#precalculus

1 messages · Page 211 of 1

vernal spindle
#

so 1/cos

fleet yew
#

Which is ?

vernal spindle
#

sec

#

ohh i got it

proud gate
#

I have this word problem with two ducks walking away from a spot.
I found how much more one has moved than the other but i cant figure out how to solve how far apart they are from eachother

fleet yew
#

@proud gate what Is it

proud gate
#

Duck 1 = (12,5)
Duck 2 = (13,8)

#

I need to find how far apart they are from eachother

opal shell
#

if you want the exact displacement you can use pythagoras theorem

proud gate
#

But i dont know the two sides

opal shell
#

13-12

#

=1

#

8-5=3

#

and then you get the hypotenuse, which is the displacement from duck 1 to duck 2

neon garden
#

Can someone explain how to solve e^(2 + ln3)? I don’t really understand what to do

remote veldt
#

@neon garden just so you know, "solve" refers to equations not expressions, ie determining the identity of an unknown. in this case, you're looking to simplify. I'm not letting you know to be a dick, it's just important to use words in a way that people understand.

To simplify e^(2 + ln3), first use the rule that e^(a + b) = e^a * e^b, so you can turn this into

e^2 * e^(ln 3)

You can then use the property that e^(ln (x)) = x

e^2 * e^(ln(3)) = e^2 * 3

So your final answer is 3e^2

vernal spindle
#

First i rewrote tan as sin/cos

uncut mulch
#

what are you being asked to do?

deft fox
#

help

pale bison
#

what have you tried?

#

it's useful to start naming stuff first...
let x be the population of bacteria
let h be the hours required

#

and so on..

#

@deft fox

willow bear
#

let h be the hours required
uh oh stinky

pale bison
#

well what's wrong with that

willow bear
#

nvm

pale bison
#

??

#

ok then, keep your secrets

frigid sapphire
#

hello

#

can someone help me with a math proof

#

line segment BA is congruent to ED

#

line segment AC is congruent to DF

#

line segment BE is congruent to CF

#

BE = CF (SAP? Reflexive?)

#

EC = EC (Reflexive?)

#

BE + EC = EC + CF

#

is this correct?

undone pawn
#

yeah, seems right

frigid sapphire
#

ok BE = CF is SAP or reflexive?

#

thanks

#

I'll be in questions Beta

midnight sand
#

Uh idk if this is considered precalc in US terms because im in canada but for quadratic inequalities, is the y the answer area or is the a(x-p)^2+q (like y > a(x-p)^2+q)

#

because i'm having trouble on figuring out which way the inequality sign goes when looking at a shaded parabola

rigid beacon
#

can you send an actual problem/example cause I can't tell what you mean from your original wording @midnight sand

midnight sand
#

So you know when graphing a quadratic inequality the answer isn’t a point but a shaded area?

#

Would the shaded area (the answer) be y when written y > a(x-p)^2+q? Aka vertex form?

rigid beacon
#

an equality is typically an area

#

so like

#

y > x^2 would be an area

#

it would be the shaded area of all y-values greater than the function x^2

#

it doesn't have to be vertex form

#

@midnight sand

fresh sparrow
#

((t-7)^2)^2 = (t-7)^4?

fleet yew
#

Yes

#

@fresh sparrow

#

Dont be dumb

fresh sparrow
#

Thanks. I'm working on a bigger problem. Just making sure. hahaha

fleet yew
#

👍

fresh sparrow
#

I had a subtraction mistake lol. It was causing me to subtract instead of having addition.

slate oracle
#

Is this not an identity

#

?

sour hemlock
#

Is this a multiple choice question?

solar valley
#

no

#

sin(pi-theta)=-sin(-theta)=sin(theta)

slate oracle
#

yEAH

#

@solar valley So it is an identity?

#

I'm so confused.

solar valley
#

no

#

sin x =/= -cos x

slate oracle
#

So my answer was correct, right?

solar valley
#

if you picked C yeah

slate oracle
#

this is tupfo0iusadodufodsi

#

How is this one incorrect?

sour hemlock
#

it is c

#

not d

slate oracle
#

How so?

sour hemlock
#

sorry wait

#

well taking the inverse cos of a negative number should also add in a 180

#

if I remember

#

so the answer seems to be none of these

slate oracle
#

uhh what

sour hemlock
#

y = -3cos(7x)
-y/3 = cos(7x)
acos(-y/3) = 7x
pi - acos(y/3) = 7x

willow bear
#

the function they're giving doesn't have a true inverse unless you pretend that cos does

sour hemlock
#

that is true

#

I assumed it does

#

in this case

#

because no assumptions on limits of x and f(x) were given here

slate oracle
#

What crack is my teacher on.

willow bear
#

dunno but it checks out, even if you forget about cos not having a true inverse there is no right answer here so mb you should ask your teacher directly what crack they're on

slate oracle
#

So.. there's no inverse function..?

#

WHat

willow bear
#

none of the answers are correct

slate oracle
#

Isn't it

#

c. but with -x/3?

sour hemlock
#

no

willow bear
#

no

slate oracle
#

Can you guys show your work. I'm so confused.

sour hemlock
#

y = -3cos(7x)
-y/3 = cos(7x)
acos(-y/3) = 7x
pi - acos(y/3) = 7x
x = 1/7 (pi - acos(y/3))

slate oracle
#

lmfao what

#

we find for y

#

not x

#

We're finding the inverse

#

noo..?

sour hemlock
#

that is just a dummy variable

#

f(x) = y

willow bear
#

"find for y" thonk

slate oracle
#

I don't know

#

This is making it more confusing.

willow bear
#

do you know how to find the inverse of a function

sour hemlock
#

I just did it with y to make it easier to type here

willow bear
#

in general

sour hemlock
#

you can replace y with f(x) and do it again, wouldn't make a difference

slate oracle
#

we make f(x) a variable, presumably y

#

switch x and y

#

and we find y

sour hemlock
#

right

#

everyone has their own personal favorite method

#

I switch x and y in the end

#

doesn't make a difference

slate oracle
#

So, @willow bear , is zimmer's answer correct?

sour hemlock
#

well I hope so lol

slate oracle
#

I'm not trying to be rude, just trying to confirm

#

I hope you understand ❤️

willow bear
#

yes zimmer's answer seems correct

slate oracle
#

Thank you so much

#

I'll be discussing my two supposed "incorrect" answers with my teacher.

slate oracle
#

wops

#

sorry

#

didn't mean to post

blazing parrot
#

draw a right angle triangle, remember pythagoras

#

then set hypo to r i guess'

#

you can draw a right triangle inside the circle

#

based on quadrant

#

i not sure how else

#

unless you mess around with all the sin^2 + cos^2 identies

#

wat

narrow peak
#

y u delete

sturdy haven
#

I got number a and b but C IS CONFUZ

blazing parrot
#

sin theta < 0 what does that tell you about the quadrant of theta

sturdy haven
#

It bools me that that means dat it be in da THIRD QUADRANT HOOD

#

Ir fourth quadrant

#

But WE KNOW TAN IS NGETIBE

#

so the at tells me that the cos boi boutta be positive

#

So we be bein in da fourth quadrant

blazing parrot
#

yes not how i expected but yes

sturdy haven
#

Now wat

blazing parrot
#

you can use this to do the Question

sturdy haven
#

The fricken frick is the q

blazing parrot
#

by same methods as the others

sturdy haven
#

-15/8=sin/cos

#

IM SOLVIN FOR TWO VARIABLES MAN

#

Im freakin out

#

Oh shet

#

HWO DO I DO

rigid beacon
#

The trig ratios are ratios

#

they're ratios of sides of a triangle

#

so draw out the triangle

sturdy haven
#

Aight aight aigjt

#

I drew it dawg

#

HELP

#

I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT DO PUT ON IT

#

I JUST DRAW A TRIANGLE

#

aaaaa

blazing parrot
#

put a theta in corner which isnt the right angle

#

label sides

#

with varibles

sturdy haven
#

I did it

#

Now wat

blazing parrot
#

what is tan theta

sturdy haven
#

-15/8

blazing parrot
#

in terms of the variables

sturdy haven
#

Y/X

blazing parrot
#

so we can set Y to -15 and X to 8

sturdy haven
#

WOAH

#

IS THAT POSSIBLE???

blazing parrot
#

its one of the possible values

sturdy haven
#

ooo

blazing parrot
#

lets say in our triangle its those values

#

now whats the last side

sturdy haven
#

17

blazing parrot
#

whats sin theta

sturdy haven
#

-15

blazing parrot
#

um sin theta != Y

sturdy haven
#

Ohhh

#

-15/17

blazing parrot
#

yes!

#

similar methods to find the other trigo functions

sturdy haven
#

BUT BOY YOU INLY SAID IT IS POSSIBLE VALUE THERE ARE SOOOOLOOO MANY POSSIBEL GALUES

blazing parrot
#

you seee

#

all the other possible values are having Y = -c15 and X= c8 for some constant c

#

so that Y/X = -15/8

#

than the last side is sqrt((-c15)^2 + (c8)^2) = sqrt(c^2)(17)

#

= 17c

#

so -15c/17c = -15/17

#

the result would be the same

sturdy haven
#

Wait so I did the other problems with the unit circle

#

Like when it said give sin i just use puthagoraan identifiy

#

For other bromblemss

undone pawn
#

lmao

#

are you just a troll

sturdy haven
#

Who was speaking to you

#

You absolute piece of cake

undone pawn
#

if you are, you're one of the nicer ones i gotta say

blazing parrot
#

well yes you can

sturdy haven
#

Okayz thank for help

grizzled totem
#

Why is this correct?

#

BUC means in B or C so I'd shade everything in B or C and \ A means not A and A` means not A

willow bear
#

no

#

that would be (B u C) \ A, or (B u C) n A'

#

but it would not be (B u C) \ A'

grizzled totem
#

Thank you so much

willow bear
#

(B u C) \ A' is everything in B u C but not in A'

#

but

grizzled totem
#

So this means \ and ` does something

#

if together

willow bear
#

not in A' is the same thing as in A

#

because double negation

#

$X \setminus A' = X \cap A$

obsidian monolithBOT
grizzled totem
#

Double negation!

#

I needed this

#

Ok so if you double negate it

#

How do I then go from

#

to

willow bear
#

i already said it. $(B \cup C) \setminus A' = (B \cup C) \cap A$

obsidian monolithBOT
grizzled totem
#

ohhhh

#

I still don't understand

fluid shore
#

The bottom three portions you shaded are in A'

willow bear
#

the bit at the top isn't in B u C

fluid shore
#

This is why venn diagrams are a disgusting way of teaching set theory 😩

willow bear
#

meh they're an okay visual aid imo

grizzled totem
#

ok so that's A'

#

i don't even know why I shaded the A

#

I shade the A because apparently BUC\A' is the same as BUCnA

willow bear
#

parentheses!!!

viscid thistle
#

is it just x(t) = 3cos(t) and y(t) = 5cos(t) ?

stuck lark
#

how you can check if the parametrization is ok is to plug x(t) & y(t) into the ellipse eqn and see if what you get is true for all t

odd helm
fleet yew
#

@odd helm

#

Degree of top minus degree of bottom

odd helm
#

Alright thanks

winter isle
#

#33

#

what’s a row equivalent matrix ??

#

tag if answering plz

stuck lark
#

two matrices are row equivalent if one can be changed into the other via a series of row operations @winter isle

winter isle
#

my answer was 2 for the missing number, is that correct?

stuck lark
#

sure

winter isle
#

:)

#

ty

stuck lark
#

yw

viscid thistle
#

What is the difference between PCalc and Calc

lost mesa
#

pcalc teaches fundamental knowledge that will be used in calc

viscid thistle
#

Delightful

carmine elbow
#

Hi everyone! I am new to this server and need some assistance

#

I’m using the distance formula for the problem. I got this far, but I’m not sure what to do next.

late pewter
#

The question is to just find the distance between the two points?

lost mesa
#

your distance formula isn't right, unless im seeing smth wrong

late pewter
#

distance formula seems correct, just parentheses are kind of whack

lost mesa
#

yea ok

#

personally, i feel like this isn't a needed step

#

$2-\frac{3}{2} = \frac{1}{2}$

obsidian monolithBOT
lost mesa
#

we can prove this two ways
fraction subtraction: 4/2 - 3/2 = 1/2
decimals: 2 - 1.5 = .5, or 1/2

carmine elbow
#

the fraction way looks more familiar

#

how did you get 4/2?

uncut mulch
#

2 * 2/2 = 4/2

carmine elbow
#

why are you multiplying and not substracting 2 - 3/2?

uncut mulch
#

that intermediate step was done to get a common denominator

carmine elbow
#

can you show me that step?

late pewter
#

its just the step you did

#

2/2 * 2 - 3/2 = 4/2 - 3/2

uncut mulch
#

$2 - \frac32 = 2\cdot\frac22 - \frac32 = \frac42 - \frac32 = \frac{4-3}{2}$

obsidian monolithBOT
carmine elbow
#

I'm still confused.

late pewter
#

which step are you confused on

carmine elbow
#

the multiplication

late pewter
#

2 * 2/2?

#

are you confused to as why you do it or how its equal to 4/2

carmine elbow
#

why I do it?

#

I know you explained it already

uncut mulch
#

to get a common denominator for adding/subtracting fractions

carmine elbow
#

ok

#

what about the 2?

uncut mulch
#

which 2?

#

2 is being converted to a fraction with a denominator of 2. i.e. 4/2

carmine elbow
#

The 2 before that

#

why is that there?

uncut mulch
#

uh which 2?

late pewter
#

2 = 2 * 1 = 2 * 2/2

carmine elbow
#

yes

late pewter
#

this 2? ^

carmine elbow
#

yes

uncut mulch
#

there are 5 2s there...

carmine elbow
#

2 * 2/2

#

This one

lost mesa
#

ah yeah okay, thanks for pointing it out ramonov

carmine elbow
#

sorry about that

uncut mulch
#

there are 3 2s now
but wdym why is it there?

late pewter
#

the left one?

#

the left one is just there from the distance formula

#

you wrote it yourself in your work

carmine elbow
#

the 2 that is multiplied by 2/2

uncut mulch
#

2- 3/2 was what you originally had. if 1/2 isn't immediately obvious,
you would multiply 2 by 2/2 (i.e. 1) to get a common denominator of 2

#

do you agree that $2 \times \frac22 = 2 \times 1 = 2$?

obsidian monolithBOT
carmine elbow
#

yes

uncut mulch
#

and that $2 \times \frac22 = \frac42$

obsidian monolithBOT
carmine elbow
#

yes

uncut mulch
#

and that $2 - \frac32 = 2 \times \frac22 - \frac32 = \frac42 - \frac32$

obsidian monolithBOT
carmine elbow
#

no

late pewter
#

$2 - \frac32 = 2 \times 1 - \frac32 = 2 \times \frac22 - \frac32 = \frac42 - \frac32$

obsidian monolithBOT
late pewter
#

does that make sense ^?

carmine elbow
#

is that 2/1 - 3/2?

#

and the 2/1 becomes 4/2?

lost mesa
#

yes

uncut mulch
#

pretty much

late pewter
#

um that works too

lost mesa
#

then you subtract the numerators

carmine elbow
#

Wow, I can't believe it took me that long 🙄

#

Thank you for being patient! Sorry it took me soo long to figure it out

odd helm
late pewter
#

you can find what the boundary of x^2-y^2 < 1 is equal to

#

then you can pick a point to determine the direction to shade

dense crater
#

YES

odd helm
#

I’m still confused on my question what do you mean by boundary

spiral beacon
#

@odd helm i think boundary means the shape

#

ie. circle, hyperbola, parabola etc

#

and the "boundary" would be the line of the graph

odd helm
#

It’s a circle isn’t it? And it has a radius of 1 and the values are less than 1

#

So idk why my answer was incorrect

lost mesa
#

if it was a circle, wouldn't it be x^2 + y^2 < 1 instead of x^2 - y^2 < 1

odd helm
#

Oh yeah

#

Ok tbh I forgot how to do hyperbolas so I’ll review that

#

Thank you

lost mesa
#

lmao np

spiral beacon
#

ye its minus not addition

viscid thistle
#

hey!
i have a quick question -- what are the extremas of r^2=64 sin 2theta
These are my answers in (R,theta)

#

but my teacher isnt approving it

remote veldt
#

@viscid thistle This is in polar coordinates right? that polar equation isn't a function. It's a relation - it outputs the cricle x^2 + (y + 4)^2 = 4^2

#

and

#

x^2 + (y - 4)^2 = 4^2

#

wait oops is that sin^2(theta) or sin(2theta)

viscid thistle
#

Ye

#

Sin (2theta)

#

My bad

#

So no circle

remote veldt
#

in that case

#

the r^2 means you have the positive and negative

#

ie your thing will be symmetric about the x-axis

viscid thistle
#

Interesting

remote veldt
#

fuck*

viscid thistle
#

Yeah it should be theta?

#

So about the origin

remote veldt
#

wait 🤔 yeah idk nvm

#

fuck oop

fleet yew
#

that is a sideways 8

spiral beacon
#

how do u do this

willow bear
#

express the periods of sin(x/k) and of cot(3kx) in terms of k

spiral beacon
#

2pik and pi/3k

#

and 2(pi)k<pi/3k right

#

my interval of k is (-1/√6, 1/√6)

#

suggesting that the answer is A

#

but k cant be 0 so is the answer B?

winter isle
#

what is the difference between row eschelon form and reduce row echelon form

#

ping if you answer please

limber compass
stuck lark
#

@winter isle
a matrix is in ref if:
all nonzero rows are above all zero rows
each leading entry is to the right of the above row's leading entry

a matrix is in rref if:
it is in ref
each leading entry is a 1
each leading entry is the only nonzero entry in its own column

limber compass
#

@stuck lark mind helping me later : ) ?

winter isle
#

okay thank you

#

so rref is all ones and zeros

stuck lark
#

not always

fleet yew
#

You are thinking of an identity matrix

#

Which is different from rref

limber compass
#

I need help lol.

#

scroll up if anyone hasn't seen ^

#

thanx.

fleet yew
#

@limber compass what was the question lol

limber compass
fleet yew
#

What was the question

limber compass
#

I feel like the equations I formed are wrong lol.

#

Oh.

#

like the full thing.

fleet yew
#

I mean there is nothing to solve for here

limber compass
#

Ok give me a sec.

#

thats page 1.
and then the thing I sent above is page 2.

limber compass
#

@fleet yew Did you end up forming the equations atleast?

#

I just want to check now if my equations are right or not.

fleet yew
#

<@&286206848099549185> if anyone wants to help him

#

i'm done lol

limber compass
#

damn how are people struggling with this lol. I thought this is like very low level.

lost mesa
#

i dont think amd can't solve it

#

i think he just got annoyed

#

fyi im not gonna do it either im busy

fleet yew
#

Nah im just done with discord for rn

lost mesa
#

ah ok my b

odd helm
#

What algorithm am I supposed to apply 5 times?

limber compass
#

The real questoin is @lost mesa can you solve it? 🤔
(or help me atleast with forming the equations lol)
I am very desperate sorry.

#

I am sure I did it wrong because how can I get negative 750 for vitamin C

lost mesa
#

im hella burnt out rn, going to bed here soon

#

so na not at the moment

#

sorry

#

i found the solution online

#

or, what i think is the solution

#

@limber compass

limber compass
#

Lol

#

aight let me work backwards

fleet yew
#

Lmao

grizzled totem
#

I'm doing sets and my question is regarding power sets

#

Here is an example question: X = {3,4,5,6} and Y = {2,3,5,7}. Question 1: P(X n Y)

#

So I need to find out the power set of X n Y

#

My question is, do I need a "Ø" symbol when doing this?

#

e.g the answer is {Ø},{3},{5},{3,5}

#

Or will it be ok to do {},{3},{5},{3,5}

#

without the symbol

#

Or is it in this format? {Ø,{3},{5},{3,5}}

willow bear
#

Here is an example question: X = 3,4,5,6 and Y = 2,3,5,7. Question 1: P(X n Y)

#

X = {3,4,5,6}

#

you cannot and should never omit the braces when writing a set like this

grizzled totem
#

Fixed it

willow bear
#

anyway, the empty set is a member of any powerset

grizzled totem
#

I'm even seeing answers displayed like this P(XnY) = P ({3,5}) = {{3},{5}, {3,5},Ø}

willow bear
#

i mean these are sets

#

the order in which you list the elements of a set doesn't matter

#

what matters is that you get the elements right

#

ie include everything that should be included and nothing else

grizzled totem
#

If my answer doesn't include the "Ø" symbol, will I lose marks?

#

because that isn't a set

copper wedge
#

Yeah

grizzled totem
#

Like this {},{3},{5},{3,5}

copper wedge
#

It a set

willow bear
#

if you're asked "write out the powerset of [blah]" and your answer doesn't contain the empty set as an element

copper wedge
#

Phi={}

willow bear
#

then yes you will lose marks bc you're guaranteed to have the wrong answer

grizzled totem
#

Ah, ok cheers mate

willow bear
#

the empty set symbol isn't phi.

#

and whoever insists otherwise is a liar.

copper wedge
#

'Yeah it denotes phi

willow bear
#

no.

#

the empty set is the empty set. it has its own special symbol.

grizzled totem
#

Will this get me full marks? P(XnY) = P({3,5}) = {{3},{5}, {3,5},Ø}

#

Or shall I do it your way?

willow bear
#

this is okay

#

your answer is correct

copper wedge
#

Phi:={}

#

So does not matter

willow bear
#

you're trying to insist that the empty set symbol and the greek letter phi are the same symbol

#

which they AREN'T

copper wedge
#

And u are suggesting the letter x=2

#

Common

#

They are used as notations

#

Dont make a fuss

#

We all know

#

They mean something else

willow bear
#

And u are suggesting the letter x=2

#

no???

copper wedge
#

Solve xsqrt-5x+6=0

#

U will know

#

Even 1 denotes one

#

Haaha..

grizzled totem
#

I have a cardinality question, e.g |F n H|

#

The put the answer for F n H as Ø because it has no values that fit in there

#

so would the cardinality also be Ø

#

furthermore, I'm looking at the mark scheme, the answer that was put on there wasn't Ø, it is simply 0

copper wedge
#

If u are asking about number of element in that set

#

And if phi is there

#

Then its also a member

#

And should be taken into aaccounr

grizzled totem
#

So as we can see, it is established that the answer for that is "Ø"

#

The next question is

#

Which is the cardinality

copper wedge
#

Oh ues

#

Then its 0

grizzled totem
copper wedge
#

It has no elements

grizzled totem
#

This is what the mark scheme shows

#

But what if i put "Ø"

#

instead of 0?

copper wedge
#

No u cant

#

0 denotes the number zero

#

Phi is used to denote a set having no elements

grizzled totem
#

Ah, I thought it can be used as 0

copper wedge
#

U cant equate a number with a set.

grizzled totem
#

btw

#

Do you know what specific type of vectors this is? So I can research it

#

Because when I just search for vectors on youtube, I see Graphs

copper wedge
#

Do u have physics

#

This vectors are the ones which is very common to physics

grizzled totem
#

I don't do physics

copper wedge
#

Okay then its there in maths as well

grizzled totem
#

I'm doing software engineering

#

and I'm given that question

copper wedge
#

This is the geometrical representation of a vector

#

Join the origin with that point....

oblique thicket
#

What do you mean by the type of a vector?

grizzled totem
#

It's ok I found it

#

I had to search for Vector dot products

copper wedge
#

We have vector spaces in maths

grizzled totem
#

I'm going to revise then attempt and come back

copper wedge
#

So even 3 may serves as a vector

oblique thicket
#

Also look up arithmetic vectors, those are what you were given in those tasks.

copper wedge
#

At the context of the problem

#

So its necesssary to know the area of study before..u know waht i mean

#

@oblique thicketyou call them arithmetic vectors

oblique thicket
#

I don't really know the correct term in english, so I directly translated it.

copper wedge
#

For us its the very first type of vectors we encounter..with a magnitude and a direction

oblique thicket
#

Arithmetic vector is an ordered set of numbers for which operations of summation and multiplication on a scalar are defined.

copper wedge
#

In case you are not from the same country as i am

#

@oblique thicket yeah..

#

Similar then

#

Just a different notation

#

Thats all

grizzled totem
#

Is this correct

#



V.W = 2(-1) + 0(1) + 3(5)

= -2 + 0 + 15 = 13```
copper wedge
#

Yeah

#

Absolutltly

#

Are u doing this on a computer

grizzled totem
#

Is it right?

#

When you write absolutely it sounds like sarcasm

#

Ok I just used a website that calculates it for me to check my answer was correct

#

This is what I'm stuck on now

#

I have the answer 13

#

and it says "find the angle between the two vectors to two
decimal places; "

#

But I don't have 2 decimal places

oblique thicket
#

I think that means you need 2 correct digits after the coma. Like 2,148552... ~= 2,15.

grizzled totem
#

I know

#

But I have 13

blissful remnant
oblique thicket
#

13 is not the angle, it's a dot product. The angle between two vectors is arccos((v,w)/(|v|*|w|).

grizzled totem
oblique thicket
#

Yep, that's it

grizzled totem
#

I'll revise it and attempt it

#



Find V.W and find the angle between the two vectors to two
decimal places; 
 = 2(-1) + 0(1) + 3(5)
-------------------------
√2² + 0² + 3² √-1² + 1² + 5² 



-2 + 0 + 15                            13   
-----------------------    =      ------------
√4+0+9 √-1+1+25                     3.6125 
oblique thicket
#

There still should be square roots in the denominator at the end. And instead of being added, they should be multiplied.

grizzled totem
#

damn it I don't have a scientific calculator

oblique thicket
#

Now there's 25 instead of 27. but you've got the idea.

grizzled totem
#

I have to do cos-1 13 3.61√25

copper wedge
#

Yeah done

#

@blissful remnantwaht

grizzled totem
#

Is what I'm saying right?

#

Found a calculator

copper wedge
#

@blissful remnant from gralh 1 annd 3 satisfies...so the faxroes are x-1 amd x-3...

#

@grizzled totemi dont know that..i said becaise i thkugh u had a calculator

grizzled totem
#

Yes I found a calculator

#

I wrote Cos-1( on the calculator

#

I don't know how to make the (___) appear

copper wedge
#

Wait wait

grizzled totem
#

This is what I mean

#

1 sec

copper wedge
#

That wont work

#

Probably u have written cos -1

#

😂😂

grizzled totem
#

yes I've done cos-1 with the button

#

I did Shift Cos

#

to make the cos-1 appear

#

I'm using casio scientific calculator

copper wedge
#

Alright

grizzled totem
#

I didn't manually write cos-1 if that's what you're saying

#

I don't know how to make the ____ appear

copper wedge
#

I thought that

#

😂

grizzled totem
#

I think I found it

#

done

copper wedge
#

😇

grizzled totem
#

my answer is 43.927 rounded to 2 is 43.93

#

I'm going to try to find a calculator online to work this out for me and see if it will give the same answer

copper wedge
#

Wait wait

grizzled totem
#

My answer to this question is 43.93°

copper wedge
#

Does the ans matches

#

Oh..may be thats why...because the max value cos inv can spit out is pie (in radian)

#

U probably converted in degrress

grizzled totem
#

I think I did it wrong

oblique thicket
#

You've forgot to square -1

grizzled totem
#

What?

#

-1 + 1 + 25 is 25

#

Do I need to square root the 25?

oblique thicket
#

But you need (-1)^2 = 1

#

And the whole thing is sqrt(27) then

grizzled totem
#

-1^2 is -1

oblique thicket
#

But (-1)^2 = 1 because minus should also be squared.

grizzled totem
#

oh the brackets

oblique thicket
#

Yep

grizzled totem
#

Actually I'm confused

#

Where have I written (-1)^2

oblique thicket
#

It should've been inside of the second square root in the denominator.

grizzled totem
#

I got 25 from doing 5 squared

oblique thicket
#

No, 25 is ok. The -1 here should be (-1)^2, that is 1

#

And the whole thing then is a square root of 27, not 25

grizzled totem
#

I don't think I've written (-1)^2 anywhere

#

I've written it there but not in brackets, the tutorial i watched didn't bracket that

oblique thicket
#

It should've. You should square the coordinates of the vector and add them, and you just squared the numbers and kept the sign, which is wrong.

grizzled totem
oblique thicket
#

Brackets are necessary only with -1.

grizzled totem
#

Or only the negative numbers

#

are bracketed

#

I'll try it again

oblique thicket
#

Generally, if you have a power of negative number, put it in brackets.

grizzled totem
#

and you just squared the numbers and kept the sign, which is wrong.

#

Shall I square root the 27?

oblique thicket
#

Yep, now take acos of it and you'll get your angle.

grizzled totem
#

I got 5.20 for square root of 27, now I don't know what to do with the 3.61 and the 5.20

oblique thicket
#

Calculate that fraction.

#

3.61 and 5.20 are multiplied together

grizzled totem
#

so if i just put a space between them on the calculator, it multiplies?

#

I did multiply symbol

#

I didn't put a space

oblique thicket
#

It will be multiplied if you put a multiplication sign between them.

grizzled totem
#

I got the answer 46.17

#

My final answer

#

That's wrong I think

oblique thicket
#

How did you got it?

grizzled totem
#

Hold on

oblique thicket
#

Hmm. That's weird.

grizzled totem
#

I found a calculator online that does it for you

#

This is what it shows

#

I don't know where I went wrong

#

the 13 is correct at the top

oblique thicket
#

They've just calculated the cosine of an angle between vectors and got it right, but the task you were given asked for the angle.

grizzled totem
#

So mine is correct

#

I think

#

You're right

#

Ok I'm going to check the mark scheme now

#

I don't know why I didn't think of that

#

I got it wrong

oblique thicket
#

Weird

grizzled totem
#

The 13 at the top is right

#

How do you go from Square root 27 to square root 3?

oblique thicket
#

sqrt(27) = sqrt(3 * 3 * 3) = 3*sqrt(3)

#

Oh, maybe they want the result in radians?

grizzled totem
#

Same answer as on mark scheme

oblique thicket
#

Yep, that's that same angle in radians.

grizzled totem
#

I'm trying to figure out where I went wrong with my working out

#

ohhh

oblique thicket
#

No, you weren't wrong, you just got your answer in degrees instead of radians, if I understood the situation correctly. Am I missing something?

grizzled totem
#

I wasn't supposed to square root the 13

#

I googled that

#

On calculator it just shows as √13

#

Even if I try calculate what √13 is on calculator, it just shows as √13 for the answer

oblique thicket
#

You could've calculated it, but for precision it's much better to leave it to the very end and then calculate it with a few more digits then you need.

grizzled totem
#

How do you get that from the square root of 27?

oblique thicket
#

27 = 3 * 3^2 therefor sqrt(27) = sqrt(3 * 3^2) = sqrt(3) * sqrt(3^2) = sqrt(3)*3

grizzled totem
#

How was I supposed to know that

#

Ok so we have that solved

#

Finally

oblique thicket
#

You were supposed to learn about powers and roots in school.

grizzled totem
#

that to √39/9

#

or maybe the calculator can do that?

oblique thicket
#

Divide 13 by sqrt(13), then multiply numerator and denominator by sqrt(3)

#

Calculator for sure can calculate the whole thing easily

grizzled totem
#

Oh wow

#

my calculator did it

#

That's why it says calculator is allowed

#

I finally worked it out

#

I'm going to move onto the next question

royal citrus
neon garden
upbeat moss
#

I wanted to ask for assistance with a problem, but here are already 2 waiting.
Dont want to just stack that further.

serene heath
#

@royal citrus what have u tried

#

what did u try @neon garden

neon garden
#

I’m not really sure how to start @serene heath

viscid thistle
#

Is (-Inf, 0) U (6, Inf) the same domain as
(-Inf, -1] U [7, Inf) ? Wondering if there's more than one way to state a domain

serene heath
#

write 1.05 in terms of e @neon garden

oblique thicket
#

@viscid thistle If your domains are defined over integers - yes.

viscid thistle
#

ah neat

Thank you!

oblique thicket
#

Also you can write the same domain as either Z \ [0,6] or Z \ (-1,7). Though in case of integers it's generally better to use closed intervals.

neon garden
#

@serene heath So now I have f(x) = 1000(0.39e)^x

upbeat moss
#

I am lost.
I understand how to do synthetic division, but I do not know how to approach this problem

viscid thistle
#

Find a 0 first

#

Then you have 1 factor and can divide by this factor

#

There is a super long formula for 3rd degree, though I'd suggest to try out some obvious choices

upbeat moss
#

when you say find a 0 first, you mean make x=0? which would basically remove the solo x next to the +10

viscid thistle
#

$2x^3-7x^2+x+10=0$

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
#

Solve that

#

Just try some integers around 0

#

Most of those exercises don't require you to use the cubic formula

#

@upbeat moss still there?

upbeat moss
#

yes, sorry, i think im almost done

#

sorry, I struggle a lot with math

viscid thistle
#

Found first root?

#

Try like -2,-1,0,1,2,3

upbeat moss
#

I used 1

#

just now

viscid thistle
#

You should try the number after that

oblique thicket
#

or just -1.

viscid thistle
#

Works too

upbeat moss
#

uh like this?

uncut mulch
#

no

upbeat moss
#

o

uncut mulch
#

watch your order of operations

#

Just try some integers around 0
bad

viscid thistle
#

Well how else?

#

The long x^3 formula?

uncut mulch
#

rational root theorem

viscid thistle
#

Has he done that?

upbeat moss
#

never heard of that till now

uncut mulch
#

sometimes they don't teach you the name

oblique thicket
#

To be fair, all of the possible rational roots are close to 0 here.

upbeat moss
#

i am watching a video of it now

#

sorry for all the trouble

uncut mulch
#

but not all are necessarily integers

#

and you shouldn't be testing stuff like +-3 for this question

#

if you try to apply the "integers close to 0" approach to something like: 12x^3 + 32x^2 + x - 10
then you'd be stuffed

oblique thicket
#

yeah, I just assumed that it's unlikely someone in precalculus should use rational roots theorem.

upbeat moss
#

is it below standard?

uncut mulch
#

i'm pretty sure you should've been taught it if you were given that question

#

its a relatively simple method instead of "blindly" testing stuff

#

as for those algebaric mistakes: $2 \cdot 1^3 \neq (2 \cdot 1)^3$

obsidian monolithBOT
upbeat moss
#

no actually. My professor basically told us just to test numbers.

#

im looking at this rational root theorem video now, it is simple, but i am 99.9% sure I never seen it in my life

uncut mulch
#

mmmk. i mean a lot of the time it will involve +-1 (which are possible rational roots in all cases)

upbeat moss
#

I think I did this Rational Root Theorem right.
got the factors of the constant 10 and the factors of 2 from the 2x^3.
1 did not leave me off with 0, so going to check the remaining numbers (-1, 2,5, 10, 1/2 and 2.5)

#

ok -1 gave me 0

upbeat moss
#

sorry for my sloppy handwriting.
I type more than I actually write

#

I hope I did this correctly

vernal spindle
uncut mulch
#

determine values of sin x, tan x for x in quad 2
apply double angle identities

vernal spindle
#

I'm still struggling with it, the part I don't get is what -1/3 equals since it isn't on my trig circle chart

uncut mulch
#

without solving for x

#

-1/3 is just -1/3

#

draw your own triangle to determine the other trig ratios

#

using something like pythagoras

vernal spindle
#

a^2+b^2=c^2?

fleet yew
#

If you double an angle in the second quadrant, what quadrant does it go to

vernal spindle
#

4th?

uncut mulch
#

a^2+b^2=c^2
sure

#

and applying that, if cos(x) = -1/3 and x is in Q2,
determine sin(x) and tan(x)

vernal spindle
#

Do I use

#

cosx-1=sin

uncut mulch
#

no. that isn't even a thing

pure juniper
#

It’s sin^2x + cos^2x =1

vernal spindle
#

would it be, cos^2x-1=sin^2x, then?

uncut mulch
#

no

#

watch your signs

pure juniper
#

-sin^2x

fleet yew
#

Cosx-1=-versinx

uncut mulch
#

explain what operations you were attempting to apply (to get what you got)

vernal spindle
#

I was doing sin^2x+cos^2x=1 then -cos^2x from both sides which was giving me sin^2x=1-cos^2x

uncut mulch
#

yes thats better

#

and very different from what you typed earlier

pure juniper
#

Can’t you use sum formulas for this

uncut mulch
#

need to identify sin(x) and tan(x) first

pure juniper
#

treat sin(2x) as sin(x+x)

uncut mulch
#

to make things easier

vernal spindle
#

would plugging -1/3 make it sin^2x=1-(-1/3)^2 ?

uncut mulch
#

yes

vernal spindle
#

so sin^2x=8/9?

uncut mulch
#

yes

vernal spindle
#

🥳

uncut mulch
#

just a small note, you should put parentheses around the (x)

primal yarrow
#

Will you reply yes to this question too?

uncut mulch
#

banana

primal yarrow
#

Why you gotta do me like that

vernal spindle
#

is the cos^2x = sin^2x-1

uncut mulch
#

no

#

where are you getting that? also going on a detour

#

from: sin^2(x)=8/9, and x is in Q2
what is the value of sin(x)?

primal yarrow
#

Dont use "tangent" metaphorically in a math discussion

uncut mulch
#

lol ok

primal yarrow
#

Cool

vernal spindle
uncut mulch
#

well yes, it will be positive, but that's only part of it

vernal spindle
#

what do you mean?

uncut mulch
#

what is the value of sin(x)?

vernal spindle
#

+8/9 ?

uncut mulch
#

no

vernal spindle
#

sqrt(8/9)

uncut mulch
#

yes. can you simplify that a bit

vernal spindle
#

sqrt(8)/3

uncut mulch
#

simplify the sqrt(8) further

vernal spindle
#

2sqrt(2)/3

primal yarrow
#

Yay

uncut mulch
#

ok good

primal yarrow
#

Got nervous lol

uncut mulch
#

now that you have both sin(x) and cos(x), you can apply the double angle identity to determine
sin(2x)

vernal spindle
#

wait what

#

which is 2sqrt(2)/3 for

#

I got lost

uncut mulch
#

$\cos(x) = -\frac13 ; \ \sin(x) = \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}$

obsidian monolithBOT
vernal spindle
#

ohh i see it now

#

then tan is sin/cos so (2sqrt(2)/3)/(-1/3)

uncut mulch
#

which can be simplified, i mentioned tan(x) earlier but you don't really need it

#

sin(x) and cos(x) is used to help determine sin(2x)
cos(x) alone is sufficient to determine cos(2x)
tan(2x) can be determined from your first 2 answers

vernal spindle
#

2sincosx?

uncut mulch
#

uh...not quite

vernal spindle
#

2sinxcosx?

uncut mulch
#

also parentheses to make stuff less ambiguous

#

2sin(x)cos(x)

vernal spindle
#

(-(4sqrt(2))/9)

uncut mulch
#

parentheses overkill there but that works

fleet yew
#

((( )))

vernal spindle
#

also parentheses to make stuff less ambiguous
@uncut mulch

uncut mulch
#

-4sqrt(2)/9
is sufficient/clear/unambiguous

vernal spindle
#

fair enough lol

#

but then the computer might take it wrong

uncut mulch
#

if it follows order of operations correctly its fine

vernal spindle
#

for cos2x would it be 1-2sin^2x

uncut mulch
#

compared to: 2sinxcosx
99.9999+% of the time it is intended and will be interpreted as 2sin(x)cos(x)
however there is an off chance that someone may have intended something like 2sin(x*cos(x))

#

cos**(2x)** = 1- 2sin^2**(x)**

#

will work

vernal spindle
#

dumb question, but how do I handle sin^2x here

#

since i have sinx and sin2x

uncut mulch
#

$\sin^2(x) \equiv (\sin(x))^2$

obsidian monolithBOT
vernal spindle
#

oh so just (2sqrt(2)/3)^2

uncut mulch
#

for the sin^2(x) part yes

vernal spindle
#

-17/9

uncut mulch
#

how are you getting that?

#

and why is it < - 1

vernal spindle
#

I got 8/9 from squaring sin^2x, then 1-2(8/9)

#

ohh

#

-7/9

uncut mulch
#

yes

vernal spindle
#

now tan2(x)

uncut mulch
#

tan(2x) NOT tan2(x)

vernal spindle
#

right right

#

which equals

#

(2tanx)/(1-tan^2(x))

uncut mulch
#

you could apply that,

#

however

#

you already know the values of sin(2x) and cos(2x)

#

which makes things a lot simpler

vernal spindle
#

oh so sin(2x)/cos(2x) ?

uncut mulch
#

yes

vernal spindle
#

(-12sqrt(2))/21 ?

#

wait no negative

uncut mulch
#

nope

vernal spindle
#

12sqrt(2)/21 ?

uncut mulch
#

unsimplfied.

#

though i'm not sure how those values increased like that

vernal spindle
#

what do you mean unsimplified?

uncut mulch
#

can be simplified

#

further

#

eg. 2/4 is unsimplified

vernal spindle
#

ohh 4sqrt(2)/7

uncut mulch
#

yeh. but i'm still not sure how you didn't reach that directly

viscid thistle
#

Hey everyone
I've got a question

#

If the population of X let's say was 2,500,000 in the year 2025, how large will the population be in 2040 if it's at a growth rate at 4%

patent beacon
#

I'll do this in millions to keep the numbers small

viscid thistle
#

The original question was: Researchers found out that the growth rate for the population of the animal is 4% and the population in 2025 was 2,500,000. How large will the population be in 2040?

#

If that helps.

patent beacon
#

2.5(1.04)^15

viscid thistle
#

oh wow.

#

wait

#

where did you get the 15 from

#

oh...

patent beacon
#

Or, just multiply by 1.04 for every year

viscid thistle
#

Oh

#

You just did 40-25

#

lol

#

Got it!

#

So its 2,500,000 times (1.04)^15

#

right?

#

@patent beacon

patent beacon
#

Ya

copper wedge
#

I think u need to construct a differential equation

viscid thistle
#

No

karmic sparrow
vernal spindle
#

when using A/sina = B=sinb I keep getting stuck when I get to something like 20 = 12/sinx, what do i do next to isolate the x

uncut mulch
#

A/sina = B=sinb
is that a typo

vernal spindle
#

Isn't that the formula for getting triangle lengths

uncut mulch
#

if ur applying the sine rule/law
that second = should've been a /

#

anyway from 20 = 12/sinx
rearrange it to get
sin(x) = 12/20 = 3/5

#

then apply inverse trig and be careful of the ambiguous case

vernal spindle
#

wait i think i did it upside down, sinA/a = sinB/b = sinC/c

uncut mulch
#

doesn't really matter. its fine either way

odd helm
odd helm
#

<@&286206848099549185>

vernal spindle
uncut mulch
#

$\sin(\theta) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

which is a special ratio

odd helm
#

Could someone look at my question too

#

For intermediate value theorem

tawny nacelle
odd helm
#

Yeah I posted it above

#

It’s above Kings question

vernal spindle
#

Is it +-sqrt(2)/2

uncut mulch
#

no where's the - coming from?

vernal spindle
#

I was thinking for the sqrt

uncut mulch
#

sqrt(2) only returns one value

vernal spindle
#

hmm

uncut mulch
#

$\sqrt{2}$ is not the same as $\pm\sqrt{2}$

obsidian monolithBOT
vernal spindle
#

what could I do then?

uncut mulch
#

$\sin(\theta) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

what would be the solution in Q1?

vernal spindle
#

45 degrees?

uncut mulch
#

use radians because the question is using radians

vernal spindle
#

pi/4

uncut mulch
#

where else is sin positive?

vernal spindle
#

3pi/4

uncut mulch
#

not answering my question directly but ok

#

and that's it

#

those are your 2 solutions in the interval [0, 2pi)

vernal spindle
#

ah i get it

#

about for where tan(0)=1

odd helm
#

Could I get help

#

With mine as well

undone pawn
#

yes

odd helm
#

I’m not gonna lie it makes sense why I haven’t gotten help yet but

#

Idk what I’m doing wrong

#

I’m following the steps

#

It says do a+b/2 and I did

#

But my answer isn’t close to correct

willow bear
#

about for where tan(0)=1
tan(0) isn't 1

#

tan(0) is 0

vernal spindle
willow bear
#

and why are you writing theta as 0 then

#

nobody will know that you meant theta when you wrote that 0

#

anyway what is giving you trouble with this equation

vernal spindle
#

Ohh wait could it be at pi/4 since (sqrt(2)/2)/(sqrt(2)/2) is 1

willow bear
#

π/4 is a solution indeed.

vernal spindle
#

I kept looking at 90,180,270,360 trying to figure out how to get the 0 and 1 to become 1

#

I see it now

willow bear
#

in the future, please do NOT substitute the symbol 0 for the letter θ

vernal spindle
#

I'm stuck on this one now, since its 2x i can't simply look at a pi circle

willow bear
#

have you ever solved trigonometric equations on the entire number line yet

vernal spindle
#

I don't think so

willow bear
#

...

#

welp

vernal spindle
#

How can I do it though?

hard hornet
#

let $\alpha = 2\theta$

obsidian monolithBOT
hard hornet
#

can you solve that at least?

#

$2\sin(\alpha) = -1$

#

solve for alpha

obsidian monolithBOT
vernal spindle
#

like sinx=-1/2 ?

hard hornet
#

yes

#

exactly, solve that

#

there are going to be an infinite number of solutions, but you can just give me the first four solutions starting at 0

vernal spindle
#

(7pi)/6, (11pi)/6 ?

hard hornet
#

yup those are 2 solutions

#

give me 2 more