#help-0
1 messages · Page 579 of 1
dy/dt = 0
if y = const.
@alpine sable can I have the link? 🙂
y is a function of t
yup
y is a function of t
ooooooh
I feel dumber and dumber ._.
you're trying to bite off way more than you can chew
i'm doing the equivalent of explaining quadratic equations to a preschooler who hasnt learned to multiply
if i want to divide two polynomials modulo n, do i have to work inside Z_n the whole time or will the answer be the same if i work in Z then convert at the end?
umm
im guessing, I need to finish my ODE first before taking discrete optimization?
OHHHH
this is like a skill tree in a game
I need calculus first before doing Linear Algebra/Discrete Math/ODE?
discrete optimization?
you don't need ODE for discrete optimization
linalg does not have calculus as a strict prerequisite
neither does discrete math
is there like an overview or a diagram or some sort to see how math connects with each other?
I want to learn math as if I am unlocking skills in a video game
if there is, i don't know of one that would be comprehensive
You can try websites like Brilliant, or...
The International Baccalaureate's math syllabuses, that are shaped like diagrams.
seems like they reversed n and k, mistake
I'd appreciate if someone can help me get started with this question. It's been bothering me for some time
@quartz cedar what is V?
Although it was a mistake, the solution turned out to be nice
Permutation for combinatorics
your expansions look ok,
your conclusion is wrong
hm
especially since you had:
which indicates that option d) does indeed represent the volume of a cube
yes
❤️
A: F(-4.5) - F(-9) = 10,
B: F(-7.5) - F(-9) = 8,
C: F(-4.5) - F(-6) = 10
You need to find F(-6)-F(-7.5) to solve it (equation system)
How would I solve it is my question. I did think that -7.5 to -6 should be a negative value since all others show positive?
Do A-C and you get:
-F(-9) - (-F(-6)) = 0
F(-6)-F(-9) = 0
Then substract B from what we got
F(-7.5)-F(-6) = 8
And this is what we need but the opposite sides, so the answer is -8
You could even just draw that out on the number line, if you wanted.
hmmm let me try to draw the numberline like you suggested since im not really following the calculations. I dont understand how -F(-9) - (-F(-6)) = 0
Maybe you see this now? Doing the first equation minus the second equation
would -4.5 to -9 be -10?
This is given it's 10
Oh okay hold on so i thought that we would start with the base number and travel to the -4.5 if that makes sense. Sorry I am not that good with integrals as we just started this unit.
So we would go from -9 to -4.5 and the area of that would be 10 as you listed
i guess in function form the -4.5 is represented first but it's still the same thing as listed
it's okay you just started no worries 🙂 Did you learn this ? this is what I used to interpret each integral to equation
Oh I just remembered that from an earlier section in the chapter. I didnt think of it much but now it makes more sense as I though we were reversing the order initially lol
Good. I only reversed the order once it in the last step when I got F(-7.5)-F(-6) = 8
Because we wanted to find F(-6)-F(-7.5). So after reversing it's -8
This is based on this
Yes that's when we reverse as you described
shouldn't it be as easy as getting 3 equations from the given 3 integrals containg F(-6) and F(-7.5) and then getting what they ask?
Is anyone know how to do this question :
A pregnancy test has a sensitivity of 0.97, and a specificity of 0.92. Suppose only 29% of people who take a pregnancy test are really pregnant. If a person takes the test and it says they are pregnant, what is the probability they are really pregnant?
What's sensitivity and specificity?
This is really the proof behind the hypergeometric distribution formula
But im unsure as to how, the number of ways to select the red chips, regardless of the order in which they are chosen is rPk - since they say regardless of the order, wouldn't it be rCk?
[in the third line in the Proof paragraph]
Determine the excise tax to be paid on a house that sells for $268,210 if the buyer makes a $25,000 down payment and the seller takes back a second mortgage for $50,000?
[7:56 PM]
A)$536 .42 B)$537 C)$533 D)$538
[7:57 PM]
so the answer is B but can anyone explain how you get the answer please?
amp12128 — Today at 8:34 PM
$268,500/500 = $537
this is all it says soo idk where they got 500 from
posted this yesterday anyone got any ideas?
Mate uh channel is busy tho - even tho u posted it yday
should I just post it in another chat?
Yeah
any1 know Geometric Probability
again?
well not @ u
but generally, not the first time ive said that it's busy for this q ahahah
#help-0 message <@&286206848099549185>
What exactly is the | > notation around Ψ(t)? Does that just mean it's an imaginary quantity?
@lunar relic a complex vector
ah okay
what branch of mathematics does it come from? I know up to diff eq and multivariate calculus so I'm assuming this is linear algebra?
yea linear algebra for the basics
ah okay
hilbert space is the keyword
yes
multiply top and down with sinx+cosx
you get (sinx+cosx)^2 on top
which equals to 1+sin2x
and (sinx)^2-(cosx)^2 on bottom
which is -cos2x
=sinx^2+cosx^2+2sinxcosx
=1+2sinxcosx
=1+sin2x
nah
we get (1+sin2x)/(-cos2x)
because cosx^2-sinx^2=cos2x
but we had sinx^2-cosx^2
hence -cos2x not cos2x
hence the minus
okay, then tell me the final form you get and the differentiate
we have the same differentiate and we use the transformations i mentioned above to simplify
how do i split the variance of a matrix?
how does
$ln(\frac{2y+1}{2y-1})$
turn into
$ln(1+\frac{1}{2y}) - ln(1-\frac{1}{2y})$
log a/b
good
but that would make ln(2y+1) - ln(2y-1) right?
2y+1 / 2y
so that's ((2y+1))/2y)/((2y-1)/2y)
then you apply fraction rules
$\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{d}} = \frac{a}{b} × \frac{d}{c}$
= ad/bc
Vaara
so $\frac{2y+1}{2y} × \frac{2y}{2y-1}$
Vaara
right
right
i guess you can split them up into two logs with a +, then on the second log raise it to the power of -1 and change the symbol to - to make it do nothing
which, i guess, gets it into that form
but why would anyone think to do this? it doesn't seem like a normal rewrite of a log
well, i mean, putting it into that form seems to be the only way to move on with this question
what's the question
but i mean, i don't know why i'd be expected to realise it can be simplified like that
my initial attempt was using
$ln(1+\frac{2}{2y-1})$
you could just get to ln((1+1/2y)/(1-1/2y)) and leave it that way
reaps
but that leads nowhere
i think the idea is to use the log expansion of ln(1+x) on the two terms once you split it into two logs
which is fine, but i don't really see why i'd identify that it can be split up like that
@noble sinew isn't c separate though? why is ln of 2 part of it
say i was asked to simplify just -(ln(2x-2))/2
C is just some arbitrary constant, say we had C from line 2 there then we could just redefine the constant as D=C+log(2)/2
That is how you simplify it
Someone knows how to do this one
erm wtf does this evne mean
what is a and b supposed tobe
are they assuming its x and y
Other than that, I don't know what it means.
@barren palm the definition of a limit has a lot going on, so it's hard to answer 'what does it mean'
but individual parts can be explained fast
a & b are any real numbers where a<b presumably. (a,b) is the open interval with a & b as its endpoints
f is an arbitrary function with (a,b) as its domain and R as its codomain
also one of the lines has a typo
it should be: if $0<|x-c|<\delta$ then $|f(x)-l|<\ep$
RokabeJintaro
oh switch delta/eps ight
oh yeah i added two o
open interval ay need to check what that means again
heard it
also $f(x)\overset{x\to c}\to l$
RokabeJintaro
for any $a,b\in\bR$, the open interval with $a$ and $b$ as its endpoints is $(a,b):=\brc{x\in\bR:a<x<b}$
RokabeJintaro
oh yeah
I like to think of epsilon-delta definition of limit as some sort of game. Each time, someone gives us some epsilon to work with, and we are tasked with finding the appropriate delta such that if 0 < |x-a| < delta_i then |f(x) - L| < epsilon_i. And we will continue this on and on and on until we reach very very very small value of epsilon.
why the i index?
Someone gives us the first tolerance. Call this epsilon_1. We found appropriate delta for this, called delta_1. Now the next time someone gives us another epsilon, that same distance may not work, which would mean I would have to find a new delta. Call this delta_2. And repeat the process so on.
Which was why I used i
right yeah the text makes sense alongside khan acam vid which talks bout the game thing u on bout of satisfying it
But yea in a formal proof, just single value of delta works fine.
I have the level curve f(x,y)=k <=> -0,1·x^2-0,1·y^2+5=2,5 where k=2,5 how do I proof that this is of the type circular equation ( (x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=r^2 ) with a radius of 5?
@surreal meteor divide both sides by 0.1
hi do you guys know what 9+10 is im very confused i think its 21
its 10.9
im pretty sure its 21
then why are u asking
just to make sure 😩
well its 10.9
yo 9+10 IS 21 RIGHT
wow you really are so funny
doesn't it feel good to troll people who go out of their way to help others
peak comedy
haha
Yep I wrote that too
Haha it's danish! 😄
Exactly, why would you go on here to troll, legit people are on here to help people with their studying and this guy doesn't have better things to do 😂
Anyway, thank you my guy 😗
np
they are not the same
the one with the integral actually cares about all the values in the middle
the top one essentially draws a line from the start to endpoint and finds the slope
bottom one is actually average velocity
wait isnt the top one average velocity as well
it's poopy approximate average velocity
lol okay so the integral is specified to values in the middle? not sure i understand that fully
think about y = x^2
do the points -5, 5 for both equations
to see the difference
the integral adds up the velocity for every single infinitesimal duration of time (by definition of the integral)
dude
read the rules
danmarino900
Can someone quickly explain why the signs are wrong?
I thought since the equation for a circle is (x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2, I was supposed to pick the answer with positives?
because then when we rewrite it, we'd take the negative?
Is the set { 2·q | q is rational } equal to the set of rationals or a strict subset?
well u know that the thing inside the cos can be either pi/2, -pi/2 , 3pi/2, or -3pi/2
solve it for each of those
I sorta get what to do but my math book has like 2k + 1 as part of the equation
which idk where that comes from
solve by find every pair of x,y that makes it true?
Someone knows spanish? needing help
a point is a solution if it inside all the shaded areas
in this case if its inside both shaded areas
Its on a dor
Dot
So idk
Its like right on a sot
Dot
But its a dashed line
So im confused
its not then
your equations use greater than, not greater than or equal to
which makes the lines not part of the shaded area
you can show that it doesnt work with your equations above
y > 10 - x
plug in (2,8)
8 > 10-2
8 > 8
doesnt work
On the calculator it shows that point on the table tho
So im confused
Cause if it shows the point in the table does that mean it is a solution
i have no idea what the table is
can someone explain?
On the calculator
i havent used a calculator in like 10 years my dude
That’s great lol
not sure what kind of table yours makes
(1) it doesnt satisfy the equations
or
(2) its not in both shaded areas on the graph
Ok
$\cos(x)=0$ when x is an odd multiple of $\frac{\pi}{2}$
How do I do dilations for a polar equation?
moshill1
but where does 2k + 1 come from
so 2k+1 is odd for all $k\in\mathbb{Z}$
moshill1
scalar multiples of r? @amber iron or do you mean x, y dilations
is it just some memorization thing or whats the logic behind it
$\cos(x)=0\implies x=\frac{(2k+1)\pi}{2}, k\in\mathbb{Z}$
moshill1
it's an odd number.
odd numbers are 1 more than even numbers
by parity logic of the integers
alright
as a note you can do anything for that that works to represent an odd number
2k-1, 4k+7
why does it have to be an odd number
cause those are the roots of cos(x)
like how sin has roots at multiples of pi
$\sin(x)=0\implies x=k\pi , k\in\mathbb{Z}$
moshill1
@glass lichen red is graph of r=1+costheta. when I did r=2(1+costheta) i got the light blue graph, but i want to create the dark blue graph
like a shifted dilation
why did you ping me?
Yeah polar co-ords arent taught until 2nd year at my uni 
wait looks like you just want to add 1 at every point
does any1 know if <5 is congruent to <6
if you're less than 5, you're less than 6
but if you're less than 6 you're not necessarily less than 5
since 5.5 exists
ok
or it is
it is not
if inverse cos of 1 = 0 why would it be 2k*pi
since 5!=6
for the equation above but 1 instead of 0
so i just converted it to rectangular coordinates and expanded it, thx
cause cos has a max at even multiples of pi
yes, the maximum of cos(x) is 1
because inverse of 1 is 0
cause cos is 2pi periodic
so everything repeats every 2pi
A function f has period a if $f(x+ka)=f(x),k\in\mathbb{Z}$
moshill1
does anyone know about my question
can you put the table you have?
ok so i have 2 functions in which y is not isolated. how do i shade in between them on desmos?
$\sum_{n=0}^\infty x^{4n+5}=x^5\sum_{n=0}^\infty (x^4)^n$
moshill1
jeez that was so easy
how did I not see that
$\sum_{n=0}^\infty x^{4n+5}=\frac{x^5}{1-x^4}$
moshill1
always look at difference between terms
ik it says quiz but it's a review assignment of calc 1 and i totally forgot how to do this
can someone help?
do the limits from both directions equal the same value?
if they do then its the value they equal, if they don't, the limit does not exist
yes
wow i put that at first but thought it was wrong
that means
is this one wrong then
i thought that after you take each derivative the number gets bigger meaning the x intercept gets bigger
but that sounds very wrong
this one is unrelated to the last one
f(2) = 0
f'(2) = negative (the slope is negative)
f''(2) = positive (the slope is increasing)
gosh i should've paid attention in calc 1
thanks so much
can u explain?
like why is it negative and positive
the first derivative is the slope of the graph
the graph is going down at x=2, so the slope is clearly negative
the second derivative is the change in slope. Since the slope is getting closer to 0 (flatter) and we know its negative now, that means the slope is increasing from some negative number to 0
so the second derivative is positive
What the heck is a limit and what does it have to do with asymptotes? Are they hard?
a limit is when you approach a number but dont actually get to it
Here is an easy one you want to buy a pc and you already have 7.31$ and the pc cost 802$ how much money do you need?
you have any work so far?
No I just made it up lol
wait do you need help or is it an example for someone else
For ppl who like math
ah
And wanna do some ig
Hi For any defined hypothesis test at level alpha=0.05, as n decreases, does the beta(probability of of accepting the null hypothesis when it's false) increase?
@celest tinsel it is $794.69 right?
when n is lower all false positve and false negative probability rise
,calc 802-7.31
Result:
794.69
Ya I suck at math lol
Wait it would be 68 cause I thought I had 31¢ but I actually had 32
yes
@dull bay thank you! may I ask what would happen to variance, if I'm testing mu for hypothesis and n decreases?
variance would remain constant right?
depending on how much data you lost
O I was actually 1¢ off nice
@cinder cloud
from 200 to 100 for example?
H0: u=u0 vs Ha:u=ua
the data follows normal distribution
probably constant then
Right, thank you!
np
𝕳𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖔
yo just a quick question about sig figs
ive got a value at 88,967 and they want it to 3sf
i want to say that's 89,000
but thats 2sf in itself
isnt it impossible to have that value as 3sf?
wait
the only "trick" i know is 100. has 3 sig figs
i mean it was a question to do with hydrostatics
so i dont know if they are too fussed with it
then again online syntax can be a pain
but when will you ever see 100. XD
Firstly, figure out the general form of such an exponential function
y = ... expression involving x
figure out what your unknown coefficients are
nice
you can try it out here and I can see how you are doing
Do I chose two points to do it right
you can check all 3 points to make sure
uh oh
firstly we know $y=Ab^x$, then we can substitute.
Element118
yep
the main idea is there, so it should be fine, but it would be better presentation to write $y=Ab^x$ first
Element118
oh ok
then it should be easy to solve for A and b, and you should be done
guys how do i do this how is it not pi/2 and 3pi/2
okay, what you want to do here is to do the same thing to both sides of the equation
yeah it's not, plug it in, it's cos not sin
it's 0 and cos is x axis, so it's pi/2 and 3pi/2
cos is x axis for unit circle
uihhh Sushi
hmm, let's see what happens when we divide both sides by -6
$\frac{6}{-6}=\frac{b^{-1}}{-6}$
so x axis 0 means pi/2 for y and 3pi/2 for other y
Element118
Swag
hmm, doesn't look any simpler
no not at all lol
how else do you know how to write negative exponents?
like $x^{-2}$ is $\frac{1}{??}$
Element118
Element118
ohhhh shoot
negative exponents are obtained through dividing
positive exponents is repeated multiplication
oh dang
negative exponent is repeated dividing
negative exponents
can you solve it now given that?
yeah?
how did you get b=-6?
uhhhhhhh I thought that to make it a positive we had to divide
you remember $b^{-1}=\frac{1}{b}$, right?
yes
Element118
so $6=b^{-1}=\frac{1}{b}$
Element118
b^{-1} is 6. Now I'm using 1/b to rewrite b^{-1} because fractions are easier than exponents
ok
angie
idk how to do this
do you get it yet?
I think so
the next part is kinda confusing though
now that I found a and B
for this
what do I do with this info
there are many ways to solve this, but I think the cleanest way is to use the right angle triangle
you write $y=Ab^{x}$ substituting in $A$ and $b$.
Element118
that's the equation of the curve
y=3(6)^x
right
@woeful pulsar
Oh shoot
bro
this actually makes sense lmao I did this last week
and isn't it supposed to be -x
yeah, you need to solve for b carefully
yeah, -x can work
but another way is to solve for b too
ooh
ok
I have another one I have a Question on
I think this one I have to use fractions
So I chose to do 1,9 and -1,4
so far I got 2 ^1/4 = b^2
you are asked to find the length of an arc
a circular arc
do you know how to find the length of a circular arc using its radius and angle?
No
I don't know the formula off the top of my head
@copper charm okay, then do you know how to find the length of the full circle?
Ugh no I don’t remember
you don't remember C = 2πr?
Oh yeah o do
literally the definition of pi, no less
okay so your arc is not the full circle but only 66 degrees
how many degrees are there in a full circle?
you didn't answer my question
but r is the radius of your circle
and the problem gives it to you
Ik that r is radius but what would it be 10?
of course it'd be 10
what else could it possibly be lol
anyway,
how many degrees are there in a full circle?
I get 62.8
how many degrees are there in a full circle?
are you saying a full circle measures 62.8 degrees?
360
great, there are 360 degrees in a full circle.
but your arc covers only 66 degrees.
therefore its length is 66/360 of the circumference.
does that make sense to you? Y/N
Yea
5.4?
When I divide 360/66
why are you calculating 360/66 and then claiming that to be the answer?
I’m not sure how to do it that’s why I’m asking you for help...
i was under the impression that we just walked through how to do this problem, but it now appears that you have ignored it all
we have established that you know how to get the circumference
and i told you how the arc length relates to the circumference
and it should have been abundantly clear that finding the arc length is your goal here
i'd greatly prefer to be like, listened to when i attempt to provide help
I was listening but I didn’t understand
if there's something i said you don't understand then quote the thing and ask me about it.
which part did you not understand?
why 5.4 ???
360/66
where u get that from
no, this won't give you the answer.
the value of 360/66 is almost irrelevant to the problem
you might want to find the circumference first.
no almost.. it is
no
you are rounding too crudely
notice how it says to round to the nearest hundredth
you are rounding to the nearest tenth
That’s what it showed in my Calc only 62.8
and ideally, for intermediate calculations you should round to more decimal places than for the answer
are you using 3.14 for pi?
Yes
get more decimal places
replace 3.14 with something like 3.14159
I get 62.8
whats the full circumference without rounding
something that has more decimal places of pi
not just two
does your calculator not have a dedicated pi button anyway?
a lot of them do
and if yours does then really you should use that instead
you can find circumference calc online
It’s 62.8318
okay great
what is it to nearest 100th then
so that's your circumference
ez dubz
62.83
good job
ethan the circumference is an intermediate result not the answer, let's not
l
so 62.8318 is your circumference
great, there are 360 degrees in a full circle.
but your arc covers only 66 degrees.
therefore its length is 66/360 of the circumference.
now look at this again
That’s gives me .183...
really? you are calculating (66/360)*62.8318 and getting some number less than 0.2?
Do you not understand what I’m calculating?
When I do 66/360 I get .183...
I get 11.5 as my answer
the arc is 66/360 of the circumference
and there you go again, rounding too crudely.
no, your answer is not 11.5
Then?
go through the calculations again, this time rounding appropriately
they tell you to round to the nearest hundredth.
when they tell you to round to the nearest hundredth, you round to the nearest hundredth. you do not round to the nearest tenth as you did.
11.50
Result:
11.519173063163
i cannot see what you're doing so i cannot tell you how you're fucking up your calculator input
yes 11.52
again
i don't know what you put in your calculator that resulted in 11.50
and not 11.52
Hi guys, I came across this problem and I felt that the question had a typo
Because I think the arc CRI is independent from wherever point R is so doesn’t that mean R could be anywhere
Idk it never mentioned I
lmao
I checked online and it seems to be a typo, it should be major arc CR (then the solution is obvious)

neither would I know lol
It’s definitely a typo as I isn’t defined
Can someone explain to me what i got wrong? thank you
since the function is differentiable the limit as h approaches 0 from the positive direction and the negative direction would be the same, so choice A would give you the value of f'(3)
so A should not have been circled
So would C and E be the answers?
E is the only one that needs to be circled for question 13
Thanks, are you able to explain question 14 too?
B is just the definition of the derivative and to get from B to C we can substitute x=3+h
E would need to be circled here as wel
consider the absolute value function, |x|
its continuous at x=0 but not differentiable at x=0
f'(0) does not exist, but it is continuous at x=a
the two-sided limit f(x) as x approaches 0 does exist
and there is no hole or vertical tangent at x=0
so none of A B C or D are necessarily true
Thank you!
the sign affects the concavity
the -sign is there as it should be since you have a concave down parabola
this channel is free at the moment so yes
I was wondering why sin(x) is in O(x) but not in O(x^2) since the taylor expansion of sin is of much higher order than x^2
Me and my friends got a maths puzzle
we been working on it for a day and can't figure it out
google is your best friend
rip king Johan's question
by not studying for your test?
nicholas please spare us and stop talking, we aren't going to help you cheat
each row and column adds up to the same number?
Yeah, diagonal included
what number is that?
sum/3
just gotta figure it out
I'm too lazy to add them up
lowest you can get is 4
and that will fail
I feel like it's 4 2/3 or 5
maybe 5 1/3
15 total, each row, column, and diagonal adds to 5
It doesn't tho, cause diagonal from top right to bottom left equals 4. the rest are 5.
is it tho
assuming diagonals have to be the same
what if it's 4 2/3 idk
everything gotta be the same number
there's 15 total points, and 3 rows
ahh I see
how do you know that?
help anyone
That was like the only hint
actually i see
yes it does have to be in the middle
let's see what else we can get
Stop mutlipsoting
yeah idk it would be easier if i had them irl, but there's probably a clean math solution to this
@limpid spade channels are busy
this one is busy and you posted in it anywayd
try a better excuse
Hmm wait lemme check smth
didnt notice it
How do i solve sin(3x)=a. a is a given number that is in interval 0<a<1. x is in radians
i think 1 and 2/3 has to be in the center
yeah changing the center nice
good puzzle
Is this correct?
,rotate
yep
ask in an unoccupied channel, also i'm a little suspicious that this is your work for one of the questions on your test

hmm its practice paper
<@&268886789983436800>
just ask your math teacher for help
what's up
rules state no test/exam stuff
suspected case of test help
^
I legit just joined this server and the rules said no cheating on tests. I came to ask help for a math game lol
which still hasnt be solved 😔
scratch that. it's a confirmed case
someone posted the answer for you
ok banned
lol
i didn't read your soln just saw you posted lmaoo
It confuses me, cause what I had is the best possible solution, or atleast I thought so
middle one is 1 2/3
can you repost the squares i can't find it
wait why does your solution not work?
it seems right
divide each by 3 to get the puzzle
It is right, but it's a different question.
it's the same question times 3?
they all add up to 15 as far as I can tell
It's in statistic
subtract 2 from both sides and combine the stuff on the left into a single fraction
wait so (x/x-2 )-2
?/
also im sorry im really stupid, but if it is wouldnt the -2 cancel out
?
oh ok thanks guys
integrate v(t) to get x(t), the position function
(2,0) is a point on x(t), use this to figure out the value of the +C
the particle moves to the left when the velocity is negative
find the values of t for which v(t) is negative
hey
i have chemistry problem i need some help with
i did this
but in their solution they converted 0.6 g to 6g... i dont understand why
they didn't "convert 0.6 g to 6 g"
they converted 0.6 g / 100ml into 6 g/L
100ml of solution contains 0.6 grams of glucose
therefore a liter will contain ten times as much
but in other examples they didnt do that which confused me
arent you finding the number of moles per liter
can you show an example where this conversion didnt happen
OK so we always convert?
like we make sure its g/L
@vale wigeon also for the first picture i think they have it wrong
do we say 1L or 0.1 L?
so we convering 100ml to L = 0.1
@brave aurora channel busy please move
yes because molarity is measured in moles per L
Give a thirdgradepolynom p(x) that has zero points -3,3 and 1 also p(0)=18
I need help please
If x = -3, x = 3 and x = 1 are roots then (x+3), (x-3) and (x - 1) are factors of p(x).
p(x) = a(x + 3)(x - 3)(x - 1) is what you effectively need to look at.
THANK YOUY
forthis semi circle, if i were to integrate it, first with x then y, will the bounds for both limits of
x = √(-y^2+1) and y will be both 0?
the semicircle?
yes
do you have the integral?
the integral is
are you integrating by slices perpendicular to the x axis or by slices perpendicular to the y axis
where did you get 3y from?
is it the function you need to integrate inside the semicircle?
yes sorry thats the function given
idk there's missing information that is not given
3y dy dx
I think you might want to give the original question so it's not that confusing
so you want to write it somewhat like $\int\int3ydydx$?
Element118
or are you trying to write it like $\int\int 3ydxdy$?
Element118
this one
okay so the y is outside
so the range of y is from 0 to 1
yup
deal with the outside first
$\int_0^1\int 3ydxdy$
Element118
because the minimum y in the semicircle is 0, and the maximum y is 1
bcos the Q gives y as 0 to √1-x^2
what is x
x is from -1 to 1
sorry can u explain this part again
we haven't parameterised x yet
when writing $\int\int 3ydxdy$, it should be effectively $\int f(y)dy$
Element118
the inside an expression that depends on y
x is inside, so x depends on y
y cannot depend on x
ok i think i get that part but then im still confused abt choosing the limit bounds
y is between 0 and 1
does this mean y isnt from 0 to √(1-x^2) ?
because of our order of writing the variables we need to write x in terms of y
not y in terms of x
ok sorry last Q. but the Q didnt state the max val of y is 1 but how did u derive the max val of y as 1?
from the semicircle
im still confused man :( cos i still see it as the max val of y from the semi circle is y=√(1-x^2) how does that turn to 1? @woeful pulsar
okay the function is given
How to solve sin(3x)=a if a is given number in the interval 0<=a<=1
1 is the maximum value of that function
oh wait is it u sub the val of x given which is 0 to 1 into the y function to get the val of y?
it's just finding the maximum of the function
How to solve sin(x)=a? Then just replace x with 3x
yeah so i jus sub the value of x given to the function of y to find the max val right? is my understanding right tho
erm... if you can figure out which value of x would give the maximum then yeah
but if you can't figure out you might need to differentiate and find critical points and stuff
I did it dw
Can someone help with this question.
Sorry.
Determine the derivative by first principal.
not really.
do you know how to take derivatives of functions using first principles?

