#help-0
1 messages Ā· Page 626 of 1
I think you have already derived the general equation for simple harmonic motion
in your course
and all you need to do is show that sin(theta) approximation to theta is accurate in this case
after that they have already established the equation of motion
and they just use the equation of motion for SHM
so you should technically be allowed to use the formulae for motion and time period etc.
oh okay
how would that work for #2 though
because i did that for #1 i just used the shm equation
i got 38, could you check if that makes sense
sorry im asking for so much help and thank you so much youre really patient
approximation gives 39
oh
yeah its like 38.98
i just said 38 because i floored it
since it doesnt click the 39th time
oh wait that actually makes more sense
yeah I am really tired today lol
that is correct yes
hahaha youre fine thank you so much for helping
sooo for #2
i just say
theta'' = -(g/0.6) theta
does that make sense or should i do something with it
it does make sense
oh okay so thats it for my answer?
it is correct
but I think they are expecting
a normal equation
not a differential equation
like in your workbook
they do the same work
equation for motion would be something that describes theta as a parameter of t
so for every t you would know theta
Hello everyone. Im having trouble with my Ti 84 plus calculator. I am doing normal distributions (idk how its called in English hopefully thats correct) and when I go to the NormalCDF thing it gives me the screen as in box number 2. I would want it to show me box number 1, because there it says what information to put where, while in box 2 I have to know the right order. How do I go from box 2 to box 1? Any ideas?
ah okay
the differential equation just does not take initial condition into consideration
so like the equation we came up with earlier?
@dawn epoch channel busy
yeah but avoid all that mess
oh
Do i have to go somewhere else?
how so?
try any of the other questions channels ig
there are 9 channels find 1 that is not busy
the way they did it in your workbook
Oh okay i didnt know every channel was for one thing sorry guys
they just proved sin(theta)=theta for 0<theta<15
yeah
i have no clue how they got this or what it means though
Heyo everyone! i have a exam in Two days, and can use my notes on part two. My exam has geogebra, excel, geometry, algebra etc..
So my question is:
What is most important for me to note down as i can use during my exam?
where can u get help from this server ?
any of the questions channels which aren't busy
or any of the topic channels
you know the arbitrary constants we had in our solution?
oh any of u busy?
we're working on smth in this channel so yes
ight
so the phase shift due to those arbitrary constants is arctan(c2/c1)
which is E(symbol for pound) in their expression
and the amplitude due to these arbitrary constants would be sqrt(c2^2+c1^2)
which is theta(naught) in their case
ah okay
they probably did all that we did
already
as a proof for simple harmonic motion
in your class or as an assignment maybe
they didnt
this is the only assignment on this topic
and the thing i sent is the only material we were given on it
weird considering this is differential equation and not introductory mechanics course
anyway that is how we get that equation of motion
we actually got it so hopefully that helps you in understanding it
now according to the workbook you have to use this result I think
it does for the most part, i just dont know what the vertical and phase shifts are
idk what you're referring to with vertical but phase shift is just the change in input for sinusoidal function so for R-method/Auxillary angle method we get Asin(Wt)+Bcos(Wt)=Csin(Wt+D) A, B and C are amplitude(if this is what you mean by vertical) and D is the phase shift for the resultant sinuosoid from the given sinusoids this is also called auxillary angle
yeah i meant amplitude sorry
yeah
since it corresponds to maximum displacement/angle in SHm we call it amplitude
i just didnt know how that correlated to what i had
you do now?
yeah
thats the r method you were talking aobut right
thats how we get the values from the constants in my old equation with cos and sine
hmm
yes
im gonna try to find out what they mean by motion equation
in the other parts of the textbook
but i dont really have a clue
they just mean equation of this form x=Asin(wt+P)
which is the result you get from differential equation
but you have to find the values of A and P
using the given condition
oh
i asked the class discord whether we're supposed to actually solve for it and i got that š
so i guess i just leave it in that format
what he probably means is
you don't need to solve the differential equation
which we did earlier
using the characteristic equation
instead use the result Asin(wt+P)
they have actually given the definition of w
but since we actually solved the differential equation
remember we had 4.(something) in our solution?
to find A and P as I said
but i dont know what the meaning of itis
w is angular velocity usually right
what is it in this case
mathematically
it means nothing
but in physics
there is something called standard circle
since sinusoids are projections on circle
we represent the variable point of displacement of a point as the projection of a different variable point that goes in a circle
and the angular velocity of this different point
is w
oh ok so it is angular velocity?
yes?
x=Asin(wt+P)
I will give you the steps
I think that would make it clear for you
can you post the problem again?
I will use your workbook as reference
y''=-(G/L) sin(y) you can write this right?
now sin(y) ~ y for 0<y<15
yeah
y''=(-G/L)y
this is the standard differential equation form of Simple harmonic motion so we get general solution
y=Asin(sqrt(G/L)t+P)
now it is given initially it is at y=0.1
0.1=Asin(P)
and it is also given that it is at rest
so y' = Asqrt(G/L)cos(sqrt(G/L)t+P)
which gives us
similarly we get 0=Asqrt(G/L)cos(P)
A cannot be 0 since that would imply y=0 for every t which is not possible
therefore P = pi/2
0.1=A
replacing these in our equation
we get y=Acos(sqrt(G/L)t)
I only found that
Theta(t) = Acos w+B sin w
How come it become the actual theta(t)? Did they have some experimental constants??
this is the equation of motion
adding pi/2 makes sine into cosine right
and id replace the A with 0.1
you use R-method to convert this to a single sinusoid and the corresponding constants are irrelevant from physics point of view so they just name it accordingly but still 2 constants that we don't know about so nothing changes
yes
and yes
So am i still almost right?? Coz i just only using characteristic formula that i learned recently
Ahhh i see.....soo they using some kind of trigonometric characteristics to convert the equation to become like that??
yeah
Can I put a question in here or r yāall still talking
maximum angular speed is when theta=0 right
we're still talking :/ sorry
Ok itās fine
so then i'd plug in 0 for theta and find what the time is then? then plug in time into y'?
you don't reaally need to do that
you have the actual function
just take y'
and for sinusoid function the maximum is amplitude
ohhh
okay
so would it be 0.408
and are the units radians/second?
im so confused
gravity is like linear right
so its not 10
how would i even convert that
maximum angular velocity is AW , A was 0.1 radians
w was sqrt(g/l)
yeah 0.408
radians/sec
thanks
how would that work though?
because the gravity
its 10 m/s^2
but thats linear
and this is rotational
sorry im asking so many questions
yh
makes sense
thank you so much!
i have a bunch more tbh
but like
i took up way too much of your time already š
if it is the same thing I won't be helping you but if it is something different I can help
you should actually re try these because if you can't do these you learned nothing from our interaction
how did you get 0.253
yeah I am asking about the actual calculations
like what did you put in the calcullator
i solved the equation for L, so since T = 2pi sqrt(L/g), L = (1/2pi)^2 g
if g is 10 m/s^2 then L is just 0.253 meters
yeah that is correct
thanks
lemme do #8 really quick
ok for 8
i got 0.80 * sqrt(1/0.37) = 1.315 seconds
Quick question what's easier to use here horizontal or vertical strips?
thanks š
<@&286206848099549185>
friends i have a big question!!
how to factor x^9 + 3x^6 + 2x^3 + 1?
the answer im supposed to get is at the top, and i know the internet says to factor by grouping but it makes no sense and seems so arbitrary
dont ping helpers right away, and they both work
,w x^9 + 3x^6 + 2x^3 + 1
huh
i dont think it factors
it does
,rotate
did you type it right
huh
itās typed and written right
,w factor x^9 + 3x^6 + 2x^3 + 1
ah there we go
but why does it factor like that
,w x^3+3x^2+2x+1
nah thats wrong lmao
x^3= u
this here is right but how do we get there
i have no idea how they hand factored that, using wolfram seems like the move here
itās for my brothers math test tomorrowš„²
,w factor x^3+3x^2+2x+1
rip
cardano's method>?
what level of math is this?
ive done a lot of math and ive never learned something that can factor that without guess and check
thats like the cubic version of the quadratic equation right
heās in 7th grade LOL
its reducing cubic to quadratic
are you sure you have to factor it to solve the problem
We didnāt even factor till 10th grade lol
there is probably a typo
yeah that does not look right
do people know how to do this off the top of their head?
its really long and convoluted
but i had it memorized at some point
its gross though
there is generalized thing with coefficients
I don't know how to do this off the top of my head I always just look it up
but you probably can remember the substitution
Either way I donāt think a grade 7 would know that
all you need is to convert your cubic to x^3+px+q=0
heās a smart kid, heās in an advanced school
oh no i remember this now
unless hes like some type of prodigy
wait care to elaborate
heās big brain thatās for sure :D
so it should be like basic factoring
fancy guess and check
but in this case
someone tryna help me in question-1
I am pretty sure its some basic property
related with binomial (a+b)^3
there is probably a typo
no way they expect cardano's method lol
i hope it was a typo bc my dad and i couldnāt figure it out and my brother is stressed for his test now, it was a question on the review packet
was it like a bonus
well if it makes you feel better a bunch of probably math majors cant do it without wolfram
the substitutions A and tan(phi) are all you need
because i guess if you had a couple of hours you could sit down and do it
no clue i didnāt ask
guessing and checking š
i doubt itās a several hour long test itās prob smth like 40-60 min
yeah it was just supposed to get the thing wolfram got
that was the answer on the packet
but i j donāt know how to get that
again google said factor by grouping but i never learned that
i dont see how youd do that by grouping
I think we are misunderstanding what facorization means
they don't want linear factors
just any polynomial*polynomial
yes^^
yes
its a cubic times a degree 6
also
wait nvm we're not done w this
ill put it in a different channle
I don't understand what the objective of doing this is
wait nyann
u want a polynomial * a polynomial
can you help me with a laplace transform
i mean i guess but those are basically all guessing too
sorry i keep asking for help but it makes a lot of sense when you explin it
I have not really learned Laplace transform
ah i was wondering where they got them from
i figured out what to do as far as getting it into integral form
its doable if you sit down and guess well but if this is a factorization someone knows off the top of their head if be super surprised
idk what the purpose of this problem for his brother was ? like what does this even teach for an advanced class?
how to learn esoteric factoring methods appearently
like $x^9+3x^6+x^3+3$ is something id expect on a test like that
bunny
not whatever that is
does anyone know what g + b and r * 47 and B / R?
am i supposed to know what those letters mean
@alpine sable delete your question from other channels
hi
$x^9+3x^6+x^3+3$ is
jplink
thats an actual factor by grouping problem
absolutely no idea, you cant describe that graph with a single number
its easy
You know what it means to solve it numerically?
oh okay
yeah both x and y
And equation means y+mx+b right?
y=mx+b but yes
yeah
"this is a line with slope ... that crosses the y axis at ..."
hi is it okay if i can ask my question?
yeah tell
sure, i think coconut is done
Yep
uh itās this problem right here
@tepid cargo cute skin
what? which?
itās taking very long to send sorry
i tried different ways to solve for angle BAC but i keep on getting it wrong.
my friend told me she got 60 for BAC but i did it and i got like a whole different number
Hey
So did you find angle BAC same way as you did for others
i tried to
whats the formula for curved surface area of a cone?
but i ended up with like 100
So I think what answer did you get by finding that way would represent angle subtended at the center
ohhhh
So like 3x =60 gives you angle at the center
Are you getting what I am trying to say?
wait but isnāt 60 the measure of arc AF
Look I am not sure but I strongly feel that this is what happening
i got 260š°
Now you know the property
That angle made at center
Is double of what made
By the same arc
so is it 4x + 6x = 360??
At any other point at the circle
No no what you have calculated for x is absolutely correct
X= 20 is right
Can I dm u?
yes !!
Ok
Hi. Someone asked me for help with solving this problem, except they haven't learned at all about the pythagorean theorem, nor about squareroot being the inverse function of exponent2 (^2). Is there a way to solve this without those concepts?
I am completely lost of any way to solve this without those concepts.
@alpine sable Can you go to another channel please
@wild bay Split it into figure then find there area and aff
What's aff and what does it mean to split it into figure
Sorry add
Yeah but actually try it, can you split into known-length figures without pythagorean theorem a^2 + b^2 = c^2
Yeah by Pythagorus therom you find third side then area then go for other triangle draw perpendicular from 7in side on 20in
I'm saying, can you solve this problem without using pythagorus theorem
No wait I will show how to do
Okay
probably but pythag makes it easier
But how could it have been given to a student who didn't learn pythag
@wild bay is the answer 179
To the whole area of the shape?
240 - 16 + 12*9/2 so
224 + 54
so 278
So no not 179
And yes I know pythagorus but the person who had this problem given to them didn't
is the 20 the entire bottom side or just the part its under?
I took it to be the entire bottom side
It's pretty ambiguous, not that the other possibility would make it any more solvable without pythag
Then how did you find the area
,w 0.5912+1112-1/24*8
Yeah I got its same before it was some calculation mistake so I got 179 now it's 170
Yes without Pythagorus it's not easy
i mean I guess you could use law of sines/cosines and trig as well but that seems a tad overkill
For that you need to know angles which are not given
you can use trig to get them tho
its easy enough to get the angle across from 12in, then you can go from there
but lets be real if you dont know pythag thm you dont know law of sines or trig
The blue area you find with pythag. It's 3 times the pythag identity 3 4 5, so the shortest side is 9. area of triangle is base times height over 2, so 9 * 12 / 2 = 54.
the big rectangle is 20 - 9, which is 11 (or maybe it's 20, ambiguous) times the height which is 12. So 11*12 = 132. minus the green area, aka 20 - 9 - 7, aka 4, times base which is 12-4 so 8, divided by 2. That makes the green triangle be area 16. So 54 + 132 - 16 = 170, or 278 with the 20 being the bottom side of the rectangle and not the whole thing. I am stupid.
@ionic jewel yeah understood by using it also we can find 3rd side
Yeah if they don't know pythag they prolly never heard of trig
@wild bay I understood
depends on what 20 in is, but sinde it's in the middle of the rectangle, it's probably not for the entire side tbh
Which means it's 20 - 7
the simple answer is teach them pythag or at least the 3 4 5 triangle
since not using it is just trolling at this point
Can I type here
They didn't want to, I'll try again
@edgy zealot yes
Thanks
Thanks though guys this confirms my like thoughts
tell them the alternative choice is not being able to answer the question
that he really had to learn pythag
this is a pythagorean question, and you have ot learn it
Yeah okay
Iām kind of new here so I donāt know how to use texit but
That image really didn't come out okay. I'll type it up if it's too hard to read
You should be able to find it if you know that the angle of CAD is half Arc AD
@tight locust what's the function
The fuel consumption of a car in miles per gallon is modelled by $F(s) = 6\exp(\frac{s}{20} - \frac{s^2}{2400})$, where s is the speed of the car in miles per gallon (mpg).
EndTimes
@tight locust let me try
If the car is travelling at 50 mph and its speed is changing at the rate of 20 mph/hour, what is the rate at which its fuel consumption is changing?
S is speed
@edgy zealot Your taking up 2 questions....
Whatever, can someone help me with a math project? I'd rlly appreciate it.
I just need help choosing the measurements.
Im a bit confused to what this means.
Its a lot different compared to the homeworks.
I'm creating my own figures, but they have to make sense.
Just found out D means space diagonal
d prob means diameter?
How to calculate square root š
do you know what are perfect squares ?? @fair cove
can someone help?
learn them first
So, I got a number sequence, 4, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14... What is the next number in the sequence?
This is my solution.
Is my approach correct?
i dont have enough timee
bruh -___-
u cant understand sq rooots without that concept
okay but what is that
its like abcd for english
Guys?
search google
o ok
the best part about sequences is you can say anything is right
I guess it really depends on the answer sheet of the teacher, right?
Mine is explainable tho.
I'm not sure with the 0 on the middle term of the sequence if that is acceptable.
oeis has both 15 and 16 as possible continuations
i mean yours is explainable, not sure if that logic would match the teachers sheet tho
in fact I'd argue it's wrong becuase you are going to have a very hard time continuing past that point
I guess you're right. But other than my method, I am not sure about its pattern tho.
Numbers that are not the product of consecutive primes
Like I said there's no way to know, and you can justify anything. The quote above follows your sequence but is probably not right.
Can someone please help me with these 2
delete to go to an unoccupied channel
Okay
there's nothing obvious that stands out to me, so yours is probably as good as anything else, but it doesn't strike me as "the right" solution
Hold on, I think I got an alternative approach. But welp, it's late to change my answer from a finished exam. I'm just reviewing it for the best.
that is an awful question
someone put that on an exam?
unless there's more context that's purely a terrible question
your approach seems fine then, you should argue for your points if you don't get them*
- if there's no other context
Is dividing by 9 the same as multiplying by 0.11?
no
Yeah, it was part of an exam.
1/9 is not equal to .11
And sorry about the delayed answer. My PC keeps crashing.
well your exam is poorly written
sad
well "finish the sequence" questions like that are terrible
It is. It has given me a hard time figuring out the sequence. But still, it was a fun experience.
Now, this might be the alternative approach to it. Idk if it's what the teacher's answer sheet looks like:
that's an equally valid solution
Yeah. Eh, it's just 1 wrong mistake if that's the case...
but you could also just day "it's the sequence of "4,8,9,10,12,14, whatever you want" repeated forever
you can contrive an example for any number than follows
19 is not more correct than anything else
no
that's even dumber
-3,0,1,0,3
what kind of pattern is that?
your soln actually made some sense
Lol. Idk tho. I'm just figuring out, unless I extend more to see what's going on deep.
it's a terrible question, you better not lose points on it
Yeah, no use. Unless it's in the deeper... -3, 1, -1, 3,...
Yeah, I'll make sure for it. Idk if the teacher sees it or not. The annwers he inputed are only the basis, so this means that the site checks it and not actually the teacher himself.
I also did with this problem. It's very fun tho:
-1,-1,-2,-3, what is this the Fibonacci sequence?
@leaden ferry this series is the combination of 2 or more series....take the series 1 , 3 , 4 , 7 , 11 , 18 and observe that they hv Fibonacci differences
haha we both see the Fibonacci
xD
Yes. Yes. Also, I already saw your message but got distracted on this channel for my approach showcase. lol.
oki np
I'm sorry for not replying back. š¦
juss want to point it out
aww shucks no matter u guys in this server are the only ones who respond lmao
lol
Just behaving with proper etiquette as said in the rules... because it's an academic server. :"D
you would be surprised how many people ignore that
F. I know. It's the nature of social medias, specially for Discord being depicted in the public as a "gaming chat community."
But otherwise, now, it is for basically every general use.
Schools, studies, interests, movies... you named it.
Aight. Gotta go. I got some titration quiz for ANALAnalytical Chemistry later. It was fun to discuss with you. :"D
get the inverse laplace of $F(s) = \frac{1}{s^2} \frac{s-1}{s+1}$
William Brown
is 36 DNE or positive infinity? if neither, then what is it? also, is 33 also DNE?
36 is +ā because it goes all the way up and will keep going all the way up
33 is like -3.2 or something
because it's defined at x=14
no because it has an arrow
if it has an arrow it will keep going in that direction indefinitely
if there is just a point at the end of the line then it just stops
i see what youāre saying, what i was thinking was that since the limit is for x approaching infinity, it would stop at the rightmost line
that one^
right at 14
so therefore it wouldnāt be able to go forward after that
but that's as x approaches positive infinity
in #36 it is asking about negative infinity
lol
infinity with the negative after
gmod
so yeah just make sure to read the question carefully
Hello. How am i suppose to represent the relation with words?
Either direct or inverse
In this case it is inverse because as x increases, y decreases
if both increased or both decreased it would be direct
Oh, so basically I'm suppose to describe the trend in the graph right
yes
Ok, thank you for the help.
no problem :)
wait for 33 is it still -3.5 even though the graph stops @elfin snow ?
sorry to ask again
@noble needle what we have to find in first
in the first one, isolate x first, Asrar
So we have to find equation in x
@noble needle you know partial differentiation
@noble needle the second question is linear differential equation
Can anyone provide me the solutions
Little bit
@noble needle I'd know what to do in first but I can provide second solution
Ok
In the first one you need to solve for the value of x
We have to just find value of x
Ya
Strawberry
Thnx
i got the same
3^x+4^x+5^x-6^x=0, how do i find the roots without graphing it
@noble needle sorry second one is bit long taking time
$3^x+4^x+5^x-6^x=0$
What
4 is 2^2
wait dude im thinkng
how can u take that lol
Lol
@normal lance it's not possible
RHS Power = LHS power
lol its not possible lmao
oh naw
@normal lance yes it's not possible
@normal lance if they were in multiplication then we could take common power not in addition
I know
Consider 3x5^x as compared to 6^x.
6^x will be greater than 3*5^x for x>=7 .
Since 3*5^x > 5^x + 4^x +3^x, we know there must be solution for 3^x+4^x+5^x = 6^x between 0,7.
Hey yup
Do some trial and error
$(2^x)^2 -2^x.3^x +5^x+3^x=0$
@hidden horizon but we want exact value
seems to be quadratic in 2^x
6^x = LHS
lol do trial and error with x between 0 and 7
@sand pine but wbu 5^x
lets say its the c in quadratic equation maybe
lol i did trial and error and for only 3 this works
$3^x+4^x+5^x-6^x=0$
Mad dron Matrix
$3^x+4^x+5^x-6^x=0$
is this correct?
how wud u simplify it
yeah, real question
$3^x+2^2x+5^x-2^x.3^x=0$
Mad dron Matrix
yeah, that's exactly what i rendered before
It's wrong
wait a min
@normal lance x should be in power
$2^2x?$
bruh wut
$2^2^x$
You put the value of x as 1,2,3 and see
no, it has only 1 root
no
Consider 3x5^x as compared to 6^x.
6^x will be greater than 3*5^x for x>=7 .
Since 3*5^x > 5^x + 4^x +3^x, we know there must be solution for 3^x+4^x+5^x = 6^x between 0,7. After some hit & trials you can further narrow it down. In this case solution is x=3
square root of 2340 in decimals
pls help
<@&286206848099549185> can anyone of you help in this
ohh
,w square root of 2340
np
,w cube root of 69
LOL!
,w cube 23
thnx
lmao
,w compound intrest on 10,800 for 3 years at 12 1/2% per annum compounded annually
:/
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
nice
lol bot wont tell ans to everything lmao
lel
do it urself lmao
i already did it, just checking my answers
oh okay
ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
can someone help me ? do you know how to solve this?
do you know what the m and b are supposed to be?
not the numerical value, just what they mean
ye the slope im i right?
m is the slope, b is the y intercept
Slope is rise/run, or the change in y divided by the change in x
so whats the change in y between the two points
and then whats the change in x between the two points?
u can use two point slope form
thats what we are doing with extra steps
oHHH okayy tysm

Let x and y be any real numbers such that x-y=10 and xy=-24. What is the exact value of x+y?
can someone help me w this
square x-y=10
just use substitution
isolate either x or y in the first equation, then plug it into the second one
thats what i did
does this even work
but i get 2 answers
yes
we will get x^2 + y^2 = 148
v know dat (x+y)^2 = x^2 + y^2 + 2xy
substitute values and boom
does he need to square it though
anyways hell get same answer
$2^2x5^x = \cbrt{400}$?
āamonov
why are choices b and c the same
either way I can go through this
first letter can be either X or Y, 2 choices
second letter can be anything, 26 choices
third letter is the other of X or Y, 1 choice
second letter can be anything, 26 choices
what is a dot product good for
its B?
B and C are literally the same answer
find the angle between two vectors, which can extend to other applications such as projections, or checking if things are orthogonal
is the right answer B?
B and C are literally the same answer how am I supposed to know which one it is
$26^2\cdot2$ is correct but i dont know which answer choice they want
bunny
yep, thanks. teacher should have shown how it integrates with cosine law earlier
anyone know?
theres probably some formula
let me look it up
Chord length is $2\sqrt{r^2-d^2}$ where r is the radius, and d is the distance from the center of the chord to the center of the circle
@strong moat
bunny
do i plug is 16 and 24 to r and d?
whats the d?
RECTANGLES
A. Sides -4
B. Angles - 90° or 4
C. Diagonals - 2
RHOMBUS
A. Sides - 4
B. Angles - 90° or 4
C. Diagonals -2
SQUARE
A. Sides - 4
B. Angles - 90° or 4
C. Diagonals - 2
is this right??
a rhombus is not all 90 degree angles
what have you done
im lost bruh
plug and chug
i plugg in x^2-1 to where
oh
our Task:
What are the different properties of each special parallelograms?
Provide your answer using the template below:
THE PROPERTIES OF SPECIAL PARALLELOGRAMS
RECTANGLES
A. Sides -
B. Angles -
C. Diagonals -
RHOMBUS
A. Sides -
B. Angles -
C. Diagonals -
SQUARE
A. Sides -
B. Angles -
C. Diagonals -
im not really sure
whats f(x)?
no
basic function notation
yeah
x^2-1?
thats your x?
yes
(3-a)^2-1
ohh
Find the area of a square if its perimeter is 52 cm.
Select one:
-121 cm2
-169 cm2
-144 cm2
-196 cm2
can you really just cancel the squares like this?
i mean, it's doing something like saying
x^2 + a = x^2 + 2x + b
the x^2 can be subtracted from both sides
yeah but in $(u_{123}^2) + (v_{123}^2) = 2uv*cos\theta$, if you wanna get rid of the squares you have to sqrt both sides, no?
Betelguse
but that's not what it's doing
Hello, please can someone tell me what is difference between radicle and square root?
sqrt is second radical
Please elaborate.
you don't just have the cosine term on the right
$\sqrt{x} = \sqrt[2]{x}$
bunny
other radicals would be anything thats not a 2 there
So are they the same thing?
square root is one particular radical
shit that took a long time for me to see. i just considered right side and not considered left as well. thanks
no prob
So are radicals all different types of square root
no
there are many types of radical expressions
sqrt is one of them
you can use radical and root interchangeably
square root is the 2nd root
$\sqrt[3]{x}$ is called a cube root, and it is also a radical, but it is not a square root
bunny
but there are more roots
there's 1st root, 2nd root, 3rd, etc.
the 2nd root is one of many roots
do they have complex roots
aight
never seen these but i cant imagine the field doesnt exist
i think that's beyond the point right now
this goes in the direction of the fundamental theorem of algebra
roots are related to polynomials and lie on the complex plane
is that what you meant?
or do you meant like a complex radical? like the ith root
the latter
cuz one can certainly raise to a complex power
$\sqrt[a+bi]{n}$
bunny
that would be a companion to x^{a + bi} = n
they should never have introduced radical notation, just give me my n^(1/b)
this quite a... radical take

i cant believe youve done this
Free?
"a polynomial of even degree will always be an into function." Why? Also any examples?
Quadratic: (-x)^2=x^2
And then an odd degree function would be -x vs x
Where itās symmetric
Okay but please reason with me: The way I see the definition of into, there'll be atleast one value in the codomain that does not belong to the range.
But we say the range of quadratic polynomials is always all real numbers.
So what am I missing?
Well itās more simple really
Think of it like
If I have x and I make it negative, will I get the same y-value? If so then itās into
This is not true for all quadratics, consider a quadratic like y = x^2. Will y ever be negative?
Isn't that how we define many-one functions?
Yes but I was talking of polynomials of the form ax^2+bx+c, won't they be even degree too?
Yes
Itās just x^2 shifted down
So there will be negative y values
But not all negative y values
Ahh I understand
And for odd degree, x distinguished with -x can cover all values in its codomain, right?
Thank you!
Could someone help me with this
Plug in x and and y and see if the left and right are the same
Don't get it
That you cannot answer this question indicates a serious lack of conceptual understanding. So I will explain that instead of answering the question.
If we plug in x and y
They should be the same on both ends
If it is the same then itās true
If not then itās false
The plane consisting of a y axis and an x axis is a collection of ordered pairs (x,y) where x gives you the x coordinate and y gives you a y coordinate. When we have an equation that describes a graph on the plane, what that means is that the graph consists of all the points that satisfy the equation. For example take
y = 5x + 1.
Is the point (0,2) on the graph? That's the same as asking if (0,2) satisfies the equation. Now y = 2, but 5x+1 = 5(0)+1 = 1. So it does not satisfy the equation, so it is not on the graph.
Now consider the point (0,1). y = 1 and 5x+1 = 5(0)+1 = 1. So it does satisfy the equation, so (0,1) is on the graph.
@hybrid patio read and tell me if you don't understand and what you don't understand
Yep
To emphasize, because I didn't say so. For (0,2) we had y ā 5x+1 and for (0,1) we had y = 5x+1.
