#precalculus
1 messages · Page 248 of 1
yes it is
cool
lol, it's a lot of arithmetic bashing
yes it is, i wish i had a calculator with me rn :V
now my question is, is there an easier way to prove something like this?
probably not
in fact, many problems like this, where the variables are in the third, fourth, or higher degree are extremely hard
yea, i had a few earlier with second powers and third power, i just used elliptic curves, but this one didnt work for that
you are in 8th grade and using elliptic curves on diophantine equations?
yea
rip my self esteem
lol
there are a couple good diophantine problems in the #challenge-problems channel if you want some more problems like this
although they are finding solutions, not proving that none exist
thanks, i find dinding solution is easier, i will them out 🙂
lotto advanced people here 
f(x)=1/sqrt(x-9) Is there a method to find the range of this function algebraically?
Yeah
Get the values that function will never produce
Then remove those from the real numbers
Help with this
@mighty stump Let me check
Thanks^
@mighty stump You have the y coordinate. The radius is your hypotenuse
Work from there
where would i place the triangle
You don't need to place it
Just remember the Pythagorean theorem
@mighty stump Did you get it?
y of P
from P to the origin?
@mighty stump From P to the x-axis
oh
What's a radius?
You got it
3/5
What's 3/5?
side of triangle from P
3/5 is the distance of P from the y axis
yea
yep
Then finding the trigonometric ratios is simple
You're welcome!!
would the distance between P and (1,0) be 1.788854?
would the distance between P and (1,0) be 1.788854?
@mighty stump Why do you need that?
to find trig t
No you don't need it
but then how do i find sin t and such
What's the definition of sine?
opposite/ hypotenuse
y/h
i dont understand what you mean by y/h
I meant y/r
Read the second page of this:
https://www.math.utah.edu/lectures/math1060/1-4PostNotes.pdf
i see
sin = -3/5 / 1
or no i would have to place x and y into that equation to get r
why is the sum of odd entries in an even row of pascal's trinagle equal to the sum of even entries in the same even row?
meaning 1
https://gyazo.com/62844cf424fbd06b76ed40a1bc37e180 for example, in the fourth row
1 + 6 + 1 = 4 + 4
{the odd entries sum} = {even entries sum}
why is that?
or no i would have to place x and y into that equation to get r
@mighty stump You already have x, y and r
yea i realized that
https://gyazo.com/62844cf424fbd06b76ed40a1bc37e180 for example, in the fourth row
@eager path Ugh, combinatorics...
that means sin is 4/5, cos is -3/5 and cos is -4/3 ?
that means sin is 4/5, cos is -3/5 and cos is -4/3 ?
@mighty stump Why do you get different values for cos?
Yeah
would cos 2t just be -6/5
would cos 2t just be -6/5
@mighty stump No
Look for something called sum of angles identity for sine. Double angle identity for sine will get you straight to the point.
what are the steps to prove this has no limit
@simple edge what have you tried
Also "this has no limit" is vague, use "this limit does not exist" on any case
So what you can do is to evaluate this limit from both sides, and if they are not equivalent, the limit does not exist.
@simple edge
ok
@viscid thistle do i use close values to 0 to get approximation
nvm i see it
thx
-ln(1/2) is the same as lin(1/2)^-1 so it just reciprocated to (2/1)^1 which is just 2
If somone has some time could y’all let me know if I use union or 2 different interval notations to show the line between 3-4 please and Thankyou.
[-3,4] is fine
you could say [-3,3) ∪ [3,4] but there is no reason to do that
Oh okay Thankyou, I was thinking I maybe needed separate ones,thanks again
nice
Need help on the first step. Thanks!
x= square root of 5y-25. The domain of f is [5,infinity) so the range of f^-1 would be [5,infinity)
Solve x from there
So to find the domain of f^-1, find the range of f
oh, so physics
how come sec 29pi/4 is -sqrt2
not sqrt2
ik i have to subtract it by 2pi
but i remember theres a faster approach where i choose a number closest to 29 but when i divide, it comes back as 2
if i continously subtract 2pi, then im able to get 5pi/4
which is what gives me te right answer
so ultimately its subtracting 6pis from it
<@&286206848099549185>
yes
and also
if i continously subtract 2pi, then im able to get 5pi/4
this is equvi
yeah
but i feel like its more time consuming
ooo
and since its 7pi
that isnt divisible by 2
hence why u add another pi/4
ooooo
@harsh smelt
is that the right way to think about it
29pi/4 = (28+1)pi/4
any further clarifications needed?
also you could do it as
29pi/4 = (32-3)pi/4 = 8pi - 3pi/4 and get equiv answer
anyway the task was to make it proper fraction and to get info about how many rotations were produced
are the asymptotes of a hyperbola the same intersecting lines that occur if we cut a double cone with a plane exactly in half?
"exactly in half" is vague
a plane that cuts through the vertex of the cone and is paralel to the cone axis
good thing is that you also teach me how to talk precisely like a mathematician
double thanks
$\frac{(x - h)^2}{a^2} - \frac{(y - k)^2}{b^2} = 1$
az:
when the y^2 term is negative the transverse axis in horizontal and vice versa
I can't wrap my head around this
can't reason about this
Any help on how left side can be simplified to right side would be greatly appreciated. Tried e^ix = cos(X) + isin(X) but it isn't working out
$\abs{\frac{ie^{-w_{0}\frac{t}{2}} - e^{iw_{0}\frac{t}{2}}}{2\sqrt{2}}}^2 = \frac{1 - \sin{wt}}{4}$
az:
If you multiply LHS by i/i you get the complex sin
I'm not given the right hand side, I'm just given the left and need to somehow change it into the RHS
but according to my prof solutions, that's what I'm meant to get, but he doesn't show how and I can't work out the process
np np, let me try that out, thanks mate
If you multiply LHS by i/i you get the complex sin
Inside the abs of course
@patent beacon sry for ping
but can we do our derivatives stuff agian
so if i have
$ ax^n $
argh texit difficult
anyway
a x^n
what would the derivative be
Josiah Mo:
$(3x{\color{green}{³}})'={\color{green}{3}}\cdot 3x^{3-1}=9x^2$
Al𝟛dium:
I can give you a general formula if you want
ok yes
(im going into 8th grade dont use too advanced words lol)
and im only going into alg 2
just got curious 2 day sago
so if it involves something advanced
oh
off
$(ax^n)'=a\cdot nx^{n-1}$
ummm
Al𝟛dium:
Another example if you want
yeah
with steps
im doing alg 2 in 8th grade this fall
but i got curious with what a derivative was
so i kinda went ahead
evne tho i only know 50 percent o
ff alg 2
$({\color{blue}{7}}x^{\color{green}{5}})'={\color{green}{5}}\cdot {\color{blue}{7}}x^{{\color{green}{5}}-1}=35x^4$
Al𝟛dium:
Hope the colouring makes it clearer
im doing alg 2 in 8th grade this fall
We get it you don't have to repeat it every minute
Lol
@proud crypt look at the new example
ok
oh the coloring is better thx
gosh u are good with texit
@viscid thistle oops sry ig i got carried away
Thanks lol
Josiah Mo:
Don't worry :)
Let me see if the formula clarifies with this wait a sec
also comparing myself to others lol
like "oh everyone else is doing topology im dumb"
ok s
O
the derivative of ax^n
would be
exponent mutlipled by current coefficient
making new coefficient
exponent - 1
$$({\color{blue}{a}}x^{\color{green}{n}})'={\color{green}{n}}\cdot {\color{blue}{a}}x^{{\color{green}{n}}-1}$$ $$({\color{blue}{7}}x^{\color{green}{5}})'={\color{green}{5}}\cdot {\color{blue}{7}}x^{{\color{green}{5}}-1}=35x^4$$
also $(c\cdot f(x) )'=c\cdot f' (x) $
so...
HoboSas:
is my interprtation correct?
Al𝟛dium:
Yes
I'd say
- Bring down coefficient as an factor
- Substract 1 to the exponent
But yes
ok
but why does this work
ik how to use a basic derivative i think
so if we have $ y = x^2$
Josiah Mo:
and we also have $ y' = 2x'$
Josiah Mo:
but why does this work
You would have to use the definition of derivative, which involves limits
oh
Without the ' on the 2x
oh oops
well lets say u haev x = 3
x: 3
y: 9
slope: 6
awesome the possiblities for this seem endless
one question tho
how can a singular point have slope
wait so the slope of the line
at x = 3
is 9 righ t
according to a derivative
but wait
isnt (3, 9) a point not a line segment or cuve/
Derivative is a tool to locally approximate functions as lines
(3, 9) can represent a vector too
is 9 righ t
It's 6
oh right
well y = 9
slope = 6
wait
Derivative is a tool to locally approximate functions as lines
@viscid thistle huh??
Try to draw it
Try to draw it
On paper
line is y=6x-9
Exercise
ok
line is y=6x-9
This is the tangent to x^2 when x=3
Yes
Would add y'
Then use desmos ig
2x-1 is tangent when x=1
-1 only moves the actual function
oh
stupid me
ahh yes
ok so my point is
So derivatives:
take a point and plug in
but points cant have slopes
only lines can
I mean 2 points can give us a slope not 1: $m=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$
Al𝟛dium:
Because those 2 points can form a line
but derivative doesnt use 2 points
right?
from what i can tell it takes 1 point as input
and returns slope
i never see 2 points
The derivative of a function or the equation of a line
Don't worry about it, you are learning adv stuff if you are on 7/8th grade
Derivative is a tool to locally approximate functions as lines
Here
Okay, so do you know what a tangent line to a function is? @proud crypt
He is about to do 8th grade lol
Up to you if you do want to know Josiah, you will, probably soon, have more experience and the opportunity to learn this
The derivative is a way to show rate of change, which is the amount by which a function is changing at one given point.
If you want a more formal definition
@proud crypt you there?
I do suggest 3b1b's essence of calculus series, if you want to get more grasp on this
oh yeah sry i had to do smth quickly
@patent beacon i think so?
like the line that touches the function
at the bottom i think
once
like tangent to circle
but how can a derivative
show rate of change
if it takes 1 point as input?
like if u have
Yeah yeah, it's a line that just touches the function.
Let's say you pick a point on the function at x. Then construct the tangent line there. The derivative gives you that line's slope
Josiah Mo:
and
if it takes 1 point as input?
no it does not
$ y = 2x$
Josiah Mo:
We cheat a little bit and just say that this is "the slope of the function at that point"
Yaya
It's also taking the function y = x² as an input
^
Mind you, we didn't talk about how we actually determine what derivatives are, but you do need to feed the function in to get the derivative info
That's essentially what functions are. They show the relation between an input and an output.
Also, it's usually nice to know the context of a function to dissect its information easier.
the domain of a function is the set of inputs you can plug in without there being a calculation error (division by zero, root of a negative number, or log of a non-positive number)
the range is the set of all outputs your function produces
How do i solve this? Either using trigo or differntiation
complex numbers allowed?
Yeah, I think I derived this result using De Movire's Theorem/Euler's Form.
i am asking codin if that's a route they are allowed to take
I know.
@rapid tangle?
@willow bear no complex numbers not allowed because they haven't taught us that yet....it would be nice if only trigonometry is used
the domain of a function is the set of inputs you can plug in without there being a calculation error (division by zero, root of a negative number, or log of a non-positive number)
the range is the set of all outputs your function produces
@willow bear too many big words for me
😔💔
what big words
Everything
i specifically tried to make it so that there were not that many big words
bruh
And could this also be solved using differntiation too? not that I'm allowed to do that...just for curiousity's sake @willow bear
the more vague you are in stating your doubts, the less i can help you @grim sand
I’m sorry sir/ma’am
I’m bout to take a test on domain and range
And I don’t know what it is
😔💔
about to take a test?
well then you're kinda fucked i guess because no amount of explanation will fix the hole in your knowledge THAT fast

don't sir me
if you insist on using an honorific and not just my name then please use ma'am
@rapid tangle yeah so it turns out there is a purely trigonometric way to do this
ok i specifically am asking you not to call me sir because i really fucking don't like being called sir
that is already toned down
how can you be about to take a test which you got a 3/10 on, and was due in 30 mins
@viscid thistle time travel 
@willow bear how
how can you be about to take a test which you got a 3/10 on, and was due in 30 mins
@viscid thistle due in 30 mins
Finished in 1 min

@rapid tangle are you ok with sigma notation?
are people so lazy that they can't even get a decent picture for people they want homework from?
@Fiwam#4468 yes
Oh he left
@willow bear yes
okay great
so the thing to pull out of your ass here is multiplication and division by sin(θ/2)
Wait what
here lemme show you
Yess
No that's fine and what u did there is big brain but what's a telescoping sum tho
ok so basically if you write it all out
the cos(3/2 theta), cos(5/2 theta), cos(7/2 theta) etc terms will cancel out
the ones in the middle will
the only thing that's left is at the ends
more generally $\sum_{k=1}^n (a_{k-1} - a_k) = a_0 - a_n$
Ann:
Ohhhh i get it damn this is such an elegant solution
it's big brain
is y = k/x a hyperbola?
Yes, any equation of the form xy = k is a hyperbola
how can we show that by converting y = k/x to the standard form x^2/a^2 - y^2/b^2 = 1 ?
We have y = k/x
So we get xy = k
Now define a new coordinate axes with X axis and Y axis where X = (x + y)/2 and Y = (x - y)/2
Substituting in xy = k, we get,
(X +Y)(X - Y) = k
Which gives X^2 - Y^2 = k
We define the new coordinate axes like that because xy = k is basically a rotation of 45 degrees of the hyperbola x^2 - y^2 = 1 about the coordinate axes
wow
this is cool
thank you
I think that's gonna come up later in my precalc book
rotation
also, the asymptotes are the original axis
ok so heres what ik about derivatives so far:
- what it is
2.the proof of how ti works
3.the general formula
but how do i do it if i have a polynomila?
like $ x^2 + 5x + 4$?
Josiah Mo:
im preety sure u have to use dy/dx on everything but not sure...
What is that you wanna do?
turn the polynomial in ao a derivative
well find its derivative
i only know so far how to do with monomials
derivative is linear
yes...
parentheses
Commander Vimes:
like distributive property
cuz ist monomials put together
awesome
lemme try one
altho i suck with texit
ill just not use texit actually
so if we have
$ x^2 + 5x +4 $
Josiah Mo:
Josiah Mo:
am i right?
huh
the derivative of 5x is 5
but wiat
the derivative of 4 is 0
so its $ 5x^1$
Josiah Mo:
o0h ok
5 * 1 = 5
and 4 would be
wait
0?
so 4 = 1 * 4^1
wouldnt derivative of 4 be 1
cuz exponent - 1
is 0
4^0 = 1
*1 = 1
so its 1?
ramonov:
i mean its both
because you're trying to forcibly use a rule where it doesn't apply
oh ok
4 = 1*4^1 is true. however the power rule doesn't apply as 4^1 doesn't have a base of *x
4 is a constant
ahh i see i think
Can someone help me so how would I find domain and range of this.
Would range be infinite? Or would it stop at 3
the range is the output of a function or what you can see on the y axis
looking at the graph, what range of the y axis does it cover?
the y goes up but does the graph goes above 3 on the y axis?
(-inf, 3]
3 is closed
So if it’s closed it would be ] instead did )?
I never understood the difference in those
it's closed when the point itself is also included in the interval
Oh okay
How do I find domain of this I only know how to do the graph ones
Since domain is all X
What is X since it’s Y=
aren't there any values in R that you can't substitute for x because it won't make any sense?
real numbers
what about 0?
Vertical asymptote would be 0
so you saying we can divide 2 by 0?
This would be the graph
Ummm no
I’m lost
I only know how to do the simple graphs 😔
Teacher told me it never touches 0
you see
On these type of graphs
2/0 is undefined hence 0 is not part of the domain
^
So how do I find the domain..
So INF
-INF
Can u give me an example
I’m sorry I’m still lost 😔
All values of X
I think he meant it for the Fim or Lim(x) equations
dividing by 0 is not defined
you must always make sure to avoid it
when you have an equation of the form k/x
you must define the domain in way that it excludes 0
So how do I even find the x values of Y=2/x
its defined everywhere except for 0
So I can just put any number
the domain is the set of valid inputs
do you understand that 2/x is undefined when x=0?
(hence 0 is not part of the domain)
Yes because 2 can’t be divided by 0
ok good.
weird wording
But correct?
x doesn't really "touch" values
y is undefined at x=0, there is no corresponding y value at x=0.
...
I haven’t had math in 2 years I’m so lost
do i really have to repeat:
do you understand that 2/x is undefined when x=0?
(hence 0 is not part of the domain)
your domain would be all the set of all real values excluding 0
which could be represented in interval notation as
(-inf,0)U(0,inf)
because inf by itself does not represent a set of values
So the domain would be -INF,0
Because x can be any number
At all
Then 0,INF because
I don’t know that one
parentheses
]-inf, 0[ same as (-inf, 0) then, Ramonov?
^ I was thinking the same
yeh
inf is not a number
now, can you ever reach inf?
hence the parantheses instead of brackets
if the notation is taught, reverse brackets are less ambiguous than parentheses as those could be misinterpreted as points
i wasnt taught the rev bracket though
only heard of it from this server lol
yeh me neither
i was angry at first but i'm starting to like them
I understood the first part now
(-INF,0)
But what about the (0,INF)
Why is it flipped
N what does the U mean
union
U is a set union
(-inf,0)U(0,inf) would be the combined set of negative and positive numbers,
i.e. the set of real numbers excluding 0
It’s my 2nd day in online pre calc and my teacher not explaining clearly
I’m having a rough time
Plz help
What’s that
oh thats great
lol
I don’t understand that
you need \{
${1,2,3} \cup {6,7,8} = {1,2,3,6,7,8}$
or something
FlynnXD:
which part are you unsure about atm?
well, no repetitions though
FlynnXD:
@obsidian monolith so it’s just another way to combine them?
which part are you unsure about atm?
@uncut mulch everything
I have no clue what’s going on I only remember my multiplication addition subtraction and division
so it’s just another way to combine them?
its another operation between sets
(-inf,0) only represents the negative numbers
^
do you understand that?
are you familiar with these set notations firstly
Jupiter, they don't want you to think infinity is a number, and they don't want you thinking $\sqrt{-1}$ is one either
KD:
So they want you looking for $\sqrt{2x-1} = \sqrt{-1}$
inf is a state of mind
$x \in (-\infty, 0) \ \text{is equivalent to saying} \ x< 0$
inf is something used to represent something boundless or something like that
When TeXit renders, it will be more clear
Dah bot is gone
So on this how do I do this
The first one I understood now because
0 can’t be used
So exclude 0
And INF can’t be reached
So exclude that
But the graph keep going so it is INF
you are dealing with radical in denominator
so, it can't be negative and also not zero
So (-INF,0) U (connect it) (0,INF)
Is this a test Jupiter
No it’s some class work
That I have no clue on
N teacher isn’t available till Monday
😔💔
Okay so what's the question
It's time to use the brain. We hate to do it, but there's no other way
you must see for what values 2x -1 <= 0 and exclude them
7 or 8?
The problem 7 or 8
Oh
Both actually
I have no clue what to do in those
I’m learning step by step from y’all
Okay
And I thank y’all for your patience
It’s like 4 different ppl helping me and probably raging cuz I have no clue what’s going on
You know what a fraction can't have in the denominator?
im raging at the stupid texit bot
When doing combinations of it’s like g(h(f(x))) can you work from the inside out. So like do h(f(x)) plus all the f(x) function into the x spots in h and then take that function and plus it into all the x’s Of g?
I’m trying to create a 10 function combination and just want to make sure working from the inside out is best
@heady mica there is a discussion going on here
don't worry Jupiter, the people on this server got you mate
When doing combinations of it’s like g(h(f(x))) can you work from the inside out. So like do h(f(x)) plus all the f(x) function into the x spots in h and then take that function and plus it into all the x’s Of g?
I’m trying to create a 10 function combination and just want to make sure working from the inside out is best
@heady mica occupied channel, move.
don't worry Jupiter, the people on this server got you mate
@novel cargo thank you
You know what a fraction can't have in the denominator?
@grim sand
It’s my senior year and for some reason I have such hard classes
So I’m trying my best
@grim sand
@viscid thistle a 0?
Good
Then what’s next
And what numbers a square root can't take? Or don't have a real solution for them
Odd numbers
Al𝟛dium:
Yes
😃I’m learning
So we don't want 0's and negative numbers on the denominator, do you agree?
Sure so what we usually can do to check for the values of x that can be on the domain for a sqrt in the denominator is to solve for: 2x-1>0
Huh
No it's okay
It has all the stuff we learned in 2 days
Question 1-5 I think I understood
But y’all helped me with 6-8 cuz I have no clue what those are
I may post a youtube video to get you started on inequalities, hold up. They are very simple
Yes please
This Algebra video tutorial explains how to solve inequalities that contain fractions and variables on both sides including absolute value function expressions. It also shows you how to plot / graph the inequality solution on a number line and how to write the solution using ...
The beginning of the video is very important for the introductory of inequalities
Is this where like questions about ap stats go
If it's stats you can go #probability-statistics i guess @rose trellis
Or any of the #question channels
solving linear inequalities should definitely come before functions
Indeed
as well as interval notation (conveniently shown above)
I watched
I understood all of 10 mins
I’m a visual learner so it was so simple watching him do it
@viscid thistle now what
Okay yes
X>0/1
2
X>0/2
I mean
1/2
And it’ll be a open circle
So it’ll be a parenthesis
$2x-1>0\implies 2x>1\implies x>\frac12$ yes
Al𝟛dium:
So (-INF, 1/2)
Huh
U were helping me with question 7?
Yes
Oh
Lmao
I thought u just gave me a random one
How’d u simplify the equation to make it look so easy
But they make it look so confusing
So we don't want 0's and negative numbers on the denominator, do you agree?
Remember this?
U just threw them away?
What are you saying lol
-3 doesn't affect the domain
Okay listen to me
So the top doesn’t have anything to do with the domain
If we’re looking for domain only focus on the bottom
In this case, no
Sure
What’s a discontinuities
Al𝟛dium:
That’s a huge number
What would you look at now
Only x+3?
I wanna test you on "does it matter if it's million on the denominator"
Only x+3?
Yes
So what we said earlier
How’d u put the > in there
What a denominator cannot have
Huh
Do
Look $\frac{1}{-3}$ does this have a solution
So*
Al𝟛dium:
Yes
What is a real solution
But $\frac10$ does not exist
Al𝟛dium:
What is a real solution
Uh don't worry about it
It can’t divide
Yeah you can't divide by 0
Yes
So what we are gonna do with your problem is to ask the function: for which values of x, does the denominator equal 0?
Therefore, solving x+3=0 see?
Umm
Al𝟛dium:
Yes so we use 0?
We use to solve for the values of x that make the denominator 0
Therefore, solving for x+3=0
Can it also be >or = to 0
You can see yourself that x=0 is on the domain perfectly, $\frac{4727}{0+3}=\frac{4727}{3}$ see?
Al𝟛dium:
Can it also be >or = to 0
The < or > are for square roots, we'll move there after
My teacher always told me that X always = 1
What?
lol
you mean: $x = 1x$?
ramonov:
Yes
So X=0 confuse me
Please remember to read all my messages, i will repeat myself

