#precalculus

1 messages · Page 266 of 1

echo pelican
#

Youre looking at sec(4x+3)

#

So set 4x+3 = pi/2 * k where k is odd

shadow plaza
#

The solution that they gave is right only for k=4j where j is necessarily odd. That is what i am saying. You said it's valid only when k is odd

echo pelican
#

Youre solving for x not for the values on the unit circle that make sec undefined

#

Looking for specific values of x aaccording to this function

shadow plaza
#

Oww. Mb. I didn't consider the 4.

#

Sorry

echo pelican
#

Np

#

I confused myself looking at it lol

shadow plaza
#

Lol. No you're right. It is only valid when k is odd

#

Actually you know what, we're both doing it wrong

#

We should consider kπ+π/2 and kπ+3π/2 as the two cases to get the answer

lean tusk
#

I'm back - my bad, I didn't fully explain what the problem is asking for: here's everything it asks for (only looking at domain), also this is a different function this time

remote raptor
#

can someone please explain how im wrong here

sick steppe
#

sin is opposite on hypotenuse

#

in this case y/r

#

sin(theta) = y only on the unit circle

#

@remote raptor ^

arctic kestrel
#

idk how to do this???

sick steppe
#

(R-C)(x) = R(x) - C(x)

arctic kestrel
#

oooooo

slate vessel
#

does anyone know what happened in this

sick steppe
#

1/(1/cos) is cos

arctic kestrel
#

@sick steppe

#

i don't understand this?

#

What I understand is that i'm supposed to take 7 from g and replace it with f(g(7))

sick steppe
#

what's g(7)?

arctic kestrel
#

1

sick steppe
#

ok so what's f(g(7)) if g(7)=1

arctic kestrel
#

uhh

#

-2??

sick steppe
#

yeah

arctic kestrel
#

holy shit

#

that's confusing

sick steppe
#

Not really lol

#

you just go from the inside out

arctic kestrel
#

okay okay what about this one

sick steppe
#

Just try the questions lol

arctic kestrel
#

i did

#

and what i thought about doing is

#

subtracting x+6squared

#

to isolate y

sick steppe
#

no...

arctic kestrel
#

then divide y^2 by y

sick steppe
#

you just read off the center and radius

arctic kestrel
#

oh?

#

It's hard to understand

slate vessel
#

1/(1/cos) is cos
@sick steppe then why domain of both are different

sick steppe
#

cause 1/cos dne if cos(x)=0

slate vessel
#

yes

#

then 1/(1/cos)≠cos

sick steppe
#

but 1/(1/cos) = 1/sec = cos

slate vessel
#

Then why domain are different

#

1/sec will give same domain as 1/(1/cos)

#

which both giving different domain from cos

#

1/(1/cos=0)=1/infinity

#

which doesn't exist

viscid thistle
#

huh? $\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\cos(0)}}=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{1}}=1$

obsidian monolithBOT
slate vessel
#

Cos=0*

#

not cos0

viscid thistle
#

i don't understand you at all

slate vessel
#

wait

viscid thistle
#

cos(x)=0 has x=pi/2

#

as a sol

slate vessel
#

nono, I am asking in this here, cos≠0

#

why is it giving different domain

viscid thistle
#

what the fuck is that $\neq$, which 2 things you say have different domain?

obsidian monolithBOT
slate vessel
#

1/sec=1/(1/cos)

#

Domain will not contain odd multiples of pi/2

#

but

#

1/(1/cos)=cos

#

whose domain is R

#

this is where I am confusing

#

because it's the same expression but different domain

charred bridge
#

cos x?

#

what how does that bot work

#

looks pretty cool

uncut mulch
#

domain restrictions depend on your original expression

#

simplest case x/x

viscid thistle
#

^

#

we were told to make this shape using parametrics

#

i don't really know where to start

#

the rules are that the pattern should loop

#

meaning that t can be infinity and it'll still be a triangle

viscid thistle
#

nvm did it

#

woohoo

autumn marsh
#

@viscid thistle ask here

viscid thistle
#

Anyone know this @here

#

<@&286206848099549185>

hearty robin
#

<@&286206848099549185>

viscid thistle
#

What ?

hearty robin
#

@viscid thistle

viscid thistle
#

?

halcyon edge
#

How can i form a DE from this

willow bear
#

DE?

halcyon edge
#

Differential eq

willow bear
#

differentiate wrt x to get 1/a + y'/b = 0 and then y' = -b/a i guess

#

with initial condition y(0) = b

halcyon edge
#

Yep thanks

halcyon edge
#

Why we are multiplying the xdy-ydx/x^2 part?

stuck lark
#

chain rule

halcyon edge
#

@stuck lark i see

viscid thistle
#

I need help with fundamental identities

viscid thistle
#

@viscid thistle still wondering? If so, do you have an specific problem you are stuck with

graceful dagger
#

Will anyone help me before my exams for calculus?

viscid thistle
#

@viscid thistle still wondering

#

can you help me?

#

do you have an specific problem you are stuck with?

#

none I just dont know how to solve like I am so confused

fossil crownBOT
#
Rule 1

The help channels are solely for help with math, so feel free to post your question. Asking whether you can ask a question or if anyone knows about some specific topic is unnecessary, so please try to avoid questions of that nature.

viscid thistle
#

"fundamental identities" is very general

#

like this problem idk how to slove it

#

Do you have to prove it or solve for theta

#

What does your book tell you to do

#

prove it

#

like the rule it said I should start of with the complicated side which is the left right?

#

In 3 for example it does not really matter but generally yes

#

In 3, consider multiplying on num and den by something

#

to like reciprocal the identity

sand harbor
#

yrs

#

yes

viscid thistle
#

"reciprocal the identity" is vague

lime bolt
#

you can multply both sides by cos*(1+sin) and u get the pythagorean identity

viscid thistle
#

.........

lime bolt
#

?

viscid thistle
#

The fact that you entered and said something that i wanted him to think in order to create intuition.

#

Sigh

#

yeah he shouldnt have said that

#

like its about learning not giving me the answer

lime bolt
#

hmm

viscid thistle
#

KANE, YOU WERE GIVEN THE LAST CHANCE.

#

It's NOT obvious for them

#

Kane

#

dont

#

thats not learning

lime bolt
#

no the guy said im not allowed to call things trivial

#

i didnt do that

viscid thistle
#

I'll leave this to a mod to decide over you.

#

Obvious is even worse than trivial

#

It's like changing with a synonym

lime bolt
#

ok ill note that for the future

viscid thistle
#

The thing is that you should've noted that in the previous 4 times.

lime bolt
#

ok

viscid thistle
#

cosθ/1+sin θ

#

cosθ
1+sin θ

#

nvm I just finished this

hasty wolf
#

hmm
@lime bolt thonk

#

The point isn't "don't use this specific word". It's the overall idea of showing off that something is "easy" for you instead of being helpful.

lime bolt
#

i see

hasty wolf
#

So yeah. I did warn you.

viscid thistle
#

did i do this correctly

sick steppe
#

at the x^2(x^2+1) line is where it goes wrong algebraically

viscid thistle
#

oh.....

sick steppe
#

cause x^2 != -2 necessarily

#

the zero product property is only for 0

viscid thistle
#

ahhh ok ok gotcha

#

ty

sick steppe
#

ye

patent lance
#

Sorry for bad quality

#

Snipping tool like broke

#

Once I plug in 2+h for the equation I don't know what to do

echo pelican
#

You have to expand out the whole f(2+h)

#

And see if you can cancel terms from there

#

So e.g. the first term there would be

10*(2+h)^2

#

Expand that out using foil/distributive prooperty

#

And see what can be canceled out by other terms that appear

#

That would be my guess for what they want you to do

patent lance
#

Yeah gotcha

#

So you get (10h^2+36h+44)-44/h

#

Then you'd just take out the h yeah?

#

And get 10h+36

echo pelican
#

Yes if you did the steps correctly so far that works

patent lance
#

Alright neat ty

echo pelican
#

Based on how they wrote the answer i would assume you must be able to pull an h out of the top

patent lance
#

Yeah

#

But would you just do 6-7x>= 0?

#

To start off

#

Or would you distribute the 5

#

I got x<=6/7 and I'm not super sure if I did it right

#

And then after that I'm not sure how to write that as interval notation

echo pelican
#

No need to distribute the 5

#

The domain issues are all caused within the radical

#

So what you did is correct

#

You need all cases where the inside is greater than or equal to 0

patent lance
#

So interval would be (-oo,6/7]

#

Then I think

#

Appreciate all your help btw

echo pelican
#

Yes i that should do it believe

#

Yw

patent lance
#

I just have no clue what to do for this one

echo pelican
#

Ok so all those pieces there describe one function

#

Look at the leftmost piece

#

It seems that when x is between -5 and -3

#

The way the function behaves is that it takes on a constant value of y=-3

#

You can describe either by inequality or interval which x values give the different y values

#

This one is called piecewise because the function behaves a certain way and then suddenly jumps to a different "piece" that behaves differently

patent lance
#

So for 2nd one itd be (-3,2]

#

?

echo pelican
#

The end point being dotted or open tells you if you include the endpoints

#

Yes exactly

patent lance
#

Yeah alright think I got it ty again

echo pelican
#

Yw

patent lance
#

This would be correct yeah?

#

Bit confused since two points are on each other

uncut mulch
#

close

#

you didn't graph the last piece properly

patent lance
#

It should be an open point right

#

But that'd interfere with the closed one with the other graph is my trouble

#

Unless I just did something else wrong as well which is possible

uncut mulch
#

open doesn't really interfere with closed

#

the issue is your graph isn't defined for x in (1,2]

echo pelican
#

The lower piece is closed at 1 whoch means it includes 1

#

The upper piece is open at 1 meaning that it doesnt quite reach 1

#

You can imagine that the open 1 on top is picking up exactly where the closed 1 came to a halt

patent lance
#

Oh ok

#

Or did I write inflection points wring5

#

Wrong

worthy summit
#

@everyone can someone remind me how to find asymptotes of a rational expression?

#

vertical

#

x^2-64/8x-64

void thorn
#

8x-64=0

patent lance
#

would ths be correct

pastel cloud
#

(x^2 - x) has to be less than or = 12

#

so (x^2 - x - 12) has to be less than or = 0

#

(x-4)(x+3) is less than or = 0

pastel cloud
#

i think b = 4 because 4^2 - 4 = 12 which is included in the domain

quick mirage
#

f * g = f(g(x)) = f(x^2 - x) = sqrt(12 - (x^2 - x))
= sqrt(-x^2 + x + 12)
= sqrt((-x+4)(x+3))

-x+4 >= 0
-x >= -4
x <= 4

x+3 >= 0
x >= -3

-3 <= x <= 4

Range = |-3, 4|

fiery wren
naive prism
#

im super confused

viscid thistle
#

first make a triangle with those points

#

find the y = mx + b equation that goes through b and c

#

then find the line perpendicular to that, that goes through A

#

then find the distance between A, and the intersection between the two lines

#

there's prob some formula for that actually

#

@naive prism

junior sable
#

Isn't 1/(square root of 2/2) 2/(square root of 2)? i don't get it

elder charm
#

uhh, no?

#

$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$

#

but $\frac{1}{\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}} = \sqrt{2}$

obsidian monolithBOT
elder charm
#

proof: multiply numerator and denominator by $\sqrt{2}$ in both cases.

obsidian monolithBOT
junior sable
#

ok ty

pastel cloud
#

I guess I know x+2 is a factor I could just use remainder theorem to find m ?

#

0 = 14(-2)^2 + m(-2) - 38

#

solve for m, and then use another method to find the rest of the factors?

#

14x^2 +9x-38 doesn't looks like it factors easily .. would I use polynomial division or quadratic formula after this?

#

I guess I could just graph it in my calculator to find the zeros

sick steppe
#

@pastel cloud you're right that 0 = 14(-2)^2 -2m -38, so you can get m easily

#

So you use the fact that the HA is y=-2/7 and the fact that the degree of the numerator = degree of the denominator

#

to find k ^

pastel cloud
#

oh I know how to get K, but I'm told to also find the other vertical asymptotes if there are any

sick steppe
#

The question you posted doesnt have anything to do with finding the other VA that I can see

pastel cloud
#

Ya I just have the questio bit cut out my bad

#

wait no it should be ther

sick steppe
#

Nope your pic is only find k and m

pastel cloud
#

it says in brackets (note there may be other vertical asymptotes)

sick steppe
#

That's just a note

#

it doesnt say: Find the vertical asymptotes

pastel cloud
#

oh lmao

sick steppe
#

yeah

#

but you can find the other VA as 14x^2 + 9x -38 is factorable

#

since b^2-4ac > 0

pastel cloud
#

I forgot this rule

#

I have a test coming up in 30 minutes

sick steppe
#

oof

pastel cloud
#

ill be fine... i think

#

im comfortable with factor theorem and remainder theorem, reading graphs, knowing asymptotes, etc

#

u helped me the other day so thanks for that.

steel sequoia
#

Found the maximum on a graph but it gave me long decimal values. How do I instead see it as a fraction?

viscid thistle
#

Can i see your number

steel sequoia
#

For X I have -0.7320494 and Y is 2.5980762 so it's not rounding errors

#

I'm graphing 1/4(x-1)(x-4)(x+2)

#

And need the fractional values for the min and max

#

Unless they come out whole

sick steppe
#

@steel sequoia d/dx the function then quad formula is the only way you'll get exact answers

pastel cloud
#

Just finished my test... I think i did well

#

took longer than it should have, but I still had some spare time to go over my answers thoroughly.

nova ice
#

So I'm currently trying to precalculus. I wanted to know what you people thought would be the best sites and books to learn it

sick steppe
#

firstly: "Trying to precalculus"

#

2ndly: Khan Academy or Professor Leonard on Youtube

nova ice
#

Thank you

naive prism
#

im so confused on how you do this

#

i so far found the center of the circle and the radius and thats about it

#

idk where to really go from there

viscid thistle
sick steppe
#

Proportionality @viscid thistle

#

$z \propto \frac{1}{t} \implies z = \frac{k}{t}$

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
uncut mulch
#

start with
z = k/t
use the info to determine k and hence the relation between z and t

viscid thistle
#

This is what I thought when I was doing this, what do you mean by the relationship between z and t?

uncut mulch
#

well you're starting with
z = k/t (from the inverse proportion)
you determined k to be 42
hence z = 42/t

viscid thistle
#

oh

#

I see

viscid thistle
#

where did I go wrong with this one?

sick steppe
#

$S \propto pq$

#

if it'd load

obsidian monolithBOT
sick steppe
#

$S \propto pq \implies S = kpq$

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
#

Is there a formula that I should be following for these?

#

I don't really understand what they mean by, jointly, inversely, and directly.

sick steppe
#

If y inversely varies with x, $ y \propto \frac{1}{x}$. If y directly varies with x, $y \propto x$. Jointly means the x would be multiple variables.

obsidian monolithBOT
sick steppe
#

@viscid thistle little rule of thumb for you 🙂

viscid thistle
#

I'm starting to understand it a bit more now after doing a few questions

sick steppe
#

good

viscid thistle
#

Ex: y varies jointly with g
I think
y = kg, is this wrong?

#

that's direct variation, right?

sick steppe
#

in that case you wouldnt use jointly, as there's only g

#

but you're right it's y =kg

viscid thistle
#

ok

#

I was doing this problem and thought

#

that was the way to answer it, and got stumped because I thought that's what the answer was

#

for this

sick steppe
#

"square of t"

#

not "square root of t"

viscid thistle
#

t^2

#

XD

sick steppe
#

ye

viscid thistle
#

fck man

#

hahaha

sick steppe
#

Ik wording is slightly weird

viscid thistle
#

yeah

sick steppe
#

cause we're use to "t squared"

viscid thistle
#

yep

sick steppe
#

but in proportionality you just phrase it that way

viscid thistle
#

I see

dawn karma
#

hey, I need help. lim sin(x) x--> (pi/2) = 0 ?
I was doing Khan Academy and this was one of the questions. I selected 0 and it marked as wrong

sick steppe
#

$ s \propto gt^2$

viscid thistle
#

my professor barely went over this, she just skimmed over it a bit so I'm slightly confused and need to do some touch up on it

obsidian monolithBOT
sick steppe
#

(which looks like distance but i digress)

#

@dawn karma sine starts at 0 and goes up to 1, then down to 0, to -1, up to 0

dawn karma
#

so the answer is 0?

viscid thistle
#

hi

#

i need halp

full rapids
#

i’m a little confused about this, when i plug it into the calculator it starts adding the 4 into the answer but all the examples my teacher has given me are about only messing with the denominator and setting it equal to 0

#

my teacher never really spoke about finding the domain of equations where the radical is in the numerator pepelaugh

uncut mulch
#

main things you need to be concerned about are
division by 0, sqrt of negatives, logs of non-positive numbers

full rapids
#

we’re doing fairly basic stuff as of now (and our course has skipped over a lot because of corona) so we haven’t worked with logs

#

other than that yes i’m just confused on the procedures i would use to solve this kind of problem

uncut mulch
#

well sqrt of negatives aren't defined over the reals,
so you'd also need to radicand: x-4 to be greater or equal to 0

full rapids
#

ahhh okay

solid juniper
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

anyone?

lilac pier
#

@solid juniper is this a test

solid juniper
#

its more like an assignment

#

@lilac pier

lilac pier
#

well for the first one it would help if you completed the squares

#

write it in standard form

solid juniper
#

ok wait

#

its (x-2)^2/3 + (y+3)^2/4 = 1

#

@lilac pier

lilac pier
#

= 1?

solid juniper
#

ohh yeah forgot about = 1

lilac pier
#

okay so you can write it as (x-2)^2 / (sqrt3)^2 + (y+3)^2 / 2^2 = 1

#

Now you know what the length of the major and minor axes are

solid juniper
#

wait what?

#

i dont get it

lilac pier
#

$ \frac{(x-2)^{2}}{3} + \frac{(y+3)^{2}}{4} = \frac{(x-2)^{2}}{(\sqrt{3})^{2}} + \frac{(y+3)^{2}}{2^{2}}$

obsidian monolithBOT
solid juniper
#

wait i get the part on how to write it in that form but i tried to compute it and the result is dy/dx=-4x+8/3y+9. so i was wondering if thats the axis cause i thought it has to be a whole number

lilac pier
#

I don't know what you're doing with dy/dx

#

sorry

lapis sphinx
#

@solid juniper

solid juniper
#

yes?

lapis sphinx
#

How’d u get dy/dx ?

solid juniper
#

by doing (x-2)^2 / (sqrt3)^2 + (y+3)^2 / 2^2 = 1 on my calculator

lapis sphinx
#

Ur just trying to find the length of the major and minor axes right?

solid juniper
#

im actually just stuck at question 2 and 3

#

Ur just trying to find the length of the major and minor axes right?
@lapis sphinx im done now but i dont know if its right

lapis sphinx
#

Dy/dx is for derivatives; it’s calculus

solid juniper
#

2 and 3 are the only questions left

lapis sphinx
#

Alright I’ll take a look

solid juniper
#

(2,1) and (2,-5) major axis (2+sqrt3,-3) and (2-sqrt3,-3) minor axis

lapis sphinx
#

Alright

#

So for number 2

#

What was the equation u got from the information u had

#

U should’ve gotten this I believe

#

From there on, substitute in the values provided by the coordinate (3,3.2) into the equation for the ellipse

#

Then just solve for c

#

And ur done

#

U should’ve gotten c is 16 btw

#

Once u solve

#

Questions @solid juniper ?

#

Not sure abt number 3, haven’t done conics In a looooong time

solid juniper
#

so i would write in this from x^2/25+y^2/16?

lapis sphinx
#

=?

solid juniper
#

oh yeah = 1

lapis sphinx
#

Yea

#

Test the equation out

#

See if everything fits

solid juniper
#

ok

lapis sphinx
#

Do u know how I did it?

solid juniper
#

nope

#

whats for no. 3 btw?

#

thats the only missing answer and im donee

lapis sphinx
#

Idk. Haven’t done this in a while

#

Try to understand what I did for number 2

#

But I gtg

solid juniper
#

oh

#

ok

#

bye and thank you

lapis sphinx
#

yea, np, just try to understand what I did lol

solid juniper
#

ok will do

plain turtle
#

i need help...

full pagoda
#

just post the question

plain turtle
#

how can i tell if it is a function?

full pagoda
#

a function cannot have multiple outputs for 1 input

#

so look at the given x and y values

#

if one x value corresponds to more than one y value, it is not a function

slate vessel
#

for each value of x there exists only one y for the relation to be a function

viscid thistle
#

while in the case of mod x there is no such function

spark veldt
#

lim Delta x 0 (x+ Delta x)^ 2 -2(x+ Delta x)+1-(x^ 2 -2x+1) Delta x
Help

#

lim Delta x 0 (x+ Delta x)^ 2 -2(x+ Delta x)+1-(x^ 2 -2x+1) Delta x

#

Nvm I got it

topaz obsidian
#

Need help with part 2

#

Anyone able to help?

lapis sphinx
#

Isn’t it just graphing?

arctic kestrel
#

why is this i, i, 7i, ?

sick steppe
#

cause sqrt(-98) = sqrt(-1)sqrt(98)

arctic kestrel
#

yeah so wouldn't it be

#

9.9i

#

approximately

sick steppe
#

No

#

the question leaves sqrt(98) as sqrt(98)

#

they want the exact answer

cobalt storm
#

I don’t understand how this works

#

I don’t know the zeroes of the function so how can I create intervals

#

Would this be true bc 5 is in between 3 and 7

latent siren
#

5 being between 3 and 7 doesn't necessarily mean f(5) has to be between f(3) and f(7)

cobalt storm
#

Well x value wise if x values 3 and 7 are both producing positive y outputs wouldn’t 5 which is between them also produce a positive output

latent siren
#

Sometimes it helps to try to visualize a contradiction

#

or a proof

cobalt storm
#

Oh so just because it is in between two x values that produce a positive output doesn’t necessarily mean it will for sure

#

Unless we actually see the whole function and can prove it

latent siren
#

yup 😄

cobalt storm
#

Thanks I appreciate it

latent siren
#

No problem, I'm very glad I could help! 🙂

sick seal
astral mantle
#

1.3*140 = 182

sick seal
#

well yeah

#

but thats wrong

astral mantle
#

try 140/.7

sick seal
#

huzzah

#

thats whats up

daring yarrow
#

x = original price
x*0.70=140
==> x = 140/0.70

#

@sick seal

sick seal
#

aaah

#

thanks

waxen nymph
#

whats the answer

toxic karma
#

can some explain to me how to write 1x +2x +3x +4x in sigma notation?

half star
#

Note that all four factors in the sum have an $x$ and a positive integer between 1 and 4. So you can let $n=1,2,3,4$ and write it as
$$\sum_{n=1}^4 nx = 1x+2x+3x+4x$$

obsidian monolithBOT
toxic karma
#

ohhhhhhhhhh

#

thx

waxen nymph
#

can someone help me with this limit

nimble knoll
waxen nymph
#

i'd really apreciate it

toxic karma
#

@nimble knoll start off by inverting g(x) over the line y=x

#

reflecting*

nimble knoll
#

ok

#

what next

toxic karma
#

then

#

find the (4,0)

#

mark it

#

and nowshoot

#

i messed up

nimble knoll
#

i think it’s 1

#

am i right?

#

because i’m kinda scared i messed up somewhere

shut glade
#

i cannot figure out how this works

#

i cant get it to a probability and my math teacher is on vacation

#

so confused lol

#

honestly hate learning math in online school his "notes" were just setting the problem up and not doing anything

serene heath
#

you should be able to form 2 equations from the given info

shut glade
#

how so?

#

actually can anyone reccommend somewhere i can learn about these types of problems?

rich saddle
#

Got a probability question I'm having trouble wrapping my head around.
In a shipment of 30 total computers, 3 of which are defective, what's the probability of picking a sample of 6 computers with 2 defective computers in it?

Is 3C2/30C6 the correct answer? Or am I missing something?

#

It seems like that wouldn't scale well for larger amounts of defective computers. For instance, the chance of choosing 2 computers out of a set of 30 all defective should be 0, but that formula would give 30C2/30C6, which isn't 0.

patent beacon
#

@rich saddle
This is the hypergeometric distribution

rich saddle
#

How would one calculate that without having access to that calculator?

viscid thistle
#

Anyone here to help me out with a Rational Equation question

proud raven
#

sure

#

you can start with the easy one @viscid thistle

#

check out along the y axis, where x=0

#

if you plug in that x=0 to your equation

#

what do you get, and what does it have to equal?

loud marsh
#

i get that its x^(3/2) = 27 but how do you find x

uncut mulch
#

exponent laws.
power of 2/3 to each side

peak path
#

@loud marsh basically what @uncut mulch said, hope it helps :)

loud marsh
#

THANK YOU @peak path GWaobloChildPepeCry

#

online gr 12 got me fucked up

peak path
#

@loud marsh YOU'RE WELCOME

#

lol same class of 2020 gang

loud marsh
#

fr

peak path
#

yessir

valid lichen
#

Hey anyone mind helping me out with some graph stuff

#

its a curved graph, distance time

#

ive done the equation and gotten answer but idk how to put it into a graph

#

<@&286206848099549185> 👋

peak path
#

@valid lichen whats the equation?

valid lichen
#

So i figured out that its going linear from 0,0 to y=25.2 x=0.84

#

and then it starts curving

#

with -5.11

#

until it reaches x=6.72 y=113.4

#

idk how to put this into a graph

#

im stuck here idk what to do

#

Eh i honestly confuse myself now

peak path
#

with -5.11
@valid lichen is this the gradient?

valid lichen
#

So basically the problem was

#

car goes 30meter per second, and then it starts breaking after 0.84seconds with -5.11meter/second^2

#

ive worked out that it stops at 113.4meters

#

6.72seconds

peak path
#

and you're graphing the distance-time graph?

valid lichen
#

yes

peak path
#

how long did the car travel 30m/s for ?

valid lichen
#

0.84seconds

#

and traveled 25.2meters

#

and then it started breaking with -5.11m/s^2

peak path
#

and it stops breaking at 6.72s, 113.4 meter?

valid lichen
#

yep

#

it stands still at that moment

#

it breaks for 5.88seconds

#

and travels 88.2meters

#

whilst breaking

#

this maybe explains it better, i made a velocity time graph

peak path
#

is stracka area haha

valid lichen
#

sträcka is distance

#

^^

peak path
#

ahh okay

#

do u know the area of the blue triangle ?

valid lichen
#

yes

#

(5.88*30)/2

peak path
#

which is 88.2

valid lichen
#

yes

#

and the other is 25.2m

#

total 113.4

radiant ibex
#

could someone explain how they simplified this

#

i think i know what happened but i forget what its called when you multiply CONJUGATE

#

i think i just remembered

peak path
#

@valid lichen the distance time graph will look something like this

valid lichen
#

how can i put this into a graph maker catThink

#

is there an equation?

peak path
#

not that i know of

viscid thistle
#

@loud marsh
logx(27) = 3/2 is basically saying
x^(3/2) = 27.
we can further simplify this to
sqrt(x^3) = 27
square both sides
x^3 = 729
cuberoot both sides
x = 9

#

@viscid thistle imagine anything over 0 as infinity. (for this situation)
using this we know that at x = -3/2, the denominator is 0. and at x = 4 the denominator is also 0.
you then make a quadratic out of that.
need more help?

uncut mulch
#

🪵

quartz edge
#

what's the differential equation of 2x?

willow bear
#

the what?

obsidian monolithBOT
night fiber
#

In that case it is 2

winged shell
#

can someone help me with this question

#

$\frac{2x-1}{x^{2}-x-2}-\frac{1}{x-2}$

obsidian monolithBOT
winged shell
#

i need to subtract the two

uncut mulch
#

consider factorising the denominator of the fraction on the left

winged shell
#

$\frac{2x-1}{(x-2)(x+1)}-\frac{1}{x-2}$
LCD: (x-2)(x+1)

obsidian monolithBOT
winged shell
#

what do i do next

uncut mulch
#

express it such that you have two fractions with the same denominator

#

i.e pretty much the same process as combining 1/2 + 1/4

winged shell
#

$\frac{2x-1-(1(x+1)}{(x-2)(x+1)}$

#

simplify top?

#

@uncut mulch

uncut mulch
#

numerator looks off

winged shell
#

what is wrong with it

uncut mulch
#

how'd you get it?

winged shell
#

so the 2x-1 part already had the LCD in its original denominator so i did not multiply anything with the 2x-1

#

oh wait

obsidian monolithBOT
winged shell
#

correct?

uncut mulch
#

stray parentheses but other than that, looks ok

winged shell
#

ok ill simplify

#

$\frac{x-2}{x-2 *x+1}$

obsidian monolithBOT
winged shell
#

cross ou the x-2 and replace numerator with 1

#

and so 1/x+1?

uncut mulch
#

denominator looks completely fked now

#

$\frac{x-2}{(x-2)(x+1)}$

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

which does simplify to 1/(x+1) and you should make a note that its for x \neq 2

winged shell
#

yes yes but my teacher was not looking for excluded value

#

values

#

and i was too lazy to put the parentheses

uncut mulch
#

i usually recommend that you state restrictions regardless if they are no longer implied in your final expression

winged shell
#

will do

#

i cant seem to find what im doing wrong here

#

ill send pictures of my work

#

give me like 5 minutes i need to try to finish the problem and upload the pictures

#

wait nvm

#

switched up the signs of the factored form of x^2-x-12

verbal pebble
#

does anyone know how to solve this

final agate
#

hey i need help

#

real quick

sick steppe
#

with what exactly?

weary wing
#

Isn’t this basically the same? Should I get my instructor to view it and see if he can change my grade(s)

viscid thistle
#

can you show more context

weary wing
#

It was just the answer, I put in as “1” but it marked it as wrong and the correct one was supposed to be “x=1”

#

Isn’t that basically the same?

peak path
#

@weary wing not really, asymptotes can be parallel to the x or y axis (i.e. horizontal or vertical). if you do not specify it’s x=1, it could mean y=1, which is wrong. plus just the number 1 doesn’t really mean anything, is it an x-intercept? the gradient at one point? hope it helps!

weary wing
#

Ah okay, thanks for clarification! I’ll make sure not to mess that up.

peak path
#

no worries :)

quaint mason
#

Im lost on how to solve this

#

Trying different things and getting different solutions, none seems to be working.

peak path
#

@quaint mason you’re not doing this by hand right

quaint mason
#

No?

#

wym by hand?

peak path
#

like, without a calculator

quaint mason
#

i have a calculator

peak path
#

okay

#

Are you working on a or b?

quaint mason
#

a

peak path
#

for a, you plug in 3 into n(t) then plug in the answer into s(t)

#

lemme use my calculator and see what i get

quaint mason
#

thats what i did

peak path
#

28408.50999 is what i got

quaint mason
#

wait what

#

lemme try it again

peak path
#

okay

quaint mason
#

wait so

#

u plugged 3 in for t right? for time

#

and then plug into other equation as n

peak path
#

yes

#

plugged it into n(t) first then plug it into s(n), don’t worry about the variables, just plug the number in

quaint mason
#

oh ye i got it

#

ty

#

for b, wouldnt u divide that by 3? or no @peak path

peak path
#

nope you don’t have to

quaint mason
#

oh i mean for c

#

or do i just

#

replace the number

peak path
#

1997 is 2 years after 1995

#

so you find n(2)

quaint mason
#

ah repeat process

peak path
#

and then plug the value of n(2) into s(n)

#

but

quaint mason
#

?

peak path
#

you gotta multiply what u get by n(2)

quaint mason
#

multiply what

peak path
#

s(n(2)) x n(2)

#

actually

#

the question said average, even though they didn’t say “average annual earnings per person”, i’m guessing they mean the same thing?

#

if so, then it’s just s(n(2))

#

if its asking for total earning, then it’d be s(n(2)) x n(2)

quaint mason
#

hm

#

i did same thing and thats wrong

peak path
#

which one did you try?

quaint mason
#

and multiplying them both wouldnt make sense either

#

i tried both

peak path
#

ahh ok

quaint mason
#

Ah got it

#

Ty @peak path

peak path
#

@quaint mason oh no i forgot about this question im sorry oops

quaint mason
#

Nah its all gud haha

peak path
#

@quaint mason wait so how did u get it ?

quaint mason
#

Its the same step, my calculation was off thats all

#

Btw are u gud with graphs

#

f(g(x))

peak path
#

composite functions

quaint mason
#

Cuz im lost and tryna ask for help but apparently other peeps r lost too

peak path
#

ahahah i feel u

#

whats the question ?

quaint mason
#

Lemme send ss

peak path
#

is there a rule for the functions ?

#

likw, f(x) = 3x^3 + x^2 or something like that

quaint mason
#

nope

#

that is the entire problem

#

unfortunately, its estimating and ive tried every number so far that seems logical

#

someone recommended me findin the function itself but idk how i would be able to

peak path
#

ah i would recommend finding the fucntion itself

#

i found it

#

ok so

#

f(x) would be a cubic right ?

quaint mason
#

um

#

yes

#

f(x) would be cubic

#

and g(x) would be squared

#

i assume

peak path
#

g(x) is an exponential graph

#

are u familiar with that ?

quaint mason
#

ah yeah

#

y=ab^x?

peak path
#

y=ae^x

quaint mason
#

oh

#

2.71

peak path
#

have u learnt euler's number?

quaint mason
#

that one

peak path
#

yup the little e

quaint mason
#

i have

peak path
#

ok lets look at g(x) first

#

do u know how the basic exponential graph looks like?

#

y=e^x

quaint mason
#

yes

peak path
#

ok

#

compare it to g(x)

#

can u identify any transformations that have occured?

quaint mason
#

its the negative x

#

^-x

#

wait

peak path
#

you're right

#

reflected in the y-axis, right?

quaint mason
#

yes and its also raised up by 4

peak path
#

yup

#

hmm

#

i know what you're trying to say

#

but its called a dilation not translation, do u agree?

quaint mason
#

yeah

peak path
#

so do u know what g(x) equals to?

#

hint: g(x)=ae^-x

quaint mason
#

hmm

#

is it 5e^-x

peak path
#

you know the y intercept is (0,5), u plug the values in and solve for a

#

yup!

#

ok g(x) = 5e^-x

quaint mason
#

now find f(x) right?

peak path
#

yup

quaint mason
#

which is like y=ax^2+bx+c

#

or is that wrong

#

something like that

peak path
#

thats a quadratic

#

a cubic is to the power of 3

quaint mason
#

oh ye oops

#

my b

peak path
#

its okay:)

#

y=(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)

#

are u familiar with cubics in this form?

quaint mason
#

not really

#

havent seen that yet xD

peak path
#

its okay :)

#

have u guys learnt quadratic yet?

quaint mason
#

well quadratic functions?

peak path
#

yup

#

which is like y=ax^2+bx+c
@quaint mason this

quaint mason
#

yes

peak path
#

do u know how to factorise a quadratic function?

#

to make the function look like this basically y=(x-a)(x-b)

quaint mason
#

yea

peak path
#

and do you know what the values a and b represent?

#

from y=(x-a)(x-b)

quaint mason
#

a * b=c

#

well

#

ik how to factor

#

wym by what values a and b represent?

peak path
#

a and b represent the root of the function, i.e. the x-intercepts or where the graph cuts the x-axis

quaint mason
#

so whenever it crosses the x intercept?

peak path
#

because if you let y=0 to solve for the x-intercept, (x-a) = 0 or (x-b) = 0 because Null Factor Law

#

whenever it crosses the x-axis

quaint mason
#

Null Factor Law?

peak path
#

ahh ok, ill explain that later, but for now, just know that a and b is where the graph cuts the x axis

quaint mason
#

ok

peak path
#

looks like this

#

and thats the same for cubic functions too

#

y=(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)

quaint mason
#

c is if it crosses the 3rd time?

peak path
#

either one of a or b or c will equal to where f(x) cuts the x-axis (you'll have to approximate from the graph given)

#

mm

#

yes

#

but that wouldnt be possible for a quadratic right? because the maximum number of times a quadratic function can cut the x-axis is 2 times (since x can only equal to a maximum of two values in a quadratic)

#

therefore it has to be a cubic or a higher degree polynomial

#

(pls tell me if its confusing cuz idk how much u know hahah)

quaint mason
#

i see

#

no i get it

peak path
#

thats good

#

so lets say f(x) cuts the x-axis at (3.3,0)

#

do you know what f(x) will look like? (its not gonna be the final answer so theres still gonna be some variables in it)

quaint mason
#

lemme see

#

wym by that??

#

do ik what f(x) will look like as a function or?

peak path
#

either one of a or b or c will equal to where f(x) cuts the x-axis (you'll have to approximate from the graph given)
@peak path

quaint mason
#

so a would be 3.3

#

would u say where x=0, its intercepting or no

peak path
#

thats a good question, i was bout to get to that ahah

#

at x=0, its a turning point, do u agree ?

#

have u learnt about turning points?

quaint mason
#

turning point?

peak path
#

u might learnt it as vertex

quaint mason
#

ah yes

peak path
#

when there's a turning point at the x-axis, it basically means the graph "cuts the x-axis twice at the point"

quaint mason
#

twice? so ur saying a and b are both 0 and c would be 3.3

peak path
#

yup

#

so if y=(x-0)(x-0)(x-3.3)

#

y=(x)(x)(x-3.3)

#

y=(x^2) (x-3.3)

#

do u agree?

quaint mason
#

yes

#

sorry my wifi is slow rn

peak path
#

in simpler words, when the graph cuts the x- axis at point c, it will looks like (x-c)

#

when there is a turning point at the x-axis at point c, it will look like (x-c)^2

#

in this case, since c=0, its just x^2

#

sorry my wifi is slow rn
@quaint mason all good :)

quaint mason
#

x times x

peak path
#

x times x
@quaint mason ?

quaint mason
#

to get x^2

peak path
#

ahh yes

#

f(x) = x^2 (x-3.3)

#

but its not done yet

quaint mason
#

i factor that out

#

well

peak path
#

it should be -(x^2)(x-3.3)

quaint mason
#

multiply those 2

#

yeee

peak path
#

do u know why there's a negative sign?

quaint mason
#

but question

#

why negative

#

nah i was just gonna ask

#

haha

peak path
#

ahaha

#

give me like 5 mins ahah

#

im in tuition lol

#

for maths lol

quaint mason
#

sounds good

fleet yew
#

i don't really know where this goes

#

but i was never taught combinatorics or anything like that

#

how do you solve this problem

#

my initial intuition was 5/6 * 4/5 so i got the right answer by being numerically close

#

but wth am i actually supposed to do here

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

tfw self ping

peak path
#

ahaha

#

@fleet yew r u familiar with combinatrix

#

or factorials? the ! symbol

round fossil
#

5!

peak path
#

yes!

quaint mason
#

5! Aka 5×4×3×2×1

#

?

peak path
#

@quaint mason yup

#

@fleet yew if there are 3 people sitting in a row, how many different ways can they sit? do u know this? :)

fleet yew
#

@peak path sorry for late reply

#

i do know about factorials

#

and to answer your question, that would be 3 starting people multiplied by 2 people following

#

so 3!

#

that problem is easy intuitively but i just don't know enough to solve that kind of problem analytically

peak path
#

maybe youve made a typo, but it should be 3! = 3 x 2 x 1 = 6

#

ahh yes hahah

fleet yew
#

yeah that's what i meant

peak path
#

there are two type of questions, arrangement of objects in a row and arrangement of objects in a circle

#

for row questions, its n! , n=number of objects

#

for circle questions, its (n-1)!

fleet yew
#

unique?

peak path
#

for the same n value, circle would have less possible combinations because its a circle and the two ends are joined up

#

unique?
@fleet yew ?

fleet yew
#

the unique number of arrangements

#

like let's say you're in a circle

#

is ABCDEF different from BCDEFA

#

@peak path

#

?

#

<@&286206848099549185> sorry for ping but anyone else willing to explain?

peak path
#

@fleet yew ahh sorry for that

#

yes its unique

fleet yew
#

so alright then

#

we have x/5!

#

right?

#

what is x

#

5 choose 3?

peak path
#

let Kenji = K and Mary = M and the remaining 4 people b A B C D

#

K and M cant be together

#

so the probability is (5! - number of ways that K and M are sitting together) / 5!

fleet yew
#

(5! - 4!)/5!

#

?

#

is that it

peak path
#

i would write it out

#

K and M is considered a group now

#

6 people now technically becomes 5 people

fleet yew
#

ok

#

what next

peak path
#

sorry if i keep going on and off im in a class lol

fleet yew
#

it's alright lol, better than nothing

peak path
#

(5-1)! 2! is how many possible arrangements there are if K and M will sit together

#

2! is because there are 2 people in the bracket, so 2!

fleet yew
#

right because it could be (K,M) or (M,K)

peak path
#

yes

#

4! 2! = 48

#

(5! - 48) / 5! will get u the answer

#

so the probability is (5! - number of ways that K and M are sitting together) / 5!
@peak path

fleet yew
#

dude thanks so much

#

i was clueless going into this lol

#

they don't teach this shit at schools but expect you to know it on the ACT

#

I was never taught about binomial coefficients or factorials or any of that stuff

peak path
#

@fleet yew no problem

#

good luck for the ACT :P

fleet yew
#

@peak path are you in HS or college?

#

when are you supposed to learn this

#

i should've taken stats lol

peak path
#

last year of high school

#

i leant it last year

#

which is yr 11

#

which is sophomore ?? idek

#

ahh its junior

fleet yew
#

what was the class called

peak path
#

its called mathematical methods

#

idk whats the equivalent in usa

fleet yew
#

yeah that's not really a specific course here

#

like do you know what the unit was called

peak path
#

probability

fleet yew
#

ok yeah that makes sense

#

i never really learned about probability asides from the basic multiplying

#

like P(a+b) = P(a) * P(b)

#

here in america our math classes are calculus focused

peak path
#

ahh same

#

we only have 3 maths categories

#

two of them are very calculus focused

inland igloo
#

does anybody know how to solve pythag identities

peak path
#

c^2 = a^2 + b^2?

inland igloo
#

no i mean to prove that cos2x = sin2x = 1

#

cos^2x + sin^2x = 1

#

i mean

fleet yew
#

for this one you need a very basic proof

#

and then the other identities like cot^2 + 1 = sec^2 etc follow naturally

inland igloo
#

k im currently on this type of question

fleet yew
#

draw a right triangle with some arbitrary angle theta

#

in quadrant 1 of the unit circle

inland igloo
#

how would i do that?

#

@fleet yew how do i do this question?

peak path
#

@inland igloo have u learnt the unit circle

inland igloo
#

yes

peak path
#

so u know cos is x and sin is y ?

inland igloo
#

yes

#

but that has nothing to do with the unit circle as im

#

i would prove the identities

fleet yew
#

it does

#

the radius of the unit circle is 1

peak path
#

@inland igloo does this help

inland igloo
#

I know the basic

#

im just stuck on that question

peak path
#

to prove it ?

inland igloo
#

the one ive sent

#

yes

peak path
#

do u know what i did in the photo ?

inland igloo
#

Yes

#

you proved the basic identity

peak path
#

OHH

inland igloo
#

not the one im having trouble with

peak path
#

i didnt see the pic u sent

#

my bad