#precalculus
1 messages · Page 266 of 1
The solution that they gave is right only for k=4j where j is necessarily odd. That is what i am saying. You said it's valid only when k is odd
Youre solving for x not for the values on the unit circle that make sec undefined
Looking for specific values of x aaccording to this function
Lol. No you're right. It is only valid when k is odd
Actually you know what, we're both doing it wrong
We should consider kπ+π/2 and kπ+3π/2 as the two cases to get the answer
I'm back - my bad, I didn't fully explain what the problem is asking for: here's everything it asks for (only looking at domain), also this is a different function this time
sin is opposite on hypotenuse
in this case y/r
sin(theta) = y only on the unit circle
@remote raptor ^
(R-C)(x) = R(x) - C(x)
oooooo
1/(1/cos) is cos
@sick steppe
i don't understand this?
What I understand is that i'm supposed to take 7 from g and replace it with f(g(7))
what's g(7)?
1
ok so what's f(g(7)) if g(7)=1
yeah
Just try the questions lol
no...
then divide y^2 by y
you just read off the center and radius
1/(1/cos) is cos
@sick steppe then why domain of both are different
cause 1/cos dne if cos(x)=0
but 1/(1/cos) = 1/sec = cos
Then why domain are different
1/sec will give same domain as 1/(1/cos)
which both giving different domain from cos
1/(1/cos=0)=1/infinity
which doesn't exist
huh? $\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\cos(0)}}=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{1}}=1$
Al𝟛dium:
i don't understand you at all
what the fuck is that $\neq$, which 2 things you say have different domain?
Al𝟛dium:
1/sec=1/(1/cos)
Domain will not contain odd multiples of pi/2
but
1/(1/cos)=cos
whose domain is R
this is where I am confusing
because it's the same expression but different domain
^
we were told to make this shape using parametrics
i don't really know where to start
the rules are that the pattern should loop
meaning that t can be infinity and it'll still be a triangle
@viscid thistle ask here
<@&286206848099549185>
What ?
@viscid thistle
?
DE?
Differential eq
differentiate wrt x to get 1/a + y'/b = 0 and then y' = -b/a i guess
with initial condition y(0) = b
Yep thanks
chain rule
@stuck lark i see
I need help with fundamental identities
@viscid thistle still wondering? If so, do you have an specific problem you are stuck with
Will anyone help me before my exams for calculus?
@viscid thistle still wondering
can you help me?
do you have an specific problem you are stuck with?
none I just dont know how to solve like I am so confused
The help channels are solely for help with math, so feel free to post your question. Asking whether you can ask a question or if anyone knows about some specific topic is unnecessary, so please try to avoid questions of that nature.
"fundamental identities" is very general
like this problem idk how to slove it
Do you have to prove it or solve for theta
What does your book tell you to do
prove it
like the rule it said I should start of with the complicated side which is the left right?
In 3 for example it does not really matter but generally yes
In 3, consider multiplying on num and den by something
will I be like needing this
to like reciprocal the identity
"reciprocal the identity" is vague
you can multply both sides by cos*(1+sin) and u get the pythagorean identity
.........
?
The fact that you entered and said something that i wanted him to think in order to create intuition.
Sigh
yeah he shouldnt have said that
like its about learning not giving me the answer
hmm
KANE, YOU WERE GIVEN THE LAST CHANCE.
It's NOT obvious for them
Kane
dont
thats not learning
I'll leave this to a mod to decide over you.
Obvious is even worse than trivial
It's like changing with a synonym
ok ill note that for the future
The thing is that you should've noted that in the previous 4 times.
ok
hmm
@lime bolt
The point isn't "don't use this specific word". It's the overall idea of showing off that something is "easy" for you instead of being helpful.
i see
So yeah. I did warn you.
at the x^2(x^2+1) line is where it goes wrong algebraically
oh.....
ye
Can anyone help me with this
Sorry for bad quality
Snipping tool like broke
Once I plug in 2+h for the equation I don't know what to do
You have to expand out the whole f(2+h)
And see if you can cancel terms from there
So e.g. the first term there would be
10*(2+h)^2
Expand that out using foil/distributive prooperty
And see what can be canceled out by other terms that appear
That would be my guess for what they want you to do
Yeah gotcha
So you get (10h^2+36h+44)-44/h
Then you'd just take out the h yeah?
And get 10h+36
Yes if you did the steps correctly so far that works
Alright neat ty
Based on how they wrote the answer i would assume you must be able to pull an h out of the top
Yeah
This is gonna be a dumb question
But would you just do 6-7x>= 0?
To start off
Or would you distribute the 5
I got x<=6/7 and I'm not super sure if I did it right
And then after that I'm not sure how to write that as interval notation
No need to distribute the 5
The domain issues are all caused within the radical
So what you did is correct
You need all cases where the inside is greater than or equal to 0
Ok so all those pieces there describe one function
Look at the leftmost piece
It seems that when x is between -5 and -3
The way the function behaves is that it takes on a constant value of y=-3
You can describe either by inequality or interval which x values give the different y values
This one is called piecewise because the function behaves a certain way and then suddenly jumps to a different "piece" that behaves differently
The end point being dotted or open tells you if you include the endpoints
Yes exactly
Yeah alright think I got it ty again
Yw
It should be an open point right
But that'd interfere with the closed one with the other graph is my trouble
Unless I just did something else wrong as well which is possible
open doesn't really interfere with closed
the issue is your graph isn't defined for x in (1,2]
The lower piece is closed at 1 whoch means it includes 1
The upper piece is open at 1 meaning that it doesnt quite reach 1
You can imagine that the open 1 on top is picking up exactly where the closed 1 came to a halt
Oh ok
These would be right, right?
Or did I write inflection points wring5
Wrong
@everyone can someone remind me how to find asymptotes of a rational expression?
vertical
x^2-64/8x-64
8x-64=0
(x^2 - x) has to be less than or = 12
so (x^2 - x - 12) has to be less than or = 0
(x-4)(x+3) is less than or = 0
i think b = 4 because 4^2 - 4 = 12 which is included in the domain
f * g = f(g(x)) = f(x^2 - x) = sqrt(12 - (x^2 - x))
= sqrt(-x^2 + x + 12)
= sqrt((-x+4)(x+3))
-x+4 >= 0
-x >= -4
x <= 4
x+3 >= 0
x >= -3
-3 <= x <= 4
Range = |-3, 4|
first make a triangle with those points
find the y = mx + b equation that goes through b and c
then find the line perpendicular to that, that goes through A
then find the distance between A, and the intersection between the two lines
there's prob some formula for that actually
@naive prism
Isn't 1/(square root of 2/2) 2/(square root of 2)? i don't get it
uhh, no?
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$
but $\frac{1}{\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}} = \sqrt{2}$
proof: multiply numerator and denominator by $\sqrt{2}$ in both cases.
ConfusedReptile:
ok ty
Any ideas on how to find m ?
I guess I know x+2 is a factor I could just use remainder theorem to find m ?
0 = 14(-2)^2 + m(-2) - 38
solve for m, and then use another method to find the rest of the factors?
14x^2 +9x-38 doesn't looks like it factors easily .. would I use polynomial division or quadratic formula after this?
I guess I could just graph it in my calculator to find the zeros
@pastel cloud you're right that 0 = 14(-2)^2 -2m -38, so you can get m easily
So you use the fact that the HA is y=-2/7 and the fact that the degree of the numerator = degree of the denominator
to find k ^
oh I know how to get K, but I'm told to also find the other vertical asymptotes if there are any
The question you posted doesnt have anything to do with finding the other VA that I can see
Nope your pic is only find k and m
it says in brackets (note there may be other vertical asymptotes)
oh lmao
yeah
but you can find the other VA as 14x^2 + 9x -38 is factorable
since b^2-4ac > 0
oof
ill be fine... i think
im comfortable with factor theorem and remainder theorem, reading graphs, knowing asymptotes, etc
u helped me the other day so thanks for that.
Found the maximum on a graph but it gave me long decimal values. How do I instead see it as a fraction?
Can i see your number
For X I have -0.7320494 and Y is 2.5980762 so it's not rounding errors
I'm graphing 1/4(x-1)(x-4)(x+2)
And need the fractional values for the min and max
Unless they come out whole
@steel sequoia d/dx the function then quad formula is the only way you'll get exact answers
Just finished my test... I think i did well
took longer than it should have, but I still had some spare time to go over my answers thoroughly.
So I'm currently trying to precalculus. I wanted to know what you people thought would be the best sites and books to learn it
firstly: "Trying to precalculus"
2ndly: Khan Academy or Professor Leonard on Youtube
Thank you
im so confused on how you do this
i so far found the center of the circle and the radius and thats about it
idk where to really go from there
What topic is this and how do I solve it ?
moshill1:
any hints?
start with
z = k/t
use the info to determine k and hence the relation between z and t
This is what I thought when I was doing this, what do you mean by the relationship between z and t?
well you're starting with
z = k/t (from the inverse proportion)
you determined k to be 42
hence z = 42/t
moshill1:
$S \propto pq \implies S = kpq$
moshill1:
Is there a formula that I should be following for these?
I don't really understand what they mean by, jointly, inversely, and directly.
If y inversely varies with x, $ y \propto \frac{1}{x}$. If y directly varies with x, $y \propto x$. Jointly means the x would be multiple variables.
moshill1:
@viscid thistle little rule of thumb for you 🙂
I'm starting to understand it a bit more now after doing a few questions
good
Ex: y varies jointly with g
I think
y = kg, is this wrong?
that's direct variation, right?
ok
I was doing this problem and thought
that was the way to answer it, and got stumped because I thought that's what the answer was
for this
ye
Ik wording is slightly weird
yeah
cause we're use to "t squared"
yep
but in proportionality you just phrase it that way
I see
hey, I need help. lim sin(x) x--> (pi/2) = 0 ?
I was doing Khan Academy and this was one of the questions. I selected 0 and it marked as wrong
$ s \propto gt^2$
my professor barely went over this, she just skimmed over it a bit so I'm slightly confused and need to do some touch up on it
moshill1:
(which looks like distance but i digress)
@dawn karma sine starts at 0 and goes up to 1, then down to 0, to -1, up to 0
so the answer is 0?
i’m a little confused about this, when i plug it into the calculator it starts adding the 4 into the answer but all the examples my teacher has given me are about only messing with the denominator and setting it equal to 0
my teacher never really spoke about finding the domain of equations where the radical is in the numerator 
main things you need to be concerned about are
division by 0, sqrt of negatives, logs of non-positive numbers
we’re doing fairly basic stuff as of now (and our course has skipped over a lot because of corona) so we haven’t worked with logs
other than that yes i’m just confused on the procedures i would use to solve this kind of problem
well sqrt of negatives aren't defined over the reals,
so you'd also need to radicand: x-4 to be greater or equal to 0
ahhh okay
@solid juniper is this a test
well for the first one it would help if you completed the squares
write it in standard form
= 1?
ohh yeah forgot about = 1
okay so you can write it as (x-2)^2 / (sqrt3)^2 + (y+3)^2 / 2^2 = 1
Now you know what the length of the major and minor axes are
$ \frac{(x-2)^{2}}{3} + \frac{(y+3)^{2}}{4} = \frac{(x-2)^{2}}{(\sqrt{3})^{2}} + \frac{(y+3)^{2}}{2^{2}}$
Sup?:
wait i get the part on how to write it in that form but i tried to compute it and the result is dy/dx=-4x+8/3y+9. so i was wondering if thats the axis cause i thought it has to be a whole number
@solid juniper
yes?
How’d u get dy/dx ?
by doing (x-2)^2 / (sqrt3)^2 + (y+3)^2 / 2^2 = 1 on my calculator
Ur just trying to find the length of the major and minor axes right?
im actually just stuck at question 2 and 3
Ur just trying to find the length of the major and minor axes right?
@lapis sphinx im done now but i dont know if its right
Dy/dx is for derivatives; it’s calculus
2 and 3 are the only questions left
Alright I’ll take a look
(2,1) and (2,-5) major axis (2+sqrt3,-3) and (2-sqrt3,-3) minor axis
Alright
So for number 2
What was the equation u got from the information u had
U should’ve gotten this I believe
From there on, substitute in the values provided by the coordinate (3,3.2) into the equation for the ellipse
Then just solve for c
And ur done
U should’ve gotten c is 16 btw
Once u solve
Questions @solid juniper ?
Not sure abt number 3, haven’t done conics In a looooong time
so i would write in this from x^2/25+y^2/16?
=?
oh yeah = 1
ok
Do u know how I did it?
Idk. Haven’t done this in a while
Try to understand what I did for number 2
But I gtg
yea, np, just try to understand what I did lol
ok will do
i need help...
just post the question
a function cannot have multiple outputs for 1 input
so look at the given x and y values
if one x value corresponds to more than one y value, it is not a function
for each value of x there exists only one y for the relation to be a function
while in the case of mod x there is no such function
lim Delta x 0 (x+ Delta x)^ 2 -2(x+ Delta x)+1-(x^ 2 -2x+1) Delta x
Help
lim Delta x 0 (x+ Delta x)^ 2 -2(x+ Delta x)+1-(x^ 2 -2x+1) Delta x
Sorry that’s hard to read
Nvm I got it
Isn’t it just graphing?
cause sqrt(-98) = sqrt(-1)sqrt(98)
I don’t understand how this works
I don’t know the zeroes of the function so how can I create intervals
Would this be true bc 5 is in between 3 and 7
5 being between 3 and 7 doesn't necessarily mean f(5) has to be between f(3) and f(7)
Well x value wise if x values 3 and 7 are both producing positive y outputs wouldn’t 5 which is between them also produce a positive output
Look at this function and take a look at f(-5) and f(0); f(-5) = 2 and f(0)=7 does that mean that f(-3) must be positive?
Sometimes it helps to try to visualize a contradiction
or a proof
Oh so just because it is in between two x values that produce a positive output doesn’t necessarily mean it will for sure
Unless we actually see the whole function and can prove it
yup 😄
Thanks I appreciate it
No problem, I'm very glad I could help! 🙂
why is it not 1.3*140
try 140/.7
whats the answer
can some explain to me how to write 1x +2x +3x +4x in sigma notation?
Note that all four factors in the sum have an $x$ and a positive integer between 1 and 4. So you can let $n=1,2,3,4$ and write it as
$$\sum_{n=1}^4 nx = 1x+2x+3x+4x$$
derivada.schwarziana:
can someone help me with this limit
i cannot figure out how this works
i cant get it to a probability and my math teacher is on vacation
so confused lol
honestly hate learning math in online school his "notes" were just setting the problem up and not doing anything
you should be able to form 2 equations from the given info
how so?
actually can anyone reccommend somewhere i can learn about these types of problems?
Got a probability question I'm having trouble wrapping my head around.
In a shipment of 30 total computers, 3 of which are defective, what's the probability of picking a sample of 6 computers with 2 defective computers in it?
Is 3C2/30C6 the correct answer? Or am I missing something?
It seems like that wouldn't scale well for larger amounts of defective computers. For instance, the chance of choosing 2 computers out of a set of 30 all defective should be 0, but that formula would give 30C2/30C6, which isn't 0.
How would one calculate that without having access to that calculator?
sure
you can start with the easy one @viscid thistle
check out along the y axis, where x=0
if you plug in that x=0 to your equation
what do you get, and what does it have to equal?
exponent laws.
power of 2/3 to each side
@loud marsh basically what @uncut mulch said, hope it helps :)
fr
yessir
Hey anyone mind helping me out with some graph stuff
its a curved graph, distance time
ive done the equation and gotten answer but idk how to put it into a graph
<@&286206848099549185> 👋
@valid lichen whats the equation?
So i figured out that its going linear from 0,0 to y=25.2 x=0.84
and then it starts curving
with -5.11
until it reaches x=6.72 y=113.4
idk how to put this into a graph
im stuck here idk what to do
Eh i honestly confuse myself now
with -5.11
@valid lichen is this the gradient?
So basically the problem was
car goes 30meter per second, and then it starts breaking after 0.84seconds with -5.11meter/second^2
ive worked out that it stops at 113.4meters
6.72seconds
and you're graphing the distance-time graph?
yes
how long did the car travel 30m/s for ?
and it stops breaking at 6.72s, 113.4 meter?
yep
it stands still at that moment
it breaks for 5.88seconds
and travels 88.2meters
whilst breaking
this maybe explains it better, i made a velocity time graph
is stracka area haha
which is 88.2
could someone explain how they simplified this
i think i know what happened but i forget what its called when you multiply CONJUGATE
i think i just remembered
@valid lichen the distance time graph will look something like this
not that i know of
@loud marsh
logx(27) = 3/2 is basically saying
x^(3/2) = 27.
we can further simplify this to
sqrt(x^3) = 27
square both sides
x^3 = 729
cuberoot both sides
x = 9
@viscid thistle imagine anything over 0 as infinity. (for this situation)
using this we know that at x = -3/2, the denominator is 0. and at x = 4 the denominator is also 0.
you then make a quadratic out of that.
need more help?
🪵
what's the differential equation of 2x?
the what?
Svet L'octogone:
In that case it is 2
21 Sausage:
i need to subtract the two
consider factorising the denominator of the fraction on the left
$\frac{2x-1}{(x-2)(x+1)}-\frac{1}{x-2}$
LCD: (x-2)(x+1)
21 Sausage:
what do i do next
express it such that you have two fractions with the same denominator
i.e pretty much the same process as combining 1/2 + 1/4
numerator looks off
what is wrong with it
how'd you get it?
so the 2x-1 part already had the LCD in its original denominator so i did not multiply anything with the 2x-1
oh wait
21 Sausage:
correct?
stray parentheses but other than that, looks ok
21 Sausage:
ramonov:
which does simplify to 1/(x+1) and you should make a note that its for x \neq 2
yes yes but my teacher was not looking for excluded value
values
and i was too lazy to put the parentheses
i usually recommend that you state restrictions regardless if they are no longer implied in your final expression
will do
i cant seem to find what im doing wrong here
ill send pictures of my work
give me like 5 minutes i need to try to finish the problem and upload the pictures
wait nvm
switched up the signs of the factored form of x^2-x-12
with what exactly?
Isn’t this basically the same? Should I get my instructor to view it and see if he can change my grade(s)
can you show more context
It was just the answer, I put in as “1” but it marked it as wrong and the correct one was supposed to be “x=1”
Isn’t that basically the same?
@weary wing not really, asymptotes can be parallel to the x or y axis (i.e. horizontal or vertical). if you do not specify it’s x=1, it could mean y=1, which is wrong. plus just the number 1 doesn’t really mean anything, is it an x-intercept? the gradient at one point? hope it helps!
Ah okay, thanks for clarification! I’ll make sure not to mess that up.
no worries :)
Im lost on how to solve this
Trying different things and getting different solutions, none seems to be working.
@quaint mason you’re not doing this by hand right
like, without a calculator
i have a calculator
a
for a, you plug in 3 into n(t) then plug in the answer into s(t)
lemme use my calculator and see what i get
thats what i did
okay
wait so
u plugged 3 in for t right? for time
and then plug into other equation as n
yes
plugged it into n(t) first then plug it into s(n), don’t worry about the variables, just plug the number in
nope you don’t have to
ah repeat process
?
you gotta multiply what u get by n(2)
multiply what
s(n(2)) x n(2)
actually
the question said average, even though they didn’t say “average annual earnings per person”, i’m guessing they mean the same thing?
if so, then it’s just s(n(2))
if its asking for total earning, then it’d be s(n(2)) x n(2)
which one did you try?
ahh ok
@quaint mason oh no i forgot about this question im sorry oops
Nah its all gud haha
@quaint mason wait so how did u get it ?
Its the same step, my calculation was off thats all
Btw are u gud with graphs
f(g(x))
composite functions
Cuz im lost and tryna ask for help but apparently other peeps r lost too
nope
that is the entire problem
unfortunately, its estimating and ive tried every number so far that seems logical
someone recommended me findin the function itself but idk how i would be able to
ah i would recommend finding the fucntion itself
i found it
ok so
f(x) would be a cubic right ?
y=ae^x
have u learnt euler's number?
that one
yup the little e
i have
ok lets look at g(x) first
do u know how the basic exponential graph looks like?
y=e^x
yes
yes and its also raised up by 4
yup
hmm
i know what you're trying to say
but its called a dilation not translation, do u agree?
yeah
you know the y intercept is (0,5), u plug the values in and solve for a
yup!
ok g(x) = 5e^-x
now find f(x) right?
yup
well quadratic functions?
yes
do u know how to factorise a quadratic function?
to make the function look like this basically y=(x-a)(x-b)
yea
a and b represent the root of the function, i.e. the x-intercepts or where the graph cuts the x-axis
so whenever it crosses the x intercept?
because if you let y=0 to solve for the x-intercept, (x-a) = 0 or (x-b) = 0 because Null Factor Law
whenever it crosses the x-axis
Null Factor Law?
ahh ok, ill explain that later, but for now, just know that a and b is where the graph cuts the x axis
ok
c is if it crosses the 3rd time?
either one of a or b or c will equal to where f(x) cuts the x-axis (you'll have to approximate from the graph given)
mm
yes
but that wouldnt be possible for a quadratic right? because the maximum number of times a quadratic function can cut the x-axis is 2 times (since x can only equal to a maximum of two values in a quadratic)
therefore it has to be a cubic or a higher degree polynomial
(pls tell me if its confusing cuz idk how much u know hahah)
thats good
so lets say f(x) cuts the x-axis at (3.3,0)
do you know what f(x) will look like? (its not gonna be the final answer so theres still gonna be some variables in it)
either one of a or b or c will equal to where f(x) cuts the x-axis (you'll have to approximate from the graph given)
@peak path
thats a good question, i was bout to get to that ahah
at x=0, its a turning point, do u agree ?
have u learnt about turning points?
turning point?
ah yes
when there's a turning point at the x-axis, it basically means the graph "cuts the x-axis twice at the point"
twice? so ur saying a and b are both 0 and c would be 3.3
in simpler words, when the graph cuts the x- axis at point c, it will looks like (x-c)
when there is a turning point at the x-axis at point c, it will look like (x-c)^2
in this case, since c=0, its just x^2
sorry my wifi is slow rn
@quaint mason all good :)
x times x
x times x
@quaint mason ?
to get x^2
it should be -(x^2)(x-3.3)
do u know why there's a negative sign?
sounds good
i don't really know where this goes
but i was never taught combinatorics or anything like that
how do you solve this problem
my initial intuition was 5/6 * 4/5 so i got the right answer by being numerically close
but wth am i actually supposed to do here
<@&286206848099549185>
tfw self ping
5!
yes!
@quaint mason yup
@fleet yew if there are 3 people sitting in a row, how many different ways can they sit? do u know this? :)
@peak path sorry for late reply
i do know about factorials
and to answer your question, that would be 3 starting people multiplied by 2 people following
so 3!
that problem is easy intuitively but i just don't know enough to solve that kind of problem analytically
yeah that's what i meant
there are two type of questions, arrangement of objects in a row and arrangement of objects in a circle
for row questions, its n! , n=number of objects
for circle questions, its (n-1)!
unique?
for the same n value, circle would have less possible combinations because its a circle and the two ends are joined up
unique?
@fleet yew ?
the unique number of arrangements
like let's say you're in a circle
is ABCDEF different from BCDEFA
@peak path
?
<@&286206848099549185> sorry for ping but anyone else willing to explain?
let Kenji = K and Mary = M and the remaining 4 people b A B C D
K and M cant be together
so the probability is (5! - number of ways that K and M are sitting together) / 5!
i would write it out
K and M is considered a group now
6 people now technically becomes 5 people
sorry if i keep going on and off im in a class lol
it's alright lol, better than nothing
(5-1)! 2! is how many possible arrangements there are if K and M will sit together
2! is because there are 2 people in the bracket, so 2!
right because it could be (K,M) or (M,K)
yes
4! 2! = 48
(5! - 48) / 5! will get u the answer
so the probability is (5! - number of ways that K and M are sitting together) / 5!
@peak path
dude thanks so much
i was clueless going into this lol
they don't teach this shit at schools but expect you to know it on the ACT
I was never taught about binomial coefficients or factorials or any of that stuff
@peak path are you in HS or college?
when are you supposed to learn this
i should've taken stats lol
last year of high school
i leant it last year
which is yr 11
which is sophomore ?? idek
ahh its junior
what was the class called
yeah that's not really a specific course here
like do you know what the unit was called
probability
ok yeah that makes sense
i never really learned about probability asides from the basic multiplying
like P(a+b) = P(a) * P(b)
here in america our math classes are calculus focused
does anybody know how to solve pythag identities
c^2 = a^2 + b^2?
for this one you need a very basic proof
and then the other identities like cot^2 + 1 = sec^2 etc follow naturally
k im currently on this type of question
draw a right triangle with some arbitrary angle theta
in quadrant 1 of the unit circle
@inland igloo have u learnt the unit circle
yes
so u know cos is x and sin is y ?
yes
but that has nothing to do with the unit circle as im
i would prove the identities
to prove it ?
do u know what i did in the photo ?
OHH
not the one im having trouble with




