#help-0
1 messages · Page 767 of 1
Just solve for the normal force
Which would be perpendicular to the wall
@fickle dew
Not sure I'm quite following, so I get the Ff from m . g then ÷ it by the u (dont have the character) to get the Fn?
mg is your force of gravity
Denoted by F_g here
μ is the coefficient of friction
But this would be correct
Just need to plug in numbers
I see I see, thank you!
no clue how to solve it
i was thinking, what if i calculate the area of the triangle (everything above h)
then i subtract
eeeeeh not sure tbh
Hint
Actually I should have drawn the orange line in a different place oof
Do try to use the radius tho
i think they want me to solve it in another way
Finding the area would be a lot harder tho
no i think your way is the way
mb
hmmmmm
im just gonna pray i dont get this question during exam
best way to solve it tbh

lol
question
you have a cup of coffee at temperature 70 C and you immediately pour in 1 part milk to 5 parts coffee. The milk is initially at temperature 1 C. Write the differential equation that governs the temperature of the coffee
Some things to consider:
The milk will heat up and the coffee will cool down until they are the same temperature
The coffee will 'win' because there's more of it, meaning that the final temperature would be closer to 70 than 1
Are you given heat capacities?
I must have Done something wrong with the last calculation
can someone look at it?
Why do you think it's wrong?
Seems like it makes sense with your input and output though
Why did you do Sum xy and Sum x^2 though
Don't you need these formulae?
I have a #discrete-math question
how can inclusive or be used in such a way where p, q, and r, are statements like 'we will be using this coding language in the class', 'we will be using that coding language in the class', and 'we will be using the other coding language in the class'? I am supposed to write a sentence for (p and q) or r, with those statements. but i dont see how it could be inclusive or rather than exclusive
Inclusive or, usually given the symbol V, means "take option 1, option 2, or both options"
Hello ! How are you ?
Truth table explains all:
p q p V q
0 0 0
1 0 1
0 1 1
1 1 1
For me, those statements seem to imply you are using all 3 in the same class?
I've lots of difficult in English. Can we speak a little French please ?
0 and 0 -> 1
1 and 0 -> 0
1 and 1 -> 1
0 and 1 -> 1
@bleak basalt
Did I help make it more clear? It's not all too clear what you're asking
I've lots of difficult in English. Can we speak a little French please ?
I'm level A2 in English CECRL
With Google translate
I understand the difference between or and xor, i just dont understand how OR could possibly be applied to this specific situation
(p and q) or r?
Can you help me ?
since the scenario, for example, is something like "we will be using either a combination of java and C, or python". But in that example, the or is exclusive
@bleak basalt
@placid zinc Can you speak French ?
i dont understand your question really. Im supposed to formulate a sentence for p and q, inclusive or r
and my problem is i can only think of sentences for the given values of p, q, and r, in which the or is exclusive
p XOR q = (q or p) and (p' or q')
Where ' means complement, or NOT
Is one way to express it
but I mean i need to come up with an actual english sentence that would make the expression true
I have no idea what you're asking
okay so lets say p is soup, and q is salad. My assignment question is "write a sentence for which s is true in the expression s=p^q". The correct answer for this question would be "i will give you both soup and salad"
"I will give you soup or salad, but not both"
@sullen bobcat le salon est déjà occupé, pose ta question dans #help-5 jvais voir si jpeux aider ou au moins traduire
yes, and now I am trying to do something similar to the example that I have just given, except it is for the p, q, and r values, and expression that I mentioned above. Does that make sense?
We may be using a combination of Java and C, but if we don't, we will be using Python instead
okay and that wouldnt be exclusive? because if we use python instead, doesnt that mean its only python and the combination is excluded?
That's a good idea, "only Python" to make it more clear
First do chain rule:
1/(xe^x) times d/dx(xe^x)
but its supposed to be inclusive, not exclusive
I got (1+x)e^x / xe^x
big brain way is simplify that expression first
log(xe^x) = log(x)+log(e^x) = log(x)+x
[assuming log is base e]
Ohhhh
I just realised lmao
theyre both equivalent haha
not a multiplication of each other
thanks guys!

had the same story with my calc professor lol, gave a whole page to find derivative of (x^-3+x^-2)/(x^-1). people did shittons of work with product rule and such, and then me and my friend did this in 2 lines
I need help clarify something for me. The square root property is when you got x^2=9 u get x=squareroot9 or x=-squareroot9 but the thing is, ive seen some people put parentheses on minus x=(-)squareroot9, what does that mean? is it to define that it's positive only?
not sure what specific context that is, but when x^2 = 9 -> x = -3 or 3
but when if you want to find sqrt(9), it is defined as the only positive value sqrt(9) = 3
so if someone said -sqrt(9) it means -3
the parenthesis thing i've never seen it before
Same here, but they do it in a way of x=+-sqrt(9) and put the parantheses on the minus
for an example, the length of a side is never negative
i think thats why?
did you see that on the geometry problem or just anything in general
but it's fallacy still, square of two negative and positive yield positive anyway. but if we are saying that a pythagorean theorem u have c^2=a^2+b^2 and if u square root, u never get negative one
cuz it's just weird to write out negative
yeah exactly
i mean, it's true if x = -3, x^2 = 9
but if x is a side length, x can never be -3 anyways
it can but its not practical. lets say one side is negative and another is negative depends where u put your origo xD yield then positive area 😄
but the question is, what is the name called that u put the parantheses on the minus? i dont find any website or books yet that show the definition and explanation
Why is it that a/b*b/a = 1 no matter what?
Because the numerators and denominators cancel out and make 1
$$\frac{a}{b}\times \frac{b}{a}$$
dldh06
Can I have an example?
$$\frac{4}{6}\times \frac{6}{4} = \frac{4 \cdot 6}{6 \cdot 4}$$
dldh06
The 6 in the numerator and denominator cancels to be 1, and same with the 4
you can prove this using the mathematical principle of induction
Go on.
I thought of this, but it didn't really "click", at least the inner workings of it.
$$ test $$
shira ツ
To do this I just need to change x and y to 1?
$$ f(1,1) = ln(x + y - 1) $$
shira ツ
Yea
sorry to bug you, but what do you mean by this?
https://gyazo.com/f18f565715fc1ca27e9098a5b5de1bbf find a and b
when something is notated as (g o f)(x) is that the same as g(f(x))
when two inscribed angles intercept the same chord, the y have the same measure
anyone know what happened here
i know you sub in 2-x for u and stuff like that
but am unsure how to fit u into the other terms like x-1
can you simplify that to the point where a 8th grader can understand
what don't you understand in what i just said
don't you know what is a chord
like a striaght line
it is a segment that joins two points of a circle
so here's the first part of that question
plugging everything in, F is equal to 28.936
@surreal sphinx Rearrange it so that the nonvariables are together and all the variables are with the same variable.
2 · 3x³x⁵.
Then multiply the different groups together.
2 · 3 = 6
x³x⁵ = x⁸
6x⁸.
Chai T. Rex
Hello can anyone help me with this question ?
<@&286206848099549185>
need help with wheer to start
Ik this a dumb question but i forgot, would (6 2/7 * 6 2/7) + (196 * 98) be the association property of addition or multiplication?
Pls someone answer lol
there are 2 steps to prove unique existence, existence & uniqueness. to show existence, we must show there exists a definition of addition & multiplication on F satisfying the above conditions. to show uniqueness, we must show that if there exist two pairs of definitions of addition & multiplication on F satisfying the above conditions, let's call em +/* & [+]/[*], then +=[+] & *=[*] (the equality here means equality of functions since addition & multiplication are formally functions FxF->F)
Could someone pls quickly answer my question
neither, it's just an expression
the associative property of addition is a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c
the associative property of multiplication is a * (b * c) = (a * b) * c
Ty very much
unit circle
Just curious, why is the integral of a square wave a triangular wave? Since integration is the area, shouldn't the triangular wave start with a step? (the area under the square wave starts with a number larger than 0)
The square wave has constant values
So when you integrate it you get the linear increases and decreases of the the triangular wave
You could also go backwards and imagine what the derivative of the triangular wave would be
@tranquil sierra
is there precal tutors or something? I'm new to this whole discord tutoring thing
I can't figure out how that is the correct answer
I obviously am missing a big portion of trig
Since I wasn't making trig functions negative when they needed to be
It was because one of the given values was negative
How did I get this wrong?
$Pop_{\text{in 4 years time}} = 3425 - ((3425 \times 0.03) \times 4)$
HappyAlt
Should equal 3014
Isn't supposed to be an exponential function?
I don't understand how to work with that
Given here, (-3.5, 6.8)
You did everything correctly, you just forgot to account for that negative value that was given
am i not supposed to work with an obtuse angle?
also wouldn't -6.8^2 + 3.5^2 = 58.49
where did 5849 come from
https://gyazo.com/e4de5e9ec620da92410f384633a3014e i missed out on some classes about analytic geometry can someone give me some hints or explain the process
I don't know what to do with the "x+" and "1-". How to solve it? I'm stuck with those two things, but I don't know how to proceed, I know the answer but don't know how to solve the question! I need to simplify the fraction! Thanks for the help!
<@&286206848099549185>
$\frac {x+ \frac {y-x}{1+xy}}{1 - \frac {xy - x^{2}}{1+xy}} = \frac {\frac {(y-x) + x(1+xy)}{1+xy}}{\frac {1(1+xy) - (xy - x^{2})}{1+xy}}$
HELLOBELLO
Thanks!!
np
Hey so I have a number that get's multiplied by 0.25, for example 100, which is 75. How can I find out by how much I need to multiply 100 in the first place so that value - 75 = 100, the same number?
yea i know.. it's hard for me to explain
I need to provide a formula
like
if I multiply 100 by 1.25 (add 25%) and then by 0.75 (substract 25%) I get 93.75
And I need to get back to 100 again
In the first step I need to multiply by something that gets me to 133 which is the value that after 25% (1.25) gets me to 100
But I don't know how to find it as a formula
93.75x = 100
x = 100/93.75
right.. and multiply by 1.25 and then that by 100
You're very unclear. Can you list out, like with steps, what exactly you are doing to this number?
And what you are trying to have the number match?
you already solved my issue
Okay! Great haha
there was a family
they ate garlic bread every day
3 of them in total, two parents and an only child
they where in bliss
but then
another gremlin child was born
now 4 people ate garlic bread
what fraction of garlic bread did each of the original three lose
depends on how much garlic bread the new child eats in relation to the parents and the first child
and whether or not the total amount of garlic bread eaten by the family has changed with the birth of the new child
no
they all eat the same amount of garlic bread
an equal amount
and the amount of garlic bread is the same
I think I know the answer but I might be wrong
and what do you think the answer is?
1/3 = 33.3333333333
1/4 = 25
33.3333333-25 = 8.33333333
100/8.33333 = 12
12 3
-
===> -
100 25
I think they all lost three twenty fifths
Imagine there's 12 loaves of garlic bread every day. How many each did the 3 eat? How many each do the 4 eat now?
oh no
but if you carry the 44 around the three it equals the answer
yep makes sense
how do i do b?
im a bit confused
seems like integration by parts but i tried it and it doesnt work
You can solve 1st by substituting 2x^4+16=t
ive done the first part
am i starting about this right?
its b im confused on
sorry boss question's already being asked
ive tried doing ln(x) = du/dx and the other one being v(x)
and vice versa
and both scenarios have lead me to weird integrals
Split the integral
wdym
Take log with x^1/2 , and other ,then try to apply the integration by parts
👍
rewrite (x^{\frac{1}{2}}-6x^3) as (\dfrac{x^{\frac{3}{2}}-6x^4}{x}), then (u=\ln(x)), there you go
SubGui
im still confused with that
i tried that
You just have to integrate (...) as a whole
it gave me some fucko answer
Can you show your work?
i kinda crossed it out lol
Sigh
If you had
(x^(1/2)-6x^3)/x -
integral of (3/2 * x^(3/2) - 3/2 * x^4)/x dx
Then thats correct
so the x^1/2 part is the derivative
No
Uh no, (x^(1/2) - 6x^3) is dv
Then yeah
If you make no mistakes then you are on your way
And by the seem of it
You were doing good
The integral after the ibp is not very hard
Oh nvm, you messed up your uv
but the integral vdu is good
this is right yeah?
Yes
okay
Your work was almost correct
and to find v(x) i integrate dv(x)/dx
this is confusing me now
cuz if ln is u
Again, dv=ln(x)
then wouldnt the equation be ln x * v(x)
What equation?
didnt u say it was u
We dotn have any equation
^
No no, u=ln(x)
Its just me having a stroke
Yeah nvmyour work is good
Continue with the integral
Yes
so then its uv - integral(v * du)
Uyep
Basically just copy the whole expression that you crossed out above down
The thing you crossed out was correct
okay yep
now that integral looks a bit wack
for me at least
do i split it?
or wait
would the x cancel one of the x's on top
Yes
Firstly v=2/3 * x^(3/2) - 6/4 * x^(4)
yes
And secondly 1/2 + 1 is not 3
I dont know how you came from 1/2 to 3 tbh
2/3 x ^3/2
becomes the same but ^1/2
this is before integration
and the 3/2 x ^4
becomes 3/2 x ^3
lmao sorry im mathematically illiterate
Anyway to sum up, if you have integral 2/3 * x^(1/2) - 3/2 * x^3 dx then you are heading in the right direction
No its just that i cant read minds
So it probably would help if you write out the full work
Yeah looks good
+C
Welp everyones nightmare
in high school we were told we can ignore it since the questions told us to find AN integral which could omit the C
now in uni thats fucking us in the ass
🤷♂️
with parts c and d its standard integrals yeah?
Standard as in?
like standard integrals
uh
already existing
like the standard triangles
for trig
but for integrals
I guess its in those forms(???)
For d you might have to manipulate using a bit of algebra
But yeah, those integrals are fairly common
okay bet
and e ill ask another time lmao that looks nightmareish
thanks again for ur help
integral related, how do i go about solving this
differentiate both sides
is that from a rule?
what?
sorry, do you think there's some kind of Book Of Correct Courses Of Action that lists the one and only proper procedure one must engage in when solving any math problem?
no lol, like a law or rule stating for general blanket stuff y know
See the first fundamental theorem of calculus, to see that derivatives can "undo" integrals
no there is no rule
i should probably have suggested that you differentiate both sides and see what happens
:sus:

what is the GCF of 4m^3 and 6m^6
well, determine gcd(4,6) and determine gcd(m^3,m^6) and then figure out what you need to do with those answers to get gcd(4m^3,6m^6).
How the angles $\theta$ and $\alpha$ on the plane got equal to angles on the circle?
Bkas
the inclined plane is tangent to the circle so the radius is perpendicular to the plane
the dashed line is also tanget
@agile ruin
Thanks
how do i go about doing d?
i've completed the square to get (x-3)^2 + 13
but thats it
try factoring the denominator and do fraction decomposition
wdym
wat
i was thinking of the multiplication thingo
nah that dont work
let me have a look at my notes
okay so i need to split it into (x-3)(x-3) + 13
but what do i do with that 13, its the bit thats confusing me
tho wait nvm its not factorable
completing the square wont help, i suppose something to do with ibp?
and then u-sub probably
i suggest two methods
either integrate it's infinite series
or differentiate under the integral sign
wdym trig sub
using the identity tan^2(x) + 1=sec^2(x)
you have (x-3)^2 + 22
looks fairly similar doesnt it?
somewhat
yeah so try to apply it
well in a way, you can see the identity as 22tan^2(u) + 22=22sec^2(x)
so you just have to try to make 22tan^2(u) appear
the only way is, like i have mentioned, trig sub
or u-sub but people dont like to call it that and just wants a different name
if you are stuck ||substitute x-3=sqrt(22)tan(u)||
so u = (x-3)?
(x-3)^2 = tan(u)^2
yes every closer
so arctan(x-3) = u
but now we want to have 13tan^2(u) appear
so it should be sqrt(13)tan(u)=x-3
oh wait, its +13
nvm
yeah
so (x-3)^2 = 13tan(u)^2
?
sorry i was typing without seeing the message
so the whole identity
multiplied by 13
to give us the +13
but isnt the identity this
so where does the u come from
oh right
okay yeah gotcha
sorry im just tryna understand this as much as i can
so 13tan^2(u) + 13 = 13sec^2(u)
u*
13tan^2(u) + 13 = 13sec^2(u) because we already used x in our integral
now thats the substitution in the integrand, you still havent found the substitution for dx yet
hm
just go back to x-3=sqrt(13)tan(u) and find dx in terms of u and du
implicit dif is needed yeah?
yeah
fuck
its not so bad
gimme a sec
take your time
when you substitute x-3=sqrt(13)tan(u) into the integral, you have 1/(13tan^2(u) + 13) which simplifies to 1/(13sec^2(u)) if thats what you were asking
oh yeah gotcha
u can yonly be in first and third quadrant
u is every real number except pi/2 + kpi for k in Z
im not letting (x-3)^2 = 13tan(u)
oh my bad
should i just disregard that or is it important
cuz tryna understand it is confusing me
it is not important in this problem since you are just finding the integral
just find dx in terms of du and u
aight mad
what did you get?
sorry im in the middle of work im a bit on and off atm
imma try now
is it possible to use y instead of u or does that fuck up stuff
like cuz y = f(x) sorta shit
it is
aight mad cuz dy/dx looks neater to me
you can just use anything you like as long as its not causing trouble for others to understand your work
oh okay sweet
yes
how do the bounds of the substitution affect the integration
then you probably should use a different channel
im not being rude
if you have a question which i supposed was a math problem then i asked you to move to another channel.
its just part of how the question channels work
wait so for x-3 = sqrt(13)tan(y)
im a bit confused as to how to do implicit diff
its been like 3 weeks since i last did it
ok so here x is a function dependent on y
and we will differentiate both sides with respect to y
so for the left side what do you have?
x-3
no i mean after the differentiation
1
yes
okay
and the right side, what do you have?
oh wait thats the answer lol whoops
i meant like dx/dy is the derivative
anyways
right side would be
uh
one moment
sqrt(13)sec^2(y)
uh no
sqrt(13)sec^2(y)
or sqrt(13)/cos^2(y) if thats what you were intending to write
yes that
and i messed up
waler
isnt that the same
are you clear why we got this?
no, i was missing the 13 in the denominator
ah right
okay so
that trig identity * 13 = the sec denominator
and the dx is treated as a variable
yeah
which is sqrt13 sec^2(y)dy
yes
so now the integral simplified down to 1/sqrt(13)
however the variable of integration is y
so be careful about that
one moment
so the secs cancel out
and i get root13/13
how does it become 1/sqrt(13) again
divide by root13?
1/sqrt(13) = sqrt(13)/13
yes yes cuz with trig root2/2 = 1/root2
but then what is y
no
waler
the sqrt(13) is inside the argument
oh right
so final answer is arctan([x-3]/root13)/root13 +C
awesome thank you so much again waler
you da mvp
Can there be sigma notations with decimal limits
do you mean something like sum of 0.1 + 0.2 + 0.3 + ...?
no
you would just not use this notation in the first place
what did you attempt to write with this?
0 + 0.5 + 1 + 1.5 + 2 + 2.5 + 3 + 3.5 + 4 + 4.5?
is this what you wanted to write as a summation?
@low topaz
is there a simple and fast way to get the zeropoint of a function f.e. x^3-4x^2+x+6?
what is spiral square root ?
No. Im wondering if the upper limit could be a number In the Decibels.
no
Ok
what is maths?
@alpine sable For the first, it's 3f(x) + 30
For the second, first a vertical stretch by 2 and then translation upwards by 3 units
hm, f(x) + 3/2 and then 2[f(x) + (3/2)] = 2f(x) + 3
yeah same
First a horizontal compression by a factor of 2 and then shifting the graph horizontally to the left by 4 units.
sec
Yes
You're right!
mb
this is a little easy but my answer isnt in the options
what answer did you get?
5
you got x=5 as the only solution, right?
yes
the other solution is 5/3 which would satisfy the option B
Why is the denominator 5! times 6!? Shouldn't it be only 11! using the permutation formula?
but it doesnt satisfy x<0
yeah x=5/3 doesnt solve your equation
@late cedar 11!/11! would just be 1, you know...
Maybe the options are wrong
yes but it would be (6-5)! therefore the answer should be 11! only?
???
Im following the permutation formula
can you show what formula you're trying to follow here
i'm pretty sure either it doesn't apply or you're not following it properly
but I am substituting the numerator with the total number of books
and the denominator as 6-5
n=11 in your case
yes
but then you say you put 6-5 in the denom
how did 11 suddenly transform into 6
(also nPr isn't even appropriate to use here)
if you allow yourself to work with complex numbers then yes it is a thing that makes sense
no it's not imaginary
$|2i| = 2$
Ann
........what's up with these questions that have no correct answers
there is only one real solution here
can i see the entire homework assignment
the fact that not one but two questions ended up without correct answer options is kinda concerning
do any of these allow picking multiple answers?
only the first one
right
or if instructed
A table of size n rows and n columns will be filled with the number 1 or –1
so that the product of all the numbers in each row and the product of all
the numbers in each column are – 1. How many different ways to
fill in the table?
stuck at this
I even do not have any idea for this question
assignment?????????//
yo wtf
does "D (or P)" alphabet have angles?
Hi, what are my options for online Bayesian inference? I'm trying to update a posterior $P(\theta \mid y_{t+1}) = \frac{P(y_{t+1}\mid \theta) P(\theta \mid Y_{t})}{\sum_{\theta} P(y_{t+1}\mid \theta) P(\theta \mid Y_{t})}$ on observing a new datapoint $y_{t+1}$
jowlz
All?
Did anyone ever come across this formula. If so, can you explain what is the name of formula and where was it used. Thank you
Bruh.
Wtf is ur problem
<@&268886789983436800> help him idk how to help him
I already mentioned it.
@spark zenith do not use the mod ping like this
Thank you for ping for moderators to help
Ok
the mod ping isn't for hw help
Ow
I saw your msg
@alpine sable knock it off with these comments
Do it yourself, it's ezz.
I only help girls.
Please help me anyone with this one.
Its not allowed for help

Yes I understood..
It's actually a coding problem, hence for that coding problem I want to find a mathematical notion to solve in general
???
That was the final mathematical formula I got from my friend, but can't figure out where it was used
Can I share coding problem here as it was a maths questions here?
Yes.
#include <stdio.h>
int foo(int x,int y, int q)
{
if ((x<=0) && (y <= 0))
return q;
if (x <=0)
return foo(x, y-q, q);
if (y <= 0)
return foo(x-q, y, q);
return foo(x, y-q, q) + foo(x-q, y, q);
}
int main()
{
int r = foo(15,15,10);
printf("%d", r);
return 0;
}```
This was the problem
so your question is why this code represents the formula you gave earlier?
Exactly
(three backticks for a code block btw)
hm
well your friend's formula only works when q > 0
also the program goes into an infinite loop if q = 0
yes of course q>0 granted
It will always be some multiple of q for any two random integers x,y. That's for sure
then it looks like your friend's formula is not quite right
and it should instead be q times what she wrote
so if x and y are both nonpositive we get q
yes , take x,y as both positive and also q too
...you said before that q is always positive...
all are postive there are no contravarsies here
anyway, it looks like f(x,y,q) = q even if x is positive and y is not (or vice versa)
Yes, but take x,y,q as postive
i'm getting there
This is the most general form
patience
yes
okay so let's fix q and imagine the input space of f as an infinite two-dimensional grid
like a coordinate plane but we're only considering points with integer coordinates
it looks like the recursive definition of f implies that it'll be constant on certain q by q squares within this grid
for example if x and y are both between 1 and q (inclusive) we'll have f(x,y,q) = 2q
because its recursive definition always refers to its values at points q units to the left and q units below
I understood the answer is always 2q
in between
What is the point here i didn't get it
it's also recursive function
what i'm saying is
we can partition the positive integers into ranges, each of length q
1 to q, q+1 to 2q, 2q+1 to 3q, etc
Haa i agree
the value of f(x,y,q) only depends on which ranges x and y fall into
Yes surely that's correct
this explains the ceil(x/q) and ceil(y/q) in the formula
the values of f within each range form a sort of rotated pascal triangle
you just said right
i didn't reverse engineer the formula no
Sorry i got confused but your explanation i can get it
pascal triangle
Actually we have divided the whole coordinate system of x,y as 1 to q, q+1 to 2q, 2q+1 to 3q
such that x and y values take in this range.
nice divison of this coordinated system
Hi guys
Can anyone solve this?
Point O is the center of a circle around triangle ABC, with BOC 120 ° and AOB 140 ° as shown. Find ABC in degrees?
well they are all radii
and isosceles triangles
20+30
so 50 right
@alpine sable
Could you please explain what you said I'm not getting
Thank you!
np
Can you draw the diagram and explain what you were saying
hello friends
Actually for q=3 I have written the diagram as follows
No I'm student not phd
Hey dosto please explain me if anyone are familiar with the given formula.
Where did you see this formula in your learning any ideas
There will be a multiplication Factor of q
In the formula
Both x,y,q are positive integers
For this geometric sequence, is it possible to solve it using log?
bro im doign this stuff rn
but at a basic level
😭
This may only be done by a moderator!
Nelson
ah
yea
this seems hard tho
i just get confused :<
yes
but im finding value of n
to solve
i'm sorry i haven't leant about log yet so i cant help
log(-0.5)
which is undefined
so i got confused
sequences and series is confusing a bit
i agree
The sequence is formed by just multiplying (-1/2)
There is no need to complicate it by using log
What does the apostrophe mean?
Everything else is straightforward with union and intersects if sets
So just write the eqn. 8*(-1/2)^x=1/128 and solve this eqn
U will get x=10
You are taking a test?
tsk tsk tsk
Compliment or negation
What exactly don’t you understand?
Oh ic
Don't do people's work for them
The goal is to assist the person, not finish their work
Ok
Don’t assist the person by doing 100% of the work; that just terminates the intent the work had towards the student. Another alternative for assisting people with work could include explaining them the concept?
:0 what your opinion
No, it's based on the denominator
What value of a makes the expression not possible
Ok
:0 okey
For more details, what value can the denominator not be?
Ok, thank you, the truth is, I don't know much about math, but thanks.
I think I understand something, thank you
Can someone explain this to me?
Isn't that least squares method?
It’s actually linear regression
Yeah, least squares regression
Yeah
when im drawing the angle in standard position for the unit circle, is the triangle a 45 45 90 or 30 60 90
Depends on how you want to draw it
when is it 30 60 90 and when is it 45 45 90
depends on the values in your question
it should be clear if you can convert radians to degrees
Sine rule isn't needed
Is anyone Indian here
Yeah it isn't. Just realised.
Nvm wrong channel
start by drawing the line segment AB
use a protractor to measure the respective angles and draw rays
Wait which part of the qtn are you having trouble with @fierce frigate ? The area or sketching
their intersection will be the third point of your triangle
area
and sketching
but
i already found someone
but i neede help
in A
nvm
no
no need
thx
Hi, does anyone know a website/tool for solving sequences and series and detecting what kind it is(arithmetic,geometric,fibonacci etc)
I currently use "Atozmath number series calculator", but its flooded with ads/a bit to slow for my liking.
If anyone knows a website please let me know! 🙂
Atozmath solution example
wolfram
I have tried wolfram before and I get no solution pretty often. Am I using the wrong one?
for very general cases it's better to just manually find it
Is this channel free?
Yeah for these ones it is. But I also need to use it for bigger problems and more difficult numbers which are really time consuming to do by hand
wolframalpha helps you with arithmetic and geometric sequence, but probably not some variations of fibonacci sequence like your example
Alrighty
you could try oeis
tried OEIS for that example and didnt work also, and OEIS only keeps most important sequences
How do we multiply and/or divide a number like 2 * √6 or 4*√7 by another number?
so general cases like that won't work
For example 2√6 * 4√7 is 2 * 4 * √6 * √7 =
8 * √42
2√6 / 4√7. = √6 / 2√7
A function with Range ≥ 0
It doesn't give any -ve value like
|x| = √x²
|x|=?
Ik but it's still just a basic
Wym?
still looking for help?
Like it doesn't help too much in solving tough questions
@alpine sable it gives the 'magnitude of a number', especially useful for complex numbers
distance from the origin
0
Yeah ^
@bronze pelican you were asking ye
|x+4|-|x|=4 , find the value of x
nope
Graph it or solve seperately by splitting domain
do it ik the process
think about the set of all 2 numbers that add to 4 that are positive
i.e. 2+2
3+1
1+3
anything inside the | | becomes positive
yeah I have to check if that series is convergent, I integrated by parts but what I'm getting doesnt seem to be convergent
1st) For x+4 > 0 and x<0
i.e. -4<x<0
Its x+4+x = 4
x = 0
2nd) For x+4<0
-(x+4) x = 4
Doesn't satisfies for any x < -4
3rd) For x > 0
(x+4) - x = 4
Satisfies for all x>0
So answer combined is
x≥0
HI guys, I have a dumb question, on my book it's written that this expression, c^2-2c+1-25f^2 has no common factors other than 1 and -1, I get the 1 but why also -1
is there a way to simply this?
-6x^4 + 3x^3 - 6x^2
I think there would be some solution to make it a single N x^n +- ....
wdym by make it a single N
like number
hey i kinda... did it maybe.. sending u the pic in 5..
k
can you post in an unoccupied channel and tag me there with your work?
@alpine sable
check ur dm
your question is still very unclear
help
Is there an easier way to do this other than just listing them all out
Hey all I have a quick question. I'm starting Indefinite integrals, but my algebra skills are a little lacking. How do handle an integral with x in the denominator?
no
Nvm found it. it's the natural log
Could I get some explanation on how to do it? Don't tell me the answer pls
Apply inscribed angle theorems
first time posting here - can we ask questions on statistics, calc, and linear algebra? is this kind of an all purpose discord for anything related to maths? im starting my masters and i will definitely be coming to this channel
