#book-recommendations

1 messages · Page 245 of 1

sage python
#

Corollary Perko is better

willow pecan
#

Daminark is a known troll

#

Anyways

sage python
#

Nah but yeah I've referenced Perko a bit for my analysis class and liked it

willow pecan
#

The main ODE theorem is Picard-Lindelof/Cauchy-Lipschitz

#

There isn't too much else going on

daring reef
#

Hmm not sure exactly but I think I'm most interested in applications of analysis to diffeqs

willow pecan
#

Tbh

#

PDE stuff depends very little on ODE knowledge

daring reef
#

Oh interesting

#

What topics do you think are relevant then?

willow pecan
#

Measure theory, functional analysis

#

Then it's just pde theory

#

Maybe numerical analysis if that's a perspective that interests you

daring reef
#

Are things like linear systems and existence/uniqueness of ODEs important? I feel like I should at least study those

willow pecan
#

The existence/uniqueness picture for ODEs is not terribly interesting

#

Tbh

#

And like

#

As long as you know how to turn a higher order ode into a system of first order equations, you'll be fine

daring reef
#

Oh ok lol

#

If I were to study ODEs just for the sake of knowledge do you have an idea of which route to take

willow pecan
#

Perko probably

daring reef
#

Cool thanks!

timber mesa
#

Perko is the useful ODEs imo lol

pure swallow
#

Can anyone recommend good maths books for grade 11 student?

stray veldt
#

if the former you would have to give some information about your curriculum

pure swallow
#

I want it for clearing concepts clearly

stray veldt
#

in general i think khanacademy is pretty good for all thing highschool

pure swallow
#

Ok ok wait ill show my maths curriculum is sets and relations, then inequalities, trigonometry, permutations and combinations, binomial theorem, complex numbers, lines, circles, parabolas, hyperbolas, ellipse, limits and derivatives, statistics, probability

stray veldt
#

if it has to be a book maybe serge lang's basic mathematics

pure swallow
#

And a few others i might hVe missed

pure swallow
stray veldt
#

didnt know its limited by countries

pure swallow
#

I have no idea xd

#

This is what i get

stray veldt
#

are you indian?

pure swallow
#

Yes

stray veldt
#

the order might be different but you can search for topics

pure swallow
#

Theres also options like this

stray veldt
#

ye, this is ordered for american school

#

but you can probably find some good stuff if you look a bit deeper

pure swallow
#

But u see like

#

When for example

#

I find some topics

#

Having very little info

stray veldt
#

i mean ok

daring reef
#

have you learned calculus?

pure swallow
stray veldt
#

there are some indian users here

#

maybe they can help you

daring reef
#

i think learning calc might be more interesting then, khan academy has a bunch of stuff for that

stray veldt
#

most of the stuff you listed would be covered by pre-calc and calc

pure swallow
stray veldt
#

with the exception of sets and relations and statistics and probability

#

so yes, start with pre-calc and then go to calculus on khan academy

#

if its to hard, start at algebra

#

if pre-calc is too easy go to calc

pure swallow
#

Ok ok thanks got it

stray veldt
#

maybe start at trig actually

daring reef
#

oh yeah if you havent done precalc yet it'd be better to just start with that

pure swallow
stray veldt
#

ok, then try pre-calc and calc

#

most of the calculus stuff is also in the book i mentioned "basic mathematics" by serge lang

#

if you prefer a book (and are fine with english)

pure swallow
#

Yes im fine with English lmao

stray veldt
#

ye

pure swallow
#

Ok will get this, in addition to khan academy

spiral night
#

does anyone have book recommendations for multivariable calc/diff equations

#

would you guys recommend stewart's mvc 8ed

lament sage
#

Any good statistics books which are more proof-oriented? Currently learning introductory statistics at my university, and while I don't need to know much beyond how and when to use the formulas given, I would like to get a better understanding of the material

marble solar
#

For hard stuff apostol is good

#

for slightly easier williamson & trotter is good

#

For standard stuff, I like Thomas University Calculus

spiral night
#

alright ill check those out, thank you

karmic thorn
whole rain
#

@karmic thorn nice role opencry

quick hornet
whole rain
#

oh, n i c ecatFone

wicked nymph
pure swallow
alpine wedge
#

guys pls best book for middle schooler

narrow talon
hasty turret
#

Are you 13+?

valid condor
prisma snow
#

Proof of Rotman basedness:

viral moth
#

any good books for analysis? i know epsilon-delta and def of continuity and a few oddities (so like weierstrass and dirichlet functions) and i have done a few exercises, but i am by far a noob at anal

prisma snow
#

You could try Rudin

#

Tbh, there isn't an analysis book that I really like. Just don't use Tao.

willow pecan
#

Rudin is not good for intuition and insight

#

Abbott is better

#

There are lots of analysis books out there

karmic thorn
#

Don't listen to Luna. Tao is good.

#

(In any case, you can try out different books and settle for one which clicks with you.)

willow pecan
#

Tao is wordy

karmic thorn
#

Wordy is good, depending on situation.

#

Wordiness is precisely what makes it better for beginners who are studying the subject by themselves with minimal help from anywhere else.

hasty turret
#

Tao could be good

#

Just skip 90% of the first book

karmic thorn
#

Tbh that's true

hasty turret
#

Most of the first book is literally useless filler

karmic thorn
#

It picks up steam with chapter 6

#

You can skim through 8

#

9,10,11 are absolutely cut to the chase

#

And then on to volume 2

brittle marsh
#

Opinions on category theory in context by Riehl?

willow pecan
#

Good I think

#

Riehl's pretty popular

stray veldt
#

its good bcs it requires you to know real math before you can read it

hearty steppe
#

Also there is a couple cool supplementary notes to Rudin out there that makes it not totally overwhelming. Many professors and academics out there spend a lot of time working thru Rudin and posting stuff about it online. Another advantage

On another side note, Abbott seems to follow Rudin a bit and break down some of the ambiguity so I would argue that it’s best to use both books together but go to Abbott when you get stuck in Rudin

#

But also Schroder is a good text. Not many people have checked that one out. Classic Abhijeets recommendation

#

I would also say that perhaps Abbott sometimes breaks things down too much and makes it misleading to not think much more in depth about each theorem

marble grotto
hearty steppe
#

Oh yea Bergman is great

#

Silvia as well

#

Like with resources like those notes that those professors took years to craft from Rudin, you have a real Arsenal here

willow pecan
#

I believe that books should be relatively self contained

#

If a book needs all of these supplemental materials, then...

gray gazelle
#

So I'm fresh out of hs and I wanna learn the analyses right(as in proof based and what not) this summer, and landed on spivaks book, should I read a book on proofs like Vellman's first or can I jump right in?

marble grotto
#

maybe just start spivak and see if you can follow along

hearty steppe
#

What’s wrong with supplementary materials

marble solar
#

There's enough training wheels to get you going

hearty steppe
#

I think Spivak Calculus will come in handy for me when I get to the actual calculus parts of rudin. Haven't really fiddled around with Spivak yet besides a quick skim but I already learned elementary calculus up to and including multivar. Also a bit of Diff Eq

lime sapphire
#

anyone know what website can get me an affordable copy of spivak (i don't live in the US so international shipping is preferred)

marble grotto
#

i think there's one which has free international shipping

#

and the flat cost is free too

lime sapphire
#

do tell

gray gazelle
#

there's one that can get you a free pdf

nimble sable
#

Any recommendations for a book on geometric measure theory?

sage python
#

The standard is Federer's Geometric Measure Theory

ripe granite
#

🎾

sage python
#

Lol

#

But yeah that book is... very hard, it seems. I know @polar tulip is working through it I think.

#

I was given a free book once which seemed cool, I think by Morgan? And for the more pure/harmonic analysis/fractal side of GMT, there's Mattila

polar tulip
#

@nimble sable mattila is my rec

#

also nobody reads federer, it's a reference

#

as someone who briefly tried to actually read it, it sucks

#

0/10 would not recommend ever

hearty steppe
sage python
#

So I'm pretty sure this is a different Federer

#

In fact I learned about the mathematician looooong before the tennis player

tulip blade
halcyon hornet
#

Hello.
Can I get math book recommendations for math competitions(Math competitions which are up till and including 12th grade)?
Not AoPs as they are very costly.

analog lava
#

craft of pos

#

paul zeits

#

classic

halcyon hornet
analog lava
#

art and craft of problem solving by paul zeits

halcyon hornet
#

Okay that.

#

But that is like different.

hearty steppe
gray gazelle
# halcyon hornet But that is like different.

Zeitz's text is really good for getting into the nitty gritty of problem solving. Also, Polya and Tao are excellent too. But you wanna get some background first and aops is ideal for that.

halcyon hornet
#

Which one from him?

#

Terence Tao.

gray gazelle
#

solving mathematical problems

halcyon hornet
#

"But you wanna get some background first and aops is ideal for that."
Yeah exactly.

#

That is what I want.

#

But again AoPs is very costly.

karmic thorn
#

Try the Mathematical Olympiads book series by World Scientific?

#

There are methods to acquire their digital copies for a trial stare Buy only if they seem nice.

halcyon hornet
karmic thorn
halcyon hornet
#

Wait.

#

But for those I need some good math background first. A good math background for mathematical olympiads.

karmic thorn
#

This is the one I had in mind

#

16 volumes wew

#

@gray gazelle You asked about a book which talked about problems concerning sequences/series before, right? Volume 16 of the above series seems to address that.

worldly basalt
sonic vessel
#

hello, Can I get a math book recommendation for introduction combinatorics?

gray gazelle
#

Math book recommendation for introduction combinatorics!

#

Check out Khan Academy! ^.^

sonic vessel
#

Khan Academy is not a book

#

it is life style

gray gazelle
#

I printed out khan academy

sonic vessel
#

You can't print an academy

glossy grove
#

he can

coral narwhal
#

in spain they call him el god

gray gazelle
#

in france they call me le cat

sour briar
#

How feasible is it to jump into Dummit and Foote when learning abstract algebra for the first time? Should I read something like Pinter instead?

gray gazelle
#

its very beginner friendly

#

d&f is a first algebra book

gusty smelt
#

dummit and foote is the worst algebra book

#

do not read it

#

read like artin

gray gazelle
#

stfu pls

#

it spells everything out in extremely painful detail

#

which may be good or bad depending on you

gusty smelt
#

D&F is super dry and unfocused

#

seriously use like artin or jacobson for 1st yr algebra

gray gazelle
#

stfu plsss

#

d&f bae

gusty smelt
#

ppl who like dnf have something wrong with them catThink

gray gazelle
#

Wow that was rude.

gusty smelt
#

anyhow in all seriousness

#

pretty good explanation of the 1st year books

sour briar
#

ah

#

oh, so artin is beginner-friendly too

gusty smelt
#

mhm and it explores a lot of applications

#

probably the main complain is that their matrix stuff is a bit disgusting

timber mesa
#

then again you don't exactly read a book on AA for the matrix stuff

#

most of the time you'll already have done a course in LA

tulip blade
#

Plenty of people think Rudin is overly terse it isnt a new thing. Also nothing is wrong with wanting books to be self contained and not needing multiple sources just to get through it.

#

I've consulted multiple sources when reading a book it isnt bad but I prefer to just stick to one book and maybe some lecture notes unless another book covers something that the current book doesnt.

gray gazelle
#

Hello guys, what math books would you recommend to a CS major on his first year?

obsidian valley
#

cracking the coding interview

#

dont bother with math

#

its lame

#

:)

hearty steppe
# tulip blade why are you asking how many math books I've read? Also, yea reading multiple boo...

There are things in Rudin explained in ways you will hardly find in other books. Let alone the explanations that are as densely packed as they seem are supposed to motivate the critical thinking about the abstraction of the theorems and examples provided. It is very hard to find a book this consistent. Yes it’s hard to understand but I haven’t been struggling with it to the point it’s unreadable. The struggle with getting through it is consistent with your level of maturity in understanding math rigor mostly.

But perhaps some people have other preferences over analysis books. But Rudin also provides the standard of order in which you learn the content too.

You could try Apostol if you really don’t like Rudin that much. I like Apostol too

#

There are also some really good companion notes online for Rudin so that does add some leverage as well as many academic and online peers that are consistently going thru it. Not to mention there are more academic peers that spent years trying to break down Rudin for their students and uploading notes online

gray gazelle
#

@obsidian valley I like the math part of it

obsidian valley
#

lol lame

#

read the uh

#

CLRS

#

maybe

#

thats a nice DSA book

#

you can also do some theory of comp stuff but I don't know a good book thats approachable for a first year

#

i mean you can also just do some of the math you're going to need to do in first year

#

linear algebra first probably

gray gazelle
#

Yeah I thought about that

#

Is axler's book good on that subject

obsidian valley
#

I think most people think Axler is good

gray gazelle
#

What about elementary number theory?

obsidian valley
#

any discrete math book is sufficient for first year cs

hearty steppe
#

It’s probably better to study CS in grad school tbh

obsidian valley
#

yes

hearty steppe
#

If you are interested in actual CS that is. I find undergrad programs disappointing for it

#

Cuz it really depends on what you want to do. Do you want to study the intricacies of computer systems or do you want to study computability. You won’t learn much intuition for computability in an undergrad program.

#

Most of your courses are geared toward understanding the motivation behind how computer systems work. Not necessarily the cool aspects of computation with algorithms

tulip blade
tulip blade
hearty steppe
sudden kindle
#

You have something wrong with you

worldly cove
#

hehe Im taking it right now the first day was yesterday and ive already learned so much

#

mostly from the asking questions about the Alcumulus and homework

#

the class itself wasnt too hard

#

for some reason they make the homework 15x harder than the problems we do in class

rough hawk
#

LOL same

#

Right now I'm taking intermediate number theory and the homework is so hard

iron lake
quick hornet
#

You might not need math for programming, but you certainly need it for CS.

iron lake
#

facepalm i misread it as CSS

#

my b

willow pecan
broken meadow
#

:brush:

sudden kindle
#

good meme

sinful pewter
pale scarab
#

Do I need to learn functional analysis before learning fractional calculus? I have done basic undergrad analysis/topology but have not learned functional analysis. Any recommendations at my level or what I need to learn before getting into it?

slim peak
#

You need to take a look on Spectral, and Operator Theory on Banach spaces first

#

Then looking more specifically on sectorial operators and their fractional powers

#

using deep results of Functional Calculus and vector valued Complex Analysis (which is almost the same as usual Complex Analysis)

#

If you really want a path to learn about it :

  • A Guide to Spectral Theory, C.Cheverry & N.Raymond
  • Semigroup of Linear operators, A.Pazy
  • Interpolation Theory, A.Lunardi
sage python
#

Did someone say spectral theory

slim peak
#

the two last books contains both chapters about fractional powers

#

but with different point of view, almost complementary

slim peak
sage python
#

THis reminds me I need to finish up revising my proof of the Weyl law

past ice
#

So recently I got myself roped into an undergrad summer research thingy with a professor at my school and we're going to be working thru Alon and Spencer's book on the probabilistic method. I've completed a year-long graduate measure theory/real analysis sequence but know zero probability theory. I've expressed my concerns to prof but he says I should be fine picking stuff up as I go along. That said, does anyone know of a good probability text? I'm looking at the one by Cinlar but I'd like to hear more recommendations first.

past ice
#

All 3 of those resources you listed look amazing for my purposes. thank you!

sage python
#

When you say probabilistic method

#

In my mind that says combinatorics

#

Is that what you mean?

#

Stuff like e.g. proving existence of a graph with a property by showing P(random graph has that property) ≠ 0, etc

past ice
#

yeah that's basically the sales pitch I have in mind going in

sage python
#

Yeah in that case you might not need heavy probability. A full book is excessive for sure. Lawler's notes is prob the best of the 3

#

In my undergrad wombo combo class we mostly just used linearity of expectation lol

past ice
#

oh yeah going by what my advisor said I don't expect to need to read a whole prob book cover to cover. but i think having a comprehensive text is still nice for psychological purposes, and I kind of want to use the project as an excuse to kickstart further studies in probability and analysis (i mostly pigeonholed myself as an algebra person way too early). but in any case, thanks for the remark on Lawler. Probably going to make that my main read for the next week or so.

however, i expect that no amount of consoling or preparation is going to make the exercises in alon/spencer any less intimidating lol. i've heard some stories...

sage python
#

I'm intrigued

past ice
#

basically the book is known for its lack of approachable exercises. The authors, who are two of the most recognizable names in the field, seem to not have time to contrive exercises of reasonable difficulty so they end up throwing in results that they themselves proved not too long ago. It's kind of terrifying

gusty smelt
#

alon and spencer exercises are insane

#

i had a class around the book

#

and literally every single pset was optional

past ice
#

prof was like "if we work thoroughly on some exercise we might get a paper by the end of summer" lolol

gusty smelt
#

one of these days im just gonna like

#

take 2 months out

#

and do all the problems

past ice
#

if you manage that in 2 months i will basically revere you as a god

gusty smelt
#

yeah might be impossible lol

#

basically like just do alon and spencer all day catThink

past ice
#

well, you're free to join me this summer 🙂

gusty smelt
#

oh yeah sure

#

i think i never got beyond erm

#

ch 1 ex 3

#

spent like a week on it

#

👀

past ice
#

I think I'm gonna start reading the book next week. this week i shore up on some prob/graph theory

gusty smelt
#

nice

past ice
scenic geyser
#

no

gray gazelle
slow matrix
#

actually I'm starting to like Rudin (PMA), am I weird?

willow pecan
slow matrix
#

I thought it's cool thing to like Rudin.

spring cedar
#

Uh hello

#

Purcell's calculus is pog

#

Oh

#

Walpole's statistics too

hearty steppe
slow matrix
#

I have a local study group that I sometimes use for my presentation to teach myself.

#

I haven't finished reading it, and I already could decently do entry test for math grad school in my place. So I guess it's not too bad I guess.

slow matrix
obsidian valley
narrow echo
#

oops

obsidian valley
#

this is ur fault

tulip blade
quick hornet
#

uhhh

#

this isnt the place to advertise your stuff

gray gazelle
slate topaz
#

Hello, I wanna teach myself trignometry. Can someone recommend me a book that's available free online

hearty steppe
#

Paul’s online notes

winter veldt
#

also didnt u ask this in multiple channels

wicked nymph
#

replied too soon right

sudden kindle
#

I like KA

languid orchid
gray gazelle
#

Can anyone suggest book for discrete mathematics?

gray gazelle
#

check out concrete math

#

by knuth

gray gazelle
#

Okay

brittle latch
#

pirate bay B)

gray gazelle
#

.

signal bone
#

heya

#

im hovering on this book

#

the start look very good

#

i recommend you to check it up

gray gazelle
#

ok, but what's the point of doing linear algebra now

signal bone
#

why not

gray gazelle
#

not covered in highschool

signal bone
#

the book you gave not covered in highschool either

gray gazelle
#

afaik, not rly

#

it's just honors' treatment

signal bone
#

honors treatment?

gray gazelle
hasty turret
#

LA is just generally useful

gray gazelle
gray gazelle
signal bone
#

listen

#

there is not a single reason, to a student that really want to learn, to read a book from 150 years ago

#

that doesnt make sense

gray gazelle
signal bone
#

if you are a researcher and you want to study the time - ok i guess

#

but this book looks extremly outdated

gray gazelle
#

i asked you to find me an alternative

signal bone
#

@gray gazelle can you look at the book?

#

this one right?

gray gazelle
#

Algebra: An Elementary Text-Book - For the Higher classes of Secondary Schools and Colleges Volumes 1 & 2 by Chrystal
Higher Algebra: a Sequel to Elementary Algebra for Schools by Hall and Knight
College Algebra (AMS Chelsea Publishing) by Henry Burchard Fine
2nd has shitty formatting
3rd can only be found in djvu, online converters have a tendency to fuck up djvus converted to pdfs

#

and djvu is a shitty format generally

#

not going to read this shit

#

Well I know some modern books on this

#

I did Hornsby, Lial and Rockswold

#

The book is called "A Graphical approach to algebra and trigonometry"

gray gazelle
signal bone
gray gazelle
#

I have a fetish for old texts

gray gazelle
signal bone
#

i have an headache just reading the font

signal bone
gray gazelle
gray gazelle
signal bone
#

what shreks?

#

and rainbows lmao

gray gazelle
#

rainbows because of all the colors
shreks because I heard Stewart's Calculus has a Shrek in it

signal bone
#

i prefer a cleaner font and not a font that was meant to be printed by some inked machine in the laste 17th century

gray gazelle
#

oh I see

#

I don't find these sorts of books good tbh

#

i've read through most of it, but i skipped some stuff at the end because i got pissed off by how he presented a new concept in 1.5p while wasting previous 20p reiterating the same boring bullshit

gray gazelle
#

I mean, you have to filter a lot of stuff

#

There is just lots of unnecessary and mundane things in it

#

if you mean the exercises, isn't it normal to just skip some

#

for example Axler's Precalculus had 'Exercises' and 'Problems', and every 2nd exercise was solved, so what I did was to check out every question, see if I have an idea how to answer it but not actually write it, and check out the solution

#

if I didn't know how to, I would attempt to solve it on paper

#

Is Axler's text good?

#

i found it to be very good till the end of trig

gray gazelle
#

I plan to come back to it once I finish Chrystal's text or some alternative

#

I must say, I find Chrystal's text very intriguing by glancing at it

gray gazelle
#

some famous mathematicians have recommended it

#

so it's somewhat famous

#

where did you get to know about it?

gray gazelle
signal bone
quick hornet
#

is there really a meaningful difference between texts at the high school level

#

like obviously some will be better and some will be worse but i feel like

#

a motivated student will pass and an unmotivated one wont

#

and the textbook wont really affect that

gray gazelle
quick hornet
#

sure but i feel like the main purpose of high school courses is to develop basic fluency rather than to teach content

#

if that makes sense

#

like a high school treatment of complex numbers, polar form, etc. often takes multiple weeks

#

a mathematically mature uni student learns it in half an hour

#

so im unconvinced that jamming in as much content at a high school level is the right thing to do

#

feel like its better to focus on reinforcing foundational skills so that its easier for them to pick that content up quickly when they actually need it

#

that said, im not a pedagogy expert so im probably talking out my ass here

#

well, drop the "probably"

gray gazelle
#

i think he argued against me using Chrystal's Algebra despite it's comprehensiveness and it's universal acclaim, due to the notation being dated

#

to which I retorted by saying that I may learn the modern notation later, and what matters is the clear explanation of the concepts and their relation

whole rain
#

I agree with Namington here

sudden kindle
#

I agree with Shika here

deep prism
#

I agree with putin sushi here

crimson slate
#

Hey y'all I was looking for a book on the basics of Discrete Mathematics, any recommendations are appreciated.
P.s. I'm looking to gain some insight as a CS student, so a very rigorous book might be an overkill, or I'm just confused atm.

velvet briar
#

Google for Oscar Levin Discrete pdf. It's a very easy book and will get you understanding logical statements, sets, ect. @crimson slate

crimson slate
#

Thanks @velvet briar it seem to be a nice start

oak umbra
#

Hey guys, so I'm starting my masters in applied mathematics and plan to be doing it on mathematical epidemiology, specifically using random forests coupled with Markov chains (as that is what my supervisor is interested in). I myself have never touched Markov chains, i was trained more in time series and statistical inference. So I was wondering if there are any texts you guys could recommend for someone at the graduate level with a relatively gentle introduction to Markov chains and their applications. There are so many books its hard to know what best fits my purpose. Thanks

golden veldt
#

Looking for books to prepare for a graduate analysis class. Previous books for the course were Lang, Folland, Bass, and Billingsey. I finished going through Spivak and want to prepare over the next year.

hearty steppe
#

I would advise even if you did undergrad analysis just go through baby rudin so your that much better at math

gray gazelle
#

how do yall read baby rudin? i never read it all, i always tried to prove theorems by my own before reading proof but i was too dumb to do all book

hearty steppe
#

There’s a certain way to take notes from math books that I’m starting to understand and it seems to benefit most with standard books I think. Or books that make you really think about the rigor

#

Some books seem hand holdy and don’t really prompt you to take note of anything or think more about what’s going on

gray gazelle
#

@hearty steppe can you describe how?

hearty steppe
#

Like I think comparing Rudin to Abbott is a great example. Abbott is a good book but it feels like it doesn’t really probe you to think as much about the abstraction of the rigor involved in how Rudin goes about it

#

Or comparing Janich’s Linear Algebra to Friedberg’s elementary linear algebra and it’s applications

gray gazelle
#

Begone bot

#

@sage python can you deal with this please

#

what a fucking --------

hasty turret
#

No,He just skips everything

#

"ok this claim is obviously true. I leave it to the reader to prove it"

#

The claim turns out to be very nontrivial

#

And you try to look for the solution on the internet and don't find anything

hearty steppe
#

I find it to be? I like it tho

sage python
#

Oh you're saying catman is a bot?

#

Lmfao

#

Oh

#

I thought you were saying catman was a bot that talks about Rudin and Abbott whenever either comes up

storm sleet
#

Is there any reason for the Aluffi hate here? Like, if someone already has a reasonable grasp of algebra, is it still a bad book to learn basic cat thoery

hearty steppe
#

Bloop bloop beep

But idk I like Rudin. It just feels like it begs me to interact with it a lot to understand it and stuff

sage python
#

deathcode the problem people have with Aluffi is more like

#

The exercises are quite bad

#

It's wayyyyyyyyy too slow

#

And I've heard from some who used it that it doesn't do a great job at making it clear which parts are categorical/just words and which parts are actual algebraic content

#

Yeah you need to ask people with the correct perspectives

storm sleet
#

Is there a better alternative for like, motivated category theory? I was looking at Topology a categorical approach, but I just need something to get me into cat theory, under the assumption that I have a reasonable grasp of like, 1st year graduate algebra (second exposure to group theory, some commutative algebra, galois theory)

sage python
#

Algebraic topology

storm sleet
#

I do know point set, but our course only went up to topological groups in Armstrong. He said Munkres was "too advanced" for the course

sage python
#

The thing about algebraic topology is that that's where you start jumping back and forth between different things

gray gazelle
#

sus king daminark

storm sleet
#

Oh christ I don't want to ever deal with lenses again @sweet lotus. I am a programmer and have done a fair bit with Haskell, theorem proving and PL theory in general

sage python
#

Like if you're strictly within algebra then the functoriality of the functors you're dealing with doesn't feel like it's a big thing

#

At least at the beginning

#

But in algebraic topology the fact that homotopy and (co)homology are functors is, while not hard to prove, a substantial "statement"

#

Like alright these are good ways of jumping around between different settings

storm sleet
#

I want to learn bc I feel like I'm getting to the point where not having cat theory knowledge will actively hinder me. I'm starting to get into AG and wanting to learn some AT, but I'm less confident in my topology than I am my algebra

sage python
#

Yeah a number of AT/AG books introduce what they need as they go

#

You don't need a dedicated intro

storm sleet
#

As an aside on the AG, we're using the Hulek book, so idk if it goes into much

sage python
#

I do not know Hulek

storm sleet
#

My main struggle is proofs and diagram chasing, at least as far as I can tell

#

Any time I've tried a book (god forbid the time I tried Mac Lane) the diagram chasing just wasn't followable

#

Thinking with arrows instead of sets is hard 😦

sage python
#

Was it the simple diagrams that messed you up? Like did you stumble when you saw a square?

storm sleet
#

Triangles and squares were fine, some limits were fine too, like basic ones like product/coproduct, equalizers and coequalizers

#

pullbacks and pushouts were not fun

#

And then there was that time Bartosz tried to introduce Yoneda embedding, and thats were I gave up

#

Haven't heard of it tbh

gray gazelle
storm sleet
#

our grad tolopogy sequence touches it at the end, but our undergrad topology goes fairly slow

#

😦

#

I gotta finish my CS degree too :/

#

No time

hasty turret
#

Is this a dual degree

storm sleet
#

Nope, I'm just double majoring

#

I powered through an entire math degree in only 1.5 years tho

#

From freshman vector calc to graduate diff geo and intro to AG

#

We have a dedicated AG sequence too, which uses Hatcher, but even that goes p slow afaik

#

*AT yes

#

The keys are right next to each other lol

sage python
#

Cohomology is but a prelude to sheaf cohomology

storm sleet
#

Undergrad topology covers metric spaces, some general topological spaces, up to compactness, connectedness (some path), topological groups (sometimes) and if you're lucky fundamental group. Grad sequence does all that, fundamental group, and I think some stuff with covering spaces and some other stuff, not 100% sure, and our AT sequence is hatcher

#

We also run on quarters not semesters here

#

yep yep

gray gazelle
storm sleet
#

Yeah... Just a matter of finding time

#

Self study is the only way I have time for

#

AT outline for our uni btw

sage python
#

Well if he's hoping for category stuff then maybe not. If you want an easy book read Rotman. Hard one read May

steel viper
#

van kampen is cute

hard lion
gray gazelle
#

Will Willard prepare for AT

steel viper
#

What is willard

gray gazelle
steel viper
#

you dont need much point set at all for AT

#

in what way?

gray gazelle
#

Is it fine enough to learn point set

gray gazelle
#

atomic habits >>>

broken meadow
#

i simply help others instead

gray gazelle
#

you've got me pegged pensivebread

steel viper
spring cedar
gray gazelle
#

What would be some good books to start learning complex analysis?

prisma snow
#

Gomez, stop trolling, you definitely know CA.

whole rain
#

I thought the exact same thing

prisma snow
#

😂

whole rain
prisma snow
#

^

gray gazelle
#

ooh thanks

#

Found some good books, thanks thumsup

quick hornet
#

what would be some good books to start learning calc 2?

gray gazelle
#

Second part of baby rudin

prisma snow
karmic thorn
#

Nami should fill in the pre-reqs first. Start with the bare basics.

shadow tusk
#

has anyone read Alex's Adventures In Numberland here?

#

if so how beginner friendly do you think it is?

#

a bit of a backstory I know like 0 calculus

atomic hound
#

HELLO Gays, so i am about to go to college ans a i wanna study the "DISCRETE MATH".what book could you recomended for a beginner?

quick hornet
#

"HELLO Gays" is somehow accidentally an accurate way to refer to this server's typical membership.

#

anyway, why are you learning discrete math? for programming/CS or for mathematics? or out of interest?

atomic hound
#

Or my god sorry man

#

Was misspelled the word

quick hornet
#

a lot of them seem more CS-oriented

#

but admittedly mathematics majors usually dont take a course called "discrete math" unless its their first intro to proofs

#

or required by their degree

#

they tend to cover the material in more depth in dedicated courses - "elementary number theory", "graph theory", "games", etc

#

discrete math is kind of a contrivance created for CS students.

atomic hound
#

More one thing, what about probrability for a beginner?

#

I like this stuff too

formal solstice
#

What might be a good resource for elementary number theory?

karmic thorn
#

The latest pinned message has several recommendations.

formal solstice
#

What's the difference between discrete mathematics and number theory?

#

or is a text in discrete mathematics a good intro before diving into elementary number theory

karmic thorn
#

Discrete mathematics is a loose umbrella term for topics like graph theory, some enumerative combinatorics, introduction to proofs, some elementary number theory, propositional logic(one or more of these things could be removed, or added, depending on course). This is basically supposed to be an entry point for CS students to learn some math that might come in handy for them. Number theory, on the other hand, is concerned exclusively with a dedicated study of "numbers", starting off in the familiar context of natural numbers/integers, gradually progressing into more general and abstract settings.

karmic thorn
formal solstice
#

I think eventually I'd love to dive into elementary number theory as a subject. I am a bit rusty on proofs at the moment, however.

karmic thorn
#

You could review some stuff from here. This is a very concise set of notes for that purpose.

formal solstice
#

@karmic thorn thanks. this PDF looks nice

karmic thorn
atomic hound
#

Which some good euclides geometry books?

hasty turret
#

Why do you want to do Euclidean Geometry

#

It's completely useless for any real life purpose

#

Except for olympiads

atomic hound
#

I dont care, i like and that it

#

and is useful for me

#

Ans my projects

#

i dont give a f**k if it is useful for other people or life in general.I just wanna be happy with this type of knowledge.

hasty turret
atomic hound
#

Lol it was mispelled error of my part

atomic hound
#

And 2d geometry as well too.

gray gazelle
#

Is discrète maths really that important

#

I was gonna go vellman then axler's liniar algebra

#

Is there a better choice for a CS major?

karmic thorn
karmic thorn
gray gazelle
#

Alright thanks

#

My needs are to have little background before starting college

karmic thorn
#

Sounds good!

gray gazelle
#

Thank you!

hasty turret
gray gazelle
#

@hasty turret can you elaborate

hasty turret
#

Can you solve basic logic problems

#

Try solving
"Suppose you have to climb up a stair with n steps. You could either take 1 step at a time or 2 steps at a time. Find the total number of possible paths you could take"

gray gazelle
#

I'm fresh out of hs

#

Oh

#

I can

hasty turret
#

Ok,it might be relevant

gray gazelle
#

That sounds like probability to me

hasty turret
#

Suppose n=3 your paths are
0->1->2->3
0->1->3
0->2->3

gray gazelle
#

If that makes sense

hasty turret
#

This is combinatorics

#

Combined with some recurrences

gray gazelle
#

And this falls under which branch of maths?

#

As in what book do I need to read to be able to do this?

hasty turret
#

Well, Combinatorics

mossy flume
#

Discrete can be important for a couple reasons

#

1 is if it's a CS oriented class, it can be a good introduction to the theory behind structures like trees and graphs

#

2 it can be an intro to proofs class for non-math majors (engineering and CS types mostly)

tame sluice
#

will anyone Recommend me some books or papers of Hyperbolic, Hilbert, Hausdroff spaces(for beginners)?

sudden kindle
#

Why these topics

willow pecan
#

They are completely unrelated...

sudden kindle
#

On the surface, they seem to have nothing to do with each other

gray gazelle
#

LOL

sudden kindle
#

Is there a reason you want to learn these thing besides the fact that they are terms for spaces which start with an H?

glossy grove
#

He wants to study spaces xD

tame sluice
#

yes, I want to study Space times, for in Black holes & near Singularities

glossy grove
#

A Hausdorff space is a topological space in which each two (different) points have disjoint neighbourhoods.

#

introduction finished

#

i don't know what the others are, so I can't help with those xD

gray gazelle
#

hillbert spaces are complete inner product spaces

tame sluice
#

I know that, I just want a Beginning start(papers?)

glossy grove
#

If you want to study Hausdorff spaces, read a book on general topology.

tame sluice
#

anything in Hyperbolic & Negative Curvatures?

gray gazelle
#

maybe read a book on elementary differential geometry

#

idk

gray gazelle
sage python
#

Did someone say Hilbert space

narrow echo
gray gazelle
#

What should I read then after axler's? @narrow echo

tulip blade
#

Whatever youre interested in

#

@gray gazelle

#

You should read things online and try to find something interesting.

gray gazelle
#

Well I'm doing CS major what do I need to know

tulip blade
#

You dont need axler for a cs major

gray gazelle
#

Isn't there a lot of linear algebra in CS

willow pecan
#

Depends on the type

#

But linear algebra is widely applicable

tulip blade
#

Axler will be most abstract then you would likely need. But I think its still worth it to learn

#

Bc you could very well need it if you wanted to do cs research.

willow pecan
#

However, the linear algebra you'll see in CS is less abstract vector space linear algebra and more computational matrix algorithm linear algebra

#

For this, I recommend Demmel

narrow echo
#

"Linear Algebra Done Right for Math Majors"

tulip blade
gray gazelle
#

@tulip blade yeah it's summer and I get bored and did math in my free time

#

Now I have 3 months of free time

tulip blade
#

Then try to learn stuff youre interested in imo

gray gazelle
#

Might as well be ahead

tulip blade
#

It will still help when you take your classes. You have time to learn this stuff when youre in the class.

gray gazelle
#

But isn't undergradad math hand wavey for CS majors?

#

I wanna know Why something is the way it is

#

Or am I wrong

tulip blade
#

Depends it can be I guess.

#

I just said learn something youre interested in. If its linear algebra then learn it. It will be useful.

gray gazelle
#

I'm interested in number theory tbh

#

But I need some linear algebra for that

static crest
#

undergrad math is handwavey for all undergrad majors other than math

sage python
#

Linear algebra isn't really a subject that I would say is hand waved

#

That's more what I think of physicists and analysis lol

#

It's more black boxed

#

Since it's not like they give you a wishy washy intuition. Maybe Cayley-Hamilton has a fake proof lol. But otherwise they either tell you why it's true or just say it's true. Which is more honest

broken meadow
#

the fake proof for cayley hamilton is to just substitute it in

#

the one i saw was to form a cyclic subspace and form the char poly from there

#

which then follows nice

gusty smelt
#

I like the "diagonalizables are dense in R^(nxn)" proof

slim peak
#

quite handy for Physicists and Analysts

broken meadow
#

ooh how does that start

slim peak
broken meadow
#

cool ill try it out

#

i still need to get around to doing dami's question from earlier but aaah things have been rough

#

need to get ahold of myself

slim peak
#

note that one can use such kind of formulas to give a good (and very deep) meaning to f(A), f being a suitable function, holomorphic, A a densely defined closed operator on a Banach space (but this may need additional assumptions : like spectral ones, the Banach space to be a Hilbert, etc... )

sage python
#

Oh yeah I meant the bs bs proof lol

#

If p_A(t) = det(tI-A), then p_A(A) = det(AI-A) = det(0) = 0

gray gazelle
#

whats wrong with this proof?

willow pecan
#

Nothing it's a correct proof

ripe granite
#

Yup, it's correct.

broken meadow
#

yes.

sage python
#

Okay I think everyone's in on the joke but I feel like there's a non-trivial possibility someone's actually bamboozled

gray gazelle
willow pecan
#

TTerra do you know lie groups

gray gazelle
#

no

willow pecan
slim peak
#

@gray gazelle to answer to your request in #groups-rings-fields , you should check this one, that you can expect to find on usual websites catThink

gray gazelle
#

the usual websites

willow pecan
#

Anatole do you know lie groups

slim peak
#

Just the basics and nothing about Iwasawa decomposition, just already heard of it at most

#

sorry bruh

gray gazelle
#

ask daminark

sudden kindle
#

Okay bro

#

I just spend a couple hours

#

trying to explain the proof that

#

a polynomial is solvable by radicals iff the galois group of its splitting field is solvabel

#

i have a pretty good contextualization of where Kummer extensions fit into Galois theory now

slim peak
#

that's not the channel to discuss about it right ?

sudden kindle
#

my bad

slim peak
#

No problem haha

gray gazelle
#

coomer extensions

sudden kindle
#

haha funny joke

whole rain
sage python
#

Hah the story of me with it is funny

narrow crystal
#

Is Stewarts calculus good for someone who isn't too familiar with trig? I have tried reading the calculus book Quick Calculus but I couldn't understand it.

storm harness
#

I think one issue might be that the determinant would have different values for computations done by expansion along different rows since the matrix ring is non commutative but once you choose one of them as the definition it should work out

#

Since the determinant for over the matrix ring is only being used in the intermediate steps

#

Ah the det(AI-A) = det(0) step won't be justified then

tame sluice
analog pollen
#

It has a full appendix on trig

#

Also it introduces trig quite a bit in chapter 1 as well as the chapter where derivatives are handled

barren raptor
#

Hey any recommendations for good book that takes from beginner to advance on algebra

flint forge
#

When someone says higher and algebra in #books-old 👀

#

@barren raptor we normally just suggest khan academy

barren raptor
#

I was looking for a good to start

#

Khan academy is okay but still .

hearty steppe
#

Khan academy is good for learning up to elementary level calculus and linear algebra. That’s really about it

#

It’s not going to get you through an entire undergrad math program

flint forge
#

I dont think theres any reason to believe they wanted undergrad material

marble solar
#

well, They don't have a linear algebra module

#

They only have lecture videos

#

But they do have a calc 3 module

storm sleet
#

Though there are people who are just as good that are great post-khan academy math channels

#

Michael Penn, Brighter Side of Mathematics, Richard Borcherds, and a few others come to mind

#

(just be sure to exercise caution when/if you discover Insights into Mathematics)

#

Fun fact: if you google NJ Wildberger, one of the top results is "NJ Wildberger crank"

gray gazelle
#

Khan academy is bad

#

Gn Berman is awesome for calculus
Russian book

analog pollen
slim peak
gray gazelle
analog pollen
#

Not for learning a subject

#

As far for calculus then

#

Algebra idk how good it is

analog pollen
#

But that doesn’t mean it’s bad

gray gazelle
#

Yes, solving wise it is good.

analog pollen
#

So it’s probably good good for elementary algebra

#

Cuz there isn’t a lot of theory

gray gazelle
#

But it came too back when youtube didnt have much maths tutoring videod

#

Now I think it's average comparing others.

narrow crystal
analog pollen
#

I haven’t finished it yet

#

It has calc 1 to 3

#

1400 pages

narrow crystal
#

Oh, how much is necessary for physics

narrow crystal
analog pollen
narrow crystal
#

Oof, I want to pass the F=ma exam for phys oly and I need to learn calc for it.

analog pollen
#

It’s just a basic calc textbook

#

Are you planning on buying the book?

narrow crystal
#

Yea

analog pollen
#

Don’t then

#

If you are only gonna buy it for a exam

#

If you are planning on studying calc I would say buy it

#

Otherwise don’t

narrow crystal
#

I mean I haven't taken calc yet and it might help me in my calc class when I take it so idk

analog pollen
#

For a physics exam there are plenty of other recourses out there then buying a 300 $ book

narrow crystal
#

Is Khan academy fine for f=ma?

analog pollen
#

I think so

#

Maybe you want to ask this in a physics discord or ssomthing

narrow crystal
#

Im learning limits on Khan academy and so far it doesn't seem too hard.

analog pollen
#

But if you are looking for a calc textbook without a lot of prerequisites then I would say Stewart’s is one of the best

#

As it’s easy to read and covers enough

narrow crystal
#

I see, I think for the phys only I will just use Khan academy and in the future for a moreh in depth understanding of calc I will get Stewarts.

analog pollen
#

For physics I would say you want a more in depth understanding of calc

#

Imo

gray gazelle
#

whats the best textbook for practice questions for calc I and II?

#

that i can buy on amazon

slender spruce
#

Schaum's Outlines "Calculus" has a bunch of problems with answers.

#

@gray gazelle Looks like there's also Schaum's Outlines "3,000 Solved Problems in Calculus"

gray gazelle
#

thanks @slender spruce

slender spruce
#

Apparently, you shouldn't buy the Kindle version of the last.

#

They made the mistake of not including any inequality signs.

crystal lion
#

maybe don’t make the mistake of buying the kindle version of any math textbook lol

#

actually it doesn’t seem so bad

#

but still I’d prefer my computer if I don’t have the paper copy

cursive orbit
#

Would bott-tu be a good book for me to learn algebraic topology if I have completed tu's intro to manifolds book and have rudimentary knowledge of point-set topology but no previous algebraic topology knowledge?

cursive orbit
#

sadge any recommendations then?

marble solar
#

Hatcher algebraic topology

cursive orbit
#

Thank you

warm glen
#

what is bott-tu good for then

marble solar
#

Making you read hatcher

sage python
#

Okay so

#

Bott-Tu kinda does different things from Hatcher

#

Hatcher's a more standard intro to algebraic topology. pi_1, covering spaces, homology, cohomology, pi_n

#

Bott-Tu focuses on stuff like De Rham theory, spectral sequences, char classes, etc

gray gazelle
#

another book i can say ill read but never do so

gray gazelle
#

Can someone suggest a good and difficult book for single variable calculus I am learning it for the first time....I have heard a lot about spivak's calculus

cursive orbit
#

Or is there no point reading both

analog pollen
#

For the first time I would recommend Stewart’s calculus

#

Or any book with the same kind of format

wraith ravine
devout raptor
#

Does anyone have some Sat suggestions

quick hornet
#

khan academy.

devout raptor
#

Description?

quick hornet
#

its a free website so just check it out yourself

#

has a bunch of videos and basic problems on every high school math topic

#

not really a book but still probably the best free resource for high school

devout raptor
#

Thank you 😊

quick hornet
#

you could also check out the openstax free textbooks on algebra + trig but idk how closely they follow the sat curriculum

#

i think they cover some stuff that isnt on the sat

#

and go deeper into certain stuff than the sat does

devout raptor
#

Again thanks

past ice
hearty steppe
#

American educational culture is its own plague

north valley
#

Sometimes I wonder if I would have been more engaged in theoretical math if my first few semesters had been spent on Spivaj rather than Stewart 😩

sage python
#

Yeah Spivak is tougher than Stewart but it's an alternative rather than a "second take"

#

If you've already done Stewart better thing is to use linear algebra as an intro to proofs and then go to Rudin or smth

gray gazelle
#

Spivaj

#

Spivka

sage python
#

Uh TTerra, why are you misspelling Spivak?

#

Is this a pun I'm not picking up on?

gray gazelle
#

(edited)

obsidian valley
broken meadow
#

what

gray gazelle
#

what

broken meadow
#

theres an lgbt shark

#

at ikea

#

i had to read that twice to make sure i read that right

gray gazelle
#

yeah some dude named spivaj who is gay and has a shark fursona is at ikea

broken meadow
#

it's you

gray gazelle
#

i would never be a shark

broken meadow
#

ah i see

#

very good

obsidian valley
#

you guys dont know the trans shark thing

#

sec

gray gazelle
#

Yes

broken meadow
#

yes

stuck onyx
#

Which edition of How to Prove It by Daniel J. Velleman is best?

gray gazelle
#

presumably the newest one

#

Yo

glossy grove
#

oy

gray gazelle
#

What math do you need for the eulers project

#

I got the coding down

#

But I'm afraid it will hit me with something I don't know

stuck onyx
glossy grove
#

I don't think you need that much maths.

gray gazelle
#

No

#

The website

#

@stuck onyx latest version probablly

#

@stuck onyx also his prénom was évariste

#

His name was galois

#

The French are weird like that

glossy grove
#

As I said, you need mostly coding, not maths.

sage python
#

Well I think you kinda want some math?

#

My impression about project euler problems is that you can in principle code them a stupid way

#

But the point is that the code runs in just a minute

glossy grove
sage python
#

And chances are knowing math or at least being able to figure out math is important to find the right simplifications

#

It won't be technical math but in general being able to feel your way around discrete math is probably what helps

gray gazelle
#

Aight I'll add knutths book on discrete math to my to read list

sage kelp
warm socket
#

you shouldn't really judge the prerequisites from the first problems, also there are some problems where you really really need some maths theorems

#

but they are the minority

crystal lion
#

they’re not very algorithmic

quick hornet
#

using problem 1 to demonstrate the point is very weird

#

id liken project euler more to competition math than anything

#

the technical knowledge required isnt immense but solutions still require a fair bit of mathematical cleverness

#

problem 1 is unnaturally easy, because its problem 1

cursive orbit
#

Can someone give a comparison between Folland and Big Rudin for self-studying real analysis?

#

My analysis background is roughly on the level of first 7 chapters of baby rudin + analysis on R^n + basic measure theory

primal island
#

any differential equation textbook recommendations? (for self studying)

willow pecan
#

ODEs or PDEs

karmic thorn
#

anticipated 'all ODE books are bad' remark

#

I think Ross' Differential Equations is a good mix of light theory and the techniques. Has lots of problems and some examples to highlight them.

willow pecan
#

All ODE books are bad

#

ODEs is kind of a bad subject, especially at the undergraduate level

broken meadow
#

Never again.

#

i don't want to do it

willow pecan
#

If you get more advanced there are some more things you can do with them

#

But they generally aren't called ODEs

slim peak
#

True af, the only good ones I know are to almost graduate people

cursive orbit
#

Are the undergrad level courses prerequisites to the grad level ones?

willow pecan
#

Theoretically

#

Practically, probably not

#

All of undergrad ODE is solved by mathematica~~

slim peak
#

For computational techniques, and some basic theoritic results (for those who have theoritic results in their notes catThin4K )

cursive orbit
#

I see

slim peak
#

quite "difficult" for undergraduate but appropriate

#

very theoritical

#

is what I mean by "difficult"

#

but it contains examples

#

links with differential equations from casual Physics

broken meadow
#

o

cursive orbit
#

thonkid I see

opaque needle
#

good books in linear algebra? Looking to really understand the matrices I use in opengl

broken meadow
#

friedberg insel spence

opaque needle
#

appreciate it

stark creek
#

anyone selling algebra by artin in europe

obsidian valley
#

you can get it on Springer

stark creek
#

yeah but no hardcover

languid oyster
#

I know it's not a recent book, and I know this isn't really a "recommendation", but has anyone else noticed a mistake in "The Manga Guide to Linear Algebra", on page 56, when explaining combinations?

gray gazelle
#

i don't think many people here have read the book, and that's an awfully specific thing about it, so if you want good feedback you should include an image

hearty steppe
#

oh the manga guides are not necessarily designed for people who are serious about mathematics

#

its really really surface level computations generally

#

that are applied level

languid oyster
#

I couldn't find anyone talking about it, so I thought it might have been me misinterpreting...

languid oyster
#

They still can't make mistakes just because it's not a super serious read.

hearty steppe
#

they are but like... its not something you would read if you wanted to do theoretical math stuff or you want to do grad level stuff in mathematics

languid oyster
#

Sure, I only rely on them for conceptual understanding.

hearty steppe
#

most of the manga guides are designed for like general STEM students that like anime and manga

languid oyster
#

I never read any manga in my life outside of them and still found them good.

#

But yes.

gray gazelle
hearty steppe
#

i mean it will get you through like very intro level calculus and stats/probability classes for sure and stuff like that

languid oyster
#

They give a conceptual understanding, but for actual calculations they are not ideal.

quick hornet
#

what's the mistake?

hearty steppe
#

idk how far in math you want to go lol

gray gazelle
#

i'm not sure how this conversation went from "there's an error in page 69 of this book" to "this book isn't suitable for learning mathematics deeply"

quick hornet
#

i feel like this hasnt been answered yet

gray gazelle
#

i know

#

i wanted to write the sex number

quick hornet
#

haha tterra owned

languid oyster
#

Fine, I'll post a picture

gray gazelle
languid oyster
#

Hope I don't get sued.

#

For copyright XD

karmic thorn
#

You actually read them all

languid oyster
#

32 and 33

gray gazelle
#

why would you do this

karmic thorn
#

I would skip this page without blinking

languid oyster
#

The pages afterwards still based themselves off having 35 patterns.

gray gazelle
#

ok, then it's definitely an error (the fact that they are the same, that is)

quick hornet
#

35 is the correct count, its 7 choose 3

#

idk where they messed up

#

probably missed a combination somewhere

#

alongside the double counting

languid oyster
#

Yeah, that's what I was thinking

#

But I can't spot it

gray gazelle
#

why would you

languid oyster
#

OK, what matters is there's 35 patterns

gusty smelt
#

repeat this exercise but for 100 instead of 7

#

list em all out

languid oyster
#

The subgroups should decrease uniformly though.

quick hornet
#

DEF

#

lmao

#

they wrote DEG instead of DEF

languid oyster
quick hornet
#

idk what you mean by subgroups

#

but all the counts are correct except for DEG instead of DEF.

languid oyster
#

Gosh, I read the F further down, and I was reminded order doesn't matter

#

That's why I was confused.

#

They should have had DEF for pattern 33

quick hornet
#

yes.

#

not that the numbering really matters, but regardless

languid oyster
#

Unless you want to know which line you are talking about XD

molten agate
#

I'll make it quick. for calculus: stewart, larson, thomas or salas/hille? and why?

broken meadow
#

idk about larson or salas/hille but

#

stewart and thomas seem to be well written, but out of the two i have more experience with stewart and it does an okay job. The best part of stewart has to be the challenge problems at the end of every chapter, i recommend to do as many of them as possible

#

they are called Problems Plus in the stewart books but perhaps the thomas books have a similar problem sets

lofty sluice
#

Is there any book that treats euclidean geometry in modern axiomatic way

#

As far as I know, Euclids Element isnt "complete" or "fullproof" axiomatically speaking

#

Is there amy modern axiomatic systems that takes linear algebra and group theory to develop the euclidean geometry axiomatically?

willow pecan
#

Hilbert, Tarski, and Birkhoff have each proposed different sets of axioms to develop Euclidean geometry axiomatically

#

You can probably find a translation of Hilbert's Grundlagen der Geometrie online

lofty sluice
#

And wht abt the others?

willow pecan
#

Tarski's axioms appear to have been exposited at a symposium so finding those proceedings might be a bit difficult

lofty sluice
#

I see..Thanks for the heads up

#

BTW,are they all synthetically developed or analytically?

willow pecan
#
#

This is Birkhoff's thing

lofty sluice
#

Thanks mate

quick hornet
#

theyre synthetic

#

analytic geometry encodes arithmetic so is incomplete

#

but tarski axioms are complete + consistent

#

& i think the others are as well

past ice
pale scarab
#

What's a good history of math book? I read a journey through genius by dunham over the weekend and really enjoyed it but want something a little more in depth.

cursive orbit