#book-recommendations
1 messages · Page 201 of 1
Where are you taking this topology class?
Hmm I could get that
Why do you take algebraic anything at NYU
Using Hatcher as a book?
its just been 5 weeks of point set
or 2 weeks of motivation and 3 of point set
Oh dang
NYU people barely know what groups are
yea idk cuz he reached out to me
i think columbia would fucking ream me
but this is too slow
hatcher is not a book
it's an experience
@flint forge lol nice
Honestly NYU is good at like
hatcher is a great experience
Analysis and applied math
I didn't like Hatcher the first tow times I read it
And that's it, for anything else you might as well go to like
Here's the ideal schedule for grad top. 1) Point set review, weeks 1-4. 2) Concise weaks 4-8 3) More Concise weeks 8-10
also the prof is really nice i want to get him to write me a letter of rec
University of Alabama
weeks 1-4
Now I get what he's going for and it's pretty neat
hn
Apparently Venkatesh was there for a bit so this wasn't always true
I don't know who that is
dami should i sneak hegel into peters proseminar
Why is he teaching this class at a pleb tier level?
i dont know!!!!
Honestly I needed more algebra experience before alg top
Not that the algebra in that class is hard
dami tell me i need to work on my paper
Throwback to knowing what Eilenberg-Maclane spaces are before having a good handle on the dihedral group
I just sucked at algebra
i feel so unmotivated
algebra is good
Max do it or you're a nerd
i draw the arrow i take the quotient everything works out
I don't know if it will hit the same...
@flint forge Do you're paper lol
I believe in you
its not due for like
i just want to go to university already
20 days
hn
and im so tired
grind hasnt quite started
oh no
fuck lens spaces
Lens spaces are cool
Honestly I'm already getting overwhelmed since this semester is hitting me full force
all my homies hate lens spaces
My grind has def started
also i officially went pass john in hatcher
MoonBears likes them

were not homies then
Like thing is I'm basically now doing 4 classes, 2 reading groups, and NSF apps
My algebra professor assigns me 20+ hours of algebra hw a week
Functionally
smartest*
lmao
Who's your competition 
Well eh just 3 classes seriously
topologyest \simeq smartest
you, arch, john, whoever
wut
Since Ginzo rep theory is something for which I can adjust commitment
i rate my approval of the highschoolers here
based on
- politics
- how much AT they talk about
thats it
ok well then im winning on both fronts clearly
Don't you rate everyone based on politics max?
yes but not on how much AT they talk about
for example I respect namington even though he never tells me about k theory
Well does algebraic K-theory count?
algebraic k theory def counts
I've seen him talk about K-theory exactly once
well I talk about neither, so I'm in last place for high schoolers
poco: well when he says politics that can be positive, negative, or 0
If you don't talk politics you're 0
his math takes are so low
If someone has politics he doesn't respect it goes negative
omg what happened to darkrifts
who knows
dark is gone
i think he left the server
we were just too gay
maybe hes just on hopf
Idk if I've ever seen Darkrifts talk politics
he left a lot of servers
or neo hopf
same dami
I've only seen him talk music theory
its yikes
DR's take was deadass "I don't respect gay people, I know this is bad, but Im just too damaged to change"
it sounds like a fratboy breaking up w someone
That's... interesting
That's pretty bad
I don't see how that works by any means
Like you can't muster up respect?
I'm much more conservative than most ppl my age or the internet, but the government has no right in telling people who they can or can't be with
Or how you want to identify
its not necessarily a matter of government tho
Well in that case he'd presumably be neutral then no? Whatever anyway this is a channel for books not Darkrifts lmao
dami were you here for whiteboard girl
The thing is, they want to make things like gay marriage illegal
like if you are homophobic but dont think that the gov should ban gay marriage you're still in the wrong
lets go raid chill then
I've heard of whiteboard girl
i have not max
Anyway book time
tell me the tale
darkriths still active in dms and i think music servers
Which if you're conservative I don't understand, since conservatives want smaller gov't
its almost as if american conservatism is an inconsistent ideology
I mean american politics is pretty inconsistent in general
maybe
whats the big contradiction on the left though
go raid chill sloth
i am multitasking >_<
I like Folland more than papa rudin
But I still prefer Stein and Shakarchi over everything
Alright someone who likes Rudin more get in here
Rudin is great if you have an instructor who like fills in details
But a lot of ppl expect it to be you just sit there and stare at it until it makes sense
Which can be a useful thing to learn, but I think Rudin does a poor job of it
I don't actually know either book I used Bass lol
Or like lecture notes mostly and then a bit of Bass later
I guess the best part is that thanks to the prof in question
Even though I was in that class for just a couple weeks
I have already solved more problems in that book than in like
Any complex analysis book
And tbh in most books
Likely same
I have a weird and mostly not good interaction with complex analysis
I know the theorem statements but haven't done enough good problems
Or bad problems (read: contour integrals)
It's treated as an intro to harmonic analysis
Yo Folland vs Rudin
Since holomorphic functions are harmonic
I like Folland
But I think that just jumping into PDEs or Real Variables is much more useful
Complex analysis is harmonic functions + difftop tbh
Mostly cause he was in those life alert commercials
and some alg. top.
You should have a year long course on complex analysis
Like if you're going to do riemann surfaces
“Help I’ve Folland can’t get up”
Complex analysis still feels like magic to me
I'm learning Elliptic PDEs right now out of Evan's chapter 6
someone needs to write a really good second course in AT book
And then only in third quarter do you define a holomorphic function
there really isnt anything great
I've seen a supposedly decent "first and a half" book
Doesn't hatcher have like
Nah for real I actually really like Folland. More clear and technical in the real part than Rudin is imo. Although I like Rudin.
Lots of material you can dive into
something that like
introduces model categories and spectra
e.g. if you're interested in wirtinger presentations
and localization and completion at primes
And how they're used, you can go further
and spectral sequences
Spanier is Hatcher but more formal and out of date
And covers somewhat different material
Ahh, my CC professors advisor was spanier
Not like harder or easier but orthogonal
So he liked it a lot
yea tbh i have no idea what topology stuff im gonna do after i finish hatcher
You can jump into Low Dimensional
or what the options even are
Characteristic classes is probably a good next step
K-Theory, Morse stuff you need some difftop for but it's good
ugh too much stuff to dooooo
Bott-Tu also
I'm a huge fan of Low Dimensional though
You should probably springboard into manifolds
i should write up a list
Once you have AT down
Knots Knotes and Schulten's 3 manifold Topology
There's lots of entry level research problems
For manifolds try Warner, Lee, or Helgason
Spivak too, I guess volume 1 is pretty much an older version of Lee right?
Spivak has more intuition developed in the pages
Like they're both kinda long chatty straightforward books on the mechanics of manifold theory
And spends more time going from the old notation to the new notation
In case you want to read Riemann's papers or Gauss' papers
So in case you're a nerd
Yeah. The last 3 volumes are highly specialized
But if you're working with diff. geometry the first 2 are standard
But yeah Helgason is what I'm gonna be using probably for getting into the deets of diffgeo
Since it's got an eye toward stuff like symmetric spaces which is what I mainly need
You can also backtrack and go down the analysis route Sloth
There's a lot of stuff in Riemannian that's cool that requires PDEs + manifolds
you cant manifold pill without me to disagree
altho smoothdyn might actually be what manifold pills me
Lol I'm gonna have to learn that too
lmao want the lecture notes
Honestly I feel like I'm in this state where legit every single area of math except for logic is relevant to me
And like that's not an exaggeration
IDK, I think it's ok to specialize and just learn what's important for you
like my top professor can't even define measure
I guess you're all over the place
dami does not have horseblinders on
But you can't learn it all
like a loser
Nah but yeah I do have a vague priority ordering
and then after your postodc
It'd take a real long time to put it all together
But then you're like a jack of all trades
Master of none
For now automorphic forms is the guiding principle
Which can be fun
So the most important things are algebraic number theory and vaguely representation theory/harmonic analysis
Tier 2 importance is what has a lot of stuff
Ahh, they taught Rep Theory in my MS but it conflicted with my work scheduled
schedule
i should make a list of things i want to learn
by automorphic forms to u mean
I was so sad
I made one in pastebin sloth
Does your TA slots ever conflict with classes Sloth King?
I keep it on my phone
It's happened before yeah
That shucks
But for the most part I've been able to work around
also, my list of stuff to learn is pretty much just standard ug stuff; I wanna get a good handle and taste of everything
See ya guys
search it up on yt
Lol this is prob better than how we did it
it starts at 9 est I believe, max
Second quarter of analysis for me Schlag spent just under 2 weeks during ODE
And at the end he talked a bit about Lyapunov functions characterizing stability
I don't know any more details than that, tbh I barely remember what a Lyapunov function is
orbit decreasing
No.
anyone want to livecommentary the debate
post sloth?
144
ty
now join voice
i think ill just come back to this when i want to review my stuff anyway
omg soon
i have like 2 pages left
of this hatcher section
subsection whatever
anyone familiar with "the nature of computation"
anyone familiar with "the nature of computation"
@solemn mantle yes, because I'm always recommending that book
its amazing. read it.
*read it non-linearly.

wut
@sudden kindle hey
Hi
@granite sluice lol all the reviews say it's amazing
I'd like to read it but one person said the exercises required knowledge of graph theory and stuff
You can try it out and fill in background as you go. If you don't have math background it'll be a years long project -- it basically is a years long project for me, and I'm a math phd student...
But there's a lot at different levels. It's a huggeee book.
What book are y’all talking abt
the nature of computation
no
its a big mix of stuff, there are some algorithms focused chapters, and some more theory focused chapters
its just like, a cs theory degree compressed into one book, I guess
none of it is super in depth, but its all pretty rigorous and gives a lot of good intuition
Just want to clarify, that I'd have to dive more into real analysis to learn about series expansions
cuz the one intro to classical mech book I'm using is referring to techniques in series expansions and I have yet to learn that yet. Outside of basic taylor/power series problems in elementary calc
hey. can someone recommend that book ? https://www.amazon.com/Everything-You-Need-Math-Notebook/dp/0761160965/ref=sr_1_4?dchild=1&keywords=math+workbook+for+adults&qid=1601453713&s=books&sr=1-4

thank you . . .
The reviews on Amazon itself seem okay, although what exactly do you need it for?
Practice problems?
Hmm, what is your current background? How much math do you know?
read comments from Benj and Steve, you'll get my POV of my math struggle as someone with ADHD
i know very little math
how should i categorize my math skill?
Oh, I see. This doesn't seem like a good resource then.
This is basically a companion book for middle-schoolers, doesn't seem very useful all by itself.
Being curious is good
yup
Did I mention I hate math? It has always been (and continues to be) the thing with which I struggle most, academically speaking. I find that there aren't really decent resources for people like me, with minds like mine. It's written about by people who "get it", and to them it's so simple that they in turn expect you to just "get it". This book is really no exception. It's more colorful, but it's written with that same hard-and-fast "simple rules to remember" format as math textbooks 20 years ago. Nothing is in plain (enough) language, and very little time is taken to help those of us who can never seem to just "go through the motions" understand the WHY of math. For me, this is the hardest thing. Okay, you flip the fraction. But why? How does it work? Because this goes unsatisfied, I feel like I don't get it, and out of my mind it goes. Lots of folks are this way. I need to see how it works, and then I get that "ah ha!" feeling and it just sticks.
i need book that have all above lol
Hmmm, maybe you could start with some non-technical books? They can lure you into studying maths for starters, then you can gradually learn it via other options.
what about pre algebra?
Yeah, this isn't the right book at all in that event.
Have you tried studying from Khan Academy before?
i did, but i need work book with it, something abit more flaw,
more interactive,
so i really want to enjoy math , but watching videos for 30 minutes? i will forget the first 5 after 1 minutes
Yeah, videos can be tiring sometimes. Let me look up for something that caters to your requirements.
thank you so much 🙂
Have you taken a look at AoPS books? Specifically Prealgebra?
nope
I think it answers the "why" and "how" part really well.
And has a lot of problems too
If you can sit down for a bit with a book, it would be a fun book to work through. Some of the problems are challenging and would need more thinking, but that's how you move forward in maths.
i really want to enjoy math . i really do, as many of my field of interest involve ALOT of ,math, :). and well it attracts me, but my ADHD and i guess bad experience with math really turned it into trauma if you get me , so every time i face math issue(just look at it like equation ) (e=mc2) yup that complicated one, but you get the point.,(i dont know how to solve equations so yea)
that one https://artofproblemsolving.com/store ?
Buy print or online math books for gifted students. Purchase a full math curriculum plus math contest preparation for elementary through high school.
Maths becomes fairly intuitive when you understand the bigger picture behind these equations or aid it with some intuition.
Yes, you can find the Prealgebra text there.
Although you may want to get some other recommendations as well, this is a book that I like personally.
(You can download a copy from Libgen and see if it suits you)
thank you so much:)
No worries. In case you hit a roadblock anywhere during your learning process, you can reach out here to get help.
most likely will 🙂
Goodluck!
sure go ahead
Nt book recommendations?
Which kind?
Elementary
Apostol
Is that for elementary or more analytic stuff?
I like Weil's "Number Theory for Beginners"
Not to be confused with "Basic Number Theory"
the GTM heirarchy:
for beginners < introduction to < advanced < basic < foundations of < [no adjectives]
Thanks for the rec, what can I expect to learn from Weil’s nt for beginners?
doesnt weil require comfort with cosets and stuff?
Apostol has the first 4 chapters as elementary
or does it teach that on-the-fly
and doesn't get to the analytic stuff till later
No I'm talking about mega baby Weil
Like he defines N axiomatically
So everything that is used is proven
hm
i remember looking at that text for a result and seeing that his proof was based around some coset stuff
so i guess he teaches that at some point in the middle
In the summer quarter of 1949, I taught a ten-weeks introductory course on number theory at the University of Chicago; it was announced in the catalogue as "Alge bra 251". What made it possible, in the form which I had planned for it, was the fact that Max Rosenlicht, now of ...
Is it possible to prove a something like Euler’s theorem after reading this book, or would that require more study and experience
Sorry if I sound silly
i'd be surprised if it can't
alternatively you can prove euler's theorem from lagrange's theorem with a bit of group theory
Ok thanks for your help guys!
This book introduces group theory
@lost fjord There's a very simple proof which I can give you the sketch or initial idea of
What is it?
let's go to #math-discussion
So after graduate level abstract algebra, whats the next logical algebra topic to study?
oh and can i get a book recommendation with that *
What did you enjoy within algebra?
hmmm
i like geometry, im looking at some algebraIc geometry stuff right now so stuff that goes along well with that would be good
Commutative algebra is prob a good next thing to learn
Perhaps alongside some classical/varieties-y AG
Jacobson is good I gotta read more of that
he had wayyyy more than i needed in it
Tbh I mostly know my algebra from lectures that went out of Dummit and Foote 1-14
i looked at the chapters that were covered in a normal grad course on it
i need to look at the universal stuff again because i forgot it 😦
I didn't take grad algebra here which would've covered also some rep theory (which I've seen), and some commutative algebra
Maybe basic homological stuff
ah
well what was suggested as normal in the book 😉
i remember something on representations and the homological stuff
yes lots of modules
LOTS of modules
ok
is commutative algebra just more stuff on commutive rings fields etc?
and modules -_-
actually whole reason i looked into algebraic geometry was cuz i was trying to learn some stuff about identifying manifolds
i glanced through a book a few years ago and was like meh but then i was told a few things and now im going back
thats homotopy stuff right?
yeah i did that a while ago basic stuff on it
dont remember without the book but i liked the homotopy stuff very interesting
glanced through it i can do bits and pieces
didnt seem very hard to be honest
i like analysis and differential geometry
in particular i like manifold theory and discrete differential geometry
oh yis
butttt apparently theres some nice theories in algebraic geometry for manifolds so i am learning that
jacobian criterion for varieties?'
i did read some differential topology books too because they had a lot on manifolds
Did someone say differential topology?
i certainly did
Nah but yeah manifolds are nice. You might like real algebraic geometry
whats that?
Apparently there's some cool shit involved. I know exactly 2 results in that area
like real analysis meats algebraic geometry?
Studying varieties over real numbers
Apparently it turns out by Stone-Weierstrass that every smooth manifold is diffeomorphic to some real algebraic variety
oh thats cool
(Though this proof is not trivial)
is that both ways?
Well, you need a Jacobian type condition to guarantee smoothness
Given a real variety it's just vanishing locus of finitely many polynomials f_1,...,f_n
maximal rank and fiber manifolds?
But that's just the vanishing locus of f_1^2 + ... + f_n^2
So you really just need that 0 is a regular value of that guy
I don't know this is just things I've been told
oh ok
In general with difftop I like Milnor and Guillemin-Pollack, or Bott-Tu if you're more ballllsy and have more experience
ok
Which is what makes it great
i'll check that out and look into the commutative algebra stuff
Yeah, for what it's worth though I suggested commalg in part because I thought your interest in AG was... I don't wanna say less geometric but that you were coming at it through algebra
no no manifods
If you are going into it at least in part for the geometry then I won't hard recommend that direction
i was talking to cruster about it and he suggested it
well didnt suggest but he told me about it
Maybe algebraic topology is worth learning
Bott-Tu if you wanna go at it hard from the differential forms
i was mostly looking into the algebra stuff because i need the practice in algebra
For some more algebraic stuff that's related to geometry, AG counts but you have to make it geometric, it's very easy to become commalg
Rep theory and Lie groups might also be up your alley
its been a while since i looked at it and i keep forgetting the definitions in the book
ive seen lie groups in my differential geometry book
lie derivatives groups lie everrrytthingggg
Which book
and sufficient for what
Yeah it's good
Is it sufficient to get you a PhD in diff. top?
No
Yeah, tell me when you're done reading those
I like short books when learning a field for the first time
So it conveys the basics
For a lot of ppl in Topology, Milnor is very much sufficient
You don't need to be a research expert in Diff. Top. to be interested in Topology
Topology is a big field, there's lots of stuff going on
If you're interested after Milnor, you can read more
but if you're not interested and you try Lee
I read Milnor before taking grad topology, and I found it sufficient
For the 3 courses I did
Do you guys have any book recommendations for learning more about quantifiers and epsilon-N limits? My Calc 2 class is revisiting limits and our book doesn’t have this topic but I want an extra supplement
rudin
seriously speaking, this is the main topic of introductory real analysis
well, the first month or so of real analysis
so any real analysis book should theoretically do the job, but many (e.g. rudin) are gonna be a lot more intense than you probably signed up for lmao
for something more approachable, you could look into, for example, Spivak's Calculus
which is a text that tries to bridge the gap between the conventional calculus curriculum and this more definition-oriented thinking
prove all the limits in the first section on limits or smth in ur calc book
heh, thats probably not a bad exercise
Find a logics book, then come back to maths and cry because they use different notations

Does anyone have experience with Paul Sally's Fundamentals of Mathematical Analysis
specifically for self-study
I know that it's not adequate on its own due to lack of solutions, but some people have suggested using Pugh and Rudin (for the exercises) alongside eachother
So I'm wondering if I could switch Pugh's with Sally's
someone knows any book about techniques of euclidean geometry?
euclid's elements


I need a book recommendation about epsilon delta formulation of limits, such as those in continuity, differentiability and Riemann integrability.
So the concept of limits in terms of epsilon delta
Literally any analysis book
If you want the classical recc look at Rudin
If you want something less hard, try Spivak
Alright I got Rick Durett's Probability: theory and examples from the library, hope it's good

@dapper root something else than those ?
baby Rudin is often recommended
I don't know if it's good tho
But any book about real analysis should do tbh
What makes it better than other books
I think pugh writes in a very engaging and intuitive way, and he proves most of the basic theorems using solely completeness of reals after constructing them with cuts
Dedekind cuts 🤢
his section on metric spaces and topology is also very good, and the chapter that proves all the basic calculus theorems (pre integral calculus) is very slick
non good pdf of pugh are avaiable 😦
can you get it :D? @sleek python
Thanks!
@hollow peak i like pugh because the only thing i ever do is visualize
that's right 
and pugh has all the pretty pictures suited for my way of thinking
Ahh that must be the second edition
Oh dude I got that down
One sec
Smooth spheres stand so tall
as to bound a 3-ball.
Techniques by which I know not,
stretch and play
with manifolds, like clay
With no saddles, nor horse
we choose a path, not so coarse
paven by Morse.
Plane and Simple, each curves level;
from Jordan I force, a smooth radius isotopic two, of course!
With one saddle and one horse, nested or nay
make what we may -
The planes of day: figure 8's skate and slice
spheres to disks, 3: A, B, C
Containing their highs and lows,
max's and min's.
Yet a plane so great,
two disks in the
figure eight -
one is bounded and one not
shares borders with, say, A.
By paste and glue, a sphere
shall appear. A sphere,
made of clay - again push
and play, come what
may. It's critical, I say!
On this path, on our way;
we've lost our saddles, today!
Now this lovely sphere,
stands so tall
as to bound
a 3-ball.
(A proof by poem for the base case to prove Schoenflies theorem)
Is it as good @gray gazelle?
hello frens
I am self learning Calculus at the moment using Larson's which is very good illustrated and also seeking help from this server.
I was wondering if there are similar books for linear algebra and probability which are academic enough to pass as an uni book but also light and illustrated enough like Larson's Calculus to be used for self learning.
Thanks
@pearl imp A lot of people like the book "linear algebra done right" (Axler). Maybe try it out.
I'm still early calculus, like just learned definite integrals
Integrals are hard
like the concepts or the calculations and nitty gritty?
Sometimes the concepts are hard with integrals, sometimes the calculations are very difficult
There's several books on Tricky Integrals
the mathematical definitions and formalities really get to me, but I feel I can relate with the concepts
Hmm ok
what's MSE?
Math stack exchange
O
It's an online forum for math students to ask and answer questions
They range from very simple to very difficult
In all kinds of fields
I think I once asked a question there and was frowned upon bc I was too dum dum
Happens to almost anyone with their first question lol

But it's a good community if you can state your problem precisely and show your efforts at approaching the problem
👍
ive considered contributing to stackexchange/mathoverflow
I have some unanswered questions on stack exchange
id probably want to do it under a real name though
If anyone's trying to answer
I wonder how hard it would be to get top 0.1%
Send me the link, I'll bounty em
Qiaochu style
Uh have you tried posting these on MO?
No
Could be the case that you need some experts looking over them
I'd say there's no harm in cross-posting on MO
I'll bounty this, let's see what turns up.
oh hell ya. I bountied this once
Reason for starting bounty: Draw attention?
Or should I do "Authoritative reference needed"/"Canonical answer required"?
👍
Any custom message you'd like to add?
Explaining what you'd like to see in the answer?
An explanation of how Mikhail Gromov's argument on page 11-12 of Gromov's "Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Spaces"
Proves this result
I asked Gromov himself, but I didn't understand his reply
Since that's included within the body of your question Ig I don't have to add a message at all, your question is fairly self contained imo
I asked Gromov himself, but I didn't understand his reply
Hahaha, really??
Yeah
Ty bbcakes
Np; if nothing shows up I suggest cross-posting on MO lol
It was for a research project I had to do in Knot Theory
like kinda mathematical exposition on knot distortion. I wrote like 7 pages
Just summarizing current research on it
Anything that follows the word "research" naturally goes to MO lol, MSE is, imo, better for math up to the graduate level.
@sweet lotus lmao that gromov screenshot. I want to believe.
Its real
@marble solar yes, although i have absolutely no idea what that theorem is lol (was in lecture so i couldn't get back to it)
everyone talking about how they speed up lectures and here i am pausing every 2 minutes to think
It says that every smooth S^2 sphere in R^3 or S^3 bounds a 3 ball
anyone doing phd or msc here
Me, Moonbears, Ultraproduct, Liquid, Namington, and Crustle are graduate students for sure
Or well Moonbears is in a transitionary period I guess but has a masters
Some others too but I forget offhand
i'm starting high school next year
No Dami ur a first grader
but i'm gonna get my phd one day
Chmonkey shh
I’m going for PhD now
I currently plan on it but life has it out for me man
how are u gonna coordinate with ur wife? (im assuming she has a job where u currently live together, or maybe not, i guess u guys could be LDR)
We live together
I'm from socal, so there's a lot of schools with tech jobs for her
Currently in Seattle
as in, you would be looking at doing a phd at a school in socal?
It seems to be the most likely scenario
what if you don't get into any schools in socal?
or, any schools that do any of the math fields ur interested in
(i'm just trying to get an understanding of the thought process for this kinda thing, like i'm not married but i might be interested in doing a phd at some point, and i could be married at that point)
The likelihood of my not getting into a socal school is so low
There's Irvine, Riverside, SB, USC, ucla, and Caltech
The first 4 I can get in
The last two no way in hell
i guess that makes sense
I have 3 very strong letters + research. My GPA is lower than your usual admit
But I'm not applying to top tier schools
is it because you suspect you won't get in, or because even if you got in you wouldn't go?
actually, if you got into a school where ur wife might have a hard time getting a job, what would u do?
I'm only applying to places for which there are job opportunities
for her
My wife works for amazon as a techie right now
I'm not applying to top tier schools for several reasons. 1. is I won't get in. 2. is I don't like the students there 3. is I don't like the professors there 4. is I enjoy my free time
what do you mean by 2 and 3 if you don't mind taking the time to answer?
Ok, so I don't exactly have your typical background ~ I come from a lower middle class family. Almost went homeless due to the 2008 crisis
I didn't start doing mathematics till I was 18 years old
I went to community college. I'm not some super smart quick problem solver
I take my time, I mull it over I think about it. I talk to my friends, and then I get to it
The way top schools operate is you have to be on high performance all the time
I don't like that. I like my free time to explore my interests and take things at my pace
I'm also terrible at doing mathematics rigorously by myself
I'm a very much into following your gut and intuition, and discuss with friends to fill in details
There was one point in grad school where I was working 55 hours a week
On top of the full-time load
A lot of the people at bigger and better schools just have no understanding of what I've gone through or what it means
ah yeah that sounds like hell
I went to LA for my undergrad, and LA isn't exactly full of friendly people
A lot of them are pretty toxic, chasing status rather than developing themselves. The professors feed off of this competition
And if you're not their super star student, they brush you away
Not really a mindset I enjoy. So I'd much rather go to a school like USC where they pay you over 10k more than UCLA does
for their stipend
Even if I went to Riverside, I would just be one of the best students there and get lots of personal attention
And if you're not their super star student, they brush you away
@marble solar even tao?
The ranking of the school doesn't matter as much as the work you produce
Yes
My friend had a letter of rec from Terry. He told Terry he got into UT Austin for analysis
Terry said "Good." and walked away
At most he allocates 10 minutes to people he likes
He really liked one of my friends and gave him 30 minutes on advice
In fact, the friend he really liked got into UCLA for PhD and terry told him "You can come here, but go somewhere else. It'll be better"
And they offered him 22k/year
Which is the lowest offer he got and Westwood is very expensive to live in
Like 3k/mo for a 1 bedroom apt
There's not a whole lot of mentorship at LA, no professor will "take you under their wing" and support you
Although you can get a second to none education there, especially in analysis
You ever had a final due over spring break?
You ever had 6 hour finals in a classroom?
You ever had a professor grade 1 problem out of 20 and fail half the class on that assignment? Ever had a professor say only 2 questions on a midterm, not covering a section and then put that section as one of the two questions?
Yeah shit like that made me get over LA fast
I never had night terrors before I went to LA, the stress was almost unbearable at times. I saw 5 people completely break down
Schizophrenia, Depression, Physical sickness, etc.
And these were people that studied hard. People that were taking grad courses their sophomore year
The pressure to keep performing well there is insane
And the professors don't ever let up
I will never go back to such an environment again
I'd much rather go to Riverside and raise a family
Go to USC, and make more money, have more free time
/rant.
Although, when I left UCLA I found I was significantly better at Analysis than nearly all of my classmates
In Grad School
And that the education I got truly was world class, it was just pure torture going through it at times
I'm sure sloth king or m*x have similar stories at UChicago
But I ain't standin' for it. Mental health is important
Mental & Physical health is the most important things you have
The MS program I went to was almost the complete opposite of my experience at LA, only retaining the great education part
You can ask zetamath for more on that
where did(do) you go for MS?
CSULB
Small state school right outside Los Angeles
(Not really small, but small math department. Few active researchers, but amazing professors and community)
I made 2 friends in my time at LA, and I made many more at LB
and I am an extremely social person
can you talk more about what you mean about great education? (i guess to me great education sounds like stuff along the lines of, professors give really interesting lectures, or something like that)
The two best math professors I've ever had are both at CSULB, they gave interesting lectures, good homework problems
Stopped at nothing to help you, had great sense of humors
I mean, we'd go over to dinner parties at a professors house
i see yeah, i had a prof that gave good homework problems too in college and i liked that (never had a dinner party though lol)
The grad students started playing ping pong in the TA room, and the math department chair walked by, looked mad, walked away, walked back with his paddle
and proceeded to whoop our asses at ping pong
He had a freaking ping pong paddle in his bag
Like his own
nice lol
After grad classes, we'd go to the volleyball court
and just play beach volleyball
Till we were too tired to continue
it was very much a work hard/play hard time of mentality
instead of just working hard all the time
Almost everyone in my cohort is now in a PhD program
Or full-time employed. I'm one of the stragglers
Chicago's stressful for sure but... not unbearably so? Idk
Like idk I feel there's a point where it's too far
Chicago comes as close as possible without crossing it for the most part
So like you'll be hyperventilating in exam time, sleep deprived, stressed, etc
But not as likely to completely break you know?
@marble solar are you describing UCLA or Caltech?
Oh Ig UCLA.
Ngl you kinda worry me with your descriptions haha.
I'm from the midwest, on a gap year rn as an incoming freshman and I'm going to LA for UG.
Ig LA might refer to UCLA instead of the town on the second read, which is a relief
I feel like Imma get my butt kicked by the sudden change of both education and scenery and it low key worries me.
Which Ig also is why I came here. I wanted to know if you guys had some suggestions on an order of mathematics books.
I figured I'd brush up on reading Tom Apostol's Calculus series, move onto stuff like diff eq and abstract algebra, but Idk about where everything else might be well placed.
I have books on analysis and topology as well a lot of others, but Ig I just want a general feel of what a good path might be. I'd expect there'll be some overlap, deviations, and just sheer preference, but just wanna make sure.
I can vouch for @marble solar UC’s like UCLA are straight time consuming for mental health. I also go to a small state university in california kinda close to moonbears, and my time with the math department have been amazing compared to what I hear happens at some UC’s. One of my professor’s had a social gathering with both his grad and undergrad students at an outdoor bar. I went and it was a fun time. A lot of the professor’s at schools like these treat students like friends and we have a pretty close knit math community. Yah they might be tough during class time, but as a prof outside of class time, you sometimes get to know them on a personal level; and ofc they always lend a hand with trying to help their students succeed and put their time aside to make sure it happens as long as you put the effort in as well.
I also had a professor who threw a bbq once btw and that was pretty cool. I’m not suited for super big schools either for similar reasons to moonbears. Also coming from lower middle class, there’s that financial barrier of extreme debt, and the character of people at big schools. Not all big schools tho. There are a still a select number of big schools in california that have just as an amazing demographic of students in the math department like small state universities here. I would just prefer this small state uni kinda environment as it’s a lot more fun; plus, math, although tough at times, shouldn’t make us feel like prisoners to the time we spend on it. Everyone has their preferences tho. There’s always room for growth, and being in a healthy environment for that growth is what makes learning it worthwhile and enjoyable.
@marble solar I’m eventually going to have to figure out how to get some letters of recommendation outside of academia and try to get some write ups published when my blog matures
But I’m essentially just starting out taking mathematics as a serious endeavor
It is a bit of a shame that I blew my chance to go to grad school for math in the near future at the moment
For me it’s not important, going back to school. All that matters is I enjoy math. A number of people, until I have my blog maturing the way I want it to, are going to probably tell me I’m wasting my time.
@hearty steppe idt you’re wasting your time dude. Part of life is finding meaning in what makes you happy. And the struggles that come along the way. There’ll be haters, but most would just be jealous and would prefer to spend their free time putting others down. Do your thing man, everyone works at their own pace 👌🏽
Yea I mean this is probably the wrong place to discuss this. I just figured I’d chime in. Most of my colleagues support my endeavor but there will always be a few engineering colleagues of mine that will not understand. I have a software engineering/comp sci background. Engineering was not for me. I knew it wasn’t right before I finished my comp sci degree. I just happen to be good at coding sure, but it just bores me these days. Coding has no meaning for me outside of mathematics.
The computational realm of math is still of interest to me but I am getting more into theoretical math
out of curiosity, do people study coding in and of itself?
im not sure what that would encompass
I mean there is algorithms
Coding is a tool
And you can study systems/circuits
ah true
And languages
also sudden change of topic, but what books are good as companions for Hardy's divergent series?
dang math is hard
Should have figured that a lot earlier
yea
i thought like math is hard but like bearable
didnt know ppl can actually get sick
from this shit
why do people do this
passion
?
mental illness in academia is pretty widespread actually
yea like wow
it's not a math thing
this is something hard to believe for me
yea yea i get it
but id guess math is at the top\
i never met irl a grad stud ora nything
but yea everytime i be on /reddit math
i must see a post talking about how hard grad life is
and like 100 comments agreeing
well, most of them you wouldn't guess it if you saw them irl
and by hard i mean like
also notice that reddit is mostly people that want to complain
mentally exhausting no life no fun depression anxiety hard
like, nobody who is fine will go to reddit and write about how not mentally ill he is
yea i get it
but i just wanna ask
why do people do it
do they get off from the difficulty
"just x more years, then it gets better"
does it?
i don't know
i never met irl a grad stud ora nything
Nice jojo ref
but it's easy to tell that to yourself
speaking as a non-grad mentally ill person
why do you have to go to uni to stud ymath?
cant you study math from textbooks?
legit asking
i dont think so
if you are super big brain maybe
yeah, but
they still have people to talk to
and at some point you just need guidance
because you run out of books
like, i think guidance in the beginning is very important
so you learn to read and do mathematics
and like the probablity of living a financially easy and good life
and then later it is important
yea yea i get it
because another person has to tell you what to study
you need people to teach you and tel you what to do
and tell you which paths are bad which paths are good
also you need to go to uni to get a degree
yea i meant like
why ddidnt math majors just read textbooks and get their degree in like
business
and have a way easier life
because math is very time consuming
and like, i don't think getting a math degree is harder on your mental health than other degress
it might change when doing a phd
you can just get a math degree and then start working
yes
but like i meant like
the math 'lover' path waay
the grad school math pathway
i think imo math bsc is easy to get even if udont understand shit
u will work your way through
ok, you can't devote the amount of time required to mathematics, if you are doing a business degree on the side
or working a 40hr week
mathematics is so toxic
Can I weigh in?
why toxic?
Ok it took a turn
and like i just feel frustrated why the fk are u doing that
u can just do a cs bsc and be a programmer and live your life
just x more years until my phd
forget all this stupid shit
@marble rock why does anyone do anything?
but at the same time
its fun
math is super cool
so its toxic
maybe its bec i read alot of reddit posts on grad life i have this opinion
i am p sure others are enjoying their time in grad
right?
try talking with actual grad students
but like
they wont tell a random person about their mental health problems
I want to talk to grad student
idk this just came from reading @marble solar
the grad students in my department seem happy 🤷
yea
@stray veldt what department are you in?
mathematics is so toxic
@marble rock ask moonbears
I started a shit storm in book discussion; if anyone has further questions please pm me
yea book discussion question:
what do you guys think of reading papa rudin after baby rudin
Do you mean boolean algebra?
I dislike papa rudin
Or is computer algebra a superset?
Real and Complex is papa while Principles is baby Rubin
no, we study algebraic geometry and number theory using computer algebra systems
There's a lot of detail that is left out of papa rudin
i.e. mostly computational questions
Big Rudin doesn't seem to do Caratheodory extension, rather he just jumps to Riesz rep
So you only know how to construct Borel measures
yes loch
i only used it as a reference
If you wanna study modern real analysis I think you’ll get more mileage out of something like Folland or Royden
for measure theory there are plenty of good books
I don't like this choice tbh, I feel like if nothing else it's bad for probability
like i think this shit doesnt end RA
I don't know how the exposition is like
Folland looks good at a glance, I also like "Real Analysis for Graduate Students" by Bass
i stil didnt get to measure theory
@sage python is reading more RA after baby rudin
important for non RA things
Measure theory can kick in a bit elsewhere
Even things like proving rectangles in R^d are countable unions of open sets
Especially Fourier business
baby rud has measure theory
Rudin leaves it out
Do not read the last chapter of Baby Rudin
Who does measure from baby rudin?
It's awful
Honestly don't read the last 3 chapters
okay



