all though
But idk what other name I would give to those concepts
Or something like homotopy for example, I dont know if thats considered a bad name or not
Is that what it means?
Homo means similar and topy is deformation?
Nah i made that up
Naming is just harder and the convention of using peoples names in definitions feels antiquated.
But I like it personally but it makes math way too inclusive and it’s impossible to change this anyways
its called Hausdorff because the points can be hausd orff into disjoint open sets
so true bestie
i read that in a book once and its so fun
This is funny
Every dwarf has their own little house
homo means same and top means shape
I guess top means more like place
But I think it's analogous
How do people find out connections between applied and pure math
Or is it applied math people searching for things?
The most recent thing that comes to mind that I thought was cool was something PCA adjacent called UMAP where David Spivak wrote something about fuzzy simplcial sets that is being used to address issues with the idea
I dont know of any examples of pure people going out of their way for the applied people though
Does anyone have any?
I would say that all math is pure math first
If you happened to find some application for it beyond, "just because," then it becomes applied
So if you're saying an applied mathematician's work is helping pure mathematicians
I would assume that simply means their application is also on the forefront of pure math
Pure mathematicians figure things out and then applications are sometimes discovered way later
But all of the framework is laid out because the pure mathematicians figured that out just because they wanted to
There was some example of physicists retrofitting a fleshed out mathematical framework that fit their problem i can't remember the exact story
But basically pure mathematicians worked out all the properties of a certain system and many years later a physical application for this Pure Math construct was discovered
In other words the pure mathematicians help out the applied people by working out all the details to all the questions and scenarios that nobody else ever wondered about
And then applied fields often have the generations of groundwork mathematics established for them as a result
This isnt how things go though.
Its not that pure mathematicians figure out every single detail that the applied mathematicians start cherry picking. The example I gave is an example of an invented applied math concept but to help prove a certain aspect of it pure math was being applied
But how can you say applied math is not a subset of.pure math you know
?
man ppl arguing about pure vs applied
I wasnt talking about that though?
No one is arguing that? Why dont you read my original post?
Its the same at many places for undergrad
But you specialize if you study further or in your career
And maybe just have a preference lol
There are many classic examples like Euler Lagrange equations for principle of least action or Einstein developing Brownian Motion
I dodged all the applied courses
I guess you can count the creation of distribution theory and generalized functions theory as consequence of the fact that physicists were using dirac delta function when it wasn't a function in the first place and there was no theory about it
Oh damn thats a good example
I forgot about this and I never learned much about what distributions were formally, only in passing. It somehow was mentioned in a differential topology class but I forgot context. I think it had something to do with vertical and horizontal decomposition of tangent spaces
I think there are probably some good examples we may take for granted
Especially if you stretch it across history
in a historical context splitting hairs between pure and applied is really just a waste of time
Yeah that was not the intention
The point is that there are somewhat more clear delineations now even though its fuzzy
And the example I gave its obvious who was pure or applied
The umap thing is really cool since the development is as recent as 2020
the specific instances where one field inspires another definitely exists
but thats just how acad works?
The umap thing is coolest imo since it uses category language to help show an equivalence between different metric realizations
Yeah its hard to see that sometimes
like i get ct is this woaah abstractions silly thing and every time its used in a paper it gets added to a reddit post rundown
Yeah I know how buzzywordy it can be
Like 'vibrations' and 'consciousness' are New Age hippie buzzwords.
don't forget "toxins, impurities, energy"
a lot of math couldnt be done without language of categories. Its used in papers very often
but if u dont give any context at all for what pure and applied means then it might as well as mean nothing
You could also make your own interpretations?
One YouTube channel called 'Spirit Science' mentioned 'vibrations of consciousness'. What does that even mean?
thats... not how communication works lmao
Like a nearest neighbor generalization on manifolds is arguably applied math
i push this vibe actly
This is how all communication works?
for just talking in everyday life
i dont want to clarify about every little detail
but when ure discussing stuff like science and shit then at least try lmao
We’re all connnected through the quantum consciousness guys
You dont need and you never do?
Thats a weird attitude to have I wont lie
Not everything has clear delineations in math or science
let's be honest, if you pull out a random math paper, chances are there won't be any category theory
If its in geometry then it will?
yea and u avoid using those terms
thats standard practice in any field
No you dont lol?
There are tons of newer math ideas with lots of interpretations
An example is mirror symmetry
then that's super specific, lol. Cat theory was created for alg topo, geometry benefited from it naturally
If you ask 3 profs what it is they can give you 3 different perspectives
listen mate u asked a question about whether theres "connections between applied and pure math"
No it is t super specific?
My first introduction to category theory was actually when learning about the dual vector space not being naturally isomorphic
Most of algebraic geometry relies on category language so what you are saying is very unfounded
There is also plenty of overlap between fields
Did I make myself clear? I said cat theory was created for it, hence why it's so common
and i think its a nothing burger cause the line that splits pure and applied is one out of convenience
it doesnt say anything about the qualities of the field
Do you think my question was to do this though?
Do you know what my question was?
Then you should retract the any random math paper statement
They never mentioned category theory a single time i never heard of it from any professor or grad student or otherwise throughout my whole math major
I'm sure its incredibly important and useful and ubiquitous but it doesnt seem necessary for a lot of significant results
what? no, my point stands. if you take a random math paper, chances are it's not gonna be about alg geometry.
And cat theory is not commonly seen outside alg geometry
honestly idk what im even arguing against at this point if u wanted more examples like umap then cheers fam
I went to school about 7 years ago it seems category theory is more popular recently
To be talked about
Its the opposite. Transparent Element gave an example im looking for
Please try to understand or clarify if you don’t understand what I was saying. I would be glad to help and answer questions
First time it showed up for me was in grad algebra class when talking about homology
The professor did ANT
sorry i didnt invest time into reading ur textwall fam. didnt rly think it was that important
Most of my school was NT, Dynamical Systems, and math physcis
If you dont have anything constructive please dont respond next time
It doesnt show up in a lot of math but for a good chunk of other math its used in the definition for every object
The language of category theory is meant for that which is great
But when you want to define certain objects CT is the only language you can use versus ZFC set theory language
Typical example being the definition for a scheme in AG
lmfao then how about this one, the entire field of real analysis was a pure field developed for describing functions
symplectic geometry was developed for classical mechanics
This is like honestly the type of thing i immediately think when i hear "what have pure mathematicians done?"
Uhhh they fucking figured out how to do everything related to numbers in your field haha
yea like a large amnt of abstraction is an abstraction of "something"
so ud expect a large amnt of them to start from some "applied field"
The story is more complicated than that but I was also aiming for more recent examples. The example transparent element gave was good, but I am curious about modern day things
Well im not
modern day? like 21st century stuff?
Or 20th
They'll have the years of experience in the relevant fields to give you great examples
nobody knows how the dependencies are for contemporary acad its all fucked up
Yeah I have a feeling some people do but its really hard to keep track of
And there doesnt seem to be any consistent tools for doing it either
Creation of knot theory was from the effort to classify knots a very, very long time ago. Most foundational papers in this field are in 20th century
No academia is a mess
It would be cool if academia had more documentation on this for the amount of work they do
Many of prominent researchers whose names are with essential tools are still alive and working
You are joking right?
If the classes i have seen as a tutor are any indication there is no order or accountability to half of what is being done in higher ed
Math at least you can usually grade objectively xD
examples from what i know is that "very real physics" was the backbone for developing gauge theory
This becomes less and less true
every field related to computers wuld fit ur bill as well
For example, in a very recent development, Lisa Piccirillo used something to prove that Conway knot is not slice, called Rasmussen's s-invariant
I did get some courses with projects at upper level where i was graded subjectively I can't lie
And sure enough, Rasmussen is alive and well, just created this tool maybe 10-20-ish years ago. He's teaching in UK, Oxford iirc
but again finding examples where u can historically track "this inspired that" runs very short and frays all over the place the more u get to modern examples
i think itd be harder to find fields or concepts that abstractise a single "thing"
This isn’t exactly what I asked but its close
Not about inspiration but more about directly helping another field
Another example maybe with Pachter and Sturmfels. They are mathematicians, but went out to help biologists.
ok but like what does that mean
do u mean linked by citations
Almost every developments we have in the study of RNA can be traced back of many of their papers back in 1970s
they really made the effort to create math models for it
Yeah thats the closest
Or don't ask me. Ask Edward Witten.
Like I imagine if there are important conversations that happen between two academics in different fields and then one decides to change projects and start going another way
Maybe not as dramatic but something similar
in that case u rly wuld have to ask acads in the field
I think there was some lady that stopped being math professor to study neurology and wrote an influential paper recently
Tbh, I would cite my own works because they are probably the closest things I can find atm 😄 but I am not that pompous
Yeah ill have an opportunity next year
id imagine everyone has at least one or two memorable interactions they can talk abt with a "im not sure if this is what u asked for but"
Yeah right
If you are still in school id ask you to ask one of your professors and report to me
Isnt that serious tho
tfw rasmussen
also no, cambridge
smh, not like I care about UK anyway
my rasmussen impression goes crazy
Was 20x3 bru😭
What does that mean?
like boards?
uhh
they're like
the main exams you have in school whcih actually matter
but not for college applications
I hate exams
yeah most people do
i try to concnentrate on school so i get good baord marks
so i do really bad in coaching
What is coaching?
To do good in coaching+school, you must have good retaining capacity. So you don't have to study again and just review notes.
What is coaching?
yeah thats the thing...
i dont
i dont know whcih to contentrate on though
im in 10th
Institutions where people go to study for olympiads and mostly entrance exams like JEE or NEET at the not so small cost of 500,000Rs< for 4-3 years.
My personal experience is your time should be spent on JEE/NEET
Board should be studied 1 day before the relevant exam
Board is like JEE \union irrelevant crap
uhh its icse so
Skipping irrelevant crap can still get you like 90
NCERT based exams are pretty elementary so don't worry about them. Schools often make their tests difficult than the actual board paper.
Ah my condolences
Dorime~
its kidna hard to get above 90 wihtou8thj studying
My thing applies to CBSE only, ig
in isce
ICSE is a completely different can of worms
Definitely.
Plus people only look at your raw marks, ig. It's easier to score in CBSE
I would have to break pots in zelda for decades to get that amount of rupees
It is a significant amount
Plus foreign colleges don't really care about which board you come from, cbse, icse or ib. Just be at the top 5-10% of your class.
Yeah ICSE is like hard mode with no benefits
And have a good profile, bag some olympiads. Take the SAT.
Something like 1L people get 490+ in CBSE iirc
Oh god more college apps stuff. I hate that crap it's so unfair
Yeah.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/cbse-class-x-results-2-3-lakh-get-90-95-percenters-double/articleshow/69209440.cms
Ok, 50k is 475
Do you want to learn or do you want to get into a good college without overstressing yourself
but the people in my coahcing are a bit
hwo do you say it
rowdy
no offense
learn
People being people. There are good CBSE schools too y'know.
I've switched from ICSE to IGCSE and ultimately landed at CBSE.
whcih would you suggest
People from CBSE have also gotten into MIT.
There was some kid in allen who got letters from MIT, oxford, and some other uni I can't remember.
Currently? Yes.
us
Yeah one of my classmates got into MIT
God dayum.
Just do well in whatever you try.
That will totally doxx lmao
fine wtv
I'm in [redacted]? Which state are you in?
Yeah.
Hey, can anyone suggest a difficult math problem related to a parabola ax^2+b
Compute an arc length parametrization of the parabola
I was just thinking about Arc length parameterization
compute the difference in height between the focus and where a line of slope 1 is tangent
Is tau better than pi?
Take the worst of both worlds: pau
Is pau 3tau/4?
Which is equal to 3tau/4.
No, it's 1 pau
I prefer ti, sqrt(pi*tau)
I mean, for one circles are geometrical so we should be taking the geometric mean
plus it has the feature of being equal to sqrt(2pi^2)=sqrt(2)pi is beautiful how it combines the diagonal of a unit square length
I mean wow
amazing
unifying squares and circles as one
Surely π+e
2pi comes up a lot more often in math than pi does, but changing standards is only ever worth it if the change makes a big difference. having 2's in some places is not a big inconvenience for just about anyone who regularly uses pi
It's not that much work.
so "better" but not better enough
spring > summer
Surely having it in March is better so that people can celebrate it in school
Nein
Ja
If it were in the summer, when would you get together with other math people to celebrate it
Summer is better than spring, spring is the worst season
funny I was just reading about a compromise for some old networking standard where they proposed 32 bytes or 64 bytes, and the committee compromised on 48 bytes lmao
You're both nutters, fall is the best season
I prefer 'autumn'
Spring is second best and summer is worst
fall sounds disasterous
Fall is better than summer, but winter is best
Wow
Having it in summer is better
Not where I live.
Because it promotes seeking knowledge yourself, and year round learning to help combat the common atrophy of knowledge during summer months in children
That's what you get for choosing the wrong hemisphere to spawn in
What if I'm on the equator
Then you win
Do Flat-Earthers deny the existence of the Equator?

Why do they believe Earth is flat?
They were not taught Riemannian geometry in school
I need to learn Riemannian and PseudoRiemannian geometry
God told me to
If a Flat-Earther ever tells you the ocean would fall off if Earth were spherical, ask them 'But where would it fall to?'.
flat earthers don't exist
They do.
nope
😉
That's a perfect way to mislead someone into thinking you're a flerf. Look up 'Myth of the Flat Earth'.
I didn't like the idea of flat earth before
But now that I know they're called flerfs
I think ill look into it more seriously
Why don't you seriously look into why people think insects aren't animals?
Okay
we already know they're not
Let's start with a simpler question
ultra was just showing us some diagrams earlier
Insects are animals.
I guess I could believe it
That's not an animal, that's a robot made to look like an animal.
exactly
It's not an insect.
like you said, it's not an animal, that's a flerffing robot
But why do people think insects aren't animals?
nobody thinks that
this is another strawman for the intellectually lazy to procrastinate attacking
find real enemies (not me)
Many people do.
name one
You'll find some here: https://www.reddit.com/r/polls/comments/u72xa6/are_insects_animals/
they're trollin
They aren't. They genuinely think insects aren't animals.
then go ask them, what are you doin here asking me
The post is closed.
I'll do that.
Why do people think spiders are insects?
An octopus is a cephalopod mollusc, not an arthropod like an arachnid.
oh? regardless :2
I bet spider taste like crab but I'm too grossed out to find out
They're both arthropods.
So they probably do then?
You know those 17 year locusts
I bet you could fry those up
They have those dehydrated shrimps
At the grocery store
oh throw them in ramen
thats fly soup
waiter there are not enough flies in my soup
fly soup
Good day
hi meir
Hi muhammad
Hi
No
Hiiiya meir
You go back
Me ?
Yes
Who else
I didn't even do anything 

good day
I didnt have any
Why not
Was engaged in this biology discussion with someone
who thinks cladistics is everything
Oh
"invertebrate" doesnt make sense

and "tau" is better than pi
The word 'invertebrate' doesn't have any justification to exist.
Hello, inarthropod. What do you have in common with a jellyfish, you ask? Well, you both lack jointed legs and a chitinous exoskeleton.
finnboltz
Thats his message for everyone
My legs are jointed
Ig Ill muffle da voice meir
Yes
They aren't segmented, though, in the same way arthropod legs are.
yeah
Isn't 'inarthropod' a silly word?
So ig meir this channel has been affected too
Thats because YOU created it, not the scientific community.
We need a password on Discussion 2
We need to construct a hazmat only area
Hm
And the hazmats are the ones we wear at the 100pc mortality hospital
We could go to a restricted channel if I was active role 
There's no such thing as an 'invertebrate'.
We'll move to
yeeee pull up w da hazmat suit
yeh
Do all inarthropods need to do so?
<@&268886789983436800> check his message log, why is he deleting and repeat pinging me with his message. I received the information once, and I need not reply.
@neat lintel
This behaviour is annoying
As annoying as the word 'invertebrate'.
You're blocked.
24h mute, stop being annoying
Asking for a reference... Does anyone know what $\mathbb{Z}_n^{\times}$ means?
pilgrim
It is a kind of group, but I don't know what group exactly.
Also, $\mathbb{Z}_0^{\times}$ is supposed to have order 2. I suppose this means it has 2 elements.
pilgrim
I am studying this in the context of Euler's totient function.
It's the group of units of Z_n
Thanks. What is Z_n?
Where did you see this written?
I am doing a summer project formalizing Euler's totient function in Agda. So I have to learn a bit of its background. This is where I first see it mentioned:
You probably won't need any more information on ring theory to get this done
But that being said, you may indeed need to pick up a book on number theory
Some books write U(n) instead of Z_n^\times, so perhaps you've seen that
But most if not all use the notation Z_n or Z/nZ
Hmmm, but the way Z/nZ is defined, I don't see how Z/0Z has 2 elements, as modulo 0 is not well-defined.
Well, writing Z_0 is very unusual, but as it happens it is totally well-defined.
Z_0 is, by the typical definition of modulo and of quotient rings, just Z.
What definition did you have in mind?
Oh but I see another issue
Z_0 does not have two elements
OK, thanks, I inferred the definition from n >= 2.
Z_0^\times does
@hollow hatch if you're still around:
I'll do just one of the two terms.
2021 is 5 mod 7. We use mod 7 here because we're interested in the divisibility of the result mod 7.
2022 is 0 mod 6. We use mod 6 here because when multiplying 5 under mod 7, you require 6 multiplications to return to 5. 5 -> 25 = 4 -> 20 = 6 -> 30 = 2 -> 10 = 3 -> 15 = 1 -> 5 (this is what I was talking about earlier about the multiplicative group of Z/7Z).
So we arrive at 2021^2022 = 5^0 mod 7 = 1.
You can do something similar with the second term, then finally after adding you just have to do one more exponent.
Sorry about the delay, I had to take care of irl stuff.
It's i already figured it out my teacher explained it to me. Thanks she didn't use this method it's a lot easier
Thanks
What's the study.
Today I'm on the Level 6 Exam review, and almost done with it. It's the final exam review that would place me in Calc 1 when I enter college, which is what I want so badly.
I think I started at Level 3 maybe 2.5 weeks ago?
When I started I didn't know basic things, like how to subtract/divide fractions, simple trig stuff, etc.
But now I'm doing a lot of trig and it's not that bad, and a lot of other harder stuff like logarithms.
I wish I had learned this stuff in high school honestly because I'd probably be flying through it now
but I am optimistic and enjoying the process

Is it just me or does anyone else like discords old username system better
dude
are you living under a rock? literally everyone hated this change 
it's just been a while so the outrage has died down
Hes been living under a metamorphic rock
I didn't change my username 
stay strong 💪
I just click the notification away everytime I log in
Lol I'm glad you're enjoying the process because I'm going through hell rn.
😔
enjoying it matters the most, you'll get through it trust
thank you 😄
What he said
my fiancé is bringing me home sweet treats from a bakery, sugar and dough will be the perfect math fuel 
vegan chocolate macadamia cookie, key lime bar, and an eclair 😋
lucky
I am very lucky. I definitely need it after all this studying
I don’t think I’m gonna get the chance to eat my dinner until tmr tbh. The pork’s been brining for a good amount of time, but I’m still making the marinade that ima put it in afterward
Lmk how ur goodies go
I will, and you too. That sounds really good
Key lime bar? I thought only lemon bars existed.
bruhhh
but good thing you know what a fridge is

It’s cuz i didn’t start around or before 10AM
That’s reasonable
I haven’t been eating much
I think I’ve had about 600 calories today and i honestly dgaf
I sleep in the next 3-5 hours too
I didn't breakfast, didn't really eat lunch, but ate 2 pastry thingies bread cheese and popcorn at dinner, hell nah that ain't healthy lol
I’m still alive and weightlifting while I do that 🤷
As long as I don’t feel like i need to go to the hospital it’s wtv
Nice dinner choice
thanks, sorta ate what I could get
600 calories ain't much tho
Yeah ik
unless you forgot a digit
If I forgot a digit, I would need to rethink my dating life
ah nvm I'm tired, I didn't read the text above
lul
idk, average calory intake should be at around 3200
how is one supposed to achieve that
3200 is a lot unless you’re active at the gym
ok maybe google is shitting at me
If you’re pretty sedentary and you want to stay around the same weight i don’t recommend going that far above 2000
Unless you have a really fast metabolism
eating and drinking when being hungry and thirsty is mostly fine I guess
assuming you have a healthy hunger sensation
My meal today has been one slice of pizza, one thingy of cheesey bread, and a quarter of a tostada
They are all leftovers
Me making food is declaring I don’t wanna eat pizza a third day in a row
that's good
there's awful sugar days, but I sometimes just can't help it, some days I ago I started eating like cake followed up with energy thruout the day an occasional cacao, other sweety drinks, a damn pudding and other stuff I can't remember
Everyone has awful sugar days. It’s when you have them too often that it’s cause for concern
One sugar day spaced far apart from the last sugar day is a part of living a happy life
if u have too many bad sugar days u might get type 2 diabetes like me
though that’s years of bad eating tbh
I never thought I would get this problem, I had to study so much haha https://imgur.com/a/46af6la
I didn't even know what a unit circle was
This has been the hardest problem yet, but now I think I've got it down
The unit circle… enemy of high school and college students everywhere
I learned a neat trick from a reddit comment about using your palm (facing you) to calculate the coordinates (cosine/sine) easily
that helped a lot honestly
It's silly tricks like that that carry me
I need to be able to see a pattern myself to learn something
I would be most pleased if thou wouldst demonstrate this for me.
Oh yeah let me get back on my PC real quick. I was taking a study break to lie down lol
here it is
Comment copy and pasted in case anyone doesn't want to visit the link:
Hold your left hand out in front of you, palm facing you. Your pinky is 0 degrees and thumb is 90. You other fingers represent 30 45 and 60 degrees. You count sin starting from your pinky and cos from your thumb. The numer of finger you count is the radical and it's always over 2. Thus;
Sin 30 = from pinky 1 finger away =1/2
Cos 45 = from thumb 2 fingers away = sqrt(2)/2```
I tried a bit of each of the treats. The eclair wasn't the best eclair I had, but it was huge and still yummy. The keylime bar was too strong imo. The tiramisu was awesome, and the vegan chocolate nut cookie was the best treat.
Treat feedbacks r what I live for
Now that u said key lime bar is too strong I wanna try it
I like lemon/lime
I love lemon/lime and strong flavors, but boy was it powerful. I think if there was a bit more crust it'd be easier to eat.
tiramisu is hands down the best dessert
hi
and i will not take any dissent on this
I'm new
hello siddyboy
Can anybody tell me what can we do here?
hi ryc
the discussion channels / chill are just for random discussions, sometimes involving math, sometimes not so much
there's a help section above where you can ask questions or help others, see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions
below, there are topic channels for particular kinds of math, including channels for undergraduate / graduate level math classes
ok thnx
enjoy yourself
okayy
This was my first time trying it and it was great
Malnutrition -> Brain damage
i have had many tiramisus in many forms across several nations
panna Cotta>>>>
a good tiramisu captures the perfect mix of the warmth of a fuzzy, disembodied nostalgia and the chilly shivers of culinary sublimity
That sentence alone is a culinary masterpiece
a good panna cotta, on the other hand, is just bearably edible enough to allow the diner to eat it without vomiting
🤢
woah
I've always wanted to try it after seeing it on Bob's Burgers funny enough haha. I've never seen it illustrated or IRL before that.
Only ever heard of it and bad descriptions of it lol.
It's p good. Lemme see @nimble crest wax poetic about cheesecake next
I'm ryc, I'm from nyc. Our food is better than yours. Cope.
wrong ryc
umm, well i have a lot of opinions about cheesecake
but they're more vulgar
most importantly, it's not a fucking cake
except for burnt basque cheesecake or those japanese cheescakes, which are cakes
i think cheesecake is really good but A. easy to fuck up and B. overrated (i previously overrated it as well)
I’m diabetic and I wish I still could eat multiple slices of cheesecake
No I definitely am not
Not you
Oh
im a food snob
I was like what do u have against me lol
Oh
thats a point of pride
You do seem like an authority on the matter
How would you classify cheesecake if it ain’t a cake
it's a tart
Google agrees with you
It's sorta a custard right
I haven't made it in a hot minute but don't you use a shit ton of eggs
ur a tart
Welp I'm going to bed for tonight. I'll have all day tomorrow and the next day to study, and then the exam. I have 5 more questions on the review to learn and then I'm going to measure myself by taking the review while timed, with just a calculator. Hopefully that test goes well and I can review any questions I get wrong/have forgotten.
I think it's going to be tedious though because to review I basically have to press "get similar question" on all, but they only let you do that every 5 seconds so I have to wait in between to refresh the exam or just click retry as I go. I'm steering away from the latter because if I see my previous answers at all I'm sure it'll influence my results.
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Hi everyone,
I hope that I am asking on the correct channel.
How can I learn mathematical thinking beyond solving math exercises? I want to understand and achieve a high mastery in Calculus I, II, III, linear algebra and analysis in the following academic year. So far (end of 2nd year) I have learnt some parts of Calculus I, II, and III, but not as rigorously, because I am an economics student. Next year I will learn them more thoroughly in an econometrics/statistics department. So far I got ~ 3.0/4.0 GPA from my math courses and 3.6/4.0 from my stats/econometrics courses.
Do you know maybe any courses that could help? Or are there any learning techniques that you use and you found them helpful?
What is the severity of malnutrition necessary for the brain to have noticeable (and irreversible) impacts? I am perfectly healthy atm. The closest things I got r serious cases of malnutrition need to occur for at least 3 months, and in extreme cases of anorexia brain damage may occur
Long story short I am not worried about my brain. Especially when I know I have access to more food that I’m not afraid to eat the moment I understand my body needs the vitamins and minerals
Being short on calories for a day definitely doesn't cause malnutrition lmao.
it might cause you to be hungry though
I have found a lot more help in reddit comments and this server than in any of the educational videos they provide on the review lol.
My learning style is so different from how they expect me to learn, probably because I'm autistic. They seem to just want me to memorize things, but I can't memorize things. I need to be able to derive them myself, and then I'll understand.
Like I had no clue why a reference angle of 30 degrees would have sides 2, 1, and sqrt(3), but it's obvious now when I think of it in terms of sine and the unit circle. If the sine that correlates to 30 degrees on the unit circle is 1/2, then of course the hypotenuse is 2 and the opposite side is 1, and then I can figure out radical 3 from there.
I can draw the whole unit circle now from "memory" after only learning it yesterday, but that's only because I found a pattern that works for me. I know how to get all the degrees, so I can just calculate the radians which are otherwise confusing to me in their pattern, and I can easily get the coordinates with that palm trick (which I don't even need anymore cause I learned the pattern).
When I initially saw it I was so daunted because the video expected me to just memorize it all lol.
Without telling me why it is like it is.
Anyway, back to studying 💪
hey
is there a name for this rule
like
if i divide any nonimaginary positive number by 2 or divide it by 2 i will eventually get
like 2-4 or like 4-8 or 8-16
it will always end up between all of those
nonimaginary positive number?
yes
do you mean positive reals?
yea

agreed
but like
does someone understand what i mean?
like if it was with 3 then it woukd be 3-9 9-27
they would always end up in these “hoops”
i call it hoop theory
lets goo no other math concept is called that
im gonna study it and write a book
Wat
you've just described exponentiating by 2
yes well sort of
if i multiply or divide a number a certain amount of times (by 2) it will always end up in certain hoops





