#help-0
1 messages · Page 73 of 1
the number of the card
what?
it represents an event occuring following another event
but scratch that
the c here is just to break it down card by card
I've just never seen someone say A(c) so i didnt know that was A and B
but no
the rule is for one card
A(1) is the assertion " card 1 has a number less or equal to 5 on one side"
just replace c by 1
we never did it like that
ok
i'm not in your course though idk what you did
ik im just saying that to say im not understanding bc i didnt learn it tht way and u have more experience than I do
the rule for what?
Rule: If a card has a number less than or equal to 5 on one side, then it has a letter that comes before M in the alphabet on the other.
If less than or equal to five on one side, then letter before m on the other.
P- card on one side has a value lesser than or equal to five
Q- card on one side has a letter before M in the alphabet
which card are you talking about?
u said what does P mean in the rule
thats what i answered
so any card
yeah
so P is an affirmation
that talks about a card
any card right
but P does not say
universal affirmative?
"all cards have a number smaller than 5"
All cards with a value lesser than or equal to 5 will have a letter before M on the other side.
yeah
right
so what you just did
is use a quantifier
For all cards
P(card) => Q(card)
but the statement is only applicable to cards with <5
the defintion of A=> B
is not(A) or B
so if not(A)
then not(A) or B
which is exactly A=>B
yeah but it doesnt contradict what i said
the statement "if A then B"
is always true if Not(A)
because "if A then B" only tells you about when A
it only gives you information about what happens when A
?
it gives a definition
of what is a contrapositive
or an inverse
it doesnt contradict anything
like all of these are definitions in a way$
they are not the same or depend on each other necessarely
the rule?
So the rule states: P(card) )=> Q(card)... meaning a card with a number less than or equal to 5 on it's side will then have a letter before M on the alphabet on the other side.
yeah
i already know we would need to flip 5 and 2
u said not to rationalize it yet but idk how we are getting anywhere from the logical predicate language tghings we outlined already?
no because its not consistent
its a little easier to do the question not with the P(c)
i did the whole P(c) thing to make you use quantifiers
bc rn i wanna derieve which cards to choose and then get the intricacies bc then its in circles'
which is imho
imho?
the point of the exercise
idek what a quantifier uses
no no historically the exercise is used to evaluate human error in misunderstanding conditional statements
pitfalls of reasoninng
basically what i was trying to convey
is that
the statement is for all the cards
so only 1 card where it doesnt stand
and the whole statement doesnt stand
and this is a rule of the Forall quantifier
which i wanted us to use
to disprove a statement that starts with forall
you only need 1 counter example
idk man i think its easier to rationalize why to pick the cards and work backwards
bc we know why 5 and 2 minimally have to be chosen
but there has to be 1 more card
but then
what is 2 doesnt even need to be flipped
ion even know
ok but how are we moving forward
then
you can
we can use this
~AvB
bc youre saying theyre the same
which they are
but i will be unable to follow at all
so why not stick with ~PorQ
also you should understand
why they are the same
p=>q means if q then p
right
but what if p is false?
doest that disprove p=>q?
im just rlly tired i jave this then an derivation ive been trying to do forever bc i dont understand argument mapping or derivations at all... which ofc u dont have to do with me but i slept 3 hours or less last night so im just very burnt out lololol
bc i know theyre the same
im not understadning
but ik it
and i woukd like to progress and understand later
bc conceptually ik theyre the same
ok
then if we us not(P) or Q
for any case where you have not(P) you dont need to do anything
because the whole statement is true
so for example the 8
wait can u reword
...so not inclusive or?
its inclusive
when its just or
in the context of logic
you should most of the time asusme its inclusive
ik'
yeah
bc if u flip it over and its a number after 5 it doesnt violate anything
bc nothing says 6-10 cant have a letter before M
and if P is true, well Q is true so all good
6-10?
its just like above 5
oh ok
yeah
basically
an implication
only tells you what should happen when the if statement is true
reversely, if the then condition is verified,
no matter what is the if statement
the implication is verified
...?
"if its rainy then i take my raincoat"
yes
i take my rain coat
so if its rainy
i have my rain coat
and the implication is true
u right
and if its not
but then what if rainy then no rain coat
well the implication doesnt tell me anything about sunny days
so u need Q to be true
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
~PvQ
nvm no oh
its hard but you should maybe rethink about all of this later
at some point the true ooh will come
true
i wanted to aim to get these two done and then maybe aderivation question before sleeping
bc then i will like
have a basis and understand derivations
bc YT? sucks
did not help
idk
but
ok
um
We only flip cards where P=>Q is true, yes?
to reaffirm
whaaaaaaaaa
if the card fits in P=>Q then we flip to find out
no we need to flip the unsure cards
to me its bc they fall under the rule immidiaely, in logic brainness lmfao what wwould u say
5 and 2 both verify P
but like how do u derive what is an unsure card-- what was the point of the p=>Q beyond the rule said that then ;-;
the point
is to use the definition
to prove that some cards are sure
for example 8 is sure
i mean
it more verifies P=>Q
no
;;-;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
thats why we need to flip
it doesnt make sense
If we flip the card: it can affirm or negate P=>Q
i cant
ive been at this for two days
yeah
but if you already know P=>Q
these two combined are 10 points
you dont need to flip
i cant fail the course or i drop out
F=>D
LMDAO
but why are u saying it affirms p
because u can see that the card is a <5 card
p- cards with <5 on them
for 5 and 2
u gotta flip it bc if it doesnt have a letter before M, it violates the rule
but logically
ion know
i dont get it
here
you dont need "it"
you need Q to be true
if P is true
my dude you are not in the right mental state to understand things
i need to do this stuff this is so so so so so so much
i have been doing this since 11:50Am
pretty much
and got no where on other things
its all due tomorrorw afternoon
and im stressed
and if i dont pass these things iw ill fail the course
and if i fail the course
i have to drop out
which is not cash money
technically it was due yesterday
if anything
technically it was due in May
but i was given an INC bc of life stuff
then here i am
ik ofc i will liekly stay up im jsut rlly tired
and i dont wan nadrop out
i think its just an answer but w an explanation of some sort
but if the answer is there
but it sucks
these two questions are worth only 10 together
like example
file:///C:/Users/luaij/Desktop/FinalLogicDocument.pdf
this doc
i have NOTHING for 2.2, 3.2, and especially not 6.2
i had 5.2 completely done
i accidentally threw it away
file:///C:/Users/luaij/Desktop/Logical_Reasoning_Spring_2022_Exam_1_(Midterm).pdf
this one
I have an attempt, like its done but prolly not right of 2.2... then nothing of 3.2 but but but 3/4 things are the exact same as the final's 3.2 which is cool
or would be
if i knew how to do it
what's this?
the answer
even if you dont know about the answer
i wouldve thought 3 cards total
X and Z are both after M
and 5 and 2 are both before 5
so X and Z have the same answer
and 5 and 2 have the same answer
so its not surprising we dont have 3 flipped cards
so if Z or X had a <5 on the other wise then it violates, thats why?
yeah
as i said
X is card 3
we would need to get not P
for the implication to hold
or in other words to not violate we would need >5
which is what you just said
reading #3 rational if we need not P, why?
rephrase that please
reading the reasoning behind why we would flip card X.. why would we want to flip and assure there is a ~P?
if we want the implication to hold
as you said
if we flip and see P
ohhhh
so if we see a <5 then its violated okokok
instead of the long question i havent done yet, maybe could you check my argument map of something i already did?
yeah
just getting on to say that im the real spooky j @hexed hawk
yall have a good day now
this may be easier to read! this is the thing the argument map is based on
👋
there can only be one 🤺
yeah its just that i dont know what exactly is an argument map
but from your drawing i can kind of guess
in this i also outlined my intermediate conclusions
i just rlly dont know if the argument map is right
yessir
3 is from 1 & 2, 8 is from 4 & 7, 9 is from 3 & 8, 11 is from 9 & 10, 13 is from 11 and 12
for sure
i didnt draw them the same way bc lets say like
a and b make conclusion c
the premises can be either independent or dependent
what does that even mean
but all the 5->6 and 4->7 seems wrong
like it doesnt make sense
i wrote about it here
uhhhhh idk dependent premises logically require each other and work together to support a conclusion
P1. If there are clouds and high levels of humidity then it will rain.
P2. There are clouds and high levels of humidity.
C. Therefore, it will rain.
you only need 1
these are dependent
11 and 12 are def dependant
why?
i dont doubt but would like an explanation
if you remove one you dont get the conclusion
bc ik what both are but dk how to always tell
- constitution prohibits the death penalty. 12. Anything the constitution prohibits should be declared unconstitutional.
this was why i did that
but again i am so unsure about my graph
so if u have reasons behind why ill redo it and incluude the reaossns
reasons*
dont worry about antonyms
you are not studying law
you are studying a stupid example
the explanation for them being dependant
is that 12 alone doesnt make sense
eventhough
11 could lead to 13 on its own
given this antonym thing
seeeeeeeeee
drawing diagrams of weird affirmations
its always like this, they cant give clear examples for their exercises
but assuming the way this is written
i think 4 5 6 and 7 all lead at once to 8
interpretations <3
and are not linked to each other as you did
idk independantly or dependatly tho
8 needs 7 absolutely
i thought 5 only proves 6, and then 4 supports 7
7 needs 6
5 and 6 prove "the death sentence is unconstitutionnal"
give me the hard thing its almost 1am
logic is something you gotta be keen on if you do maths later
but its actually easier to apply the legit rules
than to try to interpret bullshit
ok ok ok ok
so choose one of these
one has more mathy stuff
the other
i jjust didnt know what it means
,rccw
the weight and success condition things..... CLUELESS the explanatory stuff thats less mathy more explaining i could likely do if i dont cry LOLLL
Derivation for me ......... 
these two are for the derivation.... putting into standard linear format is easier
but
derivations
where we have to say what inference or substiution rules as u did earlier.... absolutely clueless
these are 3/4 ive been trying to do since 11:50Am
it is SO weird and doesn't make sense, but he says it doesnt have to in order to be a valid or invalid argument... just has to follow rules
like the invalid argumentr
roses need water. all living things need water. therefore, all roses are living things
belief bias makes u go yassss but really its invalid
like
my bf baljinder reads manga. all slavs read manga. therefore, all baljinder's are slavic
[he is punjabi]
or like
all dogs drink water. all insects drink water. therefore, all dogs are insects
no the rose thing isnt valid
yeah it isnt
this is not correct also
gotta sleep sorry
also i cant do this efficiently
yes ik they're all invalid, they're the same form.. just was an example
no worries
thank you for all of ur help
i think your best shot is ask someone that already took the course
is this really a maths course?
it looks like a philosophy thing
it's both
and then u see like
math majors, engineering majors, and phil majors all together
Closed by @hexed hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
question
Closed by @cunning vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please help
@bold panther Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i understand this: cos(v)*(1+cos(u))*sin(v/8) and sin(u)*sin(v/8)+cos(v/8)1.5 and finally, sin(v)(1+cos(u))*sin(v/8)
understand what?
It’s like a cute snail
hi, is anyone know how to calculate the probability. There are two dices (dice A (roll 100 times and B roll 100 times) and I want to know the probability number 1 is belong to dice A not B. Thanks
are you asking me?
sorry I can't help you too
@past lark Has your question been resolved?
@past lark Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @past lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do part B? I know the sum of roots are -p/1 and products are q/1
I don’t know what else comes next
that's pretty straightforward imo
you've found alpha+2 and beta+2 in (i) and (ii)
both the sum and product
and you know this
Yes,
dont you get the idea?
But I don’t know what I’m supposed to write?
$(\alpha+2)+(\beta+2)=-p$
\$(\alpha+2)(\beta+2)=q$
nichoals
-k + 4 is the sum and -2k + 13 is the prod
yep
hmm i think your (ii) is not quite correct
It’s not?
$(\alpha+2)(\beta+2)=\alpha\beta + 2(\alpha+\beta) + 4 = 1 - 2k + 4 = 5 - 2k$
nichoals
Do I solve for p?
Is it supposed to be k+4? Not negative?
No need for 4??
Isn’t it -p/1?
So it would be -k + 4 = -p
And then
-k = -p - 4
-k/-1 = -p - 4/-1
So k = p + 4
Wait
I think I did it wrong
Shit
Ignore what I did
Lmao ik
😭
Let me re do it
no what i meant was
\in part (ii), the OP wrote $\alpha\beta+2(\alpha+\beta)+4=1+2(-k+4)+4$
\but alpha+beta = -k, not -k+4
nichoals
-p / -1 = -k + 4 / -1
p = k - 4
And we repeat for q same steps?
Alright
-q/1 = -2k + 13
Hold on gonna do it rq
Wait it’s not -q
just q/1
It’s just q = -2k + 13?
Me?
but anyways
tysm guys
i understand
@wheat isle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
without using calculus, find the minimum value of x + (1/(x+1)) where x>-1.
(someone please help i suck at inequalities)
$(x+1) + \frac{1}{x+1} - 1 \geq 2 - 1$ with equality iff $x+1=1$
Ann
Closed by @fair swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
bruh
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Mee
It may help to change .333 to 1/3
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @shrewd tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
nah don't call me sir mate
But your my teacher
im not a teacher im just another random guy on this app
Your elder than 16 right
no
But your helping me…
i am 16
The question is in German so I had to use translator 😅😅
Otherwise I would have send the photo again. Sorry for the trouble
That’s good to hear 🙂
ok ill type it out
Thanks 🙏
hi
the second could fill it in 5
how long does it take if they are opened at the same time
hi
good
how long does it take if the second one is opened half an hour before the first
Do you have manners like literally interrupting while he was teaching me?
sry
No problems mate
Please check #❓how-to-get-help
ok
Thanks mate
thanks mate
@astral grove please carry on
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
can u resend image please mate
am sry to interupped but i cant message in #❓how-to-get-help so how can i get my own channel
type in an unused help channel
right now help channels 20 21 and 43 are open
type ur question in there mate
beautiful
so i don't know this off the dome
but im happy to try this
for part a
how much does each tank fill per hour?
@full fern
Do you want to voice call?
if possible yes mate
Sure mate go to dms
k chill
.close
Closed by @full fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand this, so | a - b | is equal to -(a-b)??
|a - b| is equal to -(a-b) precisely when a is less than b.
but | -2 + 5 | = 3, -2(-2+5) = -3
i don't understand what point you're trying to make, sorry.
also you made at least one typo.
-2 + 5 = -2 - (-5)
-2 > -5
| -2 + 5 | = (-2 + 5)
@flat bane Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you type this into a graphing calcualtor
when I type it in I get a quadratic but this should be able to show a curve or something
like its an upwards opening quadratic but the cost of producing lawnmowers cant go up forever if Im supposed to find a minimum
<@&286206848099549185>
note the 0 < x <= 35
am I making a stat plot?
oh I made my y max 1500 and my x max 35
there we go okay it worked!!
.close
Closed by @vestal talon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I graph the inverse of f(x)=|2x|
What is the domain?
If its the entire number line then you wont get an inverse cuz the function wont be injective
So I should graph it without the entire number line?
Appropriately restricting the domain would allow you to obtain an inverse
What would that look like on a graph?
Reflection of the graph along the line y=x
As long as the function is bijective
Closed by @errant python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello hi i have a question: six women and two men wait in a grocery store checkout line. determine the number of possible ways these customers can stand in line, given that A: the men do not stand together; B: the men do not stand on either end; C: the men do not stand together and do not stand on either end
Simple!
First, note that none of the question concerns the ordering of the women. So, you can just order the women first
A: You can place the women first, then place the men in the spaces between women (also start & end of line)
B: Find the total number of ways the line can form, then subtract the cases where men are on either end
C: Do it like A but this time the start & end of the line do not count as empty spaces
Then you find out the possible placement of the males.
@bronze girder Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bronze girder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
pls confirm if my answeer is correct
@bronze girder Has your question been resolved?
@bronze girder Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help me with this
@rancid wolf Has your question been resolved?
@rancid wolf Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rancid wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the numerator part of the domain
Wdym by part?
The domain is all the x values that dont make the function bad
Yeah it should just be -3 and 3
why
Because the other values just make the function equal 0
Not infinity or anything undefined like that
I definitely dont understand
If you plug in -5/2 you get a defined value
Although i just realized you messed up so it wont actually be zero
Either way the numerator doesnt effect domain if its a polynomial
Yeah thats how
ahhh
Anyways if it were pos
okay ill try to cram on my drive to class rn
It still wouldnt be excluded from the domain
Oh
okay gotta blast or ill be late
True
Closed by @vestal talon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have this linear map between two linear spaces and I have to find map matrix with reagards to B and C, how to do thath?
@pliant estuary Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@pliant estuary Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If W is a subset of the linear space V.
What is the meaning of this expression?
this seems to be a definition for the span of a set S
are Ws sub linear spaces?
or just sets?
@upbeat kayak Has your question been resolved?
Intersection of all sets W that contain the set S
from this it just looks like l(S) = S itself
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Ah okay, ty
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The question is
How did they get that answer? From the laws I've learned in lectured it should be a different answer
they used product rule first
then they simplified it
Why did the log base 3 stay? My answer is the same but the log base 3 and the fraction at the back aren't there
$ u(x) = 2^x $
Considering these laws. The log shouldn't come with
Oh wait! I get it now! For the product rule I used the deriv instead of the base equation! I think I see where I went wrong
thank God
if you are done, please close this channel
How do I do that?
.close
.close
Closed by @thorny sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
f(z) = z^2 Re(z)
where is this complex differentiable? z=0? nowhere?
What's Re(z)?
real part of z
f(z) = f(c) + f'(c) (z-c) + mew(z)
no dont do that
use it first and see where you end up
you get into pain
i used CR eq and got its satisfied only at z=0
when do we use this btw
so does this mean complex diff at z=0 holomorphic nowhere
so
oh god
never go there in complex analysis if you have an easier way
wherever cr eq is satisfied its complex diff
yes
and this is mentioned
cauchy riemann is literally saying that you can write derivative as complex number
lol
idk when i would use this?
its the best novel

when wld i use this
can i not just plug cr equ?
INFINITE HAITUS CUZ OF CCP LOL
also ig bot is ded rn
oh sed

ok well
thanks
Breakthrough
Level up Imperial Sky Layer 3
wow
a breakthrough in understanding
thanks snow and penguin person
💕
.close
Closed by @ornate condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Writing the equation of a secant line
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone teach me a step by step process to solve this?
