#precalculus

1 messages · Page 219 of 1

novel dirge
#

and now I am also worried that if I use P instead of whatever I am supposed to use

#

she will start tallking how I copied my homework from the internet

#

like she did once before, but luckily, I did it on my own

#

but she did catch like half my class

#

and was all smug

#

sorry for the rant

#

can you please explain how my notation doesn't work and how the one you wrote is different?

stable pasture
#

Is limits a part of precalculus or calculus?

steel venture
#

@novel dirge reviewing it it looks like mine doesn't actually work

#

the best way to approach it is to say

#

$P(A'\cap B'\cap C')'$

obsidian monolithBOT
steel venture
#

precalc

stable pasture
#

sorry

steel venture
#

np

#

@novel dirge to explain why your notation fails we can look at two variations of it

#

$(P(A)\cup P(B))\cup P(C)$

obsidian monolithBOT
steel venture
#

and $P(A)\cup (P(B)\cup P(C))$

obsidian monolithBOT
steel venture
#

for the first

#

$P(A)\cup P(B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A\cap B)$

obsidian monolithBOT
novel dirge
#

the problem is that Idk what + and - do

steel venture
#

its just adding and subtracting

#

whoops

#

$P(A)$ will be a number between 0 and 1
@steel venture

obsidian monolithBOT
novel dirge
#

not sure what that means either...

steel venture
#

just that $P(A)$

obsidian monolithBOT
novel dirge
#

I feel like an idiot now for not understanding this

steel venture
#

will be a number between 0 and 1

#

don't, it can be confusing

#

but P(A) is just the probability something happens

novel dirge
#

so P(A) can be 0,6?

steel venture
#

yep

#

any number between 0 and 1

#

inclusive

novel dirge
#

ok

#

I understand that now

#

but not how it is connected to the other parts

#

or how I use that

steel venture
#

so now if we look at

#

$P(A)\cup P(B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A\cap B)$

obsidian monolithBOT
steel venture
#
  • and - just mean add
#

and subtract

novel dirge
#

...

#

I never did any operations with groups

#

what can I google to see how this works?

#

the + and -

steel venture
#

its the same thing as saying 1 + 1

#

or .5 + .7

#

or x + y

#

and 6 - z

#

its just adding

#

and subtracting

novel dirge
#

ok, but how do I do the adding and subtracting?

#

How do I get this $P(A)\cup P(B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A\cap B)$
?

obsidian monolithBOT
steel venture
#

before we go forwards

#

i made a mistake

#

its not $P(A)\cup P(B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A\cap B)$

obsidian monolithBOT
steel venture
#

its $P(A\cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A\cap B)$

obsidian monolithBOT
novel dirge
#

ok

steel venture
#

but

#

it really means what it says

#

say we have two probabilities

#

A and B

#

the probability of A or B is = the probability of A + the probability of B - the probability of both

novel dirge
#

I kinda understand it when you write it and explain it like that

#

but I couldn't do it myself

#

that is the biggest problem

steel venture
#

well just remember

#

P(A) means the probability of A happening

#

P(AnB) is the probability of both A and B happening

#

P(AuB) is the probability of A or B happening, not both

novel dirge
#

so if I have A and B and just one of them turns out to be true I can write AuB?

steel venture
#

um no

#

usually when you work with these variables

#

A and B will be events

#

and you won't really get "results"

#

it mostly about the probabilities of the events

novel dirge
#

Yeah, but I have to somehow write it like that

#

in that format

steel venture
#

can you show me the question

#

what language is it

novel dirge
#

Serbian

steel venture
#

hm

#

can you translate it

novel dirge
#

yep

#
a. Ostvarila su se sva tri događaja A,B i C
b. Ostvario se bar jedan od događaja A,B,C
c. Ostvarila su se bar dva od događaja A,B,C
d. Od događaja A,B,C, ostvarili su se samo A i B
e. Ostvario se samo jedan od događaja A i B
f. Ostvarila su se dva od događaja A,B,C
g. Nije se ostvario nijedan od događaja A,B,C
h. Ostvarilo se najviše dva od događaja A,B,C.```
#

this is the problem

steel venture
#

which one specifically

novel dirge
#

Write it like the group expressions( I think that is the closest translation I can think of)

steel venture
#

i put it on google translate no worries

novel dirge
#

and then a to h are the different casses

steel venture
#

but whhich one are you talking about

novel dirge
#

well, all of them

steel venture
#

so if I have A and B and just one of them turns out to be true I can write AuB?
@novel dirge

novel dirge
#

but I would like to be able to figure them out myself

steel venture
#

when you said this

novel dirge
#

d

#

no

#

not d

#

e

#

e) Only one of the events A and B turned out to be true

steel venture
#

gotcha

#

so we have A B and C

#

and either A is true

#

or B is true

novel dirge
#

yes

steel venture
#

ah

#

i see

#

yes you were correct

#

I thought we were talking about probabilities but i think AuB is what your teacher is looking for

novel dirge
#

yes

#

I mean, it isn't her that made this, she just found this on the internet

#

but yes

#

that is the format I am supposed to write this in

#

so for e I can write AUB?

steel venture
#

yep

novel dirge
#

Can you help me with the rest?

#

I will try doing them first though

#

and you correct me if I am wrong

#

is that ok with you?

steel venture
#

sure

novel dirge
#

great, thanks

carmine elbow
#

When you're done helping him/her, can you help me with a problem?

novel dirge
#

For b, I am not sure if it can be AUBUC?

#

if one of 2 is AuB then shouldn't AuBuC be if it is 1 of 3?

steel venture
#

but it doesn't include a and b and c

#

or a and b

#

you want at least 1

novel dirge
#

and what does mine say?

steel venture
#

just 1

novel dirge
#

just one of the 3?

steel venture
#

yes

novel dirge
#

but it is supposed to be at least 1

#

oh, there is an at least

steel venture
#

yes

novel dirge
#

damn

#

this changes it

#

for g, where nothing happened, would it be A'nB'nC'?

steel venture
#

yeah

novel dirge
#

I still can't figure out b

#

can you help me?

steel venture
#

yeah sure

#

so think of it this way

#

if we want at least 1

#

then there can't be a scenario where none happen right?

novel dirge
#

yes

#

but since it says at least 1 even more can happen

#

like 2 or even 3

steel venture
#

yep

novel dirge
#

right?

steel venture
#

just not 0

#

how do we write 0 happening

novel dirge
#

A'nB'nC'?

steel venture
#

good

novel dirge
#

so (A'nB'nC')' ?

steel venture
#

yep

novel dirge
#

😆

#

for d, where out of A,B and C, only A and B happened, it would be (AnBnC')?

#

since it doesn't include C

steel venture
#

👍

novel dirge
#

it is?

steel venture
#

yep

novel dirge
#

great

#

but I have no idea what to do if at least 2 of 3 are true

steel venture
#

which letter is that

novel dirge
#

c

#

c. Ostvarila su se bar dva od događaja A,B,C

#

at least 2 events happened

steel venture
#

you could say something along the lines of
(AnBnC')u(AnB'nC)u(A'nBnC)u(AnBnC)

novel dirge
#

so that is either any 2 are true or all are true?

steel venture
#

yep

novel dirge
#

and if only 2 are correct, I just drop the last part?

#

(AnBnC')u(AnB'nC)u(A'nBnC)

steel venture
#

yep

novel dirge
#

and for the last

#

were max 2 of 3 are true

#

that means that 1 is always false?

#

so can that be A'nB'nC' ?

steel venture
#

that is just the probability that all 3 don't happen

#

but you have the right idea

#

max of 2

#

means that

#

you can never have how many

novel dirge
#

3

#

so 1 and 2 are possible

steel venture
#

but 3 isn;t

#

so how do you write that all three together is not true

novel dirge
#

(AnBnC)' ?

steel venture
#

👍

novel dirge
#

sorry, but is it possible for you to just quickly check this?

#

just to make sure I didn't mess up somewhere

#

and thank you for the help and patience

steel venture
#

looks good

novel dirge
#

great

#

thanks

hushed sorrel
#

im not US

#

but is precalc including complex numbers?

#

bc i have a complex number q idk where to post

uncut mulch
#

semi-advanced algebra. use one of the free general questions channels denoted by greek letters

hushed sorrel
#

ok thx xx

silk sail
#

Can someone help me with writing this function?

#

Suppose the value of Tech Advanced stock (in dollars) is given by g(t)where t represents the number of days after January 1, 2014. Express the values of the following stocks in terms of the function
g

The value of VirtualTech's stock, p(t), is always the same as the value of TechAdvanced's stock two weeks later.

sour hemlock
#

I think your question is incomplete

silk sail
#

Here is the entire question. I just cant figure out C.

sour hemlock
#

p(t) = g(t+14)

silk sail
#

Ok thank you that makes sense, idk why that one was seeming so confusing to me

novel dirge
#

@steel venture sorry for bothering you again

#

but I just checked again and am a bit confused with the second answer

#

where at least 1 needs to be positive

#

(A'nB'nC')'

#

isn't that the same as just (AnBnC)?

willow bear
#

no

#

it's $A \cup B \cup C$ actually

obsidian monolithBOT
novel dirge
#

(A'nB'nC')'
is equal to that or that is the correct solution to my problem?

#

because at least one has to be true

#

out of 3

willow bear
#

i'm saying $(A' \cap B' \cap C')' = A \cup B \cup C$

obsidian monolithBOT
novel dirge
#

oh

#

but is that correct for my problem?

#

that at least one of the 3 is true?

willow bear
#

idk

#

i cbf to scroll all the way up

novel dirge
#

you don't have to scroll up

#

I have to write a formula using set operations

#

to express that out of 3 events -A,B and C, at least 1 happened

#

and the formula is what I got with the help of Buncho

#

but now when I tried to check it again, by myself I got confused

#

same for the one where no events are true, where we wrote - A'nB'nC'

#

can you please also check them, if it isn't a problem?

novel dirge
#

anyone?

viscid thistle
#

I don't understand why don't you use OR ?

novel dirge
#

how should I use it?

viscid thistle
#

You have 3 events right?

novel dirge
#

yes

viscid thistle
#

And you want that one or two or three events happened?

novel dirge
#

in one problem, at least 1 of the 3 happened

#

but can be more

#

and in the second problem, 0 happened

viscid thistle
#

And what do you have to write?

novel dirge
#

I need to write a formula that does this, but with set operations

viscid thistle
#

The U is a sort of "OR" for the sets
In French we call it "union" I am searching the English word

novel dirge
#

I think it is also Union

viscid thistle
#

What do you call a set operations, U isn't one of them?

novel dirge
#

in my language we call it something similar

#

it is

#

in one problem, either A or B is true

#

so the solution is to write AUB

#

Idk if I am overthinking about the 2 problems I asked here about, but the more I think about them, the less I understand them

viscid thistle
#

So why don't use it in your problem?

#

AUBUC

novel dirge
#

and would that be the correct solution?

#

so that at least one is true?

viscid thistle
#

Yes why wouldn't it be?

#

Yes realshit

novel dirge
#

and what about the second one?

#

where none are true

#

is that one correct?

viscid thistle
#

Repost it I didn't see it

novel dirge
#

A'nB'nC'

#

none of the 3 are true

viscid thistle
#

Yes

#

Or it can be '(A U B U C)

novel dirge
#

and if at least 2 are true (AnBnC)' ?

viscid thistle
#

Ok ok wait

novel dirge
#

ok, sorry

viscid thistle
#

To make the think easier

#

Try to think like if U was "or", n was "and"

#

' was "not"

#

Now try to retrieve the solution you find with this method

novel dirge
#

The thing is, I don't have much problems solving if the entire formula is true or not

#

I have problems writing it

#

which doesn't really make sense

viscid thistle
#

The problem is "at least two event are true"

#

Right '

#

?

novel dirge
#

yes

viscid thistle
#

I have a formula but it is quite long

#

Try to find a formula with the method I told you

novel dirge
#

is the one I wrote here wrong?

viscid thistle
#

Repost it whycat

novel dirge
#

no

#

wait

#

I did that one

#

I asked about the one with max 2

#

so out of 3 events max is 2 correct

viscid thistle
#

What?

#

There can't be 3 events correct?

novel dirge
#

no

#

2 is the highest number of correct events

#

I wrote it incorrectly the last time

viscid thistle
#

Okay

#

So

#

With and, or, and not

novel dirge
#

and the formula for that is (AnBnC)'?

viscid thistle
#

A' U B' U C'

#

Yes

#

It works

novel dirge
#

the one I sent?

viscid thistle
#

They are the same

novel dirge
#

great

#

thank you

viscid thistle
#

Np

slim finch
#

@toxic nova can you help me with question again pls 🙂

patent beacon
#

What's the question?

rich light
#

I can’t factor any more from there correct? So I head right to sign analysis + interval notation?

patent beacon
#

@rich light
Okay, so you want to know when
(2x + 1)(x - 3) is positive

#

That happens when they're both positive, or when they're both negative

rich light
#

why do I want to know why it's positive in that case vs negative in the last example we talked about?

#

like when you helped me with my other question

twilit shadow
patent beacon
#

If ab > 0
Then a and b have the same sign.

If ab < 0
Then a and b have opposite signs

#

@twilit shadow
Check your multiplication on (x + 4y)(x + 4y)

twilit shadow
#

Thanks

#

I see what I did

tardy ridge
#

use pascals triangle

rich light
#

This look right?

#

@patent beacon

patent beacon
#

If 2x + 1 ≤ 0 and x - 3 ≤ 0,
Then x ≤ -1/2 and x ≤ 3
Which is satisfied by x ≤ -1/2

#

But the logic is correct, x ≥ 3 and x ≤ -1/2 are the solutions to this problem

obsidian monolithBOT
patent beacon
#

You can see the solution where the parabola goes above the x-axis

rich light
#

okay yeah, I see what I did wrong

#

thanks

#

in terms of interval notation, would it be (3, ♾️ ) (-1/2, ♾️ ) @patent beacon ?

patent beacon
#

(-inf, -1/2] U [3, inf)

#

The U means "union", which is just a way to combine the sets into one.

rich light
#

okay, why did you get -inf for the first?

toxic nova
#

@slim finch yes

vapid torrent
#

A vase has 10 black balls in it and 10 red balls, a second vase has 10 red and 20 black. If a coin is tossed, and its heads, 2 balls are taken out of the first vase, if its tails, 2 balls are taken out of the second vase

#

How can I create a probability space for this?

karmic wave
#

@rich light the negative infinity comes from the less than part

rich light
#

gotcha

harsh cipher
#

Hello

uneven dawn
#

Could anyone hop in voice chat for a few minutes and walk me through a radical function problem?

#

Like this one ^

harsh cipher
#

lose root and solve

uneven dawn
#

just square both sides?

#

would the right then just be 5x + 10?

#

Its also asking for the sum of solutions so how could it just be one answer?

#

I think i got it actually, I need to do sqrt(5x-3) * sqrt(5x-3) * -1^2

#

?

#

I struggle to even find a video solving a problem like this one

daring yarrow
#

(a+b)² = a²+2ab+b²

#

@uneven dawn

#

also

#

very similar problem

viscid thistle
daring yarrow
#

is M the middlepoint of the circle

viscid thistle
#

It's a parabola and yes, M is the midpoint

uncut mulch
#

consider: (p+q)^2

viscid thistle
#

Is it something to do with the p^2 + q^2 / 2 bit

uncut mulch
#

(p+q)^2 expands to p^2 + q^2 + 2pq which is related to that and the given relatationship p + q = pq

viscid thistle
#

p^2 + q^2 + 2(p+q) ?

uncut mulch
#

yes

viscid thistle
#

Is that supposed to be on the y coordinate tho

#

Oh wait never mind

#

I think I got it

#

y = x^2 / 2 ?

uncut mulch
#

you're missing something

viscid thistle
#

Crap

#

Was i close

#

What do I have to do next after that expansion then

uncut mulch
#

(p+q)^2 = p^2 + q^2 + 2(p+q)
x^2 = p^2 + q^2 + 2x
what is p^2 + q^2 in terms of y?

#

you ignored the part involving 2(p+q)

viscid thistle
#

In terms of y, wouldn't 2y = p^2 + q^2

uncut mulch
#

yes

viscid thistle
#

or the other way around

#

Hmm alright I'll try this out now, and I'll see if I can get the answer

#

I think I got it

#

y = (x^2 + 2x)/2

uncut mulch
#

are you sure its +?

viscid thistle
#

Oh my bad minus

#

But is that right tho?

uncut mulch
#

if its a minus, and not a plus. yeh

viscid thistle
#

Fuck how did I not get that thanks for the help

uncut mulch
#

if your comfortable with the relation between (p+q)2, p^2 + q^2 and pq, its easier to work from y.

#

$y = \frac{p^2+q^2}{2} = \frac{ (p+q)^2 - 2pq}{2}$

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
#

I recognised the fact that there was a p + q and a p^2 + q^2 and I did it halfway through but then I stopped because I thought i was overthinking it

#

Grrr

#

There goes 3 marks

uncut mulch
#

if you did some sort of squaring of (p+q) you'd likely still get 1

viscid thistle
#

Unfortunately not

#

Bad habit of overthinking things

vernal spindle
#

How can I find sin(195) without just typing it in a calculator

past meadow
#

sin is taken based on the angle from the x axis, and its pi/6 from the x axis

#

but its negative in that quadrant

#

so -sin(pi/6)

#

pi/6 being 15 degrees obviously

#

wait im wrong

#

pi/12

#

not pi/6

#

but same concept

vernal spindle
#

erm

#

what do you mean from the x axis

past meadow
#

like in terms of the unit circle centreed on the origin

vernal spindle
#

isn't sin the y axis since its (cos,sin) ?

past meadow
#

the angle is measured from the x-axis

#

is what i meant

#

the actual value is the y coordinate

#

idk im sorry if that was poorly explained

lilac pier
#

@vernal spindle What sneaky means is that sin is negative in the third and fourth quadrants. We have the angle 195 degrees atm so it's in the third quarant and it's negative. Now we always go for the shortest possible angle from the x-axis.

past meadow
#

Thanks for clarifying, it was probably a bad explanation

vernal spindle
#

Ok I get that now, so we know sin is negative

fleet yew
#

P(no spades) = 1 - P(Spades)

vernal spindle
#

1-Sin(-195)?

lilac pier
#

No no

fleet yew
#

What

vernal spindle
#

I don't know

fleet yew
#

Seems simple

#

Just trying to find sin(-195°)

#

Right?

#

Or is there something im missing

uncut mulch
#

no minus

lilac pier
#

you can try writing it as sin(180 + 15)

vernal spindle
#

can i then break it to sin(180)+sin(15)

lilac pier
#

Uh no

#

looks like you hvaen't been taught the addition formula

vernal spindle
#

ohh

#

sin(x)cos(y)+cos(x)sin(y)

lilac pier
#

this will get you -sin15

vernal spindle
#

how'd you get that

lilac pier
#

use the formula

vernal spindle
#

This is a basic question but whats the easiest way to calculate sin15

fleet yew
#

Exactly?

vernal spindle
#

yeah

fleet yew
#

Use half angle identities

vernal spindle
#

Why a half angle identity?

fleet yew
#

Sin(15) = sin(30/2)

#

What

jagged inlet
#

wrong chat

vernal spindle
#

So far I have

#

-1(sqrt((1-cosx)/2))

fleet yew
#

Yep

willow bear
#

uh

#

what's that -1 doing there

vernal spindle
#

cos(180)

willow bear
#

okay my bad

#

you were going for sin(195°) originally

#

i didn't scroll up

#

okay alright but

#

you don't have x, you have 30

#

presumably

#

since sin(15°) is what you want

#

so yknow

#

$\sin(15\dg) = \sqrt{\frac{1 - \cos(30\dg)}{2}}$

obsidian monolithBOT
willow bear
#

this is what you would have at this point

#

if you chose to use the half angle identity for sine that is

#

which is not the only way to go for 15° in particular mind you

#

there's one that may be a little bit easier in the sense of not requiring as much fucking around with roots within roots

#

and to reiterate kaynex's suggestion, it'd be rewriting sin(15°) as sin(45° - 30°)

#

and then using the angle difference identity

vernal spindle
#

i think thats easier i lost myself within all the roots

#

I got sqrt(6)-sqrt(2) over 4

willow bear
#

(sqrt(6) - sqrt(2))/4

#

yes

vernal spindle
#

negative^^

willow bear
#

that is correct

#

and now to get back to the original problem of sin(195°) you'll multiply that by -1

vernal spindle
#

wow i actually understand this that all helped a lot

vernal spindle
#

What exactly am I suppose to try to find

fleet yew
#

@vernal spindle what do you think you're supposed to find

vernal spindle
#

x?

#

So I need to get x alone

fleet yew
#

Yeah

#

Here is a secret hack

#

You can write cos^2(x) as 1-sin^2(x)

vernal spindle
#

3(1-sinx=2(1-sin^2(x))

fleet yew
#

Use the distributive property

uncut mulch
#

theres something more efficient

vernal spindle
#

Divide?

uncut mulch
#

no

#

consider rearranging the equation to the form:
stuff = 0
and factorising (1-sin^2(x))

vernal spindle
#

oh subtracting?

uncut mulch
#

is part of it

vernal spindle
#

3(1-sinx)-2(1-sin^2(x))=0

tight ravine
#

i have no idea how to do

uncut mulch
#

in use

vernal spindle
#

How could I factor 1-sin^2(x)?

uncut mulch
#

1-sin^2(x) = 1**^2** - sin**^2**(x)

vernal spindle
#

(1-sinx)^2 ?

uncut mulch
#

no

#

a^2 - b^2 = ...?

vernal spindle
#

(1+sinx)(1-sinx)

uncut mulch
#

yes

#

$3(1-\sin(x)) - 2(1-\sin(x))(1+\sin(x)) = 0$

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

can you factorise that further?

vernal spindle
#

would the 1-sin(x)'s be combined to (1-sin(x))^2

uncut mulch
#

wdym?

vernal spindle
#

wait i think thats wrong

#

erm

#

i dont see anything else

uncut mulch
#

do both terms have a common factor?

vernal spindle
#

sinx?

uncut mulch
#

no

vernal spindle
#

I don't think they do then

uncut mulch
#

(1- sin(x)) perhaps?

vernal spindle
#

I'd take that all the way out?

#

(1-sinx)(3-2(1+sinx))

uncut mulch
#

= 0

fleet yew
#

Got your signs mixed up

#

(1+sinx)(3-2(1-sinx))

uncut mulch
#

no the signs were fine

lethal warren
#

@tight ravine the points where the tangents intersect the graph are just the points where the gradient of the graph is -2/25

#

you just need to find dy/dx and make it equal to -2/25

fleet yew
#

Oh nvm

#

Didnt see those parantheses

uncut mulch
#

$3(1-\sin(x)) - 2(1-\sin(x))(1+\sin(x)) = 0 \
(1-\sin(x))( 3 - 2(1+\sin(x)) = 0$

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

can you continue from there?

vernal spindle
#

i dont see where i can go next

uncut mulch
#

zero product property

#

something i'm pretty sure you've applied countless times already

vernal spindle
#

oh

#

(1-sinx)=0 (3-2(1+sinx))=0

#

pi/2 and pi/6 ?

uncut mulch
#

what interval are you supposed to solve for?

vernal spindle
#

sin?

#

how would i know?

uncut mulch
#

they'd tell you

#

if they don't you'd need to provide the general solution

vernal spindle
#

would pi/2 and pi/6 be the general solution?

#

It just says solve the equation

uncut mulch
#

those would only be 2 of the solutions

vernal spindle
#

I'd have to keep adding?

uncut mulch
#

there is also more than 1 solution to
sin(x) = 1/2 in [0,2pi)

#

look up general solutions for trig and how to write them

vernal spindle
#

I I think she only wants the solutions between 0 - 2pi because we solved 2sin^2(x)-3sinx-1=0 and she said the solutions were pi/2 and 3pi/2

#

pi/2, pi/6, 5pi/6

uncut mulch
#

2sin^2(x)-3sinx-1=0 are you sure that was the correct equation

vernal spindle
#

+1

uncut mulch
#

x = 3pi/2 isn't a solution to 2sin^2(x) - 3 sin(x) + 1 = 0

vernal spindle
#

I don't know then, she had us rewrite it as 2t^2-3t+1=0 to make it look easier too

uncut mulch
#

depends on your preference

#

if you have no issue viewing it as a quadratic in sin(x) then sub isn't needed

vernal spindle
#

Let's see if i understand this, for 1+sinx=2cos^2(x) I got 3pi/2, 7pi/6, and 11pi/6

uncut mulch
#

,w solve 1+sinx=2cos^2(x) for 0<=x<=2pi

obsidian monolithBOT
vernal spindle
#

😦

uncut mulch
#

feels like you weren't careful with signs

#

is that supposed to be
1 + or 1 - sin(x)?

vernal spindle
#

I put 1+sin(x) instead 1-sinx when i factored it out

uncut mulch
#

either way, there's some issue with signs,
show your work

vernal spindle
#

I got it now pi/6 and 5pi/6

#

I had (1+sinx)(1-2(1+sinx)) after i factored it out instead of (1+sinx)(1-2(1-sinx)

uncut mulch
#

missing a ) at the very end but ok

vernal spindle
#

I'm working on my formula sheet but I can't figure out how you get the vertex for intercept form

uncut mulch
#

axis of symmetry/ x-coord of the vertex will be the average of the zeros

lethal warren
harsh cipher
#

good afternoon

#

ok....

#

range y=f(x) = 0<=y<=4

#

range of y= rootf(x) + 2

willow bear
#

P

#

A

#

R

#

E

#

N

#

T

#

H

#

E

#

S

#

E

harsh cipher
#

hahah

#

Hello Ann

willow bear
#

S

#

did you mean $\sqrt{f(x)+2}$ or $\sqrt{f(x)} + 2$

harsh cipher
#

where did I do it wrong?

obsidian monolithBOT
harsh cipher
#

second

willow bear
#

these are sqrt(f(x) + 2) and sqrt(f(x)) + 2 respectively

harsh cipher
#

I will take a note, write the closing sign after x

#

then +2

#

Thank you!

#

y=sqrt(f(x))+ 2

#

anyways

#

the reason why y>=2 is we sub in 0 for f(x) ?

#

so 2<=y<=4

willow bear
#

0 ≤ f(x) ≤ 4 implies 0 ≤ sqrt(f(x)) ≤ 2 implies 2 ≤ sqrt(f(x))+2 ≤ 4

harsh cipher
#

I did not get that...

#

could you explain it easier please?

willow bear
#

this is as elementary as i could possibly go

#

so give it another dozen rereads

harsh cipher
#

sure

#

will do

rare zephyr
#

No. 3

#

Ive expanded the expression and substitute tan with sin/cos then substitute them back into my equation but uhhhhhh now Im stuck

#

I look back at the question just to have myself more confused on what to do

uncut mulch
#

draw some triangles

rare zephyr
#

Right angle triangles?

uncut mulch
#

apply the given information

rare zephyr
#

Owhhhh

#

Got it

#

I know what to do know thx

uncut mulch
#

note: make sure to watch the signs and quadrants

brittle fable
#

when taking the composition ( f  ∘ g ) ( x ) and we call the new function h(x)

#

is h(x) effectively the same as f(x) if we change the domain of f to be the same as the domain of g?

willow bear
#

no

#

h(x) is f(g(x))

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
#

what

#
  1. your question doesn’t make sense
#
  1. this isn’t the right channel
#
  1. don’t double post
cedar cosmos
#

Becuz the dg cancels out

vernal spindle
#

I'm solving cos(2t)=sin(t) I turned it to 1-2sin^2(t)=sin(t) then subtracted sin(t) getting 1-2sin^2(t)-sin(t)=0 but now im stuck

tawny nacelle
#

its a quadratic in sin(t)

pale bison
#

personally that's too much work

#

maybe use\$\sin(\theta)=\cos(\theta-\frac\theta2)$

obsidian monolithBOT
willow bear
#

pub thonkEyes

#

big wrong

vernal spindle
#

I was seeing if I could get a, b, c but i dont think i can because the 1- infront

willow bear
#

huh?

vernal spindle
#

I think im trying to apply the wrong method

#

So far I have 1-2sin^2(t)-sin(t)=0

willow bear
#

oh that. sorry, didn't see your message earlier

#

what if i were to tell you that this is the same as (-2)sin^2(t) + (-1)sin(t) + 1 = 0

#

and that this is indeed a quadratic in sin(t)

vernal spindle
#

Would it be

#

-2sin^2(t)-2sin(t)+sin(t)+1

willow bear
#

where'd the =0 go

#

anyway if you wanna solve this by factorization go ahead ig

vernal spindle
#

-2sin^2(t)-2sin(t)+sin(t)+1=0

#

I think i made it worst, i have -2(sin^2(t)+sin(t))+(sin(t)+1)

novel dirge
#

yesterday I got help here with writing set operation expressions for probability

#

but when I sent it to my teacher, she said that 2 are wrong

#

and that I should use + instead of U and that I shouldn't use n at all

#

e. Of the events A and B, only one happened
f. Of the events A,B and C, 2 happened

#

for e I wrote (AUB)

#

and for f

#

(AnBnC')U(AnB'nC)U(A'nBnC)

#

but it looks like they were somehow wrong

#

she didn't want to tell me what was wrong but told a friend of mine who copied everything from me

vernal spindle
#

I solved the -2sin^2(t)-2sin(t)+sin(t)+1=0 using the quadratic equation and got -1 and 1/2

willow bear
#

you got sin(t) = -1 and sin(t) = 1/2.

vernal spindle
#

How do I know it's sin(t)= thats where i got lost

willow bear
#

what else could it be? what were you solving for?

#

you can make a substitution, u := sin(t)

#

then your equation will become -2u^2 - 2u + u + 1 = 0

#

and you'll get two sols: u = -1, u = 1/2

#

does that make sense to you

vernal spindle
#

ohh i see it now

#

so 3pi/2, pi/6, and 5pi/6

willow bear
#

👏

vernal spindle
#

What can i do next in cos(2x)cos(x)+sin(2x)sin(x)-1=0

heady jewel
#

whats cos(A+B)

#

try relating it to your q

vernal spindle
#

cosxcosy-sinxsiny

heady jewel
#

whats cos(2x+(-x)) now

vernal spindle
#

Why not cos(x-y)?

heady jewel
#

lmao cos(x-y)=cos(x+(-y))

#

but you can be stubborn and directly use cos(x-y)

#

go on

vernal spindle
#

cos(2x-x)-1=0

heady jewel
#

👍

vernal spindle
#

What do I do with that

heady jewel
#

can you solve cos(x)=1?

vernal spindle
#

How did you get that

heady jewel
#

whats x+x

vernal spindle
#

2x?

heady jewel
#

whats x+x-x

vernal spindle
#

x

heady jewel
#

=2x-x

vernal spindle
#

Ohh I see it now

#

cos(x)=1

#

so 0?

heady jewel
#

do you know that cosine of any multiple of 2pi=1

#

better get a general form

#

so like x=2pi*k where k \in the integers

#

would be the general form

cosmic cargo
#

Hello! This is my first time in this server is anybody able to help me with a trigonometry problem 😌

heady jewel
cosmic cargo
#

How do I find the intersection points of polar equations r = 2 and r = 4sin2theta?

vernal spindle
lilac pier
#

4th line

#

He did

tardy ridge
#

I thought he was using a trig identity

#

that's just the question

#

whoops

#

yeah fourth line you have to subtract

#

you can't multiply

lilac pier
#

@vernal spindle The mistake is that after the 3rd line, you should've added sinx - 1 on both sides, then on the RHS you have 0.

#

after that you can factorize

vernal spindle
#

ohh

#

I need to get rid of the subtraction and get multiplication so i can find the zeros right?

lilac pier
#

If you mean factorize, then yeah factorizing is better

#

After adding sinx - 1 on both sides, you get

#

$[1 + \sin(x)][1 - \sin(x)] + \sin(x) - 1 = 0$

obsidian monolithBOT
vernal spindle
#

then, 1sin(x)((1+sin(x))-1)

lilac pier
#

What can you do now

vernal spindle
#

?

#

if i take out sin(x)

lilac pier
#

From where?

#

No need to factor out sin x

#

Just use this

#

sinx - 1 = -(1 - sinx)

#

Now you have -(1-sinx) in both the terms, so factor this out

#

$[1 + \sin(x)][1 - \sin(x)] - [1 - \sin(x)] = 0$

obsidian monolithBOT
vernal spindle
#

factor out (1-sin(x))?

lilac pier
#

Yes

vernal spindle
#

Would it be (1-sinx)((1+sinx)-1)

lilac pier
#

Yes = 0

#

Now either (1-sinx) = 0, (1+sinx) - 1 =0

#

or both

#

so check it out

vernal spindle
#

for 1-sinx=0 i got pi/2

lilac pier
#

Okay.

#

For the other one?

vernal spindle
#

0, pi, 2pi

lilac pier
#

Or you can write npi, where n is any integer.

#

For the first one, you can write pi/2 + 2npi, where n is any integer.

vernal spindle
#

I keep understanding the problem but when i see the next problem i don't get it again :/

#

like now for cos(x)sin(x)=cos(x), i took -cos(x) and got cos(x)sin(x)-cos(x)=0 and im stuck

patent spruce
#

whats a pi?

hollow oar
#

id oint knw o

#

i need help with 7th grade math

patent spruce
#

can yo please hepl explen

hollow oar
#

is this for only colege kids i need help my teacher called my mom

patent spruce
#

i got a lunch detenction at hom

hollow oar
#

that stink

patent spruce
#

and now i hove bruses on my behynd

hollow oar
#

what category is 7tyh grade math in

lilac pier
#

@vernal spindle Factor out cosx

#

@hollow oar Try the sections pre-university

vernal spindle
#

cosx(sinx-1)=0?

hollow oar
#

im 7th grade

lilac pier
#

Yes

vernal spindle
#

pi/2 and 3pi/2

lilac pier
#

both should be pi/2

#

Now for sinx = 1, you can write x = pi/2 + 2npi, where n is any integer.

#

Try to think of what you can write for cosx=0

vernal spindle
#

I think i just need to find the values between 0-2pi

lilac pier
#

Oh okay

vernal spindle
#

For cosx-5sin(2x)=0, first i applied cosx-5(2sinxcosx)=0

lilac pier
#

Good.

#

You got the hang of it

vernal spindle
#

I'm kind of stuck here

lilac pier
#

Factor out cosx

vernal spindle
#

cosx(1-(5(2sinx))) loke that?

#

no

#

erm

lilac pier
#

$\cos(x)[1 - 10\sin(x)] = 0$

obsidian monolithBOT
vernal spindle
#

I got cosx=0 and sinx=1/10

lilac pier
#

yeah

vernal spindle
#

I know cosx=0 is pi/2 and 3pi/2

#

but sinx=1/10 i dont know

lilac pier
#

@vernal spindle Sorry was gone

acoustic harbor
#

the arcsin of (1/10)

lilac pier
#

Well it's just arcsin(1/10) like nelson said and if you look at the graph of the sin function, that's the only solution in the range 0-2pi

acoustic harbor
#

doesn't -arcsin(1/10) work

vernal spindle
#

Is that the same as sin^-1(1/10

acoustic harbor
#

yes

vernal spindle
#

So the answer is pi/2, 3pi/2, and sin^-1(1/10)

vernal spindle
#

For sin^2(x)+sin(x)-2=0 I got sinx=-2 and sinx=1

#

What do I do with sinx=-2

dusk elm
#

How can you isolate x?

vernal spindle
#

take sin^-1

dusk elm
#

applying the inverse operation seems like a good idea

vernal spindle
#

so x=sin^-1(-2) is it?

#

I know sinx=1 is pi/2

dusk elm
#

I think you may have done the problem wrong because sin will always take a value between -1 and 1

vernal spindle
tardy ridge
#

What

#

What is the problem

vernal spindle
tardy ridge
#

well then it means it's not a solution

dusk elm
#

Took me a second but solving you get sin(x)=-2 so there is not solution for that one

#

so you only solution is pi/2 for [0,2pi]

vernal spindle
#

ah makes sense

vernal spindle
viscid thistle
#

if it has that shape

#

that means we can achieve our goal through simple translations

#

so the vertex is currently at (0,0) for 2x^2

vernal spindle
#

yea

viscid thistle
#

and it also contains the point (1,2)

#

no, 2x^2 contains (1,2)

past meadow
#

yeah i realised what you meant lmao

viscid thistle
#

we want it to contain (1,1)

#

(1,2) is 1 unit above (1,1)

#

so what do we need to do?

#

oh wait

#

scratch that

#

the final equation will come in the form 2(x-h)^2 + k

#

where (h,k) is the vertex

#

if (h,k) is the vertex, what is h?

#

@vernal spindle

vernal spindle
#

one of them is 0 right

#

since its on the y axis

viscid thistle
#

h is 0

#

so the final equation will be in the form 2x^2 + k

#

the point (1,1) is on this equation

#

this means that 1 = 2(1)^2 + k

#

what is k?

vernal spindle
#

Do I plug in the other values and solve for k

viscid thistle
#

yes

#

i just did that

vernal spindle
#

how did you get the 1 for y

viscid thistle
#

it says that (1,1) is on the equation

vernal spindle
#

ohh

#

k=-1

viscid thistle
#

yes

vernal spindle
#

y=2(x-0)^2-1

viscid thistle
#

yeah

full garden
#

hey guys very silly question but can someone please explain how i can get that 165 point? like I was able to get the rest of them but for some reason couldn't figure out the 165

patent beacon
#

It's half way between 120 and 210

#

So their average

full garden
#

omg i actually love u wth i was watching this tutorial and the guy was like we have to add 90 to the period and stuff omg thank u so much that helps alot

patent beacon
#

120 → 165 is a quarter period. So +45

full garden
#

omg yes i think that's what he was mentioning ❤️ thank you so much love u bro thank you so much really

vernal spindle
#

I'm trying to solve this problem again for practice but i cant figure out how to get sin and cos for the first one, so far i turned sin(2x) to 2sin(x)cos(x)

lilac pier
#

you have tan theta, you can make a right angled triangle with the given sides, find the unknown side

#

find sin and cos theta

vernal spindle
#

3^2+4^2=x^2 ?

lilac pier
#

Yeah

vernal spindle
#

ah i got it

#

but what about the negative

lilac pier
#

in the second quarant sin is positive, so keep it as it is

#

only cos will be negative

analog relic
#

$\tan{\theta}=-\frac{3}{4} \implies \frac{opp}{adj}=\frac{3}{4} \implies $ By Pythagoras' Theorem, $hyp=\sqrt{opp^{2}+adj^{2}}=\sqrt{3^2+4^2}=5 \implies \frac{opp}{hyp}=\frac{3}{5}$ and $\frac{adj}{hyp}=-\frac{4}{5}$ (because it is in the second quadrant) $\sin{2\theta}=2\sin{\theta}\cos{\theta}=2(\frac{3}{5})(-\frac{4}{5})=-\frac{24}{25}$

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
#

Why tan is negative but opp and adj are both positives

steel venture
#

its unit circle

uncut mulch
#

dodgy explanation

willow bear
#

i was about to say just that

#

i could repeat my suggestion of doing it purely algebraically

#

using tan^2(x) + 1 = sec^2(x) to get sec^2(x), then from that get cos^2(x), then cos(x), then sin(x), then everything else

fleet yew
#

@viscid thistle he's just talking about the sides of the triangle

#

lengths are positive numbers

viscid thistle
#

Ah yes I'm stupid realshit

viscid thistle
#

But if tan is the quotient of two lengths how can it be negative realshit

fleet yew
#

by convention. we assign negative values to tangent in the second and fourth quadrant

willow bear
#

uh no

#

tan(x) is just sin(x)/cos(x) sully

#

don't call it a convention when it isn't

fleet yew
#

i mean i was thinking more along the lines of that up and right being positive is a convention in the cartesian coordinate system

willow bear
#

nothing to do with tan

viscid thistle
#

When we use tan with radians I'm ok that it can be negative

#

But when we work with triangles

#

If tan is a quotient between two lengths how can it be negative? Or how can cos or sin be negatives?

willow bear
#

if you're working with triangles then your angles are constrained to (0, pi/2) and your trig functions are all positive

viscid thistle
#

Oh ok

proper pulsar
#

This is hard lol

onyx pagoda
#

I have a question if someone can dn me that would be great

lilac pier
willow bear
#

i dm'd them about it.

south forum
lost mesa
#

do you know what a composition of functions is

south forum
#

no i just started doing this

#

im so confused

lost mesa
#

ok so

willow bear
lost mesa
#

$$(f \circ g)(x) = f(g(x))$$

obsidian monolithBOT
south forum
#

o ok

#

so.

#

do i just

#

plug in the x

#

with 4

#

and multiply

#

f x g

lost mesa
#

no

#

theres a difference between the closed circle and opened circle

#

the closed circle means multiply (i can't remember the latex code for it)

#

the open circle means composition

willow bear
#

no, you don't multiply anything

lost mesa
#

you take the result of g(x) as your input for the function f(x)

willow bear
#

to calculate g(f(4)), the first step is to calculate f(4).

south forum
#

omg thats not a multiplication sign im so dumb

lost mesa
#

but in your problem it's g(f(4))

#

^

south forum
#

ohh ok

tropic hare
#

Mhm.

south forum
#

omg im crying

#

ok so like

#

what do i do to start it then

willow bear
#

did i not say exactly what to do?

lost mesa
#

$$(g \circ f)(x) = g(f(x))$$

obsidian monolithBOT
lost mesa
#

you're given f(x) and g(x) and x=4

south forum
#

yes

lost mesa
#

to calculate g(f(4)), the first step is to calculate f(4).

willow bear
#

on the other hand, some people choose not to listen to me. or they choose not to tell me when something i've said confuses them, instead opting to remain silent.

#

bit of a shame, really.

lost mesa
#

you take the result of f(4)

#

and plug that into function g

south forum
#

ohh ok that makes more sense thx, and srry @willow bear didnt see but
thanks both of you for the help

tardy ridge
south forum
#

thx @tardy ridge

carmine elbow
#

I need help with a half-life problem

vague minnow
#

Hey, I have a question on how to solve this equation. I think I've made some progress, I got a simpler looking equation, but can't figure out what to do next

tardy ridge
#

@vague minnow I think i got it, do you have the answer so I can verify

vague minnow
#

no I don't unfortunately

#

oh wait

#

actually I do

#

yeah I do

#

what did you get

tardy ridge
#

well I haven't checked it over

#

one of them is 1 and -3

#

then I have a quadratic formula thing

#

which I haven't simplified yet

vague minnow
#

hm

#

the teacher didn't give the answer

#

but wolframalpha says the answer is 1/2

tardy ridge
#

hmmm ok I will try it again

#

weird

#

I have -3 and 1

vague minnow
#

hm, -3 and 1 shouldn't fit because the log_x thing on the left has x as base, so x should be positive and not equal to 1 🤔

tardy ridge
#

you are right

#

but I still have 1

#

do you want to see what I did

vague minnow
#

sure

tardy ridge
vague minnow
#

hmmm

#

it all makes sense

tardy ridge
#

well no x=1 means log 1 = 0

#

so it's undefined

#

but it looks like I can't get the 1/2 solution

vague minnow
#

oh I think I got it

tardy ridge
#

what did you do

vague minnow
#

I think you made a small mistake

#

it should be log(3-2x) = -log(x)

tardy ridge
#

OHHHHHHHH

#

ah well that's good

vague minnow
#

thanks for your help dude, very much appreciated 🙂

tardy ridge
#

Glad it worked

carmine elbow
#

Can you help me with my problem?@tardy ridge

tardy ridge
#

what is your problem

carmine elbow
#

I’ll show you

tardy ridge
#

I dunno if I can solve it

#

ok

carmine elbow
#

I’m doing number 14 and I’m trying to find the decay constant k

tardy ridge
#

I have not learned this

carmine elbow
#

Oh

#

Do you know anyone on this server that knows half life?

vague minnow
#

oh half-life

#

I'm not familiar with English terms but.

#

is it nuclear physics?

#

it seems like it

tardy ridge
#

I've only seen half life 3 memes

vague minnow
#

ha

#

yeah

#

isn't that where they got the name from

carmine elbow
#

🤷🏾‍♀️

vague minnow
#

hm

#

when I plug in the half-life

#

I need to convert it into seconds, right?

#

cause that's like the standard thing

#

cause if that's the case

#

then it would be this

pale pond
#

can someone help me with my trig identity stuff

#

i'm not sure wehre to0 start

hardy abyss
#

try factoring out sec^2(x)tan^2(x)

pale pond
#

thank you

pale pond
#

can someone help me with 7

lost mesa
#

try multiplying $\frac{\tan x}{1 + \sec x}by\frac{\sec x-1}{\sec x-1}$

obsidian monolithBOT
lost mesa
#

actually i got a faster way for you

#

express tan and sec in terms of sin and cos

#

@pale pond