#help-0

1 messages · Page 767 of 1

ocean sealBOT
#

RipeOrange

topaz scaffold
#

Just solve for the normal force

#

Which would be perpendicular to the wall

#

@fickle dew

fickle dew
#

Not sure I'm quite following, so I get the Ff from m . g then ÷ it by the u (dont have the character) to get the Fn?

topaz scaffold
#

mg is your force of gravity

#

Denoted by F_g here

#

μ is the coefficient of friction

topaz scaffold
#

Just need to plug in numbers

fickle dew
#

I see I see, thank you!

topaz scaffold
#

No problem!

ivory otter
#

no clue how to solve it

#

i was thinking, what if i calculate the area of the triangle (everything above h)

#

then i subtract

#

eeeeeh not sure tbh

topaz scaffold
#

Actually I should have drawn the orange line in a different place oof

#

Do try to use the radius tho

ivory otter
#

i think they want me to solve it in another way

topaz scaffold
#

Finding the area would be a lot harder tho

ivory otter
#

no i think your way is the way

#

mb

#

hmmmmm

#

im just gonna pray i dont get this question during exam

#

best way to solve it tbh

topaz scaffold
#

lol

simple stream
#

question

#

you have a cup of coffee at temperature 70 C and you immediately pour in 1 part milk to 5 parts coffee. The milk is initially at temperature 1 C. Write the differential equation that governs the temperature of the coffee

uncut tapir
#

Some things to consider:

The milk will heat up and the coffee will cool down until they are the same temperature

The coffee will 'win' because there's more of it, meaning that the final temperature would be closer to 70 than 1

#

Are you given heat capacities?

ivory otter
#

I must have Done something wrong with the last calculation
can someone look at it?

uncut tapir
#

Why do you think it's wrong?

ivory otter
#

cuz the answer is 1.96 * 10^-4

#

doubt thats the answer

uncut tapir
#

Seems like it makes sense with your input and output though

#

Why did you do Sum xy and Sum x^2 though

#

Don't you need these formulae?

ivory otter
#

this is what we use

uncut tapir
#

They are probably the same tbh

#

I don't see anything obvious

bleak basalt
#

how can inclusive or be used in such a way where p, q, and r, are statements like 'we will be using this coding language in the class', 'we will be using that coding language in the class', and 'we will be using the other coding language in the class'? I am supposed to write a sentence for (p and q) or r, with those statements. but i dont see how it could be inclusive or rather than exclusive

placid zinc
#

Inclusive or, usually given the symbol V, means "take option 1, option 2, or both options"

sullen bobcat
#

Hello ! How are you ?

placid zinc
#

Truth table explains all:
p q p V q
0 0 0
1 0 1
0 1 1
1 1 1

uncut tapir
#

For me, those statements seem to imply you are using all 3 in the same class?

sullen bobcat
#

I've lots of difficult in English. Can we speak a little French please ?

sullen bobcat
placid zinc
#

@bleak basalt
Did I help make it more clear? It's not all too clear what you're asking

sullen bobcat
#

I'm level A2 in English CECRL

#

With Google translate

bleak basalt
#

I understand the difference between or and xor, i just dont understand how OR could possibly be applied to this specific situation

placid zinc
#

(p and q) or r?

sullen bobcat
#

Can you help me ?

bleak basalt
#

since the scenario, for example, is something like "we will be using either a combination of java and C, or python". But in that example, the or is exclusive

sullen bobcat
#

@bleak basalt

placid zinc
#

Do you mean this?

#

Expressing XOR with AND and OR?

sullen bobcat
#

@placid zinc Can you speak French ?

bleak basalt
#

i dont understand your question really. Im supposed to formulate a sentence for p and q, inclusive or r

#

and my problem is i can only think of sentences for the given values of p, q, and r, in which the or is exclusive

placid zinc
#

p XOR q = (q or p) and (p' or q')
Where ' means complement, or NOT

#

Is one way to express it

bleak basalt
#

but I mean i need to come up with an actual english sentence that would make the expression true

placid zinc
#

I have no idea what you're asking

bleak basalt
#

okay so lets say p is soup, and q is salad. My assignment question is "write a sentence for which s is true in the expression s=p^q". The correct answer for this question would be "i will give you both soup and salad"

placid zinc
#

"I will give you soup or salad, but not both"

sullen bobcat
#

@placid zinc @bleak basalt

#

HELLO !!!!!!!!

novel siren
#

@sullen bobcat le salon est déjà occupé, pose ta question dans #help-5 jvais voir si jpeux aider ou au moins traduire

bleak basalt
#

yes, and now I am trying to do something similar to the example that I have just given, except it is for the p, q, and r values, and expression that I mentioned above. Does that make sense?

placid zinc
#

We may be using a combination of Java and C, but if we don't, we will be using Python instead

bleak basalt
#

okay and that wouldnt be exclusive? because if we use python instead, doesnt that mean its only python and the combination is excluded?

placid zinc
#

That's a good idea, "only Python" to make it more clear

radiant karma
#

Hi can someone help me differentiate this

placid zinc
#

First do chain rule:
1/(xe^x) times d/dx(xe^x)

bleak basalt
#

but its supposed to be inclusive, not exclusive

radiant karma
#

I got (1+x)e^x / xe^x

placid zinc
#

Yes that looks right

#

Note the e^x can cancel

radiant karma
#

why does the mark scheme say this

jolly stone
#

log(xe^x) = log(x)+log(e^x) = log(x)+x

#

[assuming log is base e]

radiant karma
#

Ohhhh

#

I just realised lmao

#

theyre both equivalent haha

#

not a multiplication of each other

#

thanks guys!

jolly stone
#

had the same story with my calc professor lol, gave a whole page to find derivative of (x^-3+x^-2)/(x^-1). people did shittons of work with product rule and such, and then me and my friend did this in 2 lines

prime lake
#

I need help clarify something for me. The square root property is when you got x^2=9 u get x=squareroot9 or x=-squareroot9 but the thing is, ive seen some people put parentheses on minus x=(-)squareroot9, what does that mean? is it to define that it's positive only?

jolly stone
#

but when if you want to find sqrt(9), it is defined as the only positive value sqrt(9) = 3

#

so if someone said -sqrt(9) it means -3

#

the parenthesis thing i've never seen it before

prime lake
#

for an example, the length of a side is never negative

#

i think thats why?

jolly stone
#

did you see that on the geometry problem or just anything in general

prime lake
#

but it's fallacy still, square of two negative and positive yield positive anyway. but if we are saying that a pythagorean theorem u have c^2=a^2+b^2 and if u square root, u never get negative one

jolly stone
#

cuz it's just weird to write out negative

#

yeah exactly

#

i mean, it's true if x = -3, x^2 = 9

#

but if x is a side length, x can never be -3 anyways

prime lake
#

it can but its not practical. lets say one side is negative and another is negative depends where u put your origo xD yield then positive area 😄

#

but the question is, what is the name called that u put the parantheses on the minus? i dont find any website or books yet that show the definition and explanation

crude viper
#

Why is it that a/b*b/a = 1 no matter what?

wary stream
#

Because the numerators and denominators cancel out and make 1

#

$$\frac{a}{b}\times \frac{b}{a}$$

ocean sealBOT
#

dldh06

crude viper
wary stream
#

$$\frac{4}{6}\times \frac{6}{4} = \frac{4 \cdot 6}{6 \cdot 4}$$

ocean sealBOT
#

dldh06

wary stream
#

The 6 in the numerator and denominator cancels to be 1, and same with the 4

thorn kindle
#

you can prove this using the mathematical principle of induction

crude viper
alpine sable
#

$$ test $$

ocean sealBOT
#

shira ツ

alpine sable
#

To do this I just need to change x and y to 1?

$$ f(1,1) = ln(x + y - 1) $$

ocean sealBOT
#

shira ツ

topaz scaffold
#

Yea

crude viper
faint oasis
crude rose
#

when something is notated as (g o f)(x) is that the same as g(f(x))

thorn vortex
arctic delta
#

anyone know what happened here

#

i know you sub in 2-x for u and stuff like that

#

but am unsure how to fit u into the other terms like x-1

placid zinc
#

If u = 2 - x
Then x = 2 - u
And finally x - 1 = (2 - u) - 1

#

Or x - 1 = 1 - u

arctic delta
#

ahh i see

#

whered the powers come from?

faint oasis
thorn vortex
#

what don't you understand in what i just said

faint oasis
#

basically the entire thing

#

well mostzly the part where u talk about the same chord

thorn vortex
#

don't you know what is a chord

faint oasis
#

like a striaght line

thorn vortex
#

it is a segment that joins two points of a circle

ivory zodiac
#

so here's the first part of that question

#

plugging everything in, F is equal to 28.936

prime mural
#

?

surreal sphinx
#

what is the law of exponent in (2x^3)(3x^5)

#

<@&286206848099549185>

oak chasm
#

@surreal sphinx Rearrange it so that the nonvariables are together and all the variables are with the same variable.

#

2 · 3x³x⁵.

#

Then multiply the different groups together.

#

2 · 3 = 6

#

x³x⁵ = x⁸

#

6x⁸.

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

alpine sable
#

Hello can anyone help me with this question ?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

need help with wheer to start

wanton beacon
#

Ik this a dumb question but i forgot, would (6 2/7 * 6 2/7) + (196 * 98) be the association property of addition or multiplication?

#

Pls someone answer lol

sly mantle
# alpine sable https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/328208536029102081/880604620622291014/unk...

there are 2 steps to prove unique existence, existence & uniqueness. to show existence, we must show there exists a definition of addition & multiplication on F satisfying the above conditions. to show uniqueness, we must show that if there exist two pairs of definitions of addition & multiplication on F satisfying the above conditions, let's call em +/* & [+]/[*], then +=[+] & *=[*] (the equality here means equality of functions since addition & multiplication are formally functions FxF->F)

wanton beacon
#

Could someone pls quickly answer my question

west bronze
wanton beacon
#

Ty very much

tranquil sierra
#

How do they get that pi/6 value?

glass lichen
tranquil sierra
#

Where do we get the 30˚?

#

nvm I'm an idiot

median tendon
#

Just curious, why is the integral of a square wave a triangular wave? Since integration is the area, shouldn't the triangular wave start with a step? (the area under the square wave starts with a number larger than 0)

topaz scaffold
#

The square wave has constant values

#

So when you integrate it you get the linear increases and decreases of the the triangular wave

#

You could also go backwards and imagine what the derivative of the triangular wave would be

#

@tranquil sierra

orchid tapir
#

is there precal tutors or something? I'm new to this whole discord tutoring thing

quasi bloom
#

What

#

I fucked up

#

Someone please explain

quasi bloom
#

I obviously am missing a big portion of trig

#

Since I wasn't making trig functions negative when they needed to be

wary stream
split slate
#

How did I get this wrong?

#

$Pop_{\text{in 4 years time}} = 3425 - ((3425 \times 0.03) \times 4)$

ocean sealBOT
#

HappyAlt

split slate
#

Should equal 3014

wary stream
#

Isn't supposed to be an exponential function?

split slate
#

Then how would I do it?

#

Could you please explain?

quasi bloom
split slate
#

oh nvm I got my thingo

#

carry on

wary stream
quasi bloom
#

is that all?

#

i meant i don't know how to solve them

wary stream
#

You did everything correctly, you just forgot to account for that negative value that was given

quasi bloom
#

am i not supposed to work with an obtuse angle?

#

also wouldn't -6.8^2 + 3.5^2 = 58.49

#

where did 5849 come from

faint oasis
kind solstice
#

I don't know what to do with the "x+" and "1-". How to solve it? I'm stuck with those two things, but I don't know how to proceed, I know the answer but don't know how to solve the question! I need to simplify the fraction! Thanks for the help!

faint oasis
#

<@&286206848099549185>

sage bronze
#

$\frac {x+ \frac {y-x}{1+xy}}{1 - \frac {xy - x^{2}}{1+xy}} = \frac {\frac {(y-x) + x(1+xy)}{1+xy}}{\frac {1(1+xy) - (xy - x^{2})}{1+xy}}$

ocean sealBOT
#

HELLOBELLO

kind solstice
#

Thanks!!

sage bronze
#

np

ember night
#

Hey so I have a number that get's multiplied by 0.25, for example 100, which is 75. How can I find out by how much I need to multiply 100 in the first place so that value - 75 = 100, the same number?

placid zinc
#

So (0.25)100 = 25

#

You'd multiply 25 by 4, in order to get 100 back

ember night
#

yea i know.. it's hard for me to explain

#

I need to provide a formula

#

like

#

if I multiply 100 by 1.25 (add 25%) and then by 0.75 (substract 25%) I get 93.75

#

And I need to get back to 100 again

#

In the first step I need to multiply by something that gets me to 133 which is the value that after 25% (1.25) gets me to 100

#

But I don't know how to find it as a formula

placid zinc
#

93.75x = 100
x = 100/93.75

ember night
#

right.. and multiply by 1.25 and then that by 100

placid zinc
#

You're very unclear. Can you list out, like with steps, what exactly you are doing to this number?

#

And what you are trying to have the number match?

ember night
#

you already solved my issue

placid zinc
#

Okay! Great haha

opal gulch
#

there was a family

#

they ate garlic bread every day

#

3 of them in total, two parents and an only child

#

they where in bliss

#

but then

#

another gremlin child was born

#

now 4 people ate garlic bread

#

what fraction of garlic bread did each of the original three lose

vale wigeon
#

depends on how much garlic bread the new child eats in relation to the parents and the first child
and whether or not the total amount of garlic bread eaten by the family has changed with the birth of the new child

opal gulch
#

no

#

they all eat the same amount of garlic bread

#

an equal amount

#

and the amount of garlic bread is the same

#

I think I know the answer but I might be wrong

vale wigeon
#

and what do you think the answer is?

opal gulch
#

1/3 = 33.3333333333
1/4 = 25
33.3333333-25 = 8.33333333
100/8.33333 = 12

12 3

  •      ===>       -
    

100 25

#

I think they all lost three twenty fifths

placid zinc
#

Imagine there's 12 loaves of garlic bread every day. How many each did the 3 eat? How many each do the 4 eat now?

opal gulch
#

oh no

#

but if you carry the 44 around the three it equals the answer

#

yep makes sense

next hatch
#

how do i do b?

#

im a bit confused

#

seems like integration by parts but i tried it and it doesnt work

split oriole
#

You can solve 1st by substituting 2x^4+16=t

thin urchin
#

so they gave me a distance formula and asked me to calculate the average velocity

next hatch
thin urchin
#

am i starting about this right?

next hatch
#

its b im confused on

#

sorry boss question's already being asked

#

ive tried doing ln(x) = du/dx and the other one being v(x)

#

and vice versa

#

and both scenarios have lead me to weird integrals

split oriole
next hatch
#

wdym

split oriole
#

Take log with x^1/2 , and other ,then try to apply the integration by parts

next hatch
#

ohhhhh

#

OHHHHH

#

huge brain

#

gimme a secf

split oriole
#

👍

astral dagger
ocean sealBOT
#

SubGui

next hatch
#

im still confused with that

astral dagger
#

maybe it works, maybe not

#

lemme double check before

next hatch
#

yep

#

is this right so far?

rigid smelt
#

Instead of expanding

#

Just do ibp right away

next hatch
#

i tried that

rigid smelt
#

You just have to integrate (...) as a whole

next hatch
#

it gave me some fucko answer

rigid smelt
#

Can you show your work?

next hatch
#

i kinda crossed it out lol

rigid smelt
#

Sigh

next hatch
#

,t 270

#

,r 270

#

,rotate 270

ocean sealBOT
next hatch
#

there we go

#

if u can read that props to u

#

if not ill try it again

rigid smelt
#

If you had
(x^(1/2)-6x^3)/x -
integral of (3/2 * x^(3/2) - 3/2 * x^4)/x dx

#

Then thats correct

next hatch
#

so the x^1/2 part is the derivative

rigid smelt
#

No

next hatch
#

no no

#

i mean like

rigid smelt
#

ln has to be u

#

Because integrating ln(x) is troublesome

next hatch
#

yes

#

i meant like

#

that x^1/2 at the start

#

is dv/dx

rigid smelt
#

Uh no, (x^(1/2) - 6x^3) is dv

next hatch
#

yes

#

thats what i meant

rigid smelt
#

Then yeah

#

If you make no mistakes then you are on your way

#

And by the seem of it

#

You were doing good

#

The integral after the ibp is not very hard

#

Oh nvm, you messed up your uv

#

but the integral vdu is good

next hatch
#

this is right yeah?

rigid smelt
#

Yes

next hatch
#

okay

rigid smelt
#

Your work was almost correct

next hatch
#

and to find v(x) i integrate dv(x)/dx

next hatch
#

cuz if ln is u

rigid smelt
#

Again, dv=ln(x)

next hatch
#

then wouldnt the equation be ln x * v(x)

rigid smelt
#

What equation?

next hatch
#

didnt u say it was u

rigid smelt
#

We dotn have any equation

rigid smelt
#

Oh wait

next hatch
rigid smelt
#

Ughh nvm

#

Brain fart

#

I need my coffee

next hatch
#

so we have to integrate ln?

#

lmao feels

rigid smelt
#

No no, u=ln(x)

#

Its just me having a stroke

#

Yeah nvmyour work is good

#

Continue with the integral

next hatch
#

lmao aight

#

i got this so far

rigid smelt
#

Yes

next hatch
#

so then its uv - integral(v * du)

rigid smelt
#

Uyep

#

Basically just copy the whole expression that you crossed out above down

#

The thing you crossed out was correct

next hatch
#

okay yep

#

now that integral looks a bit wack

#

for me at least

#

do i split it?

#

or wait

#

would the x cancel one of the x's on top

rigid smelt
#

Yes

next hatch
#

so 2/3 x ^1/2

#

it would become

#

and 3/2 x^3

#

and then i integrate that

rigid smelt
#

Firstly v=2/3 * x^(3/2) - 6/4 * x^(4)

next hatch
#

yes

rigid smelt
#

And secondly 1/2 + 1 is not 3

next hatch
#

idk if im just writing out retardedly

#

i meant

rigid smelt
#

I dont know how you came from 1/2 to 3 tbh

next hatch
#

2/3 x ^3/2

#

becomes the same but ^1/2

#

this is before integration

#

and the 3/2 x ^4

#

becomes 3/2 x ^3

rigid smelt
#

Oh ok this clears up more

#

Because i have absolutely no clue what you were writing

next hatch
#

lmao sorry im mathematically illiterate

rigid smelt
#

Anyway to sum up, if you have integral 2/3 * x^(1/2) - 3/2 * x^3 dx then you are heading in the right direction

#

No its just that i cant read minds

#

So it probably would help if you write out the full work

next hatch
rigid smelt
#

Yeah looks good

next hatch
#

so that'd be the final answer

#

or do i have to do anything else

rigid smelt
#

+C

next hatch
#

fuck

#

every fucking time

#

god damnit this stupid + C

rigid smelt
#

Welp everyones nightmare

next hatch
#

in high school we were told we can ignore it since the questions told us to find AN integral which could omit the C

#

now in uni thats fucking us in the ass

rigid smelt
#

🤷‍♂️

next hatch
#

oh well is what it is

#

thanks for the help

#

just one more thing

next hatch
rigid smelt
#

Standard as in?

next hatch
#

like standard integrals

#

uh

#

already existing

#

like the standard triangles

#

for trig

#

but for integrals

rigid smelt
#

I guess its in those forms(???)

#

For d you might have to manipulate using a bit of algebra

#

But yeah, those integrals are fairly common

next hatch
#

okay bet

#

and e ill ask another time lmao that looks nightmareish

#

thanks again for ur help

arctic delta
#

integral related, how do i go about solving this

vale wigeon
#

differentiate both sides

arctic delta
#

is that from a rule?

vale wigeon
#

what?

#

sorry, do you think there's some kind of Book Of Correct Courses Of Action that lists the one and only proper procedure one must engage in when solving any math problem?

arctic delta
#

no lol, like a law or rule stating for general blanket stuff y know

placid zinc
#

See the first fundamental theorem of calculus, to see that derivatives can "undo" integrals

vale wigeon
#

no there is no rule

#

i should probably have suggested that you differentiate both sides and see what happens

frail shard
wary badge
#

:sus:

cinder finch
surreal sphinx
#

what is the GCF of 4m^3 and 6m^6

tidal turtle
dark granite
agile ruin
#

How the angles $\theta$ and $\alpha$ on the plane got equal to angles on the circle?

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

the dashed line is also tanget

#

@agile ruin

next hatch
#

how do i go about doing d?

#

i've completed the square to get (x-3)^2 + 13

#

but thats it

rigid smelt
#

try factoring the denominator and do fraction decomposition

next hatch
#

wdym

vale wigeon
#

partial fractions

#

that's what waler is suggesting

next hatch
#

like 1/(x-3)^2 * 1/13

#

no wait

#

no i cant do that

vale wigeon
#

wat

next hatch
#

i was thinking of the multiplication thingo

#

nah that dont work

#

let me have a look at my notes

#

okay so i need to split it into (x-3)(x-3) + 13

#

but what do i do with that 13, its the bit thats confusing me

rigid smelt
#

you have to factor x^2 -6x + 22

#

(x-3)^2 + 13 is not factored

next hatch
#

one sec

#

how do i factor it

rigid smelt
#

tho wait nvm its not factorable

next hatch
#

yeah i was gonna say

#

thats why i completed the square

rigid smelt
#

completing the square wont help, i suppose something to do with ibp?

#

and then u-sub probably

alpine sable
#

i suggest two methods

#

either integrate it's infinite series

#

or differentiate under the integral sign

rigid smelt
#

oh wait, bruh how didnt i see it

#

yeah completing the square

#

and then trig sub

next hatch
#

wdym trig sub

rigid smelt
#

using the identity tan^2(x) + 1=sec^2(x)

#

you have (x-3)^2 + 22

#

looks fairly similar doesnt it?

next hatch
#

somewhat

rigid smelt
#

yeah so try to apply it

next hatch
#

would rearranging to get 1 on its own work?

#

and then put it on the numerator?

rigid smelt
#

well in a way, you can see the identity as 22tan^2(u) + 22=22sec^2(x)

#

so you just have to try to make 22tan^2(u) appear

#

the only way is, like i have mentioned, trig sub

#

or u-sub but people dont like to call it that and just wants a different name

#

if you are stuck ||substitute x-3=sqrt(22)tan(u)||

next hatch
#

so u = (x-3)?

rigid smelt
#

no not quite

#

we want tan^2(u) and not just u

#

very close

next hatch
#

(x-3)^2 = tan(u)^2

rigid smelt
#

yes every closer

next hatch
#

so arctan(x-3) = u

rigid smelt
#

but now we want to have 13tan^2(u) appear

#

so it should be sqrt(13)tan(u)=x-3

#

oh wait, its +13

#

nvm

next hatch
#

so replace all 22's with 13

#

bet

rigid smelt
#

yeah

next hatch
#

so (x-3)^2 = 13tan(u)^2

rigid smelt
#

no, (x-3)^2 = 13tan^2(u)

#

or x-3=sqrt(13)tan(u)

next hatch
#

and multiply everything by 13

#

yes

rigid smelt
#

?

next hatch
#

sorry i was typing without seeing the message

#

so the whole identity

#

multiplied by 13

#

to give us the +13

rigid smelt
#

yeah

#

anyway, find du and just substitute

next hatch
#

so where does the u come from

rigid smelt
#

yes it is

#

?

#

its just a different variable?

#

it doesnt affect the identity at all

next hatch
#

oh right

rigid smelt
#

tan^2(8) + 1 =sec^2(8)

#

doesnt matter what i put in there

next hatch
#

okay yeah gotcha

#

sorry im just tryna understand this as much as i can

#

so 13tan^2(u) + 13 = 13sec^2(u)

rigid smelt
#

u*

#

13tan^2(u) + 13 = 13sec^2(u) because we already used x in our integral

#

now thats the substitution in the integrand, you still havent found the substitution for dx yet

next hatch
#

hm

rigid smelt
#

just go back to x-3=sqrt(13)tan(u) and find dx in terms of u and du

next hatch
#

implicit dif is needed yeah?

rigid smelt
#

yeah

next hatch
#

fuck

rigid smelt
#

its not so bad

next hatch
#

gimme a sec

rigid smelt
#

take your time

next hatch
#

wait where does the sec go

#

from the identity

alpine sable
#

wait

#

you have to put bounds on u

next hatch
#

it can't be pi/2 yeah?

#

and any factor of it

rigid smelt
#

when you substitute x-3=sqrt(13)tan(u) into the integral, you have 1/(13tan^2(u) + 13) which simplifies to 1/(13sec^2(u)) if thats what you were asking

next hatch
#

oh yeah gotcha

alpine sable
#

u can yonly be in first and third quadrant

rigid smelt
#

u is every real number except pi/2 + kpi for k in Z

alpine sable
#

no

#

you are letting (x-3)^2 = 13tanu

#

tanu can not be negative

rigid smelt
#

im not letting (x-3)^2 = 13tan(u)

alpine sable
#

oh my bad

next hatch
#

should i just disregard that or is it important

#

cuz tryna understand it is confusing me

rigid smelt
#

it is not important in this problem since you are just finding the integral

#

just find dx in terms of du and u

next hatch
#

aight mad

rigid smelt
#

what did you get?

next hatch
#

sorry im in the middle of work im a bit on and off atm

#

imma try now

#

is it possible to use y instead of u or does that fuck up stuff

#

like cuz y = f(x) sorta shit

rigid smelt
#

it is

next hatch
#

aight mad cuz dy/dx looks neater to me

rigid smelt
#

you can just use anything you like as long as its not causing trouble for others to understand your work

next hatch
#

oh okay sweet

alpine sable
#

i have a quesiton

#

question

next hatch
#

yes

alpine sable
#

how do the bounds of the substitution affect the integration

rigid smelt
#

then you probably should use a different channel

alpine sable
#

it's re;ated

#

and no need to be rude

rigid smelt
#

im not being rude

#

if you have a question which i supposed was a math problem then i asked you to move to another channel.

#

its just part of how the question channels work

next hatch
#

wait so for x-3 = sqrt(13)tan(y)

#

im a bit confused as to how to do implicit diff

#

its been like 3 weeks since i last did it

rigid smelt
#

ok so here x is a function dependent on y

#

and we will differentiate both sides with respect to y

#

so for the left side what do you have?

next hatch
#

x-3

rigid smelt
#

no i mean after the differentiation

next hatch
#

1

rigid smelt
#

not really

#

x is a function of y

next hatch
#

oh

#

wait

#

so is it dx/dy

rigid smelt
#

yes

next hatch
#

okay

rigid smelt
#

and the right side, what do you have?

next hatch
#

oh wait thats the answer lol whoops

#

i meant like dx/dy is the derivative

#

anyways

#

right side would be

#

uh

#

one moment

#

sqrt(13)sec^2(y)

rigid smelt
#

uh no

#

sqrt(13)sec^2(y)

#

or sqrt(13)/cos^2(y) if thats what you were intending to write

next hatch
#

oh wait i was thinking of the 1/cos^2(y)

#

yes

#

that

rigid smelt
#

so in summary, dx/dy = sqrt(13)sec^2(y)

#

so dx = sqrt(13)sec^2(y) dy

next hatch
#

yes that

rigid smelt
#

and i messed up

ocean sealBOT
next hatch
#

isnt that the same

rigid smelt
#

are you clear why we got this?

rigid smelt
next hatch
#

ah right

#

okay so

#

that trig identity * 13 = the sec denominator

#

and the dx is treated as a variable

rigid smelt
#

yeah

next hatch
#

which is sqrt13 sec^2(y)dy

rigid smelt
#

yes

#

so now the integral simplified down to 1/sqrt(13)

#

however the variable of integration is y

#

so be careful about that

next hatch
#

one moment

#

so the secs cancel out

#

and i get root13/13

#

how does it become 1/sqrt(13) again

#

divide by root13?

rigid smelt
#

1/sqrt(13) = sqrt(13)/13

next hatch
#

yes yes cuz with trig root2/2 = 1/root2

rigid smelt
#

i mean you can write it either way

#

doesnt matter anyway

next hatch
#

gimme a sec

#

is it just y/root13 +C

rigid smelt
#

yes

#

dont forget the constant tho

#

and then just change it back into terms of x

next hatch
#

but then what is y

rigid smelt
#

x-3=sqrt(13)tan(y)

#

solve for y

next hatch
#

ah

#

bet

#

so the final answer is arctan(x-3) + C?

rigid smelt
#

no

ocean sealBOT
rigid smelt
#

the sqrt(13) is inside the argument

next hatch
#

oh right

#

so final answer is arctan([x-3]/root13)/root13 +C

#

awesome thank you so much again waler

#

you da mvp

low topaz
#

Can there be sigma notations with decimal limits

rigid smelt
#

do you mean something like sum of 0.1 + 0.2 + 0.3 + ...?

low topaz
#

How could you calculate this

#

Would it be 0+.5+1+2+3+4

vale wigeon
#

no

#

you would just not use this notation in the first place

#

what did you attempt to write with this?

#

0 + 0.5 + 1 + 1.5 + 2 + 2.5 + 3 + 3.5 + 4 + 4.5?

#

is this what you wanted to write as a summation?

#

@low topaz

formal patrol
#

is there a simple and fast way to get the zeropoint of a function f.e. x^3-4x^2+x+6?

old fjord
#

what is spiral square root ?

low topaz
vale wigeon
#

no

low topaz
#

Ok

slim reef
#

what is maths?

shell widget
#

@alpine sable For the first, it's 3f(x) + 30

#

For the second, first a vertical stretch by 2 and then translation upwards by 3 units

#

hm, f(x) + 3/2 and then 2[f(x) + (3/2)] = 2f(x) + 3

#

yeah same

#

First a horizontal compression by a factor of 2 and then shifting the graph horizontally to the left by 4 units.

#

sec

#

Yes

#

You're right!

#

mb

silver current
#

this is a little easy but my answer isnt in the options

vale wigeon
#

what answer did you get?

silver current
#

5

vale wigeon
#

you got x=5 as the only solution, right?

silver current
#

yes

vale wigeon
#

yeah, i got the same

#

looks like the question is messed up

silver current
#

the other solution is 5/3 which would satisfy the option B

late cedar
#

Why is the denominator 5! times 6!? Shouldn't it be only 11! using the permutation formula?

silver current
#

but it doesnt satisfy x<0

vale wigeon
#

yeah x=5/3 doesnt solve your equation

#

@late cedar 11!/11! would just be 1, you know...

silver current
#

Maybe the options are wrong

late cedar
vale wigeon
#

???

late cedar
#

Im following the permutation formula

vale wigeon
#

can you show what formula you're trying to follow here

#

i'm pretty sure either it doesn't apply or you're not following it properly

late cedar
#

but I am substituting the numerator with the total number of books

#

and the denominator as 6-5

vale wigeon
#

n=11 in your case

late cedar
#

yes

vale wigeon
#

but then you say you put 6-5 in the denom

#

how did 11 suddenly transform into 6

#

(also nPr isn't even appropriate to use here)

late cedar
#

oh ok

#

i get it now

silver current
#

is |(-4)^(1/2)| a pssible number

#

is it imaginary

vale wigeon
#

if you allow yourself to work with complex numbers then yes it is a thing that makes sense

#

no it's not imaginary

#

$|2i| = 2$

ocean sealBOT
silver current
#

it doesnt say x belongs to R+

vale wigeon
#

........what's up with these questions that have no correct answers

#

there is only one real solution here

silver current
#

2 actually

#

+- 2

vale wigeon
#

-2 doesn't work

#

-2 * |-2| = -2 * 2 = -4

silver current
#

oh right

#

fu

vale wigeon
#

can i see the entire homework assignment

#

the fact that not one but two questions ended up without correct answer options is kinda concerning

silver current
vale wigeon
#

do any of these allow picking multiple answers?

silver current
#

only the first one

vale wigeon
#

right

silver current
#

or if instructed

alpine sable
#

A table of size n rows and n columns will be filled with the number 1 or –1
so that the product of all the numbers in each row and the product of all
the numbers in each column are – 1. How many different ways to
fill in the table?

#

stuck at this

#

I even do not have any idea for this question

sudden kayak
#

Can someone please help me with this assignment

carmine lion
#

yo wtf

idle rune
#

does "D (or P)" alphabet have angles?

frozen shale
#

Hi, what are my options for online Bayesian inference? I'm trying to update a posterior $P(\theta \mid y_{t+1}) = \frac{P(y_{t+1}\mid \theta) P(\theta \mid Y_{t})}{\sum_{\theta} P(y_{t+1}\mid \theta) P(\theta \mid Y_{t})}$ on observing a new datapoint $y_{t+1}$

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
cobalt coyote
#

Did anyone ever come across this formula. If so, can you explain what is the name of formula and where was it used. Thank you

spark zenith
#

Help him

#

Idk how to help

alpine sable
#

Bruh.

spark zenith
#

Wtf is ur problem

spark zenith
alpine sable
sly mantle
#

@spark zenith do not use the mod ping like this

cobalt coyote
#

Thank you for ping for moderators to help

sly mantle
#

the mod ping isn't for hw help

spark zenith
#

Ow

spark zenith
sly mantle
#

@alpine sable knock it off with these comments

Do it yourself, it's ezz.
I only help girls.

cobalt coyote
spark zenith
cobalt coyote
#

Yes I understood..

vale wigeon
#

this doesn't look like any particularly well-known formula

#

what do you need it for?

cobalt coyote
vale wigeon
#

???

cobalt coyote
#

That was the final mathematical formula I got from my friend, but can't figure out where it was used

vale wigeon
#

then ask your friend maybe??

#

or share the coding problem here

cobalt coyote
#

Can I share coding problem here as it was a maths questions here?

vale wigeon
#

i literally just told you to share it

#

coding problems are ok here in general

cobalt coyote
#

Yes.

#
#include <stdio.h>

int foo(int x,int y, int q)
{
    if ((x<=0) && (y <= 0)) 
        return q;
    if (x <=0)
        return foo(x, y-q, q);
    if (y <= 0)
        return foo(x-q, y, q);
    return foo(x, y-q, q) + foo(x-q, y, q);
}

int main()
{
    int r = foo(15,15,10);
    printf("%d", r);
    return 0;
}```
#

This was the problem

vale wigeon
#

so your question is why this code represents the formula you gave earlier?

vale wigeon
#

(three backticks for a code block btw)

#

hm

#

well your friend's formula only works when q > 0

#

also the program goes into an infinite loop if q = 0

cobalt coyote
#

yes of course q>0 granted

vale wigeon
#

okay

#

i can kind of see it, i think

cobalt coyote
#

It will always be some multiple of q for any two random integers x,y. That's for sure

vale wigeon
#

then it looks like your friend's formula is not quite right

#

and it should instead be q times what she wrote

cobalt coyote
#

Yes sorry there should be q

#

I forgot to say

vale wigeon
#

so if x and y are both nonpositive we get q

cobalt coyote
#

yes , take x,y as both positive and also q too

vale wigeon
#

...you said before that q is always positive...

cobalt coyote
#

all are postive there are no contravarsies here

vale wigeon
#

anyway, it looks like f(x,y,q) = q even if x is positive and y is not (or vice versa)

cobalt coyote
#

Yes, but take x,y,q as postive

vale wigeon
#

i'm getting there

cobalt coyote
#

This is the most general form

vale wigeon
#

patience

cobalt coyote
#

yes

vale wigeon
#

okay so let's fix q and imagine the input space of f as an infinite two-dimensional grid

#

like a coordinate plane but we're only considering points with integer coordinates

cobalt coyote
#

haa sure

#

x,y as two dimesional coordinates

#

in flat space

vale wigeon
#

it looks like the recursive definition of f implies that it'll be constant on certain q by q squares within this grid

#

for example if x and y are both between 1 and q (inclusive) we'll have f(x,y,q) = 2q

#

because its recursive definition always refers to its values at points q units to the left and q units below

cobalt coyote
#

in between

cobalt coyote
#

it's also recursive function

vale wigeon
#

what i'm saying is

#

we can partition the positive integers into ranges, each of length q

#

1 to q, q+1 to 2q, 2q+1 to 3q, etc

cobalt coyote
#

Haa i agree

vale wigeon
#

the value of f(x,y,q) only depends on which ranges x and y fall into

cobalt coyote
#

Yes surely that's correct

vale wigeon
#

this explains the ceil(x/q) and ceil(y/q) in the formula

cobalt coyote
#

Haa yes

#

So that's reverse engineering formula

vale wigeon
#

the values of f within each range form a sort of rotated pascal triangle

cobalt coyote
#

you just said right

vale wigeon
#

i didn't reverse engineer the formula no

cobalt coyote
#

Sorry i got confused but your explanation i can get it

cobalt coyote
#

Actually we have divided the whole coordinate system of x,y as 1 to q, q+1 to 2q, 2q+1 to 3q

#

such that x and y values take in this range.

#

nice divison of this coordinated system

alpine sable
#

Hi guys

#

Can anyone solve this?

#

Point O is the center of a circle around triangle ABC, with BOC 120 ° and AOB 140 ° as shown. Find ABC in degrees?

finite scroll
#

well they are all radii

#

and isosceles triangles

#

20+30

#

so 50 right

#

@alpine sable

cobalt coyote
alpine sable
finite scroll
#

np

cobalt coyote
opal gulch
#

hello friends

cobalt coyote
#

Actually for q=3 I have written the diagram as follows

finite scroll
#

does everyone have phds here

cobalt coyote
#

No I'm student not phd

#

Hey dosto please explain me if anyone are familiar with the given formula.

#

Where did you see this formula in your learning any ideas

#

There will be a multiplication Factor of q

#

In the formula

#

Both x,y,q are positive integers

gentle ocean
#

For this geometric sequence, is it possible to solve it using log?

finite scroll
#

but at a basic level

gentle ocean
#

😭

finite scroll
#

hold on

#

is that sadler?

#

the textbook

ocean sealBOT
#

This may only be done by a moderator!

gentle ocean
#

Nelson

finite scroll
gentle ocean
#

yea

finite scroll
gentle ocean
#

i just get confused :<

finite scroll
#

don't you use this

#

that's what we've been using

gentle ocean
#

yes

#

yos

finite scroll
#

1/128=8(-1/2)^(n-1)

#

you need log tho

gentle socket
#

yes

gentle ocean
#

but im finding value of n

finite scroll
#

to solve

gentle ocean
#

yes

#

but when i did it

#

i have log as negative

finite scroll
#

i'm sorry i haven't leant about log yet so i cant help

gentle ocean
#

log(-0.5)

#

which is undefined

#

so i got confused

#

sequences and series is confusing a bit

finite scroll
sage canopy
cursive frost
#

What does the apostrophe mean?

#

Everything else is straightforward with union and intersects if sets

sage canopy
wary stream
#

You are taking a test?

hearty quail
#

tsk tsk tsk

wary stream
#

What exactly don’t you understand?

sage canopy
#

Hope u understood this solution @alpine sable

#

Its alr

#

Lol

#

No worries

wary stream
#

The goal is to assist the person, not finish their work

sage canopy
#

Ok

cinder finch
#

Don’t assist the person by doing 100% of the work; that just terminates the intent the work had towards the student. Another alternative for assisting people with work could include explaining them the concept?

alpine sable
#

:0 what your opinion

wary stream
#

What value of a makes the expression not possible

alpine sable
wary stream
#

For more details, what value can the denominator not be?

alpine sable
wary stream
#

If the denominator equals 0, math breaks

#

Does that help a bit more?

alpine sable
cinder finch
#

Can someone explain this to me?

wary stream
#

Isn't that least squares method?

cinder finch
#

It’s actually linear regression

wary stream
cinder finch
gray crag
#

when im drawing the angle in standard position for the unit circle, is the triangle a 45 45 90 or 30 60 90

wary stream
#

Depends on how you want to draw it

gray crag
#

when is it 30 60 90 and when is it 45 45 90

gray isle
#

depends on the values in your question

gray crag
gray isle
#

it should be clear if you can convert radians to degrees

fierce frigate
#

HELP THE B ONE

#

T-T

#

IM OS CONFUSED RN

tribal wasp
#

Are you familiar with sine rule?

gray isle
#

Sine rule isn't needed

versed light
#

Is anyone Indian here

tribal wasp
#

Yeah it isn't. Just realised.

versed light
#

Nvm wrong channel

gray isle
#

start by drawing the line segment AB

#

use a protractor to measure the respective angles and draw rays

tribal wasp
#

Wait which part of the qtn are you having trouble with @fierce frigate ? The area or sketching

gray isle
#

their intersection will be the third point of your triangle

fierce frigate
#

area

#

and sketching

#

but

#

i already found someone

#

but i neede help

#

in A

#

nvm

#

no

#

no need

#

thx

alpine sable
#

Hi, does anyone know a website/tool for solving sequences and series and detecting what kind it is(arithmetic,geometric,fibonacci etc)
I currently use "Atozmath number series calculator", but its flooded with ads/a bit to slow for my liking.

If anyone knows a website please let me know! 🙂

#

Atozmath solution example

gray isle
#

wolfram

alpine sable
#

I have tried wolfram before and I get no solution pretty often. Am I using the wrong one?

jolly stone
#

for very general cases it's better to just manually find it

wispy olive
#

Is this channel free?

alpine sable
jolly stone
#

wolframalpha helps you with arithmetic and geometric sequence, but probably not some variations of fibonacci sequence like your example

alpine sable
#

Alrighty

gray isle
#

you could try oeis

jolly stone
#

tried OEIS for that example and didnt work also, and OEIS only keeps most important sequences

wispy olive
#

How do we multiply and/or divide a number like 2 * √6 or 4*√7 by another number?

jolly stone
#

so general cases like that won't work

alpine sable
#

can somebody help me on how to integrate this one?

#

ln = natural log

alpine sable
bronze pelican
#

What is a modulus function

alpine sable
bronze pelican
#

That's just a fact

alpine sable
bronze pelican
#

|x|=?

bronze pelican
alpine sable
alpine sable
bronze pelican
alpine sable
#

I didn't understand that like give example?

junior vigil
#

@alpine sable it gives the 'magnitude of a number', especially useful for complex numbers

#

distance from the origin

#

0

alpine sable
#

Yeah ^

junior vigil
#

@bronze pelican you were asking ye

bronze pelican
bronze pelican
alpine sable
bronze pelican
junior vigil
#

think about the set of all 2 numbers that add to 4 that are positive

#

i.e. 2+2

#

3+1

#

1+3

#

anything inside the | | becomes positive

alpine sable
alpine sable
unborn sleet
#

HI guys, I have a dumb question, on my book it's written that this expression, c^2-2c+1-25f^2 has no common factors other than 1 and -1, I get the 1 but why also -1

stray prism
#

is there a way to simply this?
-6x^4 + 3x^3 - 6x^2

#

I think there would be some solution to make it a single N x^n +- ....

gray isle
#

wdym by make it a single N

stray prism
#

like number

alpine sable
stray prism
#

k

alpine sable
#

@alpine sable

alpine sable
silver current
gray isle
silver current
alpine sable
#

Is there an easier way to do this other than just listing them all out

warm carbon
#

Hey all I have a quick question. I'm starting Indefinite integrals, but my algebra skills are a little lacking. How do handle an integral with x in the denominator?

warm carbon
upbeat helm
#

Could I get some explanation on how to do it? Don't tell me the answer pls

gray isle
#

Apply inscribed angle theorems

fluid moth
#

first time posting here - can we ask questions on statistics, calc, and linear algebra? is this kind of an all purpose discord for anything related to maths? im starting my masters and i will definitely be coming to this channel